that you are climbing into those areas of truthful journalism that you used to believe like, for example, a newspaper, right in the seventieth year? but at the same time, we don’t say that we need a complete operation on our point of view and we don’t tell our viewers what to watch here is the person with whom we are talking, he speaks the honest truth, because he can also be cunning, but we simply show to look at the person , who does not, as it were, not communicate with the press. he says it's in a private conversation. this is such publicly important information, and we we give our people the opportunity to understand and think whether this really corresponds to the truth, because now i will say again that you have just listed such a huge number of media well, of course, i can also add your minister of foreign affairs to this list, who also have us several times he was quoting about information that was socially important for your republic. yeah, well,

he believed something was true, yes, some officials there also believed it. again, i’m telling the truth that mm, in general, in principle, everything can’t be perceived lately at face value. you must always treat any information critically and, of course, understand. eh, this or that action or this or that phrase is beneficial to someone. that is, not all of your conversations. eh, can also be considered authentic. but we give you the opportunity to judge for yourself how it really is, whether the interlocutor tells us the truth or not, is the interlocutor really? who is there who has a parallel informational reality that shot itself? thanks alexey we thank you for your point of view. yes irina you are most of all you most of all, how you responded to this interview. you wanted to add. i think that you have asked everything that was necessary, but that is not the point. you are speaking, but the squirrel is quoting you, the squirrel is

quoting the squirrel, the speaker is not biotasting them. if we are not dealing with a deppeke, then i'm sorry, this is purely a fake. only watching how you look from the side of the back, who asks you know about the fact that you can’t believe anything. i would say so, of course, information hygiene. we are suffering, that's for sure. well, you understand what's the matter, that's about the fakes. and san sanych spoke. here's a look for me startling at all. such a speech was made last week by mrs. analenna burbak, who said that in the russian federation, rather, during the referendum, there were a lot of people. yes, well, yes, well, blowing machine guns. this is the case with people with machine guns, they really were at the polling stations, but we perfectly understood that security was provided there, but everything else is just heresy. i listened to her and thought, where is this measure of responsibility, the minister of

foreign affairs is a concrete fake. we are this everyone understood it perfectly. everyone quotes it. i wanted to understand, she will be responsible to someone for this someday. no no, and she knows very well not only that, she says what a part of the population would like to hear, because the minimum was said in the theater book, that people do not need to commit an act. she's a walkie-talkie, let's say. so they need an excuse, so when she says this, the whole part of german society that would like it to be so, you understand. that we are doing everything right. that's what they are, not there will be no punishment. for the simple reason that with such an information flow , the next more powerful fake will overwhelm. this will immediately be an explosion on the nord stream. then something else will pass, and the information and the post-truth mode of truth but the question here is also the same. here you are a military journalist from the point of view of the belarusian state, three people who wear shoulder straps and you have commanders who, in principle, control that you don’t give out

anything mega sensational if they don’t want to, well, that’s right, well, from the point of view a normal journalist, me, yes, who can, in principle, ask sharp questions. you can’t always do this no, in fact, ask just the same questions, why is it that we started it simply by censorship, maybe we should put on shoulder straps for journalism, yes, so that they, too, would be servicemen and understand. what leads them to the word mobilized, journalists too. motivated yes, dressing the weather is probably not worth it. if, in principle, e put the question in this way. this speaks of our sick journalism. we must themselves, feeling, e traces that live the feeling of what is happening around and it is a political situation. if already the context of our program. well, here's an example i'll give 2 weeks ago it was this table, how to win this piece a lot of people. yes, he suddenly sharply. how to reflect this sensation? i

, as a journalist, told many people, or i, as a journalist, tell that someone violated the law and brought a person here. how is this to be understood? here's how and if i wore epaulettes, i would know for sure that you need this and that and that transfer. just a disappearance. let's say. so you say, kakan is very simple as soon as i learned about it from my friends. the first thing i did i called the editor-in-chief and said two calls to the ministry of emergencies ministry of health 2 and the group in this one, they say that's it. this is how you react. we're talking more about a sense of responsibility here, terribly, of course, responsibility. but if lexus lexus provokes a sense of responsibility through humor and a joke, but people now lack positive emotions. and where to get them? here in this situation? yes, because fear is just actualized. it's such a powerful emotion. what should be countered by fear? what emotion can be countered with an interview with a maniac? tell me so sobchak

