belarus is not obsessed foxes, blocky rivers and lakes, necronotous nature from which it’s not possible to tear maxim from the neck. but belarus is people. we open them for you. we carry traditions about generations and at the same time change our views on the

sound of reggae. and robing you are the light of the yakmahalevs. belarusians are so pink ali their poisonous one love of the people's earth belarus 20 shatyrs hello, on the eve of the first weekend of the autumn of the turbulent 2020, we are discussing the topics that

are being discussed these days, uh, everything, let's talk about the day of knowledge and the president's open lesson belarus, the lessons he taught about party building. we will definitely talk about belarus, we will talk about ukraine, which is rolling into the abyss, and the west, which helps ukraine to roll. e down. although, according to the information that comes from the west itself, the soul does not begin to take cold water on schedule, but we do not travel in the west, and we do not need it. at least until the change of power. it will happen there. uh, soon, by the way, some countries in the united states of the baltic states, by the way, uh, offer russians to ban entry to the european union is generally completely irreversible, but it seems to me that ingenious decisions were made after this shower. e in the west, they will generally stop accepting. e, so to speak , with napkins, and then reusable, but that's all. today we'll talk. oh let me but, as always, i will introduce the guests who are present in our studio. this is dmitry alexandrovich zhuk, head of the sb holding belarus today olga shpilevskaya, director of

the representative office of the mtrk world in belarus, i will also add the head of the belarusian union for women, marat markov, head of the unt. vadim digin, head of social studies, and igor marzalyuga, deputy. uh, we’ll call the house of representatives for a long time, we’ll call you, you won’t find it in time, here is the chairman committee chairman one head chairman of the standing committee. well, the day of knowledge, uh, the president held a big open lesson. uh, he caused a resonance. i think that all of you watched the broadcast of our someone and was present at the scene. i wanted to sum it all up so briefly, this was done by another colleague alexander pavlovich shpakovsky, he wrote a post, i read it and i realized that nothing needs to be added, if i may, i will quote, as far as historical memory is concerned, the president took different stories. epoch and gave them his assessment so the first principality of polotsk is the cradle of belarusian statehood and

an independent center of historical russia along with kiev and novgorod, the second. e, the grand duchy of lithuania, the russian and squeezing state, created by our ancestors, the belarusian lands were state states, forming in this medieval formation, modern lithuania unreasonably manipulated history on, remember, the president said that our language was in general, that there was nothing lithuanian there was lithuanian speech, the commonwealth was an anti-example by building god-state unions, the polish elites, they cunningly deceived, they strove for unilateral domination, they pushed on with the moscow principality. in general, a negative assessment of the role of warsaw throughout the history of the belarusian people, up to the present day, was given examples . an adequate assessment of the period was given. russian empire with the exception of the belarusian lands in its composition the process stopped, and the polishing of the belarusians. our people reunited with their brothers russian ukrainians in the war, 812. the weather was for belarusians, patriotic in the 19th century , the process of the birth of the belarusian nation began and the last fifth point of the soviet period of the bssr, the

foundation of our statehood was laid at that time industrial potential was the basis of the economy belarusians were equal participants in the great socialist project that ensures balance in the world the feat of the soviet people during the great patriotic war is the most important component historical memory of our country belarusian. the people of those years survived the genocide, the scale of which has yet to be assessed and comprehended and presented to the whole world. well, in general, it seems to me, uh, and short and at the same time covers everything about anything. uh, the head of state dagestanovich said you were there, and the youth, in general, uh, are generally aware of all this or have questions. i think that young people in general are aware of it myself, but naturally something is the most important thing that we are doing today. but what about the great patriotic war. it is when belarus was killed, but this is just the result. an ostrich, in the first place, an ostrich policy, which was pursued by individual comrades from historical science, and some are still trying to continue when, haltingly,

choking with indignation, individual, it seems, already have hair here. he is also told that there is no need to talk about traitors about collaborators, and their crimes need to be told. who is at khatyn, who burned out, you see why? well, why, but as a result of the figures of silence, there is no holy place for this place either. uh, others are coming stories from the internet from the so-called alternative stories of history, because for the sake of objectivity, i must immediately say belarusian textbooks. which is in the school, which can be improved, can be corrected at the same time, there have never been any such promises of a civil war during the great patriotic war of belarusians against belarusians, and i am deeply convinced that this will not be from the internet. this internet is a benefit. these are pamphlets. this is the oil of lying princesses, as a rule, they are all specifically in order to

spectrum cover in russian, which is filled with all the stores were our country, and which is still sufficient. moreover , they export the same texts to the territory of the russian federation books. i am very often published to you, by the way, at the non-belarusian printing base in smolensk, smolensk dealt with this issue, unfortunately, yes, well, you are there, the main thing is paid and that's it. from here it’s just that when another franchise was, uh, the editor-in-chief of the belarusian thought, uh, it was. very good review article if not eh hmm, in my opinion, i appreciated the surname when i was yes and once upon a time a whole series was issued and very many of these messages igor alexandrovich even 10 years ago on the page to the belarusian thought. we raised 2010 not all officials. they even understood what we were talking about on this topic, when these blocks of the blagosfera appeared full of so-called

alternative historical content, and it was there that the glarification and whitening of those who were with the germans took place, and it was from there that this idea that the great patriotic war was not there was something just tragedy, that is, er, there is such a test. eh, i was surprised at the time. it seemed to me that an adequate historian was engaged in media science. i congratulated him one of the well now far away already ran for a long time there. under the white-red-white flag in the twentieth year and emigrated to myself in germany, i dropped the medal for courage on may 9. well, there was such a post and just congratulated me on the holiday and heard in response. it 's not holy to me. it's a tragedy to me, you know, uh, but it's a tragedy. well, that’s right, but victory yes, you understand, that is, a tragedy is just death, and moreover, in this of death. there are two equally great two equally responsible parties, supposedly. here are the belarusians.

