committees the final chord of the celebration of the city day in minsk at 23:00 colorful fireworks can be observed from the svisloch river embankment finnberg orchestra, now not behind the scenes, but the official name of the legendary maestro was given to the concert orchestra. today, the soloists of the group announced this on official social networks, we recall mikhail yakovlevich finger. founded the first concert orchestra. belarus, thanks to the conductor, his musical offspring reached the highest state level, having received prefixes of the national and academic let me remind you. mikhail finnberg passed away in 2021. one and a half hundred athletes with disabilities in small towns will compete for medals at the open national athletics championship in the coming days. the legendary dynamo stadium will host and the belarusians will compete with the strongest athletes from russia, many of whom are world leaders in their disciplines. today, the solemn opening ceremony of the competition took place in the victory park. after that, the athletes of the two

countries took part in an excursion in the museum great patriotic war. guys, the paralympic athletes of the russians are already from the airport, that is, they are surprised, because the entire environment is barrier-free. now it is called the universal environment at the airport plus low-floor buses plus rooms for the disabled, that is, plus, uh, the useless environment at the dynamo stadium of this. well, they're shocked. that is, i'm not talking about the cleanliness of the city, you need to get there for sure. and in the top three i assure you. i have already performed there more than once and well, and this stadium. i really like it. and the atmosphere is beautiful, and well, it’s just the thing to throw and not think about anything. the championship of belarus for athletes will become a control check before the summer games. together with sports,

which will be held in sochi in early october, my colleagues will continue the sports system, see the results of the day in the panorama. i say goodbye and goodbye. egor filipenko leaves the soligorsk shakhtar club and the defender parted by mutual agreement , it is reported that the player has found an attractive option to continue his career abroad. what information was released by the press service miners call ural the main one, coached by viktor goncharenko, the most likely continuation of the football player’s career. volleyball players from minsk started with a victory at the preliminary stage of the russian cup, our team outplayed dynamo anapa in three games. the belarusians play in the fourth group, which plays its matches in tula with rivals. minskers. also are the krasnodar dinamo lipetsk street and yuz guatom from the kursk region next fight, the belarusian will play tomorrow against dynamo from

krasnodar

hello

welcome everyone. who is watching us now, of course, one of the main participants in today's program, died today. mikhail gorbachev and it so happened that this year he passed away. well, i’ll call it bialowieza ’s opponents, kravchuk shushkevich, but, probably, in the current historical context, both gorbachev and shushkevich. and kravchuk, they do not look like opponents. they look like people who, hmm, were responsible for the causes and consequences that russia belarus ukraine is now reaping, it’s clear that let’s say this christian, but about a dead person is either good or nothing, but in this case we are not talking about an ordinary person. this historical person is a person whose decisions influenced the fate of millions of people, and therefore i would like to ask this main

question, probably today, by saying mikhail gorbachev what should we remember first of all? from my point of view, it is clear what is connected with gorbachev? unfortunately, such an identical event with a negative connotation is the collapse or our great society of the country of the soviet union, no matter how cool, but the man who was in power in such a huge country failed to ensure its successful further development. and that perestroika policy was not thought out, it actually turned into chaos and the collapse of the country. or it was incredulity too high gullibility indecisiveness in itself. gorbachev never understood what he controlled, that is, according to the degree of complexity. he didn't understand. how difficult the system was, the soviet union did not want to understand this, let's say, and it was absolutely convinced that, uh, western values, like they are sold as they are on display. they are what they are, in fact,

we know perfectly well that this is quite a word, perhaps, once. in which he could take a word when the first thing that comes to mind with gorbachev is just the photographs, where fidel castro looks at him fidel castro already knows that gorbachev sanctioned the virtual elimination of fidel. castro is looking at him. in general, one absolutely expressive such photograph is very famous. well, gorbachev, in fact, his role, confident speaks of democratic values. that is, this is my first association, which pops up with this, that, uh. hmm you can even note such a moment. eh, they probably don't talk about him, but it should be said that it was the decision of the politburo to nominate gorbachev to the post of general secretary. what did they come from. it seems to me that they proceeded from the fact that he is the youngest in the composition of palettes. it was a

mistaken decision, the man was not prepared for leadership. such a huge superpower, so this is also one of the possible lessons. everything we see now is not only on post-soviet space the tragedy in ukraine there in europe about the whole world. these are all the consequences, the actions of practically gorbachev, and for me gorbachev is an example of how important the personality factor is in history, that is, how important it is, despite the huge number of reasons that we all know about the collapse of the ussr, the internal external hybrid war that the ussr waged for many years . still, the factor of the first general secretary. he played his part. i am convinced that if someone else had been in his place, history would have gone in a different direction without there would definitely be a different aleksey sergeevich in good time, because, in fact, gorbachev is also such a collective image of those who were in power in the soviet union at that moment, isn’t it, yes, but there were still people, i’m convinced that everything - i agree with my colleague that he did not

