about the life and work of the iconic representatives of the musical art of our country, music, it has always caused an internal response. this is a sign of very talented serious composers, he felt the characters' characters very vividly and embodied his feelings with a concrete sound. all information is firsthand. if he hadn’t been the way she was, then i think that i would have written something for a while, we will introduce them to their activities and dispel the myths over our

half-black forces, when he became the director , this is very much for him. because any theater, this very complex organism. watch the belarusian composers on belarus 24 in the program. a program about unique personalities who break stereotypes, an example from their own experience who admires cars there, please, through someone i don’t know that he also likes more history with bracelets, watches and smartphones. by the way, this is quite a rare device. it was produced during the war, it was called either trench or tank, very compact and i think that he really participated in the battle, but a good thing. she's well small quantities are done. there

can't be too much quality. if i hadn't spent some 300 dollars or bought this device. we would just pass them by investing in old things, especially in good condition, by the way, they are hardly a detail. i think it can be made into this. well, okay, let's fasten it while it waits, watch the program to break stereotypes on belarus 24 tv channel.

this is a socio-political talk show, in essence, today we will talk about national information security. kirill kazakov and alena surova are working with you. hello, good evening. start our discussion. i would like an event that gathered last friday in one

iconic place in khatyn. uh, journalists, bloggers, opinion leaders, andrey, you, like me, were present, the head of state met with those who, well, today, or something , forms and implements the state agenda and i would like, probably, to understand, yes, all the responsibility that lies on the shoulders of those who carry opinions. m-m heads of state, in principle the state position through their texts, their vlogs, their speeches, and, uh, 90% of what was said during this conversation was clearly not to be changed for publication, but at the same time, obvious accents, including in the work of the media, were placed, so i will ask, and our directors . uh, now show on the screens. a fragment of alexander lukashenko's speech, which, in my opinion, we have not yet seen in the media we must not

stop, we must go forward. we should not think that everything is now decided on the internet, but not to use the internet, whether we want it or not, all the youth or can, half of her sits there, and half is there and on the tv that they watch with us. uh, thank god the process has begun, but it may not be enough. although i do not agree, they say, a little is not enough, well, you need to understand that the internet is big money, these do not sleep. they improve something. we must react, but in no case, uh, television, uh, do not close the screen, because 75% of the population definitely watches tv. you think we can't with these people, so this and that, well, and drive these new elements. after the twentieth year, there really appeared a lot new faces a lot of new opinions in the information space of belarus and it may seem that

right now they have succeeded in everything well done , you can forget about self-criticism, you can consider yourself super-efficient. and now kohl says that vsevolod is more visible from the outside, the first question is for you. you, as a person, in principle, have such a biased attitude towards the belarusian media field, who has not been monitoring an attentive monitor for many years , but what is your opinion? i heard backstage. this is how they directly attacked us and our colleagues. here, let's listen to you conservatively, but this gives with such, let's say, soviet naphthalene. and this is important, most likely, not because even people are backward, because the psychology of the belarusian people is after all. people are closed, phlegmatic, not many are backward. no, not vice versa, left connected with the psychology of the people people are closed, uh, and extroverts. you have to be introverts. in one place somehow work this property of psychology. you have to be able to watch and learn. here it is necessary to do a kind of flashing of consciousness , because here is a very active living

wednesday and need some kind of olympic dynamo pizza. faster higher stronger, one must understand that informational meanings. there narratives are images in the form of contours of the future. this is the same product as belazs, for example, or mats. you just need to be able to sell, but belarusians. they are not natural salespeople. here, as it were, national mentality features. it's very thin stuff. here are older people. everyone is trying in some way. well, you need to look at yourself for the best option, and maybe if the people themselves, as you say, are like this, then this is exactly what works. i'm with you like i strongly disagree, because, well, everywhere it is a universal media well, everywhere there is some kind of real, identical, in fact , environment. here is the fact that some schemes of the reception form work, if in one place, then they will work in another, then the main linguistic cultural field, that is, it is the same semantic field everywhere, that ukraine russia belarus but the russian-speaking space, but the same everywhere, if something in one of the segments works in ukraine, then it will work in belarus, you understand the adequacy of the adequacy. and upbringing

certain people do not perceive as a weakness and understand sometimes uh breaking or doing something through some step is dangerous. here at the stairs is wrong. if you stumble, you will er, spill, i’ll take out a hot hot cup somewhere, on the contrary, it’s looking, so you understand you can’t rush with such processes. well, you can't be left behind. we have seen that somewhere here we are in the twentieth year on the internet. uh, certain processes were missed. we are a little behind, we started here, so to speak, our competitors are ahead of us and create us problems. but uh, listen in education. this is a conservative area. all reforms. it is necessary to carry out thoughtfully, and in terms of media right? the president says many have now paid attention to the internet, but our television channels, if in terms of objectivity in working with facts, are not fakes, but facts, we are ahead of most european ones. in reality , this is real, but the weekend took the

