he got a dilapidated house with the remains of a dirt roof with shining window openings with skewed walls. there was not a single museum object for this action . alexei mikhailovich went to moscow to leningrad and a very large museum shared their e, museum objects and alexei mikhailovich accumulated huge basic collections of our museum , which are now mostly shown in our both expositions. well , it's time to see the museum with your own eyes, it turns out that everything here is like in a palace, only in miniature, a fireplace of a suite of rooms, and here the commander's office no frills strictness and conciseness so, and that in a letter oh yes, alexander vasilyevich received news of the birth of his first grandson. and this is the interior of the

lady's living room of the xviii century. what luxurious items around is no wonder the golden age of catherine the great next to the historical house is a modern building, stylized as a medieval castle, which houses an exposition dedicated to the families of the centenary of kobrin, let's take a look at the museum staff, sometimes our collection is called a small armory chamber. indeed. this is so, and experts who know a lot. uh, in the museum business. the high quality of our collection is always noted, among which there are a lot of genuine rockets and some things are presented in a single copy. this museum. you can also call the brand of the city safely. include it in your travel plan, you won't regret where we go next. believe it or not, the next attraction is also associated with the famous commander. not kobrin, but suvorov city what do you say. you

locals also joke like that. these guys are here for a reason. i think that the word calculation is more pragmatic. this is straight, extreme degree, prudence does not frighten them, nor a huge number of cameras are simple questions. i remember such an animal, it is so smooth, long and big. some kind of carrot was a sequence of thoughts and conclusions with you. good question, because each of them came to win the intellectual duel. i am very well versed in this

matter and can give an accurate answer. we have in the chest an example of what collects people who are fond of philocarty, which is an intellectually entertaining show in the chest. i know there is a huge amount of competition on the belarus 24 tv channel now in the world of sports. however, among all this diversity, one should distinguish between pop and really, exhausting women's football lately. it has become so popular that it is no longer distinguished from men under 35 in one polo - this is still a game age. uh, most when people play the best players in the world of europe it is players 35 middle age who do not have time for a european start in ours. neighbors, that is, according to the organization, everything is going very well and clearly. this is what the expected biathlon season will be like, we will find

out in early autumn at the ibu congress in salzburg, an overview of the main sports news, see the arena for belarus 24 program . like a trappet at a gentle carriage, the drilyas are upstairs at their passerby step at the same time as the lake. yes , we follow her history of meat images, decide one and the magic ritual idea of ​​\u200b\u200bseeing off mermaids about them even this leaves a rich supply of such a mermaid and something demonic and unreachable for a person. the mermaid got caught by the tanks, let's give it to the second tradition. the new one is fine. i will look at the project for the fifth minute on

our tv channel. the peter and paul church is one of the most ancient temples of kobrin. there is no information about the time of the church's emergence, but it is quite possible that the shrine arose in the city at the time of its foundation, this temple is a monument of wooden architecture. it is interesting that the shrine used to be in a completely different place in city ​​center close to home. suvorov , the chief commander visited him almost every day and even trodden a path to him through the neighboring garden. alexander vasilyevich was a zealous christian, he sang in a thick bass voice in the church choir, read the psalter and even climbed the bell tower when it was necessary to

call at the beginning of the 20th century on the site of the peter and paul church. they decided to build something more impressive - a large pompous stone temple, looking at which everyone was the initiator of the construction, emperor nicholas ii himself initiated the construction. so a small they decided to move the wooden church , put it on logs and rolled it to the cemetery area. in the courtyard of the church, on the family grave of alexander mickiewicz , a masterfully executed monument in the form of a grieving angel has been preserved. there are plenty of places of worship in kobrin. majestic temples of various confessions of the 17th-19th centuries stand literally sideways in the city. here is the church of the assumption of the virgin mary built in the forties of the xix century. and this is one of the largest synagogues in belarus

