complete chaos and total corruption washington's feint aid led to the worst economic collapse in the history of ecuador. but they got a lease on a place for a military base. this fact will have an impact already in 2006. american aid is very often applied on time, because the support of governments affiliated with america. uh, in political interests leads to several things. the first is the rampant corruption of plunder. this aid, the second thing you need to understand is that this aid is being returned to a large extent to the united states and everything, and the governments, which throughout the twentieth century, and the united states supported they were, and the buyers of american weapons, that is , ah, the military assistance that is provided by one government or another for stabilization is returned in the form of the united states in the form of proceeds from the sale of weapons and weapons of another business, the closer the deadline for curtailing the

american military base was, the more actively the us intelligence agencies incited the opposition to fight for independence. negotiations with washington to conclude a free trade agreement were terminated by the president korea condemned the us military doctrine providing for, if necessary, the entry of their ships into the territorial waters and river basins of latin american countries, the ecuadorian president said that his country, following venezuela, is ready to accept ships of friendly countries. why can the us 4th fleet patrol the shores of latin america while the russian fleet cannot do we live in a cold war welcome we will meet in our ports the ships of countries that want to cooperate with us also carre demanded to be overtaxed. profits of oil companies in response washington began to actively build up ngos in the country in 2010 alone, the us budget for ecuador exceeded 40 million us dollars and other media with this money. or conduct propaganda that they say the core is

a killer of democracy and freedom, and here is a familiar song, isn’t it true that these same structures also emotionally pressured belarus. police mutiny broke out they called on all civil servants to go on a mass strike. however, the people still supported the carre, then the american media deployed their weapons. as soon as the failure of the coup became obvious, the opposition media began to turn everything upside down. i had to, as a private person, sue three times for slandering the newspaper universe, which called him a dictator of putschists and terrorists as civilians and innocent people since then, relations between countries

have been just as strained, and in 2017, caret left the post of president of ecuador and went to live in belgium as a politician, even managed to work for rt as the author of the program. bolivia is in many ways the twin country of ecuador , also rich in oil, gas and ore deposits, and these , too, in the eighties were taken over by american business corporations. the united states did not even bother to negotiate with the country's leadership, and did not just buy land from local landowners, the seizure of bolivia's resources was another goal through them to get control over brazilian sources of energy saving reforms supported by the us led to the growth of the drug business. in 2005, the

country officially began to have limited sovereignty over the years, crises and american experiments. they did their job, moreover, later it became known that the drug lords had close ties with the us intelligence services, and the minister of the interior, the official president coordinated with the ambassador of the house of the brave in the middle of the zero bolivia, more than 400 american ngos did not smell, and washington's protege gonzalez ordered democracy in 2003. shooting protesters killed more than sixty people changed everything eva moralis. he became president in 2005 decided to fight back. the star-striped hegemony has come, uh, the left morales. and the course of the country is very strong, it has seriously changed for the americans, of course, they didn’t like it very much, because the morales came. uh, under the slogans of left turn, justice socialism and anti-e neo-colonialism, that

is, on the topic of the very slogans that are still relevant today. hmm, the us secretary of defense will say that morales is in blacklisted since then, the americans have tried several times to raise the rebellion funded the secret police, even the plane with morale. he himself was forcibly imprisoned in austrian vienna because the cia was sure there was edward snowden on board, but as you can see, the united states can do everything without any condemnation of the west and blinded human rights activists. the devil came here yesterday. with this speech, hugo chavez began the confrontation between venezuela and the united states for the leader, although not a small country, 26 million people live, but not a superpower, such a statement was a challenge to the us imperial order the united states all sorts of scattered to prepare a coup d'etat and

overthrow. uh, those forces that came to power on the anti-american anti- pyrialist as they say in latin america are constantly on the line, or maybe commit political assassinations, the united states does not hesitate to commit political assassinations at all. this is their genre. actually. it wasn't chavez who fired the first cia back in 2001. preparing for the elections on april 11, 2002. there was an attempted coup, also through the military and the opposition. then demanded to resign. he refused and was kidnapped by the americans, it was quite suitable for some puppet government, which would again give away oil reserves under the control of american companies. they privatized a state-owned company that produces venezuelan oil. well, and so on. that's all, it would be in the interests of america, but so far they are not succeeding. chavez was held captive from the oath, the puppet pedro carmono was brought, but