have an understanding of what he was in charge of, that this sphere was a power that was constantly in tough opposition to the west. and i think that he is now i thought he watched a lot of his last interviews. of course, i could not admit some of my mistakes completely to say that i am to blame for this or that, but i saw, at least in many interviews, it was felt that he understood what everything had come to, and he saw, and now, probably, something good that russia stood up. i think that he managed to see that russia got on its feet. i think it owed him, as it seems to me, well , somehow the mood understand this topic before the program began. there is in this, however, some kind of metaphysical fact that all these people whom we have listed kravchuk and shishkevich and gorbachev, they turned out to be centenarians, and i don’t know if this is a reward, or kara is what they saw as a result of the decisions that were made then many years ago. well, if what to add to this,

well, i would like to say that, of course, with the death. the era of the soviet union is leaving gorbachev, and in fact we are already noting that we will still feel the consequences of this era for a very long time, but at least during the 21st century this is unambiguous. well, of course, it’s impossible here, uh, the epochs of both the roman empire and uh other empires have gone too far, but nevertheless we live. today we are building our e, sovereign independent state today and we remember the difficulties we faced when we started to create an independent belarusian state on the ruins of the soviet union when there was practically nothing. we had only our e people, who were our leader and

thanks to the political will of our leader. this is another lesson. and i agree. with oleg sergeevich, it is impossible to overestimate the role of the individual in history. nevertheless , at this historical stage we see two antipodes. a man who actually stood at the origins of the collapse of a superpower and a man who created a sovereign state in 30 years. i think another lesson quite important gorbachev showed how important ideology is for the state, because once the ideology was broken, it was worth questioning it, it was worth abandoning it, and it turned out that the soviet union had too few reasons to remain in its former state. that is, he simply signed an informal ideology, how important oddness is. that's what we're talking about all the time we talk and the president demands more so that we don't have a formal job. there are a number of

events and window dressing that we are doing something there in a patriotic way. what happened yes i remember i was very young in those years, but i remember very well that our komsomol organizer. every month he gave a report on the work done at the school where i studied. it was huge. to work on papers, but in reality we saw what was happening. we are the generation of 40-year-olds, i consider it to myself. this is the generation that grew up just the same on the ruins without ideological installations that just collapsed, we saw this lie, the comsort says that everything works. everything is fine. everyone feels great, but in reality, nothing and the same capsor on weekends. i'll tell the truth in the basement playing these films and taking money from us there , uh. here, so that it was i would like to note that such a moment, that here is our example, the belarusian prime minister, it just says that, in principle, the soviet union had a future. we did not abolish those values, the most useful

things that were in soviet society, we preserved and developed them further, that is, our example shows that a lot depends on who is at the helm of the state. yes , it means that the ruling elite has what it is set up for and such a future could be of its soviet advice, if not for one of the examples that echoes from the twentieth. and with all the events in the post-soviet space, it’s so scary when we start building, that we decide to build something new, having decided to destroy to the ground everything that we did before, so we saw that the way this one is nowhere. that is, before you even start building, millions of people will die, how many beggars there were then and what they had to go through just to start building, and what kind of people were the most important thing to destroy everything, and then there will be some new great country and let's tell the truth . we are constantly being told this idea and now struggling, for example, with our history, what they want to convince us about, what we have in our time for 100 years. we didn't have anything good for 3 days.

the belarusian people's republic is proud of everything. nothing more. tried to say another one of the lessons, and the cutscenes. yes, in principle, it is also in the collapse in that deplorable outcome, but of our super power. we have now actively begun to engage in party building and the formation of a real civil society. uh, so we must also learn a lesson, learn this lesson, when in fact the party, probably, uh, if not from above rotted and uh, there were no leaders from that party of the huge party there were 16-18 million communists. that is why it is also necessary that we develop this idea. very correct. after all, the thought once the day before, the president held a meeting in the palace of independence and they were talking about how to carry out the transformation in order for them to strengthen

the state, they rocked it, and discussed bills that relate to the development of civil society. development of the party system. at some point, just the presidents said that, probably, now is not the right time to engage in this process, but they promised once they promised, they must keep their word, and this is one of the key thoughts. which sounded, it seems to me that she is just coincides with what you were talking about, sergei anatolyevich, the party is power, and it attracts both idealists and political and adventurers, so approach this issue. it must be balanced, stimulating the activity of the party that is useful to the state and building a rigid barrier to those of them who will be aimed at wrecking, these are the adventurers who were they immediately abandoned the party. they immediately voted for the rejection of the corresponding uh chapter of the article in the constitution of the soviet union, and the guiding the role of the party. that is, i just wanted to bring to this idea that party

