oleg aleksandrovich hello senator and psychologist professor and leader time requires new solutions and now in belarus this large public organization has a new leader, my guest today yes, one of the main questions. it is asked often and as soon as it concerns belarus, it is always practically. whether white russia will become a party, moreover, a party

in power, or just a party, depending on how you see it, when the president seemed to be talking about it, you need to mature to this in a calm rhythm. here, if you measure steps, at what pace, are you following this goal today, nordic walking or sprinting? but if you develop your image, then, probably, nordic walking, it is more healthy and measured, but it is also much more effective, if we talk about medium and long-term results, indeed belarus has the potential to become a party, this and the personnel belarus is an ideological platform on which we build our activities and our existing organizational and managerial experience. and i think that if belarusian people and the state will need belarus to become a party, then we will be able to do this quite

simply another conversation, what kind of party to be and this is a really difficult question. i would not call belarus the perspective party of power, rather the party of political stability, but the party of national unity, and the party of preserving the historical memory and national culture of the belarusians. these are the e ’s in the future, if this is still a party, we laid, as the head of state said, the movement should be from below, then by and large, there is an initiative from you and from your member, as i understand it, yes, the party, but another important part is naming. well, there is a joke, what does every new leader, when he comes to office? yes, he starts with a rebranding, changes log's slogan, perhaps i will not hide other things that are noticeable to the eye. i also went through this one, yes, let's go straight in case of transition to the party rails. will

the name of the association change, yes, and it is very important how to emphasize the sovereign component of the organization. well you know i think today's naming and today's system of images is, in principle, alive and working, we made small changes to the logo for social networks in order to emphasize a new stage in the development of the association in order to meet the requirements of modernity, but uh, they are of a cosmetic nature of significant importance have. if we talk about the party, then i have a name, belarus personally, if i talk about me as a person, as a leader, i like it. it is capacious white russia, it reflects many of the meanings that are already embedded in our a program in our becoming and, which to a large extent can be preserved in the activities of the party, of course the party will require. uh, new identity. well, the visual of new meanings, but if we

talk about the semantic core, and in this way, i think that we can leave the current name and the system of meanings of images. well, well, if here's a little bit. it's yes to inflate. there are opponents of the authorities, yes, who quite clearly say that no, this name does not reflect the sovereignty of the country at all, they say, like, russia, how would you answer, when this question comes to you. and i think that just uh, it clearly reflects the meanings that should be implemented and are already being implemented in our country. and i think today we will still talk about geopolitics and other dimensions of our modernity, but my deep conviction is that it is not the sacrifice of political sovereignty that the supremacy of the economic sphere is not the sacrifice of cultural subjectivity. we can and must develop integration ties with russia and maintain. here, uh, that level of cooperation in the economic sphere and trust in

political cultural sphere. e with russia and in this sense, white russia as an independent part of the russian world. the name may well exist and, moreover, be relevant and modern. that is, it is in no way connected with sovereignty, in no way agree in the opposition press. why did i ask this question about you, they write briefly, well, it’s not clear the west to russian for people who think, it’s understandable. yes, now there are a lot of texts of a lecture of reflections on the topic of russophiles, russophists , westerners, slavophiles and russian peace. in general, yes, but here is something new, really. here explain, this concept, in general, how much it corresponds to your understanding. i think that, as often happens in the opposition press, he labels me. well, that is, it is so normal in quotation marks, and the approach of our opposition figures is labeling. uh, hmm and ostensibly pilloriing

, although hmm yes it seems in that sense. am i a western russianist or not? this is a big question, but he e meaning of narcism is that there are three unified, and eastern super ethnos e, the russian world, consisting of three ethnic groups of three peoples of the great russian proper, russian belarusian and e, ukrainian little russian. it is clear the reality of the xxi century. made significant changes. here in this construction and therefore today, if we accept this theory, then with big reservations. why is the sovereignty of this inviolability? uh, each country builds its own way, way in the world to pave its way in the world, relying on its own interests and its historical experience at the same time, no one cancels. unity is the language of unity. faith unity. e stories. uh, in general, civilizational unity, and in this sense, i

really do not hide it, that i share the idea that the republic of belarus is part of the east slavic civilization in this sense as well. the actual consequences, such as economic integration , political alliance, and spiritual ties are strong and stable - this is what should be realized in our country. you see our opponents always don't want to hear. yes, when we talk about the fact that the european union does not prevent anyone from remaining sovereign. and here is this one the argument doesn't work, because i don't want to hear it. but, as soon as it is said about the integration of belarus as a sovereign state with russia as a sovereign state, either occupation, yes, or absorption immediately arises, well, for some reason, other thoughts do not arise. let us leave on the conscience of those who love to create or how to reprint us to the post well? dissertation on the theme of east slavic civilization as a subject of modern global social transformations, yes,

