let's just say the events were studied and hmm the history of the criminal investigation department. in general, we talked with veterans and met, and uh. well, even before, probably, the celebration of the centenary, the future position of the head of the criminal police of the frunzensky district department of internal affairs of the capital. i talked with those veterans who told me about the organization of work since that time, but only the formation of this frunzensky district department of internal affairs, that is, about that one and a half that was for the entire district department of internal affairs in the post-war years. yes, which they went to, of course, the borders of the districts were not in those borders that we are talking about today, but uh, nevertheless, about the number of criminal investigation officers, there are eight people, 12 or when it was a criminal investigation group and so on, but about hmm changes in crime. well, they probably said, uh, already in advance, so the question. yes , of course. everything is leaving, high technologies are crimes that hmm are generally

committed on the internet. yes, the same there are various kinds of insults, threats, uh, that are committed well through the internet and hmm in such an absolute majority of faces, who committed them. by the way, they are installed quite often, but for one reason or another. uh, while e is unable to detain them , given that they are outside the republic of belarus, because, well, the worldwide global network allows itself to, uh, use its capabilities, being in any country in the world. well, naturally. thank you very much for a very interesting conversation. i hope that with your help, with the help of all law enforcement officers, our street will always be calm. thank you thank you

we are going to explore new routes and

laying new paths for the droya is a city-museum. there is just a little bit left and crowds of tourists will go here. start yourself admiring the unusual landscapes. olshansky castle, the residence of a magnate family, sapegal 16-17 years old. i am the housekeeper of my takeaway to guide you to the walls of our castle. pay attention to the tower clock. they are not typical for orthodox architecture money. the parishioners themselves gathered for them. let's stop in small towns and learn their history. initially, the town consisted of only one street. it branched out in the area repi merge, reminded. the square is the so -called city center to imagine, but this building on lenina 14 is the building of the railway station. travel with us to belarus 24. wonderful jump

hard natural wealth of belarus shmatem prostrate, you can joke the outline here is in the ball in the lake at the bottom of the stray called god's wok, naming the lake tore off its obrysam. what are the wok in maya lake, the shape of the correct circle yakaya does not change on the stretch of debts, there are chances on the far side that the wok sorshits behind the right of people from heaven and shoot them such ball chandeliers in belarus hello, my name is ivanovsky alexander vladimirovich i am a doctor of technical sciences, a professor i teach at the academy of the ministry of internal affairs and at the academy of management. today we will talk about national security and, first of all, about the information security of our society. hello

, on the air, the program, say, do not be silent in the studio, victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and alexander ivanovsky is visiting us today, good afternoon. hello, glad to see you. thank you very much vladimirovich you are one of the developers information security concept. let's start with it on september 28, the ministry of defense of belarus announced a check of the combat and mobilization readiness of a military unit in urinals. and after that, a panic appeared on the network that this was probably connected with the mobilization that is taking place in russia. as you comment on this, i will comment on your statements in stages. one of the developers. it was made by a large team, almost everyone is interested and prepared for this people. so, of course, i sing it. it was caused by significant

changes in the field of information security, let's say, and i want to say, if we look at the trends that have been happening lately, then cybersecurity has grown 10 times against the general background, of course, it puts pressure on all spheres, both social and political and other spheres. by the way, i want to say that the level of organized crime in this area of ​​crime is growing by cybercrime. this means that in the republic, our detection rate has increased by 25% , relatively more difficult than the problem with the fact that applies to us and abroad. well, in our society, we feel almost every day there are advertisements that you do not respond to these proposals, questions that have it, starting with small things. and, of course, questions related to a higher level and therefore here. of course you have to keep your ears open. now our concept of national security is being revised, including the sphere of information of these things. well, what

you said, the second part with the question of what happened at one of the events that were chosen in as an informational occasion. eh, certain actions were unfolded, which, by the way, are quite periodic for a long time. constantly thrown into our society, then, i think, this is another such duck, or, as the americans said, yes, they sat under cranberries and drank tea. in fact, the whole idea of ​​management is primarily based on, i mean, informational and psychological, so that a person finds himself in a state of stress, and therefore a number of influences that are through networks, by the way, and through a number of channels, which, including ours, are aimed hidden at loosening. e to undermine the authority, first of all, a feeling of insecurity and it is not at all necessary that the name of our leaders was indicated there. but everything that is done is all bad. the general background is, yes. although if you look, here's our let's say the result of the work.

