in the village, when you sing food, i'm walking through the village nowhere to be seen. anya i'm going i'm going through the village, the scoundrel is not visible, the spark. and when such a night happens, it is such a sonorous echo . how do i sing. well, not one, the equipment will not replace, real echoes are real sounding. so i think the village and the people who stayed. they also think the same as me. does it mean staying in your village? to be devoted to your little motherland

in our program, only the most pressing topics and questions. let's figure it out. why do we need these psychological superstructures. what is it beyond the boundaries of our self and where are we the real stars and expert psychotherapists, in fact, i am a well-deserved artist though. i am a very bad artist. well, i am very many consider it strange and a freak. yes, you see on the street ask around. i thought that if i suddenly had some hints for the crown , it means that my talent has become less than it is, they will teach me how to safely resolve any

conflict situations. we continue to dislike. i'm not insisting in any way. watch the program to understand and neutralize on the tv channel belarus 24. everything begins with the origins and traditions of the memory of our ancestors. preservation of the culture of belarusian rituals and crafts but the world is changing. changes generations views and creativity does not stand still. when people realize the value of traditions and understand where to move on, art takes on new bright colors. my name is olesya kuzminova, i am the

head of the department of television and radio broadcasting. today we will talk about journalism. you are watching the program say, do not be silent in the studio victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and visiting. today we have olesya kuzminova the youngest or the youngest. how to say journalism in the department? well, if according to the rules of the russian language, then it’s still young, but you prefer, and i prefer young, let’s start with your post on facebook olesya, who simply fascinated me, i work, i dream of showing off, i piss someone off, mostly not on purpose. i think that each of us will sign these words, but you piss me off with the next question,

because you can’t be beautiful like that or because you are smart. i think in different ways reasons, because some external qualities cause envy in someone, as well. does anyone else have a different point of view? basically attitude to life. this is also when we others can enrage someone. and how do you feel people manifest themselves in completely different ways, someone openly expresses their attitude. and someone can somehow substitute in this life, so everything is different. well , in fact, an optimist in life, therefore, i believe that we can overcome, in general, any problems, any obstacles. eh, and therefore the main thing - this is what we are substituted, sometimes we communicate. i'm going forward, i'm bending my line anyway uh-huh well, what's smart, you are probably among the developers of current

curricula and standards for the training of journalists for the entire republic , standards are being developed, yes. we are developing standards for journalism, and they have a state component. there is a component of the educational institution. accordingly, we set the tone for other universities as well. they are forced to adapt, then how they come up with a journalism department, respectively, so will work all universities across the country these rules. yes, by and large, there is some component that they can change depending on. each university, of course, has its own resources and its own view on a particular specialty, but still, journalism has been some kind of standard for many years. and therefore, i think, we still have a certain right to speak, nevertheless, as it should be, from the novelties of this year, we read that, from the third year. now yes students choose their specialization earlier. they chose the department of television there. there's a radio newspaper right away

it was now necessary to determine from the third year what this innovation is connected with, we wanted to make a definite one, let's say so. as universalism, because one way or another today you don’t know which edition you will end up with which employer? you need one day. you will be in the newspaper, then after some time you will be lured to television, or you yourself will feel that you need to go there, so the first 2 years there will be people. just the same, learn all sorts of skills that are connected, uh, with layout and web design, even a little uh, and dali already has them will receive skills in the production of television and radio content a little about shooting. yes , of course, we do not train cameramen, but nevertheless , about how to behave in the frame, specifically in terms of building shots, in terms of how shots are combined with each other, and so on. this is still a journalist should know. well, installation, of course, so the first we have two years. on the one hand , they are general education, that is, the main

disciplines. our students should also listen to the pluses in journalism component, it is such a universal one. technical skills and so on. it seems to me that such a trend would be in the european one, when up to 40 years old people are determined by what they would like to actually do . they will depend on their scores, that is, the higher your score, the more opportunities you have to get into the specialty that you really want. the score must be higher in order to get into the department of radio and television. actually, everything is changing a lot and this year the audiovis, after all, was a little bit in the lead, and you have all your son and last year it was like that, but i must say that this year there is not much difference between the specializations in the competition. everything, in principle, is exactly the same again as failures. if the scores are high, then i can choose anything. yes? well, yes, such a plan. yeah , that is, we are just trying