literally 48 hours later, 13 million people broke all the locals came out demanding the return of power. to chavez , the americans shuddered and recognized the legitimacy of the politician, a similar scenario was played out by washington in 2020, code-named operation united, after the failure of the coups in 2019 , the americans decided to land contrast troops, supposedly revolutionaries supporting another puppet in person. juan guaido's speech failed. and among the detainees were members of the presidential security service, the united states at that time , nicholas maduro ruled the country and the united states traditionally presented him as a murderer and dictator, who destroys his own people. of course, because of this, nothing was true maduro, just like chavez survived, and venezuela to

this day is a thorn in the american backyard. however, the country's leadership is confident. the neighbors from above will not let them live in peace, in the next program we will tell about the us crime in the middle east, there is even more destruction and crime with blood. happily. how to find humility and avoid all these sins, but the answers are the result of a person’s prayer, what do we know about the ancient and unique shrines of belarus by finding an icon this small specimen was brought to the mother of god exactly here, and already alexander solton, realizing this great gift of god in the form of this icon, decided to build a temple, where now the holy dormition crane

monastery is located. what is the power of the cross of the lord and the skin of us who heals ourselves as a christian, we measure the correctness of summer about the life-giving power of the roof. what is the media image of the priest? now more and more priests enter the format of the media space with different content with different topics, and even in our spiritual academy. uh, there were projects that were so successful at some points for different target audiences , we will tell and show them in spiritual and educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. movements breathing is the rhythm of life. fashion ideas visual form

is it? new theatrical forms author's reading of classical works search for sacred meaning every week we are in a new place, watch the project of fashion for culture on wednesdays on belarus 24 tv channel.

only the most pressing topics are in our program and questions. let's figure it out. why do we need these psychological settings. what are the boundaries of our self and where are we real stars and experts psychotherapists, in fact, i am a well-deserved artist. i am a very bad artist. to me very many consider it strange and crying. you see on the street ask around. i thought that if i suddenly have some hints for the crown , it means that my talent has become less than it is, they will teach me how to safely resolve any conflict situations. we continue to dislike. i'm not insisting in any way. see in

program to understand and neutralize on the tv channel belarus 24. good evening good evening, permanent party leader for 25 years, three times a presidential candidate for the fourth time. you filmed the provocative question yourself, but if you

hypothetically imagine you would like to be president in this crazy 22 year. thank you for asking exactly this why. because , actually, from the twentieth year, when the events began, this same one always considered and spoke, and in the nineteenth year and in the twentieth year he said that we should all support the only person is the president. a person who was really able to hold on to the very difficult situation of that time in the form in which it is presented today too. i hope we will talk in detail, therefore, in the twenty-second year. i think that we all owe everything if anyone considers himself a truly patriot, and i considered myself a patriot. we must rally. and who wants to love their country, who really understands what is happening, who just wants us to live in a normal state, do not forget that we are up to

they lived normally and well. the leadership of the country must support the president of the people who are now doing everything to ensure that we are in a normal position. that's what i think we should think in the twenty-second year. what is sergei vasilievich gaidukevich doing now and is it true that you have finally abandoned politics? this is a person who is a member of the supreme council of the party's highest governing body and who fully, together with the leader of the party, carry out political work in the party with the supreme council. i didn't go anywhere. i didn't disappear. yes, there was a period. uh, there was a period when my presence on tv screens was my presence, not the whole party, and my presence on the body of the

cranes was slightly reduced, you know. the illness was severe. but i'm proud, i'm proud that i withstood it and i'm proud that i managed to win everything, i'm in front of your eyes, but i'm never constantly in the political system. i, as they say, have officials in their office with a sign, why you are the chairman of the party in the office any questions? i communicate with people all the time, that is, in the twentieth year i lost. that is why i was in minsk in the twentieth year in your twentieth year. i was at the party headquarters, but i was able to take such pills, but how would you say that? yes, i’m not going to tell the citizens now. everyone gets sick, all different situations happen, but the parties and where i

stand always showed themselves and everyone saw it , including oleg sergeevich, who spoke and clearly showed the whole line that he is pursuing not only he, but the entire political party, which has a fairly decent number of people. well, oleg sergeevich yes, we are now seeing it quite a lot. and it’s good and i myself invite you with great pleasure. let's have a little. let's dive into history again. yes? this is interesting, of course, but i remember very well 2010, when you went to the circus with the activists of the party during the presidential elections, i clarify during the voting in the presidential elections, i answer if he and stv will take my speech in 3 days. before, where i gave a huge interview to all three television channels. i said the following , dear opposition gentlemen, who rushed to the presidential campaign in unison.