well, look, here our leaders spoke, by the end of the year a growth of 3.5% of the gross domestic product is expected. it seems to me that this is, well, a very serious result against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in the world, not every country. can be proud of this business, but nothing about it in the networks about the fact that there are a lot of possible, but you know unfriendly networks. well, first of all, of course. we need to define two e segments. so we will call all those who, well, they are often called state. in fact, this is not always the state for the channel. and the second group is, which is essentially anti- state, which means that the situation is complex and tense, as bill gates once said about the situation in computer technology, he also wants nerves and, of course, the society should be collected and the introduction of various

themes leading away from the idea of ​​cohesion of societies, its association around common goals. in what all groups. it is, of course, carefully undermined, eroded, which means, well, liquefied, let's say. so. well, in order for some kind of anxiety to hang in the air, and then it is much easier to control the mass in the air, of course, anxiety. she just hangs on me. it is rampaging there, the head of our state spoke and he clearly expressed his positions on a number of issues and in relation to those events that are taking place on ukraine and in relation to our internal policy and regarding partial mobilization in russia, he he just uttered the phrase that our military should pay attention and not repeat mistakes, take into account, even russian mistakes in the sense that you understand, firstly . you look at the meeting at the meeting, not only the military, but all the security forces were present. this is our new concept, when we mean we have, uh, total defense,

when all power structures are involved. everyone has their own piece and it is constantly said that you are doing your own thing. as for which you are responsible, by the way, these are recommendations for everyone and instead of scolding the high authorities there, not having enough information to do this business. and, of course, it's simple, but there is a lot of information that partial mobilization in russia went badly. well, bad. and let's say ukrainians made mistakes in the spring. we bought additional technical means for conducting propaganda. in ukraine , they quadrupled the contingents in their social networks. moreover, the feed was not frontal indirect and they show only negative. that is, we can see positive pictures on official channels, and they are trying to suppress the number of mass

ones to show that everyone is against this mobilization of margarita simonyan, we can no longer suspect that she was involved in these channels purchased by ukrainians, so she understood private. eh, they say that mistakes were indeed made. well , first of all, i want to comment on the specialist doctor and our president neatly said, but you understand that he is holding such an event. how to summon 300,000 people. this is not possible without errors. in general, i am opposed to assessing the actions of the russian authorities, because, well, firstly, there is not enough information. secondly, they have their own society in their system of organization. we need to dive deeper into ourselves nothing prince. we are asking. what are the lessons for us. it's my opinion. eh, the idea of ​​what is needed specifically. they call on people to act on the subpoenas, check them for availability, show what he will do.

in the case of certain actions, its degree of readiness is assessed in order to obtain not a massive effect, but to obtain the effect of a point specific for specific cases. inspect, but as in dagestan, let's say they organized it. e, and even the leader of this region of dagestan was indignant. and when the car drove through the streets and loudly, speak loudly from the speaker, the phrase was heard saying that all men should come to the recruiting stations. let's focus on our country. well, what are we going to criticize the russians, moreover, they made conclusions about this we criticize. we want to understand how to avoid their mistakes. well, firstly, we are very actively looking at what is being done on the sides and trying to minimize all these mistakes. it is clear that mistakes cannot be avoided at all. well, you have to stick to the target. well, we have scale and therefore a different approach to this matter a little bit, i think i understand your idea. it

consists in the fact that you will receive a summons, then worry, yes, but in advance, escalate the situation until we should. well, i want to talk about agendas. after all, it's not a secret that a number of our databases are located outside and receiving. here are such hangings by mothers about, for example. you will choose if your son is killed in ukraine with an apartment or money, it, of course, does not contribute, as it were, to psychological stability. we are responding to this matter by working with these people by categories of certain public organizations. well , in short, for each fact, it is necessary to specifically understand and see what conclusions can be drawn . i will clarify one more point. here, watch us. neighbors on both sides are watching now. sides, these are both ukrainian and russian residents. and everyone writes about the same thing in belarus, which is still quiet, that is. well, you understand that in this there is a through and envy, maybe

some, because god forbid to be in such a situation. what do you think about this ? whom should we thank that it is still quiet in belarus, but firstly i want to say, so we are also watching them, judging by your words. we have a very clear idea of ​​what they are talking about and there are words not only related to envy, but quiet. well, uh, provocative calls for a push to get us in there. i think that a significant degree of our situation is connected with the interaction between putin and lukashenko, that is, they have very clearly defined the roles and participation of each. in this process, well , yesterday the head of state said that our task is to ensure that the northern part does not have additional impacts on the same ukraine. well, i would like to draw your attention to the fact that there are not so many forces of both sides there, and let's say the involvement of belarus is still additional approximately 2,000 km along the border, if there

