and their own, as it were, state, everyone has already been oral, e, belarusians. uh, by the way, we already had uh, 58 states of the world are like that. well, you can say good achievement from all continents. we also had theaters from new states this year. uh, unfortunately not, but almost all the teams uh, new only there are uh a few theater teams that are not participating. for the first time, this is the theater of belarusian drama. e, ours, so to speak, e, the regular guests of his beloved , meets him well and, e, in our viewers, e, positive criticism. eh, they always have it something new and interesting. also teams from

russia but for the first time we will have nizhny novgorod for the first time. uh, smolensk at the festival for the first time there will be a team from chuvashia , uh. and, of course, we had greece at the festival, but this is also a new team and an interesting person. first this technical difficult. but, and secondly, i think that we will be able to satisfy our favorite viewers. how many guests annually gather festivals? well, the festival gathers in different ways, but it's somewhere around 1,500 people on average, these are

festival participants and guests, and the press, and many used to come to us from abroad specially watch the festival performances. i think this year, uh, i will also come and spectators from all over belarus to watch some performances, because, but we are trying to collect or invite those performances or uh, which are not available to the audience in direct communication, so uh about theatergoers interesting to see other theaters, other performances and other actors festivals have been centenarians for a quarter of a century, what is the secret of his success and such popularity it would not be very difficult to answer such a question for the simple reason that i, as it were. i am inside this, uh, but i think i can respond with

one word of love to the fact that we uh meet our friends and colleagues well. e theaters that they see a beautiful city. this is what they see as a wonderful relationship between the audience and us, the organizers of the festival. here is such well, friendly, uh atmosphere full of love and respect, that it is very difficult to refuse this, that's why there are so many theaters. e, with us, they try to come more than once, of course, we are happy to invite those who have been with us more than once, but sometimes you have to change and say, guys. well, you've already been there two or three times. let's make way for someone else. but it's very nice, what i'm saying, uh, the people

who come to us. eh, they leave here all with pleasure and satisfaction , but also with the desire to return to us again. i think it's all about our hospitality. our love is our uh, such an attitude. uh, human uh, creative uh, and creative to everyone present. thanks to the questions the program answered alexander kozak director of the belaya vezha international theater festival honored artist of belarus results and analysis of the main events of this week in the information and analytical program on the main air all the projects of our tv channel are on the website www.blarus24.by, as well as in social networks . i'm sorry to you. total good.

today our topic is history, as a subject, as

science and as politics, the studio is with you alena surova and kirill kazakov hello good evening. last week, belarus celebrated the day of knowledge, which turned out to be a nationwide no less big open lesson in the palace of independence held by the head of state, but for us, probably, in this format, this is a certain historical event and i must say that there were students schoolchildren cadets well, that is, students senior classes. yes, this is the lesson . it seems to me affecting, well, all segments of the population and age, given that it is still discussing. in general, as a matter of fact, with the events of the past week, we will begin, er,

our today's program. as you know, not everyone listened to this open lesson. here, right in the palace, someone was listening in assembly halls in schools. and if we heard the opinion of the guys who especially distinguished themselves during the lesson at the palace of independence the day before. they have already managed to explain their motives and actions to all the media, the opinion of the guys who listened, uh, the head of state from the tv screens at school. well, it probably hasn’t sounded yet. kirill, i know that you were one of the students who spent september 1 in this format. tell me, but before that, probably, all the first lessons were yes, well, in standard 45 minutes, and hmm every year. well, a new topic, well, plus or minus the same this time, 4 hours was not difficult, but every year the same lessons , the same teachers, this year we didn’t remember the guys very much,

because the president, but started the training year from history lesson. so i strengthened my knowledge, if i also systematized them and i wanted to return to the origins to the beginning. i would like to know more about my country in general, well. what does it give us and what are our priorities in this area? well, based on what a say our opponents. and in principle, it sounds on the internet. they say that young people were bored, barely hatched to the end. this lesson was difficult to explain, they were not ready to accept everything hung on their phones. well, with proud envy , with kind envy, i envied the guys who were present at the palace of independence. so i would very much like alexander grigoryevich to visit my school. this is the largest school in the moscow region. middle school number nine. here is my favorite school. i am very grateful to her, kirill itself such a simple question. well, as they say, yes, let’s go, for example,

i go on an excursion with children with someone, i tell, i show something, my task, probably, is not to tell everything about this event, monuments or what happened here. and probably about the fact that he came. now i use all mass communication, climbed up there in the same google read. and what plants are walking no, what is the brest peace and what is the riga peace what is left? well , for example, i returned home, yes, i turned on the computer in the shower, christmas trees. i didn’t understand this, yes, as i look, you know, it seems to me that if we come with the guys some kind of historical place, so that a person would let us feel this place, so that we clean up the atmosphere. here is the brest fortress. we were it okay, i understand everything, what was left after this lesson president that, well, i wanted to know more here. and what topic you just wanted to read, but our achievements. but it was necessary to use our technologies that we are developing. so i am very proud that we have

pvp, we are developing, we are moving in this area. we have mechanical engineering. uh, because i really love the electric car. i would like some startup from belarus to shoot as well as tesla here. i want to be proud of my country. this is how the switch the question to the president, in principle, was built quite classic. at first, the questions began, what did you ask? answer, then showed the artifact showed. look later i went to the cards, then i gave a lecture myself. in principle, these parts consist of a regular lesson, not only history, any lesson guys, what were you asked? what is not understood. now i will tell you new ones. let's show it clearly. this was an example of a classic lesson. and how the president behaved, how teachers. well, before answering your questions. i would like to point out what it really is it is extraordinary when the leader of the country gives the first lesson the first historical lesson for