interviewed a maniac. is this a show or what? here she took the people are not enough. don't be quiet. here to sobchak she knows her audience interviewed. we earn money, including here, maybe they sobchak no one reacts seriously. understand? well, an audience of a million, what are we talking about? i feel like we're really releasing hmm rather, we somehow blur the line between official journalism and the responsibility between money journalists who rivet yellow content. well, yellow content is consumed much, more willingly. you see, because in a fairy tale, believes have always been continued in just a few minutes, stay with us. it was just going to the point. we always had law enforcement agencies, you know, they were the most open, it was the law enforcement agencies that started the police,

ending the military corridor for journalists who were engaged, so to speak, on a broad agenda. it wasn't always available the speakers were probably some of the toughest there we've just spoken to. ah, for our viewers who just joined us . we have now discussed the availability of official comments. so. well, it seems like we don’t have a problem with them now, obviously. we have problems with the submission form. uh, it turns out that the classic hmm options. the media there television newspapers radio at some point our people ceased to be enough , and given how the internet developed. everyone, in principle, got the opportunity to become journalist. we will now ask our brest blogger yury uvarov to get in touch hello a. are you online in our studio today? ah. tell me, at what point did you decide, well, you yourself, to become a journalist, your youtube channel, your

telegram channel. maybe because somewhere we have not worked out the question is very incorrectly posed. the fact is that i am a journalist with thirty years of experience. uh, including more than ten years of the former tass system of the telegraph agency of the soviet union uh, so uh, if opera children is another matter. well, you're on social media. uh, and here social networks and journalism. you said how i decided to become a journalist. i became, uh, from the fifth year. i'm asking about your work on the internet and specifically voiced the question. e about your youtube channel and the telegram channel that you started. oh yes, in the twentieth year before the events. i made this decision because this niche was absolutely

practically not filled in belarus, uh, here, uh, creative realization you decided to fill this niche, what do you think, what your mind is lacking and lacking. now , have the state media conditionally eliminated, we mean now, classical ones yes, but have they eliminated the gaps that you saw then 2 years ago uh now or everything is everything as it was, it remains, what it was, it remains. uh, why uh a whole number of people appeared who do not work professionally, maybe sincerely, maybe with the best of intentions, but this is not a professional job, which, uh, today is

not very effective, is not really needed in the information war. oh, unfortunately it is. uh. listen, but there are a lot of professional journalists of television newspapers on various channels. they have now started their video blogs in the format of television programs. this applies to the stv channel, which was the ancestor, in fact. these television author's journalism, belteria radio newspaper company, belarus today. after all, they went out to people one on one face to face. this is missing. but now, in my opinion , the state does not give me enough to this process, in particular, our uh, these ideological structures. today, they do not respond adequately to the challenges of the time. therefore , what happened is happening. under an adequate

response, just let's, well, try to develop an adequate response to reason. what is it? so, there should be a system, yes , of identifying, uh, leaders of public opinion and a system of their support from the state . today, there is no such work. and i would like to cite as an example also ukraine there, this is work. more systemic is being carried out systematically, right? huge on the internet in belarus unfortunately, this is not all happening the enthusiasm is hermetically sealed maine thank you very much for your opinion, but i wouldn't say

that we don't have it, after all, last week we talked in the program about the fact that, in principle, we even have information troops. we just don't talk about it . again, referring to the same given, they say, in fact, in fact, not all. we even journalists knew who milana khametova was, because my son explained to me, he also told us, but still, we probably have people, including, as i was told, fourteen-year-olds guys who somehow work on the internet, or i'm delusional. let's start from the other side, first of all, my opinion. i think that it will be supported by all of our audiences present, you can’t get hung up on something. here the internet is good. there are no questions, but the internet must be understood that this is not our platform at the moment, we do not agree. by the way, i'm done. let me finish, this is our struggle on the internet but on someone else's let's

just say, but that's another matter. here is the second point. why do you write off television or radio head of the tv channel one target the audience in television is one thing very skeptical; the second moment is print media; they also have their own audience; the third moment. today, behind the scenes, i said that i was outraged by the food through the capital of our state. passing by the palace of the republic and the huge beautiful bright caviar stopped in a traffic jam, i looked, i saw a girl in a cutie bra. i saw there praise the hands that

smell of information i really like, let's say the news is up to 90 seconds. clearly fast it's clear that you understand, the target audience is indeed a different classical media watched and read by one audience the internet will be another audience. you have to work for all this work. absolutely right, you probably already looked at our body to pay attention to whether we want it or not, but we need to give ourselves a clear attitude and understanding that several generations have already grown up. that's how you talk in the internet space. yes, and they it is quite possible that they don’t watch tv at all, but this does not mean that we should not work in this direction, what is called gluing these two worlds and uh, the sooner and, uh, the more intensively we will begin to promote our information products in that direction and establish such a connection. yes, in the form of a game it doesn't matter. in anything, but for a growing audience. this will be