, a perfect example of religious tolerance. right at the crossroads pervomaiskaya and kirov, the scarecrow square begins, where we will definitely make a stop. at the foot of the pedestal, on which stands the figure of a mournfully bowed warrior, the mass grave of 174 dead liberators, kobrin, gravestones were installed for major general viktor pavlovich puganov and hero of the soviet union, pilot senior lieutenant arseniy ivanovich morozov , the bright sun shone, when suddenly even the sky began to cry with rain the memory is in us and does not let us forget that it is important to appreciate and cherish. where are we next to where you can see more than 300

freely roaming black african ostriches from kobrin, not so far, only 20 km. we are on the spot. if we're lucky, we might see the mating dances of the males at this time of the year. they give out such a wonderful way to convey the fullness of the partner's feelings and thereby impress. please note that the males have a martial color around the beak and on the paws, warning that it is better not to come close to them. still any ostrich. here is the main member of a large family. yes, and a lot of wives, the ostrich family e has from two to five females. this is due precisely to the continuation of the genus with the breeding of babies, because under natural living conditions, the ostrich is not able to lay the required number of eggs in the nest in a short period of time, climb into the aviary and take a

selfie with the ostrich, but it’s scary. here it is probably the most important. the male is very beautiful . very natural. this bird has practically no competitors to hit the paw of an ostrich is afraid, even a lion will take a picture, perhaps with an egg, each of the eggs weighs an average of one and a half kilograms shell thickness - 2-3 mm. one such testicle holds from 25 to 27 chickens, our entire creative group can be fed with the largest egg, as i was told cheerfully two kilograms of 102 g. yes, in kobrin in the kobrin district there is definitely something to see and what to try, unlike chicken omelet eggs, ostrich are very light and very nutritious. according to one american

writer, and i agree with him, every city, like a person, has gender and biological age, which has nothing to do with to calendar years. rome this woman, london teenager is a street child. paris is a slightly older man, 20, in love with a lady who is somewhat older than him. well, kobrin it seems to me that the city has a feminine essence. try to describe polite, laconic, but with an inner core of your own vision of the world with your view of people's situations and for some reason with sad, slightly wary eyes. it is quite possible that this image did not arise by chance, unlike other ancient cities. belarus in kobrin there were many beautiful ladies who had great influence on historical processes olga romanovna princess. kobrinskiy uliana anna feodora anna and gelonka. yes, one queen of bonn, what is it worth? so come and

discover your own, kobrin a glorified the lake's blue tire to the sky early, which corrected the races of mlesse. ponajak,

quarrels take off to wash the creatures, goodbye, they are removed. the skies have sketched out the latitudes of the lakes. behind the fabric grin under the sun. you look, he himself and nick are not over, but that gold sandy beer would drink from their endless outline of a small belly, all the more, i just want to stress, so that the thieves of the pestilence do not know, and the lakes of the calm never be forgotten, loves the heart. hello welcome

everyone. who is watching us now, of course, one of the main participants in today's program, died today. mikhail gorbachev and it so happened that this year he passed away . well, i’ll call it bialowieza’s opponents, kravchuk shushkevich, but, probably, in the current historical context, both gorbachev and shushkevich. and kravchuk, they do not look like opponents. they look like the people who hmm were responsible for the causes whose consequences are now reaping russia belarus ukraine it is clear that let's say this in christian terms, but about a dead person is either good or nothing, but in this case we are not talking about an ordinary person. this historical personality is a person whose decisions influenced the fate of millions of people, and

therefore i would like to ask this main question, probably today, and saying mikhail gorbachev should we remember first of all vyacheslavovich, from my point of view , unambiguously, what is connected with gorbachev? unfortunately, such an identical event with a negative connotation is a collapse or our great common country of the soviet union , whatever one may say, the person who was in power in such a huge country was not able to ensure its successful further development. and that policy of restructuring is not thought out. it actually turned into chaos and the collapse of the country or it was incredulity, on the contrary, too high gullibility, indecision in itself. gorbachev never understood what he controlled, that is, according to the degree of complexity. he didn't understand. how difficult was the system the soviet union did not want to understand this, let's just say, at the same time, i was absolutely convinced that, uh, western values, how they are sold, how they are in the window. they

are such, in fact, well , we know very well that this is quite, perhaps. in which he could take a word when the first thing that comes to mind with gorbachev is just a photograph. uh, where fidel castro is looking at him fidel castro already knows that gorbachev sanctioned the virtual elimination of fidel. castro is looking at him. in general, one absolutely expressive photograph is very famous. well, gorbachev, in fact, role confident speaks about democratic values. that is, this is my first association that pops up with this, that one can even note such a moment. eh, they probably don't talk about him, but it should be said that it was the decision of the politburo to nominate gorbachev to the post of general secretary. what did they come from. it seems to me that they proceeded from the fact that he is the youngest among

