hello welcome to the guests of our today's program, of course, greetings to all. who is watching us now, let's start with a landmark event. this is, of course, the samarkand shanghai cooperation organization summit

of 15 leaders of representatives of major international organizations. significant ones for us gathered there, because, in general, the procedure for joining belarus to this large-scale organization, which is significant for the world, has officially begun. why because right away? well, almost all the leaders of the participants in this themselves indicated this, that from the category a regional player is moving into the category of global players of the shanghai cooperation organization, and this is what is important to note not only the participants, not only members of this organization, but those who are watching this process from the west, let's hear it, france says the countries that are represented in the shanghai cooperation organization make up half of the world's population in some way. this can be called a countersummit. if you look at what he writes the american press, if it serves what the american political establishment says, then it all boils down to one

conclusion: the sco, led by russia, china is forming a new world order. or konstantin you agree with that. and if you look at the map, indeed, it now occupies half of the globe. this is such a specific pan-asian cooperation organization, and even if it were not worth creating, because there were such cooperation organizations in america in europe, yes. and here is asia uh, such organizations, well up so far there has been no, well, only one agreement, and today we see that all the prerequisites are valid for its growth for its such rebirth. there is a player, firstly, it enters as a full member in full, the european state of the republic of belarus , and as an observer in terms of quality, this is turkey, which is an asian state, but with a piece yes of european territory, which egypt also has. well, almost everything is africa except for the sinai peninsula. that is, we see that those who are really interested

states that want to develop, that want to live on, it is development. does it go to the formation of a new world order, what is the back of the west afraid of, while we see the prerequisites for how it will go further. and what will happen to those world orders, how it will develop, fall apart there, crack at the seams , everything will leave its mark sergeevich that here is shanghai with sewerage in cooperation is an application for what is now the world will work according to the new rules, if, of course, this trend continues. already these rules are being formed, the world is working in a new way, because the old rules do not suit the majority of the world's population 80% of the world's population did not support sanctions against russia and belarus. and by the way, those countries that are members of the sco are just the basis of the foundation. this is the number of people who will never support these sanctions, that they are satisfied with those countries that are included in the sh- what does not suit

this organization and those who brings them together. it diktat by the united states of america from diktat. from the anglo-saxons. it is impossible to develop your country. without imposing any dogmas that were imposed, for example, by the united states around the world. this does not suit them with one of the sco principles that suits absolutely everyone. this recognition of the diversity of countries, the diversity of the foundations of historical traditions, is based on this without a change of regimes. excuse me something for cooperation, when you cooperate with the usa change all the time, nobody needs the second moment, which is already has already happened, the world economy is changing and will change very much. it is happening before our eyes. this is a gas oil conflict is a lack of resources. we are well aware that the struggle for resources will continue throughout. for the entire existence of mankind, europe

is now faced with a shortage of gas oil. and this is only just the beginning. well, to sum it up very briefly and understandably, the us hegemony is over. it doesn't end. she 's over. let there be a struggle for the sphere of influence, but no one will tolerate them anymore like before, not india not china, no one says that this will happen quickly. this is a very difficult process. remember, when erdogan arrived, he was photographed. there were such arguments that erdogan is doing there, and so the president of turkey answered very clearly. he said that turkey's goal is membership in and here it would seem, well, the obvious things need to be nod, but, for example, scholz - said that he was annoyed about turkey's intention to join the shanghai cooperation organization andrey evgenievich what kind of non-diplomatic decisions are these from someone germany and i think that all these displeasures and emotions from germany of individual countries of the

european usa and canada are now of little concern to anyone, at least from the players entering or aspiring in shos. for me. the main thing that happened at this summit in samarkand was that, from, let's say, economic interaction of a purely economic calm and balanced, when both china and russia and india, pakistan believed that they had a large margin of time in order to rebuild the world, there is no more time than this and they simply switched to a forced one. uh, the eurasian big development scenario. integration and the creation of its own economic basis of the political basis and, uh, the military basis, why am i talking about the military and the security sphere, because the sco was actually created initially to solve the legacy of colonial british india, the solution of the indo-pakistani project in the first place, then it was added

thanks to china infrastructural development, there are roads, power lines, nuclear power plants or large thermal power plants, then a humanitarian dimension was added there. here is this big uh, digital sco university and so on. so on, not only economic history, but national security national security in all its manifestations from food security. and here is technological security, that is, new technologies that yes are now concentrated in china well, in russia, including before, military security. breaks down the myth of opportunity isolation of belarus and russia in the world. just looking at this summit, looking at the number of leaders, the number of countries that participate themselves and agree, it is clear that isolation is ridiculous, the construction of the wall by our neighbors , lithuanian poles, looks especially ridiculous against the backdrop of what is happening in the world. that is, they look so dwarfed and miserable

