hello hello everyone. who is watching us now and, of course, the participants in this issue. hello, the autumn bad weather is fading, and fu, it’s not hot that the international situation has survived with the nuclear topic completely, it seems that the taboo has been removed and now it ’s almost familiar on the agenda, in general, horror strikes on critical

infrastructure and a merciless, information war. these are the conditions on the eve of the meeting in the ministry of defense, the president of belarus talked about the main threats. here is one of the snippets instead of supporting my own population difficult socio-economic environment to show more plans to increase its military regime. trying to keep up in the militaristic race, lithuania and latvia, but they don’t have their own funds, are asking nato to strengthen its presence on their territories by deploying battalion brigade combat tactical groups on the ground. they began building new military camps to accommodate them on a permanent basis, including in close proximity to our border is 20 km. lithuania announced its intention to acquire american hymars multiple launch rocket systems, why do they need military people,

i think, there is no need to explain. let's talk about threats about the situation. we’ll just start talking, but i’ll explain not for military people. here is alexander ivanovich and why is there hayma in lithuania? how does it react? it was said, clearly, that the threat is of a military-political nature, the himers are offensive weapons, so lithuania still needs them for some kind of aggressive actions, and they are preparing for these actions. and not only lithuania, but the whole baltic region, and especially poland. on they also show ukraine that the threat from there is also of a military-political nature. first of all, there are military threats. why hymers? well, they probably want to raise their significance, uh, on the european continent, and to get uh, offensive weapons, they think

that they are strengthening their security, in my opinion. on the contrary, they are, they are already specific targets, as soon as they have this weaponry. well, on the other hand, politics. it is a concentrated expression of the economy. the economy in lithuania, uh, is declining in the large population is dissatisfied, so we need to distract from the hammers - this is an opportunity to distract the population from all the hardships that have already begun and that are yet to come, because today is not the time when you can talk about that this is only such a psychological game in order to show your own population, what you said and hint to others that it really can be some kind of when a trigger on the territory of ukraine arises, that they are the successes of the russian federations of a critical nature. they can immediately use it all correctly, plus in lithuania, and there are two training grounds that are actively used by nato troops for precisely practicing practical actions.

this is the hand and beard of the beaver. in general, it is located in the immediate vicinity of the border and on our territory you can hear something perfectly, you can even hear how what is being done there at these training grounds? here is the ostrovetsky district. it's great to hear everything, so. uh, they think that's how they keep themselves safe, though fulfill, of course, someone else's order, if how do you see this situation and what challenges are in front of us in the first place. the real challenge lies in the fact that our western neighbors are getting ready. well, in fact, to attack, based on the nature of the weapons of their actions that they perform. this is the first. the second ukrainian direction. it is extremely unsafe, since serious plus troops are concentrated there. we see that here are the militants from among the fugitives. yes, they are also concentrated on the territory of poland on the territory of ukraine, and of course, it is important for us not

allow no provocations on their part, because, apparently, their owners. we decided to prepare them already, as watchdogs specifically for the attack, and hence these formations of combat detachments from here, their support from the special services, in fact, the states of poland , ukraine and further britain, the united states, that is, we need to watch very carefully, and then our borders, to happen in their immediate vicinity. and of course, that's what they are waiting for, er, some setbacks of defeat on the ukrainian front. and as soon as they feel what appears they have, but the opportunity to do something in our direction. they will do it and you need to be ready for it. you know, history teaches nothing. and most importantly, we went through all this, and the fortieth year is the forty-first year. you also remember the concentration of troops near

the borders. well, we believe all the time, we believed that, well, it’s so simple, in fact, everything repeats itself today, and indeed those countries, especially the baltic countries, the states of hmm , well, which, let’s be honest, already uh, somewhere back in the backyards of the economic backyards and of course one must declare to oneself and even the acquisition of weapons, most likely, this is unwillingness. even, probably, these countries were simply offered to them. they were strongly offered to buy these weapons in order to justify deliveries to europe, and even more so at the border. uh, our republic is, of course, a big question. and uh, the president very rightly said that we should all be ready to understand that these are not toys. and the fact that yesterday, uh, the head of state discussed both openly and said that all these issues need to be discussed with the population. it really. so we have always lived in a

