uh-huh well, today, perhaps, he is shaping and pursuing the state agenda, and i would like, probably, to understand, yes, all the responsibility that lies on the shoulders of those who carry an opinion. mm, heads of state, in principle, the state position through their texts, their vlogs, their speeches, and, uh, 90% of what was said during this conversation was clearly not for change for publications, but at the same time, there were obvious accents, including in the work of the media arranged, so i'll ask our directors. uh, now show on the screens a fragment of alexander lukashenko's speech , which, in my opinion, we have not yet seen in the media . you can't stop, you have to go go go ahead. no need to think that everything is now decided on the internet, but do not use the internet, whether we want it or not, all

the youth or maybe half of them are sitting there, and half of them are on the tv that we watch . uh, thank god the process has begun, but it may not be enough. although i do not agree, they say, a little is not enough, well, you need to understand that the internet is big money, these do not sleep. they will improve something, we must react, but in no case, uh, television, uh, do not close the screen, because 75% of the population definitely watches tv. you think we can't use these people, so this and that, well, and introduce these new elements. after the twentieth year , many new faces really appeared, many new opinions in the information space in belarus and it may seem that they have succeeded in everything well done, you can forget about self-criticism, you can consider yourself super-efficient. and now kohl says that vsevolod is more visible from the outside, the first question is for you.

you, as a person, in principle, have such a biased attitude towards the belarusian media field, not having an attentive monitor for many years , but what is your opinion, i heard behind the scenes. this is how they directly attacked us and our colleagues with active criticism. here, let's look at you conservatively, but this gives with such, let's say, soviet naphthalene. and this is important, most likely, not because even people are backward, because the psychology of the belarusian people is after all. people are closed, phlegmatic not many backward. no, not vice versa, left connected with the psychology of the people people are closed, uh, and extroverts. she can be an introvert in one place to somehow work this property of psychology. you have to watch and learn. here it is necessary to do, as it were, a flashing of consciousness, because i am a very active living environment here and i need some kind of olympic dynamo trailer faster, stronger, you need to understand that informational meanings. there narratives are images in the form of contours of the future. this is the same product as belazs, for example, or mafik just need

be able to sell, and belarusians. they are not natural salesmen. here, as it were, national mentality features. it's very thin stuff. here are older people. everyone is trying in some way. well, you need to look at the best option, and maybe if the people themselves, as you say, this is exactly what works, but it’s necessary no, i strongly disagree with you, because, well, everywhere it is universal media well, everywhere what - that is, the real identical, in fact, environment. here is what works some schemes of the form reception, if in one place, then they will work elsewhere, then the main linguistic cultural field, that is, it is the same semantic field everywhere, that ukraine russia belarus is a russian-speaking space, but the same everywhere, if something in one of the segments works in ukraine, then it is in belarus will work , you understand the adequacy of the adequacy. and the upbringing of a certain people is not perceived as a weakness and sometimes you understand, uh, breaking or doing something through some step is dangerous. here at the stairs is wrong. step aside you will uh,

spill, i’ll take out a bunch of hot hot cup somewhere, on the contrary, it’s looking, so you understand , you can’t rush with such processes. well, you can't be left behind. we have seen that somewhere here we are in the twentieth year on the internet. uh, certain processes were missed. we are a little behind, we started here, so to speak, our competitors get ahead and create problems for us. but uh, listen here in education. this is a conservative area. all reforms. should be carried out thoughtfully, and in terms of media right? the president says many have now paid attention to the internet, but our television channels, if in terms of objectivity in working with facts, are not fakes, but facts, we are ahead of most european ones. in reality, this is real, but the weekend took the shock channel, the pits and the riot police turned off the brand and that's it. we have a problem. what do you understand? uh, is there a crush? because it's called boiled, you know? we have no

control over the platforms. this is the main problem here. you release the best broadcasts. and if he scores good its visibility is banned, that is, not, uh, the environment, it turns out that everything is not competitive, it's all a lie about free funds. i strongly disagree with you. but recently, the most famous football player in russia. therefore, god said we live in an era when the form and style are more complicated than factual and said, this is about alexei arrestovich, you need checkers or go, well, you don’t need to glorify, in fact , they talked with you behind the scenes about what belarus is all that he says eat. they also talked about the seldom last week, he says, i would be ready to smooth it over. we have something like that's it. even our structure is called a little differently, it acts a little differently. well what is it? well, here, i listened to you with belarusian calmness with the belarusian mentality calmly normal

