well, i tried to be sincere, because in general you have to live not to live in a lie, you understand? i always try to do this, and apart from some forbidden ones, i am always open to those and always try to speak very sincerely. thank you very much. this was the meaning of vladimir orlov's life, everything changes very quickly, time passes imperceptibly minutes to days. we never have enough time to stop and think about those who are waiting for us at this very moment it is worth remembering those without whom we will be so lonely on this earth to say, you know, i miss or listen, dad, it is

now without delay for later it is necessary to say. i'm here, i'm here appreciate the time spent with your loved ones. propaganda although they are trying to offend us with this word, we continue to prove that propaganda can be different and even so subjective and lofty in the next 20 minutes. we will talk about the events of the past week. about the most important thing, but not only about it. my name is igor tura - this is my propaganda, let's start diversity, those that were considered or at least touched on last week can only be applauded and no one will convince me of

alexander lukashenko rolled up his sleeves in 2020 and began the process of modernization of the belarusian society, and continues to this day, while the modernization of the twentieth twenty-first and twenty-second years has different tactical tasks with a common strategic vector, the ultimate goal is for all of us to have better keywords here everyone has become better for everyone and for us, that is, the work of the president is aimed at everyone, and not just supporters or ardent supporters of the authorities on us, who are here at home, they see the future somehow differently and abroad, so that it became, and did not turn into a point on the horizon , and finally, lukashenka certainly does not try to return everything as it was before that very twentieth, and for our society to learn lessons and take a step up the ladder of social evolution, it is evolution, and not the revolution, and while lukashenka continues to work, rolling up his sleeves. here, as for me,

some representatives of the vertical of power at various levels have already reasoned backwards on the problem of 2020, which consisted in a partially successful attempt by external forces to fool a part of our society had reasons, not only in the external pressure of pumping money into rebellion. that's all. the rest were internal reasons. and this can just be called unrolled sleeves, where it was impossible to unroll sleeves, so now the president personally has to roll them out while talking about sleeves, but in the future their owners risk falling under the same process. let's go in order, on tuesday at the palace of independence, the following question was asked, is it not worth depriving the citizenship of those fugitives who openly work for the collapse of their country. are these people worthy to remain citizens of belarus if they fled from their native country and actually cut off contact with it, many deputies raised the question, yes, and

citizens. uh, ran away hurting criminals. in fact, they continue their criminal activity , it was proposed to deprive them of their citizenship, this is what we are talking about, therefore, today we will consider this version of the bill. to begin with, i will speak out for those of our opponents who are trying to blame the authorities in general and lukashenka in particular for allegedly trying to take away a small and radical part of society is right for belarusians. to call a nuance is that just to be called, you can do whatever you like here, you just don’t need to confuse nationality and citizenship. not in vain. after all, for example, in the passport of a citizen of belarus, nationality can be other than emotionality, a belarusian can be in the passport of another state, are those belarusians who advocated protests a riot and a coup d'etat in 2020, of course they are belarusians by nationality, their right is absolutely nobody claims. but citizenship is dear citizens and yet citizens

of a completely different citizenship. this is an institution of legal relations between a person and the state, expressed in the totality of their mutual rights and obligations. open a dictionary. it is exactly what it says there, that is, your passport is a guaranteed ticket to the wonderful world of a social state called belarus, this is actually an agreement that you yourself, as an individual, signed with the state system of the country. in any contract, there are rights and obligations. i would figuratively call the conditions of his imprisonment public offer contract, when the terms are publicly available for study and by signing the contract. you are obliged to comply with them. the state, which signed this agreement with you in the form of a passport, undertakes an obligation for your health education, integration into the economy, gives you the right to use assets and so on in exchange for you by the state. which party to the public offer agreement requires compliance with the system of rules within the state. and moreover