uznaenka channel, the pits of the amonka were turned off and that's it. we have a problem. what do you understand? eh, if delivery? because it's called boiled understand? we have no control over the platforms. this is the main problem here. you release the best broadcasts. and if he gains, uh, good visibility, he is banned, that is, not, uh, the environment, it turns out not to be competitive, it's all a lie about free funds. i strongly disagree with you, uh, here is recently the most famous russian polytechnologist, so god said we live in an era when the form and style are more complicated than fantasies and said, this is about alexei arrestovich you checkered or go. well glorify the unworthy no need, in fact, here with you, behind the scenes, they talked about what is in belarus . everything he says is there. here, uh, seldom was also said last week. he says i'd be willing to flatten. we have something similar . that's it. even our structure

is called a little differently, it acts a little differently. well what is it? well, here, i listened to you with belarusian calmness with the belarusian mentality calmly normal . this is one ukrainian this is completely different russian content is the third, respectively, with each target audience and in the belarusian one too. the youth environment is the older environment. everything works at its own levels, as for, if there is something similar in belarus, it is concentrated in the field of protection of defense. this is our counter-propaganda. protection is, accordingly, there is a certain unit in the information technology sphere, and the president here very clearly identified our mental problem, we need to work actively, including on the other side. what is protection? defense is always a loss.

unfortunately, well it is necessary to submit, we are catching up with the best defense against attack. we are catching up, uh, with the accusations against us and we will think over a week how this accusation will go away. we have a week to unwind information. they've already moved on to another thread. they are doing other things. by the way, look, there are such well-established terms among journalists. yes, like ukrainian chicks or olginsky trolls, who sit somewhere near st. petersburg and reflect or, for example , we don’t have such an attack, or we have, really. this is some kind of secret organization that we simply don’t talk about, or we really perform this very function as journalists, but it seems to me that the ministry of defense still has some secrets. you just can't tell right now. uh, i wanted to say that we are uh today. well, i don’t know what kind of secrets we are operating on today. we perform the function that should be performed in the plan, informational psychological technical protection. the twentieth year - it showed which one was the most, say, so strong structure of the power block on whom

, in principle, everything in these facts and events relied on the power block, who turned out to be a monolithic power block, including the armed forces, too, but from below they are also bald, it turns out that they themselves defended themselves firmly standing. no, it's all good. the rest, who will protect? to do this, there is a corresponding how to tell everyone to deal with, when we can limit traffic, somehow slightly reduce the possibilities in terms of using the internet, one thing, but there are forces of special psychological operations and in general in the world. it is now a trend to divide the press. here, at the same time, you will obey the entire minister, and he will show you if there are fakes here. if you don’t prove here that you are responsible for this word, but we must have special organizations that we will not name, which will be there make problems. that's right , comrade colonel, when it exists, even such a concept, when you create

a problem, there is nothing against you, a journalist laughs next to you, do you understand? that's why i want to say andrey nikolaevich in what in what here it is. eh, the smile is really, well, because, first of all, the intonation is very familiar so it's so nice to hear, eh. secondly, well, well, here they must be who they are, wait, they do. here's the full colonel. he solves his problems. he has a whole division, and he clearly outlined the area that he covers the rest of the colonel. what are you doing belarusian topics. these are military secrets. i don't want to hear it. ah here is, and andrei indeed hmm last week. uh at several events and meeting with the secretary of state. and now at the meeting journalists. the head of state repeated that we do not need fakes, although objectively. well, on the same internet, it is most actively dispersed and, uh, chewed by the audience,

just the same. well, the impudent spoon quotes, the more she the faster she perceives once again becomes the truth. yes, this raises a question. how will the work in belarusian propagandists change, because on the other side they said that, yeah, lukashenka is lying with retil, so before that they lied, this gorgeous lukashenka is forbidden to be taken. means before this was lied to. maybe they didn’t lie before either, but then they thought, did lukashenka forbid us to lie? what kind of logic does not exist for them, andrei look at this story from mobilization. yes. uh, we will have mobilization. the president started a conversation with you that we will not have it. well, this story was thrown in. she twirled like this, someone believed. and the question is the same question. what to do with it ? well, well, nothing can be done about it, except to clearly stand firmly on its own and repeat it will not. the president told her not to

we will trust our president, and so on and so forth. this question is primarily in the information sphere in the information war. there are laws. there are principles. this is science. excuse the concept of science showing that americans call this behavior change. e, in the russian federation is called e, influence on decision-making, and so on and so forth. eh, for this you need to dose a lot. uh, let 's just say false information and the proportion of verified information that we are seeing today in ukraine in ukraine yes, they said very correctly. lies lies at first they listened to her 3 4 and they listened to her, what is happening today, even the western media do not rely on the ukrainian media do not rely. all serious analysts today operate with the facts

of serious news agencies, even on my mobile phone only these agencies are present, for example, ria news, xinhua french news, central further and fox news serious trusted sources. look at the new york times here. so washington post, these are serious sources. look seriously ideologized. and now look, when information is presented in this way, at least four people who know about the condition of the leader of iran tell us that he is dying, all this that he writes, as you say, very respected very seriously and with deep the historical roots of the publication, how information hygiene reacts to this information education. serious people will not react to this, serious people. these are the analysts, these are the decision makers. everything