pupils and senior classes and students. and it is symbolic that this lesson took place on september 1, the day of knowledge, in the years of historical memory, in the context of the aggravation of the political situation on our borders. yes, and despite the huge employment of the head of state, he found time to conduct the first lesson and showed us a teacher of various levels a master class, as an accessible form, it is very emotionally very easy to tell the children the history of your country, make it proud. actually. this is a lot for us. so it's a charge. here, in principle, for the entire academic year. of course, i am not a teacher either. but it seems to me that i still do not agree with you that it was a classic form. igor tell me that before the start of this lecture, but in the palace of independence we discussed. yes , here's how to start. whether the president would go on patent, almost everyone was sure that he would not, but that he would start exactly, and precisely with these

characters. well, you could hardly guess? yes, i agree, i think alexander grigoryevich tested the audience at the very beginning a of the lecture in order to understand in general, as a teacher, who is who how he reacts to basic things, if the action of the children's audience in the first place was different to those theses that i spoke to the president, as the main lecturer and other adults, like lecturers additionally, maybe this stage was longer, shorter, different, but as for me, alexander grigorievich saw that the guys in the hall were different with different understanding of historical processes with different abilities and desires to study modern it is from belarus to draw conclusions and draw parallels. based on this, here is the initial part. well, this was in terms of volume, and after the main lecture, questions and answers appeared , i’ll still take it upon myself to boldly say that alexander grigorievich was originally, but hmm, he had a certain plan for the lecture alone, but during the lesson i had to, like most. it

seems to me that teachers adapt to the audience that he actually saw for the first time. i want to pay attention. on how the educational function of the lesson was subtly implemented. this is the most subtle moment in each lesson that requires great professional skill and speech and not about reading some kind of moralizing look here, that moment with vasily bykov's awards that had a great educational effect, because it made you think and uh, today it is present and today we are talking about some new technologies in the lessons, including history, there is a technology of critical thinking, in which there is a method of thin and thick questions, and the head of state very skillfully used this technique, because thin questions are those questions that require simple reproductive reproduction, what, where and when, and when questions require reflection

reasoning, the so-called thick questions. there were a lot of them in this lesson. they asked for tests. they demanded reasoning and evaluative argumentation, the psychological environment that i was, for example, on the air, of course. those who were inside, they felt this situation a little differently. well , still, even as on tv, how it felt, but in fact i don’t agree with opa garbage dumps, who said that children, but young people children students were bored. i did not see any dullness by non-verbal signs. there was interest, and there was attentiveness, because i agree with igor there really is an audience, uh, with different opinions. but even so, in everything the president was able to involve them and mind you, and not frightened by the uncomfortable questions that appeared, they were not provocative. they were uncomfortable. what does this say about the totalitarian regime, the children were not afraid, there was no fear. i did not read. uh,

fear on their faces. it was interest. it was it some even hope on the other side. after all, there were those schoolchildren in the palace of independence and in the assembly halls, which well , by nature, it is everywhere and always. interesting to sit, right? they are not because the lecture is given by lukashenka or some other teacher. it's just that you can't sit still and it's hard to focus. and so lukashenka says, i won’t take you, i won’t undertake to quote you verbatim, they force you to listen. although in general. sometimes you need to take and make everything listen to the school. yes, if everyone is given a choice of credit in the lesson, do not go at the lesson, i have big doubts that one hundred percent will come to school igor question as a journalist. this is, uh, such a journalistic cliché, but it was drawn out anyway. here in this one. uh, this event is a policy statement for adults. this is for adults. it is clear that i am now talking about this as a journalistic question. yes, that is a program statement. it is clear that the guys listened to the story, listened to the facts, perhaps they

knew, about which they read, perhaps not. but they were a policy statement, but it was a very important moment, uh, and at least the head of state. in general, i explained the connection and parallels, but it would be good for schoolchildren. the students independently thought about and compared historical facts with those events that are taking place in modern times. but because the policy statement concerned what is happening now, but in general, the logic of the head of state led to the fact that what is happening now is a logical conclusion from what happened earlier, so this stage is an independent independent conclusion and matching guys. have to do the howls themselves because the homework was not done. this is a different question here. it seems to me to ask already and other adult teachers to explain. and what was meant and somewhere even to make you think the most, probably, it is important that the story. she absorbed all the questions that were considered in the lesson of economics and

politics social issues of culture culture of journalists, which those issues that were considered - this is history and uh, the president is like uh in the first education history and mogilev said the state is the university of one of our leading universities with a first-class education, he showed how to teach, that is, she said that later, not with the guys at all, she said that his lesson turned out to be such a belarusian. but do you agree that there were such notes of socialist socialist? yes, this one was, uh, very interesting. uh, to listen when uh the president has clearly laid out this issue related to nationalism and nazism and further. look here for real. i am from the national academy of sciences of belarus we have a national librarian and many points that are used. this is the word the national president gave very clear answers. and the fact that about belarusians is about

a clear state lesson about the state lesson of the republic of belarus so that the national academy of sciences does not turn into a nationalist one is a joke, but the point is i think you are at the national academy today , uh, on september 1, we were carefully listening to the institute of history at the academy sciences in the big hall on the day of knowledge, the day when the institute training of scientific personnel. uh, the national academy of sciences became the university of the national academy of sciences of russia, and here are 110 undergraduates, including from china, we pay special attention to this, they sat and listened and did not know very carefully what you were discussing among themselves. this is also a definite value. here is this lesson, history. i also have a note in the margins, but about those who, probably, are closely following our agenda and the speeches of the head of state. for them, maybe not. well