right, right. that's all we are now being scientists, we see just how global and painful political and social changes in the world are from a scientific point of view. what is our place for belarusians now in them ? well, i think that this is exactly the old fashioned way, that is, it’s not easy for people to reorganize, the word can somehow stand more or less, it’s clear what it means, but globalization. there is none as such today. e global world turned out to be an ideological myth, which is quite active. it was implemented by the united states and now allies, and indeed there were some dimensions of globalization, and it could be constructive,

creative, attractive for all countries and regions of the world, if it were equal and fair, if from global, but cooperation, but everyone would benefit , if international obligations were based on the legislation quite right. it's like one of the conditions for fair e interactions here in this global world, but the americans, well, and their allies in general. here is the global elite began to build here is this global world. and how is the world. uh, it's like an iceberg where there's an apex sucking the juices out of uh the rest of the world, uh, thriving amid impoverishment. eh, the rest there are seven billion, if we are talking about the gold billion and the rest of the world, in which more and more despair plunges into poverty , into a crisis, uh, political economic state. and the countries, the peoples, their leaders realized that if this continues, their it simply won’t remain on the map of history, it won’t even physically remain, and hence

the processes of counteraction began, and one of these processes is the process of regionalization. here we are not talking about regionalization within countries, but the unification of a country of peoples within some regions. and in this sense, i will once again return to the idea of ​​the need to integrate regional unions. integration unions. today they are a condition of survival. no more no less economic security, military security, demographic potential of it conservation. all this can be preserved, multiplied and developed only within the framework of regional unions of regional blocs, and the place of belarus is that at a certain stage it became a political locomotive for building such integration unions. it was our president, namely the republic of belarus, who initiated the creation and promotion of this. yes, er commonality. today this is already a banality, and today everyone is talking about the need to integrate unions, there are

regional networks and so on, but it is the republic of belarus at a certain stage was the first. who is this or one of the first who started it, and, uh, our president, as a person with a sharpened political instinct, understood that this is the way to save the country. well, i remember how he spoke at the summit. he is not afraid and does not hesitate to say, uh, the problem, but shortcomings, because it is their solution that leads to the strengthening of these regional unions, otherwise they are not viable when they are on paper. that 's for sure, yes, but you know what makes me happy that 85% of the world's population, yes, they are just it is against such a separation of the world against sanctions against restrictions and is really for the creation of normal conditions. let's talk directly globalization. yes, that is, the creation of rules or the maintenance of rules that are now fundamentally violated, but scientific activity here, it seems, this is the background of our conversation. she is understandable. let's

try to work in an interview with a contour on ont e, the press secretary of the president natalia from the fund. she revealed some moments of the president's work schedule. even then, when it seems that no public events are being held, to be honest, it ’s impressive to have someone to take an example from. and here is how the working day is made up of the work schedule of the new leader of belarus well, let's start with what impresses me too. he commands respect for such a pace, especially when you know the degree of complexity of the problems being solved and the degree of responsibility for the decisions made and the preparation is absolutely right for the study of these issues and decision -making, as far as my work schedule is concerned, it is different. for example work schedule mine, as the rector of the university until recently . i worked as a reactor, an interesting comparison. wow, because there you work in a certain location. and there are clear boundaries of this university border, er, the

activities that are carried out in it, the management of social changes, which causes a republican character. and this is very important for me personally. this is, mm, stimulation of activity, stimulation of the development of district and primary organizations in order for our activity to be. only apical promotional projects that we are launching here in minsk somewhere. well, let's not hide pr show. e that the public association lives and works, but it exists in the regions, it exists. uh, in every district and city of our country. and now to reach the primary schools to reach the area in this. i see my task from here, business trips from here, meeting people from here, and an in-depth understanding of what's going on. uh, in regional structures. e white russia, this requires a lot of time and effort. uh, interacting with people. well, another important dimension is the establishment strong relationships with our partners. and these are

public associations of political parties. this is the media. these are state-owned sports clubs, unions, because a public association can be represented and should be represented in a variety of areas. not only in politics itself. but why not in sports, why not in education, and here is the establishment of this system? and also one of the tasks that i solve on an everyday level, but it’s true that we went to work by bike, and before so far. well, not now, but here's the future as rector yes, he went to work in touch. honestly. i like it. you were just one of all those who did not hide in the twentieth year on august 17, grodno is the hottest period and one of the hottest cities. why did they leave? there are several reasons for making this decision. i thought it over for myself, then my behavior was completely rational and responsible for me first. i