the polishers. it was a mistaken decision, the man was not prepared for leadership. such a huge superpower, that's why it's also one of the possible lessons. we now see not only in the post-soviet space, the tragedy in ukraine, but also in europe and all over the world. these are all the consequences, the actions of practically gorbachev, and for me gorbachev is an example of how important the personality factor is in history, that is, how important it is, despite the huge number of reasons that we all know about the collapse of the ussr, the internal external hybrid war that the ussr waged for many years . still, the factor of the first general secretary. he played his part. i am convinced that if in his place there would be someone else, the story would have gone in a different direction, not necessarily in a good way, it would certainly have been a different alexei sergeevich at that time, after all, in fact, gorbachev is also such a collective image of those who were in power in the soviet union at that moment, isn’t it, yes, but there were still people, i am convinced

that i still agree with my colleague that he did not have an understanding of what he was in charge of, that this sphere was a power that was constantly in tough opposition to the west. and i think he is now i think the last interviews, i watched him a lot. of course, i couldn’t admit some of my mistakes and completely say that i was to blame for this or the elevator, but i saw, at least in many interviews , it was felt that he understood what it all came to, and he saw and now, probably, a good thing is that russia has risen to its feet. i think that he managed to see that russia got on its feet. i think it owed him, as it seems to me, well, somehow the mood we touched on this topic before the program began. there is in this, however, some kind of metaphysics that all these people, whom we listed kravchuk and shishkevich and gorbachev, they turned out to be long-lived, and i don’t know if this is a reward, or kara is what they saw as a result of the decisions that were

made then many years ago. well, uh, if there is anything to add to this, well, i would like to say that, of course, with the death of gorbachev , the era of the soviet union is leaving, and now we are actually already noting that we will still feel the consequences of this era for a very long time, but at least for the 21st century this is unequivocal. well, of course, you can’t here, uh, exaggerate both epochs and the roman empire and other empires, but we live nonetheless. today we are building our e, sovereign independent state today and we remember the difficulties we faced when we started to create an independent belarusian state on the ruins of the soviet union when there was practically nothing. we had only our people,

who was our leader and that's the political will of our leader. this is another lesson. and i agree. with oleg sergeevich, it’s impossible to overestimate the role of the individual in history, but nevertheless here at this historical stage we see two antipodes. a man who actually stood at the origins of the collapse of a superpower and a man who created a sovereign state in 30 years. i think another lesson quite important gorbachev showed how important ideology is for the state, because once the ideology was broken, it was necessary to question it, it was necessary to abandon it, and it turned out that the soviet union had too few reasons to remain in its former state. that is, he just crumbled informally ideology, how important oddness is. we are constantly talking about this, and the president

demands that we do not have a formal job. there, the number of events and window dressing that we are doing something there in a patriotic way, then turned. yes, i remember i was very young in those years, but i remember very well that our komsomol organizer. every month he gave a report on the work done at the school where i studied; it was great. from work on papers, but in reality we saw what was happening. we are the generation of forty. i take him to myself . this is the generation that grew up like since on the ruins without ideological installations, which we just rummaged, we saw this lie, the commissar tells that everything is working. everything is fine. everyone feels great, but in reality, nothing and the same capsor on weekends. i'll tell the truth in the basement playing these films and taking money from us there , uh. here, so that i would like to note such a moment that our example of the belarusian prime minister, just the same, says that, in principle, the soviet union had a

future. we have not canceled those values, the most useful things that were in soviet society, we preserved and developed them further, that is, our example shows that a lot depends on who is at the helm of the state. yes, it means that the ruling elite is what it is set up for and such a future could be for its soviet union if it were to be said in one of the examples that are drawn from the twentieth year. and with all the events in the post-soviet space, it ’s so scary when we start building, that we decide to build something new, having decided to destroy to the ground everything that we did before, here we are we saw that this path leads nowhere. that is, before you even start building, millions of people will die, how many beggars there were then and what they had to go through just to start building, and what kind of people were the most important thing to destroy everything, and then there will be some new great country and let's tell the truth . we are constantly being told this idea and now struggling, for example, with our history,

what they want to convince us about, what we have in our time for 100 years. we didn't have anything good , 3 days. belarusian people's republic everything is proud. nothing more. sergei tried to say one more lesson about the role of the party. yes , in principle, it is also in the collapse in that deplorable outcome, but of our super power. here we are now and actively began to engage in party building and the formation of a real civil society. uh, so we must also learn a lesson, learn this lesson, when in fact the party, probably, uh, if not from above rotted and uh, there were no leaders from that party of the huge party there were 16-18 million communists. that is why it is also necessary that this thought be very correct. after all, thoughts are the middle point just the day before, in the palace of independence, the president held a meeting and they were talking about how this