take filters and this part, which also needs to be covered and done with something. well, taking into account the fact that, let's say a significant contingent of military forces in poland, let's say they work in ukraine, then specialists get there, too, let's say, so combat experience, then for now. the washington regional committee decision made no resources for this. i think that there is still a resource limitation, the second point that the head of state has also managed to achieve as a result of our actions. he said the troops withdrew directly from the border. i mean for outside the republic of belarus directly yes. it's not far, of course. yes, it’s like, but nevertheless they moved away from our immediate territory for the third moment. i believe that we have a fairly high degree of internal stability. i think economic well, let's say the same agricultural company. that is,

i also have a huge work to grow such a crop. take an industry that has sold products by moving them to other markets. well , and so on and so on at the minsk tractor plant, even the staff raised salaries recently. well, i think this is just due to the increase in sales, which is. well, in addition, this is the same policy that the state is pursuing to increase wages. well, of course, in the table of all the possibilities that exist, of course, there are people who believe that it is necessary to live better, but in order to live better, you need to work harder. if taking into account the fact that the gap is almost now happening. rearmament. but we are not alone. look at our neighbors to the west poles they have 25% goes to defense 25%. usually hmm trump asked for three feel, that is, what kind of dynamics, why is our leadership concerned, because the tendency to impose

a more powerful creation of a more powerful group by rearming a qualitative one is, of course, negative in itself, as for today, of course, the great merit of all sides is that until we were brought in, here in this, here is a very heavy stopper. well, i think that here you understand the whole combination of factors and the failures of the twentieth year and an attempt at a certain, so to say, here is our rethinking of all those situations that were, well, the big state administration bodies do not work at all , we started with the fact that belarus is not immune from information attacks, like all other countries. naturally. let's remember what alexander lukashenko said recently to journalists during a meeting in khatyn. the war is underway along the line of information and psychological operations. what is

the difference between our now and our future. e with what they do. they have all this based on fakes on the screen should not be open lies, you know, initially should be true, because if a fake after a while. it will still become a property, therefore, the basis must be facts. concrete facts are on the table, and you are already raising them, interpret as you see fit, this should be the difference between these operations from our side with all the fake operations that they carry out, and what other than the classic strategy here are the facts on the table. what other effective measures of protection against information attacks would you advise ? here we have whole a number of participants and electoral companies. remember our company was telling the truth. so, well, firstly, burglary, the words of vladimirovich lenin tell the truth

were used and the authors did not stick out their company. indeed, if there is trust in the authorities, then it is, of course, either in one group or another, then this is a very powerful social and political resource. this means that the second point that should be said is that while emotional arousal, it sort of defocuses the picture and contributes to impact on citizens of this or that information, the third moment, which you are talking about, is again inertia, that is, the twentieth year has passed, the people actually moved away after about six months only from this overexcited state, because, well, i believe that in in our country, the average level is quite high, for example, i don’t like the phrase ordinary belarusians and private journalists. i believe that we are all belarusians and we have a fairly high overall level. true,

it is possible as a method prompted by all practical decisions that must make know that do hairdressers and taxi drivers, but they, unfortunately, do not sit in power. maybe they would be excellent managers if they had all the information, and why it is so necessary to listen carefully, from my point of view, the speech of the head of state is complete. the information is complete information, with regard to these fakes here, well, some destabilizing facts of small mud smearing each other. this is an attempt to denigrate society, and so that we lose self-confidence, but i can’t say that all our problems have been sorted out even after twentieth year. that is, some of the people have not decided to the end with it, some say now, it has calmed down, the part has not calmed down, it is trying to rethink. and, of course, there are people who do not perceive certain things, but in general, of course, rethinking is observed that

there are questions that create a very different question, which means that the methods of struggle that you know, it seems to me that if all the time to say, there is a confrontation with a confrontation. these are measures of patriotism in proportion to the amount of labor invested moreover, we even like the word patriotism. eh, we have it here, as the preparation for the constitution showed, uh, we interpret it quite broadly. well , the same ones. take representatives of, say, a nationalist intellect. they also believe that they are patriots of belarus, we should talk more about citizenship and the relationship of a person to the state. i think including, of course, having patriotism. that is, this moment, well, to define it more clearly, because here a person is speaking, saying, i love belarus but i don’t really like the state, just as the state was not created so that you would love it, it is created so that

we don’t have chaos, that is, a very definite restriction is imposed. and here, too, especially, for example, propaganda is said there. all the time you are right, but somehow you would be obliged to do nothing, and duties should, of course, be, but at least in the first place duties, and then, of course, the ensuing difficulties. i may understand a little what does not suit people who are hiding or those who left, i recently read the remark of my friend in social networks that he himself is russian and says that both in ukraine and in russia there is some kind of relaxation. well, freemen all the time, as it were, more opportunities, and in belarus , i write and quote against this background, most of the time it resembles a military unit before the visit of the commander-in-chief. i've lived in military camps and i know what i'm talking about. do you agree that, firstly, you served for 30 years, you can imagine what a main visit is. i think that such an atmosphere