a signal for some action. there they want to press just one button and get information, but is our opponent an adversary or an enemy? we haven't decided yet. how to interpret it correctly, and they did it a long time ago by means of. eh, literally a person opens his thoughts already from the category of what he says nearby, he reads information. you still start talking about the internet, but even take, for example, the time of the nineteenth twentieth year, when everyone was talking about television, it died, the internet is the future of television, the internet is dead, but now you have become a tv presenter from a blogger quite right. yes, on the contrary, i would like to say that, uh, he has a share of veracity, if i may say so, then of course it belongs, of course, to television. yes , the outpost was delivered to. yes, i am honestly opponents,

including extremist resources, like since tv people are reposted. i no longer take, of course, the context that they pack. now, even during this live broadcast, cpson is watching with a pencil, well, the author's headings on stv are constantly present on their tv screens. we are constantly on them on the agenda. they quote grigory azarenka, they quote our economic news. all this is visible. that is, we well, how they turn this information sometimes so it is beneficial for them. and we use it the way we need it and we tell the truth, everything is different from yellow journalism and from the fact that do we e, which are regulated by the law of the media, the most important thing.

is there or does everyone like to be deceived? well, it 's more interesting to live. well, that's interesting. i would like attention that at the moment i, uh, want to continue my thought, what we need to find, as the president said, is the interaction between officials. i apologize for such a word, of course, the mass media, so as not to create this vacuum, probably where fakes are born, when the fantasy factory works - this is one story, but both methods of work are about the same thing that is scattered bloggers. and how do you collect them, or what? maybe, indeed, somehow collect stas well, you ate from the blog, you tried earlier experimenting with something like that. uh, let's say organize a community like that, it's really not like that. it's just that if a blogger, if we are talking about a blogger, a journalist, uh, a tv presenter, these are slightly different things. yes, responsibility is zero zero, in

fact, but individuality, but yes, individual cooperation with each blogger is one thing. for example, i have to raise who i cooperate with and through him convey their agenda, but if they are, relatively speaking, but appear on television, then, well, obviously the audience has a new person in the twentieth. the second was bloggers appear many have gone. many remained about that, he was talking about exactly this, that the enemy uses just this technology, he tested it and uses all those, uh, who appear on the screen on the other side, let's say the planet. yes, these are all people who are defined. the way they are connected is funded. they are involved in various projects. they're pumping, yeah some specific information with theses and pushes the viewer. maybe this is the connection to catch him, we can say that this is quite an independent person with an independent opinion. yes, no one knows how the

position sounds, an aristocratic, in fact, however, everyone knows it. it's the same story. that's all, maybe a request for new faces. now it can take right here and update it, and in our media field about new faces, in general. uh, why is the request fake? why do people not believe so for a very long time the internet taught, but to be interested in love and thus replaced reality with fantasies, and fantastic literature. after all, she can be attracted by this with quick access, as if the truth, that is, it can be, but on the internet you could find something young people could find , and children were brought up. children's age and therefore brought up several generations who believe in the internet and they consider the internet to be this scientific library where you can find truthful information, and they were accustomed to cartoons, games, some interesting films and music, that is, their through the game through emotions. maybe we

really need censorship. here is the soviet union. i am returning to the past. there was the first second television program, a radio station, a newspaper, true, we received information from good soviet films from good soviet cartoons and knew for sure that igor kirillov would not lie when he came out on the screen. well, you understand that the lives of others really need censorship, firstly, it understands well, in fact. she will probably need to understand here what we mean by the word censorship. i understand, if we are talking about location. here, yes, if a child is brought up without restrictions, that is , he has no boundaries, then he turns out to be. with life, because he does not know what is possible and what is impossible. we now have censorship, 18 + 6+, that is, we have an age restriction on access to information, but we can only limit what we own, and unfortunately the internet. yes, this is not our tool, i absolutely

agree with you, so you need to work with their methods, it is not necessary to invite bloggers to the tv screen. let them work in this environment. let them be affiliated and non-essential with official funds. i’m talking about this about an individual ava , it’s clear to work, but since the vars talk about it, it’s time, well, whatever, they say, tell them about information, maybe it’s worth teaching people this information hygiene to learn how to work with information sources to compare and protect yourself from unnecessary sources, because they get us to tell. in the west, they teach how to work with information hygiene so it happened, but e lucky can be said and he graduated from the bundeswehr academy of information communication in berlin, that is, he just spied on how they teach. eh, so let's say fight us. here, and most importantly, it was a very intensive course from 8:00 am sometimes