against the background of world processes that this is already clear to everyone. what insulation could be the last rubicon which is in my opinion. uh, will be passed by the shanghai cooperation organization in the near future or medium term. this, of course. uh, so giving up the dollar monopoly. now, if the financial markets this is the last superstructure that does not yet have a large eurasia if there will be some kind of digital exchange transfer common eurasian currency, and we are already talking about this. that's when the american or uh, british-american or and the transatlantic monopoly will be put an end to join me, first of all, i see this as a kind of registration of the union of former colonial and dependent countries, as they used to say against their former colonialists, in general, these are not former colonialists, not colonism. it never

stopped, and when the socialist system collapsed and the soviet union collapsed, there was an attempt to extend colonial influence to this part of the world, one sixth of the world to the former soviet republics and, in general, the essence of this system. well, not an equivalent exchange. this is not only pumping out resources, but also pumping out human capital in order to conserve entire continents and countries left in order to pump out of them everything that is possible, and in exchange, supplying harmful production. vital activity and so on, and it is clear that when, in general, russia realized its position, that it plunges into the abyss of nicholas of colonism. she also, in general, uh, decided that it was necessary to raise all all the countries that used to be part of the soviet union and her system, and therefore i think that the sco is

the formation of the union of former colonial dependent countries against the colonialists. and this is the system. eh, its power will grow. why does she become global, because i think after the asian countries. we see the desire of the middle east countries of south latin america and african countries. i think that this is a kind of banner that will end it , not the us has been talking a lot about the fact that international law has collapsed. it's true, it doesn't exist. so now there is a struggle for the formation of new international law, and belarus, by the way, is an active participant in this struggle. and until we build together with countries that, including russia’s senior ally, the rules that we set up once and for all. we will not stop this fight either. we don't have to be fluffy bunnies either. here we are ladies, peaceful ladies , tolerant, but now there is a struggle, and in this struggle we will participate very actively,

for which we are claiming territory. we claim for fair rules of the international game what russia is now doing in ukraine by conducting a special operation. this is a struggle not only for peace in ukraine, not only for the right of the ukrainian people to self-determination and escape from dependence, when they were mocked for so many years the west, and the struggle for new world rules, so that these rules suit us. more. we will not tolerate dictatorship. this applies not only. and all immediately further just look how organic this impulse rusik turned out to be, joining the shanghai cooperation organization, i illustrate how tightly and how organically belarus and our delegation looked on the sidelines of the summit a huge number of negotiations. like these, well, what can be called spontaneous. although at this level, nothing spontaneous happens. but those no less on its feet on the sidelines, that is, every minute is used to

use this moment for the benefit of bilateral relations. and, of course, yevgenievich’s landmark moment is, of course, the minsk talks in beijing. on september 16, the most important document was published, a joint declaration on the establishment of an all-weather and comprehensive strategic partnership. 19 points aimed at deepening relations in almost all areas in china. this document caused mass approval, but they call it interesting internet user. this is even the wording round-the-clock online relations of iron friends. so this is the all-weather formation. she's not new. now we have already heard, but nevertheless, when it is included in the heading of diplomatic documents. this is such a signal, i don’t know, for the whole world that big china will show. this is our partner and we should treat him appropriately. i would like to note here that all the countries with which, uh, belarus works in the sco format. we began to build such

relations and progressively consistently with the entire presidential policy of the policy of our foreign ministry to lead to this for two decades. there are no random partners with whom we met in the fields, we ourselves shook hands. we were photographed somehow now fashionably in the media tradition and declared that we are friends, partners do not spill, all these relations are built, and they are economic political and from the point of view of security beneficial to belarus and they have a success story from china and india from pakistan and with the countries of africa and even with turkey who now, yes, agrees is trying to play on two chess boards in europe and asia from the united states from china but the question is uh, because that's what, uh, belarus, pursuing such a consistent policy, has become consistent and predictable partner for all members. that is, china knows what to

expect from us. i love examples. and uh, there is the concept of foreign policy. here is the belarusian foreign policy and for example, i always like to compare lately with politics external lithuania difference. what will we leave behind? actually national interests? remember , we were all criticized by the multi-vector policy. this is something wrong. here is the sco and belarus obtaining the status of a permanent member of the sco. this is the result of a thirty-year multi-vector policy. it was never directed against someone solely in our national interests and look when we saw that the smell led the relationship to sanctions. when we already knew this before, what it will be, what it is, perhaps, we instantly corrected throwing his policy vector to those countries. and if we only did this today, here is what i said. my colleague, what happened, and lithuania. that's why, for example, he cited, lithuania is pursuing a policy against its people. it is in their interests to be friends with belarus and russia , which means it is beneficial to be friends with china, and they

