yes, she doesn’t say anything to the league from the bbc, but i only know him visually, because there have been a huge number of such colleagues in recent years, the problem is not so much that they falsify, er, reality for the sake of some bonuses. uh, some payments of additional forces. well, for business trips to a hot spot. the problem is that they are trying this altered reality. as you quite rightly said, but to bombard people in their heads with this informational untruth in almost all countries of the world, distorting, in fact, in this way the consciousness of people's perception of what is happening and forms the future, which is beneficial exclusively to them, of course. well, there is a deeper problem here. and we are witnessing the decay of truth, yes, that is, everyone lies to the examination, died, and so on. yes, all these well-known postulates already and people do not trust the sources of information. well, i think by any uh, the same jeremy that you don't know, i didn't know him before either. yes, but then i read it. he was in

lebanon, but he also practiced exactly the same manner, he had and he was convicted and called answer, but pay attention nonetheless. yes, it continues to work. that is, such a combat unit, it is needed, that is. well, he skillfully makes these reports and digs on the temnik. that is, we are here, as it were, approaching the main question. or it may happen that in the foreseeable future the pendulum will swing in the opposite direction, people will say, well , give me the truth all the same. i think it will definitely happen. and uh, it will happen, maybe not even as far in the future as we can now imagine , because that amount alternative information that has nothing to do with the reality of information that is now falling on the heads of our e, european neighbors, mainly western neighbors, but not comparable in volume with what was

again 5-10 years ago, quantity always turns into quality . in this case, even a negative quantity will definitely turn into quality when people start asking questions. how much you can feed us with this, how much you can shove into us, just push a certain agenda into us, which is beneficial to a very specific very narrow circle. uh, stakeholders. i am absolutely sure that the pendulum will swing, i am absolutely sure that people ask a question and you should be ready to answer this question. you're right. we will now show this on the example of the festival, yes eurasia, before which everything that we are discussing now was held in minsk is very consonant with the program of the eurasia doc festival. ah, grand prix. this is a festival awarded to the director from germany, wilhelm keshulz house, for the film odessa, we will not forget, we will not forgive, which actually tells about the sad known fact. uh, when people were burned in the house of the fallen water unions in odessa let's see. the moment of this film there is just a

real black woman lying, squinting, as if they were mad. l. i, too, most likely, this is what they bring to. don't film me. i don't take it off, i take one more of them. and one more bug. there are still open doors. good.

turn over, thank god, ukraine came from the european union and interviewed us. we told all this with our own, how to say brother-soldiers so to speak. but there is no action yet, because i'm fine i understand that as long as this government exists and those bastards who brought this government in, then nothing will change, nothing will be investigated . well, the cynical comments are also striking. here are the thugs. yes, our colorado is not ours. and so, when a woman speaks , we notice how some kind of emotional devastation of the citizens of ukraine is an investigation,

as it never happened, the culprit was not found and, probably, will not be, of course. uh, in principle, to add to the words of this woman who went through all this, including, and who continues to experience it all to this day so far in odessa, if she has left, of course, nothing has left. so there is practically nothing to add to her words. there will be no investigation, no punishment for those responsible for what happened for the murder, there will be no targeted killing of people on the air, no european institutions, no usula of the fondirlians, no commissions on human rights, of which there are a huge number of people running around the european union, so none of them will hit finger on their finger. it is not necessary. this investigation is dangerous and harmful. the main thing is not to go out with one on yourself. quite right, because they will come out. in the end, on their own. they will come out not only not on the perpetrator, but on the customers of this crime, therefore a full-fledged investigation, including international forces with the participation

of independent experts involved, will be possible only if the power is changed in odessa not only in odessa it is possible, but also throughout ukraine, the continuation of this topic about when people want the truth uh, hmm, i liked the commentary of the film director himself this one came out in the nineteenth year he walked. all televisions, as he calls them, are accredited, that is, the official media in germany told him that there is absolutely no time to stage this film, but there is an infinite amount of time for anti-russian propaganda, and people are stupid. these no longer want to listen and are looking for alternative sources. he says first his e to his film again revived interest. he notices it from youtube views and so on, let's hear from him. and only now, in february 2022, it was possible show the film in my country in the credited media, the screening is, of course, prohibited in february. people

