in addition, in the near future it is planned to begin special proceedings against those accused in the case of the so-called coordinating council on the facts of a conspiracy to seize state power, public calls for actions to the detriment of national security and the republic of belarus of the organization and active participation in the activities of extremist groups. the investigators also prepared materials for the start of special proceedings against the heads of the participants of the belarusian sports solidarity fund . who appealed to foreign states and international organizations with calls to boycott a number of sporting events in belarus and not to allow our athletes to participate in competitions . crimes of the persons who committed them are hiding abroad, these crimes, as a

rule, of an extremist orientation with taking into account the category of crimes committed by these persons , it is planned to conduct special proceedings in the near future with the transfer of these criminal cases to the prosecutor for referral to the court. at 19:00 more information see you in the evening edition. my name is igor toure. there my propaganda will start today. however, we will only talk about the main thing, because from the friday meeting of alexander lukashenko with journalists, in principle, it is possible and necessary to talk for a long time and in recent days. i'm sure most of the viewers or something or a lot about that meeting is exactly

the meeting was not about the report, they saw, heard or read, but let's be honest, part of that conversation was not for the general public, there were two reasons for this or for some theses of the head of state, until it was time or well , let's say something from the words of alexander lukashenko was strictly for their journalists of the presidential pool and the stars of state propaganda who joined them. many people asked about the pain personally. for them, the topics were sometimes not only punctures, but in lukashenka's answer, he turned the question around by 80 °. that's what not in any case do it wait. although i'm looking forward to your suggestions. now. actually, even journalists, as well as much earlier with officials. lukashenka is still trying to turn the pyramid of needs of the vertical of power, so that not only alexander grigoryevich tell us how it will be and how to do it. well, so that they would come to the president with

specific proposals, they say, comrade president, but let's do it. so, so the decision is ready, the mechanisms have been worked out, the personnel have been selected, and for this lukashenka will say sincerely thank you. i was also at that conversation they didn’t drink beer honey, although they probably wouldn’t refuse honey in tea, it was still a little bit so cool in the fresh air, but since we’re talking about tea, i ’ll show one fragment of what it seems, if not for public air, but very well emphasizes the very tonality of the meeting nikolain, maybe something worse tea was brought to me, but i’m uncomfortable with one flour, who wants a man to go and take it himself and ask alexander heinrich for a civilian team to bring you tea and for tea journalists in relatively svobodny mode were absent, or gave signals to the servants and cups

with a hot drink from the governor of the minsk region. they showed up right there. here, i want to stop and appeal to all viewers who either attended meetings with the president or perhaps such an honor in the future is out of the question. has it been taken out? those who, on work issues, intersect with the head of state very often, so alexander grigoryevich is absolutely an understanding normal person, and not a bronzed leader. i mean, we often hear questions. how is it you withstood 4 hours of conversation, this is physics on the line exactly anywhere and you can’t go away. people are wrong. it seems that any meeting of any format with the head of state. this is always for a recorded event. but no, i retain respect for the interlocutor, but it must be maintained with any interlocutor. it’s quite possible and more convenient to sit down and comment on something somewhere. and even o lord gently leave. if in the morning i drank a little more tea than i needed, i say this

boldly, because i’m talking about myself on friday got up and quietly walked away for 5 minutes. and no oh, what will happen now? also , lukashenko cannot be again, besides the fact that yes, he is the president, but he is a very understanding person. for which, of course, thanks to him, and on friday alexander grigoryevich very clearly told everyone, both journalists and their viewers, as belarusian state officials. the media will fight in the information field on the screen there should not be open lies. can you show something? how are you doing? artistically non -artistic or something here or you will show, but the basis should be, however, you know, initially it must be true, because if it's fake after a while, it will still become public. here are those who bring these people. let the dead corpses of these people who bring them ask me, and then they are filmed on the phone on the camera, and so on, sooner or later.

they say, they will tell you how it was. let's explain for sure. it is known that among the journalists at the meeting. with lukashenka there were people with different positions on this issue, because information lies can be called disinformation of the enemy. what is very often done, having switched to the british algorithms of military propaganda. ukraine lies - this is bad disinformation of the enemy in the war. it's kind of like even correct supporters of ardent misinformation towards kiev and western decision-making centers. how can i understand? it is possible, but alexander grigoryevich said a stern no, which means no, and the time is now when any decision of the commander-in-chief must be executed without alternatives completely and on time, an example can be taken from china right there, if the head of state or the chairman has already said no the way i participated in my officials. at first he said he set the task and showed it.