should be done, the transformation in order for them to strengthen the state, they rocked it, and discussed bills that relate to the development of civil society. development of the party system. at some point, just the presidents said that, probably, now is not the right time to engage in this process, but they promised once they promised, they must keep their word, and this is one of the key thoughts. which sounded it seems to me that it just coincides with what you were talking about, sergei anatolyevich, the party is power, and it attracts both idealists and political and adventurers, so approach this issue. it is necessary to consider, stimulating the activities of the parties that are useful to the state and building a rigid barrier to those of them who will be aimed at wrecking, these are the adventurers who were they immediately abandoned the party. they immediately voted for the rejection of the corresponding uh chapter of the article in the constitution of the soviet union, and the guiding the role of the party. that is, i just wanted

to bring to this idea that party building really needs to be done very carefully and carefully, it should come from life and see who appears at the top of this or that party. what are the attitudes, value attitudes, and political ones? do these people stand for sovereignty? the state is guided by the line of state ideology, that is, the people usually support the voters or well, here we see how the people really are what is commonly called the people of the electorate. e people. here they are they observe, they see that i like to influence them, they can’t influence much in ukraine, it was like that in the united states, there can be such a body. how vns? yes, everyone says that the people's assembly to such an examination. i could carry out, firstly, of course, the legislation should work, it was in the soviet union, but it was not observed, so to speak, but those structures that were supposed to exercise supervision. they have eliminated themselves a very good topic. you

understand, so let's take the ussr here. today we present parallels and today's. uh, white belarus here. uh, the first thing the president was talking about yesterday was parties, which are public organizations. they should not contradict their activities with the constitution of the country and the course that the country has chosen, remember the ussr how many political parties of public organizations did it turn out there? they opposed not just the constitution of the ussr, which made radical proposals and legally acted on the territory of the soviet union, this, by the way, is not democracy. this is the collapse of the country the second moment. what did the president say about the reform the political system should not lead to the destruction of the political foundation that today is this is again an example of the ussr, we are again returning to the past. when we already talked about this, we came to a radical political form. everything collapsed to destroy easier than to create something and the third moment. still. why do you need to do this? this is again the lesson of the ussr one-party system. with all its

benefits. it also has minuses and minuses - this is the loss of feedback from the society to the president. yesterday i also said that we must, on the one hand, be monolithic and not in any case, do not shake, because these are beautiful words democracy of different opinions. it is very easy to transform into different groupings. inside the country. we see this in other countries, including. parties that turn into a rumor of the oligarchs, which turns into a rumor of certain political centers and work not for the people, but only for themselves . this is all the belarusian people's assembly, which will generalize all this will become a mechanism, really feedback with people, where you can criticize, where you can discuss and propose, and most importantly , do it, because in my opinion a political party is a structure that not only

proposes, not only speaks about what needs to be done in its opinion and strengthens the country, but we are also making an important point, yes, and the party , in order to be functional and useful, it must stand firmly on its feet, but on the ground, and in detail on the earth, this means to be tied to a specific sector of the economy. after all, in fact, historically, if it is the queen from the very beginning, the party is an entity that brings together the interests of the industry, the interests of the electorate and the state. this is such an intermediary that maneuvers between three large subjects. it is extremely important, it is indispensable, because the task of the party is to explain why it is necessary to spend policy on this, this activity regarding the withdrawal in the distribution of resources. yes, that is, it is like a joint stock company of all citizens. so here it is accordingly, the party explains why this sector is a priority, or vice versa, it is not a priority, and in this case there is real interest. if you look at these problems of the

belarusian opposition, all the time it was all the post-soviet time, and absolutely zero attention to the economy is absolutely a misunderstanding of what it is? and when compiling that everything will be regulated by itself and will be e, it doesn’t work it doesn’t work it doesn’t work the system doesn’t work like that. so , when the party is tied to rea. interests, she stands firmly on the ground. she understand, what sector, what brings. what an embarrassment. e into the economy, then there is something to talk about, then a very understandable and meaningful political process arises. there is something to talk about. one of the most resonant moments at the meeting was resonant, especially in those opposition media that followed the president's speech. let's listen to him, you know, more and more i come to what i moved away from, uh, at the time of the adoption of the constitution well, maybe a new generation will come to this, you will come representatives of public parties. uh, i studied the party building system and

election of elected bodies. e all over the world. uh, we didn't risk in vain to invite people to elect authorities, especially the president at the entire belarusian people's assembly. we are wasting the presidential election - it will rock the situation. look at politics and party activities in china, and so on, this is also professional work, that we have more than seven million. how many voters do we have there? are they so immersed in all these processes in order to consciously decide somewhere, after all, this is a professional, and that's all the means of society are professional political would be, uh, our belarusian people's assembly. they elected a president, that today we are electing and sitimping at the entire chinese people's assembly in the cis, he, that e has no