this format for the first time. i don’t mean that i didn’t have this before, that is, some time ago. yes people this is not something quite innovative people. at this time , they already studied under such a program, when they studied all together until a certain course, and then specializations were removed, but right now with a new generation of teachers with a new generation of students. we are restarting this option, but again, it's so interesting, it turns out that journalism is changing very quickly. this is a very dynamic area, and we understand that even this option will probably change. is it good or bad that you change right every year plans and standards. that is, is it normal, i think that yes, we are not mathematics, where, in principle, the main base is very, very solid , we must monitor what is happening now, and plus the student is changing very much. we want to attract more every year. listen to change plans. firstly, this is due to changes from the point of view of the ministry of

education, now the state component has changed, that is, this year, for example, political economy and the history of the belarusian state appeared in the plans. ah, before that there were slightly different disciplines in this part, so we were forced to change plans. and since we are changing, we can look at something , collect feedback, find out what employers think, find out what students think, and adjust accordingly. but, and then we just see that sometimes the student does not really understand. and why does he need a tv or radio profile, for example, and we are forced to look for some profiles that the student will hook for our education and constantly scold that there is no stability in it, do you really agree or not? or should or are you for the search? still, i'm probably for the search, because the most basic thing that journalists need is, of course, it remains. that is, in any case, regardless of what disciplines we offer, the main core is the ethics of a journalist. this is work with

information - these are the basic genres. that's it. everything else will remain here, we cannot but change, we are forced to change, because the sphere is changing, the requirements of the time are changing and students are changing. i would like to note that your training is practice oriented and since recently, you have been working closely with the radio company beltel and there is even a creative competition joint tvr, which we sometimes remember in this studio. let's see the teaser. the talk show is an entertaining belarusian talk show, and is called a mirror show for finding talent. first of all, we were pleased to see the caring eyes of young students who are focused on constructive and positive and who want to bring their creative thoughts and creative projects to life, right here at the faculty of journalism bsu in classrooms and recreations, and of course in

the body and radii equipped with modern equipment. this project rallied our students. if we all work together, the youth of teenagers, girls and boys, who are in a major position, young people who have devoted themselves to art, are going deviantly here, and they will also be given the opportunity to discuss various topics in the space sphere within the framework of this program. i think you viewers saw a lot of familiar faces on the screen, i think there are 14 journalists now. they read something at the journalism faculty. yes, it's only ours department, that is, of course. each department has full-time employees and part-time employees whose main place of work is the editorial office, and they come to us, so you said yes. indeed, recently. in general, this principle of work was always there when i studied journalism, we didn’t have a single practicing journalist, when

vyacheslav grigorievich bulatsky was our guest, he was also remembered about those times, and he convinced me, refreshed in memory that they really were. we just don't perceived as a one hanging editor c b, belarus today for 5 years. it's not mine, you can't say the teachers were people who both worked and combined. well, it may be with your parents. we didn’t have tv people, we now have the maximum number just like that. on practicing journalists, because in fact , again, the main thing is what is happening right now. and when students see that this person is both on the screen and with them in the audience. they trust him better. they have a better understanding of where they will work in the future, that it is required of them and it is better for you, because you do not have to retrain. then, when this student comes to you, and therefore it is very pleasing that journalists understand the importance of this coming to us. are they connected with the fact that you lost your

teachers in the twentieth year and there is no one to read, especially, well, or in the twentieth after the events of the twentieth, i can’t tell you that we had some kind of general trend that people like - they showed themselves and left and helped to leave a couple of months ago, or even days back. uh, dima is not a kononovich, who you read yes, but not an employee of my department, he read at the faculty of journalism, he is connected with periodicals with webs space for relations with bsu there it all goes on loudly. that is, well, as if there is a trend, but i am my dima nikonovich. first of all, the artist has always been like this, but he had a very interesting, ph.d. thesis, it concerned the management of a multimedia editorial office, and therefore he worked well with students in this path, but it didn’t work out that way. he is a human creative. as a result, it probably emotionally took him away. you think, it's not

political reasons, it's artistic reasons, i think, both, but i just can't say that, in principle, about journalism in general, because, well, look, we have 100 full-time employees. ah, again, in the twentieth year, back in august, we had meetings with corrections, and the departments and in your department had a video message against violence. why don't you confuse? no, i saw familiar people there on the same one, dima recorded there. this is not your camera. this is not my department, of course, but people were tense. uh, people were somewhere, and some things were confused. it was necessary to discuss and speak with them, because, of course, the amount of disinformation that fell on us was huge, there were literally two parallel realities. i like alice saying there was nothing on my pulpit. maybe some e people, i even