started watching this film with a different view with wide open eyes, there is a misunderstanding of what is really happening in the world, there are a lot of questions. for this reason, the picture found its audience in germany, such a phenomenon. you have already described it. yes, sooner or later, sooner or later, of course, this will happen, but the closer we get to this moment, when the number of questions will rise just like that and it will be impossible to ignore it. so , for now. we are moving towards this moment, censorship, real censorship, so that we are not told that there is no censorship there , censorship is inherent only in our society. it is not true. so censorship will continue to run rampant, if allow me a very small example. that's just the topic of our german colleague, and at the annual festival, all of russia, which we hold every year. in the autumn in september in sochi , french journalists, our colleagues from ron, boduli donju, were supposed to be guests - these are colleagues who were in mariupol making

reports for atf-1 of the first state french channel. these are the authors of the very reports that, perhaps even accidentally, at first slipped on french television, which showed a fairly objective picture of what was happening in mariupol. how the azov people were outrageous there. and as people, in principle, were already waiting for the arrival of our troops and the army of the dpr in order for this nightmare to stop, they wrote a book about these days that they were in mariupol. highly very interesting, really saturated with textures, and we expected them at our event for the presentation of books, which were promptly translated, including into russian, and its premiere was to take place in russia hmm uh, at the last moment our colleagues had something that was forbidden go to russia but they were faced with a fact, that is, either a trip to the festival. more than a thousand people from different regions from different regions from other republics, including belarus, are present at the festival to their colleagues at the festival, so in front of them

the question was either tf1 very carefully under some pretext says goodbye to you, and then you go to the festival, or you just don't go. yes, arguments, what's good there, we wo n't even present the book we're going, but if we go just to talk with fellow journalists, don't talk about political topics. simply asking them questions, these arguments were also not taken into account, we were forced to communicate with our foreign french colleagues to present their book. here in absentia format through the screen. here she is notorious democracy, french military journalist. adrian bake arrived in minsk for the festival to personally present the film ukraine when eyes are open let's remind our viewers how a few months ago bake tried to reach out to the french public, talking about what he saw in bucha and donbas costumes. well

, in the cartoon it will fall. well, we look at the surname surname, something like that. dazi, yes, there's a hand garden right there. i managed not to have people here, to initiate everything

by the fact that we had to flee from france. uh, under fear of going to prison for 30 years, and recently in istanbul, according to him, two sbu agents attacked the tank, but he managed to miraculously fight them off. and here we see what timur vladimirovich looks like now. and you are planning as the secretary of the union of journalists of russia . still , he had a wife and six years in france. yes, he has a wife and a child. we are well acquainted, of course, we have met with him many times. so, with regard to the issue of interaction with him, i can say at the moment that work is already being done on this for certain reasons. we just can't talk about it in more detail just yet, but at the moment. you could say the next one is safe. i think that the issue of his status and his civil citizenship and his work

, including the opportunity for him, will be resolved. this is extremely, of course, important, as it is for any normal person to see his family. in general, his example, of course, is that that even we have now seen a short excerpt from his first radio interview. this is a very striking, very revealing example of a collision, and an ordinary, in fact, french european citizen in the good sense of the word, an inhabitant. but with the reality that exists in fact, not through the prism of, uh, french. european media, after all, he went to ukraine as a volunteer from the ukrainian armed units , you know, he went there from the very beginning, as he got there. he went there. ah, seeing what's going on there. he i really wanted to help people who are suffering there as a patriot of their country, and as a volunteer suffering. that's from something very bad from the aggression of the dpr quite right, and as

a result, faced with this reality. i think that it was just some kind of colossal shift in his consciousness, a complete revolution and, well, sincerely human. i wish him all the same this, despite the fact that physically he is now inwardly safe. still, to survive the inner, to overcome this upheaval of consciousness. this is also very not so easy. it is difficult in this film ukraine yes , since when the eyes are opened there are the same examples of journalists and the usa that surprised the audience very much. they are, well, in general, manifesters, yes, that is, we did not think that they could be so emotional from the scandinavian countries. there are journalists there who also went one at a time for one purpose, but then changed their minds, it was impossible to watch the flow of these monstrous fakes. and well, it seems to me that what is all this positive that our western opponents