this is an inter-young hammer and cavalry. well, this is all the conceptualism, to make it clear. this is the conceptualism of immigrant historiography, belarusian, lyceums. yes, this is historiography. this is the alternative history of soros, which he tried to impose on this and this is the historiography of justifying himself beloved and in every possible way and trying to say that i was good, i must say that it was organized, this is the alternative supposedly, the story that quarrels tried to impose on us through textbooks and which our fugitives adhere to, it arose in the midst of the so -called second wave of emigration. what is the second wave? this is a policeman a policeman who is inferior and henchman of all who fled munich created a center for the study of the peoples of the ussr and there, according to the same patterns for ukrainians for russians for georgians for the balts for serbs, by the way, speaking in yugoslavia for belarusians it was riveted, this one here false story about several

major gigs thirty of them in total soviet russian wrote. i recently visited the excellent film archive of photo documents in dzerzhinsk, where there are confiscated from the germans. you hear trophy albums, no need to explain anything, the white-red-white flag did not exist there until that moment, relatively speaking, but the beginning, er, the great forgotten one. yes, yes, and now, there is another way to explain. there is a photo on one sleeve. this flag on the second sweet is belarusian. a young man, there is something training and acting next to, uh, i am touched by all my colleagues who shout that they are the greatest experts on the history of the great patriotic war, who declare that such illustrations of young people should not be shown in textbooks, there is no need to write about it. i do not need crimes under this flag either. moreover, i will tell you that we were in the newspaper when we published those photographs about which you remembered them. yes, we received a letter saying that we are engaged in forgery, that

we did this there, not that. by the way, in your material, in my opinion, a german album. and this is what shocks me the most. here, look what happened today. yes , a generation has gone, remember. do you remember, yes, look, my grandfather is a vologda komsomolets who became a belarusian partisan. yes, and then he stayed here in belarus lived all his life for me, no and never. there was no doubt how history passed, because i have a history of my family. yes, the same thing, many stories are different. someone was at the front, someone was taken prisoner, someone was taken out. someone. sorry, someone's ancestors were collaborators. and this is also part of our history must be understood, but we are talking about that today we young people should form a worldview based on the historical truth . and the truth is that we

beat the enemy on our land, that's all absolutely, and the one who helped. to fight with those who were on the side of the soviet union the red army, as you like , were traitors at that moment, because they helped to destroy our belarusian people and the responsibility for the genocide lies with them . here is what the president said yesterday when he described this method, when living people were forced to tightly lay down on the dead. but this know-how if i may say so, these are vows, including the sexual, somehow named freedom, the book is already a gift. orlov yes. let's give an example of publishing the names of freedom of their heroes. yes, and they have such a coronavirus there, vital tumash. well, he studied this led deyache with koryn, and these are the children of the

first burgomaster of minsk appointed, and he , along with the german commandant. signed one interesting order on the creation of german. the ghetto , so this order crosses out everything that he is there, i don’t care at all what he is studied the passage. i think that it is much inferior to our well-known ones with corona. i don’t know what he could study there in exile . rather, these signatures like this, they cross out everything the same way. as igor alexandrovich, at the request of the president, gave a detailed biography of arseniev, the author, the author. yes , how do they write the mighty god? so we can sort it out for everyone, because these people , in cooperation with the germans, when they already saw and knew what was happening, when they didn’t just see, they teach on the dry street, where it was, where it is now people in park in the center and didn't see each other for that. just one more moment. why types of mascara? the

so-called belarusian committee, which he was a member of, which was allowed by the germans, he was supervised by the sd and the abwehr and aizats of the group and other daturs, became the burgomaster of minsk. and here is the eizatzgruppe b, which was walking around belarus and there was a whole bloc of locals who helped to draw up black books, black lists , identify and destroy activists. he was on this team. he was an agent of the sd all about them who came in the forty-first year everyone who helped defend the territory the germans received posts the second character who came up with the sardine method, about which the president spoke yesterday. here it is tightly packed. this mayor borisovna stankevich knows literature. we also wrote about him in belorusskoe. yes , gorgeous. by the way, i advise everyone. look on the internet. there is an excellent article from the belarusian dunka. devoted to kill yourself on the site is called, dedicated according to archival documents. you can’t say that there is a forgery of lies