building really needs to be done in a very careful and balanced way, it should come from life and see who appears at the top of one or another party. what are the attitudes, values, political attitudes , do these people stand for sovereignty? the state is guided by the line of state ideology, that is, the people usually support the voters or well, here we see how the people really are what is commonly called the people of the electorate. e people. here they are they watch, they see that i like to influence them, they can’t influence much in ukraine, so it was like the united states, can there be such a body as the vns? yes, the entire belarusian people's assembly is ready for such an examination. i could carry out, firstly, of course, the legislation should work, it was in the soviet union, but it was not observed, so to speak, but those structures that were supposed to exercise supervision. they have eliminated themselves a very good topic. you understand, so let's take the ussr

here. today we give parallels to today's belarus. uh, the first thing yesterday the president said that the parties are public organizations. they should not contradict their activities with the constitution of the country and the course that the country has chosen, remember the ussr how many political parties of public organizations did it turn out there? they did not just oppose the constitution of the ussr, which made radical proposals and legally acted on the territory of the soviet union, this, by the way, is not democracy. this is the collapse of the country the second moment. what did the president say that the reform of the political system should not lead to the destruction of the political foundations that today is again an example of the ussr, we again return to the past. when we already talked about this, we approached a radical political reform. everything collapsed to destroy easier than to create something and the third moment. still. why do you need to do this? this is again the lesson of the ussr one-party system. with all its benefits. it also has disadvantages and disadvantages - it

loses feedback from the president about this society. yesterday i also said that we must, on the one hand, be monolithic and in no way the case does not shake, because these are beautiful words democracy of different opinions. it is very easy to transform into different groupings. inside the country. we see this in other countries, including. parties that turn into a rumor of the oligarchs, which turns into a rumor of certain political centers and do not work for the people, but only for themselves, on the one hand, we need to think about it, but on the other hand, parties, public organizations, civil society and the crown of all this is all belarusian folk assembly that will sum it all up will become a mechanism for real feedback with people, where you can criticize, where you can discuss and propose, and most importantly, do it, because in my opinion a political party is a structure that not only offers, not only speaks about what is needed to do in her opinion

and strengthens the country, but also makes an important point, yes, and the party in order to be functional and useful, it must stand firmly on its feet, and on the ground, and standing on the earth means being tied to a certain sector economy. after all, on in fact, historical, if we stand from the very beginning, the party is a subject that brings together the interests of industry, the interests of the electorate and the state. this is such an intermediary that maneuvers between three large subjects. it is extremely important, it is indispensable, because this party's task is to explain why politics should be spent on this, this activity regarding the withdrawal in the distribution of resources. yes, that is, it is like a joint stock company of all citizens. so, accordingly, the party explains, why this sector is a priority, or vice versa, it is not a priority, and in this case it is really interesting to watch these problems of the belarusian opposition. all the time there was all the post-soviet time, and absolutely

zero attention to the economy, they absolutely understand. what is it, but the idea that it will all regulate itself and will e, function does not happen does not work does not work the system does not work like that. so , when the party is tied to rea. interests she stands firmly on the ground. she understands what sector that brings? how do you contribute it. e into the economy, then there is something to talk about, then a very understandable and meaningful political process arises. there is something to talk about. one of the most resonant moments at the meeting was resonant, especially in those opposition media that followed the president's speech. let's listen to him, you know, more and more i come to what i moved away from, uh, at the time of the adoption of the constitution well, maybe a new generation will come to this, you will come representatives of public parties. uh, i studied the system of party building and the election of elected bodies. e all over the world.

uh, we didn't risk in vain to invite people to elect authorities, especially the president of our belarusian people's assembly. we are wasting the presidential election - it will rock the situation. look at politics and party activities in china, and so on, this is also professional work, that we have more than seven million. how many voters do we have there? are they so immersed in all these processes in order to consciously decide somewhere, after all, this is a professional and there are means of society, a professional political one would be belarusian for everything people's assembly. they elected the president that today he is elected sidimping at the entire chinese people's assembly in the snp, that he has no powers yes, more than me and putin put together,

the absolutely correct statement of our head of state regarding what people should know means, e those people whom they elect, yes, it means to understand what it means to make a responsible choice with our history, if we turn to it for the slavic peoples, in principle, it was typical when it means, uh, people put forward those whom they know from the point of view sociology is the best option, when it means 4,000 people choose someone from their environment. and then this chain. it can continue, so, uh, or reach the leadership of the state, it doesn’t seem like, uh, which is valuable in our uh, belarusian model of social development. this is what we seek to learn from our history. the same mechanism. e. this means the functioning of the entire belarusian people's assembly. after all, its roots go back to ancient times. this is the richest historical experience of our ancestors, which we in the modern level we use now. yes, i understand that

you, like a real politician, have chuiko, you know what will happen later, but you need to formulate an idea for yourself so that we, as it were, clearly follow this line, and opponents say that yes, about the entire belarusian folk meeting. everyone understood that this is really what is from the people, but how to take away the right to vote, so that the chosen ones can choose, which means the most important thing . that the electoral system for presidential elections may not be the same as it used to be, this is not an experience for democracy. it 's not a freedom experience because they never win. not in such elections, not in such elections, not in such elections, because we saw this very well in 1920, when the president confidently defeated the question of another concern for seeing whether belarus is going. way, and i took the words of the president. here is how the president constantly says that we should not blindly copy any country, and even in electoral law. we have not gone down the road now. uh, other countries, we take