colleagues are increasingly showing their true face, timur vladimirovich, you yourself were surprised that the french were not allowed to the festival. that is, we still thought that, well, democracy, yes, together we had such illusions that there was some kind of it, after all. i can't say that i was surprised much. to be honest, i was more surprised that until the last moment. we were waiting for their arrival. it surprised me, frankly, more of a last-minute ban. well, he was, in principle, expected, and i can say the following. with the start of a special military operation , a very interesting phenomenon occurred and it seems to me that it’s still useful, however strange it may sound, all the masks were completely and completely dropped, all those masks, all these m-m were thrown aside, these dusty slogans are already a hmm objectively and e independent person of the beloved freedom-loving western journalism, which for

more than twenty years, our colleagues at seminars at trainings at educational ones were simply stuffed from morning to night in all possible ways. it turned out that freedom of speech. it exists human rights. it certainly exists only they exist only for a very limited group of people in a certain form in a certain form and with certain economic and political interests, and for everyone else there is a choice. how is it for the fucker to either go there absolutely hmm a blind man blindfolded and face reality and shut up. forgive me in a rag, returning home, or asking for anything else, like the film the matrix 1 series, this cannot be compared when the main character is there, having eaten some kind of pill, choosing reality, he wakes up and understands that everything that he was told before , all this brave old world is beautiful around him with work with slogans with the pursuit

of some benefits, but it turns out that he does not exist, it turns out in fact. you really are such an hmm object for pumping money and loyalty out of you. you are needed as long as you are loyal, as soon as you are not needed. here, look at the face of the tank, who returned from istanbul and the choice of a person without a choice. that is a man without a choice. he said so about himself. of course there is, i'm not mistaken. here he is absolutely right with honor to him and praise for the fact that he understands this because of the fact that, well, in my opinion. this is how i see him courageously cope with this very often repeated. i am not afraid and caused the delight of our audience. let's take a break for a while, i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. suggest guests. we are in touch on the air again, say, do not be silent. and today our guest is

timur shafir, secretary of the union of journalists of russia. timur vladimirovich is against the background of what we discussed in the first part of our program. tell me whether belarus needs russia now new media and what they should be, they are absolutely needed, because the question is the battle for the consciousness of citizens. uh, perhaps, it won’t go away, nowhere at all in the foreseeable future, what i mean by the battle for the consciousness of citizens is that we have already managed to discuss this with you, but an attempt to fill people’s heads with anything. whatever propagandistic chekhova in order to further use them for their own purposes. uh, counteracting this is definitely necessary , given how quickly, how quickly technologies develop. we live in fact with you. we live in an absolutely amazing time. yes. this is 5 years ago. we still do not have the fact that they are nile journalists, just citizens of other professions did not have the technical capabilities that they have now. well, for now anyway, we have we don't know. what

kind of sanctions packages our dear non- partners will go further, but, nevertheless, for a modern journalist what is now called the universal convergent expanses, an amazing question opens up, how use these technologies? how to use them for good? how to use them in the first place so that you separate the truth from the untruth and give the most, possibly, an objective picture of what is happening to our citizens, who already have enough experience both in belarus and in russia to, at least having an objective picture, make their own correct findings. don't be exposed. here is the influence of this propaganda of information pressure from there. well, your colleague. uh, the chairman of our union of journalists, andrey krivosheev, has long been ill on this topic in an amicable way, let's say sick and involved. e to the project creation project, belarus history. i don’t know if you have seen any short animated videos about the

history of belarus that appeared on the net and instantly aroused some unprecedented interest of the audience, we will show our viewers one of these videos and continue the discussion. in 1595 , athanasius of brest was born in the berestey region, an outstanding falimist writer of the 17th century and a fighter for the rights of the orthodox in the commonwealth, he received a good education and served at the chancellor's court. including leo sapieha, but could not stand the morals that reigned at the top of power and decided to go to the monastery in those years, warsaw sharply increased the persecution of orthodoxy. she sought to plant a church union on the lands of modern belarus and ukraine. athanasius did not silently look at the oppression. the courage of his speeches was amazing, even the highest clergy arrested him several times by the authorities, but the ascetic did not give up his convictions in 1648, the