about stanislav stankevich, who organized the destruction of the entire population of jewish borisov, who inspired his stumbled upon his policemen, who on the eve, if they were on the eve of the murder, were held in the evening of boris and a banquet, where stankevich spoke incendiary anti-semitic speeches and inspired destruction, and it was he who came up with this method of sardines, a dense packing of people on the dead, and a very neat was a comrade. here in those protocols that are given in the article published by the belarusian dumka. uh, from the central archive. no matter how he even listed the torn crowns from people. everything in detail these people. and here, when they lie brazenly lie, here's our boys guys, who there, i don’t know, say that they were allegedly a third force, only kryakhtin danced. they took the hood to them suprut and

muscovites and to wrap up the supradnevtsy, but in fact, objectively, the homely truth is that the thirteenth belarusian battalion of the sd where individually selected the most notorious scoundrels , it was the husband of natalia arsenievna franz who ate, who took these courses in minsk, officers of the belarusian samokha at forty second year, the thirteenth belarusian sd battalion fell in love with the belarusian public, for which natalya and for this battalion, natalya arsenyeva made this collection, about which getta spoke yesterday on the conscience of this thirteenth belorussian battalion sd-5. and now yank filistovich, the hero of the bnr, was dropped, allegedly from a parachute into the libot forest, and he was shot in the nkvd not because he was with a peony the cia, and not because it was there too, but, but first of all, he was a fighter of the thirteenth belarusian battalion, destroyed people, he was stretched out and in the deepest and most shameful concentration camp for me on the territory of belarus, the most shameful is the

concentration camp in koldychevo. under baranovichi 22.000. polish intelligentsia, jews, gypsies. the partisan has been destroyed. there, with the hands of this selected white chervona white. otrebet, 13 belarusian battalion. i only have a question. what to do? you live in an archive in one frenchevich. write wonderful scientific articles there. eh, work. the schoolboy does not know who wrote the mighty god and what is it worth? by this person, i think the president, when u conceived, here is this open lesson. in general, i advise you to publish and let everyone read selections to the cover in schools, because reaching out to them is different. just impossible. he did this in order to make his contribution, to reach out until then i disagree and i will say more history is such a subtle science on the one hand. on the other

hand, there is always a diverse side, but there are different times when history is looked at differently, and there are disputes over who writes history, and people are already statesmen, who at this moment are watching what is happening or history is being written. that time about those moments that took place today in history, but yesterday the president was not in vain asked a question, rather than teach a teacher to the developer of a history textbook, he asked, but a red thread held our historical memory through the textbooks that we have today and the children now. she didn't answer very well. children learn history at school. eh, right question. and what the president said yesterday, where he placed emphasis on the formation of our states. after all, they are also all arranged, you know, and when the child comes to school, after all, the basics are laid there when the child comes to school exactly there, regardless of what brochures he will take into his own hands or what he will read on the internet. a

foundation is being laid there, if the foundation is laid even when information comes from outside, he will analyze it and not immediately succumb, as if conditionally, to the influence that is exerted on him, and just yesterday the president asked very simple questions. note, yes, that for us is our historical memory, what we are proud of. so here's a question and i myself thought about how i would answer these questions. and i will tell you that these are the questions. we must ask everyone in his family. that's when we sit down in the morning to have tea. let's ask these questions and see how people who live in our family answer these questions. from there, too, everything begins, because drops and grains are first laid there, which then go further. there is one more important point that i would like to draw your attention to. i think this is also such a hmm very good twist. yesterday, in all schools, the lineup began, with the sound of the state game. yesterday, the national anthem was played on the whole country. yesterday. our children, the parents

who brought the children, started their day with a hymn. i believe that this is not just a very good tradition. it's a chic tradition. and it needs to be guided. it has been introduced there for a long time, you know, like a heart. e. here. it's good that we started talking about what we ourselves saw, after all, not only the promises that the president made. eh, they require analysis of such reflection, but also what kind of return did we see from those who were sitting and this one, well, a number of young people there who asked questions, who gave replicas or e. learning reaction we noticed. here, pay attention for some reason. why happened in the twentieth year what happened? why this young man, who studies, seems to be at a university, says that nu does not watch state television channels. yes, he does not receive information, says it is under the president a matter of secrets. you are with all of them okay not all guys. we recorded good ones with them, he

told us, he oh no. when he turned it off, he says, i honestly want to tell you. i do n't read or watch anything. eh, well, you didn't ask question. why are you not interested in this at all? i want to ask you because he wanted to ask something. uh, i don't mean to say there's something bad about this guy. you , uh, everyone probably watched sherlock holmes with pleasure yes, of course, and you like this hero do you remember about copernicus yes, copernicus is a familiar surname? it literally didn't know what ah holls was. you do not know copernicus, he also discovered that the earth revolves around the sun and my eyes, - says sherlock holmes, they tell me that this is the sun, but for now revolves around the earth. so for these guys, in fact, the sun revolves around the earth, for some of them yes, and this does not mean that they are bad people, they will become excellent in their specialty, that he was excellent and

he did not need any other knowledge, but it's about something completely different. when we understand that now a whole generation has grown up, which, looking at the cylinder, sees either a circle or a rectangle. they don't see the cylinder. they are not going to understand it, that is, they see a projection and yes, for them this circle is acceptable. from what angle to look. and that's all for why did you remember soros because you correctly remembered not only the anthem is important, not only textbooks are important. here are the lessons. finally, we began to pay attention to the fact that the education of our children is a foundation that was undermined in the late eighties. i remember. just in case someone forgot, yes, that is the first fund. soros open society was opened in the soviet union in the eighty-seventh year, 87 together with the ministry of culture, together

