ballistov, who are familiar with the names of products, platforms, which are familiar to every inhabitant of the earth. that's as long as they have us in such an informational e-e logical dependence. yes move forward. it will be very difficult for us, but we need to move and solve this issue. it is necessary as soon as possible in russia in belarus in our allied number. well, that's just one more option. eh, well, it's not that the solution to the problem, but the approach to this situation, but well, let's say such mild conditions. yes, that is, technical assistance is provided by the state there is some kind of support there, i don't know the premises, but something else, well, a computer and equipment, it's clear but the content does not control. it is achievable, as far as you think, it is achievable and there is no need to invent here. uh, some bike. uh, here a big role can play and i'm sure they will play the so -called public councils, which already exist somewhere, but often they exist either as a formality of some sort

, people gathered together after work or at the end of the working day . there was something discussed we will not part when these public councils are really filled with people who are directly, but directly involved in these issues, who are not indifferent to this, and when the public councils understand that they can really influence us in a positive sense, this word can influence recommendatory. there, somehow, practically, their role will certainly increase in this regard. i don't see any problems. will it be accepted? somehow it's still censored. here are some community tips. he is still somehow influences the content in a way, influences the content in any way as a recommendation. this is what it should look like. how can this be done technically? well, it seems to me that potanin's project was successfully implemented in russia, for example, when it concerned the internet. yes, that is , as far as show business is concerned, there are movies and so on, but cistoria is the social and political content of the problem. always you

were were again until then. i say, as i have said, until life forced, but even judging by the latest performances by the recent ones, just a few a series of speeches by the president of the russian federation and not to pay attention to the issue and not to pay attention to the historical issue, the historical basis of all this work, but it will not work out. i think that a certain performance with teachers will also be made from this. yes, he met historians and spoke. well, here you are, how you teach history about emelyan, this pugachev was some kind of uprising of history, he was completely confused. in general, he did not answer the president's question. but what are we talking about next, you understand if the teacher can not answer very much hope. i put all the same on as they say, we harness for a very long time, but they go quickly, including with recent discussions and changes. there, right down to the parliamentary level, bringing food. the

most important thing for the standards of uh historical education in russia is to move this matter off the ground, it will roll on only run after this stone and try to stop it, let's note what it is? you, too, have spied on us, as well as the lessons absolutely. and there is a small moment all these days, while we are in minsk we talk with our belarusian colleagues and, for some reason, they all have it for some reason , of course, many of them have such a moment in terms of convergence, and the belarusian media are very far behind the russian ones. well , firstly, it’s difficult to compare volumes, yes , even technical possibilities there are actually editorial offices there in russia in moscow and in minsk , for example, this is the first, and this second, even if there is some kind of temporary, there is a small lacquer lag associated with objective reason, can be overcome much faster. it's a matter of months. not only years already the trend is the same practically the ways are the same. well, the third. i say it's never possible. imagine

a situation where someone alone teaches something only from their own experience. you just said yourself that i have already mentioned twice that, in fact, we looked at your place, it is very good. by the way, once again we are talking about history about historical memory, recently in one of the comments i read such an opinion when our journalists were discussing the submission of some information by our journalists, in particular about the demolition monuments. let's say there in the baltic states in the same ukraine, and here is a man, uh, he was perplexed, why say? just as a fact, yes, that the demolition and resent the demolition itself, is it better to present this information in such a way to see, and where they still burn, the eternal flame, and where there are still monuments and the memory of exploits is honored . about the red army soldiers of the soviet soldiers who died in the great patriotic war. people live better there than in those countries where all this memory is being destroyed. here we are, probably, in this, uh, we should also think about how to submit such information, including, i think this is a good move. absolutely

agree with this for me, any pandemonium. i don’t even know what else to call the fight against my own historical memory. it always calls me. well, to be honest, there is a very dull bewilderment in this regard, just a good example is our inexpensive non-partners from the west. including the english parliament, near which there are two monuments, a monument to oliver, a roof and a monument to king charles, who at one time had this roof, cut off the head, they stand there coexisting quite normally, because both are part of a truly truly great british history. this is their basis, this is their roots, this is what their civilization generally stands on. so far, they have learned to fight objectionable civilizations with their own hands, but they don’t fight with themselves, they remain this wonderful metropolis with unshakable principles, no matter how they present them to the outside. here try the institute of the monarchy in britain try

to encroach on the rights of british peers there. try on the rights of the monarch. encroach. this is also a very common stereotype that in england the monarch does not decide anything. let's discuss the partial mobilization of russia, which , of course, resonated with belarus last week, and one of our experts noted that perhaps it was a part. uh, hmm such a hype. yes, there are intentional loans from our opponents. you can agree with this, i can partly agree, because from the first day of the announcement of mobilization. it's already professional we've encountered really a large number of professionally, but made prepared , purposeful fakes related to the same mobilization, but from absolutely primitive ones that were made there promptly and literally on the knee to really very high quality ones. e. which were invested

