he rammed the car of a ryazhan, and for some reason, non-existent employees of the belarusian embassy are to blame. nevertheless , a real bacchanalia began on latvian television. here, stories continue to appear that demand to be sorted out and punished precisely by diplomats, in belarus, who have not been in the country for a long time. no, latvia also did not consider it necessary to pronounce the situation, from his comments it turned out that the numbers were still our embassy, ​​but someone illegally used them. the belarusian side considers it necessary to resolutely refute the insinuations and emphasizes his complete non-involvement in the scandalous incident. in recent years, the cybersecurity of belarus has grown 10 times . one of the developers of the concept on information security alexander ivanovsky, one of the developers of the concept on information security, alexander ivanovsky, said that this segment, against the general background, puts pressure on all spheres, social and political, including the stripped level organized

cybercrime against this background from belarus , the clearance of cases in this area increased by 25%. harder problems with what's acting on us and abroad. well, in our society , we feel almost every day there are advertisements that you do not respond to these proposals, questions that if you start small things. and, of course, questions related to a higher level and therefore here. of course, you need to keep your ears on top. now our concept of national security is being envisaged, including the sphere of information of these things. also, the host of the program discussed with the guest in the studio partial mobilization in russia and what lessons belarus can learn from it as today to surpass the opponent in the information space, and what does our concept of general, total defense mean ? improving the quality of service to taxpayers by developing

interactive services based on feedback and research on user experience in the commonwealth countries the 29th meeting of the coordinating council was held in minsk by heads of tax services. the cis summed up the results of work for the past year and set priorities for the next main task is to improve the quality of services and create favorable conditions for taxpayers. this is a very good platform. where we can share experience. this is a very good platform, where we can be for our payers, but for our citizens, because the most important thing is to provide comfort. it is not just comfort for paying taxes. actually from the tax authorities. in many ways, the comfort of doing business depends very significantly, and therefore, of course, on how we will qualitatively exchange practices, and tax administration of tax services will depend on how well and convenient it is to do business in our countries in terms of

tax complexity. eh, in their work they strive to put, probably, rather, so to speak, a service model for servicing taxpayers. it must be understood that the taxpayer is the best set. this is the one that pays taxes on its own, that is, the desire to pay them is physical. and accordingly, we will build our work in such a way as to create such conditions for him it was convenient and easy-formation system for the control of indirect taxation, value -added tax and shares of the country's legislation should be brought into line for the first of january. for our part, as a tax administration, which, maybe on the side of belarus, on the side of the russian federation, we are already completing the creation of an information system for controlling indirect taxation, so we have a creative part of the norm and, let's say, the technical part is also almost

completely ready. the meeting was attended heads of tax administrations and experts of azerbaijan armenia kazakhstan kyrgyzstan russia tajikistan also representatives of the executive committee of the cis and the eec two people died in the lida region in a head-on collision audio peugeot these shots taken a few minutes after the accident the accident happened this morning on the m11 highway near the village of belitsa as a result of a strong blow, both drivers, aged 38 and 50, died on the spot, an investigative-operational group is working. accessible environment or comfort for each extension barrier-free space in the minsk region was discussed at a field seminar, the meeting brought together the heads of specialized structures, from all areas, tactile tiles and ramps, lifting mechanisms and road markings , inclusive elements. we considered not only the housing stock as an example, we studied

transport social infrastructure facilities, including a kindergarten and a secondary school in the village of kopischa. an electric wheelchair was presented there; such a hunting step can be used by any institution. we are establishing this contact in order to the most rational decision to make and help. well, as quickly as possible and as efficiently as possible for people with disabilities, we understand that every person with a disability wants to, but today to go out into the street today to be as free as possible the processor of organizing an accessible environment is a painstaking and long work. i think that every inhabitant of our country notices that there are also unsuitable parking spaces and somewhere curbs are already being lowered. where they used to be tall. and what appears everywhere ramps kindergartens schools shops, uh, all public facilities have equipment and we do for normal access for people with disabilities. i

say these are new. well, it’s somehow easier, we are already laying it right away. and when planning already e even housing. why do i mention housing, that this is the most demanded product of housing, we already know every time that if there is a category of people with disabilities, the first floors, this is for them, but whether this housing stock exists is a separate conversation, which in we approach each one individually. one of the latest examples is an adapted house in krupka apartments, where they are maximally adapted for the life of people with physical disabilities . now about 90,000 people with disabilities live in the minsk region in a comfortable environment. more than 650 facilities are planned to be built for them in the next 3 years in the region. in the year of the 140th anniversary of the birth of yanka kupala, the state literary museum celebrates another anniversary belarus collection. named one of the most