with the funds of the world, it is excellent and with this money this fund, which invested more than a billion, published textbooks for the tenth-eleventh grade. there, textbooks were published recently for universities for universities in social science. culturological programs were carried out. 64,000 teacher students were trained with the money of the soros foundation. so what do we want to get? yes trained to what we want to receive. eventually. we want to get human citizens. right. yesterday we got over. yesterday we received a clear tracing paper that now we are forced to correct this. here comes the time you know, it's very good that the guy put it this way. there were such questions. we are trying to hang a label monotonous state that we have everything organized. i worked with the president for 10 years. i know how

things are going here, people came, who the presidents invited for this, and they boldly ask this question and he supports the discussion and now the children themselves have seen it. they snatched out that idiots, the president works like that. listen, you should be ashamed of this, because in your light you can't enter the building where she works a press conference, that some of these children, because there are children not only who took it, many looked at it, and some of these children, when they come home, there are such parents who say totalitarian states. that's where this child will definitely be expelled from the university. how does he feel now? uh, well, like his mom, she's probably waiting for him to get kicked out of the university. and when they saw what really. here he is a living president with him. you can talk about everything, he answers all questions. no one kicks anyone anywhere, mouth does not close. nobody wears handcuffs. he told us that he hoped that

after this, uh, communication, those who criticize our government would be seen. finally, that now i can go a little from the other side? yes, we have a guy who doesn't read anything actually, yes, as you said, michael is normal, he's interested in biology, there 's something else. understand, we were inspired for many years from the time of the opening, as we once said , the eighty-seventh year of the funds. yes, those who taught teachers that the school should be depoliticized outside of politics, and we did this as a result of the fact that today a tool has appeared, when these people who know nothing about politics and are purely interested in what they are being satisfied with can be taken out into the street in absolutely 2 hours . here. that most of the schools finished in the soviet union the guys we had a flight of information to our minister

of information the anthem is a good flag. okay, let's think about how high school will go back to public school. give the matter in hand professionals. we need a government program. if you don't like tiktok, good beautiful instagram video, let's do it. how many in a year there are 60 lessons 60 short video lessons of five minutes each on the relevance of the topic, the actual pace in mounted like tiktok has already been mounted about this more than once. they said another thing that if they do not want to come to the editors. let's go and pick them up. they have now a school in all schools pass the school of the active citizen step the school of the active citizen - this implies. here is the type of information for years, about

whom you were talking about the question, who every week the question was not formally heard by the teachers. listen to this figure it out, gyre. you know that events are still difficult for some teachers. it is necessary to explain what is happening not to focus only on education. you look where the background of soros sent his money. these are the four main areas. here we are just talking to you as an education, and now i will return to the biologist boy. this is education. it's science, it's a medium information. and this culture is the four pillars of ideology, ideology is a system of values, and it is just based on these four things. we need to take a, and re-evaluate everything that's going on there. now, if the biologist boy does not read the media , then we must understand that the biologist boy does not care through such funds. if necessary, they will invest the necessary information, of course. well, in general, let's not always politics and this too, but the

media has nothing to say about this issue, which is in the textbooks, about which said the president is already making children normal all children are normal. in any generation, the president that said, says, you did not see what i was. uh, if they sat with stone faces and locks and thought that this was not the story of their own lives. the first strike that came to the high school for a number of organizers was organized. from where everything is yes, the first strike. we were on strike against what cuts, that's why i always alexander saw what a rebel is and also look, look here. uh, that's what from the hands i sat and i enjoyed it when the president laid out lithuanian tailoring and take offense at me, igor aleksandrovich, learned peasant. he made it simple. very applications carefully uh-huh it is important to carefully and look at the territory of the people, the language, the law and then

the troops in the lid of the coffin, but the lithuanians didn’t have them, they didn’t have it here, let me pick up this topic. i know what will happen now, because a very important moment the president went beyond, as many told us, the great patriotic war. and all that now some will try to do these here the words of the president let down the principality of lithuania , they will try to say that you see, he is our bchbeshny narratives, supposedly it’s not his brother who is pulling. it's not your no. so, now they will try to draw in all of their mythic battle under this guide, and so on. the president said that there was a belarusian, igor samich and i also wrote about this, as did russian historians. they are already trying to claim this heritage because they are the grand dukes and in novgorod for the monuments of the millennium, of course, we take the principality of lithuania what is there indeed, we were ours, at the same time, we must look at this story objectively and do

not try to use our ideology as a bchbeshnik , it will not work. so, if i may, i'll explain why it doesn't work about the red lines in the tutorial. firstly, we, including with vadim frantsevich, he is a co-author of this, which means that the textbook history of the belarusian statehood for universities is already in circulation. all these red lines, what is called from the paleolithic to the glavlite from what is the state, the main stages in the formation of the state of the state institutions, culture belarusian historical symbolism, among other things, broke through the red and white flag, there is clearly scientific discreditation of these things that we spoke with you, there are photographs and photographic materials, there is everything for universities, this is the most important first discipline in the unitary bloc, which will be in all universities from this year studied at school, with regard to secondary special educational history, belarus in secondary specialized educational institutions. from next year

