aries degrees the interests of all states and respect the principle that underlies, uh, security policy and belarus of russia literally since that very caribbean crisis. namely , that one cannot ensure one's own security at the expense of the security of others. but tell me very revealingly, what is now the main ally of russia and in europe is belarus, and here it is consistently in favor of détente. actually, what we will not say, but the period when the cuban leaders, on the contrary, spurred on. yes, something like this resolute actions and peaceful negotiations, which the president of the republic of belarus speaks about, and who was the first to provide them with a platform. how do you see the role of official minsk in the current conditions, because everyone understands that the role is officially minsk i am , first of all, as an ally of russia why

because this is a serious confrontation and either we will all enter into a rational dialogue together that will allow us to make a mutually acceptable decision, or we all together, including the united states of america, will find ourselves in a very difficult situation. i have naturally, there is hope that we will find a constructive solution, since it was e during the cuban missile crisis, but beyond any doubt. it should be on mutually acceptable principles to study, taking into account the interest of all participants. listen, it's very important that everyone refers to the cuban missile crisis as a positive example. what was the cuban missile model ? yes, uh, to the soviet union one morning i woke up and saw missiles in turkey aimed at moscow 10 minutes to fly to moscow but not against missile defense. what

do the soviet union, it creates a retaliatory threat by placing missiles in cuba, that is, it escalates. you think you have huddled, you have achieved de-escalation, that is, you have achieved the removal of the breast. uh, that moment is a model, it's a kind of model and a precedent, and a positive precedent at that. as my colleague says, when you go for an escalation, you raise the stakes, you create a retaliatory threat and, thanks to this, you come to a compromise. i do not rule out that such a model may arise in the current military-political conflict. here let 's literally turnip here. i think just the solution to these problems. that's how you say, yes, escalation, or rather, escalation of the situation. it is just not connected with the use of e-nuclear weapons for russia, it is primarily connected with mobilization, and not the mobilization of motorization into the army. houses with the development of the military-industrial

complex and what is closely connected with the nationalization of the elites who govern the russian federation, and that's it in my opinion. if this set of measures is carried out , this will become the solution that will allow not only not to lose. well, relatively speaking, defend your interests. how old is your competing plan? if you are addressing me as a citizen of the union state of russia and belarus, i think these questions are, unfortunately. we in the union state will have to decide very quickly, no more than a year, a maximum of two, and i can assure you that such a concept as mobilization in the republic of belarus has already been implemented. i understand

the ability of the state bodies of the republic of belarus and law enforcement agencies to ensure unconditional protection of their own territory, causing irreparable damage to any enemy who encroaches on our land on our world. well, then we will prove once again that both russians and belarusians. they take a long time, but they go fast. we have already left, and yes, colleagues, but indeed in the western press, and there is a lot of speculation about what real actions moscow can take and, moreover, to reassure the public, all the scenarios discussed are excluded. on the territory of ukraine although in their statements representatives of the russian leadership did not say anywhere that their warning applies exclusively to low-yield tactical nuclear weapons or directly to the front line. but before we discuss other scenarios, please display excerpts from the

nuclear doctrine of the russian federation and the principles of its application. four conditions for the use of nuclear weapons by russia, the first, if there is reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territories of russia or its allies. second, if nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction were used on the territory of russia or its allies, the third in the event of the enemy’s impact on critical state or military facilities of russia , the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of retaliatory actions of nuclear forces, and the fourth in aggression against russia with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. and that's why it's always here if yes, here the western press says that russia is determined to have a nuclear war. or, for example, the use yes, but nuclear weapons

are always meant taking into account today's international situation.