cossacks rose to defend the orthodox faith. bohdan khmelnytsky in response, the polish-lithuanian authorities began a cruel terror against the orthodox population. athanasius was arrested once again and accused of blasphemy against her. in response, the fearless monk threw the cursed punisher in the face, now your superfluous. they made money with them. athanasius was tortured for a long time, and then buried alive. well, before his death, he did not ask for mercy from his tormentors for the feat and exemplary fidelity to orthodoxy, the church glorified athanasius of brest in the order of the martyr. it should be noted that this is a joint russian-belarusian project and his presentation, it was said that he and andrei evgenievich krivosheev had already managed to defend 2 million viewers. e the right to

show these videos in the subway. although our opponents were already indignant and wrote letters. what is the point of showing such things to children, in general it is indecent, however, there is no need for children to know, but here you probably have a question of a different nature. ah, young people. what do you think? they generally it is necessary that we dance in front of them like that with a spoon fed. here are clear stories in such short clips so as not to god forbid, do not overload it or the man lost. no, of course not lost do. this is certainly necessary. and the point is not that we have been friends for a long time and, in theory, we respect them very much. andrei evgenievich, our dear colleague. well , this e product, which has just been demonstrated. i think he's just the same completely. this is what we talked about a little earlier, but the fact that the most compact technological formula is concentrated on the use of modern technologies young people, uh, young people, young citizens, young journalists, all

our youth of our republics. eh, banality. this is our future, without which we simply can not be imagined to say that we have lost them, nothing is needed with him . eh, i totally disagree with that. and the question is how not to pass it on. and how to make information that will interest them at least at the initial stage, so that later they begin to be interested in digging themselves. it's very big. this is a very complex issue, which, of course, requires not only, uh, the activities of some enthusiasts there, volunteers of this affairs. that is, not only at the call of the soul, this is a program issue. including here, there is nothing bad to warn, but program work at the state level, of course, including with funding. you know, for some reason we have again. over these 20 years, the idea has developed that to pronounce the word state

financing. this is something not very good. this is something not very correct and indecent always struck me. why is it possible to receive grants from the sender of other countries. and that's okay. it's fine. it civilized. this means modern, and getting grants from your government is something, almost indecent, all the more so. forgive me, as it were, we all know that our governments must report on financial grants. this is a much more severe headache than the excellent western programs. where it is possible in most cases to report there, with anything go to the forest with a camera to shoot something and write on a piece of paper our supervisory authorities in this regard, find fault and pester much more. accountability goes for every penny. it financing. these projects are needed. here it is necessary to help the state participation in this matter. eh, including creative talented people to implement this concept of our common future without this

support, the determining question worries me in this regard, that every time when some kind of supervisory authority is involved, it is called state bodies. they're not just trying to peek at the financial statements. well , keep track of the content too. and we understand that youtube has completely different laws, yes and in social networks, if there is a marking that it was made at a state-owned enterprise , it immediately causes this. well, the slight pressure of the problem, in general with digital platforms that do not belong to us, is one of the generally key issues of our informational survival, in fact, only after february 24, after the start of its own in russia in front of us in growth, it ended, it became completely clear. that problem of platforms, oh, which is very many years old. we all talked, we all discussed. we even funded a lot to solve this problem there with rukib with certain venues, but somehow

you know, somehow it didn’t come to that. and why, because, and why, and why unconditionally? we all know that one of ours. perhaps this is already some of our sacred symbols is the magic bird roasted rooster, which until it pecks in one place. we don't move anything. this is the situation where you can say both fortunately and unfortunately. in this case, maybe even fortunately, these are birds, finally flapping their wings and things have moved dead center, because in fact, in fact, we are all with you and andrey evgenievich and you are in the studio with colleagues and i are all hostages, we are hostages of these wonderful monopolists, who are familiar with the product names of the platform, which is familiar to every inhabitant of the earth until then while we are in such an informational hostage of dependence. yes move forward. it will be very difficult for us, but we need to move and solve this issue. it is necessary as soon as possible in russia in belarus in our allied number. well, just one more option. uh,

well, not exactly a solution to the problem, but an approach to this situation. well, well, let's say such mild conditions. yes, that is, the state provides technical support there, i don’t know the premises, but something else, well, a computer and equipment, i see. but the content does not control. it is achievable, as far as you think, it is achievable and there is no need to invent here. uh, some bike. uh, here the so -called public councils can play a big role, and i'm sure they will. somewhere they already exist, but often, they exist, either in the form of a formality of some sort , people gathered together after work or on a working day. something was discussed there. we will not part when these public councils will be really filled with people who are directly, but directly involved in these issues, who b - it's not indifferent. and when public councils understand that they really can influence the content in a