rest. unfortunately, it falls under the influence of who these people are who make this information, they wondered who this sea sea sea sea sea of ​​\u200b\u200bvarious telegram channels. everything else boys girls 20 dash 30.-year-old guys absolutely do not think about, uh, in principle, well, how to say that this information is correct wrong no. they just produce produce produce produce. and we, comrade colonel , agree with ours, but in the twentieth year there were haters on the street, not experts, but those people who succumb to information and psychological impact and tasks. uh, those same organs. there, the action is called to counteract and prevent the influence of an informational and psychological nature on our population, at least so that they do not succumb to some kind of

emotional outburst suddenly. uh, began to be managed well illustrated. uh. what is the thesis, probably, what happened again at the weekend. and yes, well, yes it did. well, such a number of children, and which i did not expect, probably, none of the adult thinking prepared people it happened like this on out of the blue, because a tiktok blogger on her social media there said that she was going to arrange a fan meeting. for the most part, we haven't heard. and, probably, even older guys are young. there , the same twenty-year-olds did not hear. it turns out that we live in general on different planets. we just live in different focus groups. as they say, in the social information fields , moreover, you can see who came there, young people, teenagers aged 15-14. that is, uh,

because of this opportunity for them through the internet to gather people the most prone to acts it is they, but they do not watch political shows, it should be noted they do not read. good. here is valencia again, we talked to you. behind the scenes, who should then work for them fourteen-year-old guys. well, are they wearing epaulettes or is it the suvorovites who are sitting two troubles for cadres and making managerial decisions. the first trouble is frames. they need to be brought up by a person with a high level of intellectual education. very responsive to all events, just like saying zhivchik is mobile and who knows how to do this, the second trouble is the control system, the control system, which today we are the belarusian mentality. we are afraid of some kind of lokrik. we are afraid of some remark from above that it is not the same and the president said this. let's live a little differently. this is the job of the president now.

he outlined it for us to develop precisely this system, the management system and the personnel system. if we do this, if we are already, and then we will be active. if normal cadres come these normal control systems. then we will have more or less all is well. you just have a basic fundamental mistake in all. you don't understand. here is the best textbook on russian polytechnologies, oleg matveevshchikov wrote that he says a very simple thesis there poly technologist media technologist. first of all, he is an artist and a creative person. they served this in general things or compatible service people should not be released. it 's totally perfect. another is a creative profession, as a designer to come up with images, they understand according to the charter, i almost agree. uh, it's just that there are two nato approaches right from the start. the beginning of its creation made an approach to information-psychological manipulation, but it works. what difference does the soviet union the warsaw pact dominated from the propaganda ration. yes logical who won and who won that's '

bout i'm running. in general, i would doubt a little, because let's still estimate. i agree that information wars carry a great danger and move a large number of people aged 13-14-15 , who, whether due to appropriate upbringing or due to appropriate the general level of education do not read serious literature and channel. yes, but the banner on the drakestam. no information war will raise any information war in a stag, the normal yegorov will raise the future when he reaches there to speak. i because let's look after all at the result. we are in the process now. yes, we are in fact in the process and are starting to break the kitchen says that nato has won. as i understand it, you have enough strength to raise your knowledge with a restag set

the task of destroying the creators of socio-political instability from the inside, main problem. a serious technical lag in terms of controlling the global media space, and not controlling the global media space, cut off the chinese to create their own analogues, i am the second economy in the world. correctly says - it 's very expensive internet - it's very expensive. this is huge money. they spend billions of dollars. first, they control. the main social networks, uh, the main video platforms, and no matter how efficient you are, entering the audience, we are here on our own, as they say in the media space market. we can at least to counteract more or less effectively, but in an international key, it is very difficult for us, because we lack prohibitions, we can conditionally prohibit something from being controlled. well, let's shut down instagram let's shut down youtube well, they say there's a way around it, of course not. i've been listening carefully to this

emotional discussion. the question, of course, is quite complex and multidimensional, but we must understand that today, e work in the information space. it is built not only through the media through social networks, but we need to look wider. and that's just the example that you gave of what happened in this twelve-year-old girl collected. eh, like that, yes. i already knew, that is, 12 years. well, first of all, it's a girl playing. you must have seen her video there. yes? eh, when he looks to the side and tells her what to say and how to say it? uh, yes it works. that is, this is an actress, in fact, they make an actress for her. well, here is such a weak actress for the time being, what i want to say about what is needed for this job look wider and it includes, of course,

education. and the education system should also be here, uh, more actively turned off, therefore, our prohibitions on the other hand to our journalists. here is your view, as a legislator, yes, to our journalists, or to those who are involved. this media defense lacks courage or cynicism, because in ukraine there is enough cynicism, you know enough, i'm still very aggressive. fully supports the president that it is necessary to operate with the truth e with the wrong tools who work nato countries in such a schedule is not needed, because it does not work. yes, you are 1 second. may i speak? here you again sang the washingtons, the new york times. well, let's just say that people who know know that, uh, how everything is connected there, and who