work for a foreign country. here for people to make it clear, when the country of its leadership is dependent on the united states or scrap. yes, from anyone about this, the president, on september 17, very well said there will be a collapse of foreign policy. and we will leave ours here and everything catches emphasize that in all contacts belarus acts as an equal partner. we have not only established relations with the leading countries of the world for 30 years, but we ourselves have been developing these 30 years. we have not lost the technological cultural educational heritage of the soviet union as a result. we are an equal and interesting partner for such states as the people's republic of china, the republic of pakistan, india the thing is that for a long time, belarus supplied the people's republic of china with advanced in the military-technical sphere, let's remember, uh, chinese gratitude when they created strategic mobile missile systems

on wheeled chassis and tractors, which are based on the products of the minsk wheel plant for tractors. china thanked us for this, because thanks to this they have equalized their missile potential practically with the leading countries of the world. there is still a lot to be said about our various achievements. we are interesting to the whole world it is interesting as a technological house. the thing is that we have a lot of students from chinese people's republic and from india from other countries, that is, our country, thanks to its internal labor and tension, into what we have not squandered. the legacy that the soviet union left us has not been abandoned from the soviet period. we are close chinese and understood. in china, belarus does not really respect those who spit on their past. belarus is a respected state precisely because it remembers its past, it is not ivans of kinship who do not remember, but develops what was given to us further, move on, important. subject

parallel to this ourselves there we see how they set fire to the perimeter at the point this is, of course , armenia azerbaijan is, of course, tajikistan and kyrgyzstan, we saw that in the fields the two leaders tried to pacify this situation. but now, this morning, we have already seen that there is a process of mutual reproaches. this, of course, serbia kosovo is, of course , what is now brewing in moldova yulia konstantinovna here. this is what this is a favorite western tactic of controlled chaos, uh, this is an attempt to additional pressure on russia to distract her from the events in ukraine, how do you do that see? if you continue what you said war to ukraine, a new aggravation of conflicts in syria and incomprehensible situations during the elections, especially what has happened in sweden now and a lot of other events from the smoldering conflicts that we see around the world. this is not some kind of malicious intent, this is not an accident, we have simply entered a new phase in the development of

international relations, which is tougher, more intense and more bloody. as a matter of fact , speaking about this, the president spoke about this in a conversation with him in alfovich, i agree, but uh, i want to add that yes, there really are internal the reasons for all the conflicts that we see in the world today, but they are being artificially ignited now on purpose, and the fact that they have escalated right now is the moment when the confrontation between the west and russia is especially acute. it is not an accident if you take central asia, it is not a secret. uh, the west has long dreamed of setting fire to central asia under the belly of russia so that it blazes. we remember the events in kazakhstan very well, we remember very well who was behind these events. we remember very well who stood behind all the national conflicts in the former soviet republics. yes conflict there is, but as the beckoning of a wand and magic , us advisers appear who come, ostensibly to resolve this conflict and a fatal accident. this conflict flares up even more strongly, if we take serbia, kosovo, then

here it is obvious an attempt to set fire to europe again in order to weaken it, as soon as europe when this happens, as soon as timid voices are heard in europe about being against europe against, in order to be sovereign independent, so that somewhere to move away from the dictates of the united states of america, they are thrown a new conflict in order to somehow resolve it ourselves later, and the weakening is an attempt by russia. this is also the weakening of europe, in the end we see just a desire not to compete honestly, but to unleash a war and watch it from the ocean and the last. the only thing the americans miscalculate, if suddenly, god forbid, god forbid, the third world war erupts, sit out across the ocean, as usual. let's remember with yulia konstantinovna yesterday's meeting between alexander lukashenko and the secretary of state. this is the safety of alexander alfovich. really. there alarming times sounded on steel talking about information security assumptions

at the borders and much more that did not become permanent to the general public. well , the scope is clear. well, let's listen to this fragment. you must report briefly to me on the situation on the southern borders. i destroyed the ministry of defense for you to all law enforcement agencies, taking into account our experience since the start of russia's special military operation in ukraine, and to work out our actions on the border with ukraine on sensors, we had experience of counteraction there, certain, including the creation of battalion tactical groups, cover, borders, there were up to 13 of these groups. and what is the situation now and how will we continue to act there, and how will we cover the northwestern border, where there are real threats, this is a must for our army. the main thing is, again, there is no need to reproach us that we are going to fight there in ukraine and so on, we need to

protect our fatherland and, as for uh, russia’s support once again confirms through belarus no blow in the back to the side with the flank. by russian troops to be should not and not putin in this, uh, our obligations to our ally, the president absolutely soberly absolutely logically reacts to all those events that occur around the perimeter of belarus, alexander grigoryevich repeatedly publicly and directly stated that, well, it’s impossible. uh, it means that it is impossible to continue the previous policy, let's say we agree with certain provisions of the concept of national security or military doctrine, which we called the doctrine of peace. why because there are even conditional opponents? no, there are allies and partners, and against whom we should defend against whom it was not even indicated, but returning to what oleg