famous and favorite poems of kupala anniversary of the book and the museum has prepared a thematic exhibition. on it are original documents , manuscripts, personal items. kupala they give a complete picture of that time of particular interest in the life story portrait. kupala is the only one of its kind with our appropriate ones put up to dictate to us by the national archives of the republic of belarus, this is already the third spider. uh, a partnership project and our broad chromate to say the first thing on our news will be able to confide in the history of knowledge itself spanish. here i and the original documents of the 1920s from the finds are affixed. in denmark the collection itself. and so itself and if only you had copies of it. what uh will be able to know everything already kupala in that part. the museum continues a series of events dedicated to the anniversary of the belarusian

songwriter, so on october 20, dome explorers will gather here for the traditional scientific and practical conference kupala readings. the broadcast will continue sports news, follow the projects of the tv news agency in social networks about our mobile application. you can download software by qr-code on the screen before the meeting from 13:00. the national futsal team of belarus was defeated by the portuguese in the opening match of the main round of the world cup qualification, the outcome of the meeting was in favor of the opponent 5-3. group four, except for our team and the portuguese. also, the lithuanian final will be held by the winner of the group, the team that takes second place will play in the joints. never in the history of the belarusian national team has played in the world championships after 12 seasons in the championship countries in hockey, the sensational leader was

the winner of this year's cup of salt, vitebsk the day before yesterday in the north derby the bear on foreign ice was beaten by new stripes khimik with a score of 4: 3, and the pursuers could not score three points the day before they beat in the derby of the grodno region. lida is 21. and today, the new leader on the road again plays the basis of a strip chemist, the current champion of the country metallurg in zhlobin will take the salts of the city miner, and the last top 3 lokomotiv vorsha will often start to meet with minsk youth, 19. hours

hello, the general director of the minsk news agency is visiting us today, the chairman of the board of the belarusian union of journalists and just a very experienced talented well-known journalist andrei krivosheev, hello andrey evgenievich hello well, of course, i want

to ask a question right off the bat about the recent situation that outraged many of my colleagues, this is a blocking in telegram ah. ksyusha lebedeva azarenka is even glad that yes, and the bone was blocked. in general, we are forbidden to tell the truth, it turns out, and we are already there in tiktok survived blocking in facebook and telegram seemed to be the last platform that we still have and here it is again. and how can we from the side of the belarusian union of journalists. maybe even make a fuss. yes , do not reach out to some international organizations to show that our right to the truth is being violated. what can we do? we can make a fuss and we are trying to do it. in all of our platforms for journalistic uh, in our uh, negotiations there with unesco with uh special, and the osce representative on freedom of speech, you will be surprised, but there is such a person. e, yes. uh, but how effective will it be? of course , we have no illusions here. the fact is

that after uh 2020, especially uh, digital censorship digital totalitarianism uh in the so -called social media a just came out on a new uh, previously unseen and unheard of. eh, edge. uh-huh and height. well, i wouldn't even say it's height. this is most likely the bottom, as young people like to say the bottom. broken. uh, the fact is that why the so-called social networks, because at the stage of formation of a set of popularity accounts, social networks are all these big digital media corporations promised us. the word freedom of communication is a barrier-free environment from the point of view of even those ethical standards that existed in convergent e, but classical journalism, that is, we were told that if you cannot express heightened emotionality in a newspaper or on

radio or television, then here is a platform for you and social media platform, where you can in the language of the blissful sphere in the language of the emotional in the language of e and epithets. sometimes even obscene express their thoughts and position, thus we were lured into the space of these same social messengers, communicators, hosting services . and after that, indeed, uh, a large period of digital totalitarianism began, by the way, it did not start with us. remember how simple the digital execution was for the current us president donald trump. they sawed it out of all social networks. after that, any normal sober-minded journalist had no illusions left at the click. uh, fingers, an unnamed anonymous censor. we can cut from any e social network from any company and none of our rights to anyone. e,

believe me, they will not defend themselves, except for ourselves, therefore, on the one hand. yes , the belarusian union of journalists is knocking on all doors, declares its discrimination, declares a de facto ban on the profession. because social networks. now - this is part of our profession, but on the other hand. we understand that for the sake of the political situation, we can be cut out of any social network and all officials of the european union, the united nations, e.g., local or regional or international e, unions, forums and federations of journalists. taken together, they can't do anything about it. at best, they will be condemned. uh, brows furrow, in the worst case, concern will remain silent. yes, of course, but here repeatedly. after all, our president spoke, that is, digital good neighborliness. and this, in general, happened in