there are so many new things in this lesson, especially about current events for young people, for children for teenagers who are not so immersed in the agenda, they know very well. a lot on the top or or from the stories of parents or more, er, older comrades, but it seems to me that there were many discoveries of the question, for sure, after all, we read very different sources of information kirill where you draw knowledge about what is happening. on the internet, the instagram internet channel or these are really classic sites. a-a youtube to all social networks youtube to instagram telegram as far as we are well, young people, we and all the rest of us, well, in your case, we look on the internet are signed. no, i don't know what's good. but the classic hmm cool watch. for example, in my school childhood there was a

class hour. we could discuss some news. someone was funny to someone. it was not interesting, but still it was a kind of information delivery. here is something you have. ah, of course we have cool hours. we get together and discuss, listen to the opinions of different guys, that is, of course, there is such a thing. well there is more the republican project is the school of an active citizen, which, among other things, discusses socio-political issues. a. tell me, the school of an active citizen is a very well-known project even for journalists. we say yes, but if in the opposite direction. see what schoolchildren take out from there. here. tell me from the point of view of the teacher and from the point of view of the student himself. yes, you heard it, you left and slammed it. uh, briefcase and come home. and you basically don't. nothing remains something. well, we are discussing, of course, this, well, you need to take all points of view and highlight your personal one. so i think, well, you need to listen to me never parents influence parents talking of course, parents are

teachers friends with everyone, a u from the teacher's point of view, how does the school of an active citizen help to communicate with children. after all, he said it right. there are people who have children, yes, schoolchildren, who, well, it's not interesting, in principle, it's not interesting and will never be interesting. well actually. i think it's not very right, because any person. he is somewhat interested in the question of how we are a person, that is, a small one. mm, more people to convey information in our school, for example, to the school of an active citizen. we invite you to know, even ministers are invited and when high school students sit and communicate in such a place. you know , absolutely not whimsical environments. they are allowed to ask all the questions they want to hear. yes, they break the pattern. you know such a strict official, but i'll probably express my point of view. to me it seems that after all, this very popular thesis that they talked with the minister on a short footing that

you can go take a picture with the president. i don’t mind honestly, but it seems to me that it’s still a kind of feeling. so-and-so is the correct word. this is how it should exist, because when a boy breaks down and runs to the president. well, i understand that, probably, this is correct, but on the other hand. i'm like a schoolboy. i would be ready for this moment. for me it would be a kind of sacred action. here is my personal opinion. well maybe i wrong, but no one says that for a student this is not a sacred action. and that he wasn't prepared for it. maybe he mustered up the courage to run, but he still has the opportunity. here's the opportunity. i agree with you. this is definitely a plus for alexander grigory and absolutely. i agree, and he had a little doubt that he could then just do it then he decided. from the spot and just now, well, well done, some translated, but well done. yes, i'm sorry colleagues care. yes? here we go specifically this guy who

i went out to be photographed with the president, he had a meeting with the head of state, as with a historian, and perhaps, firstly, the opportunity to listen to a lot from the first mouth and ask questions. here's my next thought. and what was more important for him to take a photo with the president or learn something new, ask a question, gain some knowledge. and if it’s more important for him to take a photo, so that everyone says something cool to do. here the problem is in history, because the burning of the temple is also a story without questions, because emotions he had more on the fact of taking pictures than when he asked. but you know, you noticed that, well, they took such bright people from the sitting ones, and three or four bright people were singled out. so a young man who was different from the inscription of the young man who ran. engraved, and the young man who spoke of the gift is dressed. uh-huh yes, zakhar is dressed like that. here. you look how they divided these guys. and that means our respected comrades opponents. uh,

right there, just the enemy picked up clearly, the enemies picked up the agenda, and immediately determined who our and who is not ours, while zakhara, only on the basis of the fact that he speaks the belarusian language, made his own and, well, it turns out somehow strange that we share the mov principle alexander grigorievich immediately switched to the belarusian language, but in the same language he became talk to the young man. and kind of like questions with not you. why did our opponents make him their symbol and replicate the dialogues, oh, the headlines that the young man laid siege to the president in belarusian. yes, the question is a question, because for our opponents or enemies it is blatant a fact and mega-news for their adherents that someone in a conversation with alexander grigorievich, but allowed himself to say something

that, perhaps, they did not expect. what personally alexander grigorievich is more than normal, but in our media field there is such an aura that if something extraordinary happens, it means that it was not agreed upon according to plan. this is some kind of sabotage and so on. that is, if schoolchildren came to drive them, yes, a 100%. if you have a question, it means that they wrote to them, and it's great that later our colleagues are already there. e from various tv channels. with these or schoolchildren. we talked, quite normally, the schoolchildren told someone showed off. some people had their own thoughts. well, in general, these are not forbidden schoolchildren, and we did not pretend that they did not exist at all. but, to be honest, i have doubts that we would have acted this way earlier, therefore, for some reason, the twentieth year was taught to us in the same situation in the same situation . i would like to sharpen it. not at the moment when the president asked him about the soviet period and zakhar began to tell his point of view, and then added that however, i'm trying to figure out what is happening and because this dialogue

took place. uh, this dialogue took place at the beginning. i think that with this in mind, the president, among other things, built his further speech and focused on certain events during the period hmm, our soviet period of history , some kind of knowledge for everyone absolutely for children of different levels. but such a story. it seems to me that this lesson was quite verbose. we are talking about the fact that it was informative for schoolchildren, yes citable for journalists, but for historians it was, in principle, very little symbolic. who noticed that the first of september is the day the second world war began and the whole topic of the president, which was it was about peace, but about the fact that we will have to achieve peace, and sometimes win not necessarily weapons, but for historians. was