informs you in advance that the rules can and will change through decision of the president of parliament or government. before, it was possible to walk around minsk with a flag similar to the polish one. but now it’s impossible, the decision on this was made in full accordance with the agreement that you, as a citizen, signed with the state, leaving your autograph on your passport. you might like the changes in the rules. maybe you don't like it. in the first case, everything is fine, in the second, in the set of rules of the agreement, the public offer is clearly indicated, how can one disagree with the state of rallies on demand and coup d'état there, if a person systematically sharply arrogant grossly violates the terms of this treaty of citizenship, if he not only does not live by the rules, that is, according to the laws, but also tries in every possible way to change both the laws and the obligation to comply with them and those who guarantee the rule of law in the country the state as the second

equivalent party to the contract , expressed in the issuance of a passport, together with the rights of obligations for non-fulfillment of the contract, has every right to demand the termination of the contract, that is, to take away the passport, the most banal association of public transport. you bought a ticket for travel by paying money for transporting you from point a to point b but in a public offer agreement. at the same time, there is not only ab and the price, but also the rules for using public transport, where it is said that you cannot smoke in transport when buying a ticket. you agree to the price and itinerary from the terms of use. even if you didn’t read the rules before boarding, if you smoke on the bus, you violated the contract, your ticket can be canceled without bringing you to point b and does not return the money. so i am both hands for the deprivation of citizenship of those people who are belarusians and will remain belarusians by nationality no problems, but the citizenship agreement with the state, belarus these people grossly violated

the agreement, namely the passport, there are grounds to cancel. if someone thinks this is not democratic, i will quote the european convention on citizenship, which was signed by members of the council of europe in the ninety-seventh article, the third paragraph. the first each state determines in accordance with its legislation. who is it citizens, end of quote. yes, i know the weak point of my position is the line of the updated constitution of belarus, no one can be deprived of citizenship. and it seems like, and what then was discussed last week with the president, if it is impossible to deprive of citizenship under the constitution but two paragraphs below the constitution also says the following acquisition and termination of citizenship are carried out in accordance with the law, the presence in our main document of two seemingly contradictory friend of theses. i confess i was a little annoyed too. furious, i'm on my own stupidity. lawyers who

worked on the document do not eat their bread in vain, because the deprivation of citizenship and the termination of citizenship are legally two different processes. how to take away the passport of a citizen of belarus, his outright terrorist, who fled to poland by the procedure of termination of citizenship, which is not identical with the deprivation of citizenship and the constitution is not violated, it remains only to clearly state in the laws that there is a procedure for that very termination of citizenship, and not a single lawyer will undermine. and this is especially important now, because in september 2020 alexander lukashenko pressed the button sometimes illegally and was absolutely right at that time and in that situation, but in april 2022 alexander grigoryevich called the button another, you need to learn to live by the law, not by the directives of the presidential decrees and pointing with your finger where to go and how to live according to law.

the president tells us we need to learn to live by the law, that is, everyone and those who consider themselves an opponent of the authorities and politically neutral citizens and supporters of the authorities. this is what i mean, but what people have not yet moved away from the twentieth year, sometimes even excesses are allowed on the part of our supporters to wet everyone and so on. well, you know the unity in society. it was never added. i will allow myself to add to the president, when there is a phase of active war, then all means are good at war. everything is asleep, but above the fight there is always the law and according to the law. let's say insulting an official on the internet is punishable regardless of what and how he did, insulting in 2020, what political preferences he has for lukashenka or for someone else for everyone, although there are different periods of law, forced practices, but according to the strict letter it is

impossible. write a comment about the governor of the chairman of the district executive committee or deputy with a three-story obscenity. we need to learn to live by the law. the president says, that is, to all of us, and that is, if you need to learn, it means that while we do not know how, well, or we can not fully show how it should be. for example, i don’t believe in the amnesty of the frenzied in 2020 who went to break minsk and break minskers, residents of other cities of aggression on the internet. as for me, the percentage of those who sincerely repented there is minimal, but according to the law, such a decision is legal. it is true that the president can accept the pardon, taking responsibility for this decision, and alexander lukashenko on the same tuesday clarified all the nuances with his specialists. and here is what the head of state says about those who can fall under the amnesty among the convicts, there are a wide variety of them and those who accidentally stepped on, committed a crime out of neosto. as well as