such power systems are not not on the territory of power in ukraine, but practically anywhere in the world, depending on which scenario will be involved. i would also like to say that russia has been in the west for many years. uh, they are often accused of allegedly adhering to the doctrine of escalation for the sake of d escalation, that is, russia is ready to increase the stakes, including the use of e nuclear e systems in order to put pressure on the enemy and force him to do it there step back and defuse this or that situation, but i it seems that the nikubin crisis, not what is happening now, does not indicate

that russia, in its strategic thinking, is there with this idea of ​​​​escalation, for the sake of de- escalation. i recall that in the sixty- second e, it was not the soviet side that escalated the situation in europe, this step with the dialogue, russia, but the united states is what the soviet hundred. uh, the union planned to do it here in cuba to equalize these nuclear ones, and the potentials of their threat and reminded me that really nuclear, uh, weapons after 1945 in doctrinal and in terms of everywhere, but was supposed only as a containment system. this is the limiting factor. is the threat of nuclear retaliation supposed to be a threat of credibility, and that's why we see how, uh, one other side sends signals that

they are serious? e refers to the possibility of using doomsday weapons, but every time everyone emphasizes that this will be done only if the fundamental interests and issues of life and death for a particular country are raised. eh, ri-rib. i want you to summarize today, a there is no even emotional complexity in the discussion, the discussion is complex. agreement, but i want to once again alexei anatolyevich let me down well. uh, by and large, the result emphasized one very interesting thing, that in general a conflict between the united states and russia as the two main nuclear powers is still quite unlikely, on the other hand. we see a huge amount of

talk about the use of nuclear weapons, including more tactical ones. very often, instead of arguments, we use the assumption we can expect most likely, and so on. this is a very, very dangerous path. thank you andreevich sergeevich, please, the final word is that it was impossible. last year. unfortunately , what seems impossible this year has become possible this year. unfortunately it may become possible next year, because therefore the responsible analyst and expert is obliged. e, looking at the current situation, extend the line from the past through the present to the future and draw conclusions not according to the principle. e hmm to calm everyone down and say that everything will be fine. this is a classic principle. yes, uh speeches of such public e, acting politicians. but still, to warn about

real risks and threats, but not to disorganize and intimidate anyone, but exactly the opposite, to organize and prevent these threats, which we clearly understand. thank you very much to all the participants of today's program. that was incredible. it is interesting and there is something to think about about to finish i would like to quote from one very strong and worthy to be reviewed now a film about konstantin lapushansky letter from a dead man. it's time finally admit that the whole history of mankind this history, protracted suicide. living matter, which cosmic chance endowed with the ability to think and which did not know what to do with this random fatal ability, period and did not find a better use for it, as the creation of the most effective methods of total suicide. sas is authorized to declare. threats of full-scale nuclear war between the great powers no, not yet. we

follow the sports life of our country, the star team dream team 7.0 has started preparation for the minsk half marathon 2022, which will be held on september 11, we will find out how new heights are reached, belarus by origin. pavel karnaukhov won the gagarin cup brought him home to minsk a good athlete differs from an average athlete, that he must always develop, always learn and move forward. well, in any profession. if you don't work hard at it, you'll never achieve anything. and how do you want to beat someone. if you can not run, do not jump, do not overtake your opponent and help to keep in shape, the training is aimed at the fact that we are working on something, improving and

improving the technique of this movement. we just need coordination. ladder and 10 minutes of free time, do not miss all the most relevant sports projects on our tv channel. let's start the morning together my morning always starts with a hearty breakfast, because it is very important for athletes to prepare themselves for a hard training day sounds great let's exercise and lightly. leaning forward, stretching the back surface and get useful tips to be always in good shape, but a full breakfast. this is a prerequisite. if you want the day to pass in a cheerful and fruitful atmosphere. i am always in favor of having a big, good and very full tomorrow morning, so buckwheat noodles are super and remember to eat such a pepper you can drink it down. no, watch the breakfast of champions project on

belarus 24 tv channel. in our project, we will show you unique personalities, for example, two hours in paris and i know paris, that is, i will come there, i orient myself absolutely calmly. i can be the richest man but you see, i've got this bozen gathering, maybe they break stereotypes with an example and their own experience. i don't have to feel something to break something. eh, something here, as if to try on the tooth. they thought i had poo-coo, in fact i had poo-coo. well, i'll tell you which one, in every issue of real stories. i had a choice either to buy a one-room apartment or to build stereotypes. watch on

tv channel belarus 24. good evening on the air panorama in the studio of ekaterina tikhomirova and sum up the results of this day an updated roadmap for a joint project and contracts for tens of millions, and most importantly , following the results of a two-day visit of the president to tajikistan