when the tour - this is my propaganda will begin. let's talk a little more substantively today, on one of my favorite topics of recent years , that the president is not only a position, the role of the leader and leader of the nation, the president is also a person, the personality of alexander grigoryevich lukashenko, although the head of state himself often repeats, just the opposite says that the president is not a person. this is already a machine, meaning a political managerial machine, but i still continue to insist that we all should not forget what kind of person is at the helm of our state, especially since i remember. i can always find it in any dumb situation, alexander grigorievich's insuring quote will do in this case. this is what presidents will not stop, presidents are born. moreover , there is a special reason to pay attention to the purely human quality of lukashenka. now i dare to suggest that before this period, when the whole world is on fire and on the brink of nuclear war. we underestimated the man who held sovereignty for nearly three decades. and the motherland and now

under external pressure, we are just beginning to carefully look at who our leader is and what kind of person he is and in our political model the human quality of the leader of the state plays a very important role let's start with history older viewers will agree that in the nineties when belarus only gained and completely suddenly independence is impossible to say that those who wanted to get power took a queue from minsk to mogilev here. now, of course, when the vertical of control has been built, when the economy is working, everything is in order in the social sphere. today already wishing to steer the car. and a small cart, such a small runaway cart. and why was it necessary to rush to power in the nineties, what the president received, then the economy, the half-starved severely unemployed, the population, the absence of any contacts on the world stage, spin as you like, i would have looked at how all sorts of radicals were in the nineties bloggers who are husbands. domestic wives would be downloaded by the people

of a video about how bad everything is in the country, they would not surprise anyone with this, everyone knows that everything is very bad to do what you offer, blogger. or i would look at all sorts of bankers rushing to power later, but did they need this power then in the nineties, when in the country, then inactive, then troubled unprofitable. what does one do with it when the loan portfolio is recruited? well, it’s completely unpleasant, or some representative of the fashionable high-tech sphere, who, like that spinning top, also wanted to bite off a tank of power in 2020. but then in the nineties they needed power, when there were high technologies in belarus. is that the color scores. and why lukashenka needed power, you know the thesis of our opponents that lukashenka holds on to power with blue fingers that he allegedly enriches himself in belarus, that in general, complete nonsense is broken very simply lukashenka came to power when in the country and take something there was nothing special. and what could be taken or given for momentary

financing? he didn’t give up there are three categories of people and exactly the same three categories of people in politics sheep wolves and shepherd dogs sheep are born to be part of something collective; they don’t have a pronounced personal needs and, to put it mildly, hard to achieve personal benefits. they go with the flow. here, as it is, people will come down, wolves are naturally endowed with aggression, thanks to which they tear apart a sheep that has fallen on the road, which keeps the whole herd in fear, wolves often achieve personal success, sweeping away everyone who interferes with them with any methods. and if people are shepherd dogs, who by nature are also endowed with the same aggression, like the wolves, but they transferred this aggression into a creative channel. they have an inner need protect from the wolves and from any other threats and the whole herd and each sheep individually. and even takes care of the wolves. if they agree to leave the sheep alone, in this the meaning of their life is not in their personal well-being. service to society is an instrument of action, while the shepherd dog is

different and softer, when the lamb is gently pushed with its nose in the right direction and a little harder with a loud, scary bark, which some sheep are very afraid of, and which they are very offended by, unable to understand that all this is being done. for them, for the sheep the shepherd also has strong teeth, without which to tear to shreds any wolf that coveted the entrusted flock. it's just impossible and periodically some kind of wolf. it is necessary to show that it is necessary to tear to shreds so that the rest would not be accustomed and that there would not even be thoughts of attacking the poor sheep of such people, shepherd dogs, units in thousands , tens and hundreds of thousands of people, such people most often become representatives of the power bloc, but they are in different areas in economics in the social sector in sports. maybe in journalism. and such is our president we we don’t talk about this much and somehow quietly, but according to his psychotype, alexander lukashenko is a person who was born to protect the weak and not let people offend, he has an inner

need for this, without this his life. it seems pointless in theory it looks. well, it’s very noble in practice, it’s not so simple, because for life. here’s a personal trait that’s very inconvenient for such people. family, close friends are always offended. after all , there is not much time left for them and they are not a priority. and all the people alexander after all, apart from the fact that he is the president, he is also the father, grandfather, friend, you think, all of them lack their alexander grigorievich, because their alexander grigoryevich does not belong to them, as well as to himself. he belongs to the people and all in this his vital need. we are very lucky that once upon a time just such a person came to power in belarus, you know, i took a photo yesterday . an interesting conversation with the president of kazakhstan, he is a former diplomat, a very smart person who knows a lot of languages. i always appreciate his advice and even support, and he approached