safe beautiful country. we have always hoped and we hope for peace to our states, but the time is changing and we must be ready. here's to challenges and aggression, and i'm sure that, uh, after all. everything will be fine, but at the same time, you need to be prepared for what happens. these are thousands of thousands of tens of thousands of armed people near our borders. how much from vilnius to minsk nothing at all. well, south direction. look at the drones are working in a sabotage-explosive groups of feygens of little ones, which recently time regularly, they say that, well, in general, it is already necessary to use hymers somewhere in the belarusian territory. that is, it is still the main threat. with us now we can choose this western or southern direction or for today. we must consider them in a single bundle, of course in a single one, that is, we cannot speak. in general, we do not see at all, but such a threat and a pure human one. yes, we never threatened anyone. at least the

peoples the government is one thing, but we are our peoples, they have always been united and we have always these issues were not resolved, but what is happening now is what is happening in ukraine when they are called to conduct military operations against the country, which supported all the time and helped, when there was a need for e ukraine and this, of course, is incomprehensible. but we must be ready to do so. geographical congestion that belarus is just around all the strong of such countries is now a lot of speculation on the topic of belarus a special military operation on the eve of the president. e, apparently, has accumulated all these institutions that are on this account and what questions such an answer was direct, what is called on the forehead? i offer now a snippet. listen, then we will discuss, as for our participation in a special military operation in ukraine, we participate there, we do not hide it, but we do not kill anyone. we are not

saving anywhere, we are not sending our military, we are not violating our obligations. our participation is to prevent the spread of this conflict on the territory of belarus, firstly, and secondly, to prevent a strike on belarus under the guise of a special military operations from poland, lithuania and latvia, as i said, no one will shoot the back of the russians from the territory of belarus. here is our participation. yes, we treat treated people if necessary. yes, we feed people and not only russians. most of all, we feed those refugees of the lower poor people who come to us from ukraine for 400-500 people a day, but how not to feed them, how not to treat them, there is no other such participation in this military operation and

never will be. you know, when we consider this conflict from one side? yes, this is a military component of another political one we have said more than once during our program what the main goals are, because now they are trying to realize them. uh, american british corporations. they understand that they have had a very strong financial and economic crisis since the sixteenth year, and they were well aware that there is nothing better than war, like uh, a good economic trigger and uh, hmm the one who can increase economic growth now even a number of publications in the british press in the american press came out, which say that in in principle, here is a war in e. in ukraine, it contributed to an increase in economic growth due to the fact that almost more than 50% of the us gdp is formed at the expense of,

and in defense corporations and corporations that are around, that is, when certain countries say that let's buy himorses. or let's buy some new perfect equipment, from someone in a, british and american corporations. thus, they naturally contribute to the exit of american e, companies of the american economy from the crisis, but e for at the expense of its citizens at the expense of its taxpayers, and it is clear that, uh, when we discuss the conflict. they are well aware. most importantly aspect and a threat to them. this is that we have the possibility of using our use of nuclear weapons against them, that is, any movement across the border. well , who will fight with them, but all all the military understand that it is quite difficult to contain such a group. yes, tank battles. there, in the forty- first year, no one will arrange to

use perfect weapons. what weapon will apply? yes, either uh already openly use tactical nuclear weapons and burn them out right away, or i already use my offensive weapons, which, uh, are behind multiple launch rocket systems, and burn them out completely. and i do not understand that the victims will be colossal. uh, their losses will be colossal. and most importantly, european, their audience will not digest such a large number of victims of their soldiers, their officers, and they understand perfectly well, therefore they are escalating the situation, forcing, uh, poland to the baltic countries. there ukraine to acquire this. e arms solve their economic problems. but in this situation we certainly cannot, but calm down. it is our main task to demonstrate that we have such types of weapons and such tactics and such a strategy that will lead to huge casualties if

they occur. that is, their company will be. well , somehow uh initially flawed even then, and another important aspect that we, among other things, have to say, we must form new pictures of the world. yes, given that if you step, uh will step on ours, what will you have yes and broadcast this picture to their audience in the english-language media in there and in the polish media baltic media and no one canceled. uh, counter-propaganda flyers. well conditionally information leaflets. it affects their audience. you have to rock them very hard. eh, the establishment, rock them, uh, the public, so that there inside, uh, a cauldron starts, they understand. uh, how can you wage information wars, psychological warfare. we must act in exactly the same way against them we see that in different ways the demonstration occurs this word we do. how is china behaving during the