it a special message or not? you know, i rewatched it several times . here are many moments to communicate with with their colleagues. here is stanislav yuretsky, who answered his vision and opinion global and personal knowledge or learning. you can say through uh, a small homeland through a personality that, in principle, is correct. because history makes a personality. e xu studying the whole history. and it is very important for me that the president revealed all, uh, pages of history, what he always said, what draws attention to what he spoke about when he gathered historians. he said i have a history of belarusian statehood. here is a five-tonner, but also moments associated with

historical national forms belarusian statehood. he opened and failed. in addition to what happened at the referendum on the constitution, we have the fifteenth fifty-fourth article - this is the fifteenth great patriotic war, the heroism and trade of the great patriotic war and the second world war, and then article 54, where all the deep history is thousand years old. and if there is a deep, thousand-year history of belarus of the republic of belarus with greece, a sovereign independent state. we are not afraid of anything. we can look to the future, but the fact that september 1 is knowledge day and history lessons president. i think it. uh, i just couldn't help but pay attention to the events that took place more than 81 years ago. and uh, the events of the rome peace treaty, this approach to his map, when he clearly

showed the borders that remained, and what? today for us for belarus means september 17 , 1939, the day of national unity, which we just already, which in carts excuse me, i’m already talking in the language of users, was also discussed. we had some time when the economy beat politics. well, here's the word- it turned out that we always talked about the fact that we should earn more to sell more, and the story on this day, did it not lead to the fact that politics defeated the economy, and that, and politics needs to be thought in exactly the same way as about the economy, because somewhere thinking about the earnings of the country. we have missed the ideology of politics, that very twentieth year happened. that's right. e history. i am probably valentina vasilievna, many of my colleagues. i don’t know, petrovich will also agree that, uh, in the first place, uh, there should be history - this life teacher. we sometimes forget if we

already touch on national security or the concept of national security. such a word as national interests, unfortunately, we these national interests are our national interests and interests through the historical and cultural archaeological heritage through the significance of these historical events for the entire belarusian people. for our country. for some reason, uh, well, they put it on a different plan, based on the mentality. features are objective subjective, probably some reasons. they pulled the enemies to the fore. we were somehow here are the cons. and what our historical neighbors did was to tell their stories. well, somehow i didn’t want to, because, well, the relationship is now normal, as if everything starts normally. yes, and that's why we missed it, many here, in relation to just a second, i'll add. these are the questions related to the twenty-first year. riga world. we got off to a good start last year. here are my colleagues there in france

, vyacheslav viktorovich danilovich and we called onibny shny unfair riga the world, which is another polish occupation in 1920, vlad plastovsky's words, we open the book. i also cited this, uh, example. uh, polish occupation, belarus in 1920, people were not shy. although, uh, vatslastnos people lived in this context. we, too, are living in the context of the twentieth year of this century. we can be tougher. i don't know what will happen in 100 years. and what kind of relations we will develop with your neighbors, but it seems to me that it is ours that we are now as modern historians. journalists record what we say, perhaps, like lastovsky, we will leave what he will say to his oppositional colleagues. uh, they, too, when last year we discussed these issues related to the thirty-ninth year, almost no one said that it was wrong. something not needed. that's about history on that scale. so voluminous, so

whole. eh, they hardly speak in schools, and i also remember my recent recent school years. it seems to me that here is the history of the world history of belarus yes, absolutely two different subjects, but somehow according to my feelings world history was taught and perceived much more enthusiastically than the history of belarus. it seems to me that after what we saw last week, approaches, including teachers, should change the given trends for them. komarov years. she is the father of fedor, he said very well, it's very cool that dry teaching. history will not evoke love for the motherland. because here are dates and events about the meaning of the meaning of the loss of the world, there the patient is reading some kind of movement, something is happening, some sort of e political, including political processes, and the history of belarus agrees, salty, in my memory, a little longer, much longer than alena’s and it ’s dry there. uh, the line of narration and actually

everything, yes, if you allow me, uh, to say that i remembered, so, when i listened to the discussion, i remembered the words of the great historian klyuchevsky, who says that history is a strict lady, and she punishes very painfully for an unlearned lesson. and in fact , alexander grigorievich demonstrated this when he spoke about the beginning of the great patriotic war. yes talking about that the soviet leadership knew, were there really reports that the war was about to begin, even the dates of the conference were gone on june 21 in history lessons, they say belarus or not, because you understand, but it’s not a matter of learning some dates and it’s completely different when you are told with specific examples on specific events, including some conflicting possibilities. there is a cause and there is an effect. this is normal historical science. i'm telling you as a professional historian. well there's a story teaching history is based on the same principle, historicism. and on the fact that any

event has preconditions. reasons itself. the discovery of the consequences and its significance for the history of cyril, here is what the president told from different periods of any choose from the voiced you m-m, perhaps you did not know, and what you remember most of all. but i knew about the second world war, but that's how the president attracted me. well our audi well on the step of the hall that we listened very carefully and noticed for some data that, well we don't know or not google here in stories. i'll just add a little to alyona's question. what period in history do you like the most? relatively speaking, the princely knightly gentry revolutionary military modern, well, conditionally in history there is another periodization, as it were, this