i have a lot of talk now about the sovereignty of independence, who is right? who is to blame? whoever attacks whom, then defending his interests very much, he came up to me and said alexander. you know, i remember one of your speeches. sorry for the indiscretion, very wise. i say, what is the wisdom? what is the thesis? i put it up there. and he says you said it very simply. the disputes came about, where is ukraine, where is russia, where is belarus, there were such states as belarusians, and then he says, you said such a phrase. well, well, well, there was no belarus at some time, but now it exists and it must be taken into account. and here is also the acquired political experience, which lukashenka demonstrated improvisation on the stage of the minsk arena on saturday at the celebration in honor of the day of national unity,

because in the above-mentioned fragment , the speech that alexander grigoryevich personally addressed only the people and the state to the turf was not only to belarusians, but also to that interlocutor, that is, such a one. with a reminder of that conversation, they say i didn’t forget. in general, our electoral legislation, according to which to become president. anyone can, i don't like it, and i really hope that the current head of the cic will initiate changes. i will never understand. why does a completely inexperienced even, maybe a popular person come to power. it is possible for us. so you would like your enterprise to be run by someone who is not competent, and according to lukashenko’s enthusiasm, he has tremendous experience gained over the years of turning belarus from a country of a fragment of the ussr into a strong independent state. so let him be president for as long as he sees fit and possible, because he can

to say and do something that absolutely no one else in the country can push us, now to the left, now to the right, then divide and cut from east to west, if we live on our own land. we will value it not to give it away to anyone and we will sacredly keep our sovereignty over this territory. therefore, the personal aside, only the people, only the state, and finally, the anthem. why do i periodically observe people groaning from discontent who stand up to the anthem, but without enthusiasm, to put it mildly, they grumble and grumble , because they didn’t and most likely will never do anything to invest in their country's anthem. at least a little of their efforts in the anthem. there is a part of everyone who hears him at the ceremony of awarding himself with a state award in the anthem on dozhenki. there is good work. khlebarova. in a hymn. at the summits. there is a life of diplomats and economists. your perception

of the anthem is your contribution to its state, it may not exist even then. yes, the anthem is not sacred for you, but millions of people have done something to make our anthem sound in the city, and thousands of people have sacrificed their personal ambitions and served this state and all the people for them proudly sounding hymns the meaning of life. if you don't understand it, you simply can't understand it.

our anthem will now proudly sound at the level of the organization, which will become the most influential in the world. i just need a little time about the shanghai cooperation organization, whose forum lukashenka visited last week, the main thing is that we are becoming a full member of the sco. it is already now that the shanghai organization is being looked at as the future of our planet, as a very influential. uh, pole uh, our planet was not like that then, but at that time we determined that we would develop our cooperation with the shanghai organization in this our political and economic future may be. it's time for us to become a full member of our shamkhan family. a lot was said about the summit last week by all my colleagues. yes, and yesterday's releases

of all the final ones of all tv channels worked out the official part of the sco forum from a to z. now i'm talking about something else. we are talking about lukashenka man and despite the fact that alexander grigorievich likes to repeat that there are no friends in politics, but our president knows how to make friends and make friends honest in conscience. we have already mentioned kazakhstan and despite the fact that nursultan nazarbayev is no longer the president of this country. his friend alexander lukashenko, for the sake of the political situation , did not turn away from nursultan abishevich. perhaps someday the president will talk about this in detail. lukashenka does not turn away from friends last week alexander grigoryevich met with the prime minister shahbaz sharif of pakistan, the nuance is that this is the younger brother of nawaz, sharif four times the prime minister of pakistan and a good friend of lukashenka. and an even more important nuance is that the elder sharif was removed from office several years ago due to the initiation of a

criminal case in absentia sentenced and later arrested, but these cases of pakistan and their politics, but for lukashenka, sharif, as he was a friend, does not turn away from friends for the sake of the conjuncture. and lukashenka says the following to the junior sharif. what kind of relationship would you have with your brother. you should know that this is my good friend e with the previous heads of state of pakistan meeting i constantly not looking at their beliefs of the relationship with the new one. uh, i asked him about his health , where he is, and you know, they always told me frankly about yours, brother, from the point of view of politics in pakistan, the authorities, probably, were a little stunned by these words, because here and now it is not customary to remember the ex-premier with a good word, but from a human point of view