china, we see in fact, and i generally think that she was coolly deceived, because at the beginning of the 2000s it was icq mail.ru our relatives, and then we so abruptly moved the universe by a meter . and now we dependent on it and like an outcast forced. here we are kicked out or not kicked out. how to create your own platform, maybe it should be some kind of allied platform. and in general, is it really possible for us to make some kind of cis space our own social networks that will, well, definitely compete, that is, definitely not worse than a instagram facebook and telegram well, this is not a question for journalists. this is a question for software developers. this is a question for it-shnikam. after all, in essence. kaya, a convenient platform in the form of the viber messenger was made, but by belarusian developers, but uh, the fact is that, uh, according to the classical formula of marx, for 500% there or for 300% of the profit, the capitalist will strangle himself and buy a rope, uh, in

order to strangle himself, so uh, yes, as soon as viber reached e capitalization, he wanted to enter the global market. e messenger software compete. and he immediately sold out, which is why the viber policy. now i will not say that she is loyal and comfortable, if you take it in general in a circle, but to journalists who express their positions that are different from the mainstream, at least uh, in those states where viber is down to earth, well, fashionably down to earth, actually enforces national laws. but can we create and such attempts are being made? look, there is rutube and smotrim.ru and many other uh hosting uh vk videos, uh, who are trying to create uh new platforms for communications. e in the russian-speaking segment. and the internet succeeds or not, yet. in my opinion it doesn't work well. but the fact is that we ourselves

, er, created these billions of accounts, millions there, hundreds of millions of accounts in social networks that are not there, but the company that is currently blocking us is being censored. moreover, practically nothing, without hiding, calls for the murder on a national basis of all russians, for example, for all russians. eh, it used to be considered e in the western world. uh, fascism nazism xenophobia. and now, uh, this new policy is being justified. uh, culture, canceling the new attack policy. journalism, as it were, the new normal , as everyone says, yes, in the west it is so hypocritical in many ways it looks a pity. well say, well, understand here's a new normality. we can't do anything about it . pardon for making us feel like outcasts of us. we hear constant words of sanctions, we hear some kind of

insults. we see how we are constantly blocked or we are given a warning that they gave me a warning that we will block you for the truth, in fact. well, here you are communicating very much, perhaps in general, through the joint efforts of unions and journalists. yes , by the way, i would like to argue about china , uh, on the one hand. of course, we are not chinese and just take china's experience in building its internal space in social communications. we will not be able to, although because we are not one and a half billion. china is self-sufficient chinese culture, so deep, versatile and diverse, in fact covers a civilizational self-sufficient layer in this sense. and so china could introduce, uh, let's say, an external perimeter for their social networks. you try to download something from chinese hosting or get there from an external circuit if you don’t have a special password, if your information gadget is not fixed by location inside china in

so many hostings, you will not physically enter chinese social networks uh-huh and this is a protective shell that china has built for its social communications, and the chinese people think that this is right? yeah, because that's the way it is, and the chinese protect their very identity, and do not protect their self-sufficiency, their culture, their traditional family values, religious beliefs. ah, ideals. uh, including the communist socialist and they of this are not shy. can we do this? i don't think so. i don't know. to grieve, i think, it is unlikely that we are not so great self-sufficient. unfortunately, even from the point of view of e human capital, there are only 10 million of us. but add here, the russian- speaking space, and the cis that communicates in russian, but it will be 180,200 million

people, but given how aggressively, e, foreign social networks, or rather other people's digital corporations in the same ukraine in the same armenia e, in the same, kazakhstan a. can we build the same perimeter? i think not, and whether our people will want to live in a closed circuit, uh, and communicate in a closed circuit without an exit. let's say the european union, the united states of america, latin america. i don't think we want to do that either. but do we need to create our own social networks, hosting, communicators, and our own information environment, or, as the minister of information of belarus says, our own media landscape unconditionally. yes, and in fact this very thing. we are working now. is it worth the huge technological and, uh, resource efforts in terms of, again

same development for sure. do we have resources for this, if they don’t i will say so, then we will not be able to effectively resist in the information war of the information war. this is the most interesting topic for me. i remember that 2 years ago i was crazy about this, it was a terrible persecution. we in belarus , in general, of course, encountered. here, the concentration was high, because we have few of us, yes, that is, everything is close to us, we are so more compact and i know that the belarusian union of journalists is worth it be proud to react very quickly to this. that is, firstly, the support was moral. i remember it perfectly, secondly, and you seem to have even filed complaints with the obse, that is, have i painted it wrong? well, that is, i remember that attention was drawn. you tried to draw the attention of international organizations to this problem that you are not normal when all the personal data of journalists are merged 2 years have passed. we

can already bring some kind of current, is there a result at all, but the result is uh, our inner what we wanted uh, to achieve and achieved. we supported ours. eh, colleagues of journalists, by the way, suffered the most, just our regional colleagues, where the editorial board consists of 5-6 people. imagine if this organized campaign to harass a small editorial office of the inter-district district level of the city media of a small belarusian town is subjected to a targeted attack from the sides right up to coming home or coming to kindergarten to your child, and there have been such cases or when the insane gather a group of these informational terrorists there who are there a group of 30-40 people come to the editorial office and begin to storm one thing here in minsk where it really is. we have a serious support, where we support each other and supported in 2020 is