a competent, smart president gave you all a new year's gift, handed out candidate cards, i think this clowning that you arrange, you do not need these elections. go at least eight, at least nine, at least 10 people, the result will be one zero, they scored no, therefore, with a sense of good dignity. we went to the circus and showed during the voting not to the head of state, not to our people, but to them i promised them that they clowns received candidate cards as a gift. they also received it, and journalists were present, they would help ria novosti, and we told them all this , but we got the pleasure then when the results of the presidential elections this year were approaching. alexander grigorievich said, so in the hall, where i was also present, when he spoke there, he gave a huge press conference to a full house, he says, here sergey vasilyevich is sitting,

please, a tape for him. yes, as if i'm quoting a cassette of my speech. says posh performance. it is believed that your party began as a representation of zhirinovsky's party in belarus, yes it is necessary. yes , thanks to you, she very quickly became independent, in any way. today the internet is replete with predictions. e vladimir volfovich of europe in a global war, there are mobilizations and so on. so here's yours, essentially a fellow party member. he was a prophet or a good login, well the liberal democratic party of belarus has never been a branch. e vladimir bolshevik and the ldpr party but this was simply legally even impossible, because e party was established in february, 90. second yes, in february of the ninety-second year, the organizing committee. e, in the ninety- fourth year, we received registration. first, the organizing committee is created

. the structure is created. in the ninety-fourth year in february, february 24-26. we got, uh, we got a party registration certificate, which i want to say, well, first of all, in a sovereign state, and in this, it is impossible to be a branch of another political party. yes i am in 1992 when i was in charge the coordinating committee of the popular movement of belarus, which included 28 public organizations, came to vladimir volvich, and then we got to know him for a very long time. i watched it live. uh, you know, this person is completely different from the one who is in a calm atmosphere in the office. this is a different person. this is a kind somewhere even a gentle person, but in any case not before. he didn't scoff at me. i drove with him. naturally, these people with a capital letter like it, someone does not like it. and as for his views on the future, when he spoke, you know? for me as for a politician, he simply said what

everyone thinks and did not speak at his level, nobody wanted to, could not. he sometimes expressed his thoughts. even in the kitchen, zhirinovsky said to people, and everyone seemed to say that well , yes, he said so, and not everyone will admit that we thought so. he just spoke openly, which an official at his level would say, he would just be afraid of all zhirinovsky, he could say, for example, as he said loneliness . i remind you that we will always be in conflict with the west anyway. they are on does not count people. you need to turn off the light. there, he has a lot of statements that sometimes, when we were hurt. everyone understood belarus and russia. and why did we say it very often? he was a good logician, a good, indeed, excellent logician. zhirinovsky knew the history very well , he had an excellent education and the fact that he was a military translator and that he had everything with history on five.

it's true. this is a lot for a politician. so, this speaks of his great talent. remember zhirinovsky did not like a lot in russia. many laughed. some big high-ranking officials. hmm, they spoke with humor when he said some things, but he said, by the way, they normally walked with a representative in moscow now they called zhirinovsky's name people speak on the internet, they play his videos on the internet on youtube look at all his statements that were what he said. he said what 2/3 of the population thought, but not a single official spoke, and you know my feeling, that's a little bit missing. vladimir volfovich in these difficult situations in russia, but this is mine just a personal opinion and i agree with that. well , look at 2015. you called the ldpb the most powerful party. it was in your speech. yes, 50,000 people. i agree that the representatives of your party. i saw