until 10 pm. uh, they really taught up to which eye to look at the camera, but this is not the most important thing here. the key thing is that they integrated into the head into the heads of the students , these were primarily german officers, but completely different cities of the troops. eh, and even civilians. this gave the concept of information work systems throughout germany, both in the army and throughout germany and the people. e approximately understood that when where why they should be connected in the information field to work. what i’m talking about is that sometimes the shoulder straps of a journalist should be in every person in every journalist, that’s why i’m talking further, but this is not, but let’s say censorship, and if we extrapolate, then what i just said on the situation here on the mobilization of our then, uh, this would mean that not only journalists, but i mean the e-education system here in germany confrontation. uh, not only journalists would be connected to this situation, but let's say, the director of the enterprise, whose employees are called

to the training camp. he would have immediately contacted the seven-seater, who would have been told about these workers. uh. kostya look, look, we got such an amazing story. you are saying everything right, but at the beginning of the nineties we were driven into the head that watering classes is bad propaganda - this is a bad radio station. this is bad. and all this, what you are talking about, works in germany simply, because it should work there, but we don’t should be in the first grade, it cannot be heard in the classroom, but in america these same technologists may be opposition to ours. it’s sad to believe the official information, they tried to do this for decades, and they succeeded well, but at the same time, i’ll pay attention to the attentive viewer, a long time ago they should have drawn the obvious conclusions for themselves, well, suppose the most famous here is this fake with colin powell with a test tube. yes, when he

hypocritically rubs her face. e, s, stribon, so after that the army went. here went the iron. well, the army has gone, no study, army. just ordered. they went. many of them don't even know who power horse is. well, let's start with this. 17 our aul has prepared a public opinion on this matter. the period of the twentieth year, when a part of the population believed that it was true, only on the internet in certain telegram channels, but after a while, when emotions subsided, when a person had a general opportunity to figure it out and try to figure it out. well, those who think they are or two plus two and realized that they were deceived once deceived two deceived, and not turned on. yes tv watching. after august 2020, it has grown, of course, and you, too, have grown a lot on your youtube audience in belta, but if the people come, it means they want to see this truth. yes, i can tell you that here is listening to

all this discussion. i wanted to say that we are talking, of course, about very important things, but in general changes in society. this must begin with each of us. and if we want society to change, we ourselves must change. there is such a very good phrase. uh, sometimes people accept their shortcomings because of the shortcomings of society and start to remake cities at a time when it is necessary to remake themselves. what do i mean? that in order for something to change, we have to plow , undress and work. so you say the audience has grown. yes, but trust me. we work much more. yes there were 100,000 subscribers. that is, this morning there were seven 777.000 and viewing. colossal, but we started to apply other technologies, you know, we started doing this titling, we translate from english into german and we we understand that content that has not been seen abroad before by our president has not been seen abroad. and now they can this content is incomprehensible. look, there is some

content and two. uh, about twenty percent. whose it is more likely to watch the credits? this means that it is not belarusians who are watching. the germans are watching. you see, the americans are watching, the poles are watching. we see who is watching it, that is, everything is for what, we can talk a lot about some very complex things, but we just have to work on our workers places. i know for sure. here are the people who are, they are burning. well, you want to say that all 100% come from nine, some turn on the computer at nine at their workplaces mark at six and do not turn it off at six kirill vladimirovich six the office door is already closing. so the president said that comrades. you are working. this is how we work, since three years ago, but the time has changed, so the test today is not just a tv set, it is also the same and the same internet in general, i can’t say that we we don't change. yes, we now have a live broadcast on youtube and the tv channel is growing and there is an external translation. but if we talk about

the stv website, then it is externally a perimeter, as soon as we open, let’s say, the collective smell is immediately attacked, they all don’t want to let us in there, they understand that we have the truth and they don’t just block us. this is all understandable and our bloggers are cut out by our authors, but we will work in this regard anyway. but uh, of course it's nice that the english-speaking population is also watching us in germany. and where is more important? in my mind than what she thinks somewhere out there, what's going on with us. 3 is this how we win our audience, because a has lost faith in, let's say, extremist telegram channels, or has your viewing increased? yes, we have a visit , but it has increased even more. i understand perfectly well that he is today, right? you