sergeevich said, i still would not agree. in the sense that it is only against russia that all the latest conflicts that have erupted have erupted in the key logistical and political corridors of this shanghai organization of labor. what is kyrgyzstan and tajikistan is just a direct part of the direct road of the new shanghai, whale, of course, the silk road. what is the visit of nancy pelosi, uh, to armenia, uh. i was in armenia many times filmed, by the way, uh the very events that led to power. uh, no pashinyan, so here are the armenians themselves and armenian political scientists. experts said that, unfortunately, a lot of things in armenian politics are based on three, and it’s surprising what three are. the american armenian association, that is, the huge armenian lobby that lives in the united states, which has financial resources, but which is amenable to the colossal influence of the united

the states of america form a significant part of the policy play on the weakness of the dkb, allegedly. yes, here see the speaker of the parliament, armenia armen simonyan called the csto a pistol that does not shoot even a pilos. arriving there, it presses this boolean point. well, interesting, but belarus organized uh. this is the minsk negotiating group for the resolution of the karabakh issue. how long has she been there for two decades ? yes, all russia belarus usa france were involved uh, just the territorial problem between armenia and azerbaijan is so deep that they can be solved in a simple format especially if there is no desire, but there is still between nato and ldpkb. look who's talking. let them tell, show at least one example of how nato resolved some kind of conflict, except for blood, and then that this conflict has been going on for 100 years. it was not in iraq that they decided to show it in afghanistan, they decided so, no matter how he wants to decide, he just doesn’t want a war. look here

. she sang to herself she said everything in armenia. rather, after visiting, i wrote in my social networks today from the usa to ukraine, taiwan and armenia, the world faces a choice between democracy and autocracy, and we must again choose democracy. terrible phrase in lies in every word. you see, all the wars. they always started under the guise of democracy. it's just the same we are fighting for democracy for freedom from your dictates. why does democracy in their understanding do this? how they say to trade with those, how they talk to whom, prices should be as they say, which means politicians in power should be as they say, and that's it. it came out beautifully. you are against the united states, all this is not democracy for the united states. and let us recall other examples when the modes, where they cut off their democratic heads, because the united states is good for what you started today about this, it has been redone. eh, world, but look at what she says now and

in parallel. what statements are heard here scholz said that he believes that germany is ripe for becoming a full member of the security council, he is not a symbol of destruction, that is, germany on sunday. 7 million soviet soldiers and their descendants for a start, he started with what it was the device of the world after world war ii war, in which germany, in particular, the fascist nazi regime is responsible only on our former soviet territory for 27 million lives, let them resurrect 27 million, and then enter. why does he do the same, he does not understand this. revenge. revenge. this is revenge. the whole point is that there was a long work to beat hitler. we remember that we will allow the denocification of germany, uh, it was completely superficial the number of members by 12.p. one million went through the deficit and eight

million nazis remained built into the system. they became prosecutors, judges, led the police and, most importantly, intelligence and the army. that is, all these long post-war years. this abscess is ripe there. and these people have not forgotten, they have not forgiven. to the soviet union and the anti-hitler victory coalition, therefore , now that they have felt that there is an opportunity, they mistakenly believe that the russian federation is not the equivalent of the soviet union, that it cannot mobilize anti-fascist forces. and now we see just the situation when fascism is raising its head, anti-fascist forces should also come together to provide opposition, but they want to show on international law that there has been a paradigm shift, a paradigm shift, that the yalta peace no longer works, that the countries that have been defeated. they must now take their place among the leading powers of the world. and vice versa, those who

defeated fascism. they should be pushed back to the rear because the chancellor's statement, the less authoritative schultz, is no longer an authoritative leader. it's hard to imagine germany now in europe losing its credibility every day. poland already declares itself on a par with germany against the background of the poorest population of germany against the background of economic problems against the background of germany's inability to solve any european conflict. the germans decide everything for them. they see it directly, you have to make a statement about the un about greater germany or something else, in order not only to distract your population to show that you can at least do something, so he makes some kind of statement. i would take salt and deal with the issue of ukraine i would stop the supply of weapons, improve relations with moscow already moscow is not talking about the ambulance don't talk. putin is the authority, and this is the statement today that germany

should be in the security council. oh, and the fact that he is discredited. let's remember over these 10-15-20 years that it did not solve a single conflict , did not condemn either ira or lily or the revolution did not stop anything, therefore aleksey rovno did as much as he could, for example. decided food security in the world, that is, unesco worked, other systems worked, returning to your thesis that the former colonial countries no longer want. uh, obey their colonists. so here it is, if u reform. and by the way, belarus has said this at many diplomatic political platforms, then india pakistan egypt brazil argentina should be in the security council, those countries that have a sovereign position. turkey is no longer he is gone, he saw it, in which we are now seeing it, it can be updated, it is the only thing that the united states of america and its satellites in the european union are doing everything possible to