positive sense, this word can influence recommendatory. there somehow practically them role will certainly increase in this regard. i don't see any problem, it's perceived somehow as censorship anyway. here are some community tips. it still influences the content in some way, it does not recommend it in any form. this is what it should look like. how can this be done technically? well, it seems to me that potanin's project was successfully implemented in russia, for example, when it came to interior design. yes, that is, as far as show business is concerned, there are movies and so on, but with history, here is the socio-political content of the problem. always you were again until then. i say, as i said before, not yet life, not beyond. well, even, judging by the latest speeches by the recent several series of speeches by the president of the russian federation, and not paying attention to the issue and not paying attention specifically to the historical issue, the historical basis of all this work, but it will not work out. i think that

certain performances with teachers will also be made from this. yes, he met historians and spoke. well, how do you teach history about emelyan, this is pugachev there was some kind of uprising of history, i was completely confused. in general, he did not answer the president's question. well, what do we say next , you understand, if the teacher cannot answer a very big hope, i still put it on as they say, they harness us for a very long time, but they go quickly, including with recent discussions and changes. there , right up to the parliamentary level, bringing uniform standards, e. historical education in russia, the most important thing is to move this matter off the ground, it will roll further. just run after this stone and try to stop him, we note that it was you , too . and there is a small moment all these days, while we are in minsk, we are talking with our belarusian colleagues and, for some reason, they all have it. well, not everyone, of course,

many of them have such a moment. it is probably in terms of convergence, and the belarusian media are very far behind the russian ones. well , firstly, it’s difficult to compare volumes, yes , even technical possibilities are there, actual editorial offices there in russia in moscow and in minsk , for example, this is the first, and this second, even, if there is some temporary, there is a slight lacquer delay associated with an objective reason, it can be overcome much quickly, this is a matter of several months. not only years, because the trends are the same , practically the ways are the same. well, the third. i say that it is never possible to imagine a situation where someone alone teaches something only from his own experience. you yourself just said that you have already mentioned twice that, in fact, we looked at your place, this is very good since we are talking about history, about historical memory recently, in one of the comments, i read such an opinion when the submission of some information by our journalists, in particular

about the demolition of monuments, was discussed. let's say there in the baltic states in the same ukraine, and here is a man, uh, he was perplexed, why say? just as a fact, yes, that the demolition and resent the demolition itself, is it better to present this information in such a vein to look at where the eternal flame is still burning, and where there are still monuments and the memory of feats is honored . e red army men and soviet soldiers who died in the great patriotic war. people live better there than in those countries where all this memory is being destroyed. here we are, probably, in this, we should also think about how to present such information, including, i think this is a good move . any pandemonium absolutely agrees with this for me. this one, i don't even know how else. to call another struggle with one's own historical memory always causes me. well, to be honest, a very deaf bewilderment in this regard, just a good example are our inexpensive non-partners of the west, including the english parliament, near which there are two monuments, a monument to olura, a roof and

a monument to king charles, who cut off his head on this roof. they stand there coexisting quite normally, because both are part of a truly truly great british history. this is their basis, this is their roots, this is what their civilization generally stands on, they have not yet learned how to fight objectionable civilizations with their yes, by proxy, but with themselves, they don’t they fight, they remain this wonderful metropolis with unshakable principles, no matter how they present them to the outside. here. try touching the institution of the monarchy in britain. try sitting there for the rights of the british peers. try on the rights of the monarch, encroach. this is also a very common stereotype that in england a monk does not decide anything. let's discuss the partial mobilization of russia, which, of course, resonated with belarus last week, and one of our experts noted that perhaps it was a part. uh,

such a hype. yes, there are intentional loans from our opponents. you can agree with this, i can partly agree, because from the first day of the announcement of mobilization - this is already professional, we have come across a really large number of professionally prepared , targeted fakes related to the same mobilization. e from absolutely primitive, which were made operational there literally on the knee to really very high quality ones. e, in which a certain amount of funds were invested and which well, excuse me, were pierced only for very insignificant reasons, which, well, this, which had to be directly studied. that is, this fake had to be disassembled, that is, an unprepared citizen, which is practically practical, that is, an unprepared citizen who accidentally saw it. it's on the internet you can't blame him.