, it will also be studied at colleges , but we will do a reduced on this option. there will be a little. well, after all, a university and a specialized secondary school are two different things. now, with regard to school textbooks. in certain textbooks, a certain red line has already been drawn, i would also like to remind you about the textbook of the eleventh grade, according to which the graduates of this one studied there, all these things, as for the great patriotic war, collaborationism is clearly short, but extremely specific without any of these things is spelled out it wasn't written before, but now it is. well, the last moment. and i just last year physically did not have time, especially since the most important thing was the history of the belarusian statehood. i'm announcing this thing. so far i have been refusing your transmissions. and you worked. i was sitting, uh, in uh, at the computer. i had a whole month of vacation, and i finished writing and

polishing. uh, a manual on the history of belarusian symbols, starting from the strip and up to today's republic of belarus, there are dates for the appearance of passwords. citations are archival documents, that is, we need a very important historical educational program in accessible forms. both academic and about what. you say, let's present right away. everything is ready for us aleksandrovich everyone was killed in accessible academic forms and the academy of academic philanthropic forms. let's announce next week. we already have a schedule ready, we continue. here is the trend that the president has now outlined as an open lesson. uh, social science starts the action of belarus 1 igor alexandrovich marlyuk. uh-huh vyacheslav viktorovich danilovich your obedient servant, which is very important for local historians. we will unite the entire republic in the sequel. here are these e directions, which were designated by the president and we will hold meetings with teachers and students. and well

, people are simple people, i mean, who do not have, just the same academic knowledge in order to talk in a simple understandable language about history with our e with ours. with everyone's interest in history now very much, we have outlined the schedule of the balance sheet to go and see sometime. well, starting from the seventh, we are already receiving requests not only from regional centers, but also to come to regional centers, even a small audience. we are very it is important to reach every internet internet, but we saw yesterday the class president showed the teacher's class mentors see how the meeting was organized survey. yes, at once to all the lesson lecture artifacts, what is important to show the map this is a classic of teaching skill and again in a simple accessible language, and i would not release the plot. we talked on vk. after all, look how the president treats with care and reproach. he did not reproach the historians. well said, there's a lot more to learn

when you remember the bat. and maybe you next generations. this is a snub. us on a lot has not yet been done and not explored in order to give answers to questions and answer, including to our people, what happened in the past, how it was, this figure remains to be explored. vasily bykov , look how neat the president is. designated here is a man is not simple. this is not his political supporter at a certain stage - this is his ideological opponent, but we recognize the greatness of this figure as a major belarusian writer. and this is the attitude of alexander lukashenko to the figure. bykov is very significant, who now remembers tolstoy's political views are narrow specialists, how he spoke during the russo-japanese war, how he treated orthodoxy, he only argues. there, excommunication was excommunicated for everyone. war and peace are resurrection, sevastopol stories. this is the great

legacy of tolstoy if we start digging that dostoevsky was once sentenced to death for petrashevsky’s mugs, this is an important biography of dostoevsky it is important that the great pentateuch of dostoevsky determined european culture, and although important alexander lukashenko to the great writer, but his ideological opponent with what is happening now in ukraine, where it’s just the world turned upside down the union of writers of ukraine calls to cut the great bulgakov out of kiev, the great kievan bulgakov, who glorified this city and, from which it is impossible to separate from kiev. who have you removed from the program? they say this is a threat to ukrainian statehood. what a circle has passed in 30 years, when bulgakov's return to the wide access of the master and

margarita was one of the symbols. that one 30 years have passed since the time of perestroika, and bulgakov whom stalin did not touch, despite his white guard past. they cut out from ukraine from the city where he was born, but vasily bykov of this or the absurdity of the track, vasily bykov is promised ukrainian hydrogen with a heap. this is a variatsky house. well, vasil bykov for us, a rested jarkha. this is the great belarusian classic, one of the most, i would say, the greatest prose writer of the twentieth, a good deal with you, in fact. that's what textbooks started doing, well there is no need to talk about ukraine at all. by september 1, at the pushkin school, the pushkin monument was demolished, which is normal, in which i would like to emphasize, maybe as a side note. yes. eh why? we've discussed the figure of a quarrel a little, but i want to remind you, there was such a fact in the sixteenth year in a coma of the komi republic in russia, yes. they

just at the same time, by decision of the administration , collected all the textbooks that were published with the support of the soros foundation and destroyed them. hmm, because they definitely carried something alien. ideology and it was perfectly confirmed documented proven and absolutely correct decision was made. although we do not fight with books, unlike some, but this decision was correct now the issue of revision. we don't have to bring about this . are all the books that we now have on the shelf they should, as regards revision and in the same way, so that you do not fight with windmills. i mean pro spend, i then w. and why is opposed to free sales or free learning work in belarus is now being carried out by a system created by the council for historical policy. here look, uh, and so we'll get to each tour guide. after all, what happened through the guides, it seems, as part of the civil society, in parallel with the school curriculum