thing is very abstract attractiveness. here, the president noticed the turov principality, we are going through it , but within a small framework. now, if only we were and were much more. and if we touched him a little more, that is, look, you correctly corrected me. i made two non-scientific periodizations for me, as an educator. moreover, history teachers from socio-political disciplines, that's not the point. here, again, our users periodization is popular. uh-huh, yes, and when they take and popularize like this, as we say knights, it means that these are exclusively hussars who hid. it should be presented beautifully to draw beautifully, release labels and draw on t-shirts, and everyone buys another one. it was such a very powerful moment, i added, yes, but the story can be god, yeah. he was very much remembered, personally, to me and this was the very moment when the president gave a specific example that young people

performed. here's a historian. that's what the facts say, and uh, it seems to me that a lot of people thought about it after. this, of course, is performed, but think what you are doing, that is, the question can be popularized rather than scientifically substantiated. you know school history courses, it is built on certain principles and schools. history is an academic subject, of course, not the rains are not identical hmm the science of history. this is simply an adapted presentation of those scientific knowledge that is available today for a certain age. schoolchildren , we wo n’t get away from the principle of science from the principle of historicism, but as for, uh, how to teach history today so that it, uh, likes it, firstly, as a subject and yes, and so that it touches the soul, if we today we are talking about the need to form a historical memory in students, which

means that history must be taught in such a way that it really touches the soul, and for this it is necessary to say emotionally. so the presentation of educational material and the use various sources of information. and what is important, you need to ask students questions not only what, where and when, but you need to ask questions why and why you think so so that he can argue his point of view for half an hour, and this is not quite a lesson. we succeeded, but let's go for a little change. and then we continue our conversation about history. kuzma ivanovich there is such a phrase, it is biting, but not very beloved, the story, of course, that history is a cemetery of wilted welts. here tell me please, we we really remember what was and is it necessary. here we say to our modern children that without a history without a past

there will be no future, but as hollywood screenwriters say, we can draw any future for you. we'll just draw any past. what should be the history in order to be understood and our future was really interesting. with us, i would say with a glove that from the truth in the world, all history is treated by the theater, as we will show it. here it is in the images and guilty in the images to be stanovichi in our belarus history, and it begins with daunina. is it my drowsiness, my own drowsiness, subordinating there from the hood with a hood separately and he kept us and the great fire speech, the commonwealth and the russian empire, and only in the twentieth century, we begin our sovereignty belarusian sovereignty with its silhouette in the writing of history. she is guilty of being framed and real documents. and so they set it up for the fullness of historical

traditions, that is, the secondary memory of what is transmitted from the generation of the generation of the eighth tooth. this will no longer be history, and it may be registered. i am for everything to reduce ukraine. and maybe for a century already in 2019, ukraine europe recorded it activated that i will not fight for historical memory, the european region. we are really ready to robin only her husband and to recognize that, adopted by the constitution, like a robe of a bone hulk, to be brushed off for historical memory. ah i ok traits laws. what were taken about the genocide of the belarusian people at the time of the great war of the children itself is embellished by history. and which one does she obey unconditionally? i'm full be saved. here in that historian to feed. here oleg needs to joke around, because at the same time you know the caliber of historical memory

, and it is diverse, it is collective and it individually french heals, what is the most important thing is the national memory of the national memory investors. there are so many things i can, as it were, in the place of this historical fall, really show and tell everything, because i’ll give it to you, and belarus is in this and it’s troubling hit the meter. here, in belarus, the maya has a warm historical memory and we are obliged to form it. these are the approaches to memory. i didn't form. as a memory, and it was solemn and, of course, a diplomatic issue. you know, in a diplomat, there is such a notion that international law is most often either higher or lower than national law. that is, you want to say that in this story, national history should be slightly higher than international ones, and rob. how to show

yourself such that all over the world, in general, national law is national interesting national histories begin to roll over. yes, i want to note that the concept of school history education is currently being developed and in the tenth -eleventh grades a new integrated course will be provided, which will be called the history of belarus in the context of world history, respectively, the emphasis will be on national history. cyril said. the previous part about what needs to be popularized, but returning to the events that took place before the twentieth year. well, basically, how do i it seems rather the period of the great patriotic war. maybe due to the fact that it is really closer to us and chronologically, and in each of our families, each of us has personal stories. yes, that's why we treat him so unconditionally. this is the most terrible page in our history, but it is, well, much more popular than our other historical periods.

our opponents, among other things, took advantage of this, because they raised to the shield that during the period of the grand duchy of the lithuanian empire. well, somewhere less somewhere more, well, it's clear that saving was far away our enemies made politics while we were engaged in savings comment. uh, you know, youth is that part of society that, historically, tends to be critical of the experience of previous generations with this and these. i think everyone will agree, uh, our conversations are so-called. yes, uh, well, on the one hand definitely. this is so and so. ah, the youth audience itself. it is very difficult, because unexpectedly it can lead itself creatively, it can lead itself. here is the evidence. uh, something big and meaningful an event that was initiated and hosted by our president. but the conversation was

very important. in my opinion, the main leitmotif of this conversation is about all its versatility. this is the ideology of our society and the place of the history of the ideology of our society, uh, the terms are dialogues, and it, of course, causes an ambiguous reaction, especially among young people, some perceive it as a relic of the past, but in fact it is the most important element. e to stabilize any society. let me wash the statue of our president. ideology - it is the immune system of society. and it really is. so. let's take an example, let's say. e western democracies, whoever came to power right-left centrists. yes, it changes. uh, taxation increases or vice versa. uh, another direction is some kind of foreign and domestic policy, but note that none of those who have come to power raises the question in relation to their predecessors, we will destroy it to the ground, and then why because it is present there? logia, which consists of three main