think, well, i don't know how appropriate that is. i believe that i am able to learn lessons, including the lessons of history i know her quite well, it seems to me, and the experience of the collapse of the soviet union taught me a lot. i saw it happen. although i was a teenager, but nevertheless then i could watch it live. then i studied this issue a lot and saw the mechanisms of committing this crime and its consequences. and i perfectly understood that we are at that point, uh, when they want to do the same to us, destroy the country, and leave it on its ruins on its ashes to allow this. uh, no way. eh, no citizen. uh, there's a father in any way uh senator. i could not. secondly, i asked you a simple question. and well, i didn't always ask him. i know the answer to it. wonderful. if i well , that took place, it may sound immodest. well , nevertheless, there is a doctor laptop professor senator, how and why it became possible, it became possible, because in our country

there are social elevators that can lead a person who works with initiative, well, not a certain talent to bring to some significant positions in this case. i'm not even talking about myself. it's tens of hundreds of thousands people who have traveled this path both in my inner circle and in the circle of my colleagues. i see it in the vast majority. nobody stood behind. i mean, there dads, moms support and the like is the fruit of the labor of talent, and i should have been grateful to my country and really. i am grateful and in this sense to betray at a crucial moment. for me it was unacceptable. i know that many of those who had, in principle, a situation similar to mine acted differently, but for myself i decided not to merge. how is it now speak? maybe not hide, huh? doing what i had to do well, uh, lik alexandrovich you understand what you are saying, i fully support every word. yes, and moreover, i myself passed, in fact. here

is the path. yes, none of us was born with a golden spoon in our mouth, but the problem is that this is calculated thinking people, that is, when we give such arguments, it is for those who can hear wants to understand. but in fact, an excited crowd came out to you. i remember how crowd it is. sorry a little did not tear the same koranic there, yes, when he was the minister of health at that moment and what was happening, what they said, there was not a single gram of consciousness. and here i am interested in people who do not want to hear anyone, who are energetic. yes , they are just excited so that the mind is overshadowed by emotions. they heard you as you saw it. i think not at that moment, but the best criterion of truth is public historical practice, and i think the last few years, but the last two

years have shown a lot. and those who are able think, at least at a minimal level could see. well let's say so objective reality, and in this sense, let it hurt. let it be very difficult for yourself, but reconsider your views. yes , not everyone could do it, but here at this point. i want to say the following, there really is a problem here. this is a problem related to the rebuilding of society. well, at the beginning of the 20th century, a book was written that became a classic. rise of mars concert. agate is a spanish philosopher, where he put forward the thesis that the mass has come to the fore, it is always was today, it is the main subject of the social life of the political process, and unfortunately, this must also be taken into account, and the mass of capercaillie is a rational argument in logical discourse, and therefore i think to work with this. it is necessary, if we talk about what tasks i set for myself as the head of a public association, belarus, then they are

the formation of the improvement of the political consciousness and political culture of citizens. this is achieved in many ways, but the most effective of them. although the most difficult long time. it's enlightenment well essentially it's the ability to work with the masses. yes they form. i mean in the right direction. well , well, there was a meeting on tuesday, but the president is important. in my opinion. and now i want to touch a little on the party theme, which was discussed at this meeting. usually the role of the party is the majority system. she didn’t flaunt it too much, you know, yes, our president, he always did without intermediaries, not at all with the people and parties, including the party in power, he, in principle, did not need him directly as a backup communicated with the people. he always communicated directly with people and this highlights. its from the very beginning, but from the ninety-fourth year and earlier. yes, even then why, in your opinion, we are now asking ourselves the question of party

building, predicting that these parties can become new centers of power, as the head of state said and structuring society around them, we still consciously go for it why and why, well, first, we must not pretend that the twentieth year has passed and is in the past. he didn't stay. at past. he has had a lot of influence in the present and one of the things he has awakened is a much more developed political consciousness. and this political e, activity in the political involvement of citizens. and today it is already said that society again wants to be in political hibernation. well, too . let's be frank, there were periods in our history when, in general, some major political decisions. well, as if it were not that the society drew, but none of them considered it necessary to actively take part in their e, well, acceptance and implementation of the situation today,