throws articles there, who throws blogs and and these publications. of course, they are built into that propaganda machine as a whole, even for a journalism student sergey anatolyevich and the new york times, and all the other newspapers, about which i spoke, this is an authority, not wrangled. this is where the problem is. well, when the former president of the united states says that this is fake news these newspapers and they proved, you know, they lost their resuscitation in general, uh, lost the president. you see, there is such a story here that, well, about trump, too, uh, despite the fact that, of course, the head of state spoke critically, that one should not be complacent. we have accomplished a lot since 2000, but the world is changing rapidly and we need to keep up. and in my opinion. today, you

know, here again everyone is talking about efficiency, and speed, well, problems today, meanings of meanings, even in analytical programs today there is enough real analytics with real information, which makes sense to produce them to slow us down , those who then are authorities in society is yes on the one hand. there is, uh, a certain mass grouping of conditionally groups that have read uh, emotionally overexcited on the internet. yes, here, as they say, we need an ambulance for sex and treatment, but after all, not everyone is like that and we do not want to turn into a society of idiots. others, if you need a man that's aged, so that he doesn't died he is engaged in physical education. you need

an olympic champion. you are undergoing olympic training. if you need a specialist in your hand-to-hand combat for the special services, he should kill in 3 minutes. you understand, therefore, a technique for analysts. this petya will be watching a girl. if someone doesn’t watch, i’ll give you an example of a squirrel, 37,000 subscribers, yellow plums gained 200,000 in 1.5 years at all, working in a different field, so we must have different working methods and all tools are good, but the respectability of the information field you can’t kill, because under a pour of trust, and therefore he oversaw all this and bred it says. here, fourteen-year-old boys work in tiktok. here, twenty-year-old boys work yellow plums, and here, 45-year-old uncles write analytics for some secret. channel labeled secret secrets we have this. well, then, you see that we asked this question, but we must go to this and say. here i am

talking all the way. we have our military secrets. probably i am watching, as an experienced person, the information field. i have seen several special technological operations carried out by the belarusian authorities. they were successfully carried out and we will not explain everything what kind of operations they were, but it is another question that you should act even harder on their field. russia has the resources and today there should be a special group in texas near mexico, which will suffer because texas was taken away from the main one, so that the more important group lies there and will be remembered. why did it exterminate 2 million local indigenous people to support. he 's right, in fact, that an artist is needed a creator is needed, a creator is needed, but i insist that in our belarusian realities , a living one should stand next to such an artist . you know the statutes of the ensign no, only then the artist will not declare that i am an artist. that's how i see it and leave me alone

. yes, it makes sense to work here, it is necessary to strive for universalization, as a sexual language of the universalization of the visual language, in order to capture the audience as much as possible with one content. that's what to strive for here, what is actually above the cool different types here is simply encapsulated puppets themselves speak completely about their own language. i see from afar a comrade needs to be done, and you want to say, but the fact that inflation statistics has nothing to do, in principle, has nothing to do with reality. wait about that, well done grain doesn't matter. especially now, somehow, somehow, don't sell the young youth, don't crawl,

which is 185 there. let's do a little like that. yes , the current question. let me yes, right bitch belarusian territory belarusian people with their mentality here on this field the state has put things in order, how would you it didn't seem skeptical. now the president was talking about the field that is not on the territory of belarus abroad for this, what is needed first resource-technical, which will be there, as you said right? uh, well don't dominate. and at least to convey or be able to convey certain information, the second, again, i will return as a frame of personnel who can speak this language, not only speak, maybe also understand in the language where they will work, because i say it again, we are defending

we won't achieve anything. an example is very vividly shown. how necessary to have these frames. riga communication center literally 4 years ago. there was a recruitment of not just russian-speaking personnel, which is enough in riga . there are many russians of this monument. but those who understand the language of the youth, who know how to speak with them and who understand the shortage of personnel, and they applied for high salaries, our president spoke about the need to build such a potential that, in the end, will be able to work there too. why preempt. that's it in this. now, if you look at your two theses , the first thesis, and rt made an excellent attempt, what came out of it practically blocked the second moment of every

speech of the president, every here. uh, such a meeting with a media representative and immediately all over the world, practically including these publications. yes, which i criticized immediately come quotes from the statements of our president, what does this mean? again, this is about meaning. you look every time, uh, there are certain meanings. yes, the promises do, then there is a need, firstly, to be able to speak and also to feel this one, and the relevance of this moment, so i do not deny the technological technical financial possibilities. they are always important, but can anyone else speak? what he says and when he says, i'm just talking about the two necessary components of a comrade colonel. i want to add a third one, in order to successfully work in a foreign field, out there we need a

creative creative petrov. yes, meanings, sowing in all directions and ensign bashirov , who will carefully look to petrov sowed where it was necessary and then when it was necessary, and so we must understand, but we must understand that each defends its information field, each for this reason. eh, that 's also a question. such a very. i think our problem is staffing. yes, i think it's natural, because oh the state, uh, it's too big. uh, in this situation, artists themselves are not born. it seems to be a natural situation, if there was a more liberated state, you would be more people. so, in principle, the problem is in belarusians, psychological and some aspects, but in terms of national vulnerability they are in the sixth generation, but i reforged myself. ukraine has greatly liberated its society, which