elements of western dialogue, is e liberalism, which implies ah, individual freedom. let's just say socialism which implies a redistribution of benefits through the mechanism of the state to avoid shocks and conservatism to maintain the foundations. and in my opinion, the president emphasized that our ideology must necessarily contain the preservation of the surviving, uh, which we have a small problem, because it happened historically. at first we stood on, let's say, so, and in this regard, the conservative, apparently, on one leg, let's say on the left. uh, great the experiment of the ussr ended with the country falling apart on their fragments. the ussr was formed by the republic of belarus, like other states, we perceived our historical heritage through the prism of the soviet heritage. i'll just finish my thought. a new generation of historians is gradually growing,

new data, and so on and so forth. we begin to understand that the belarusian history is much older, the shift of emphasis to the right side begins. and how right, says our dear host, this was taken advantage of by the opponents of the authorities, who tried monopolize the idea and absolutely tried to, uh, nurture these or those heroes who are. well, really, like in hollywood. they say we can grow this or that so , uh, president. eh, i think it's underlined. so, uh, what is our history, it is centuries-old, it is ancient. it includes different periods. middle ages new time, modern time and nothing should be forgotten, nothing should be deleted, because, well, these words, there really were some periods. well , a little pushed back, you don’t know anything, i can only say with the words of our dresses let's take vladimir korotnovich and wild watering. king stakh who does not remember a

minute, forgetting bypassing those condemned dreams to survive the echo, and our history is many-sided with our bright historical personalities, it was permeated with one leitmotif of one goal, which can be put at the head of our ideology. e. here, as yanka kupala wrote to famous acquaintances, and someone where to be called people, this is the main idea, we are belarusians. we are a sovereign nation. we are a sovereign state back. as the president said, there is a lot of controversy was the state form there was no education and there will be. and everyone should understand this, and belarus, first of all, is statehood. first of all, one should not succumb to those people who, for the sake of their personal interests, offer such things that lead to destruction, but in the modern geopolitical world. it is a mortal danger nonetheless. i would like to return to your agataniya, what he hates war is to be the central ears of our lives in our history, because and the food was the food of life to be tanya of the lives of our

belarusian people, and you look at two singularity is the first, and we are talking about warmth, we are talking about tragels, no one has so much passion. i to belarus 30% 3 million, and the other is a struggle, the most massive struggle was in the hours of another color war of the people. it's just their people. some were underground partisans and some helped the military pollon. i keratized the jews, because you embarrassed the holocaust only because i didn’t help, and in this daughter it seems to me that we also show little and little faults, and there’s no lesson at the lesson, for example, i would like to, this is i often taught more because her opponents seem to be the other way around. share the great member of the war, we give, or rather a rare vaga, although i would have the initials of the composition with you today is a historian. here are my colleagues, we are chopping, mustache for that kapets, the more memory the memory of the disappearance of the great

purified war and with this butt is buried as much as possible. e at the lesson of alexander grigorovich pershaver. shmat spoke about the division of the war and the paternal war about the preservation of historical memory, and uh, i’ll say at a time that he himself unfolded it that way. wow. i am kirov nekraina on this action all people's action folk chronicle of the great bureaucratic war. remember, everyone has already published two books. uh, more than 200 spamming people. which ones are passed on about their relatives? what were the partisan joys, army scientists were taken out of germany , passed the great quiet war. and this young generation, i am by no means trying to dispute the importance of studying the great patriotic war. these are terrible times. i'm just saying that our opponents take advantage of the fact that we pay more attention to one period than others. forget they. they pull out facts that are beneficial to them,

romanticize them and sell them to young people. naturally from recently to our central youtube great context in the history of the great patriotic war. we always forget one thing. it seems to me that we always say there are dead, there are people who ended up in a concentration camp, there are wounded, but we won, we forget this story. we are the winners that is why wars were known to us and one of the reasons why it is so important is important, because there is a lot and in the parliament on different things they always emphasize everything. uh, specialists are scientists who understand here is the meaning of the great victory. they say, we are the winners, and there has never been such a victory and the president said, look at the year 812. where did the first world war come from? how many countries participated, by the way, in 812 they shaved and the student is still a european pain. well, first of all french i hope they know, yes,

but forty-first year, well, forty-first twenty- second june 15 states. and so, when we start talking about it, when we show it, we get it, and in response there are more people. there are institutions of national memory anastasia is a little confused. in the sense i'm trying to convey. yes, i understand, uh, that's what you are emphasizing and, in turn, i want to draw your attention to this. so, really, the opponents of the authorities, let's say, tried to focus attention more than once or twice, let's say. that's why you talk so much about this move, the front of the great patriotic war, and exactly the same as the leitmotifs they sound, among many of our western neighbors, that it would be time for so many years to pass. it's time to forget the parabolas already that conditional species, if you are interested in the period of species, then you are most likely. you listen to yourself there, uh, to the opponents of the authorities, for the

reason that and the topic here is a sweater and you are oppositioning it, because the state missed a little. yes, you can follow him. we talked about this in the first part. here i am , from my, as it were, small speech , i said this, yes, but i want to emphasize the attention again. why is there so much attention to this period of our recent history of the great patriotic war, you know, e. every nation has its own mentality. this the mentality is formed, including under the influence of certain historical events. eh, if you take the period of the great patriotic war. here. e, dear colleague. the historian called the figure more than 3 million, 3 million 70. uh, thousands of people, the united states lost dead and uh, trump died there 3070, probably thousands. and there was such a story in the forty-sixth year, our delegation, the belarusian one, when the un was formed, we were one of the founders, went to the united states of america, including, as it were, with people, and here at one of these meetings. they are