something good, but we go our own way, for example, the constitution we did not accept copy it in the west, copying it in russia copying somewhere. why do we have our own history, our traditions, our foundations for 30 years, and we wrote the constitution from the people from the earth. the president speaks on the presidential election. but is the presidential election in the navy less democratic than direct elections. and why is the example only thrown by someone caught the president knows that and in many other countries, including europe yes, remember, under the united states of america in the united states direct but perhaps in the european union, here is one that gives us an example, perhaps such insanity as we have, that a person simply woke up. no education, no career, and he says i want to be president. yes, no, this is very important, german chancellor scholz, just the other day, declares that the european union needs to prepare for the fact

that it will have 30 or even 36 member countries . in that case, it would be more convenient make key decisions unanimously. yes, yes, as it is now, but by a majority vote, so that individual countries could not impose their veto, there was a clip to decide to say so, please stop hiding that there is no democracy in europe, there are no direct elections either, or do you choose? where did macron come from, where did kachinsky come from? show me at least one housewife there or this same homeless person from the street, how we have this electoral law that needs to be changed for the president of the presidential election. it is not acceptable for a person to wake up and say. i want to be president. this is not in any country. there is no peace, but it pushes us. i was not a deputy, i wasn’t a minister, i wasn’t a governor, i didn’t go through the economy, and i want to be president, and those countries that don’t have this are pushing us, close to none. they generally have an idiotic system. they have a manager

behind him, there are elites who decide everything, and he tells beautiful pr videos, and we see what this leads to in europe. political organization, which in fact . look at the coal, another station in germany was launched, they say, it’s fine, it’s okay, they applaud the ecology, we’ll survive normally. the main thing for putin will get worse. and what will happen next will be drowned with manure, they will applaud everything, everything will be the whole of europe in smoke, but he says to putin it’s bad there, he died, no longer, he didn’t die. oh well, he’s still a little more tolerant of ukraine. how much money has already been given to the prime minister of ukraine admitted $ 9 billion , but we didn’t collapse, it wasn’t russia or belarus that imposed sanctions. that's what it is politics and the president talks about this, right? yes , if we talk about democracy, how it is actually based on the presumption one of the presumptions that an incompetent majority can be taken by a competent majority, but we do not elect by vote a doctor who

will perform an operation on our russian eco i would recall here the history of the christian church, which began standing on the choice of the pope in direct democratic so far with the elections. damas dads. it's not over massacre when you cut out the pool, rome and then the principle of straight lines elections. there was a principle to ride with me, and when a competent minority in the person of bishops chose from their midst who had the experience of having the captain of the first epic. yes. that is, what was then implemented in the united christian church. yes, at that time it was somewhere around the third fourth answer of our era, that is, in this regard, in the configuration, there is just nothing wrong. this is a good thing. it is she who minimizes the costs on the one hand directly of their elections. and there is a pre with direct elections. uh, such a direct election is impossible without sufficient resources. and if we look at western terminology, it's common to say, uh, politician or political actor. and what is the difference between

political actors, he does not happen without directors, to whom he owes money for the election campaign, and the political figure the one who, therefore, is on his own, is political ideas. yes, trump is a political figure, and a schoolgirl is a political actor, an important point. we started talking, but as the president was thinking, he emphasized that the constitution already accepted. in this case. this is just a thought and an important addition. he felt that many people would definitely tense up after such reflections, and therefore he made this, uh, a remark, a remark. let's listen , the second time was that they would start accusing me that i'm afraid there, i want people. i'm afraid to hold on to the seat of the people. here i will gather my people and they will elect me. never again was president. i have no such goal and never will. i'm already fed up with the presidency. so, uh, it’s not the main thing, my task is to maintain power there, as they say, completely

no such problems. this should worry you more between the topic, here we go further, and new data from a sociological study appeared in the media, in this case they pay attention to the level of trust. this is who the belarusians trust and how, for example, and in the army , according to the law enforcement system, the president’s government has a very high level of trust in the president, more than 76%, uh, such data, if you think about this topic, what we see is that the army is essentially like this military-political course, the government is the economic course of the president. well, like this global strategic course, and we see that, in general, the figures are comparable for each of these positions. consistently high, what is the secret of such solidity? it seems to me that the secret is primarily in the policy pursued by the leadership of our country and, above all, the president of the republic of belarus alexander grigoryevich lukashenko about politics - this is directed in the interests of the majority of our people and what is happening now in the world, our people are wonderful. they see it. how