in the twentieth. yes, let them be in such numbers, but most of the party organizations were not visible at all. here, in your opinion, is an experienced politician. how can you revive a party patient who is more dead than today ? you understand? i will probably say amazing things, not surprising for me, generally understandable to revive someone. them it never happened. it's all dead-created consciousness. even worse, you understand, now, uh, today, the youth should know. since 1990, the second year, i clearly show the numbers from the ninety-second year in our country after the collapse of the soviet union, well, all kinds of different amounts of funds. we did not even understand what it was about different public associations that called themselves

support, not even democracy, support. there , someone somewhere, someone, and women and children of everything, and money came from there. that's all you said, someone needs to be lifted up. these are the kept women, i don’t name them, what about the number of them, as it is fashionable in politics in our country, he says, your party can fit on the sofa, but i mean, there are parties that have these kept women. these are people for one reason or another for one reason or another for everyone. they are different, but for you to understand, there are sociological means in the republic of belarus, here are 10%, at least, at least 10% of people who can be pacifists, anyone . they will disagree not politically with one political party, nor with another. well, especially since there are people with power from this ten percent component. here are those who consider themselves to be fighters for democracy for other people's money and in no other way. you see

, they don't want to fight. e at home. so you think, is it now all of them or these, who call themselves someone. yes , no. no, it used to be in the ninety-fourth and ninety-fifth years, they all fought from abroad. what, i mean the money is coming in. grants are given out to these political parties every year. maybe you even remember this, they said, tomorrow next year there will be 100,000, then another 100,000 million will come out one amount, then less, and then the protection of our organs. the ministry of internal affairs had more than these names and the kolos cup, who remembers this? who knows? you understand. i know these people from the inside. with every sign i spoke with zenon late. this is the former leader of the belarusian movement, the liberation of the bpf party itself, appeared only in the ninety- seventh year, and before that there was a social movement. where did they enter? i know golubev sindinova. i went in the ninety-second year,

when i was working in the council of ministers acting as chairman of social protection committees. they invited me because at that time i headed the people's movement coordinating committee of the people's movement. belarus was talking to me, they said, it means sergey vasilyevich. i say it’s good, i’m diluting it on the belgorod move, don’t go, the data warehouse is food, i listen, i understand. no, no, god talk about any language i speak, whatever you want, i think, in russian we have bilingualism for me it has always existed and will exist. well, how are you, belarus, your dads. eh, here's your grandfather in all greyutkevich they say where i live, but he knows everything. you, we are together, this is russia. i say, you know, i have a completely different opinion about you and i will not name one comrade. i am belarus more than you. who your parents were born somewhere, and who you are there, i know perfectly well, so why don't you tell me. yes, my ancestors are all here in belarus.

everyone knows my grandfather, my father’s grandmother, and now i come to you to the village. in the village of karolina, by the way, my cousins ​​live there, and all my ancestors and the grave are there, so they tell them who is belarusian, who is not belarusian, i did n’t tell you how they bought me in the first presidential election 200 don’t tell. well , i'm just telling you, so that you know, they bought, as they offered 5 million. they called by phone. i can call by my last name when i was literally, when i walked goncharik and got it. the first one is 2001 . first choice. yes, there were presidential candidates gaidukevich. lukashenka at home step is filming at home now. it remains goncharik called me. on the phone, the former owner of amkodor, how is it? well, they called, in short, from poland and called from the other side. later i tried to understand by the number, they

offered me money two and a half million dollars, so that i only gave the command and they will give 2 1/2 million dollars when i write an application to the center of the election commission to withdraw. these are real facts in 2001, when they were not afraid of anyone, only with them they were given a residence permit in any country. and it is true. it's true, for sure, probably, they know and secret services did not tell me about this told me many other things when i talked to a latecomer in the ninety-ninth year, the sharetsky called me, who called me to hold an illegal referendum in the ninety-ninth year. i went through it all. we argued for a long time. eh, zenon talked for a long time , then he was behind the ribbons. history repeats itself. you correctly said that the struggle that took place in 1920 was in 1994. in 1995, no less, if not more, because then there was

alienation from the whole past, and we are in this. attitude survived, we heard insults, when the time comes. and you remember, when the ukrainian moon is what, we turn over the traffic police cars. i was there at that time. you understand that where did it all come from, and who then led the country? lukashenka and how he coped with this coped, and how a in 96, when a coup was being prepared completely through our western friends. you think it's so out of the blue gathered these oppositionists. how some communists behaved. lord yes, that only did not see. so. is this really not enough for 22 years to understand what is happening, so there is no need to revive anyone

