what is the role of youth in the religious life of the country, but in fact, when you enter the temple, and among people of respectable age, our youth. she, uh, is especially noticeable in the temple and is also especially noticeable. and in general, in church life, through what experience it is necessary to go through in order to realize the deep meaning of the faith , you walked, e, kryzhov and the path of the skin faithful more than a date and a mind like iron. she was paid for us sinners. what should a believer do to get closer to god on a path? yes, forever. better they esusa. blame him with a true thoughtful word and christian scientists, but he waits and gives. yes, we have freedom. and we are already deciding whether to invite him into our hearts or not. look, spiritual and educational projects on

belarus 24 tv channel. propaganda although they try to offend us with this word, we continue to prove that propaganda can be different and even so subjective and lofty in the next 20 minutes. we will talk about the events of the past week. about the most important thing, but not only about it. my name is igor tura - this is my propaganda, let's start diversity, those that were considered last week or at least if you are affected, you can only applaud and no one will convince me of one thing alexander lukashenko rolled up his sleeves in 2020 and began the process of modernizing the belarusian society, and continues to this day, while the modernization of the twentieth

twenty-first and twenty-second years has different tactical tasks while general strategic vector, the ultimate goal is for all of us to become the best keywords here every and for all of us to become better, that is, the work of the president is aimed at everyone, and not just supporters or ardent supporters power on us, who are here at home, they see the future somehow differently from abroad, so that they become a point on the horizon and finally, better lukashenka certainly does not try to return everything as it was before that very twentieth, and so that our society learned lessons and took a step up the ladder of social evolution, namely evolution, and not revolution, and while lukashenka continues to work, rolling up his sleeves. here, as for me, some representatives of the vertical of power at various levels have already reasoned back on the issue of 2020, which was partly a successful attempt by external forces to fool a part of our

society, there were reasons, not only in the external pressure of pumping money into rebellion. that's all. the rest were internal reasons. and this can just be called unrolled sleeves, where it was impossible to unroll sleeves, so now the president personally has to roll them out while talking about sleeves, but in the future their owners risk falling under the same process. let's go in order, on tuesday , the following sounded in the palace of independence the question is, is it not worth depriving the citizenship of those fugitives who openly work for the collapse of their country. are these people worthy to remain citizens of belarus if they fled from their native country and actually broke off the connection, many deputies raised the question, yes, and citizens. uh, ran away hurting criminals. in fact, they continue their criminal activity , it was proposed to deprive them of their citizenship, this is what we are talking about, therefore, today we will consider this

version of the bill. to begin with, i will speak out for those of our opponents who are trying blame the authorities in general and lukashenka in particular for allegedly trying to take away the right of belarusians from a small and radical part of society. to call a nuance is that just to be called, you can do whatever you like here, you just don’t need to confuse nationality and citizenship. not in vain. after all, for example, in the passport of a citizen of belarus, nationality can be other than emotionality, a belarusian can be in the passport of another state, are those belarusians who advocated protests a riot and a coup in 2020, of course they are belarusians by nationality, absolutely no one claims this right of theirs. but citizenship is dear citizens, and yet citizens are a completely different citizenship. this is an institution of legal relations between a person and the state, expressed in the totality of their mutual rights and obligations. open a dictionary. it is exactly what it says there, that is,

your passport is a guaranteed ticket to the wonderful world of a social state called belarus, this is actually an agreement that you yourself, as an individual, signed with the state system of the country. in any contract, there are rights and obligations. i would figuratively call the conditions for concluding it a public offer contract, when the conditions are publicly available for study and by signing the contract. you are obliged to comply with them. the state, which signed this agreement with you in the form of a passport, assumes an obligation for your health, education, integration into the economy, gives you the right to use assets , and so on. states. and more than that informs you in advance that the rules for this can and will change through the decision of the president of parliament or government. before, it was possible to walk around minsk with a flag similar to the polish one. but

now it’s impossible, the decision on this was made in full accordance with the agreement that you, as a citizen, signed with the state, leaving your autograph on your passport. you might like the changes in the rules. maybe you don't like it. in the first case, everything is fine, in the second, in the set of rules of the contract, the public offer is clearly indicated, how can you not there are no rallies on demand and coups d'etat with the state. if a person systematically sharply arrogant grossly violates the terms of this agreement, citizenship, if he not only does not live by the rules, that is, according to the laws, but also tries in every possible way to change both the laws and the obligation to fulfill them and those who guarantees in the country, the legitimacy of the state as a second equivalent. to the agreement expressed in the issuance of a passport, together with the rights of obligations for non-fulfillment of the contract, has the full right to demand the termination of the contract, that is, to take passport, the most banal