another matter in the regions. and yes, we never hid it. to protect journalists, we attracted our partners to the point that our partners were our public organizations, the patriotic union, the afghans union of officers, and those who could really physically protect journalists in that difficult period, and i am grateful to everyone who responded to us on our appealed and defended our colleagues regarding the discussion with ms reibera and the osce special representative on freedom of expression. yes , we had a three-hour discussion. with her, yes, we presented all the facts and evidence that more than, at that time, 400 colleagues of the members of the union of journalists were subjected to this or that measure of harassment, violence, threats, including life and health, an attempt on our colleagues was being prepared. uh, absolutely illegal there, as they were called illustration lists. we have outlined our position, we have brought evidence for this discussion we invited

journalists who suffered health damage as a result of the company's bullying, including, uh, mental health were nervous breakdowns. we were carefully listened to and the results of this discussion came out. now i'm afraid to make a mistake with a seven or eight-line statement that belarus should follow certain standards declared by the osce, and this is absolute hypocrisy, an absolute weakness, unfortunately, of the once authoritative institutions that declare their main goal to protect journalists. freedom of speech independence editorial policies, and so on and so forth, all these beautiful words, unfortunately, for the sake of political expediency, were pushed aside. actually. this is how we evaluate our current interaction with these respected structures. in particular. we , after a series of such fake publications of attacks on the belarusian union of journalists, we

suspended our membership in the international federation of journalists. because no practical help from our colleagues. we have not received we stated that, unfortunately, a reputable organization. mfj, got under the influence of a group of radicals fell under the influence of fake information, the state of affairs in belarusian journalism and, on the basis of fakes, adopted some resolutions, an appeal to the belarusian civil society, as soon as you are in dear colleagues in the international federation of journalists of the european federation of journalists. admit the fact of aggression, recognize the illegality of the imposed sanctions against belarusian journalists on our colleagues, by the way, this illegality was recognized by the general court of the european union in luxembourg. we have two decisions that confirm the illegality of sanctioning restrictions against belarusian journalists, but you understand, uh, in

this u new normality that they have or abnormalities that our especially european union colleagues have built for themselves like behind a stone wall. they can simply close their eyes and not react to the preparation of an assassination attempt. uh, for the murder of our colleague or for the preparation of the attempted murder of, uh, the leaders of the largest belarusian media holdings. take a terrorist attack against dasha, you we saw the reaction of the international federation of journalists or the european federation of journalists to this bloody murder to this terrorist attack, that is, they managed with some stupid formulations that father daria means a philosopher close to putin. and that and that on this basis it is possible to kill his child through a terrorist act. that is , what do you think you are calling for, if you admit such a possibility? this means that

any journalist, uh, who is a member of the european federation of journalists or the international federation of journalists is also on the same grounds, may be executed, or how in this sense belarus has something to be proud of in our country for the last quarter of a century, at least, and as a result of the performance of their journalistic duties, not a single journalist has died. this is an indicator from this point of view, we are one of the safest states in the world for journalism, any other state. we are surrounded. i can’t boast of such a thing, i want to talk about the future already. eh, not only everything turns around. we are something, and experience is certainly important, it cannot be ignored. must be taken into account, but now the union media holding is going to another level. i read about it all and i'll be honest. i don’t understand why we need it, we definitely need it, we definitely need the main idea that we discussed with the

russian union of journalists long before the signing of the union decree and long before the presidents of the republic of belarus of the russian federation announced the need to create it and pushed this process. we are having these conversations. here in our journalistic shop already, probably, the last five years, at least. here we are discussing. what should be this union media holding, in what environments should it be active, will it be social messengers or not? or he should stop at classical journalism. and how to combine efforts? how to make content delivery efficient when not only we in belarus consume content produced in the russian federation, but also content produced in the republic of belarus reaches a huge russian audience simply by signing mutual agreements, that is, why do we need a separate holding? no, here here it is necessary to divide it this way, that is, we have, uh,

the budget of the union state and the main message of the presidents, that the budget is serious experienced people, but in our opinion professional corporations and in the opinion of managers and in the opinion of states, that is, members of the state of belarus of russia, this resource spent not quite efficiently. so that's the task and the president - he outlined this very clearly. let's gather all our strength, all the resources, all the possibilities, including the possibilities of journalists' unions , in order to make this work effective. noah transparent and illustrative, but who would oppose this , therefore, of course, a media holding is needed and, uh, i don’t know a single professional journalist who would oppose the effectiveness of journalists, look. here is another point that i have always paid attention to - this is my personal position. believe me, i did not coordinate it with anyone, but returning to the first question.