prevent this, but i agree with oleg, sergeyevich when i see, and open russophobia belarusianophobia, when i see the closed sky over belarus, when i see how olympians are not allowed in, hiding behind incomprehensible political slogans, when i see that the other day, look in geneva in early september, a meeting of states was held. from the participants of the convention on the prohibition of biological and toxic weapons. there, representatives of the united states admitted that on the territory of ukraine they conducted biological research on poor ukrainians and hmm, that means those who were treated for mental psychiatric hospitals. they admitted it and someone over there told them. what are you doing, no one, and for this reason. i support. i remembered the paralympic belarusian russian olympians, where he is the people who have lived all their lives preparing for this, where he does not have this. well, here the question is no longer about rhetoric. that is, we condemn. this american city on a hill can be done for as long as we like , what should we do? here is the sco, uh, to do

direct economic, and relations with the countries of greater eurasia have their own currency. if reforming he's good, but not your way rules, but according to those rules that are interesting to the whole world, do not accept their rules anymore. ours but look oleg sergeevich and serbia this weekend we observed that this is it we have already discussed that another point is set on fire, and we saw two forces that collided on the same side. i am gay parade supporters. although it is clear that the gay parade is also that screen, these are the symbols of the banner, but on the other hand. uh, procession and other power. and here, look what we see on one side of the gay parade and besides the rainbow flags. we'll see there are flags of ukraine and in the crowd of the ambassador of the united states of america and on the other hand the procession and tricolors in this crowd. isn't this the conceptual watershed that is around, which now all this

global confrontation is taking place, but this paphos is now very missionary. this is a clash of two civilizations, one civilization rots and destroys itself, and the second civilization fights for good against evil, and we saw this in serbia, of course, we are right. bt is just a pretext screen. this is a symbol of terry such western liberalism. we again slandered liberalism, it is good, but in the west they turned it. here in this terry liberalism, dictatorial liberalism. anti-democratic liberalism. they take away freedom from people here, because they impose all this on people and forbid it to disapprove of some kind of freedom, and there we saw people who want to preserve their history, their values, in the end their faith and that’s it. we saw this. by the way , september 17 passed on the territory of belarus. i am colonization. this is what it says from the outside. the fact is that behind all

these. eh, let's say promotion. the same kind of freedom of sexual and other choices. they are trying to move us away from all the global problems that we really need to solve. this is hunger, this is warriors, this is impoverishment. this is capital flight. it is not clear where this money is going and how it is going. these are ours. we the republic of belarus, having adopted a new constitution, clearly outlined for ourselves what kind of how we will build our state? what does our family represent, what are our guidelines, and uh, but they are trying to obscure us all the time with this picture, you understand a screen so that we forget, so that people forget about what is for us. no, we have chosen our own path, but look how many people who still cost this screen, forget nothing. there is an institution here with you absolutely agree this is a necessary but not sufficient step, as in mathematics. remember , it is necessary and a sufficient solution is necessary, because fixation was needed, including legal, our traditional and family

values ​​are not enough, because again you are absolutely right. uh, medina processing and of our society, both russian and serbian unfortunately, it comes with an accrual result. i would like to announce here. i will take this opportunity on friday in belarus in minsk to host a big event. orthodox forum of families, where this will be discussed. i hope that the participants of this forum in minsk , in our beautiful capital, will find a solution , offer initiatives for a solution in order to keep ours. but, if you like, reasonable orthodox uh, conservatism. i want to say that we are probably mistakenly separating different hypostases of that hybrid war from each other, which is now taking place both informationally and economically, and the hot war that is going on in ukraine, these are all elements of the same hybrid war, and to say which of these

elements is important, the president said that now the main blow must be made on information incarnations of this war, because here in many ways we are losing. it's just cutting edge. yes, this is just the cutting edge and not always. we are ready for the attacks that the prepared one makes. uh, learned an adversary who expend colossal technical financial resources. and, of course, this is an economic economic war, these sanctions. after all, this is also the part what is happening in europe that's the weekend in paris people take to the streets, if at first, for example, last weekend there did not come out against rising prices. we saw how the police act in paris this weekend, when they went out there, what we already saw there, we must leave the eu, we must leave nato with the macron , and this will continue. what's in italy in genoa happened? here are the shots now on our screens, by the way, there will be interesting resistance shots. this poster is a reference to

golev's france, beautiful and a husband. why is macron scholz so stubbornly stubborn, they go not in the name of the people themselves, but contrary to the desire, expectations and demands of their own people in their own state. well, everything, the fact is that, in my opinion, this is the essence of the political systems there, where in fact the people do not elect their leadership, but it is precisely those people who have the greatest influence on the elections. states that are economic masters in a given state and at the expense of their resources. they can buy, they can buy , and the elections can buy, and the presidents can be here the old elites and the financial circles of germany france, which, unfortunately, after the collapse of the ussr , are completely under the dependence of their bought. america has not left. after the