important is it to maintain a strong sovereign state that works in the interests of the majority of the people and not succumb to attempts to influence the negative destructive from the outside the same thing. here is the mechanism for bringing in the so -called western democracy. in our society, after all, this is not a good idea, what is it aimed at by expressive colleagues. today they said, but it is actually aimed at the collapse of the state and society and the imposition of external will, including on the territory of belarus, so, here is what we see now, of course, no one talks about this in an ideal society, but very much has been done and done first of all thanks to the position of our president, it is very important who is at the head of the state and it is very important that he has formed a well-functioning system of government, which is also a military component. because if we do not want to feed our army, we will feed the army of another state and, accordingly, we will not be able to to protect their interests, if we are talking about the economic component, then the economy should also be aimed at the well- being of the majority of our people. we have this, yes, with all the costs and

other things, but we must understand that our country. unfortunately, we are not rich in resources either, such as oil-bearing tails or gas tails, which we can sell and live off of. and we live thanks , first of all, to the potential of our people, our people and the correct political course, the leadership of our country has adequate numbers. here i travel around the country as a deputy, which means that i communicate with people almost daily, and i will tell you that everything is logical in the conditions of sans hybrid pressure, the country is consolidating. here, if you take the power unit, that's the whole whole the country was struck by the high-profile murder that took place in orsha, which the president reported, he was under his control. after all, what does it show? you look around. things are going on and we sometimes forget about these basic security principles that the power structures do not provide. how many this year the previous terrorist attacks about it? maybe they don't talk much. how many sabotage was prevented this year. how much murder is hidden. how many robberies, how many robberies were prevented

by law enforcement agencies, people appreciate it, and for all this is worth the economy, because without the economy without the economic bloc. and why the economy people trust the government everything they see somehow know. it's so much more it won't end. how many sanctions. how much pressure has not died, and oleg sergeevich is completely worth president sergeevich do i understand correctly that when, for example, the ukrainian deputies goncharenko threatens there, and the belarusian president, in fact, he challenges the entire belarusian system fairly. that's it. it's a triple balabol criminal so, and when i read this, it's just balabol by and large, a political criminal. why? he is doing bad things to the ukrainian people, not to us. well, we insulted the president. we filed a case, of course, meaning, what are those who stand above the ukrainian authorities there in the west, because the ukrainian people love belarusians, the ukrainian people appreciate what they have done for belarus for ukraine over the years. and even now about goncharenko, the traitor, scum and balance

of the president answered, just the same to those who put it in their heads. here are some potters. uh, these are the meanings to invest quite consciously and completely definite whole. let's remember the words, the head of state, which he sometimes knows how to formulate very clearly, simply and understandably, so that everyone can hear it, even, probably, without a special translation. they must understand that no helicopters and planes, if they go to the aggravation and do not save even more, we once with putin and through declared that we were converted and belarusian. the plane so that they can carry nuclear weapons, well, what do you think, we are the language lyapali everything is ready. let them think, i warned them. god forbid some serious provocation against belarus targets. we have defined decision-making centers, we know them. yes, but speaking, again, about the growth of trust, because it appeared and compared with the

twentieth year. yes, there was an opportunity to compare. and how does it happen when it happens differently, when power does not appear to be in power, how does it happen when a country ceases to be a subject? yes and it is clear that everything is known in comparison, when there is an opportunity to look. and how is it happens badly. and how catastrophic it can be, that is, naturally, what is, begins to be appreciated , especially since demonstrative power is demonstrated, and consistency is firmness and logic. that is, it is clear that it is clear why it is clear, like everything else. in general, again, the firm word of the earth and the firm that on its own land. now, if you say e to translate it into a simple folk language, yes, then, as they say, among the people, everything is known in comparison, that is, we compared it, and we continue, yes, we continue compare here. uh, on the other hand, of course, uh, here uh, it is necessary to speak. oh,

uh, again, about what the authorities, of course, did, the corresponding conclusions after 2020 began to work more from society, uh, but everything is based on the economy and the president from matches with food from speech speech. he says that everyone needs to work in their place. uh, on the other hand. i would like to emphasize that a new impetus was given to e in union building in relations with the russian federation, and this whole situation, which associated with ongoing hybrid attacks. of course, it creates the necessary external conditions for us to study more. concrete issues that concern people are concerned about, and people are also concerned about,

and perhaps in the first place, security. i am also a senator. uh, i travel around the country a lot. uh, receptions of e citizens and uh, v. first turn. here i was recently in a good fellow, by the way, and the first question that was asked. but will we be calm, will we be safe? here we are in such a region, and shevchenko wrote at that time. you know, remember, a deputy of the people's dynasty of ukraine came, who is now so much a staff member of this intelligence service, or not a full-time 200, how many wagons of humanitarian aid were stolen there, that is, there is a war going on, they write something about our country. let's talk about that, what a common threat. i ask you to just start answering this topic. this, of course, is what is happening around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, we saw another blow, mm extremely disturbing. situation volodymyr rogov, a member of the head of this military-civilian administration of the zaporozhye region, again and again