would be acceptable for us today, because we are in very difficult situation. and so we must be collected. now i will give your quote, as if in confirmation. discipline is required of us in the current situation , your words are discipline in that you are responsible specifically for your area, and do not think about the universe and do not give smart advice advice in a number of cases is given from a good wish, but there is not enough information. after all, when making a decision, you need to have the maximum amount of information, and not treatable and quite clear. and here is the absence of this information. by the way, here are these destructive channels. it’s like they throw in additional pads like this, yes, additions that just take us away from the essence, in principle, we have, if we look at our current system, then, of course, we achieve the first main goal policy with them. e, the president determines and in no way lukashenka although he is lukashenka

a as an official who has all the power and information as well. and so he sets these tasks. and so, when you make a decision in your place. you also need to fit into the general policy of the state and see the goals that it sets for itself, if you see that you are being told that this is generally, as if perpendicular to the wrong direction at all. you have to get rid of this stuff somehow. well, the second point. it seems to me that everyone should decide how he will behave in case of complication of the situation. i spoke there in one audience, and my friend told me that we did not understand what was happening. and interestingly, the women did not speak, and the men just started to twitch about this, it’s clear yes, at that moment i could very harshly say that, after all, if the situation escalates, we will fight, we will all fight and we must

decide, if you don’t want, well, please, while there is an opportunity. run there to georgia to poland or wherever you want? only there happiness, no. because happiness, just think i agree with you. let's discuss. this later, after a short pause, i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. suggest guests. we are in touch on the air again, say the program, do not be silent. and today, our guest, professor alexander ivanovsky, we will continue what we began to discuss in the first part, in case of emergency, our population imagines how to behave or not. we have already discussed this topic in this studio more than once with our guests. opinions are different, so to speak, of course. because life is different, different people express their point of view and the concept itself is ambiguous. that is, how to behave. in

fact, of course, there are certain plans, mobilization and actions that have them enshrined. supported by legislative documents, on july 15 last year, a decree was signed, which, as it were, introduced new concepts, firstly, what is an emergency, what is a military situation, changes were made to the legislation , there are certain plans, according to which it would be necessary to organize body of action of certain individuals in this situation, with regard to the total population of complete working off. there's a nuclear danger alarm. if god forbid approaches, then, of course, such exercises will probably be carried out to work out what is on the other hand has increased significantly. for example, we have specialists at school who prepare children for action according to the situation. we are with alexei belyaev. they also touched on this issue and talked about what was once back in our childhood in our school years. there were

straight lessons. that is, certain actions were brought to automaticity. that is, not just tell or show people. it is to engage and conduct classes. so i i want to say that such classes are held in educational institutions of the republic of belarus, the same thing happens in other organizations. here, look, your colleague alexander shpakovka offers, and enter the appropriate account with the opportunity to undergo retraining in the field of military affairs and receive primary medical skills. well, a number of other proposals to put forward. what do you think the primary skills girls got at school. secondly, over this case, very strongly. are they working these skills? you know i can to say, maybe from my own experience, i have four formations and somehow you forget everything, but when the need arises, that is, it really pops up from memory, it is pulled out by itself. well, i agree that, probably, these things could be strengthened to some extent, call for them, especially since now, as if in this head

of state, he said that women, perhaps, will be specialists involved. uh, work on military studies. specialties, but i'm opposed to dramatization, please note. what the political leadership of the country gives us the guidance, the situation is complex and tense, but without dramatization no dramatization of it here we have the main message, and the message is that people be ready, that they just be calm, and knowing that if necessary . they know how to behave. we have only authorized people who are responsible for this matter, there are appropriate plans that are being implemented. so it could be massive . it's not happening. well. uh, a massive impact on the population, but all these activities are being worked out for two years. ago, highlighting the main points of alexander lukashenko’s message, you noted that belarus has concrete proposals to reduce tension in the region, what

is happening now with our neighbors makes me think that they never defiantly listen to us now. well , firstly, i would note in this sense the speech of our minister of foreign affairs. makeev out. so, where our proposal was brought to all participants of this session, really western, so to speak, here is the ansaxon group. she is not very looks at us and we need to understand where decisions are made decisions are not made in lithuania, i'm not in poland despite them being there. suffering megalomania greatness and they are accepted all the same, uh, across the ocean and in britain means, if we look at the desire - this is the desire to create, from the sea, to the sea there is a grouping. and by the way, speaking of what their slogan is, the idea is that europe without russia, germany under europe and europe under the usa, such a model exists