essay fell apart we left. it was the ussr russia left europe america remained redeemed all these leads if the elites are different, if you figure out who owns the french german factories factories, we will be surprised, and in what sovereignty? in general, they tell us, because the most important thing is a sign of sovereignty. ownership, if you don't have land, if you don't have factories, if you don't have a territory that belongs to everything, it's sold to ukraine. the war is going on, and they sell something every month. what is the process of referendums, yes, which were announced in the near future, there from september 23 to september 27 today there was news that russia announced a partial mobilization, that is, this suggests that the realization is coming that in this old paradigm of perception and attitude to what is happening, there will be no change, and what is happening now in russia, uh, a referendum. let me be so

frank. maybe no one who is not tolerant can like war. and the fact that people are dying, but we must clearly understand that russia has no right to lose, no right to surrender and no right to give in. this is a security issue, not only with russia itself, this is a security issue, not only with belarus. her direct ally, who never betrayed the president’s words about not being stabbed in the back, is it is very important that all of russia is watching this, and all of europe, the whole world. they know that belarus is the brest fortress, but this is also the security of europe, the security of germany, france, and, as it were, the lithuanians nikichili. there is security and theirs because the sooner russia finishes this, the sooner you can understand this well. you are absolutely right. i support it completely, but they don't hear it. they live in this cocoon. completely different reality of their propaganda works. we continue with another topic

that cannot be bypassed today partially on today it has already been said that belarus widely celebrated the day of national unity. you know , it’s even surprising somewhere, because a very young holiday usually takes decades for it to enter like that. e, settled in the people's consciousness, and here instantly, and of course, today we will touch upon this landmark performance in the minsk arena. on saturday, very important messages were heard there. we really need to understand them. but you know what gets noticed. this parallel tension in poland we see how writes. and what the local press writes is indignant that the belarusians got into this topic, that we have no right to do so. and so to behave so to speak, and our oppositional press. and why did you decide to go to another country, they really didn’t like that in the school curriculum on the history of belarus well, we began to talk more about the polish occupation until the thirty-ninth year andrei evgenievich what bothered them so much? well, what strains poland and

those who serve the interests of poland from our former e, now fugitives. uh, citizens of compatriots is what we reminisce real story. after all, we didn’t come up with anything there, they are losing their monopoly on history on our belarusian history several times already cited this example. take a fresh polish film eagles, where in the thirty-ninth year there is not a single belarusian in grodno, this is a modern film. that is, they see our past in this way, so i say that the past is not about yesterday. it's about tomorrow. if we refuse very clearly consistently, truthfully, which, by the way, the president already told e to tell his story for us, they will others, and they will not only rewrite history for us. they will write the future for us, then in this case they will do it. here's a much more pressing question. yes? well, okay, we talked, they are talking about history books, after all, it is in our hands. well map of the pole. we see that this is widely spoken about in society, primarily, of course, by patriotic forces. ah. we have heard, and most recently at a meeting of the president,

the idea was voiced that this is probably how these people should be determined. they are citizens of belarus or they have a different civic orientation. and here's what's wrong with a map of the field, like speech itself. the whole point is that by issuing a map of the poles, poland multiplied the ranks with agents of its influence is another question. did this intention succeed, many people, for mercantile reasons for humanitarian reasons, acquired this card, but the idea, and poland was here to multiply the ranks of agents of influence on people, was counting on that in the event of some kind of emergency inside the country. well, let's say that the fifth column will raise its head the fifth column and the president did not say without reason when, after the elections, what an outrageous polish flags in grodno, these maneuvers, when half of the belarusian army was. it is on alert and advanced to the western regions of our country. what is this? it is first and foremost an attempt. uh, an attempt to stop these

moods here and in addition, a warning to those. on the suck with our neighbors who think of themselves as the masters of western belarus, because these sentiments have not died. this is part of the polish self-consciousness, the return of the original chair is part of the polish self-consciousness. this is not only in the general software line of the piz party that is now in power, but it is also a broad opinion the polish elite, as you can see at the same time, is saying that one of the scenarios was the capture of a single several district center region of a specific issue. not how to relate to what interests more is the right of poland and we have such interests. here is a specific example of a field map, how to say it? so here i am a deputy. we must legally deal with the pole's card and do not be offended by someone that offends someone. this is our national interest question