talking about what happened here. what horrors how many villages were burned. i am why i will say one such radical thing, why everything that was said about earlier and how it worked well on the topic of the great patriotic war from the point of view of ideology will not work today, because in 1950, the seventieth ninetieth year of the great patriotic war. and what happened then was a shock. now you turn on the tv. there the head was torn off, there is a war. they shoot there, then the child turned on, uh, he killed everyone himself, i i agree, so i'll finish i'll finish my thought for a second. what i'm saying is that if history is to be learned, let's learn from our most recent history of 2020. for the last 15 minutes, i have been trying to convey to you that one, uh, historical period is considered roughly

speaking, pro-government another historical period, our opponents have raised to the shield. why did this happen, because less attention was paid to one historical period and a conditional child who wants to google to find out about the same, vitavto. what source to what sources is he most likely to get, he will teach history and studies. either we take some species for ourselves, or we forbade everything we found ourselves in our history on our history prezen about what he said all the periods, and he very clearly laid out. wait until the president said. why wasn't it so many positions were prepared textbooks in school history textbooks are presented absolutely and in university and ancient history. and the principality of polotsk and the great principality, lithuanian and so on. so, with regard to the time that we devote to the

study of a particular topic or sections or periods in history, it is also quite balanced. although, for example, we have the entire sixth grade. this is the history of the middle ages, which it studies, for example, from the 10th century, even sorry, from the fifth century to the fifteenth year, the seventh grade - this is the story we get when the belarusian lands were part of the commonwealth until the 18th century. well, then the story begins, when the belarusian lands, after the divisions of the commonwealth speech, passed into composition of the russian empire number of hours. it hmm let's say it is quite balanced, but understandable. why do we devote more time to the history of the great patriotic war and a tragic and very heroic period in which we can educate schoolchildren today. but, uh, i’ll probably remember that back in january 2022, at a meeting that was dedicated to. uh, the historical policy of the belarusian state, the head

of state noted this kind of bias and said that we have topics that require more attention and outlined these are the content lines that you should pay attention to. in this list of content lines, both the polotsk and torov principalities included a teenager who begins to be interested in the period. i will call conditionally in the ninth-ninth grade, but he does not receive information from the state, because it has already passed in the sixth grade sight. today we have a concentric principle of constructing the content of school history education. we study history in the fourth grade at the level of stories about the history of the fifth to ninth grade from the most ancient from the beginning of the xxi century at the chronological event level tenth-eleventh grade from ancient times to our time at the problematic theoretical level. i don't agree with you. that's why because for the time uh? alexander grigoryevich lukashenko restored the minsk castle the castle of the radzivils in the stale

litsky castle was. uh, restored polotsk e, the cathedral, there are sapieha streets in minsk in principle. this is all another question, that politically we really have to protect our history from being from it they wove something like this. i would actually, i would actually forbid some radicals to write bad things about sniffing and euphrosyne polotsk, because now it turns out that whoever does not write about soviet belarus is, in fact, a western agent, this is also bad. sorry for the expression, i completely agree with you. this is a message, in principle, for the state ideology, what the president said, that we have a history. the history is centuries old. history, interesting is our history. we don't throw anything away. we all remember, don't try. we live, in principle, in a foreign information space. there is no need to look for some moments in this alien information space. we need our own cluster in this information space, what we are talking about so that our

neighbors do not appropriate what does not belong to them. well, i knew, i would like to return to your meals, because i am more sure to be kind to us foreign ministers, because there is no need to just look at our henchmen like that, we say to ourselves. let's take a look at the yak between belarus to speak and if we let's see, then guess another neighboring war. there are such 100% pies. these are voiced states of america in all ukraine, and she says, only others. so we called absolutely stratum and all the dates and all the falls just go for it, and here now there are opponents now only there in belarus, because here a small part of belarus is growing up, that it also shackled our traditions. i brick trends. well, the memory of the family memory, i then nowhere is the word itself. soviet politics, she is

an ideology, because well, how, how we teach, why, for example, we suddenly suddenly began to divide historical heroes into right and left. we shared them until the twentieth year, then something seemed to happen and now we are starting to share them, the president specifically said the speech of the commonwealth. yes, there really was a polishing of the belarusians, having moved to the russian empire, it stopped. let's consider the issue of the formation and history of the belarusian nation within the framework of different states. yes, and it is necessary to show objectively, based on the national state interests. uh, those who came to life they lived and served uh, and in the paradigm in which they were here, we, when we discussed the library of the union state for several months, then ago it was said about two e, field marshals, e of the end of the 18th century, associated with the events of 1.793-94 . two e people, e, who were born on

our e territory, lived on our territory and each served their own fatherland, and therefore the assessment should be objective and not be afraid, because if we do not say them petrovich, we will say for us a under a for ours more opponents financially more opportunities more people and yes, when alexander lukashenko says that history is always written to please politics. after all , he always says. they were written earlier, so now there is such a political situation around us and in the world, in general, that a period of history, in my opinion. i will say everything radically. well, there, as a thought, and not the territory of belarus as part of the commonwealth, but under occupation. i agree, and then everything that has been said below will add up to a puzzle, because one thing is in and another thing is forced , and then

will be with us, or maybe it will give about puzzles. and where to find i took a look, what was in the twentieth stage, he is in belarus and i will fly a tunic, thirty betrayal of my valuable water kept their betrayal. this is subordinate to the case of the fifteenth year. this is, in theory, a pawn of a light war, because then the german occupation regime is often established in belarus. well, and so on. kolya thirty yak can be said about this, because it’s often only belarus, it’s venestals, such a process, not processes - it turned out that we are the sea of ​​the belarusian state banking state, which was declared formed or not formed on the territory of our country, because the question is in energy is it good or bad this is an attempt, but it just needs to be considered as an attempt, they are both exaltation and not a matter of symbols . here, but do not pretend that this was not a historical period, including, because if we cross it