time has passed, something has not been done, that go and do it for them. there the chairman is not the president, looked this way and said what will be done, so he is not successful. we do not yet have as in china, but in vain the model of our state. it is such that a fundamental decision that can greatly affect the life of belarusians is made personally by the president, but in this case he needs unquestioning fulfillment of the tasks set. and sometimes i hear something from the authorities there. here you go alexander grigoryevich said. and how can we do it? we can't do that, so we 'll do it differently. you guys are amazing, of course. perhaps this is due to fear that it will not work out, but now is not the time to be afraid, although caution is in our blood - this is a fact belarusians. here they are, wherever something happens from behind the corner, we will look and be afraid so as not to offend someone. well, yes, this is a good

quality, but not for the present, not for this time. if we e start e, wetting must be answered. but what about, finally, after the twentieth year, and you first of all realized that it is necessary to resist, while in any military business, including military information, there is defense, there is a counteroffensive, defeating the enemy and holding positions. and if the weapon is counting down. for each of these phase tanks , bury a tower during defense, the same thing is permissible after defeating the enemy to hold positions. it’s worse, because the offensive arsenal still keeps the civilian population in suspense. why do i need different types of information weapons for different periods of info warfare? here about the lightening on friday, the president said the tank, but maybe you say it raucously, but it's absolute. so i hope grigory yuryevich

will not hold a grudge against me both for this fragment and for my next words, and for the child he did a lot of important and necessary things in this protracted info, but from the president's speech. as you can’t throw words out of a song, it’s harsh, says alexander grigorievich, and here i ’ll show my question and the president’s answer. if turchin does something, not like that, not so quickly, there is not only sometimes discontent. well, that's an insult threats, because only one person can kill turchin, and i have seven of them. i understand them, they throw it i won’t do it. i 'll figure it out, sometimes our uh, people are already, uh, still charged after 2020 in the absence of such a common enemy in the form of black and white. sometimes they jump at each other. yes, and what to do with it? i would really not like there to be such an indulgence for impunity

because of patriotism, in your opinion, what if you knew how many such hurray patriots after the twentieth year were not just punished, but they are in jail. the law in this regard is even tougher, who is closer to the president. and who it would seem that they are their own and are least of all allowed, but igor, the main thing is that we will have to survive this period will go away. this one is just periods, where someone will blame someone, offend someone, insult someone. everything needs to be done on time, one more already, it seems, like the president’s thesis that everyone remembers. is it possible to find everyone outside of belarus or deliver the criminals home? or well, let's say it 's theoretically possible not to deliver, but now why bother with your time, but no one excludes, an adequate response to the white terror, we will answer, the corresponding red terror is also familiar. eh, while there are all we

see conversations, we know this, we know these shelves, uh, get it, although there is no place to sit in kiev somewhere. uh, in cafes they drank tea, and ukrainians well done by the collar to the front, i give everyone definitions based on the answer of the head of state, the regiments are shameful, if these regiments would pose a real threat to belarus, then, yes, then they can be, let's say, forcibly disbanded by any methods, but while the shelves are there it's a blah blah show, then why with an unreasonable attack, we substitute information defense, because our opponents are waiting for where we mess up, in order to instantly throw all our forces and means into this miscalculation and try to put a lot of pressure , as, for example, with the theme of mobilization to them. we need to create a situation. they are trying in every possible way to catch me on something or to catch us together on something and create a situation. and suddenly come back. what if the people rise again, uh, half a million and

the oceans seem, what if they need to cling to something, for now, cling to. no, for what there will be mobilization there will be no mobilization. this is a lie, briefly clear. this is a lie. i just modestly added. just listen to the end, so that if it were my will, i would announce the mobilization, but only so that everyone calmed down under the plinth and just cowards. invented in the head of panic in a hurry, they left us, flew away and ran away. well , good riddance, but it's tough, of course, and once again there will be no mobilization in belarus, because everything that can be mobilized has already been mobilized in belarus, the only question is the effectiveness of the mobilized state propaganda. so in general, as it was mobilized at the end of 2019, we still water it in combat mode, what we talked about with the commander in chief that some get tired and burn out, this happens in war, even for information others sometimes take off their caps and try to put on a crown

along with medal for the information defense of the country. after all, they had heroic victories in 2020, probably something that concerns everyone in general in all areas. victory in the past does not give reason not to win victories today and in the future. does lukashenka follow his infis? oh yes, and even quotes refrains because of their programs. you don’t understand, this is different, alexander grigorievich is especially attentive, of course, he watches television content; this is in our blood. here, no matter how popular the internet is , and some theses from the internal conversation between the president and journalists. here's how i feel about publishing. in the end. we have a program called propaganda, and they just talked about it with the president. the first knife- why is it shown? well, because belarusians , the word of the president means something if there is a meeting on the topic of some kind of it people and