again calls for common sense reminds that one projectile or one rocket is enough for this rocket or projectile to turn into a dirty bomb. why does zelensky need an ecological catastrophe ? zelensky does not need an ecological catastrophe. the united states needs it. america zelensky does not solve anything. but the americans will not give a damn about europe, all of europe. after all, if there is a collapse of this nuclear power plant, it will not give a damn. they are just, because it is completely located completely in this position, the second. what do they want to do beautifully blame everything that russia has done about a nuclear catastrophe in europe, they will arrange this provocation for her. i read one encouraging piece of news, because i don't trust international organizations right now. we can clearly see how they work in two ways. they, uh, we see on the example of our aircraft. the story of our plane landing in minsk, when they put so much pressure on international structures, what they didn't

know at the beginning of the year, what to say? we will not say something or decide something, as such everyone understands to say nothing. i'm scared so well i heard the good news this morning that gt insists on permanent missions to the station is a little reassuring to me. well, i , too, found it sad that all hope for the power of russian weapons that will ensure the safety of the power plant no longer believe anyone agrees with those. who claims that the loss of energodar and the zaporozhye npp is a key loss for ukraine after which everything ends. that is why they are ready to do anything. this is minus 20% of ukraine's electricity, which is a lot, but it's not a fact that it's catastrophic. imagine the ukraine of today's kiev leadership. maybe there the scale is much more modest than those from which we proceed. it will be absolutely not about the country that we are used to seeing before, it is

actually an ecological disaster. there is a goal of today's united states and to leave europe under it, yes, that is, now europe is going bankrupt due to high prices for valuable energy resources, it is clear that industrial assets will be bought up first of all by the americans for next to nothing. generally absolutely logical. this is a raider takeover, which, in general, will now take place, when one control is added to the political one and will be added economically. that is, here in this regard, the united states proceeds from the fact that if there is also an environmental, that is, a nuclear catastrophe , pollution of the territory of europe to, uh, actually sponsor in other areas. them. we need to resist china it is necessary to resist russia and here it seems, as a problem, it will already be more or less closed. nothing will grow from here, therefore. their logic is understandable. if we take the logic of the kiev leadership. here i ran into one unusual

video, but, as unusual as usual for the ukrainian space, where it was explained that the buddha was a ukrainian and that genghis khan was called bogdan actually. that is, well, the fact is that it is in this and in this everything is verified, right? that is, in this regard, you need to understand that today's ukrainians are as close as possible to sectarianism. and generally. this is probably a very fair characterization that we are now seeing when they run into the pope for not condemning the russian federation at first , uh . , the prices of the carpet and cause this, that it is sectarianism that is happening, this feeling that you are the bearers of truth in the final instance, and you have the right to teach the rest of the world. how to think well? yes, this is not quite a normal state for mom, but on really. yes, listen to the masks and dropped. the same applies not only to religion. and they already say in sports. let's recognize the sport. not outside, politics. sport - it is necessary to condemn

russia, and it means to judge, uh everything that concerns russia belarus and if we return, look, when grosse went to the directors. but he writes that the day has come, the mission to support the assistance of the zaporizhzhya npp is already on its way. we must ensure the safety of ukraine's largest nuclear facility europe i am proud to lead this mission. now i will ask destroyeroff to show a photograph of the mission that was being put forward. look here, why does it feel like a poster of another marvel movie why does it feel like grosse feels like captain america why does it feel like they went there to the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant participated in some kind of adventure or well, can i choose another movie? yes, there from the gladiator, those going to death greet you. why do they play instead of resolving issues while they still have at least some power in their hands to deal with, just the same in my opinion, the key is a feature of the so-called western society, when it is mostly politicians, it means

that they are ruling or they are working on a picture of some external attractive picture. but in fact, what hides away behind this picture, and hides absolutely negative absolutely venality does not correspond. the interest of their peoples is the ruling elite that western countries have. i would say more, so, uh, everything that we see in ukraine and what is happening in the european union, it clearly shows that these countries do not have sovereignty, and they act for its years in the interests of their states of their peoples, and for the sake of the interests of those overseas owners of sponsors who personally give them the opportunity to make some profit, but this profit involves a policy directed against their own peoples, in fact. we clearly see this today in western europe. and in ukraine , it is generally unambiguous here that what we say is actually the ukrainian leadership has turned. as you said in the sectarians. well , this is really how it lives in some kind of its own world, it believes that, because they act at the behest of washington, this is all right. and the whole world, which has united around washington, must unequivocally

support them, and therefore the reaction. here they are experiencing shelling, but it's all just those who sent the mission, rich international structures. the united states is also needed there, so that how many more are involved, give the command not to bomb the height. let's call zelensky. in what you see in lies and deceit, they themselves bomb their own, that is. here, call zelenskaya. say stop bombing. uh, the elder is on a mission. they don't. they got the general, they don't call anyone, they don't do anything, that is, there is a picture. yes, but there is another nuance to this. er, of course, the megate's mission. mgtein's visit to the station is probably one of the last chances for this organization to survive at all as an international organization. after all, what is the united states doing lately. well, destroying the entire world order that developed after the second world war. they destroy the system of international security and international organization. well , today the united nations is already