public transport association. you bought a ticket for travel by paying money for transporting you from point a to point b. but the contract contains a public offer, while there is not only ab and the price, but also the rules for using public transport, where it is said that you cannot smoke in transport when buying a ticket. you agree to the price and itinerary from the terms of use. even if you didn’t read the rules before boarding, if you smoke on the bus, you violated the contract, your ticket can be canceled without bringing you to point b and does not return the money. so i am in favor of depriving the citizenship of those people who are belarusians and will remain belarusians by nationality, no problems, but the citizenship agreement with the state, belarus. these people grossly violated the agreement, namely the passport, there are grounds to cancel. if someone thinks this is not democratic, i will quote the european convention on citizenship, which was signed by members of the council of europe in the ninety-seventh

article, the third paragraph. the first each state determines in accordance with by its legislation. who are its citizens, end of quote. yes, i know the weak point of my position is the line of the updated constitution, no one can be deprived of citizenship. and it seems like, and what then was discussed last week with the president, if it is impossible to deprive of citizenship under the constitution but two paragraphs below the constitution also says the following acquisition and termination of citizenship are carried out in accordance with the law, the presence in our main document of two seemingly contradictory friend of theses. i confess i was a little annoyed too. furious, i'm on my own stupidity. lawyers who worked on the document do not eat their bread in vain, because the deprivation of citizenship and the termination of citizenship are legally two different processes. how to take away the passport of a citizen of

belarus, his outright terrorist, who fled to poland by the procedure of termination of citizenship, which is not identical with the deprivation of citizenship and the constitution is not violated, it remains only to clearly state in the laws that there is a procedure for that very termination of citizenship, and not a single lawyer will undermine. and this is especially important now, because in september 2020 alexander lukashenko pressed the button sometimes illegal and was absolutely right at that time and in that situation, but in april 2022 alexander grigoryevich called another button, you need to learn to live according to the law not according to directives. the president and pointing the finger where to go and how to live by the law, the president tells us we need to learn to live by the law, that is, everyone and those who consider themselves an opponent of the government and politically neutral citizens and supporters of the government. i'm what, but

what people have not yet moved away from that twentieth years, sometimes even excesses are allowed on the part of our supporters. wetting everyone to plant and so on. well, you know the unity in society. it was never added. i allow myself to add the president, when there is a phase of an active war, then all means are good on it in the war, the war is still sleeping, but the national fight is always the law and according to the law. let's say insulting an official on the internet is punishable regardless of what and how he did, insulting in 2020, what political preferences does he have for lukashenka or for someone else? the law is the same for all, though there are different periods of law enforcement practice, but according to the strict letter, one cannot write with impunity about the governor, the chairman of the district executive committee or a deputy, a comment with a three-story obscenity. we need to learn to live by the law. the president is speaking, that is, to all of us, and that is. if you need to

learn, it means that while we do not know how, but or we can not fully show how it should be. for example, i don’t believe in the amnesty of the frenzied in 2020 who went to break minsk and break minskers, residents of other cities of aggression on the internet. as for me, the percentage of those who sincerely repented there is minimal, but according to the law such a decision is legal. it is true that the president can accept the pardon, taking responsibility for this decision, and alexander lukashenko on the same tuesday clarified all the nuances with his specialists. and here is what the head of state says about those who may fall under the amnesty among the convicts. various people including those who accidentally stepped on the one who committed a crime through negligence, as well as minor crimes. well, let's speak frankly and protest some kind of orientation for over the past 2 years, everyone has become wiser, especially in remote places, and so the president

is talking about those convicted under articles, including protests, that is, the meeting on tuesday was not on an amnesty for walkers. on the 20th, not only and even rather not according to them, but almost everyone perceived this meeting only as a fateful one for the bochevists, just as there were other illnesses during covid. so it’s not just that we have a convict on counts. and while we're tinkering with the question. what to do with those august ones , a good guy is sitting somewhere for the third year, who at the entrance to the nightclub protected the girl from drunken hooligans and accidentally cracked one. so here he fell, hit his drunken head, and the curb and this application. bodily injuries, even if by negligence, and this good, but stupidly received a criminal guy is somehow insulting that for 2 years everyone has been messing around with those who turned over the flowerpots and threw them into the riot police and discuss whether they deserve an amnesty or not? at a time when amnesties are first of all worthy of those who are somehow not hyped,

stumbled, accidentally and sincerely regretted legal crime in the first seconds. and i’ll also say the obvious. none of the protest convicts would have been released ahead of time if it weren’t for the kindness of lukashenka and his faith in the human soul and brain, because it seems to me that if the will of the majority of the participants in that meeting, the issue of amnesty against the installation would not even rose, because if they are pardoned, they will return to what they sat down for. and i believe in a high probability of this, then the same conditional minister of the ministry of internal affairs will again take the baton in his hands and take to the streets to detain them. he needs it no but rebels are lucky that they have lukashenka, who is sometimes unfair, but in the other direction towards goodness and believes that people repent. although alexander grigorievich asks me to go beyond the red lines, he does not go himself. some people can't wait for the president's kindness. we can't listen to a