, they tried, uh, to pump in absolutely some kind of scientific anti-belarusian ideas here. we discussed the guide. seen in ar. when they were sitting, we have specialists in stalinist repressions, we will not call them who have never been belarusian in the archive, and at the same time they say some. yes, we knew, of course, yes, no, the fact is that when a person defended his dissertation on repression in yourself. uh, let's say, and moreover, with a relative, as far as it is clear the surname to more coincide with the largest specialist in partridges. and moreover, lies there in the hundreds of thousands. eh, it’s just that i didn’t touch him when he had glue in quotation marks for me there. well, you see, it’s a lie, there is a central archive of the state security committee. we really know the statistics on the repression of a person aleksandrovich let's be honest, here are all the myths. uh, here are these bcs as soon as we take them. here is any

nationalism from the omnislav sorcerer, what they thought of is not what is in the annals about this great character. but the fact that a man of genius about the battle of greenwald supposedly gave birth to a flag, but he was not born there in the battle of arshan. that's when we take them and any myth of probing, which allegedly was a state, but it was not. it really was a paper republic and continues to arseniev and migration, whatever. well, everything breaks as soon as we are faced with the real history of the documents. and we don't need anything. we need to really find a way to choose not to show. well, yes, i agree. well, maybe the lessons of history, in principle commit. although you can listen to infinity, it's interesting, it's not a pity there. i just would like to know what the prosrosa is - it is very important this is the surname that she catches on hearing. i think the viewers who watch our program. some of them ask what you submitted to this variety. let's go now. let's listen to the president's memoirs, how it was and how the

denial of the history of belarus according to version 40 turned out for us. let's listen. this is already my period of the mid-nineties after the collapse of the soviet. when crowds come to us they drove to a totalitarian state and offered me money, they gave me quarrels from the first one, they brought money for historical truth for textbooks, and so on. i honestly sincerity to him, - mr. soros said. so now i remember this meeting. you don't come to us anymore. i will not implement this policy. and that's when i became a totalitarian dictator, then i was and became hated and our country, including for what for what we wanted to write, themselves their textbooks. you know what they were then for what we ourselves wanted build your life to be sovereign and independent. that's how 40 worked for us. by the way, here is the information of the former member of the supervisory board of the belarusian soros foundation. do you remember this alexander of mine

? the person who allegedly won the election against them said that, to be honest, of course , i lost them, people revealed on the square. e people there. then converting-active responsibility was attracted through conscience , stuck after 20 years, decided to tell the truth, this is what we have just talked about with you about the first part of the lecture about historical memory, but for me an important very important accent was when the president approached the map and showed, yes, about the thirty-ninth year, western, belarus, which we then represented and then his message to the audience was a message, in fact, not only to the audience, which was in the hall, which was in all young people do not lose this land. yes , because this, it seems to me, is one of the key points. we just need to add to what the president was saying now. yes, we simultaneously heard how he reacted to soros' proposal. yes and let's say directly, and this was a branch there are 37, that is

, this fund exists in thirty-seven countries today in kazakhstan it has been operating since the ninety- fifth year in ukraine in ukraine if maybe someone does not know, but they say that kuchma won his first elections 1994 thanks to the soros foundation and poroshenko awarded him the order of freedom in 1919 and now we know what's going on in ukraine and we know what's happened to the economy and let's call a spade a spade. this is not a philanthropist naturally, this beautiful word was not attributed to him. he is not a philanthropist, he invested billions very well according to some estimates, 18 billion dollars is a strange one and received excellent dividends from this. because if someone read, uh, dear friend of the kid, yes, he do you remember such a moroccan loan. yes, of course, about which people immediately became millionaires overnight. that is, when you are admitted to the president by the

prime minister and you know political information. you clearly understand where to invest money in order to earn 100 times more and further this money. for earning new funds are brainwashed in the territory where you are being developed by god, he thinks he comes to the young president like a cat, he says, listen, let's agree on this. we tell you, and you say that yes, i'm rudely saying that stalin attacked germany yes there, well, about me, and here they say to him, do you hear, go, are you collecting from the side? clothes. leave. he says, well, everything, then, we begin to change the war. it should be obvious that the ninety-sixth year there is a war of attempt. every time, after all, criticism, quarrel sit not only from us. see. what kind of conflict does he have with victor? the national leader poses a threat. and this doctor evil soros. it's not just this is an old man who has money and who arranged it there. uh, once upon a time, the southeast

asian crisis was behind him. on this. he lived somewhere else - this is a showcase. this face. this is an outpost of this grouping of transnational corporations, for which i need everything. nation -states a strong nation-state really prevents them from getting the profits absolutely put forward. it's not just once. they are propelled him into this important direction. this is the locomotive of this grouping, which sets its goals of global restructuring. people like lukashenka, like putin, like viktor orban, like erdogan really pose a threat to them, and this network of supposedly humanitarian educational programs. they understand through ideology that this is the most important weapon. through ideology, they are trying to put financial control under their control, society, absolutely not only not only mental at the expense of the mental. they get access to national subjugation. by the way, he has already