. what are the political ones? we know such a state of moldova, some of the citizens live in them in romania and the president with a passport votes. yes, this is a good example, when a politician is elected there who will defend moldovan interests. yes, never, if this issue continues, we will never allow this, so we will legislatively ask the citizens a question. are you belarusian or not? and the one who received the pole’s card should understand that he shows loyalty to the polish state. the card was issued by polyakov sergeevich and a citizen of belarus is not necessary, otherwise we will get here, of course, there will be no national question must. in our country, thank god, belarusian poles are trying to come up with a national question more in such fields. the poles live well in our country and will live by the polish card. they are trying to make some kind of formation over all the people, artificially. absolutely right. we have

a civil state, that is, we have citizens. there, the republic of belarus can be the one who took citizenship, we do not have any national preferences there. we all live in the world, they beat people for the russian belarusian speech in belarus, this is possible submit any nationality, get down, live flesh taxes and will live by some classes, september 17th. i can't resist. here are our opponents. this is the answer to the surface. they work only in the interests of poland, they came up with such a thesis disputed date. that's how the date can be controversial when here we were on february 17 at the arena city. well, you look at the map until september 17th. here, belarus and here the belarusians live. and if we didn’t enter the soviet army , the germans would have a controversial date, here’s the thesis a controversial date, because lying in open. it's hard to say a bad date can not return i'll explain why, because we've been saving for a long time. here is the spirit of a good neighborhood. we turned a blind eye to this phenomenon. it is clear that the relevant

services worked there and paid attention to some subversive activities. but at the moment, a lot of people who have this pole's card, these are citizens of belarus . as you rightly said, they received from some such number of contille point of view, definitely not in order to harm the belarusian state, but on the other hand, the context has absolutely changed at the moment, not poland nor the polish people, fortunately it is the polish regime, which took control of the polish people. this is an extremely hostile force for us. and, accordingly, everything connected with this extremely hostile force is perceived as a threat to the belarusian state. in this regard, a very difficult question that needs to be approached, well, very carefully and at the same time decisively. what to do with the map belarus has already begun to approach. look here for the question we are also very much and often criticized, including in poland when belarus led lithuanians and latvians without visas for poles, but one of the motives. what used to rest more, issuing a pole card. this means that

belarusian poles and polish poles will be more often. and to meet to exchange in belarus goes ahead in front more says, please, who lives in poland permanently. and who just goes there for pants? these are two different categories according to the cards of the pole, and all this must be legally dismantled, and the second point you are right. time has completely changed right. belarusians must clearly understand that it is impossible to wake up, as before, that terrorist groups are now preparing on the territory of poland and do not hide from this in order to enter by armed means. and what can't they then use those who have a pole's card? well, well, in some fantasy world we live, there are special services, there are national interests. and if the belarusian understands this, and the majority understands this. i think all this can be done again, i want to state that we are by no means talking about the fact that we have some there braids look at people. there, with a polish origin, in no case is it

to take what is consciously about. at one time, the pole was conceived, as a political instrument, a lever of pressure, and now it is quite possible that they will actively use it, it’s all about it. the fact is that we underestimate the general mood that prevails in the polish city. many of them believe that that the belarusian state is a misunderstanding, that the belarusian state is not a real state. they refer to the era of the commonwealth when e byelorussians were poderёmnym people not without reason. the president says that we stood on our knees, because here the question is still the survival of the belarusian nation of belarusians. they wanted to polish the belarusians. they wanted to be wiped off the face of the earth. see, e. bialystok voivodeship, when stalin gave the bialystok voivodeship to poland, how many belarusians were there more than 200,000? and how much less than 15 is now the question

means, where have these people gone, this can be said about the nazis, because the targeted policy of the destruction of the belarusian ethnic group is not in the physical culturally in terms of education. in general. this policy also extends to our territory, if they want to seize half of our territory, this one only in order to turn this entire territory into a mono-ethnic state into a polish state. let's recall the president's speech on saturday, which is in tune with what we are discussing now. let's see. yesterday i had an interesting conversation with the president of kazakhstan, he is a former diplomat. a very smart person. i always appreciate his advice and even support. and he came up to me a lot now talking about the sovereignty of independence, who is right? who's guilty? whoever attacks whom, he defends his interests very much. he came up to me and said alexander you

know, i remember one of your performances. sorry for the indiscretion, very wise. i say, what is the wisdom? what kind of thesis i put forward there. he says you said it very simply. they got to arguing, where is ukraine, where is russia, you belarus had such states as belarus does not exist, and then he says you said such a phrase. well, well, well, there was no belarus at some time, but now it exists and this must be reckoned with. what happened on the territory of the usa 300 years ago we put figma there. sorry, the indians walked the prairies, but there was no such state, but now it is the number one state in the world so far. so europe was completely different. that's all. that is, this is an absolutely correct thesis of the president, and it shows what we are all fighting for. we are all fighting for a dry, but independent, belarus and we will fight and