quite a certain amount of funds and which well, i'm sorry, were pierced only for some very minor reasons, which well, this is which had to be directly studied. so this is fake. it was necessary to disassemble, that is, unprepared citizen, which is practically practical, that is, not a trained citizen who accidentally saw. it's on the internet you can't blame him. he can believe it is the first. why partly the second, of course, during the mobilization, uh, a large number of errors and violations and goofing around and all other shortcomings in connection with which there were already adopted, operational ones were revealed. including personnel decisions. some negligent military commissars' heads flew there, certain changes are taking place in other parts of the russian ministry of defense but nothing exists by itself and is not born from a vacuum. i have already spoken about this in minsk, including the need to understand that with the mobilization of the military population. russia

is facing for the first time since 1944-45 , when the last time, these waves of mobilization of the great patriotic war were going on, it is clear that, despite the afghan company there, despite the civil war that blazed in our southern regions in the nineties. mobilization was not carried out in the north caucasus, this does not justify those, fortunately, are still a few military registration and enlistment offices who made mistakes and were not ready for it, but in any case understand the situation. it is also necessary that there is no move without goodness. this is also being worked out in order to avoid similar errors in the future. well, here we are already learning from russia in fact. yes, even the president, he needs orders, but hmm, look at russian mistakes and do everything possible so that we do not allow them if necessary. if suddenly something happens, and timur vladimirovich what are the effective methods of combating fakes? you would call to defeat the fakes is impossible. you know

how to defeat the fakes entirely and make them disappear. this is the same as defeating corruption is impossible to defeat corruption, never 100% anywhere and in any society, but this is a separate issue to make sure that the spread of fakes and their negative impact are minimized. how much more is it possible? well, there's nothing new to come up with. most. the main thing. the first rule is to limit distribution fake. if we talk, here are neo specialists who do this every day using some kind of technology, and citizens who receive some other creepy video or some information in the messenger there. uh, please advice not to rush, immediately distribute it, no matter how terrifying it looks, no matter how terrible, the truth is hidden in it. you don't have to send it. wait a while with a cool head. review it again. if it's fake you're bound to have something something out there

will hook. something is bound to be wrong there. if not, then you will be convinced that if this is a fake, after some time you will witness its refutation, but again, you probably still need to look for information about some other sources, which again. loses this man is here that's right. eh, this is also a very interesting question. we have already touched. well, yes, technology has transformed the modern journalist. here, well, in the terminators of some informational person who is armed with everything. i remember there 20 years ago. i was awe-struck by a colleague who, while on a business trip, could quickly type something on a laptop, scan it with a handheld scanner via a mobile phone and send it to the editor. it was the top. he could also take photographs. this cosmos was on a digital phone. now each of us is armed. each of us has a small black box in our pocket, which practically replaces. well, except for the typographic machine there, everything and that. if you wish , you can connect there with anything. question

knowledge in this case is technological. this is a matter of great responsibility , responsibility to the audience, to the citizens, to the country. i do not get tired of saying this, and i see absolutely no pathos in this. and here the question really arises who to believe, but technologies with a. almost all journalists are armed, most of them very many journalists, armed with such technologies, having received tens of thousands of subscribers there, having created a certain name for themselves, they begin to consider it the ultimate truth. here there are also several ways. well, who should be considered a professional journalist? which edition to trust? what is not, you know. in my opinion, one of the criteria. this is the legal responsibility of the journalists or the editorial office if it is a very well technically equipped but anonymous block. well, how can you, you can endlessly there, that is, absolutely trust the information that comes from it. second, you need to understand. how will a journalist or editorial office be held

responsible if his information leads to something very bad, to panic to social explosion to any kind of shock or just a car burned on the street, in a number of cases the same bbc correspondent called him to account, but he deftly avoided it. and so we are now talking about our collections with you, after all, law firms there also work well. you know, they eat their bread from trusted sources, information came to us, and the analytical center of the american corporation in the sixteenth year, back in the twentieth year, prepared a report. the loosening of russia so it is artlessly called, and now we see from in this table that lethal weapons are supplied to ukraine, we are talking about the sixteen- twenties. it was the most e, priority in general in terms of financial calculus. you see the task, yes, what do you think, based on

this table? in general, what is the goal of the company g-s7. well, here, it seems to me, everything is here, everything is described, very clear and everything. described as close to reality as possible, firstly, ren gave us a source. well, rent, the source is, which, among other things, is served by the united states department of defense and the military-industrial complex is already on over a large number of years. this is a good analytical structure, on which , at the same time, there is nowhere to put samples of what is called for whom they work. this has long been known, everything is described here. well, this is what we see, in fact, a training manual , a training manual for what we are facing. eh, impressed. in general, they are surprised why mr. arrestovich, as an event is predicted to the signed one, there are two wangs mr. aristovich wangs. uh, a very interesting type, of course, he has many sources, besides the raid started. it i just mean that this is all in general, not a woman, vanga or some kind of written. here