another society as a whole is ready to be the subject of political decision-making. therefore, i think that political parties are like instruments that can channel, e, public energy. this political energy is becoming more in demand. secondly, political parties are platforms that can be another way of communication between the state and civil society. and in this sense, to help. e to the state. how , through the examination, for example, on their sites through uh carrying out personnel work and in the department of talented capable people and proposals, like an elevator. quite right, and hmm, it's a sin to hide. this is a certain issue of social steam. when issues are discussed on the platforms of the party, perhaps even uncomfortable issues for the state, for the authorities there are

certain compromise solutions and, thus , this potential, e, criticism, which in any society is a specificity of modernity. uh, this potential for criticism. it's still going down. i think these well and probably there are also other grounds for intensifying party building. if i even oppose a little, yes, because you said, the 20th year showed not only that there is a need, because there is a certain politicization. yes, there is a need. well, to put it mildly, formalize it in some way, yes, or use it, but for the good of the state. he also showed that there are 15 parties that have existed in the country for two decades already. i personally from all these parties are 15. well, actually in fact, i remember constructively only two. communist yes and the rest of the ldpb either merged or took an openly anti-state position. let's get

straight. do we need parties in the state for which the sovereignty of the country is an empty phrase. and how many parties does the belarusian society need in general? well, it is quite obvious that parties that take an anti-state anti-constitutional position are not needed in society. and it's not just our know-how, or maybe our anti-democratism. what are our opponents most likely to blame. this is the normal policy of any state so that you are not torn to pieces. uh, in order to maintain stability and stability, and for example, i don’t think that in the countries of the so -called mature democracies. although how mature they are lately. uh, a big question, and even there are no questions, for any normal person. it is obvious that democracy has degenerated into anything but democracy. even if we still have this experience, let's see, in the end, there is something positive, probably, there is in it, then the difference between the republicans and democrats and either christian conservatives. in

britain, it will be necessary to look under a magnifying glass if you analyze their statutory documents, thus they are quite in the mainstream. they quite, uh, share the basic uh values, uh, ideologies of their societies, and differ in the nuances of where and how it is necessary, uh, to develop the political system and society as a whole, and in this sense, to say that somewhere there are parties that they want to turn society upside down and arrange there, uh, we'll build something different, a garden city. yes, what, uh, its utopia is nowhere like it, therefore our answer parties are an association that must share some basic principles of the country's sovereignty, territorial integrity, independence. e in external relations and so on. what about the number of parties? to be honest, i don’t even think that we can, well, indicate their exact number, maybe 4 5, maybe 10. it seems to me that the question is that they close the political spectrum so that they

express the interests of large and medium social groups, uh, according to property criterion according to professional according to regional may be a sign. and now, if social groups that have, uh, their own word in society, which is significant for society, will have parties as their voice. eh, as a conductor of their interests. i think in this case, and existence will be justified, summing up such a result. did i understand correctly that ideology can be different, well, liberals , conservatives, communists, it doesn’t matter, they must have a common criterion. it is sovereignty at the forefront of the sovereignty of the state concern for the public interest. and here already the question how tools? yes, i'm different too naturally, as i understand it, there is no connection with the outside world in terms of foreign financing. yes, and playing for the interests absolutely

right. no connection to the outside world in terms of funding, a penny that came from abroad. this criminal should be a crime immediately, this is immediately the basis for the termination of activities. it's not just gene agents. they cannot be caring towards the state. they can only be enemies. of course, we must proceed from the general premise that the world competition writes a lot, mikhail sergeevich gorbachev and i digress a little. you, although this is not a distraction now much from e discussions, but his role there in history and so on. i remember very well, all his e beautiful -hearted reasoning onire, in which we must build, which will be a world of friendship, mutual respect, prosperity not from war, and so on, what did millions of unfortunate people or dead people get as a result? countries rolled under the rink of war of aggression, uh, were prosperous steel uh, countries that now can hardly even be called uh, i don’t know there society. these are some tribal unions. there

is already a war on their territory. eh, all against all and that's it. i mean, this is the package. it seems to me that for any thinking person there should be a fundamental one - we live in a competitive world in which no one will take care of you from the outside. if you protect your own security, your people provide the possibility of civilized development, then it will be, if not, then no good. here, in the context of what you said, the question arises purely practically. should officials and civil servants be party members, what is the situation today, the law on the civil service is prohibited today, other laws regulating the activities of civil servants , law enforcement officers, they prohibit, uh, many categories, and our citizens, uh, to be members of the party, i will express an idea for reflection. it was born relatively recently, if we introduce the norm that political parties stand on a constructive