alyaksandr lukashenka shows by personal example that it is low to betray. and no matter what the situation of a friend was. this is not a reason to turn away from a friend. and that is why lukashenka has friends in politics. he knows how to make friends, not like a president. and just what a smart guy. know that we have always supported china in all matters of principle. and even if someone wanted to reproach us for something, they would not have found such a reason, so we will always be reliable friends, no matter what we should. if we have promised this , we will adhere to this policy and practice. or here is uzbekistan with the president of which is soviet mirziyoyev. lukashenka also has good relations, but they were the same with his predecessor islam karimov karimov's legacy is assessed differently in tashkent and samarkand today, but for alexander

grigoryevich this is not a reason to throw stones at the image of a friend. everything is fine. i relate to the first president of your thoughts were good relations. do you remember, well, the fact is the fact you , well, you just did what you needed to go through, yes, and you are going now, so the blade a knife on thin ice, so as not to overturn the country and, most importantly, the president and the eastern countries, and they make up the backbone of the sco. somewhere they may be offended by lukashenka as president for something, and this happened from tashkent to baku and other sovereign capitals, but purely humanly they are all sure that no one will hit lukashenka in the back. yes, he may not say the most pleasant thing in person, but this cannot be taken away from our leader, but this is the essence of honest human friendship, which, in our belarusian understanding of politics, is underestimated. as for strictly big politics and the role of the sco already with belarus in the world,

president lukashenko stubbornly repeats plus or minus the same thesis, it is important that he be heard for more than one year in politics. and i watched very carefully how, after the formation of the shanghai cooperation organization, it fought for its leadership as a regional leader. the world has changed significantly for everyone and we state that this world will no longer be the same as it was before and the views, as they used to say of all progressive mankind, are turned to our organization shanghai cooperation organization. and perhaps surprisingly, for some of us , the shanghai cooperation organization is transforming from a regional organization into a global one. and the most important thing now is not to miss this moment when lukashenka leaves. this is a fact, and we will all write

analytical materials about how he was president to evaluate the successes of his policy, which will naturally leave a colossal mark in the history of belarus, but now we all should not forget that lukashenka sacrificed his personal life for the sake of this the most difficult task in the country and at the same time he did it with honor without giving, neither his friends nor people to demand the same from them. what really, there must be a difficult task to be with a friend of lukashenka, because alexander grigoryevich puts forward a demand for friends for sure, colossal and reacts sharply to a disregard for understanding. friendship for some reason. it seems to me that lukashenko demands sacrifice from all his friends. society if a person is not like that, then it is difficult for the president to be friends with him or her. but if that same sacrifice, or there is honor or valor, then such people become special for the head of state. i will pay attention to one

very young citizen of belarus present here with a huge heart. today we are presenting a medal for the saved life to bogdan to the eighth grade students of the makan secondary school. it was he who carried two sisters out of the fire. such heroes should be in belarus. and alexander grigoryevich, like a human being, likes to joke. i once said in one of my programs that lukashenka was probably a rational hooligan in his youth he remained a hooligan in politics, and thank god all of them were workers, but not received. the main thing is that there are no exaggerated marovets in poland.

frozen yes, a burden, well, these are our neighbors, if suddenly someone does not appreciate that the president already chopped firewood in a video in a telegram channel. god forbid that someone after him did not break these firewood. i'm personally proud that my president is not a bore and is not stuffy, and all officials should be like that. my name is igor tur. this was my propaganda, our program for those who are interested in their health. received today i was absolutely afraid of the injection and immediately got up, in fact, like a miracle, some urgent questions and exciting topics just like that.

the first diagnosis begins. or the exclusion of arrhythmia in a patient, advice and recommendations from experienced professionals, and an apple can rightly be called a product that protects against cancer, and in this sense, apples have a lot of anticarcinogenic properties. these are antioxidants. and the same pectin. watch in the health program on the tv channel belarus 24th tone of the country people's artist of the republic of belarus vladimir gromov hello and right away i want to start with the voice, the baritone is the middle voice between a tenor and bass. but you, for example, uh, could hit some tenor notes. here you need to understand, that is, in principle, this is the bass sound row,

let's say, here, uh. the baritone segment is a little higher, but we also have an uh, a certain uh range in which we intersect with the tenor, and even higher. that is, this does not mean that one sings here, then on the next floor there is a baritone and on the third floor there is no longer a tenor. we have when we sing in one of these territory, uh and one and the second and the third just for someone is a note in the middle of the range. for some, it is at the bottom of the one-story note. and for some, this is the top, that is. well, in principle, a baritone, if you look at it. hmm, it's different from the tender. well, roughly speaking, the bass is a third a fourth down, well, 3 4 notes down, and the tenner is 3-4 notes up higher. well, in fact, the coloring of the voice is also so thick, timbral, some kind of santa claus like this, you know cedar here.