has led to several saints, kyrgyzstan, the most unsuccessful country among the cis countries, has been liberated, so it’s great about the president’s speech. it's excellent. here is the president's nuclear weapons speech, and delivery vehicles. unfortunately limited because they control you can interpret the bible understand, so there is a kitchen interview of the president of the tin what they left of him? that's what we should be talking about understand, look, what is vsevolod's problem. it seems to me that he believes that if you leave the state, some mushrooms will grow. yeah. and they will manage themselves. yes , let's look at the americans, well, the extremist radio liberty, in my opinion, is far e no, a private office and not by itself there. with some kind of grants, practical society sprouts allowing the best to get to the top resources, all here, uh, the same polish all state-owned, so you don't have to do it yourself

grow in talent. it doesn't grow anywhere. well, listen, i sprouted myself. i at all education for financial colleagues, and we'll talk about this in belarus. we are talking about information security and personnel here. we kind of came to the conclusion that the belarusians, it seems, are to blame through the mouths of our ukrainian. uh, the visa officer who was just now, yes, olga mikhailovna really come like that. well, let's say, so obscure, but quiet , calm people who, in principle, cannot take place in the profession. of course not, we have stalinist velma's ambicides. some young people have a price. what know the lion can be, what we are just those platform who we were talking about about those who are about instagrams, and they already have a lot to improve here, and the most important thing is that i understand don’s whining that the university is being held back, we

say from their mind that yana will ask i held back about the mass media, and that, that's what they said for it, that the state is guilty of letting go, you see, let's decide for ourselves - this is not so, look. well, not everyone goes to the state media i'm taking the state exam know exactly what most of them are. either he leaves the profession altogether, or goes about state, and even non-state media well, let’s put a stop to the practice and the size of the cola retained by the media, our colleagues, people sent off on the budget form for ear, and she yapped there revelation because he handed himself free of charge, reprimanded by the court, had so many machines oiled, of course , they have already been cut off, but if we take a look at our information, the velmishmat of the ship's young talinovites, but it would be great if they really could, well, thank and benefit, and not just sit still and write in your place. uh, the number of words that is there, but requires editing, for example, or make uh,

the amount of video information, you look at journalism frames. well, at least somehow, at least through someone else's eyes, in order to understand whether they are needed or not, or they are needed, personnel for adjusting the frame of psychology personnel, there i don’t know the faculties of international relations or , nevertheless, the journalism department must to work, i apologize to work in the same tiktokke journalist and education is not necessary to be. here's what we talked about in the previous parts of the program. yes, a journalist is based on a fact, and a person who can say something in his blog in his tiktok. well , the fact may not be, he can simply express his private opinion his fantasy, i don’t know my idea, a professional gifted creative, who speaks foreign languages, who knows how to work in a team. if such a person is found welcome in vain, we released all the conclusions. yes, in my opinion, everything except the team. yes, we can return it. i don't

agree with you that at the heart of, uh, a journalist is fact that journalists are based on language. and let's see, let's just say it straight, some journalists convey facts in the language, other journalists, far from the fact, use the same language. so, therefore, the main merit of a journalist is that he will say, including the person who is not a journalist, who sometimes writes, sometimes they do something. that's what a journalist is. maybe your words can be turned into some kind of academic vocabulary into human andrey, here they are in journalism. the first author's column appeared and i remember it in the spring. ah, the twentieth year. it was andrey mukovin. after him were all the others. my question is, after all, it was just like that, because until august of the twentieth year. yes, before that we had different, wedding, hosts as those people that we looked at and said they were television stars. now these stars are

completely different, so this is copyright journalism. she is, as it were, one of the payments of this information struggle, you know that a person and his eyes are behind the word. you see, in general, yes, yes, this is it . actually, then, uh, than than the author's journalism. well, let it be called that since there is already a term, how it differed from all the previous ones, and this is what, it seems to me that the journalism faculty should educate the main one, because now it’s not so important where they work out their budget, as it were, probably, but now it’s much more important than what quality patriots will leave the faculty, journalism, not only from this faculty, but journalism. as you understand it, it’s just this, because now we’ll ask you to move in order to return , usually they kicked me out of the talk show, they return first, you see, and now, as for the questions, then, well, yes, it

had to happen at some point, it happened. well it happened to me so so so so. it turned out that i was everything, as they say, began to tread the path, a person had to stand up for the cops and say, i think so, and you won’t move me from this point of view until you bring up serious questions, like the pioneers of this very avtovskaya, journalism, really what do we lack the courage and cynicism or talents for what in order to take and say our point of view in order to take effective work really in order to, in principle, understand that your word works. if we talk about that, and even the president says that the truth is our word, the truth, and not like everything he says is a lie. artistic fiction is lacking. wait wait in order to win sympathy, make as many of the audience as possible