today's political parties. i agree completely with the president i completely agree that we should at least first find out who is alive? he, you know, he said that i know two political parties. you know, i'm grateful to him not because it's true, it's true, i would still put it and look at, uh, the social movement, belarus, but, unfortunately for white russia, i would not want i am expressing my personal point of view, there is no need to make a party for officials. that's absolutely not necessary. that's all, then they will leave the state officials in this party. a little different from what a political party should be. well , okay. so all the same, it is necessary to artificially expand this one, let's say it straight. now the laws on political parties have been adopted. the constitution has been very competently introduced,

the entire belarusian assembly, but i’m just terribly pleased that this is the right thing for our decision countries. we should not copy anyone, take nothing from anyone. we just have to see for ourselves why this is needed by political parties unconditionally. it is necessary to make a proportional result system. we have a parliament of 110 people, 50 by mandate. uh, 50 for party members is necessary, but when and when it is necessary to do it in 2017, they offered it . yes, i did and now i do. and that's why it's better than just a majority system. i'm not saying it's a better question. again, if offered, then some arguments should to be. yes, understand, russia first created purely political parties, because they changed them to a majoritarian one. and proportional system. i don't think there are illiterate people in russia. they probably think gorovoy well, and i'm just saying for our country, where do i agree with the president that

we shouldn't do this? so, we need a proportional system, but we need a condition. what conditions should be not two political parties. and at least three or four normal unreal no, my reality is different. i'm talking about something else if there are no structures for a political party, so they must first be created. eh, since this is a traditional center and starts to create a party there will be 5,000 people, at least you can think of some kind of political party, and the best is 10 10,000, then. it will be a political party that will really have a representation that people will really know. you understand about this. i say, as we know the supporters of the majitar system. i agree with them. let them be. you yourself say, closer to the voter. you know all the people depends. here we are talking there will be all moneymakers. but remember the twentieth year. well, let's just not

forget about it. and i will not let anyone forget this, that all the officials, all the government officials, quickly ran. i spoke at the presidential elections in the fifteenth year it is necessary to make government officials. i will make them work. i'll make them patriots. i'll make them do the job. the one you need, what i meant, you understand the minister. he is any minister of any, that he does not have his own productions. well , take the minister of industry, he has little factories. there are large teams of eight to 10,000. and behold, that duty is only to conclude his duty in the first place. he must know as well as the director of the plant, otherwise sometimes i am surprised they look around the shop. and we have this one here. i am a minister, they should tell me where they are in this industry, that then there is no need to study the train, but the question is not that, that i understand patriotism. i understand

patriotism when the minister arrived. he has a large team of 10 people. let him talk about the topic about his theme of this plant, and then let him tell people, answer their questions, tell about the policy of the state. what are they afraid of? to tell people the truth and what happened in 1920, the president himself went to the factory, and he will remember it. i can give dozens more facts . you have to be patriots from your country, not only to people, he says, we come to people, only full-time employees. you are the governor vice-governor feminister. you are a deputy minister. be kind at your site in the ministry of agriculture, here the concerns will gather people and tell, and this will be interesting to people. yes, they will ask him with about housing about some other questions. no. it is only necessary to collect the assets of a large enterprise, set a task and leave. this is not patriotism. this is something different in russia, i can give you examples. they started doing this , and i would really like to, i would really like to and will talk about it, so that

leaders do not have to do this. i do not take all the need to pull. well, the leaders of a good level of great. and who, if not they , should be the first patriots, i subscribe to this. come on, let me ask a tricky the question is, since we remembered russia, in one source you are indicated as an exclusively pro-russian politician who demanded the introduction of the russian ruble with a single emission center, and so on in other sources you are indicated as a fervent pro- zapatnik who advocates eastern partnership and the return of the osce to minsk i will call it multi-vector in quotation marks on the one hand, but i will quote the president. yes, we thought that there is democracy in the west, english law and there are no courts there. here is the current situation. what are you for alliances? and what are they optimal for us now?