remember a photo e in one of the social networks, where on the porch of the faculty of journalism, but gathered, well, i won’t say that the crowd yes, well, a certain number of people in the front rows stood an employee of your department, let's talk about the porch. in general, this is a very interesting topic, in fact, because, as i have already begun to say, it exists. in fact, two very interesting parallel realities about 2020 are one reality. ready. again, how we were photographed and shown on the same current mirror of the then tut.bye. and what really existed. let's start with the fact that we do not exist alone in our corps. now we have a better security system. we have now very strict access system and so on. ah, but things were a little different back then. yes, i miss trying to check, but again, we have a journalism department, the faculty of philosophy of social sciences, the institute of business, some other specialties came to us, things

of view. ah, students. we knew specifically by sight those people who spoke literally. these were four people, four students, who later we left our university, but again, here they are all coolly talking about it, giving interviews, but at the same time, when i look at the photos on the porch. except them a bunch of unfamiliar faces of my students, namely audio visas, which i knew all the faces at that time there weren’t such situations, very interesting, when, for example, these photos appeared on the porch. including weekends. we didn't know who these people were. that is, they just came to take pictures, because the fact is. it was just the place, it was just the faculty that they really wanted to see. we blame you or someone else. we're just saying that it was her problem, for sure. need more somehow get rid of it, if bsu teachers are still loudly declaring, let it not be your

department of the same journalism department, that they are coming out, well, this is still going on. and if we say that we weren’t there in ours, we didn’t stand there. and in general, i'm fine. we close our eyes a little to the problems of our faculty, you know, it is the only one, it is loud in itself, but i would not like to. and so that the problem is still somewhat inflated, because if, for example, there are 10 people for a team of 113 full-time teachers, somewhere they lit up, somewhere they spoke out somewhere. and they, in principle, here is the same dmitry you remembered about, he is constantly in the role and then he just had another role by and large , it seems to me that someone got confused, someone needed time, olesya, i will not interrupt you for a long time. you know, we also have our insiders. there among the teachers. and when they read to students, some practical exercises and say, look at the plots. e tell do not be silent there or grisha enlightened or stupid editors

of the program. they say we don't watch television. you are so proud of them, you stand. but and who are the authorities for them, and who they watch, in fact, they can say anything that they don’t watch even then, but if you start a conversation with them about the content of these programs, sometimes they can very well support the conversation, therefore in a sense. certain to be cunning in that we don't watch your programs. they are integrated not only on the air, but also in the internet space today, thank god, and therefore, although you don’t or don’t want to, they still reach them watching tv. yes, yes, therefore, yes, today we are talking about television, not television, so that it doesn’t work out that way they are taught by those who are not interested in them, and i don’t need them. they're not going. in general, these do not work in the white radio company. and we have been teaching all these few years, starting from the twentieth student, in addition to classes with practices, there were classes, including stereotics. and we also talked about impact technologies and so on. but in

my experience of working in the same audience and within the framework of a couple within the framework of some extra-curricular meetings. and i also see the mood, at least, of my audios. i find it difficult answer. here for the entire faculty, in fact , but for somewhere around 100 people from four courses, with whom directly. i work most of it. still, they understand our media environment, and they are able to maintain a dialogue more or less constructively, they can explain why they like or dislike something specifically, but in this or that journalist, but hmm they can say. yes , i don’t want to be like grisha the lightning boy. well, then , of course, the dialogue on the topic of who you want to live is already beginning. i want to be myself this year we have invited a lot of interesting teachers, for example, students are waiting for igor tur vikusinkevich. and what about grisha azaryonka. we are still planning. e. i hope that also in time he will come to our students and tell them. some of

these students are dreaming about how to do original journalism. uh, blogging to become a famous blogger. you have recently included e in all profiles the discipline of blogging, and who teaches in some places ours and tv people. we have vloggers. we have not just blocking, we have video blogging, but many standards. they still crawl from the traditional ones. uh, on the internet, here we have young employees working for belarus 3 maksim tyutenkov. and a very good guy. he also defended his thesis and did research on video blogs and on a whim you teach, namely, based on some good theoretical calculations. it just seems to me that there really aren’t any experts, but that’s why we are trying to grope for something and try a cat in the same video blog. today it is very diverse. these are very different genres. it's a very different feed. here at we, by the way, now also have parallel discipline, author's journalism author 's journalism. it can be called a blog to some extent, but today,

let's take a short break. let's break , i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. offer guests we are in touch. on the air say it again, don't be silent. and today our guest is the head of the department of television and radio broadcasting of the faculty of journalism. bsu olesya kuzminova olesya you are the author of about 60 scientific publications, and also a laureate significant competition of the belarusian state university named after the furnace is for a cycle of works on the theory and practice of television journalism in the implementation of the information policy of belarus , in your opinion, a young scientist, where we are not finalizing in the implementation of state policy. we are not finalizing, probably, precisely in the strategies of working with different audiences, because it is absolutely different to talk to both the adult audience and the youth, and specifically the cycles of youth