minor crimes. well, let 's talk directly and some kind of protest over the past 2 years, everyone has become wiser , especially in remote places, and so the president is talking about those convicted under articles, including protest orientations, that is, the meeting on tuesday was not an amnesty for walkers. on the 20th, not only and even rather not according to them, but almost everyone perceived this meeting only as fateful for the bochevists, just as there were other illnesses in covid, and not only with us, condemned for riots. and while we're tinkering with the question. what to do with those august a good guy is sitting somewhere for the third year, who at the entrance to a nightclub protected a girl from drunken hooligans and accidentally cracked one. so here he fell hit his drunken head, and the curb and this infliction of grievous bodily harm, let it be through negligence and this good, but foolishly received a corner. the guy is somehow

offended that for 2 years everyone has been messing around with those who turned over the flowerpots and threw them into the riot police and are discussing whether they are worthy of an amnesty or not? at a time when amnesties are first of all worthy of those who are somehow not hype, stumbled, accidentally and sincerely regretted the legal crime in the first seconds. and i’ll also say the obvious. none of the protest convicts would have been released ahead of time if it weren’t for lukashenka’s kindness and his faith in the human soul and brain, because it seems to me that if the will of the majority of the participants in that meeting were to prosper, the issue of amnesty would flourish. i wouldn’t even get up, because if they are pardoned, they will return to what they sat down for . and i believe in a high probability of this, then there is already a conditional minister of the ministry of internal affairs hands and take to the streets to detain them. you need it no, but the rebels are lucky that they have lukashenka, who is sometimes unfair, but in the other direction towards the good and believes that people repent. although

alexander grigorievich asks me to go beyond the red lines, he does not go himself. some people can't wait for the president's kindness. we can't listen to a part of society there and left to right, uh, let everyone go and let out who should be in prison should still be in the meeting. talked about the map of the pole document, hybrid aggression. vs belarus from the side. warsaw generally does not control the issuance and circulation of any documents of a foreign state. we are at home. this is bad, as dual citizenship potentially greatly affects a person, especially if the second one is citizenship hostile to us in the country, and the pole card is actually a half-passport, is it true that something needs to be done about it. but as a binding procedure, we carried out a proposal that citizens who, having belarusian citizenship and receive citizenship of another country in a mandatory order informed the competent authorities, as

well as those citizens who have any benefits in the territory of another state. now i'm talking about the pole's card and other documents without fail, so that they inform the competent authorities of the republic of belarus. with all due respect to the ministry of internal affairs and personally to general kurakov. it seems that obliging everyone who has a pole's card to inform the competent authorities about its presence will not give a particularly massive effect. after all, we are not interested in law-abiding citizens, who may well come with informing the police. and just others who are behind the plinth, they inform in jambs. well, they definitely won't. and here's how to find them carefully inspect everyone on the border with poland, this paralyzes the checkpoint to check for. what if then these are not countermeasures, but the selectivity of punishment, one was unlucky, he got caught. and a hundred others i got the initiative. this is wonderful, but the mechanism is not yet clear,

however, with regard to the next specific measure here with both hands. i am for this information. we can use when assigning to some government posts information. we can take into account this information on a social level, whether it is receiving a pension or something else, and some benefits, who has a document of influence of a foreign state, a passport card, some even outline them to the state administration. belarus has nothing to do. that's all. and at this moment , it is possible and necessary to check everyone, both applicants for public office and current civil servants, with all the tools, operational-search activities, and finally, the friday meeting with the participation of the president. i will offer you two a fragment on different topics, but with one general vector of what alexander grigorievich does first about the initiative in the field of entrepreneurship and business. come on,

that you are administrative pressure on business and so on, no one puts pressure on anyone, they check the payment of taxes and we will check it. and now , also about business, but specifically about farmsteads here near the city. in beautiful places under the guise of agro-ecotourism built hotels for god's sake. i don't mind but pay your taxes like all hotel complexes know how to put it simply, what lukashenka is fighting against, the stereotype that has been preserved in our society that it is not only not mean and not ashamed to deceive and financially throw the state, but in some circles it is also honorable and don’t be hypocrites. those who are against everything know perfectly well how massively individual entrepreneurs were opened only in order not to hire employees and not pay taxes. or, under an individual entrepreneur with a huge turnover for an individual entrepreneur, but