practically under external control. management. uh, the west well, maybe, here is another security council that remains. and this is the only veto instrument that allows you to preserve sovereignty, uh, the russian federation of the people's republic of china, uh, the wto practically does not work. e. os. ho can also be said to be destroyed. here is the magatei, uh, an organization that, yes, they have their last chance. another very important conversation. a very important sign of our time on the example of what is happening now in ukraine, stay with us. we keep going on really important sign such hmm of our time on the example of what i almost said evolved evolved, but the passat essentially degraded the ukrainian

government. here, look at paid power plant strikes against their own prisoners of war in yelenivka. well, what we regularly see when civilians become a shield used by the armed forces, azov and so on. and now you are watching the independence day of ukraine and instead of some patriotic videos that raise the spirit of the people, i will ask you to show the video through which has spirit. even yes, thanks were compared to her by the spirit of the isis. oleg sergeevich and when and why did the ukrainian regime switch to terrorists, when the ukrainian authorities began to flirt with nationalism, because everything started harmlessly and security began much earlier , from the ninety-first year. at the beginning of ukrainian power. it seemed that nationalism is a good weapon in order to strengthen its power, then in the fourteenth year, the ukrainian government and the country finally

lost sovereignty, going to the external control. and jin called radical nationalism terrorism, which turned into fascism and extremism. it is no longer controlled by the ukrainian authorities. he is already independent of the ukrainian authorities. this is what the national question and belarus are for these 30 years. here is our achievement. we must talk about this every day, because i traveled all over the soviet union, as my colleague, the countries that were not allowed. on a religious or national basis, this is the most terrible question. in general, a national question. the most terrible of them on the fingers of the hand can be recalculated, because the national question, if the country was stirred up back, it is almost impossible to return, and another crime of the ukrainian authorities was added the other day, when for the sake of pr they staged an offensive in kherson, when it doesn’t matter how much we already know the numbers called it an offensive. but you are, in fact. this is reconnaissance of the battle, but at the same time the

number of ukrainians who died. look they don't care. it's just that the main thing is this offensive. why did they sum up the crimean meeting? so it was necessary to show that the ukraine project is alive for the west, this is something to show and the price does not matter. that's what is terribly scary, that human life has turned into nothing, just nothing, and this is wildly scary, because we are belarusians. well, we have relatives. how many in ukraine i have relatives in odessa in kharkov, it hurts me to look at this, what it has turned into and i think that, uh, we will continue to do everything so that there is peace and we only do and notice me, uh, more and more votes. and not marginal already there on television channels specialists appear on large media platforms who begin to pay attention to something like this. here i am offering a fragment of israeli tv and the well-known israeli lawyer mikhail finkel is commenting on

one of the telegram channels. i think that many have already seen it, but i think that it makes sense to repeat it, please, 36 times in the presidential only ukraine voted against israel, its heroes are petlyura, who killed 200,000 jews. this is shukhevych. this is e. ss is bandera, this is a trick that said that all of all jews need to destroy yaroslavsky is khmelnitsky, who killed 300,000 jews. every year in kiev there was a parade of the ss hallucin galicia division and our foreign ministry protested against this scum. this is a neo-nazi regime, it turns out a little. i say, yes, i know how, i caused half of the family not to be killed by the bendera and petliurists in the petliura pogrom. it is the heroes of ukraine who erect monuments, the street calls them this is not russian propaganda, but these are the words of russia of the israeli ministry of foreign affairs, the most ancient wisdom, who do you look up to and turn to, here is

a vivid example whose heroes what kind of people are heroes and in what turned this power in ukraine , which was equal to them, i would add one significant point as a historian, that the roots of everything. this is what modern ukraine has come to. yes, they lie here of this bandera, but bandera. she drank somewhere else, if as history i can say that even in the australia of the hungarian empire, here is this map of ukrainian nationalism. it was played out artificially supported in order to oppose the russian empire. this is one moment further, if we take the soviet period, then we must to say that those bandera who survived. this means that they were placed in soviet camps, and then safely released by khrushchev returned to ukraine. the soviet government provided the opportunity for those ukrainians who were abroad to return to ukraine in the united states in canada. and these people who returned, so they received, everything to me of soviet power, and not slowly began to move into power structures back in soviet times

in ukraine, and then as a result we are reaping all the fruits that we have today in ukrainian society. uh, there’s enough yes, a very long story, if we remember the story, well, i won’t say ukraine, but again, from the earth on which ukraine is located today, yes, it’s a terrible civil split almost half a century long, even more than a ruin of a colony. yes, that is, when a actually went on exterminating each other, and the extermination was absolutely uncompromising. yes, that is, petliura. he is far from being the first in this regard, and ender is far from being the first, that is, in this. and it turns out that if we speak from the point view here is such a historical gap. uh, everything is hard with the experience of state building - this is just the same experience of existence on the border of the state, the experience of existence, or outside of each other state. when a, apart from the raids of other e, there are no things, that is, pure experience is obtained. uh, the same on the running economy. if we say so already, when they ran,