said it right, a lot of people reorganized and understood, so we see it, even by the numbers here. well, we don’t invent all these views on stv youtube channels in august and september. well, almost 60. there are 70%. and this, including our internal perimeter, and there, most importantly, they didn’t laugh. this is president alexander and add, of course. and it seems to me that to fight for the audience. we must all fight for the audience. we are talking about the fact that the negative is such a more magnificent animation, and for the viewer yes, and they actually searched for it in alternative sources. you are talking about the fact that the president is the most watchable in our country, but schmeiker is a person who, in principle, speaks, because criticism, most often, probably, in our country comes from the mouth of the president fair criticism. to certain people. so maybe it makes sense to increase the amount of hmm critical materials. who's stopping us? here

again, who should be the constructive construction of the critic. here i am in one person, as a consumer of information, as a source of information. and as an educator , a bit of a provider of information, well, as a source of information, it means, well, listening to you, you know, informational mercantilism. but tell me, please, did anyone think to do three to five minute blocks. on the internet, so that the teacher can come to think, i will tell you that one, two. we are now talking about conquest. uh, it is necessary to conquer the audience from the school bench. the next moment. those who are already on the high school bench, there are 14-15 years old, yes, well, they say, remember, and so on and so on, it is also necessary to work with them, and maybe

, maybe, well, as an example, a successfully unsuccessful example. er, well, the military system. there is information, there are views of news broadcasts in the evening. whether you like it or not, you have to watch. i said, journalism should be chasing journalism. this is not a journalist. i also want me to be in berets. well, the next moment is a very simple moment. hey, there's a new addition. they are shown a movie by 28 panfilovites, at that time it was a very fresh film, quite interesting and instructive. here. eh, after watching i ask a question i liked the film i liked it, well, i say, if i walked past the cinema with a girl and saw a poster, i would go

in. patriotism again. this is an element. this is an integral part of what we must do with our population. in our children, patriotism should be brought up for our country, love is blood. would n't they come into this cinema young people, because they need something else, they don't need scary, both about war and about death. they also need to join the army , he looked at it. look, he was saturated with a certain thing, i can express again one more such thought, as he says all the peppers are one. here, look. the leader always has two tasks. the first task is to set this task. and the second is to control the mouth. we now have only one story to set a task for the country. we don't control it. we

are holding dialogue platforms. we show films. we go, for example, classes to the museum somewhere else, but we do not control in any way, we do not ask. so you say you asked, and for the most part, right? by example, i can say after the dialogue platforms. nobody talks about it people, really. everyone understands the information they read , they watch youtube, they understand what we convey to them and we do it, but we don’t control, and at this level we have an abyss. it's my personal opinion. do you know what else is the problem of working with young people, teachers, they don’t. this is the task to control, namely, they could do it, in general, the most important profession. yes, the people who shape society create the next generation. these are the teachers. and i'll tell you that this is a school . and this is how they work. i am until 6:00 i will take advantage, so to speak, of an official

position, but a personal one. yes, we celebrated teacher's day this weekend. i, of course, first of all, i congratulate my most important teacher. this is my mother and a are just such a person who works with children in first grade. yes, elementary school. so , she just says a lot about the fact that there really are problems and there are questions. well, with the internal motivation of teachers, in principle, very special people choose this profession, those who, probably, are just a vocation, but not those who come to stand, roughly speaking, at the machine tool and their mood of those or others know pedagogy more than those who came calling, because that there is no big money, but indeed, the profession of a teacher has become not very prestigious in our country. just like the military profession, and once in soviet times, a girl did not marry guys who did not serve in the army. why because if they didn't join the army, it's a marriage, but it was so yes, that is, well, not a good

man. that's how i thought. and now, that is, once it was prestigious to marry a military man, we must remember why and also here to support teachers and the status of a teacher in society, these are professions. he is for what it is also formed about this. we must remember, because teachers influence society, and the military protects it. he us now the situation is such that we need protection. we all understood this. now wait look at the military and at the military uniform. you know, we already have a program in a row, but we come to the conclusion that one word is not indifferent? yes, as soon as we stop being indifferent to what we are doing and begin to look a little further, do a little more to try. well, for the common cause, no matter how pathetic it is sounded, but in fact for ourselves we also live in this country and in this world i hope in the world.

hello taboo on mediation marketing shock loopholes, import prices tough fundamental discussion of the situation in the consumer market took place in the independence palace will tell you the details. tomorrow the president of belarus will make a working visit to st. petersburg, where he will take part outside the formal summit of the heads of state of the cis members