pro-belarusian one, we will not talk about state pro-popular positions, then, perhaps it is worth thinking about ensuring that all categories of our citizens are members of the party. in this sense, they will not have an irreconcilable contradiction with each other. moreover, the danger is that, for example, ruslan will be a judge when making a decision. well, for example , to lean towards your fellow party member there and will look more loyally at a person who, uh, is close to him within the framework of the ideological program of the party in the event that the party programs as a whole have a common, ideological worldview spiritual and a methodological basis is taken, then , maybe, and loosen this rule. of course, there are also counterarguments. they come down to what i said above, so that representatives of the civil service and representatives of law enforcement agencies act purely, regardless of any other party ideological

preferences. well, so it's not a simple question here, but i think that, uh, at least a discussion of it is possible, well, in any case, it seems to me, until it is formed. this is the kind of political field that we still regard as ideal. yes. uh, don't put the cart in front of the horse, absolutely rushing isn't good. here the president announced at the meeting that there was an idea. delegate the powers to elect , including the head of state, to the supreme council, but they refused it, maybe argue in vain. why the current situation in the country and the world. yes determines the possible viability of such an approach and even the urgency of thinking through this decision. the president is faced with a dilemma that has long been of concern to political scientists, politicians, people who comprehend the political process. it's a dilemma consists in whom to give the right to make a decision to the people or an expert. and each of

these options has its pros and cons, on the one hand, to give to the people. this is in line with the ideals of democracy. this corresponds to the understanding that the people are a mature subject of decision-making in the interests of itself, but there is some danger. it consists in the fact that people absorbed in everyday affairs by professional concerns do not always delve into the complex problems that are submitted to a referendum, which are put to a vote. in the case of, for example, the election of a president in another situation, in a situation of giving the boat to experts, there seem to be pluses people in the subject. eh, people understand the situation. but then here there is some confidence in the people. and then and who said that these experts will not be mistaken? after all, we know situations when, after passing the most partial examination , it turned out that some mistakes were made, and therefore, this is really not an easy situation. it also arose

when thinking about the question of who will elect the president, and i think that despite to the fact that the president said that it was a pity, well, well , perhaps, but i think that it is still more correct that it is the people who will elect the president in the twenty-fifth year. well, it must be assumed that in the future, too. you know, the question is debatable, in fact, but yesterday, when i was thinking about this topic. yes, i myself imagined, firstly, the system of china yes, which is quite viable and absolutely normal, i remembered the united states for some reason. yes, there is also an elector system quite right. they do not want to remember this when they talk about that we are bad. they are fine. they have electors who determine that, too. and, you know, here's a southern example. so, unfortunately, when clowns are chosen, uh. hmm very annoying, that is, a person who has never been involved in politics is not a professional politician. but today it is hundreds of thousands of people and victims of the dead, alas. quite right.

here i am, if a short remark about this, i thought about it a lot and my deep business is that it became a fruit, and conscious hmm now i will formulate more clearly conscious decomposition, and the ukrainian society of intellectual moral social and so, as these years of the decade, the nineties zero tenths of the decomposition of the society of corruption of injustice. yes, intellectualization by fascist sentiments, which were actively introduced. it led to the fact that this society, already morally and intellectually degraded, chose its own kind, and in this sense, politicians, of course, have a huge responsibility. do not omit society in any respect, but strive for it oleg aleksandrovich does not agree with the development and improvement here, i would not like the public association to turn into tiktok instagram, but nevertheless. i understand

perfectly well that celebrities are famous media people. they must be in the composition and as a public association and party. it 's just attractive. yes, they don't shy away from it. not bruce willis sergey shnurov right? you understand very well the presence of a star on the electoral list or in a public organization, it greatly facilitates the work of a political strategist, in fact, the star acts in the role of one of the locomotives, let's do it right today, who pulls in belarus and who else are you , let's say, aiming at in order to attract your organization. you know, we are brother sergeevich. it’s not that i’m objected here, i’ll tell you my position, it corresponds to the following just a few years ago. it would be strange to say that here are bloggers, instagrammers, influencers and so on. what are these people? well, such, well, not very necessary, but time passed and we saw that when it comes to difficult times for society. many of them turn out to

merge ; e at the helm of the harvester. and whether it is in the operating room of the hospital, it will be in the classroom or in the student audience , whether it is in the ministerial chair and honestly and work. it is they that society needs, because society wants and specific people want to eat every day, live in warm, heated apartments, travel by public transport, which they arrive on time. well, and so on and so forth that it seems. all everyday life but it must be done it must be organized. and i'm in that sense, uh, that's enough. i will say frankly that i have a reserved attitude towards the so-called stars when the stardom, uh, is not backed up by professionalism and backed up by some kind of activity, which is necessary for a person and society of a state position absolutely right. state position. in this