passed the law on the 16th topic, if we have time, well, one of the uh, ways of sver power and hoisting on the throne in the country, this is a pocket party. listen, this is just a topic, uh, we are seeing ukraine, right now i was literally in the middle east , i want to say how it is possible through what seems to be what should unite history and parties to bring the richest country to devastation there electricity. there is no garbage there, there are sports advertisements on the street, people ride scooters, including shouting party slogans. yes, and ruined the richest country precisely due to the fact that this party struggle was going on , foreign companies invested money, uh, foreign states, because this is a lacquer piece. and believe me, they can do exactly the same with us,

look. i. well, this week's meeting was you saw, i'm in a trend in dmitry aleksandrovich read your article very carefully. eh, as a historian what i'm telling you, that's right. i agree with everything and the biggest fear, of course, we have, it seems to me, from my point of view, that with the help of pocket parties they can ruin the country. it amazing very cheap. eh, there are many tools. uh, examples around us, when with the help of this state. well, here's an example. i was not very familiar with him, but i think that ukraine is one of the clearest examples. here let's, we now look at such a small one. give means we have picked up that to us came, e to a head lately. well, then we'll discuss it like that, uh. in which direction should we move political parties are a traditional tool for external influence on the internal affairs of the country in the absence of clear rules for development the political landscape of the party representatives, with a slight movement of a dense envelope , turn into lobbyists of foreign interests. as a result, government positions are distributed

in the course of small talk by representatives of foreign states, what do you think? and i think that we are in the game about klitschko, he is difficult. but especially the announcement of his deputy prime minister. you've seen some of my notes on relationship problems. we will try to quickly find out what role he plays. i think your argument for him, which you need to convey is the same that you found for yatsenyuk. i'm glad you talked to him about this. i am very glad that he said the same thing as during the meeting. good? i do not think that the nickname is a place in the government. it's a bad idea, yes, in terms of not being in government. let her play games and do political work and other political systems. in ukraine, put on a financial footing. absolutely everything is for sale , every potential candidate knows how much it costs to take a deputy chair information with

prices. is that not published on at the stand in the election commission , not only the oligarchs, but also external players, get themselves pocket deputies and officials, and at the same time they pay. and orders the music i'm driving to kiev at 12:13 raziv and vrezh darkness, into the corners we are about a thousand punny power up to a billion dollars of credit guarantees. i am an utrymov killer. after all , poroshenko tayatsenyuk with dudes to get rid of, trying to the prosecutor general. and they were left-handed. i said we'll bore you with pennies. and you will see such repetitions. you are not the president just for everything you give. i'm such johnny darkness, i'm going through the buzz. i am yours the prosecutor general is not seen until that hour you can’t tear yourself away, this and that is, in the case of the son of god with a villan, a similar situation develops not only in ukraine, external financing of the political system inherent in and notorious western democracy during pranksters’ conversations with a representative of the committee of all prayer for foreign affairs zhigimantos

pavilionis. he admitted. what is an agent of external influence? this is a great tool, nevsky christian democrats. they created us, they created me. i am not their product. uh, it's a big power, similar challenges, the republic of belarus also faces representatives of the so-called opposition constantly interacting with the intermediaries of their employers in the photo, the same pavilion sex chairman of the united civil party of belarus anatoly libeyskaya, a representative of the western democratic supolka professionally dresses the thresholds of offices where they apply for peculiar transformations, belarusian anatoly lebedkov continues negotiations with potential sponsors along with them. we are at the international republican institute in senator mccain foundation on the wall hangs a t-shirt with inscriptions inscribed in this foundation. on it

, the dates of the great revolutions next to some countries are abbreviated dbd. tobidan, what does it mean to be done 06. we are the next belarusians. elections are scheduled for 2006, some ukraine would sit in parliament and that's it. i want no higher, if the money is further, no, i want to say, i remember when i became a senator, which means that i had two colleagues, there was an international conference, it was just in june on problems incl. here on that i came to the conference, and there were two historians from kiev from kiev. i won’t call them by their last name, so that, well, it wouldn’t be worse and the first question they asked me was that a millionaire. and they asked how much it costs. you see, for them it was. naturally, at that time, well, actually, a. but seriously, the most important

problem that is voiced in your story is us . indeed, there is this external influence. and that means external funding. the most important thing is de-party construction. we need to let's be honest let's say another thing is how these parties look and who stands behind them and who finances them. and everything that the president of the country said at the meeting, it boils down to a large number of very simple, clear, sane things. this is the sovereignty of the country, it is absolutely no parties that are financed by any neighbors in our country should not exist, and if this party is requested by one or another or another segment of the belarusian society, then, firstly, it must have significant support. and secondly, all sources of funding should be here if this belarusian business needs the party, after that it finances belarusian business, and there was one more

very important moment, some did not understand, they began to drive a wave such that this is how it is? uh, here is the decision of the all belarusian assembly, supposedly should be strictly binding on everyone. what was the main point. uh, the president just clearly and unambiguously made it clear that all the parties that will work in the belarusian field, which, well, there will appear, uh, they must meet one fundamental principle. they must comply with the belarusian constitution, they must comply with the most important legislative act, and they in this plan do not mean that well, whoever was a communist was and will be who was a liberal, if he is sane liberals he will be the one who is a conservative he will be and has every right to be at the same time. here is the constitution of the country, there is this framework, beyond which it means unconstitutional actions, because what is the problem of the opposition in