today and actions. there, agreed-upons are not accepted in the center. and therefore, well, let's say even our very big sworn, friends, lithuanians are the current leadership. i apologize so much that maybe i call them, they can raise various initiatives, but all the same they are controlled from above, even in a number of cases. they run ahead of the engine and are stopped. i mean lithuanians. suppose even an attack on us is the involvement of the entire nato is ready. that means surgery. this is also not an easy moment, so here is the model that is now chosen without russia in the west germany under europe because germany is the main the most powerful yes, and the third part is, of course, eh. from above to the american, well, of course it happens. now, on the eve of the

first world war, all historians said that there was a sharp increase in military budgets, in principle, trump began to raise this part of europe, we support it to a large extent and were rich, because our armed forces did not finance enough, but the records that they beat you understand, 25, there and the neighboring state is also not big enough figures for these budgets. i don't want to just call because uh, this is a powerful blow to the social obligations that are there. and, of course, one cannot fail to say that all the words are about democracy, and even more so in the conditions when the world went to disperse. of course they take a backseat. how are you? explain here the ability of the anglo-saxons to make the whole world dance to their tune. here we are now celebrating every time that they are so they are well done they are this is what they have such a plan. well, that is, everything they do turns out that well done. we

are suffering from this case. we are watching them. and what is it connected with? well, firstly, of course, it is connected with the tradition, which is colonial traditions, very rich in tradition, because britain is acceptable. she ruled the whole world and the slogan divides the power. they borrowed from roman times those that were. secondly, from time to time, after all, an island is an island where there are rich minerals, especially there were no resources, and therefore it is their strong point to develop such a political one. here is the strategy of the doctrine, which was and in the end . after all, essentially. they always tried somehow to annoy russia of the russian empire there to push to make it traceable. now here we can just say that our information work is dominated by the historical approach of a very large number of historians. connected, they say they look through these traditions after some

certain years and so on. well, of course, this allows us to identify common features of preparation for those events that were britain has vast experience in conducting work on the division of article 130 of the criminal code of the republic of belarus means division into groups dismemberment along various lines of social religious ethnic and so on and so on and these seams are under attack. and what are we, why are we sleeping, if we know that it has already formed? see three groups that pose some kind of danger and wait for the hour and x, roughly speaking , on august 20, for these groups to show themselves in all their glory. well, firstly, we do not wait, that is, a whole complex of well- defined actions is being done. secondly, nature does not like leaps. that is, as soon as you start making revolutionary events. it's an immediate crash and for a long time. you will have to restore at least what you have, and therefore, if you pay attention to our approaches to eliminating the events of the twentieth year,

it is still being done enough. you can say smoothly. i once heard here in one speech that the bolsheviks have been in their seventeenth year, which means that human rights have been interrupted there . what human rights during the revolution should we move away from this nightmare that has been coming out of this situation for years, and therefore, of course, our government is trying to act in an evolutionary way. well, what people have different points of view, but also has always been. why are we saying that it somehow happened unexpectedly in our country? people had and will have different points of view. the main idea is consolidation around a single goal. and now it is completely clear to us. this will preserve the republic of belarus in its current form, about the dramatization of events, that it is not worth dramatizing something again. here is an example , the times reports that putin may conduct a nuclear test in the black sea. that

is, the british in this case dramatize situation, but the british were the first to start, that is, their wonderful leader of the country drilled out about this. by the way, no one asked her. it was as if in the process of her election campaign, as far as i understand, she wanted to show that she is such a fairly strong woman. it's true. and it gave birth to a kind, a whole wave. uh, voicing opinions estimates about this whole thing. there is one thing here that seems to be not observed the first time. after all. pay attention, if when they made it a bomb shelter, then the whole thing was considered, that nuclear war. it's the end of the world, everything ends, now it's propaganda , but it's not so scary. that's some small ammo. here in one place, the sea, everything will perish. no one can say what the numbers will be, because well, take at least two real hiroshima in nagasaki, there were

twice as many losses due to the fact that the weather was different , the wind was different, the terrain was different, and so on. that is, these figures are very estimated. i want to pay attention. that's what is going gradually. it means, as it were, propaganda to promote the idea that nuclear weapons are not so scary that it is possible to use small ones. well, only, but only in the black sea, you understand, destruction is allowed in what? that is, it is generally the idea of ​​lowering our legal tolerance. excuse me, i ’ll choose such a term, but in relation to the use of nuclear weapons, as for the russians, they were very clear , they said yes, we have a doctrine. we have established lines, and we will use them when the need arises. moreover, the poles pushed back that our slots, because the head of our state clearly announced our aviation forces are capable of carrying nuclear