in the information counteraction of information wars there is a concept, the target audience of influence, the target audience of belarusian is one ukrainian, this is completely different russian content is the third, respectively, with each target audience of their belarusian, also youth environment is older environment, everyone works at their own levels, as for, if there is something similar in belarus, it is concentrated in the field of protection of protection. this is our counter-propaganda. protection is, accordingly, there is a certain unit in the information technology sphere, and the president here very clearly identified our mental problem, we need to work actively, including on the other side. what is so protection is always a loss. unfortunately. well , sometimes get caught. we are catching up with the best offense defense. we're catching up on uh accusations against us and we'll think through the week like this accusation to leave. we've been spinning information for a week. they've already moved on to another thread.

they are doing other things. look , there are such well-established terms among journalists. yes, like tipsula, ukrainian or olginsky trolls, who sit somewhere near st. petersburg and reflect. or, for example, we don’t have such an attack , or we really do. this is some kind of secret organization that you simply don’t say, or we really perform this very function as journalists, but it seems to me that the ministry of defense still owns some secrets. you just ca n't tell right now. i wanted to say what we are today. well, i don’t know what kind of secrets you are operating on today. we perform the function that we must perform in terms of information and psychological technical protection. the twentieth year - it showed which one was the most let's say. eh, the strong structure of the power block on whom, in principle, everything in these facts and events relied on the power block, who turned out to be a monolithic power block, including the armed forces. there is divisions too. but the media, too, the bald

ones defended themselves, we stand firmly. no, it's all good. the rest, who will protect? for this, there is an appropriate structure, how to say, which we can limit traffic , slightly reduce the possibilities in terms of using the internet, but there are forces of special psychological operations and in general in the world. it is now a tendency to sometimes divide the press. here, at the same time, you will obey the entire minister, and he will show you if there are fakes here, if you you cannot prove here that you are responsible for this word, but we must have special organizations that we will not name, which will create problems there. that's right, comrade colonel, when there is even such a concept, when you ask a problem with opponents next to you, ha, the journalist is hating, you understand? that's why i want to say what's what from this. here. eh,

the smile is really, well, because, first of all, the intonation is very familiar so it's so nice to hear, eh. secondly, well, well, here they must be who they are, wait they do. here's the full colonel. he solves his problems. he has a whole division, and he clearly outlined the area that he closes. what the belarusians do, all the more so, these are secrets. military- i don't want to hear it. ah here is, and andrei indeed hmm last week. uh at several events and meeting with the secretary of state. and now at a meeting with journalists. the head of state repeated that we do not need fakes, although objectively. well, on the same internet, it diverges most actively and, uh, chews on the audience, just the same. well, impudent spoon quotes, the more it gets, it recovers faster once again becomes true. yes,

this raises a question. how will the work of belarusian propagandists change, because on the other side they said that, yeah, lukashenka was flying to lie, so before that they lied. this gorgeous lukashenka is forbidden to lie. so before that they lied. maybe they didn’t lie before either, but then they thought, did lukashenka forbid us to lie? what logic is not for them, andrei see this story from the mobilization. yes, uh, we're going to have mobilization. the president started talking to you about how we're not going to have it. well, this story was thrown in. she twirled like this, someone believed. and the question is the same question. what to do with it ? well, well, nothing can be done about it, except to clearly stand firmly on its own and repeat it will not. the president said she won't trust her president and so on and so forth to decline in this one question first of all in the information field in the information fight. there are laws. there are principles.

this is science. sorry, of course, science shows that the americans call this behavior change. e, in the russian federation is called e, influence on decision-making, and so on and so forth. eh, for this you need to dose a lot. uh, let's say false information and the proportion of verified information that we are seeing today in ukraine in ukraine yes, they said very correctly. lies lies first they listened to her 3 4 and they listened to her what is happening today even the western media do not rely on the mass media of ukraine do not rely. all serious analysts today operate with the facts of serious news agencies, even on my mobile phone only these agencies are present, for example, the protein ria news xinhua french news, central further e fox news

serious verified sources. look at the new york times here. so the washington post, this is a serious source of seriously ideologize. look now look when the information is given thus, at least four people who know about the condition of the leader of iran tell us that he is dying ; all this that he writes, as you say, is very respected very seriously and with deep historical roots and buildings, as in it reacts information hygiene information education. serious people will not react to this, serious people. these are the analysts, these are the decision makers. everything else. unfortunately, it falls under the influence of who these infa are, who this information is being made we thought about who this sea sea sea sea sea of ​​various telegram channels is. everything else young men girls 20 dash 30. year old guys