is the following table confirms. well, as a matter of fact, it's obvious that nothing of personal interest and priorities to me is, frankly, well, just here is the ratio of numbers. yes, finance, you know, what is still very interesting here. no, absolutely correct, absolutely clear table. it is very good here, the interests and priorities are emphasized, who are not europeans or citizens of europe, this is a particular group. well, what do you call it? her? what terms of the ruling oligarchic capital, which is currently led by jason and all the leaders of the current individual european states and all the leaders? the european institutions there are not even those whom we see every day - it is usula fondullayn. a barrel is everything, basically a speaking voice. the first priority is finance economy. everything on this is all based on the fact that citizens in the same britain, literally today, were announced that they would be

forced to. there are 3 hours a day electricity switch to save just electricity that they may be paid something for it. or maybe they will be fined. if i will they will turn on their washing machine day these citizens are not interested they are interested. here is this particular situation, how to make money on the deaths of tens and the suffering of tens of thousands of people on the territory of russia by belarus and ukraine as quickly as possible, uh, to the benefit of yourself for your own pocket. us. let's take a moment. let's break after a little pauses. let's go back to this studio. bye. subscribe to our telegram channel, it's called say don't be silent. leave your comments. offer us guests, and look for all our releases on the youtube channel, belarus is one. on the air, say, do not be silent, and

our guest is the secretary of the union of journalists of russia, timur the driver. we often say that russia, belarus and other countries of the former soviet union should maintain a common cultural information space. well, in some huge allied media, effective and powerful declared i remember dmitry fedorovich mezentsev where are the information guns and shells of timur vladimirovich maybe you know what 's with this great regret? i don’t know where they are now, how far they were. here the concept of information security has been exposed, how actively work is being done on this, but i think that like you. i know for sure that this issue can no longer be postponed, because both russia and belarus now, in fact, regardless of the fact that we have svo, will leave on a full scale in belarus there is no one. we are in the same position, and none of our

former dear partners. e with us. uh, how would it be so careful to say behave like a gentleman, even trying to pretend is no longer going to and will not be, and uh, the issue of our self-defense information, including security, is in our own hands. and in this situation, it is not belarus that cannot defend itself, without russia it is not russia without belarus that will not defend itself here. right here here we see just such a symbiosis. i think that even ours with you today's conversation on this topic, this question that we raised is one more such an additional brick, and in this monolithic wall of the question, when will these guns on this wall begin to stand already, finally, but they are definitely needed. well, we also talked about the fact that over the past 20-30 years there have been, so to speak, tectonic changes in the work of journalists, but the principles of their

work have changed, what are the main changes you would single out non-technologically. we mean now we mean what so it is clear that yes. it doesn't stand still. and that 's the job of a journalist. before, it was just objectivity. yes, we studied today so that you can tell which numbers are from the magazine. it is simply required for a professional journalist that the role of his professional responsibility for that product, for the information that he processes and conveys to the public, has extremely increased, because , well, there are peaceful times in vegetarian times. uh, you could afford a lot, you could afford to treat something there. well, to be honest, there later, sleeves some information, do not attach importance to something. unfortunately or fortunately, as we also repeatedly said today , the value of each comma in our time, each comma each with a phrase uttered on the air, has now become much more than a hundred.

uh, the consequences of their, uh, become much more important and dangerous, therefore, the measures of professional responsibility of a journalist. it seems to me, in addition to speed, as far as he is aware of it again. yes we repeat theses you don't no no. no, the responsibility is linked, see discipline. this is something, this is you something forced to say. you said we closed the topic and further responsibility is when you first of all form it yourself, of course, self-discipline, belarus, russia and ukraine about which we also talked a lot today are united by a single civilizational space with a flat one, well, a century of joint historical living, but there will be peace someday we are not just russia, belarus and ukraine we are, in principle, let this not seem too pretentious to anyone. this is my firm conviction of yours, as a historian and amateur. we we are the real heirs of a huge cultural layer that goes back to the era of the second rome to byzantium even further and

further back there, uh, our entire civilization, both russian and belarusian and ukrainian, are based on precisely those principles that were laid down more than a thousand years ago, from this basis. we certainly have nowhere to go, in addition to language, in addition to culture, in addition to the latest history, in addition to religious carts. not seeing this basis, however. every day we feel him here this strong cement grip, so from peace. we're not going anywhere. the most important thing is that it be achieved as quickly as possible with the least losses. to my great regret, i don’t think that this is a matter of several weeks or even a couple of months, because what we are now facing on the territory of ukraine we are actually facing a civilizational taking over our common area. the capture did not take place yesterday or the day before yesterday. he took root there. quite a long time ago, those changes, including those in