part of society there and left to right, uh, let everyone go and let out who should be in prison should still be in the meeting. they talked about the map of the poles document, a hybrid aggression against belarus from the outside. warsaw in general uncontrolled issuance and circulation of any documents of a foreign state. we are at home. this is bad, as dual citizenship potentially greatly affects a person, especially if the second one is citizenship hostile to us in the country, and the pole card is actually a half-passport, is it true that something needs to be done about it. but as a consequence, we have made a proposal that citizens who, having belarusian citizenship and receive citizenship of another country, must inform the competent authorities, and also those citizens who have any benefits in the territory of another state. now i'm talking about the pole's card and other documents without fail, so that they

inform the competent authorities of the republic of belarus. with all due respect to the ministry of internal affairs and personally to general kurakov. it seems that obliging everyone who has a pole's card to inform the competent authorities about its presence will not give a particularly massive effect. after all, we are not interested in law-abiding citizens, who may well come with information to the police, but just others who behind the plinth they will inform in jambs, well, they definitely won’t go. and here's how to find them carefully inspect everyone at the border with poland, this paralyzes the checkpoint to check for. what if then these are not countermeasures, but the selectivity of punishment, one was unlucky. he got caught, and i came across hundreds of others. this is a wonderful initiative, but i still don’t understand the mechanism, however, with regard to the next specific measure, here with both hands. i am for this information. we can use when appointing to some government positions information. we can take

this information into account socially. there , they receive a pension, or something else, and some benefits, who have a document of influence of a foreign state, a passport , some cards, even outline them to the state administration. belarus has nothing to do. that's all. and at this moment , it is possible and necessary to check everyone, both applicants for public office and current civil servants, with all the tools, operational-search activities, and finally, the friday meeting with the participation of the president. i will offer you two a fragment on different topics, but with one general vector of what alexander grigorievich does first about the initiative in the field of entrepreneurship and business. come on, that you are administrative pressure on business and so on, no one is putting pressure on anyone. they check the payment of taxes and we will check it, and now also about business, but specifically about the farmsteads

here near the city. in beautiful places under the guise of agro-ecotourism built hotels for god's sake. i don't mind but pay your taxes like all hotel complexes know how to put it simply, what lukashenka is fighting against, the stereotype that has been preserved in our society that it is not only not mean and not ashamed to deceive and financially throw the state, but in some circles it is also honorable and don’t be hypocrites. those who are against everything know perfectly well how massively individual entrepreneurs were opened only in order not to hire employees and not pay taxes. or, under an individual entrepreneur with a huge turnover for an individual entrepreneur, but in fact a micro-organization with salaries in envelopes was hiding. or how the documents for the farmstead were drawn up with taxes on the bottom in hotels on two

floors 10 km from the regional center, in which the loading of the estate is only to paw over the entrance and potato pancakes on the menu are particulars that are decided, but in our society there is such a deceived state did not pay extra taxes cunningly received benefits , to which you have no right, not only not ashamed, but well done. show off to everyone how smart you are. you told about the country and the budget, and after all, some people really think, well done, what a deceived state umnichka a. then they suddenly have a bad president seriously. what about with another president, they will all stop trying to deceive the state and throw it for money is ridiculous. well, alexander grigoryevich seems to have dealt with this and these in detail, and this is the best news for me of the past week. my name is igor tur. it was my propaganda what

successes in seed production are bearing fruit, let's say your work, more than 80 percent of the tower of the republic of belarus is occupied by varieties created by our scientific and practical center. these are the varieties of the main economic crops, which largely determine the basis of the food security of our state, 38 crops are in the process of selection study by our scientists, and a system has been created for each of these crops. cakes of various directions using different ripening periods for crops for agricultural enterprises in our regions, both in general for the country and for individual regions of which crops do you work today? what can be agricultural crops today in priority ah, the priority, of course,

remains with us. uh, for those crops that occupy the largest area. it one and spring wheat are barley, brewing fodder. this is the third potassium, the main forage crop, of course, winters are slavery, of course, high-protein leguminous crops are the direction that is now especially relevant for our state, but do not forget crops that do not occupy large areas, but they are needed to feed our population . well, buckwheat, for example, so we are breeding almost all crops, uh, and these are lectures of the same degree of intensity, it doesn’t matter if this culture is for million hectares or is it a crop for 30,000 hectares, we are not limited to our territory and yet, agricultural crops in our country do not occupy such large areas, therefore, as our goal. we put the exit on