weapons. we brought them transformations and if necessary. that is, of course, to a large extent, nuclear forces are forces of deterrence. i would like to draw attention to the fact that there are searches for influence through other channels. this means that this is ecological safety, this is all sorts of biological ones. here are the studies that are currently being conducted in ukraine in particular. it is, after all, these epidemics. not in vain in the concept of our new introduce a whole section related to the fight against infections with all sorts of transgender cases and so on, as one of the elements of national security. here is the question that you were waiting for. i would single out for myself this. this is fundamental, that is, an attempt to show that nuclear weapons are not like that. well, it was destroyed only in the black sea. it doesn't happen like that. if it rushes, then it rushes, and so, well, firstly, i can say, there, already as a scientific worker, there were studies by the americans and in soviet times, academician moiseev’s group, his influence on this

cold winters, which as a result of nuclear there no one will survive. it 's covered in clouds for 3 months. so that's it. it's from the sun. the earth is cooling and so on. so on a whole series of consequences. although please note. here the americans bombed yugoslavia with plutonium and the whole country of serbia lives in essence, the number of logical diseases has grown very sad. uh, bad fertility and so on. that is, you can’t say that it’s somehow great, she said it at all. i say it's on purpose because the region is essentially is under the influence of small dose-producing weapons, by the way, the factor has not been fully studied all these points, and they are studying like laboratories. here is how they studied in ukraine. all sorts of biological reagents, which were the main idea to once again lower the psychological threshold of perception of these

things. well, this is my point of view. yes, at the very beginning they mentioned that our concept is universal total defense. maybe explain to our viewers, well, as it were, what is it? well, the idea is something like this, that is, the armed forces about 60,000 people to repel aggression, the figures that the head of state calls about 500,000. we have a reserve. and we also have power structures that are also solving their problem. the idea is to increase the number of people who can act in this situation. there, up to about 140,000, the involvement of all security officials, allocating to each his own segment. if the ministry of emergency situations did not participate in this case before, they must now protect certain of their objects. well, everyone is minding their own business. i would like to say what will be to deal with and therefore a law was issued on the occasion, which gives the concept of mass riots , it is specified, for example, what an emergency is. and what about the concept of total defense, it is so called sweden

finland switzerland and i used this term to say that we are not original here, that is, in the states of our class. that is, i mean, in terms of population, such an idea is used, when not separate armed forces operate, but all together poland lithuania and latvia taking advantage of the situation that is now happening in ukraine can, uh, undercover, so to speak, attack belarus on your bis tricky question. i will give answers without cunning, if they do this, they will take appropriate measures, very good words were said at one time, when there was a war in the caucasus, he was playing the role of head of the council of ministers in russia, they began to tell him that militants were accumulating there. there are 10,000 of them there. he says let him go. we have about the same moment we do not claim any territories, but we will defend our the territory of the nuclear response,

no ecological biological others are affected at all, disasters do not frighten our neighbors said that the main driving factor driving force of all these events that are happening is money means, what is the price. why did russia act in this way not only from a military point of view, but acted harshly in relations that exist under the sanctions group. the cost of the issues is yes, 400 billion annually. it was clearly stated that russia does not want to pay such a tribute. time has passed. already on today, the loss of 500 billion is estimated according to those estimates that have always been the loss is estimated approximately to be understood. and in general, are pies a lot or a little? well, in total there were 1.600 somewhere in the billions. that is, this speech is such a decent piece, you think that almost 25% 25% in the form of tribute that

the russian federation paid in the first place, the federation, to these citizens. well, naturally. uh, when she got up from her knees , she realized that, generally speaking, she was put in a dependent position, besides, i think that if he had behaved for himself, as if respectfully enough in relation to russia, that is, they would have competed in international markets, but here every case was associated with humiliation. yes, and this doctrine, as a strategy. and here is the current information strategy. today we just don't exist. in the west. there is no statement from our leaders. there is no information only about the successful implementation of an inferiority complex. here in social networks in our citizens. it's not so with you, it's not something you have, it's bad. well, first of all, everyone has their own wedding. that is, we live how we live with us our historical path, which we have traveled, we have our own system

of organization for a long time, it worked differently than the western system in a different way and all attempts to tell that all this is accepted democratically there, but it’s not scary exaggerated, that is, they have. that's the same was saline here. he also said that in addition to the control system, there is a shadow structure that controls the circuit. uh, capital is the so-called well essentially. yes, i'm not a conspiracy theorist, but there is the forces that are managerial, that govern the movement of these people, if we look, the leadership of europe is people selected, let's say, from the youth personnel reserve created by the americans. there were thousands of people there, ranging from merkin to the leader. natom, they are all from there and they are young people who are delivered in a certain way. it turned out to be much easier. but after all, the head of the state is the people who obey you in order to ruin it, because the leadership is one of