divided, divided, ran, ran away again, this is an unstable situation. this is just such a nomadic situation, which , uh, is very bad for the prospect. statehood in ukraine, it’s interesting that we had the same thing could be. here i remember the most amazing thing, that here again a person exists. why could it be? after all, we can actually still be, if suddenly all the time, if the decision was made in the nineties ? excuse me, our politicians were offended by pozdnyak and others. what to do in the open, what is the russian man's suitcase russia's train station what? kolleg sergeevich what to pay attention to? here we see that there is nothing new, through bandera, a modern manifestation. only we forget, yes, make the political system strong. that is, what we are doing is the adoption of the constitution now, in the fall, the parliament begins to work. we have a huge number of bills that are sent to continue the constitution, civil society , all the belarusian assembly, political parties. i'm saying this is all a very huge layer

of the work of the whole country is directed. it is one to strengthen the political system of the country to develop the political system of the country. i'm not talking about ideological work, historical work. this is what we are discussing everyday. if we do this, you are right, we will not do this, we will do the same , we will not be lazy, we will not sleep. nothing now listen and watch. well , what can i do? what should i do in order not to work like in ukraine in the first place at my workplace . this is the first second to tell the truth. we must listen to the truth and, most importantly, educate children, i just always listen to the president. from everyone, he always tries to me, so that a person lives an ordinary human life, on the one hand he lives rejoiced brought up children at his workplace worked loved, in the end, love your country love your children, love your family, work and never in your life. don't take money out of borders grants here. if we take

politics, grant got out of politics in prison, that is, we should not have an external factor, in general, by the age of 24. we have elections in the twenty-fourth year. let's tell the truth, 24 is a single day of voting on the new constitution of all deputies. we are analyzing all levels, what should be done? my first opinion is no external factor observers who imposed sanctions, there should not be any papers from the recognition of non-recognition of the elections. let in your office immediately and the second moment, which should be the work in the field of each official. that's all for me. that's what the president says work to be strong, and we will not stand. thank you, i would add everything absolutely correctly alexey sergeevich says that the political system is of great importance and is important, but any political system consists of people, so first of all, of course, we must bring up. eh, patriots to all of ours. yes, our children should be proud of the history of their country, those that our ancestors overtook, what

is now done by our modern ones, belarus and this process. it should be continuous from the family kindergarten schools universities and so on are still the most important aspects of preserving historical memory. we must keep ours. so, is it history to be proud of it, or is it just the same year of historical memory that is now taking place in our country that focuses our attention on this. but it is not means the year is over. this process must stop. no, it must continue and further and we must transmit this objective historical memory of ours to our younger generations, and then on the condition that our political system will be created and it has already been actually created. yes, we will improve it, then we will be guaranteed against the shocks that we see, unfortunately, in many countries of the world from the controlled chaos that is present there, if we talk about the belarusian well, here is an undoubted advantage about the fulcrum about strength, this is an industry that was created after the second world war, and which is preserved by love through reform and

which is now becoming a locomotive, because there is nowhere without good, that is, sanctions pressure opened up huge import substitution markets for belarus in the first queue in russia means that in fact in front of a huge number of belarusians. it is worth the opportunity to make a career in the workplace about what oleg sergeevich said when you can earn, a, and make good money in the industry, producing something, creating something to do, especially since the demand for this will be a cycle has already begun and some first results will already be a. the level, that is, in this regard, if we look at the belarusian tradition, yes , after all, i somehow ah, flipped through the customs tales of the fifteenth-sixteenth century. so, about 140 types of goods were supplied from our territory to russia at that time moscow. moreover, deep types of processing, that is, belarus initially specialized in the fact that for something he knows how to do something he knows how to do something he knows how to

create. and this is the talent. and this is the ability. as a matter of fact, to develop a double-sided one, to strengthen it and build on it, in general, further. well, again, convert this into understanding. that is, we very rarely talk about what makes belarus different. yes, that is, here, in principle, the basis of belarusian values. it was russian industry today. so, whatever one may say, but in a broader sense, it is the ability to do something, the ability to create something the ability to produce something and, as a rule, it is necessary and good thank you. i think that the most important thing is for each of us, each citizen of the republic of belarus, to hear the concern that is expressed at almost every meeting. uh, the president of our country on the need not to relax. to work for everyone. to perform the function, uh, which he is called upon to perform . students attend classes to study well for

schoolchildren. this applies to the teacher. it means to improve the quality of the preparation of the youth for patriotic education. but, for those who creates material values, first of all, of course, not to give up the positions that we won in a very difficult year, even 2020, we turned out to be the best in 2021 in terms of growth.