exercise. they show the arsenal that they have north korea that launches missiles. also with a demonstration that the guys, if you cross the red line, we have something to answer an interesting event, when putin announced the entry of four regions into the russian federation, vladimir zelensky immediately makes a statement that he is rapidly entering they are nato. we see that by this he surprised his patrons from among nato a lot, which it would seem like, probably, it seemed to zelensky that they should immediately pat him on the shoulder, and here they are, in this case, a demonstrative performance by us secretary of defense loido. austin is said almost immediately, the us authorities are committed to nato's open door policy. however, they emphasize that the decision to admit new members to the alliance should be made by all countries of the bloc, if no one transfers you from the diplomatic one, ukraine is not waiting for you in nato. here's how to understand it? it turns out they threw a set-up for ukraine well, i think that this is not the first set-up that the west of ukraine is doing, if we take their relationship and attempts

to join the european union, then this is also something like this, maybe it was not done so openly, but here are a few. in my opinion , the goals were pursued in the first place. this is to intercept the information agenda from russia, because, uh, if we take the facts significant facts, then russia has grown into four subjects. this is an accomplished fact. uh, legally you can argue, how did anyone admit it? who did not recognize, but it is a fact. uh, that's why it's such a not-so-uh-persuasive, but nonetheless attempt to intercept, information management initiative on the part of zelensky what kind of reaction, probably, it was predictable and it is clear that only the european exterminator and the americans are not interested, especially the population of these countries. it is not ready to fight for seversk zakupyansk, or for something else in ukraine, so this is all understandable and reaction.

predictable because. uh, there is no possibility and no desire to take the initiative, uh, and unleash a world war. because if friends found nine friends, really, that's all, taking into account, uh, which ones can consequences for ukraine when joining nato and nato, ukraine’s crime against such friends of enemies does not need to be solved, estonia latvia lithuania well, who can miss the audience poland romania czech republic slovakia northern macedonia ardently supported eh, zelensky’s statement yesterday, the head of state clearly said that every day 10 planes land in poland so consider yes with guns. well, for ukraine, of course, they are considering e their territory. as possible logistics. and here it was said about how revitalization of the economy, that they will be in demand and, uh, the european union does not help the eastern countries of the former

eastern bloc, if i may say so, so their hope is connected with the fact that they will be in demand, that is, surrendered sovereignties turn into training grounds into bases instead states will receive aggression. well , of course, and what else do they trade with their own security, that is, they represent themselves as economically giants. they cannot they are suppressed in this sense of germany by western corporations industry. as such, no, it remains to trade its territory, as a springboard for an attack on expansion further to the east. this is what is left when the elites of these countries choose the western path. well, this is the colonial path, that is, instead of, well , some more or less sovereign rulers, it turns out such native princes who are partners. they say we are not a colony auto power. such a belief, well, you can call yourself whatever you like, but there are facts. yes, belarus, uh, is really a sovereign

country, because in relations with everyone, even with such giants as china and russia, we can always defend our national interest and achieve a compromise on favorable terms, or we really offer some kind of equal cooperation, despite different weights, because we have something to offer and we really do not trade our security. if we did this, well, we said, well, well, the russians have been deploying nuclear weapons bases 10 years ago. and so, give us money so that we threaten the neighbors. but we don't do that. we responsibly approach regional security, because we know that as soon as weapons are increased somewhere, there will be an immediate answer, and this escalation at the end will lead us to a dead end in this sense, of course, we need to appreciate. first, our sovereignty. he went to us, maybe without great losses there. yes, as without warriors, many countries are fighting for the fact that we have it well. this still shows the wisdom of our people and

leadership that we did not fight with our neighbors, we do not have territorial claims against them, we do not want to escalate the situation once again, but if they do it in relation, we should be there be sure today this idea sounded that as soon as the foot of a nato soldier crosses our border. all available means, both in the republic of belarus and in the russian federation, will be applied to these states. and i am sure that, for example, our leader will not have the slightest doubt to use this weapon to beat. it will not be on the outskirts, but on the center of decision-making. what he loudly and distinctly spoke about sound thoughts, including in the west, new swei magazine, which, in general, does not differ in great love for russia and towards the slavic world, but nevertheless, they are trying to maintain at least visually the line. such serious journalism. he called zelensky's proposal, uh, the worst ideas in history. let