sense, who pulls belarus? we have a republican council of 103 people, and i sometimes look at the list of our republican council with joy. these are the people who held in the profession in society in a career. this is the leader of public opinion. these are the ministers. these are prominent scientists, and of course the minister of education. incidentally, speaking of the world champion in listing minister of agriculture was wandering the minister of antitrust trade regulation a number of others. uh, ministers, crowbars, hygienicpak e dermand representatives. this is a whole series of university rectors who are also prominent scientists. well, and many many others. i'm here deliberately not wanting back for you. i answered but didn't want to name names why, to not offend anyone, because everyone is real. eh, real name. well , every name you've given it's worthy. that's right. and so, but at the same time, instagram and tik if we talk, well, about the stars from there very often this is also what

society is from. it may well do. but we still stand on the position that white russia and other public associations should do things that will help in our society, uh, get one step higher and higher and higher debatable you know one simple reason. i follow your approach. i agree, but in my opinion. we may have made a mistake somewhere when these niches that people have occupied. well, let's just say it's not quite a state position. after all, they are quite large-scale and work with young people with children and teenagers. it starts exactly. through these niches yes, through the same tittok through instagram, if let's say this a4 yes or there kobyakov will say that white russia is cool and cool and let's all get together for this mass rally together with white russia, then believe me will come, for sure, several thousand additional, yes, people who will focus only on the opinion of these so-called bloggers or instagrammers. it

seems to me that here this moment needs to be tightened with observance with observance. this is the approach that you have designated the statehood of professionalism. even if it 's in your area. oh, and let's just say the presence of the mind, although i'm probably here, as it probably happens. uh, we don't have discussions. there, we are in solidarity in many respects, in fact, in all positions. well, as sometimes, there is some you can single out one side, therefore, on the other hand, of course, the fact that belarus is a place where, uh, i don’t know about social networks, where they work inform. in the space opposite e, we are aware of the significance of these dimensions of modern society and are working quite actively in this direction. i'm really glad about this, really, because we need to correct the situation. but a few utilitarian questions, yes? belarus today, in addition to membership fees and tickets, you have already touched that it can still be social to a certain extent

lift. and what else can be considered today as an organization or a member of belarus . can they be considered immediately for the personnel reserve? as a potential nominee for a position, including a managerial position? well, let's put it this way, let's just say what goodies in the good sense of the word i emphasize cannot be exactly what you are talking about for a member of belarus, we see all this, and we are working in this direction. but i am deeply gained in the fact that belarus should be exactly this launching pad for a successful career of talented people, especially young people and works in this direction. how is the personnel reserve. e, the training of the personnel reserve determination of the most deserving, as well as members of the personnel, reserve reservists and proposals. e. why would a government agency a need our colleagues to consider them for office? that is, it will be your initiative, it will be our

further initiative. i see for myself and for our organization the task of forming a new pool or not so a pool of new crowbars of public opinion leaders. well, literally now , uh, in a few days we are launching a major project socio-political marathon, uh, 17 facets of unity. it will be held in 17 cities of belarus. these are powerful forums of activists in belarus where people will talk about their vision of the development of our country, party building, the international international agenda, and so on, and the specifics of these forums will not be that we will bring speakers from minsk, but we will ask our fellow activists . e from the primary organizations from the district regional structures of white russia, so that it is they who expressed their opinion as to which direction in which way should develop, that is, they will also become moderators. they will be moderators, and they will be speakers and experts. and i really

hope, and i don’t hope, i am convinced that the result of this forum, among other things, will be the formation of a pool of speakers, who can then take part in republican and other dialogue platforms. uh, get involved in the media, uh, why hide it? and the list of lomov pool experts in our country is not, not very wide, and this bench or the bench of participants can be expanded, and here in this, i see there is still white russia, what else belarus can give its member? well, i think it's a sense of community unity and the joy of participating in socially significant. oh business. this, too, should not be underestimated. it may seem to someone that these are beautiful words, but there is a reality. a layer of people and a very large layer of people who sincerely want to do something for the good of the country for the good of the place where