have absolutely no thought about whether, er, basically, well, how to say that this information is right or wrong? no, they just produce produce produce produce. and we are comrade colonel, if they agree, but, in the twentieth year, it was not nasties, not experts, who went out on the street, but those people who are amenable to informational and psychological influence and tasks. uh, those very organs, there is a cyclion to counteract and prevent the influence of an information-psychological nature on our population, at least so that they do not succumb to some kind of emotional outburst suddenly. uh, started to get better. well illustrated. uh. what is the thesis, probably, what happened again at the weekend. and yes, well, yes it did.

well, such a number of children, which i didn’t expect, probably, none of the adult thinking prepared people it happened out of the blue, because the tiktok blogger on her social networks said that she's going to have a fan meeting. for the most part, we don’t know and haven’t heard , and, probably, even older guys are young. there, the same twenty-year-olds did not hear. it turns out that we live in general on different planets. we just live in different focus groups. as they say, in social information fields , information fields, moreover, you look who came there, young people, teenagers of 14 years old, that is, because of this opportunity for them to gather people through the internet, the most prone to they, but they don't watch political shows, it should be

noted they don't read. good. here is valeria , by the way, again, we talked with you. behind the scenes, who should then work for them fourteen-year-old guys, but are they wearing shoulder straps or are they suvorovites sitting two troubles troubles cadres and making managerial decisions. the first trouble, frames. they need to be educated to develop a person with a high level of intelligence education, very responsive to all events. it's just like that. how to say zhivchik is mobile and who knows how to do this, the second trouble is the control system the management system, which today we are belarusian, is mentally afraid of some kind of cry. we are afraid of some remark from above that this is not so and the president said it. let's live a little differently. this is the job of the president now. he outlined it for us to develop precisely this system, the management system and the personnel system. if we do this, if we are already, and then we will be active. if normal cadres come and

a normal management system, then everything will be more or less fine with us. yes you have just a basic fundamental mistake. everyone. you do not understand, here is the best textbook on political technologies russian oleg matveychev wrote that he says a very simple thesis there, political strategist and media technologist. first of all, he is an artist and a creative person. they served, in general, the incompatibility of service people in the media should not be allowed. it 's totally different. it's a creative profession, like a designer. something to invent images. they are by statute. i almost agree with this. uh, there are just two approaches nato from the very beginning of its creation made an approach on information-psychological manipulation, but it works. what is the difference between the warsaw pact . the lord has become a logical advocacy approach who won and who won that's 'bout i'm running. in general, i would doubt a little, because let's still estimate. i agree that information wars carry great danger and move great things. the number of 13- and

14-15-year-old teenagers who, whether due to appropriate upbringing or an appropriate general level of education, are not considered serious literature of the channel? yes but no information war will raise the banner of the reichstag to us in a stag, the normal yegorov will raise it when he reaches the future, because let's look at the result after all. we are in the process now. yes, we are actually in the process and are starting to break the cube that says that nato has won, as i understand it, yes, when they know that you have enough strength to raise your knowledge with a restag, they set the task of destroying it from the inside to create socio-political instability. our main problem. serious technical lag in control

media space of the world, and do not control the global media space, the only thing to cut off for the chinese is to create their own analogues, being the second economy in the world, he correctly says - it is very expensive internet - it is very expensive. this is huge money. they spend billions of dollars. first, they control all the major social networks, but the major video platforms and how you work effectively entering the audience. we are here on our own, as they say, in the media space markets. we can at least counteract more or less effectively, but in an international key, it is very difficult for us, because she lacked the prohibitions for us. to us something to forbid to supervise conditionally. well, let's shut down instagram let's shut down youtube well, they say there's a way around it, of course not. i've been listening carefully to this emotional discussion. the question, of course, is quite complex and multidimensional, but we must understand that today, e work in the information space. it is built not

only through the media through social e-networks, but one must look wider. and just the example that you gave is that a twelve-year-old girl collected in this pier. eh, the same yes, that is, uh 12 years old. well first, adults first, it's a girl playing. you must have seen her video there. yes, uh, when she looks away there and tells her what to say and how to say it? uh, it works. that is, this actress is actually made an actress for her. well , this slime is still a weak actress, about which i want to say that we need to look at this work more widely and include it, of course, and education. and the education system should also open here, uh, more actively, therefore, yes, ours. today they will give bans from the