out, a void will form that will simply pick it up. that's all. we turned a blind eye to the banners. right there exalted. what conclusions did you draw, in principle, probably, from our discussion. you are somehow silent last. eh, there are minutes there, something to say, so the occasion is unconditional. i want to give my opinion. why is so much attention paid to the history of the great patriotic war? here, look, here are the people of my generation, because we all grew up with grandparents who went through this terrible war, yes, which not only won, they liberated the whole of europe. in addition , they restored it. and his country is absolutely destroyed. yes we are great we understand what minsk was like after the third year in the forty-fourth year, but nevertheless they restored it. at the same time, they retained positive and love for their homeland, so you know they are dying. they have already passed away . and if we do not tell our younger generation about this, we

will die defending the period of the great patriotic war. we are talking globally as a whole, and approaches to the study of the presentation of history. here is the president. well, as if the master class arranged. yes, she said a good master class for us a master class. such tight deadlines. still tell about the whole history of the country. and it's actually very interesting to look at and admired by the rest of the errand. if, for example, it must be, if we are talking about historians, historians will work. we are working these periods, we are also considering the principality of polotskatur to carry out research work in the archives. uh, scientific conference. and now valentina vasilievna remembered, uh, how it began in relation. uh, bread, uh peasantry. tomorrow we are holding, for example, a conference of the peasantry in the commonwealth and russian empire russian is the age. this is for scientists, scientists write so that

later alyona, in order to later get populated, there will be no academy, there will be no scientists, there will be no archives, there will be no what we popularize. that's when, e. cyril, they would have discussed their own periodization about their own. this is promotion. this is the real work of journalists who throw in pointwise such moments, and our task is to talk about a clear chronology, turov, polotsk and the rest of the principality there, and only in the complex everything together. we can force this or show love for history. if you love history, you love your country, and in my school years on september 1 there was a mouth called living in belarus and so. to live in a country with a rich ancient history, uh, it’s very nice and very honorable and it’s important that none of the historical periods be forgotten, then we will understand that we have really deep roots and we stand very firmly with both

feet on our land. they treat belarus with respect and warmth. and when i arrived in minsk, i. at first of all, i was struck by the wide streets. space and the sky for them is not just a second motherland. i don’t know how long god has allowed me to live, but i think i will live it in belarus and when they ask me, where do i say, i come from the city right here the characters found themselves determined their place in life. i am proud that i am here, and i will point out even more that i was allowed to lead a team of belarusians. in general, i believe that belarus is a blessed place, a special place, and this

place has a special mission. see the project look at belarus on our tv channel.

president of belarus alexander lukashenko met with the governor of the murmansk region of russia andrey chibis cooperation between belarus and this russian region is developing in various directions. in

particular, russian mining and processing companies show great interest in the equipment of the belarusian automobile plant. new contracts are being discussed now. belarus also expects to continue deliveries of passenger equipment to the murmansk region , including belkommunsh electric transport, minsk automobile plant specifically for the northern regions of russia produced a bus in the northern configuration. the president said that the masses have mastered them soon amkodor will start producing cars with chicken medical care may produce a wide range of equipment on order alexander lukashenko called food production a very important area of ​​cooperation. danger the president expressed confidence that the current visit of the delegation of the murmansk region will open a new stage of cooperation between belarus and this russian region. the head of state held meeting with the speaker of the upper house of the national assembly. natalia kachanova parliamentarian. they actively hold receptions of citizens and work with appeals from residents of the country. therefore, the president was interested in what

worries people today, first of all, it was about the prospects for the work of the council of the republic . i also met a lot of people lately. well, maybe not everyone will tell me how you are, so this is a very important second question. generally your plans e top parliament in the near future. thirdly, the expert council, when an expert council was created there. uh, in our senate, this is correct. because the senate is the chamber of experts of the parliament, we have strengthened this direction, what do you really see, and in what direction here? so that we can adopt more precise laws in our state. foreigners are increasingly applying for belarusian citizenship, this issue is under the

control of the head of state alexander lukashenko held a meeting last week on the perfection of non-legislation. in this area relevant officials. they made a number of proposals that caused discussion in society and among experts. in the first wave, in principle, we could see, uh, and feel, just the period of e-lockdowns, when europe was closing, and here, uh, appropriate measures were applied, but we did not close. we did not introduce any new measures in relation to the citizens of the enterprises, and we saw how even then citizens came from europe. perhaps for some separate period, but now we see that, hmm , representatives of european countries want come and get citizenship and stay here with us, belarus, because the situation in europe is getting worse. belarus will again switch to reference pricing for medicines, which it plans to do before the end of

the year, as the head of the ministry of antimonopoly regulation and trade explained on the sidelines of an international conference on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of antimonopoly regulation in belarus, this principle works in russia and it showed its effectiveness here before the pandemic. this is when determining the cost of the drug in its market. we we looked at how much it costs on similar ones, thereby the new approach will help to get away from price regulation, more stringent measures, and yet the temporary principle of free competition and not violating the anti-dominant position in the markets and antitrust principles of work - this is at the head of any state, but in difficult times of crisis. we have to apply more stringent price regulation measures. they may be different in our country. we actively use them, proceeding from the principle that these are temporary measures and better economic ways to rectify the situation, than by some permanent price. agrarians of the mogilev region are actively involved in the harvesting of corn