other self-employed. uh, and i'm talking about this topic. it's not just spontaneously from somewhere. so, how will actions be taken in this direction for some people. maybe for the whole society. these questions are very important. and i have nothing to add to this, except perhaps. what is the fact that i am a city to work in the presidential field and not only on business trips abroad with exceptional hospitality, host countries, but also in situations when you need to work in rain and mud, write texts at night or on your knee and try not to think about the absence within a radius of several kilometers, not only of even a crumb of bread, but also of that very tea, and since such a song will show one more fragment of the president’s speech for his journalists, when journalists or politicians and so on sculpt a strong figure out of the president. this means giving a signal to society that there will be a difficult moment. it is necessary to put on it both

trouble and disaster for those heads of state, the president and these other pillars. if in difficult times it will not be possible to put them on. here we roughly blinded the lord god from him saying, and in a difficult moment you can’t rely on him. and this is the key question of why the president's journalists are for him in any situation. yes, we show and show a lot that the head of the belarusian state is a strong personality, but he is one. we're just shaping the truth, nothing more. is it possible to rely on alexander grigoryevich i am not the first in the merchandise today. this is a gift from a good man sergey parkhomenko who is a rapper seryoga cherny boomer kingring, fogs, everything else is here and the logo, agl, and that the most automatic machine with unbent for the time being. if you need shops, i really like it. but the bottom line is that with all due respect to everyone who has contributed to

stabilizing the situation in 2020. do not be a president. don't be like that, don't do it. he does it, but do it, otherwise, if at the peak moment it was impossible to rely on him, then everything, if it had not crumbled like a house of cards, who would certainly have staggered a lot. and this is true, as is the truth, the next one. i am not a god. i'm just a person like you, just put in uh, certain uh, position in a certain situations. and i may be more than you get. well, as one of my uh, former allies of the shoulders said, well, you yourself wanted to be president, so you know, i usually endure a journalist. i do this program, i do reports from working reports and visits of the president, i do other projects, that's not the point. sometimes i hear criticism from my colleagues. journalists cameramen video editing engineers there is not so it should have been here it could

have been better. and here it was necessary, otherwise it's all good, of course. but when i do all this i do, with a small team, all these critics are nowhere to be found. yes, you come at the implementation stage and offer. and let's do it like this, shoot it from this angle, add it to the montage. that would be better, but no, they are all sitting on the priest exactly somewhere far away, there was no assignment, they were not personally assigned a task, it seems that it does not concern any. well, evaluate the result. there is a huge queue of people who want to. now scale it to the president of a large country who also has critics. it's not like that here. well, like this you come at the implementation stage, offer your ideas and your help. if you know what's best. no, such people will sit doing nothing, but wait until someone else does it by order from above, and then they will evaluate the finished result. good or bad. that's honest. enrages questions to the president, such as, what needs to be done to educate

young people as patriots? here's my word of honor, that this also needs to be implemented and controlled by lukashenka alone, that we ourselves have no idea what and how to do. listen, we need to work with young people i need to talk to them, but it's not just me. and here's a small group. eh, you, it is necessary that both in schools and, uh, our saints and creators, finally turn their faces to this. this is a great work that i haven’t read today, but sometimes it doesn’t go very well, i don’t want to stir it up. soul and even the decision on the restoration and reconstruction of the khatyn memorial, in which the president visited, someone could take and without a direct order from lukashenka make a decision to determine the mechanism for the source of funding, select personnel, control and commission alexander grigoryevich, purely theoretically, could

have had nothing to do with this issue at all. everything could have been done without his participation and done well and the right thing would have been done and lukashenka would have been grateful for this. well , the process of redistributing responsibility is not quick, as long as we still have a question, even on trifles, alexander grigoryevich can we do this? the problem is that until alexander grigoryevich says, of course, you can, until an official breaks through with a question to him in his busy schedule, then often the execution up to this one. yes, it’s possible that they don’t start, they don’t begin to be implemented, even the most obvious initiatives are those that lukashenka will definitely support, but until we hear directly from the main one. let's wait. why are we waiting? well , yes, okay, at the end of the president's sense of humor, first, a fragment of a conversation with a colleague erdogan about that very video of chopping wood. and it's kind of like a joke, but there is some

truth in the word, chewing gum, chopping wood. all my phone is doing something in europe is being saved, and now my favorite. brands and how lukashenko knows how to create content out of nothing exodus. i sincerely say that many journalists need to learn this. we have these izars there, as they are called. yes? the first time i've heard. yes , i would very much like to show you the viewer all 2 hours of a conversation with the president. it is very interesting and colossal, and so to say, i took liberties. everything has its time. in the meantime, the final words of alexander grigorievich from the friday meetings. it's kind of like journalists, but in fact, all sovereign people have to go from life, as i always do.