programs. they are still in the minority today. here the question is somewhere in working with emotions our audience is somewhere in the delivery options, because then already in the twentieth we were forced to scream. and about those problems about what our opponents tried to throw in, you used emotions, used narratives. uh, and it was due to this that they somewhere drew attention to the neck of the audience. so we just talked about the need to speak differently with audiences. recently , the president held an open lesson for schoolchildren. let's see a small snippet. i'm just telling a joke. well, we do not claim them, so these boundaries have developed. here, at 1,500 km. it will not be possible here 1,500 km 1,000 km with the russian federation

. this is ours. this is ours. don't lose it. please for you as an educator it 's about what the signal is when the president picks up the pointer, so it's time to get serious about the field of education and in fact for me this is an open lesson. i watched it in its entirety. he was very on the one hand touching, because a was very paternal. it was an opportunity. uh guys hear firsthand. really. uh, what's going on and what's going on give your opinion. eh, and that's why it's a very good trend for me. first of all, you often mentioned in social networks the sphere of your interests - media impact media literacy and media safety. that is,

in short, call for information hygiene. true, yes, of course, today we ourselves are the media, and each of us ourselves . a-a is not only in real reality, but also in virtual reality, and therefore, of course, i would like people to somehow study with media faces, at least they understood what they were facing. e being in this environment and what are the options for behavior here, but for yourself, do you ever arrange, so to speak, an information detox, no gadgets, no social networks, no news, do not watch anything. it happens, sometimes i try, mostly it turns out in the summer, because during the school year. this is impossible , oles, you are calling for abandoning social networks. at the same time, you. speak in person. it's hard to do it. and i do not urge to refuse networks. i call competently with them work and realize in fact, and

some processes are recent. so you wrote, and itching to write about the various special effects of fb and instagram. what are we talking about that when we run our social network, we initially program it and just, and instagram and facebook they are especially susceptible to this, the fact that we like facebook understands what we like and , accordingly, it does not will show us what the machine itself thinks that we do not like, and we find ourselves in an information bubble. we only see one point of view which the car picked up for us by and large , and just in the twentieth - it played a cruel joke on us in many ways, because people thought that everyone around them thought the way they did, that is, that minority that actually held certain views. uh, it seemed to them that around, uh, everyone was engulfed, then the euphoria that they were engulfed and uh, would really play a big role in this. western social media. i agree with you. ah, i wrote

about it myself. my hands itched, and i texted 5,000 friends, but i saw. i'm in the twentieth year, only 20 of them, which were the most oruchi most active streamers tuned. how in general do you think? social networks are dangerous, to some extent, right? what they are dangerous for is that people are a little unaware. why are they posting certain materials, and this can lead to certain consequences. first, they themselves give information about themselves. and to whom they give they, in fact. they do n’t think about it, and it’s not about some kind of evil comments that will come to the page to spoil their mood. and the point is that data is also collected abroad, by and large, a very large layer of data, including ours, thanks to social networks. mm. it 's true. we fought for personal freedom so much that we ourselves gave them to these social networks. in our country , every step is fixed

; people of the older generation are simply horrified, they say how they did it. well, i mean, i don't know how they treated us like that. well, i know that for people to voluntarily post all personal information about themselves. about the family, thinking no consequences down to where i went. well, that is, if you go on vacation, we will definitely inform the whole world about it that we have gone. now, does this mean that the robbers can do their favorite duties, as, for example, hypothetically? yes, because you can set traps to help the state catch robbers in this way olesya, as a scientist , immediately thinks. and how can you use it to insist that i liked the phrase? maybe it was just said that people do not watch tv, but tv. yes absolutely, so there is a fundamental difference certainly. tv - it just seems today. ah, television viewing, it can be completely different. today,

everyone has a mobile phone and , accordingly, we, among other things, adapt the content for a new device, so we choose how the content comes to us. it is important for us that our media can adapt to this case. well, that is a phrase. and i don't have a tv. it is meaningless today. when i was doing a book on the youth tv audience, just, and many of me in this plan tried to reproach that television where where is our youth and so on. i did a very large survey of about 1,500 people. so they were asked questions in the spirit. and watch yes, do you really watch tv with which devices do you watch programs, again there was a list of programs, what do you know from this? which leaders do you know and so on. eh, so, they seemed to say at the beginning that they were not watching, then it turned out that it seemed to us that the priority was, they had a computer there. and somewhere also small phone.