they live, the people with whom they interact on a daily basis, communicate and create organizational conditions for platform projects to finance this kind of activity. it we can all work in this direction, one little remarque, yes, i remember the words of the president, when he spoke about very specific people, that we did not notice them, and therefore these people were attracted to our side by our opponents. and that's right. i fully support that these people need to be seen, they need to be pulled out, including dragging them into these studios. quite right, because i agree completely, we don't have enough experts, we don't have enough. this applies to all media, this applies, in principle, to public i support watering and i hope that you succeed. the last one is about a philosophical question, more so as just under your previous work. you are not only a statesman. but a true philosopher yes, a professional, i hope, well, i

already felt it, though today's conversation. i remember your statements in the pandemic, when you compared the fight against covid from the west with the first victory, those who love history know what we are talking about. yes. interestingly, our model of fighting covid, which was unpopular at that moment, turned out to be the most progressive advanced and effective as time has shown. how is the west today? it seems to me that he took the path of nietzschelstvo. but it’s already obvious to end like sodom and gomorrah but our current belarusian philosophy, what you know, i fully support you that not only a false model of fighting the pandemic was chosen, but i’ll say more a false model. uh, the construction of civilization, where the theme

of freedom was taken as the center of a-a society is a good topic, uh, outside of freedom, a person ceases to be a person, but imperceptibly imperceptibly it was turned into the freedom of instinct into permissiveness into arbitrariness into everything you want, but not into freedom, which creates and which contributes to the development of the individual, and which was lost from my point of view so that freedom and the development of a person in general be e progressive so that he retains his human dignity freedom must be in complex uh relationships. well, how difficult, that is, subtle intelligent relations with morality, my deep conviction is that morality morality is not some kind of high matter, oh which can be presented at your leisure, but in practice. we are completely without them, uh, without it , we can do without morality. no, this condition for practical success is not in the short term. it is possible, uh, to implement makialism, but the medium and long term e

-outside the moral dimension, including the moral development of the personality of society. eh, don’t expect success, it will definitely be some kind of major failure. in this sense, the belarusian philosophy the belarusian model of building a spiritual culture is much closer to me, why because it is preserved e, the understanding of man as a being and a rational thinker and moral agent. that is, this is the idea of ​​the multidimensionality of a person, the idea of ​​the complexity and interconnectedness of all its components, and in our e, culture, it is preserved from my point of view. this ensures greater progressivity and greater success in the development of the belarusian society. alexander i am very glad that this is our morality, it is enshrined in the constitution quite right. and, probably, the last remarque that i would like to voice freedom is then good when it is not

steps on the freedom of other people, and when it serves creation, if freedom serves corruption, and then it ceases to be what it previously was freedom. thank you for this conversation. thank you, i'm very happy with the result. this is true.

beavers are one of the most amazing animals in belarus, experienced builders, excellent owners and

exemplary family men, their ability to change the natural landscape, the representative of the rodent order is second only to humans, the beaver family has two species. the common beaver. he is a river dweller the atlantic coast and the canadian beaver, which received a residence permit in north america, here it suddenly appears from the water, as it is interesting at first to stick its head out and listen for some time only, making sure that it is safe, it emerges fearlessly a minute later, as the true master of the situation begins to surf the water space. the beaver is a large animal - it is the second largest rodent in the world after the capybara in the eastern hemisphere, including in belarus it has no equal at all. the body length of a river mammal can reach a meter, and the weight is 30 kg. however, there are individuals that are more massive in some cases. old well, well- fed beavers weigh up to 50 kg. it is surprising that the sledges are larger than males

, apparently, and animals dominate the water along the slow flowing rivers and ponds, the banks of which are rich in woody vegetation and without this element they cannot exist on land . otherwise, here the beaver gives the impression of a slow and clumsy scroll. however, one has only to smell the danger, as he gallops to the water, where he sits out. diving. it may not appear on the surface for up to a quarter of an hour to swim up to 700 m during this time. at the same time, the beaver is likened to a submarine in the water with ear holes and nostrils. the eyes are closed by means of blinking membranes, but at the same time the animal continues to see well. if the rodent senses danger, while in the water , it will immediately warn its relatives about it , loudly slam on the water and only then dive. so despite the barely noticeable ears, the hearing of the animal is excellent. and the beaver is the owner of disproportionately short legs with powerful

claws, on the second toe of the hind leg, the claw is doubled, the animal adapted such a feature for hygienic needs, combing its beautiful valuable fur in its time. he almost killed him, there were so many animals who wanted to acquire a beaver coat that the animal was actually completely exterminated; throughout the territory, essentially beavers on nogamny - this means that once united, couples remain faithful to each other. all her life, the female dominates not by chance in their house is always clean and tidy beavers are strict vegetarians, but at the same time big gluttons, because for a day. they are able to eat up to 20. their own weight to feast on the bark and shoots like aspen, linden and willow equal to the beaver