the country's weakest points. we remember how the washington regional committee discussed the appointment in ukraine. it was the same. well, it is important who and what controls us and they say that they do not like it. our lukashenka they like such a puppet woman as tikhonovskaya who is not ready for this position. i do not want to evaluate her activities, but she is not ready for this idea. and there are many things that are happening with us. they are related to the fact that our political leadership has experience in this very tough environment and the introduction of criteria. you understand some intermediate ones. eh, right there year two or three years four if you read american works on political science. there they themselves considered that the most successful were those groups that worked during were. for at least 25 years, which actually our president yi confirms with his work experience. let's take a moment. let's take a break.

uh, after a short pause, let's return to this studio, while subscribe to our telegram channel, and look for all our releases on the youtube channel, belarus alone on the air, say, don't be silent. and today our guest is alexander ivanovsky alexander vladimirovich, based on from what we discussed here today, has our society become more resistant to informational stuffing, has our society become more resistant to informational bars, because after all there should be a pause, how should we regard this? how to perceive this and to what extent this source, in general, could be informed about this matter, but i would like to say. here are a few words that we spoke during the break. that is, when we talk about what you want to save. i would like to maintain ethical relations, that is, to believe in the good eternal bright, so that it has remained with us, because a society in

which butterflies do not live, but it seems to me, is simply not interesting, and these stuffing. they just bring us down. they are trying to bathe us in this mud, that we have been completely dehumanized, and therefore survived. if you think about why it didn’t work out in 1920, but i ’ll tell you what i’m in the process of. until we met here, i managed to read a book that was published in poland called. i go out, 350 of our slogans are collected there opponents. so, by the way, they, by the way, are interesting, they not only gave slogans, but also presented photographs of people that were in these pictures in the twentieth year. well, the slogans are completely different, but if you take a general level, that is, where do we pull up or down, then i would still lean down, because i would say a lot, vulgarity , baseness, as it were, well, and aggression. yes, there is,

of course, there is a type of humor, but i don’t even want to call it, the slogan is spinning in the language, but i don’t want to just call it, because slogans they are the main idea, which is satisfied with this concentrated expression of the claim that is. i would even like to draw your attention to the fact that, according to our ee data, after the twentieth year, if we look at what conclusions were drawn to us by the entire belarusian people's assembly, then we have a much greater degree of attention. the dwarf of the liberal component than it was before there was 33%, and during the elections, and six months later it was already 40%, e statements that concerned this area, that is, in fact, we do not sleep in a hat, but draw certain conclusions. and here we are now we see how relations between armenia and azerbaijan are heating up uh, we still remember the january events in kazakhstan

u don’t forget about uzbekistan , kyrgyzstan and so on. it is necessary to stretch the forces of russia along the entire perimeter to remove them from the operation that is taking place and therefore these points are activated along the entire perimeter. this means that both azerbaijan and armenia are one point, well , they named several other points of caucasians. there too there are certain things. you didn't name, let's say. uh, tajikistan and neighbors. there are people who work off their money creating these problems. moreover, if, for example, take the same kazakhstan, you paid attention. how many provocative discharges in the networks sound provocative itself, and the most incredible events that are taking place there means well, this, of course, is the main strategic goal to

stretch out to prevent concentration of efforts on a special military operation in ukraine if you look at official reports about spheres of the american states are planning action for the next 5 years. and i think that at least 5 years will continue. this is the situation that arose there, how it will end. let's wait, as far as we are concerned, we are also involved in this part of certain forces, which we also continue to incite to activate. so hello lead there, well, various units that are involved in hostilities. there korenovsky, let's say, by the way, pay attention to how the name of kalinovsky is already in a completely different context. what it was like in soviet times, that is, the name of the battalion itself, it says that what forces are standing, you know, i looked, a round table at the duke academy of sciences , a historian from russia defended his work

unknown klinovsky and i can tell you that among pundits there are still a lot of those who admire this figure and perceive it the same way as in soviet times, which means that not only a few, but there is a certain group of historians who literally interpret it in their own way in two words. history is a stream events that have taken place and when you choose only certain ones from this stream, you form your own concept. and in general, you are trying to claim originality and accuracy, but you do not see a different context. this is not a scientific approach. excuse me. we agreed with you that the fact is the facts, well , firstly, you can e be a historian and relies on your dreams. this is your opinion, because history, and ours is politicized and we have seen more than once in life, that it is considered with a change of power, another story, other facts, are selected and cleaned up, that's why i say that let's operate on facts, and not on