's understand that, in general, they don't share it either. alexei but in the meantime, if you look. but the de-factor tanata is already fighting on the territory of ukraine, isn't it? but they say, here are these radio intercepts, mm, that occur there from the side, well, i’ll conditionally call ukraine not ukrainian and not russian, you can’t hear, there is romanian speech, english speech, french, whatever, but not in those it would seem that the peoples who live in this territory. well, you know, uh, when they talk about nato, the main members of nato identify themselves as an elite club, and all those eastern countries and eastern europe that became members of nato in the nineties two thousand years. this is their interpretation. this is a meter state or a meter state is the old roman e, the terminology is a border state, and the border area, uh, which border on an alien civilization and their main

task is to maintain the border troops of the roman empire. here they are exactly the same. it also applies to the fucking eastern europe, that is, there should not be any economy in these territories, they must supply, provide support, but these border troops are border troops. it is clear the grouping that they are now reinforcing to the ato. uh, the participation of instructors on the territory of ukraine . if some western and eastern experts say so. but, but you need to understand what goal they achieve. yes, what is the ultimate goal of nato, that is, okay, there is a conflict, a conflict in ukraine, uh, strengthening the group in our, uh, territories. and then, that they want to capture moscow to the urals to reach, what's next, but this question immediately arises. if they realize that e

will be the use of nuclear weapons, the use of e weapons of mass destruction there. e of this group, that is, no one will hand over the entire territory to them, which means, uh, gets tired only uh, one answer to all these questions. they do it exclusively for their own. well , as it was said earlier, mercantile goals, but these mercantile goals, you understand , must always be fueled, that is, the permanent conflict that exists on the territory of ukraine is their business model. and this is a business model that can participate in it. eh, the inspectors will also refer there, here, whom we see and kiss the weapons, the more e will fight. uh, there is russia and ukraine with a dash of nato on the territory. eh, this country, so much the better for them, but it gets up from there. the most important question. hey, when will this all end? that is, it will end when russia annexes all

the territories. e regions of ukraine to russia or will go even further to join. territories, and then poland territories, and then romania and thus the whole group will move somewhere closer to the atlantic ocean and uh, here, uh, definitely those, uh, the decision-making center is working out in the same way. uh, counter-attacks from russia. they understand that everything can end for them for a very long time. here if pay attention to one side. we see that they immediately made a statement that they did not recognize it. uh, russian sovereignty over these four, uh, new territories. e areas, while the russian federation immediately designated and the member is not going to deviate from this completely, that all the completeness of management extends , including defense, to these new areas. and here everyone who is observed from the side. unless,

of course, today you can stay away from what is happening there. they say that this is completely new fa. a confrontation that does not leave this buffer for making a decision, that is, each next decision may turn out to be critical in this situation. well, what will it be a game of nerves, a game of demonstrating the latest weapons? here is a sanlachkov military man, as you can see, i don’t envy you now the military people who make serious decisions precisely for the reason that such a colossal moral composure is needed here. yes, that is, a strong spirit must be that the stakes are raised so high that one wrong movement from one side or the other. it can lead to irreversible consequences and there were many such moments in history and it makes no sense to list them, but in my opinion. eh, what could it lead to? uh, russia has clearly stated that this is its territory, and it will

protect them. this is one moment, the second moment is her. i so uh, i predict that she is thinking about the people who live there, because this is the pension provision, which ukraine does not fulfill uh in its territories, this is the socio-economic development of these regions, despite the fact that there are actual military actions. it's, uh, a job opportunity, an education opportunity, a health care opportunity. e, and. uh, summarizing this, we can say that it kind of shows the way russia is striving for, uh, in the ukrainian territories, where they live. e those territories that used to be ukraine, there are more russians living there than ukrainians. if so, to put it simply. yes, so what further action the rates are raised for us. here, for example, for us, what this situation requires of us, but it was clear

it was said that we are required to strengthen our defense capabilities and it was clearly stated that we are participating in a special military operation, but we are participating on our territory, we are participating in the fact that we have a grouping of troops jointly with the russian federation we have our own national armed forces. we have systems for ensuring national security so that, firstly, we maintain our sovereignty and independence, and secondly, we fulfill our allied obligations in relation to the agreements that we have there is both with the russian federation and within the framework of the csto and within the framework. uh, other uh, friendly blocs, probably, which implies not only that the military must be ready, but every alexey yes is here. e, for example, we can say that our power bloc is really mobilized and ready and the highest level of understanding of the situation. the military-political leadership has a different matter and my colleagues talk about this.

hmm, they say and write that they are at meetings at dialogue platforms. people ask, here is an example we would like to get some knowledge, well elementary in medicine means where to run in case of emergency? yes, how to use weapons? moreover, the president has said more than once that the task is for our people's militia, so to speak, to really have these skills. now you need to systematically accurately deploy correctly. in my opinion , the system of work with the population is already in a practical sense, that is, we more or less understand in words what is happening, but it is necessary that not only our military, but everyone else be taken by surprise. our population, especially border regions in which case, that is we really need to unfold this work without panic, without haste, but so that it still takes place and people who want to improve their knowledge. and there are still people who would like to help financially. yes, this is a volunteer, let's say a volunteer.