loyal only to yourself. here, so that state narratives cannot be sold with meaning. see how we differ. and i don't need to please the audience. and i'm not going to please this audience and sell myself to it. i'm not chasing get likes. and now i'm telling you, but i agree and they will turn their backs on me, many. yes, and then they will return here, for bread in vain they sprinkle themselves on their heads with ashes, that you are not young, not effective ozarion, kamash, parsley, swans, my bow. i'm only talking about the fact that these people can now be listed, in fact, everything is some kind of problem. we must designate. well , you know, this is one of the tricks. again, convince. this is how i am now convinced that everything, uh, russia is not capable of anything, they are trying to convince belarus or everything is already such sanctions that the economy will never rise one of the

ways of psychological influence. remember the russians scattered spoons , soup is waiting for you. come captive. we will never be taken prisoner , we are aware of our value, and we have a lot of talented youth. and once again i explain the problem, the main one is uncontrollable. we are technical means, but for this we have realized today and are working on it, so that we probably control it. no. i was still, but actually the information space. we today they defended very well, they protected them significantly , so that you know the guys who climb there, where you don’t need to see through everyone, so be careful, but on the other hand, we are fighting, as we say, for meanings and for brains. i didn’t say in vain that the effect of the fact that we supposedly will have mobilization. i had to explain to the president himself, because it was abandoned and it was bought like this, but it’s real to defend, yes, and the rating, and whoever listened to him, you know or not, there were examples in

certain countries where the president said, and you went and swept away everyone who else said well about this, indeed we have a president and a leader of opinions and a leader of a state or a sod, but we, by our husband’s authority, to create a stable system of some kind were told by the collective lukashenka we must be stable. may god grant many years to alexander grigoryevich and vladimir vladimirovich all our leaders, but we must have a stable system, which, regardless of the ability of the leaders, which is very important, especially for the slavic peoples, to have such a leader and so on. could be resistant to external challenges and whether it was here, but i want to say that after the twentieth year, the system became much more stable, therefore , these soft methods were no longer used against us, the color revolutions went into tougher phases, the hot phase of the hybrid war. that says that we have already become more effective in socio-political terms, i agree that the president really said that our system should be sustainable. well, as we have, a good initiative from above, that is, the president of

vertical authority. but vsevolod despite on his anarchism, he proposes, well, a curious moment to somehow curb, including some initiatives from below, and natalya ivanovna kachana said, what mechanisms can be for this, that a grant system has been made, small grants for these students money. well, everything will always be a transaction in money, either you pay or they will pay, the americans will buy them and we will have twenty speaking, there must be a social elevator and i was on it at the time, so i went. actually a person. it's just that from the streets i had an education in general, please. here, look at our tv channels, radio stations , newspapers, were born opinion leaders, indeed, after the twentieth year of journalism. after all, he is very self-sufficient. a structure that can give them out to nagora, well, at least a little dozen, but a couple of people a year too. you have, as petya says, some kind of history from below, maybe an

initiative from below, the journalism faculty of bsu well, of course, journalists, what about the future? yes, here at your studio of olgis students, there are ours. which ones come after charging, yes, and they learn from you and after that they fit and become leader. maybe you don't have to study. we, perhaps, can come up with the idea of ​​having such juniors, practitioners enter the audience of the new came and speaks to their classes, and he diluted the audience, and he is vigilant of this tower, then it lights up who can eat these conditions. yeah well, look. for example, i am a first-year student of journalism. here in september i came here, i worked out infuriatingly, looked at how my colleagues worked, took a couple of videos, brought them to you and told you what to do. no problem, we have confidence in a private conscience with a family mass media, we look, pepper these commercials. yaka cut off and get in touch with any of you are not talking about the media not about the state media we are now talking about work, well in another field i mean,

this is the field. we have shown this long ago that of course there is. we have problems here, because with the relatives of the media. yes, there are, uh, telegram channels for her instagrams. well, there, we are not yet as active as half of being there responsible for the fact that i am a student of journalism and bsu, or that this is so stream itself him, but it’s obvious that the information in telegram from the telegram channel is conditionally official journals. bsu will be read by a smaller number of people than the same one can be, seasoned with some other words and packaged, and in a different wrapper called a secret secret. eh, i mean, so it is with the wired university, that we are trying. messengers are different, like stamps of new media that students themselves cut with their own hands, they try to be new, and she tries student tv tower. we're giving some kind of flair. well, the maximum is, of course, and ukraine will grow up there, and there

should be media fighters. here is such an upbringing of a more military stream, harsh conditions, he simply teaches, and now a journalist is a media fighter, what is who? it? how psychology differs in the mentality of behavior can be explained by the girls, well, it's just that this place is aggression, this is an aggressive person. he is ready to adapt very quickly to the situation to everyone. let's take an example. grigory azaryonok. this is a media fighter or a journalist, so once again, well, more like a journalist, more like a journalist. here is vladimir solovyov, he can’t, fighter is good andrey media are afraid in the magazine what is it? well, as if from the point of view of a belarusian professional. or it's all the same. well, it's a very close general thing. it’s just that now vsevolod is talking about different hypostases there, but solovyov solovyov again has a path traveled there, and a background with prohibitions and clear work in very good. we

understand them very well and, as it were, a niche, yes. to that very focus group, i understand solovyov , because he started from opposite ideological positions in the nineties. yes, who 18 was a revolutionary, and who didn't become a preservative at 40? yes, here grigory has this whole creative path ahead, as i think, yes, the question is, if vsevolod means that a media fighter is one who will overwhelm opponents. uh-huh. it's the one that kind of throws poop back at him 300 times . i'll tell you wrong. i understand i'm cooking. what is media fighter. in contrast to the azarenok, he will not be able to enter the classroom here with these 200 students to explain something to them. can i not perceive? i won't argue, i guess. the question is, will he be able to or will he not be perceived? did not understand, i will not accept it, because narratives place the same style of presentation, it is not a generalist who will come to a strange audience.