authority yes, more than me and putin put together, the absolutely correct statement of our head of state regarding what people should know means, e those people whom they elect, yes, it means to understand what it means to make a responsible choice with our history, if we turn to it for the slavic peoples, in principle, it was typical when it means, uh, people put forward ahead of those whom they know from the point of view of sociology, the maximum option, when it means 4,000 people choose someone from their environment. and further. this is a chain. it can continue, so, uh, or you walk yes , the leadership of the state does not seem to be, uh, what is valuable in our uh, belarusian model of social development. this is what we seek to learn from our history. the same mechanism. e. this means the functioning of the entire belarusian people's assembly. after all, its roots go back to ancient times. this is the richest historical experience of our ancestors, which we use today. yes, i understand that you, like

a real politician, have chuiko, you know what will happen later, but you need to formulate an idea for yourself so that we, as it were, clearly follow this line, and opponents say that yes, about the entire belarusian folk meeting. everyone understood that this is really something from the people, but how to take away the right to vote, so that the elect can choose, just look at the most important thing. that's when this opposition is radical, especially aroused by the president's statement that the electoral system for presidential elections may not be the same as it used to be, this is not an experience for democracy. it 's not a freedom experience because they never win. not in such elections, not in such elections, not in such elections, because we saw this very well in 1920, when the president confidently defeated the question of another concern for seeing whether belarus is going. way, and i took the words of the president. that's how how the politics of the president is constantly says that we should not blindly copy any country, and even in the

electoral legislation. we have not gone down the road now. uh, other countries, we take something good, but we go our own way, for example, to the constitution. we did not accept copy it in the west, copy it in russia, copy it somewhere else. why do we have our own history, our traditions, our foundations for 30 years, and we wrote the constitution from the people from the earth. the president speaks on the presidential election. but is the presidential election in the navy less democratic than direct elections. and why the example is just throwing someone caught the president knows that in many other countries, including europe yes, if directly or strikes, but in the united states direct but perhaps in the european union, here is the one that gives us an example, perhaps such insanity as we have that the person woke up simply. no education, no career, and he says i want to be president. yes, no, this is very important , the german chancellor, just the other day,

declares that the european union needs to prepare for the fact that it will have 30 or even 36 member countries . in that case, it would be more convenient make key decisions unanimously. yes, yes, as it is now, but by a majority vote, so that individual countries could not impose their veto, there was absolutely no solution, because they have already stopped hiding that there is no democracy in europe, there are no direct elections either. or do you choose? where did macron come from, where did kachinsky come from? show me at least one housewife there or this same homeless person from the street, how we have this electoral law that needs to be changed for the president of the presidential election. it is unacceptable for a person to wake up and say. i want to be president. this is not in any country. there is no peace, but it pushes us. i was not a deputy, i wasn’t a minister, i wasn’t a governor, i didn’t go through the economy, and i want to be president, and those countries that don’t have this are pushing us, close to none. they

generally have an idiotic system. they have a manager behind him, there are elites who decide everything, and he tells beautiful pr videos, and we see what this leads to in europe. political organization, which in fact . look at the coal, another station in germany was launched, they say, it’s fine, it’s okay, they applaud the ecology, we’ll survive normally. the main thing for putin will get worse. and what will happen next with manure will drown applaud everything, everything will be the whole of europe in smoke, and says putin this is bad. he died, no longer, not dead. oh well, he 'll be patient with ukraine a little more . that's what politics is and that's what the president is talking about, right? yes, if we talk about democracy, how it is actually based on the presumption one of the presumptions that an incompetent majority can elect

a competent majority, but we do not elect a doctor who will perform an operation on our russians by voting. i would recall here the history of the christian church, which began with the choice of the pope in a direct democratic election. damas dads. it didn't end massacre when you cut out the pool of rome and then the principle of direct elections. there it was the same principle to ride, and when a competent minority of bishops chose from their midst those with experience in possessing a captain. uh, the first epic, yes. that is, what was then implemented in the united christian church. yes, at that time it was somewhere in the third-fourth century of our era, that is, in this regard, in the configuration, there is just nothing wrong. this is a good thing. it is she who minimizes the costs on the one hand directly of their elections. and there are pre-direct elections. uh, such a direct election is impossible without the resource is large enough and if we look at western terminology.