many post-soviet countries, and our opposition is no exception, in that for them the elections are not just a legitimate coming to power, and this is revolution. in any case, either a coup, uh, either in a non-violent or violent way, that is, the destruction of the entire paradigm of the development of society, the breaking of the grinding of society, the denial of what we are here. well, listen, read for. it's all here, those present know it, we will piston the history of the belarusian state from scratch, we will znuruy. well. the belarusian nation was born in 2020 and went out of its way. excuse me, this is for understanding, how in the united states yes, everyone there thinks that there is a two-party system there in fact many more couples will not have a single chance that there are no communists in the united states,

even the nazis will not give power to the us, and that's it. i refer myself. and yesterday the president said that there would be two categories, by and large, some would say that now the introduction of a picture of building and there is no such request from below others say that there should be party building and, well, as soon as possible and definitely i consider myself to first category. i don't think it's like we have a second, but a big request at the moment and when i meet people , i don’t talk to people, but people today have a great need for what we have, and there are even a lot of fears. yes , because a lot of people are already represented somewhere in public associations somewhere else somehow, and i spoke about this and i will say it again to a person who today cleans bread, by and large, it doesn’t matter. and what kind of parties exist, he must understand that he has conditions for life, that he lives, cleans bread, that he has tomorrow, that children tomorrow they will go to school on the one hand on the other

hand, of course, as my president said, they promised and time does not stand still. and of course, uh, the party system must somehow develop parties must appear, but the quality of the parties that have appeared is very important here, if we just gathered 500 people, for example, and decided that we need a party and we represent the interests, and which -something of a certain layer and we have sources of funding. not outside inside. this does not mean that we went to register it behind to the law of creation and development of political parties and civil society. it is necessary to approach very carefully , not only to block all possible sources of external financing, which means external management. these political parties we need to think carefully. what should be the structure that will create that other political party, whom it will represent. how many people should be conditionally in this large initiative group, which the founders, yes, who will declare the need for the appearance of this party on and. well, whatever the smallest things should be spelled out, because

this is very thin ice, on which you need to walk on the road, we are discussing. uh, after this meeting we are discussing at various levels. how to build this work is a big discussion. i think it will be and, uh, public discussion. there are two trends here that we must not forget. first, we began to discuss the activation of party building in the wake of the politicization of society in 2020. now, when we come to the adoption of the law. this wave has subsided, not just there is no request, but really, if fears the definition of the party itself comes from the word part, yes. it is very important that the party does not lead to this fragmentation of some autonomous closed, uh, categories that live within the framework. that's just their paradigm - it will just be a disaster. it will be livonization ukrainization of belarus this is not our way the second moment, the whole world is going through a crisis of classical political parties. it

’s just some islands left there in germany look, it’s just leaving, where are these great parties of italy there christian democrat socialists. see what happens with the galic movement e in france, all these two -party definitions. uh, lots of party system. the mass political movements are leaving the five-star ministers from the side of german affairs in general said that she does not care about the opinion of the voters which parties are in question the elite has ceased to hide that it decides everything. look here . well, here we are now talking about what they should be. they just have to be let's. so i'm interested in a completely different thing. how will parties influence my life is much more important and the president said about it, because we are talking about the parties there, that's how they are with the state. this is part of our civil society, which is part of the state. and here is how the parties will

interact with the government. here is a very important question. and this law, probably, should become. we had parties that influenced, uh, life so much, that here people like a swan, money went around, begged, you see. please excuse me for interrupting, but nevertheless, in order to come to the society's request for a political construction, you need to educate this culture of perception of political parties, you pull it, but who? that's when someone says that we have already been brought up, which means fasting. this must be done in parallel. i really liked the way that i read yellow cream from one of the authors suggested creating children's parties at school in general, so that children already at school would understand why political parties are needed at all. and how can they? well, who do they represent, how are they and how do they move through well, of course, listen, well, today review nothing. yes, that's right, we do not teach children political culture. you see,

molodyozhnaya was torn by her colleagues. listen to today's news about political culture , children's parties, everything. there is catherine jean-pierre here - this is the official representative of the white house, but it looks like a long time ago. yes, kuzya that people said that people who voted for donald trump are a threat to democracy, our freedom, our rights, that is, a representative of one party of representatives of another party is an enemy, something else there is something else percent. they did it on a party basis. yes listen to the governor of new york. i wasn't wrong. there is such a post. yes, she said that those who are in the state. uh, voted for trump can be exhausted from uh states to uh, the concentration camps that you talked about became a little bit. i

offer the floor to a professional with experience sergeyevich, you worked in your time. if i'm not mistaken about the law on public associations. once upon a time we even created. yes , there was a time who created politics. well , actually, i wouldn't consider it, i'm of the opinion, probably, igor aleksandrovich and similar in this regard. eh, stick to the second eh yes, the constituents of the matter is that it cannot be considered. here is a political work on political parties. eh, that's very narrow. yes, after all, the president, when they discussed it. whether this topic he outlined a few mandatory criteria, i emphasize.