and just like that, he waved with campaigning for the soviet example. an example of at least one journalist is such a person is such a person, or we are talking now. well, if we don’t talk about it, then this person enters our normal belarusian audience and after 10 minutes comes out spat upon. this i, as it were, say authoritatively, because that is, which he carries, it is impossible to listen to for a long time, but an educated person, when not, if the people excuse me hawala. here let hawala come here to reasonable people. we are talking about self-sufficiency for a week to me the main reach of the audience, if there is a person, comrade, colonel, this is how it is with us in any case, by the way, to be able to convince a prejudiced audience. this is the task of politicians and public leaders as well. and so let's say journalists be able to

convince, because if we absolutely refuse to cut it off as a certain part of society, we become less effective, another question is that we don't need any stamps and templates. do you understand? you came, and in this auditorium. you worked, i worked, when trusted resources from or you come, 80% of the opponents gathered, but then, when they sit in the audience, they try, respectively, to play along with each other, support each other, then come up to themselves and scold. thank you. you explained a lot to me on my facebook messages, i can publish hundreds of messages. thank you for this year. this is already addressed to the people who were on the side. lukashenka vladimir well, it was you who told a lie, not a lie. and that's why what is in your information, which is the facts with which you operate easily. you can enter in any case, no need to pretend to be. excuse me innocent motto. naturally. i spoke the truth, but i spoke, so the truth that i could put in place put on my knees. in a word, you understand a person, if it was necessary, and piss the other. you're still manipulating the audience is not absolutely

any policy. if you are told the whole truth the whole truth, he will fail in any election. naturally, if you announce tomorrow that you have say grain reserves for 3 years. it's good. and if you say something for two months you have. next in line are other representatives of the site of the republic, probably. there is. how is this the norm, you understand, a certain responsibility to the directorate, so i just say again that any politician tells you the maximum truth in the context that ensures the security of the nation, you understand or not, where some things are needed secrets, and i leave secret archives. until the colonel learned secrets. everything is right, but he did not speak you understand nothing, the very policy of the state of the national leader, the ruling elite must be honest, you understand it must be. i mean, you don't have to. take it literally, really. that's where it 's politics really. so he says that all politicians google a little. do not lie

with information flows do not create panic. do you understand? excuse me, you know, for myself i share two concepts of a statesman, yes, and a politician. well, there is, in my opinion, there is a difference. uh. it seems to me that e a media fighter is a beautiful figure of speech, of course, here is a clear definition, therefore, yes, a person first works on a slop bucket. you know, a year later, medina poroshenko is working on zelensky to destroy. this cannot be touched on the concept. yes so here, if it is possible, it should be a financial plan. everything was agreed, but the mental strength is still new under the moon. of course not, dorenko yes, remember, yes, how he destroyed, it seemed. yes, i'm

fine you every shift you like this figure infa killer yes but i don't. allow me one remark yes fertile ukrainian land gave birth to a lot of infobos. and that today everything is fine with you in terms of information? yes , eat warm, turn on the light again. yes? we are fine too. you can talk to each other whatever you want. yes, where are you and what do you have absolutely right you should understand with new year's greetings. and what do you understand in the end? in ukraine, they destroyed the information space, discrediting it on the one hand and the second moment, using it not to inform the population, but to manipulate themselves. well what a fight for flows will be drawn, of course, the resources that the oligarchs have collected. that is, this is not a completely

sovereign information space - it is a cesspool that destroyed, destroyed, in fact, the state. we need it, we don't need it. we need informational mma fights without rules, they temper. here i will make a remark. that's from everything. yes, this is, if the flour carrier in the twentieth year is for lukashenka and in the year 21 for someone else, and in the twenty-second he is already for the third, then i will say it. the position he is a journalist is then and will be like this case from what. right now, kirill gave examples of what you are talking about about venality, so in this case, i look at conditionally andrei, who wanders with his opinion first to one, then to another, simply not believing and believing him will not be effective. it is necessary to be universal

to think and somehow. you see, once again it is very important to preserve the credibility of the information space, trust us. i say it again, i spoke about one more thing. you must understand that the government must be decent with its population, and ten responsibility for their words to effectively manage the information space are completely different things, and we must share there are media. they will have to be strictly within the legal framework to be responsible for the fact that there are special response saws. and this is a completely different area. we protect the information space there. there we carry out informational attacks. but we must be civilized to go afloat to make the information space. self-destruction - it destroys the state. we are in it made sure. we should never come to this, this is not a civilized way. i saw how many people were in 2020, but no one wants to work with this to draw conclusions. why did she turn out like this? why are these people taller? why?