he can believe it is the first. why partly the second is unconditional, of course, during the mobilization, uh, a large number of errors and violations and bungling and all other shortcomings in ties with which there were already made, operational, including personnel decisions, some careless military commissars flew into the head there, certain changes are taking place in other parts of the russian ministry of defense, but nothing exists by itself and is not born from a vacuum. i have already spoken about this in minsk, including one must understand that russia is facing the mobilization of the military population for the first time since the forty-fourth forty- fifth year, when the last time these waves left on the mobilization of the great patriotic war war, it is clear that, despite the afghan company there, despite the civil war that flared in our southern regions in the nineties. in the north caucasus , mobilization was not carried out, which does not justify

those, fortunately, still a few military registration and enlistment offices who made mistakes and were not ready for it, but in any case understood the situation. it is also necessary. there is no silver lining. this is also being worked out in order to avoid similar errors in the future. well, here we are already learning from russia in fact. yes, the president has already given an order to look at russian mistakes and do everything possible so that we do not allow them if necessary. if suddenly something happens, and timur vladimirovich what effective methods of combating fakes, you would call it impossible to defeat fakes, you know how to defeat fakes entirely, to make them disappear. it's the same as defeating a core. that it is never possible to beat corruption 100% anywhere and in any society, but this is a separate issue to make sure that the spread of fakes and their negative impact were minimized. how much more is it possible? well, there's nothing new

to come up with. most. the main thing. the first rule is to limit the spread of fake news. if we talk, here are neo specialists who do this every day, to be honest, using some kind of technology, and citizens who receive some other creepy video or some information in the messenger. uh, please advice not to rush, immediately distribute it. no matter how, no matter how terrifying he looked, what would be terrible, the truth was not hidden in it. you don't have to send it. wait a while with a cool head to review it again. if this is a fake , something will definitely hook you there, something will definitely not be right there. if not, then you will be convinced that if this is a fake, after some time you will witness its refutation, but then again, you probably still need to look for information about some other sources, which again. dives this man is here that's right. eh, this is also a very interesting question. we have already touched. this technology has transformed the modern

journalist. here, well, in the terminators of some informational person who is armed with everything. i remember there 20 years ago. i was awe-struck by a colleague who, while on a business trip, could quickly type something on a laptop, scan it with a handheld scanner via a mobile phone and send it to the editor. it was the top. he could also take photographs. so cosmos was on a digital phone. now each of us is armed. each of us lies in the pocket of a small black box, which practically replaces. well, except for the typographic machine there, everything and that. if you wish , you can connect there with anything. the question of knowledge in this case is technological. this is a question of a huge responsibility of responsibility to the audience, to the citizens, to the country. i do not get tired of saying this, and i see absolutely no pathos in this. and here the question really arises who to believe, but technologies with a. almost all journalists are armed, most of them very many journalists, armed with such technologies, having received

tens of thousands of subscribers there, having created a certain name for itself, it begins to consider itself the ultimate truth. here, too, there are several ways. well, who should be considered a professional journalist? which edition to trust? which one you don't know. in my opinion, one of the criteria. this is the legal responsibility of the journalists or the editorial office if it is a very well technically equipped but anonymous block. well , how can you, you can infinitely trust him there, that is, absolutely trust the information that does it. second, you need to understand. how will a journalist or editorial office be held responsible if his information leads to something very bad, to panic, to a social explosion, to any kind of shock or just a car burned on the street, in a number of cases the same bbc correspondent called him to account, but he cleverly avoided it. so we are now talking about our collections, after all,

law firms there also work well. you know your bread is eaten from trusted sources, information has come to us, and think tank rent corporations in the us in the sixteenth. in the twentieth year, he prepared a report. eh, the loosening of russia, so he is called without cunning. and here we see from this table that we are talking about the sixteen-twenties to supply lethal weapons to ukraine. it was the most, a priority in general in terms of financial calculus and task. you see, what do you think, based on this table. in general, what is the goal of the gs7 company? well, here, it seems to me, everything is described here, very clearly and everything. described as closely as possible reality, first, randall us source. well, rent, the source is, which, among other things, serves the