other side to our journalists. here is your view, as a legislator yes, our journalists, or those who are involved. this media defense lacks courage or cynicism, because in ukraine you know enough cynicism, but i still support the progressive very much. needed because she is not working. yes, you are 1 second. may i speak? here you again sang the washington house, new york times. well, let's just say that people who know know that, uh, how everything is connected there, and who throws articles there, who throws blogs and and these publications. they are, of course, they are built into that propaganda machine as a whole. smoky,

but it’s impossible for a journalism student sergei anatolyevich and the new york times, and all the other newspapers that i spoke about, this is an indisputable authority. that's the problem, but when uh former president, u usa says these newspapers are fake news and they proved it. you know, they have their time, in general. uh, losses to the president. you see, there is such a story here that we are talking about god's trump . we have accomplished a lot since 2000, but the world is changing rapidly and we need to keep up. and in my opinion. today, you know, here again everyone is talking about the operational speed, well, problems today the meanings of meanings are even in analytical programs today. yes, there is enough

real analytics with real information, which definitely needs meaning; it is in demand to quickly produce thoughts, those who then are authorities in society or not, is the spirit, on the one hand. uh, a certain mass grouping is conditionally a group that has been read. uh, the internet got emotionally overexcited. yes, here, as they say, an ambulance and treatment are needed, but after all, not everyone is like that and we do not want to turn into a society of idiots. include one instrument to another. if you need a person of this age, so that he does not die, he is engaged in physical education. you need an olympic champion. you are undergoing olympic training. if you need a special forces hand-to-hand combat specialist, he should kill in 3 minutes. you understand, therefore, a technique for analysts. this petya will

watch the teak girl. just won’t look, i’ll give you an example of a protein 37,000 subscribers yellow plums gained 200,000 in a year and a half, working in a different field, so we must have different working methods and all the tools are good, but the respectability of the information field cannot be killed, because we will approach trust, therefore, a penny. he supervised and bred all this, he says, here fourteen-year-old boys work in tiktok. here, twenty-year-old boys work in yellow plums, and here, 45-year -old uncles write analytics for some secret channel labeled secret secrets. we have this. but it means that you see that we asked this question, but we must go to this, it will say. here i am talking all the way. we have military secrets. probably i observe as an experienced person with an information field. i saw several special technological operations carried out by the belarusian authorities. successfully they were carried out and glory. we

will not explain everything to god what kind of operation it was, but another question is that we must act even harder on their field. russia has the resources and today there should be a special group in texas near mexico, which will will remember why they killed 2 million of the local indigenous population. after all, he is right, in fact, that an artist is needed, a creator is needed, but i insist that in our belarusian realities, next to such an artist should be a living man who knows the charters, an ensign. yes, only then the artist will not declare that i am an artist. that's how i see it and leave me alone. yes, i’m here, it doesn’t make sense that it works, it should strive for universalization, like a sexual language, the universalization of a visual language, which is as

possible, on the contrary, with one content, as possible capture more audiences. that's why we're aiming here, which is actually upper class different different. anyway, i see how the state kind here just encapsulates itself puppets, talking completely about their office in their own language. i see here, they say you need a complete analysis. and you want to say, but that the statistics of milk yield has nothing to do, in principle, with reality. wait about that on young grain doesn't matter. especially now, for some reason, even literature cannot be sold to young youth under any circumstances. word well done who is there 18.000 sauce? let's calm down a bit. yes yes. yes

, right bitch belarusian territory belarusian people with their mentality here in this field the state has put things in order, no matter how skeptical it may seem to you. now the president was talking about the field that is not on the territory of belarus abroad for this, what is needed first resource-technical, which will be there, as you said right? uh, well don't dominate. and at least convey or be able to convey certain information, the second, again bring back the cadres who can speak, not only speak this language. well, to also be understandable in the language in which it will work, because i say it again, we will not achieve anything by defense. an example is very vividly shown. how necessary to have these frames. riga communication center literally 4 years ago. there was a recruitment of not just russian-speaking personnel, which is enough in

riga. there are many russians of this monument. here are but who understand the language of the youth, who know how to speak with it and who understand the shortage of personnel, and they turned for high wages, our president spoke about the need to build such a potential, which in the end will be able to work there too . that's it in this. now, if look at your two theses, the first thesis, uh, artie. yes, a great attempt was made, what came out of it. it turned out to be practically blocked and the second moment of every speech of the president every now. uh, such a meeting with representatives and immediately all over the world, practically including those of these