you didn't eat about me? wait, you saw here, you were here in the twentieth year all of july, i arrived, the second remark. tell me really, he says, no one can do anything with these people. well, we are working with him. everything is fine. this is the emotionality of the ukrainian mentality. i am i respect you with all my heart. here i am in the sixth generation with a ukrainian passport, something like that. yeah, bobruisk here. uh, what i wanted to. uh, we are now let's turn a little towards journalism. we have young staff, they are talented and creative. they really are our future question to you leading. and you, in fact, are not afraid that you have moved. here we are talking about where they are dear, where do they grow? no, well, probably, they are growing, probably, they are not afraid of competition on the part of other people. this is stupidity complete president, by the way, several once said, take off the crown. and this is a normal practice, because journalism is a profession

that, in principle, fascinates a lot of people and the fact that more people can stand behind us. i will not be surprised and even be grateful for this. another question that i would like. so i would like to see more live talk shows appear on our television and that it be hosted by those who would like to take our place so that we can compete with content when going on air at the same time. then it would probably be true, because viewer toggles buttons. because if we replace the hosts of this talk show, other people will come. well, it didn’t go like that anymore, and in fact on the internet. so you say, yes, because we, too. what was more telegram channels? and i’ll just say this, but they took it and turned off the electricity and there is no telegram channel. but there is a newspaper. there is a book , there is a radio and there is a television, and in fact it is our great conviction that we are talking about the need to live and work on the internet. we are very much mistaken that

these classic media have gone to second place. plan. this is completely incomprehensible. i want to say that after all, a state policy in the field and information activities has been built in our country. and there are a lot of components and we are partially talking about them today, uh, but nevertheless, the state will always be based on the state ideology. i understand sound-sound. how are you here? here talk like uh man, the history of the bbc night era and turn it on. well , in the ideology of what i have seen a lot in the west. yes, that's why i can clearly say that there is a state ideology. turn on cnn, i turn on and whom i saw 30 years ago, we have some new names and faces appear, but there isn’t, there are the

same heralds who are trusted, well , they leave, nevertheless, 5 seconds from shutting up the men zero students. and now we are a screen, so there is still a most serious ideological war going on and we should not, you know, be used. here, this is, uh, some rating things are popular. we must clearly understand where the state should be included and work. and where, well, let's say, professional actors who are today. there are, but in general, of course, they should use the so-called professional lies, including in journalism, to play the role of president, and experts are well aware of this. well, i would still, i would still not rule out the appearance in the media field of those very creative ones, those same creators.

those most untethered. yes, with two ensigns. here's how not to keep me here. it is quite possible, yes, such a story, maybe, but you know, sometimes i remember the soviet experience, agitation, brigades. yes, because in fact, in fact, a dialogue platform - it's the same thing, but, uh, i wrote a post on my instagram about the fact that there really must be some kind of incentive loyalty if you cross the lithuanian border of these crimea and you speak russian and they don't let you in this and this is the essence of this baltic incentive loyalty. after all, we, too , should have the same story, in theory , surrender, for example, to civilian america. do you know what history of america, which he wrote americans americans? try something else to do, and we are too liberalizing. and so, it seems to me that sometimes after these dialogue platforms, people need to arrange an exam whether they understand or not understand, this is a radical measure. and perhaps she will say air, but who did not understand to leave

for a second. sometimes these things are needed. well , summarizing, of course, there is truth here, too. in principle, for all our experts that it is important to be different, it is important to understand that we can not equally, addressing grandmother zina and the boy petya, but expect the same effective response. so if we are interested in our country being really strong and hmm standing confidently on its own feet, it is important to add a few pillars. well, the last. you know what to read books. many smart writers have described the life we ​​live in for us, and sometimes it is already written there. how to act.

the culinary traditions of belarusians are the simplicity of folk recipes and unusual cooking methods. and my mother took a deep breath to remember that i went to the living room with my mother, and she always asked her mother for trying with her aunt. i'm tasty. i have been arguing to share recipes that are passed down from generation to generation sofya mikhailovna skating rink. we will cook, that we will cook the meat here, this magic prunes, which i so diligently, you can sprinkle, we will tell you how to cook quickly and very tasty. and here is the case where cinnamon really is. mm very, very decorated. this dish, watch the culinary historical show belarusian cuisine on belarus 24 tv channel. these people are doing

everything to make our life comfortable with the work of the scientific road network. we are trying to achieve evenness of the coating so that our drivers and not only our guests feel comfortable moving along our street, imagine what would happen if there was no electricity during the day, any emergency is eliminated within two hours, no more, and they don’t work every day hands down. here we see a schematic representation of our transformer rebels, dispatcher. all this understands all this, seeing all this controls, for example, this is the philharmonic society we have here, we offer to spend one day with specialists and find out everything about their difficult business. ours is open 24 hours a day, no matter the weather. watch on belarus 24 tv channel.