in fact a micro-organization with salaries in envelopes was hiding. or how the documents for the farmstead were drawn up with taxes on the bottom in hotels on two floors 10 km from the regional center, in which and behind grou estates. there is only paw over the entrance and potato pancakes on the menu. these are particulars that are being decided, but in our society there is such a deceived state that he did not pay extra taxes, he cunningly received benefits to which you have no right, not only not ashamed, but also well done. show off, in front of everyone, how cleverly. you told about the country and the budget, and after all, some people really think, well done, what a deceived state umnichka a. then they suddenly have a bad president seriously. what about with another president, they will all stop trying to deceive the state and throw it for money is ridiculous. well, alexander grigoryevich seems to have dealt with this and these in detail, and this is the best news for me of the past week. my name is igor tur. it was my propaganda

restoration center i want to say that at the end of last year we had a new building opened after reconstruction, which we called the restoration building restorers. moved from adapted premises to new bright premises 14 restoration workshops accompanying technical room, for example for varnishing for photo fixation and so on. e, etc. what is the difference? firstly. uh, new premises -

this is a new air conditioning system , ventilation, temperature and humidity conditions, because the subject. it must also be preserved even during restoration under certain conditions, these conditions. uh, created a department of scientific restoration workshops for today. these are four sectors of the ancient belarusian art sector, which occupies. restorations of sacred works painting sector of oil painting, and most of all in our collection. these are canvases. there is a very large variety of such works in the sector of decorative applied arts. why because this and the restoration of furniture, metal products, graphic products, the restoration of polychrome metal sculpture frames, and so on, and a small but extremely important sector of physical and chemical research. uh, because it is impossible

to start the restoration of a museum object without preliminary research. this is now a common global practice. here you are restore the fund of your museum and other state museums. do private collectors contact you. so we have the opportunity and offer to restore for any legal entities and individuals. what is the main criterion? the main thing is that these should be objects of museum value, that is, that they have historical and cultural value, but we do this on a contractual basis. yes , there were foreign clients who contacted us. uh, there was such a case a couple of years ago there is a private museum of russian art in riga in latvia and presented this museum arrived. uh, they brought a few works to show us, can you restore, we agreed, we took the

contract for the restoration, too. after that they returned again. they showed the results of our restoration. abroad , the restoration was fairly well appreciated. and they chose our museum in terms of price-quality ratio and only interrupted our cooperation with the pandemic. this is the coronavirus, and before that they had already started. determined by the regularity of bringing his paintings, but in general, is there an international cooperation in the field of restoration internships some exchange restorers cannot be in a vacuum, in any country, including this also applies to the belarusian christ there we are also interested in exchanges, so our restorers are especially young. we want them to have an internship somewhere, go somewhere , and i can say that we have, uh, many restorers were on probation. in addition, our museum was the initiator of the event. e for the

first time. by the way, it was an international conference for the first time in our country, yes, belarus international conference, which was dedicated specifically to the issues of restoration, we are looking for and trying to use all the opportunities for interaction. what is the role of youth in the religious life of the country ? and is also particularly noticeable in church life in general. through what experience it is necessary to go through in order to realize the deep meaning of the faith, you are the goat skin way, faithful , i notify and understand more, great. price was paid for us by a citizen. what should a believer do to get closer to god

on the path dovets our tyan. better they ride sopovin. betty gave him a faithful word of thought and christian men waited and gave the same freedom. we invite him into the heart or not, see the spirits. holy projects on belarus 24 tv channel today we are preparing a very tasty hearty and high-calorie dish. well, like you intrigued me at the mud volcano, there may be one such gurgle that can harm you and its environment gives your whole kitchen. i used to there was a cook making cutlets. and now i'm all at home. i give advice to make lightly salted grandmother's cucumbers. yes, moreover, a lightly salted

celery stalk. you raise, look at the culinary show belarusian cuisine on our tv channel.