it will be an expression of lukashenka yes, he said that our putin can be considered nationalists in in the sense that we are fighting for the interests of our states. after all, there can be no belarusian patriot, let's say. so nationality is not pro-polish, not about ukrainian or about russian. it can be, only about the belarusian, maybe only about the belarusian around this, everyone should unite this thesis. this is the thought that just sounded, i wanted to turn to it. why because it is not only such a statement, you know, the existing current sovereignty. this is by and large, and we spent the entire today's program around this. this is a challenge to us for those who live. now in the current generation of belarusians, in order to preserve this sovereignty, which is already a lot, but the maximum task is to increase both the economic and spiritual wealth of the belarusian people. that is, so that we conditionally, when paleontologists will then disassemble the layers for you and see who lived here, we did not

understand this trace, but these existed for a reason, not a smell. they brought something to this land in this context at this time, therefore , this village. it seems to me that it is extremely important for us to somehow absorb or konstantin what do you think, we are now , and we are no longer talking, and yet a hybrid war and all these tools that are being used against us. these are its elements. we must act. as a matter of fact, in the war. we must defend ourselves to defend our sovereignty. we really got it back. you really are the state that deserves to live the way it wants. we deserve it and we are doing everything for this, and therefore today we really need to decide where we are. we are here with our state. or we we consider ourselves immediately to introduce a citizen of the world, a citizen of citizens, events are good, but in our time we must very clearly understand and choose our position, when they say i had no choice wrong, however, there is always a choice and what we do - this is our choice. and we must take responsibility for sovereignty - this is

capable of doing what the people and the state want, but no one says. here is an example, we will decide for ourselves with whom to be in the union. we have decided that our people are in alliance with russia or , for example, are now in the sco. we do it second the moment is to fight only for our own land. nobody will throw us into the fire of war without our desire, this is a souvenir, unfortunately, you won’t ask the lithuanians, you won’t ask the poles, the ukrainians, who, unfortunately, lost their sovereignty, didn’t ask. that's what we're fighting for. the right to be ourselves. oh, and decide your own fate. this is the most important thing to decide your own fate. well , sovereignty, i think, is also following one's own national interests. and in general, we feel our national interests, despite the fact that we respect other people's national interests, but still the

interests of our state. interestingly, ours should be the goal of the country's leadership and the goal of our people for me, i immediately recall in this sense, uh, the big open lesson of the president on september 1, when you remember he turned to young people here are our older generations. i, including as president, did everything to ensure that the national first belarusian sovereign state took place. and now the question of the young more than a generation to you. you can develop it, improve it and save it in history. this question number one in terms of sovereignty. thank you very much for participating in today's conversation. i think that there is something to think about after our program ends. thank you thank you for participating our viewers for today everything is happy. to be

honest, hand on heart, if i didn't want to. if you give it to me, i'll kill you, i decided to issue a power of attorney for you, but for a while the company's management has a guest house. you can settle down and live there. well , i think we'll agree. this is who is paid, watch the series grapes

on tv channel belarus 24 removed from the city mitusni here is your edge and your strength. true pirate cop. forgive yourself. tumble down and tear off a special one. she got wet, tell me the elements. skin circle and one not with nature wild watchful yelnya

belarus belarusians carry lighted lamps, flowers and soft toys everywhere to the embassy of the russian federation in minsk, together with the russians mourn the memory of the victims of the tragedy at the school of izhevsk, the memory of the dead almost or representatives of the belarusian union of journalists words of solidarity with russian mothers . came to express the participants of the belarusian union of women, of course, could not remain without private to this tragedy. and everyone who came here today and come. it’s really people who call their hearts, because, well, there are no other people’s children, there are no other people’s tragedies, first of all, of course, we are brotherly peoples, but not only this unites and brings us closer, because when it comes to life and death, when

you send their children to your loved ones. uh, in the morning for work or school, you always hope that they are healthy strong strong will return everything back and it’s very scary, when this does not happen, therefore, and therefore they come here today in order to once again emphasize the value of peace, the value, peace, the value of the stability in which we live. of course, as a mother, as a woman as a member of the belarusian women in the end. in general , i considered it my duty today to come to the russian embassy in order to express condolences and support from the entire russian federation, of course, to the relatives of those people who died in this cruel tragedy. i want to say take care of the children. my condolences, what do you have to say to hold on, but we are belarusians next to the entire russian federation cuba is interested in building up economic cooperation with belarus today in minsk, a business forum was held among invited representatives of the business circles of the two countries,

mutual goods turnover last year amounted to almost $ 23 million in this year, the pace slowed down a bit, but there are reserves for growth. among the priority areas are mechanical engineering and pharmaceuticals. the belarusian chamber of commerce and industry continues to work with the latin american market. we of course consider cuba as ours. e partners in exports to imports operations, as independent countries, but at the same time, cuba is also considered as such an islet is another platform a platform for entering e, the large market of latin america is e, the unicella market, the bolivian market and the market of a number big big countries. which is present in the region, in the region of latin america, corn is being harvested for seed stock, experimental base, krinichnaya, mozyr district, has allocated more than 4,000 hectares of corn fields for seeds situation in