publications. yes, which i immediately criticized there are quotes from the statements of our president, what does it say? again, this is about meaning. you look every time, uh, there are certain meanings. yes, they do send messages, that is, first of all, you need to be able to speak and you need to feel this one, and the relevance of this moment, so i don’t deny technological technical financial possibilities. they are always important, but can anyone else speak? what he says and when he says, i'm just talking about the two necessary components of a comrade colonel. i want to add a third one, in order to successfully to work in a foreign field, outside we need a creative creative petrov. yes, meanings, sowing in all directions and ensign bashirov , who will carefully watch for

petrov to sow where necessary and then when necessary and so we must understand, but we must understand that everyone protects their information field each therefore. eh, this is also a very question. it seems to me that our problems are in the cameras. yes, i think it's natural, because the state is too big for this. uh, in this situation, artists themselves are not born. it's like a natural situation, if there was a more liberated state, you would be more people. so, in principle, the problem is in the belarusians, psychological and some aspects, but by nationality, the belarusians are a sixth-generation bobrychan, but i reforged myself. ukraine greatly liberated its society, which led to several saints, kyrgyzstan, the most unsuccessful country among the cis countries, was liberated, therefore, according to about the president's speech is excellent. it 's excellent. here is the president's nuclear weapons speech,

and delivery vehicles. unfortunately limited, because they control you can interpret the bible, you understand, therefore there is a bunch of no interviews of the president with the tin that they left him. this is what we need to understand, look, what is the problem of vsevolod. it seems to me that he believes that if you leave the state, some mushrooms will grow. yeah. and they will manage themselves. yes, let's look at the americans, her extremist radio liberty, in my opinion, is far e no, a private office and not by itself there. some grants get the best resources vsevolod e, the same polish are all state-owned, so you don't have to do it yourself grow up in a talented environment. it doesn't grow anywhere. well, listen, i sprouted myself. in general, i have an education in a financial college, and belarusians without a desk will talk about information security and

personnel, here. we kind of came to the conclusion that the belarusians, it seems, are to blame through the mouths of our ukrainian. uh, the visa officer who was just now, yes, olga mikhailovna at the surf department, they really do come. well, let's say there k conceived. uh, quiet calm people who in principle, they cannot take place in the profession. of course not, there are talinovity velma arrogant in a certain sense, young people. who knows what leo can be, what we are, just what platform are we talking about and we talked about tektoks about instagrams, and we already have them to improve, and the most important thing, i mean don’s whining, is that the knee-deep students are coming to the university. we say from their minds that i won’t ask for a mass of information withheld on the summary, and that’s what, that’s what they said, that the power here is the duty to let go of the face. let's do it right at the very top - it's not like that,

look. well, not all of them go to the state media. i take the state exam, i know for sure that most of them. either he leaves the profession altogether, or he goes near the state, or even not the state, media, but we don’t stop for practice and the size of the colleagues retained by the media, people canceled the training on the budgetary form, and they, having begun the guilt, yell there revelation for violating themselves free of charge otrimlivali sudovannogo degree were able to so many machines maslyak, of course, this is already the departure, but if we look at our route of information, the velmishmat courts of their young television-like states. it would be great. if you really could, well, thank you and be useful, and not just sit quietly and write in your place. uh, the number of words that is there, but requires editing, for example, or do uh, the amount of information. you are looking at journalism footage. well, at least somehow, at least through other people's eyes in order to understand whether they are needed or not, or needed, frame adjustment frames

psychology cadres, there i do not know the faculty of international relations should. to work i'm sorry to work in the same tiktok as a journalist and you don't have to be by education. this is what we talked about in the previous part of the program. yes, a journalist is based on a fact, and a person who can say something in his blog in his tiktok. well, the fact may not be, he can simply express his private opinion his fantasy, i don’t know my idea, professional gifted creative, fluent in foreign languages, able to work in a team. if such a person is found welcome in vain, we released all the conclusions. yes, in my opinion, everything except the team. yes, we can return it. i don't agree with you that at the heart of, uh, a journalist is a fact; at the heart of a journalist is language. and let's see, let's just say it straight, some journalists convey facts in the language, other

journalists, far from the fact, use the same language. so, therefore, the main merit of a journalist is that he will say, including the person who is not a journalist, who sometimes writes, sometimes they do something. this is what journalist. maybe your words can be turned into some kind of academic vocabulary into human andrey, here they are in journalism. the first author's column appeared and i remember it in the spring. ah, the twentieth year. it was andrei mukovin. after him were all the others. my question is, after all, it was just like that, because until august of the twentieth year. yes, before that we had different, wedding, hosts as those people that we looked at and said they were television stars. now these stars are completely different, so this is the author's journalism. she is, as it were, one of the payments of this information struggle, you know that a person and his