united states department of defense and the military-industrial complex for a large number of years. this is a good analytical structure, on which, at the same time, there is nowhere to put samples of what is called for whom they work. this has long been known, everything is described here. but we see this, in fact , a training manual, a training manual of what the impressionable are faced with, in general, they wonder why mr. arrestovich, how events are predicted to the written word, there are two wangs of mister arrestovich wangs. this is a very interesting type, of course, he has many sources, in addition to rand starts. it 's just me to the fact that it's all in general. baba vanga or some predictions are written. you know the following table confirms. well , as a matter of fact, it is obvious that nothing of personal interest and priorities to me is, frankly, well, just here is the ratio of numbers. yes, finance, you know, what is still very interesting here. no, absolutely correct, absolutely clear table. it's very good here the interests and priorities are emphasized, who are not

europeans or citizens of europe, this is a particular group. well, what do you call it? her? what are the terms of the ruling oligarchic capital, which is currently led by james, and all the leaders of the current individual european states and all the leaders of common european institutions, there are not even those whom we see every day, it went to the fondaine in a barrel - this is all, basically, speaking voice. the first priority is finance economy. everything on this is based on the fact that citizens in the same britain was literally today. a lot of what they will be forced to do there for 3 hours a day, turn off the electricity to save just electricity, that they may be paid something for it. or maybe they will be fined. if i do , they will wash in their washing machines during the day, turn on these citizens, they are not interested, they are interested. here is this particular situation, how to

earn money on the death of dozens and suffering as quickly as possible, uh, with the benefit of yourself for your own pocket tens of thousands of people on the territory of russia belarus and ukraine if you get central asia and try to try as we all see it for business. let's take a moment. let's take a break. after a short pause. let's go back to this studio, while subscribe to our telegram channel. that's what it's called. say don't be silent. leave your comments. offer us guests, and look for all our issues on the youtube channel, belarus 1. on the air, say, don't be silent, and we are visiting the secretary of the union of journalists of russia timur shafir. we often say that russia belarus and other countries of the former soviet union should maintain a common cultural information space. well, i remember dmitry fyodorovich mezentsev in some huge allied media, effective and powerful,

where are the information guns and shells of timur vladimirovich. maybe you know what's the big deal with this? regret? i don’t know where they are now, how far they were. here the concept of information security has been exposed, how actively work is being done on this, but i think that like you. i know exactly the next this question to postpone it is no longer possible, because both russia and belarus now, in fact, regardless of the fact that we have svo, are going on a full scale in belarus we don’t have our own. we are in the same position, and none of our former dear partners. e with us. uh, how would it be so careful to say behave like a gentleman, even trying to pretend is no longer going to and will not be, and uh, the issue of our self-defense information, including security, it is in our own

hands. and in this situation, it is not belarus itself you can’t defend yourself, without russia it’s not russia without belarus, and it won’t defend itself here. right here here we see just such a symbiosis. i think that even our today's conversation on this topic, this question that we raised is one more such an additional brick, and in this e monolithic wall of the question, when will these pushkins begin to stand on this wall, finally, and they are essential. well, we also talked about the fact that over the past 20-30 years there have been, so to speak, tectonic changes in the work of journalists, but the principles of their work have changed, what are the main changes you would single out not technologically. we now mean we mean, which is so clear that yes. it doesn't stand still. and that 's the job of journalists. before, it was just objectivity. yes, we studied today so that you can tell which numbers are from the

magazine. the dough is required for a professional journalist, the role of his professional responsibility for the product for the information that he processes and conveys to the public has increased dramatically, what, well, in a wonderful vegetarian time there. uh, you could afford a lot, you could afford to treat something there. well, to be honest, there later, sleeves with some information, do not attach any importance to something. unfortunately or fortunately, as we also repeatedly said today today , the value of each comma in our time, each comma each with a phrase uttered on the air right now, has become much greater. uh, the consequences of their uh, become much more important and dangerous, so professional measures responsibility of a journalist. it seems to me , in addition to speed, as far as he is aware of it. yes, we repeat abstract responsibility, see discipline. it's something, it's something you were forced to say. you said close the topic and

and further responsibility is when you first of all form it yourself, of course, self-discipline, belarus, russia and ukraine, about which we also talked a lot today, are united by a single civilizational space with a smooth, well, century of joint historical living. uh, there will be peace when they just russia belarus ukraine we, in principle, let it not seem too pretentious to anyone. this is my firm conviction.