in zlochev's abilities. no, since no one knows how to build dams, lay channels and build huts, which, by the way, are reliable protection from frosts and enemies bears, wolves and wolverines. although the beavers themselves are animals that are unfriendly and useful, their appearance in the rivers has a beneficial effect on the ecosystem, thanks to the dams of the reservoirs, both fish and waterfowl settle . they also help purify water and delay melting, which reduces the likelihood of floods, making the forest inhabited by animals less prone to forest fires. however, nature is not always favorable to rodents; winter floods can lead to a reduction in livestock by almost half, however. at currently, the animal has a minimum risk status, a major threat. for him, there remains a person, more precisely. milliarration measures of water pollution and hydroelectric power plants, whatever it may be, but the

proverb does not kill the beaver, do not see good. today it has retrained into its opposite to kill a beaver, never to see the goodness of being. might be worth thinking about and taking action again.

in the majestic architecture of belarus with a rich history, the witch is scattered on all facades, such attractive windows and mugs round a great window, and arcades with closed niches all this, supposedly newspapers have such a silent dialogue with the believer, popping amazing facts about violin musical instruments to sacred enchanting melodies. she resounds within herself. but like a human voice. it sounds in all

the tv balls of the instrument, a completely different sound is extracted and it immediately rushes into flight and an unforgettable immersion in belarusian art, which has no age, it is in the picture of the gallery named after napoleon orda that every time it dictates its own terms. there are some requirements for both the museum employee and the visitor who comes to watch cultural projects on our tv channel. in belarus, it is easy to explore the starting point of our journey, the baranovichi station. not just a house. he

raised not even chekhov cherry but not i'm ashamed of this word, a real paradise apple garden. landscapes full of thoughtfulness and sadness enchant even the most fastidious travelers. and if there is no such opportunity, the city of belarus is what you need, but for now the whole world in the photographs does not let the leaning tower of pisa fall. i will support finnish in every sense. project on our tv channel and travel online

harvesting company in belarus is nearing completion taking 2% of fields left total loaf will be at least 10 million 700.000 tons 200.000 tons - excellent subsidiary plots. and this is a record harvest in belarus, as stated by the vice-premier of the country. leonid zayats has created a solid foundation for food security, processing is loaded with raw materials, the required amount of food, ready to produce all year round for the domestic market and supply goods for export. already, the

fields are preparing the foundation for next year's harvest. we have fortunately completed these lands and increased slavery by 34,000 from last year's level. now we are actively working, we will expand this group for winter grain, because we see that the harvest of winter grains. you are always higher. then we will go over one and a half million hectares this year, we also began harvesting sugar beets, a fairly good harvest is expected. i think 30 percent will be above the level of 2021. active harvesting of flax is underway. forage is being harvested. agrarians are in their active phase harvesting the remaining part of the crop and preparing the foundation for the harvest of 2023. as a result of this harvesting , 19 districts became leaders in threshing in belarus, including grodno baranovichi and slutsk. belorusneft plans to increase production oil by 70,000 tons at the end of the year , 93 oil and

gas condensate fields were discovered in the country. all of them are within the pripyat trough. currently, 60 fields are being developed, thanks to advanced technologies and a scientific approach, belarusian oilmen. we were able to double the production of black gold at the largest and oldest oil production site in belarus, now drilling and field self-exploration work is growing here following the results of 22 years, the volume of production at the paris field. we will make 30% of all pripyat trough. today it is a field, riga, it is fully equipped with all modern infrastructure and any investments. in the arrangement, they are minimal. that is to say, any drilling is the development of field development on a developed old mature asset, it minimizes investments and allows the fastest from the drilling process to the production process. put the well into operation for the last 2 years, belarusian oilmen have been digitizing all processes from drilling to transportation

digital model of the speech field allows you to control and optimize any parameters at oil production facilities. next year, the mogilyov-elevator will begin to fully operate the program. mash will start producing high-speed elevators. in the work model with a speed of 2.5 m/s. the novelty is intended for the high-rise construction market in moscow, st. petersburg and other russian cities with a million population. the first orders for the enterprise are expected before the end of the year, mogilev elevator. masha is mastering a new line. in connection with the departure of european manufacturers from the russian market, this 85 percent belarusian model uses some electronic components and imported products. turkey taiwan china so uh. well, we're working on improving the localization and we'll get more in time. rack percentage in general technical solutions that were applied here to move at a higher speed