eyes are behind the word. you see, in general, yes, yes, this is it . actually that and than than author 's journalism. well, let it be called that since there is already a term, how it differed from all the previous ones, and this is what, it seems to me that the journalism faculty should educate the main thing, because now it’s not so important where they work out their budget, as it were, probably, but now it’s much more important than what quality the patriots will come out with faculty, journalism, not only with this faculty, but journalism. as you understand it, it’s just this thing to shift in order to return, usually they kicked me out of the talk show , they return the first one. you see, and now, as for the questions, well, yes, it had to happen at some point. well it happened to me so so so so. it turned out that i was everything, as they say, i started to tread the path, a person had

to stand up for the cops and say, this is what i think, and you will not move me from this point of view, until you bring up a serious question, as the pioneers of this very authorial journalism, is it real what do we lack courage and cynicism or talents for what in order to take and express our point of view in order to take effective work really in order to in order, in principle, to understand that your word works. if we talk about that, and even the president says that the truth is our word, the truth, and not like everything he says is a lie. fiction is not enough not enough. for what in the end, wait for what in order to win sympathy, make as many of the audience as possible loyal only to themselves. here, so that state narratives cannot be sold with meaning. see how we differ. and i don't need to please the audience. and i'm not going to please this audience and

sell myself to it. i'm not chasing get likes. you are the old man. and now i'm telling you, but i agree not young, yes, and they will turn their backs on me, many. yes, and then they will come back here for bread. i'm sure in vain i head to the ashes that you are not young not effective kamash, parsley swan. i'm only talking about the fact that these people can now be transferred with their own money, it's all some kind of problem. we must denote. you understand, this is one of the tricks. even to convince. that's how i'm convinced now that everything, uh, russia is not capable of anything, is trying to convince belarus, or all the sanctions are already such that the economy will never rise one of the ways of psychological influence. remember the russians scattered spoons, soup is waiting for you. come captive. we will never be captured, we are aware of our value, and we have a bunch talented youth. and once again i explain

the problem, the main one is uncontrollable. we are technical means, but for this we have realized today and we are working on it with you, probably, we control it. no. i'm still talking. well, actually the information space. we defended very well today, we defended it significantly , so that you know the guys who climb there, where you don’t need to see through everyone, so be careful, but on the other hand, we are fighting, as we say, for meanings because of the brains. i didn’t say in vain that the effect of what we supposedly will have mobilization. i had to explain to the president himself. after all, they abandoned it and paid off, like from this, and defending the president's rating is really real trust and rating. and whoever listened to him, you understand or not, there were examples of you in certain countries where the president spoke, and you went and swept away everyone with what you said well, we really have a president and a leader of opinions and a leader of a state or a sod, but we have our

own authority to create a system of sustainable collective lukashenka, we must be sustainable. god bless alexander grigoryevich and vladimir vladimirovich to all our leaders, but we must have a stable system that, regardless of the ability of the leaders, which is very important, especially for the slavic peoples, has such a leader and so on. it could be resistant to external challenges and was, but i want to say that after the twentieth year the system became much more stable, therefore , these soft methods of color revolutions were no longer used against us. a tougher phase began, a hot phase of a hybrid war. this he says that we have already become more effective in socio-political terms, i agree that the president really said that our system should be sustainable. well, as we have, a good initiative from above, that is, the president of vertical authority. but vsevolod, despite his anarchism, proposes, well, a curious moment to somehow curb it, including some initiatives from below, and

natalya ivanovna kachana said, what mechanisms can be for this, that the grant system is made small grants like this students money. well, everything will always be based on money, either you pay or they will pay, the americans will buy them and we will have twenty speaking, there should be a social elevator, and i went in due time. actually a person. it's just that from the streets i had an education in general, please. here, look at our tv channels, radio stations, newspapers, they were born opinion leaders, indeed, after the twentieth year of journalism. after all, it is very self-sufficient in itself. a structure that can give them out on a mountain. well, at least a little not dozens, but a couple of people a year, too. you have this is how petya says some kind of history from below, maybe from below the initiative of the journalism faculty, bsu, and the future. yes, here at your studio of students olgis are ours, which ones come after charging?