our own representations of facts, they are very much. you understand in a number of cases, if you take the historical facts themselves that are present, then , as a scientist, you must always get acquainted with the primary sources and see not only this fact, but also the consequences that would be this conversation. uh, big long, this is a methodical conversation. let's go, you know where we'll end up. you yourself have taught us yourself now and you are suffering from it. uh you said that to us you need to delve into yourself and see what is happening here, so you are often laborers of the republic of course, a bill on statehood. uh, congratulations, it's in effect. and i'm wondering what new norms you would note in this version of the law, which would increase the professional skills, perhaps civilians? employees and government officials i would like to return to our topic and i would like to note such a part that in the civil service now we seem to have all kinds of structures and

customs officers and government rumors verticals directly. the courts are the prosecutor's office, that is, roughly speaking, our civil service has become a single structure, by the way , this allows us to ensure mobility between branches, that is, well, during the transition, we think it became not more heavy, but mobile with such an expansion of the apparatus. she became mobile, he changed in a different way. in other words, now the civil service has become one, if earlier it was separate people. there, by themselves, these by themselves, in general, they remained in this part, but now this considered as a single element of the public administration system. that is, we do not distinguish between law enforcement agencies and public service structures. that is, everyone works together, but i believe. then they have become mobile and can respond to the challenges of the time quickly and well. well, firstly, i want to say respond to the challenges of the times in a difficult way, but i want

to return to this question. here i have read. now the report of our parliament of representatives for the six months that they have made is interesting, and how do people perceive events, and how they place accents when addressing these structures, military issues are in the first place. and all further. well, i mean , there is an interpretation by law of the technical issues of the military situation, the international or military fate of their upcoming military, that you start to split up from the military sphere, and then all 24-25 appeals, that is, almost twice. and if we take, for example, the same system of the ministry of internal affairs, there are only five appeals, or even six. i don’t remember exactly now, that is, like this, like this our people quite concretely see the events that are taking place and everything is according to i want to say that here in our country no one understands anything, that this is not happening. everyone thinks carefully, each in his own way. everyone thinks

the conclusions are certain, and i think that to a large extent it unites us, because we think so. excuse me, for belarus that is, how will it be, what will it be, how to believe in a song or with the motherland with us? yes, alexander vladimirovich, what we discussed today and why we discussed it is, as it were, an answer to these studies of the house of representatives are great for you. thank you for this meeting for the delicacy for your professionalism, of course, and we are waiting for you again. well , first of all, thank you very much. i think that my compliments here are quite rude, but i see more problems that we see them just like that. you see, when , for example, the same state committees start working, they work with problems. and so are we. here we are, let's say for belarus everything and when we turn to our sphere, we see certain problems here and there, but without problems happens to be another matter. how to try to solve these problems. we tatyana shcherbina victoria

popova say goodbye to you today, goodbye. goodbye. and now alexander ivanovsky is speaking, dear fellow listeners, our viewers, just our people who live in belarus, of course. for us , a very important issue that we consider is the problem of our security. it has really become a growth today, and i think that it has come to the fore due to a number of circumstances that have developed around our republic, we definitely came out if we are together, and we will definitely be together.

a project in which you can learn everything about the weather and climate. winters have become warmer than springs and colder. summer without rain and mushrooms. that is, we have some kind of mediterranean climate. only without the sea, what happens? we live in a period of global warming, and on the territory of belarus it is also celebrated to go back to the origins of the white color. he is in this sense. belousov, especially here he is, so here's the cleanliness. here is the divine beginning in him and to catch the real zen, or rather, the matrix. those who noticed that there is a feedback, setting certain rhythms to our breathing, we

can influence the state of our mind. it caught the thread. i am really with you because my thoughts were already somewhere far away. i think that soon the final of the program will run home. and now i'm here, watch the teleborometer on our tv channel. we always cook deliciously from the heart in order to prepare a delicious family dinner. we are often looking for an interesting recipe, look on the internet, check the top recipes from the internet, cook homemade pasties. i liked this recipe because it looks very beautiful in the photos shown. how to unload your evenings from the endless hassle at the stove. and now we put the dough in the refrigerator for 30 minutes, as well as in this dough. you can freeze and use within a month, we share useful tips that are sure to come in handy in the kitchen. you are sure that this is how everyone baked chicken, but

here is one of the tricks if you want to diversify your diet. you can add dried provencal herbs to the breading garlic and a little more paprika, see the program for the week on tv channel belarus 24.

st. petersburg , eventful