remarkable and imbued with the spirit of history in the xix century. it was the most famous building in the city. there was a barber shop across the wall from it was a sausage shop and a local doctor nearby. ivan kleopasovich led the reception of patients to test his strength in pottery. he says that clay is very useful for hands, there will be no wrinkles. that is, the face will not be very good. yes, if i dip the pot, and, of course, have a tasty meal. well, the fish is ready, we get it? let's and the beauty? that's it, masha, let 's go tasting, my favorite pastime, what we are with you well done dmitry we caught ourselves prepared and we will eat it ourselves, to catch all this and even more, watch the program

the route is built on our tv channel. go fox your way were cunning and knowing you abdur. and his mechanics, our family of foxes, slandered the violin to me, when they bring the belarusian language to a child without tension, easily effortlessly. just translate the plot of your story into the language of puppet characters. so galina began to show her mini-performances in children's libraries. after a while it started

call from schools and kindergartens. and even from remote regions, grumpy grandfather. what kind of pancakes do you like and succumb to vulgarity, did you praise the forests ? and grandfather nah it was led. perhaps the goat is a smart goat, and she immediately crushed the conclusions that the fox is vermichitra. puppet characters speak only the belarusian language of many words. children do not know, but the meaning of the fairy tale is not a secret for elementary school and the belarusian language for many children is like a foreign language at home, they do not speak it, they do not read the books of their parents. so, look at performance a couple of new belarusian words. for galina, the children learn that this is quite enough ; correctly, russian belarusian, we have the right to choose, but i think that this

should be like our own. i think that this child, who stayed with me, he will come and take the belarusian book. he respects her. i think that there is some kind of link in this, probably . puppets for her performances galina she makes the basics of technology herself and spied a lot on the internet, and the doll herself dictates to think out. what the fuck is needed, so that on the one hand it corresponds to the character, and on the other, to today's time. for example , galina's woman turned out to be fashionable, modern with bright lipstick, just so that she would be on her arm, this is such a theater, bi-babol. so i came up with the idea that it was on the hand of the doll, dressed with the children. she was talking. that is, this is not just a doll, which is ready, which you need to take touch the arms and legs. and here it is on the hand, so that the doll comes to life. and here she was more like. here's how, well, here's a real fairy tale doll. having become a certified

teacher, contrary to the expectations of many relatives , galina did not change her profession, but remained to work as a nurse for an obvious question. why then was spent so much time energy efforts, she answers confidently. so it should be that she was able to make friends with each other two such different professions - work in a clinic. constant communication with people of the history of patients. everything goes into her piggy bank literary creativity. it’s enough for me to let roman mature. it literally takes me just one moment, it happens that i was talking to a person. really shares some history. literally, there is something like that . tell the hall, sincere. here is a very sincere one. he told me and i have already matured the whole novel . that is, i know what will be in this novel, and how it will end. here with one woman, she told how her daughter was in the hospital. hmm. and how hard it is. so she was going to see her and that’s all and came, and in

general, that’s before i got up, and she’s with me this shared not about the daughter and not about the woman. well , about these feelings that she experienced here. that's what pain, that's it, yes. i used it in some novel, and i have a whole plot that has ripened in a city big or small, ordinary people live, work as drivers, teachers, doctors, sellers, and almost everyone has a dream, which in their youth is still alive, still bursting out, and by adulthood it is usually retracted somewhere in the backyard forgotten and closed galina peruna an ordinary nurse from mogilev turned out to be an unusually brave person. she shattered stereotype that at 35 years old being a successful family relationship, held in his favorite profession. you can go into a completely different sphere and realize your old dream, without having a specialized education, to become a real literary author who writes

in both russian and belarusian, which is published and read that a writer is something like that. something so unusual and this is a completely different test man there is no writer, can be any person, that is, he can be a teacher, can be doctor. he may be, the main thing in his soul is that he be a creative person. so it seems to me, so, that is, one to the other. i don't think it bothers me.

this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. i will tell you right now. north korea for the first time in 5 years made a test launch of a ballistic missile over the territory of japan, a potential nuclear carrier weapons, flew 5,000 km and fell into the pacific ocean in response to the united states and south korea conducted test launches of missiles at sea off the coast

of china overcome the five percent barrier. there is a suspicion that this was a manifestation of the radically anti-russian course of the current government. the economic crisis continues to wear the government in europe, early elections are scheduled in denmark on 1 november, as in neighboring sweden, the center-right coalition has every chance to change at the helm of the social democrats as soon as the entrepreneur ilon mask in a series of tweets appealed to the leadership of ukraine with a call to strive for an early conclusion of peace and respect for the right of the inhabitants of donbass and crimea to determine their future, like millions of yesterday ukrainian fans. they anathematized him. and this despite the fact that

the complexes provided free of charge to the masks, starling provide the ukrainian army with access to the internet and play a huge role in coordination her actions, the unexpected peacemaking activity of the billionaire. observers associate it with the desire to outshine trump recently, who offered to become an intermediary between kiev and moscow. yes, the fear of mutually assured destruction turned the cold war period into one of the longest in the history of mankind without big hot wars , and many used to think that it will always be this way, this gave rise to the so-called strategic frivolity, when, in making key foreign policy decisions, the factor of nuclear weapons became completely be ignored, but this is a mistake and costly. she may be too expensive. actually, how

we can all avoid such a spectacle around the world and how great the risks of such a scenario are, we will talk today in our program . evening and sergey borisovich stankevich, political figure, candidate of historical sciences. thank you so much for being with us today hello and indeed. i would like to start with a rather direct and tough question: do you personally fear a nuclear war. naturally, i am afraid, and moreover, as an expert, i am sure that a nuclear war is very likely now. and this probability increases over time, well, do not be afraid of a nuclear war.

maybe just an irresponsible person, so oh, this prospect can not please anyone, but i argue that the whole talk about nuclear war is, in fact, the western information agenda. they are trying to impose this discourse on the whole world, and the likelihood of nuclear war. she, of course, may have risen, but not enough to blindly follow their narrative. yes, the people do not like to talk about big troubles, so as not to call out. the elites, after all, can afford to do this about the worst thing that can and should be said, what to prevent about why the terrible topic of the nuclear apocalypse has returned to the world agenda in our story, we look together. for the first time since the cold war, the world has again started talking about the threat of nuclear war, because the risks of such a

development of events have indeed increased the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki by the americans showed the reality and the most important consequence of the use of nuclear weapons by the united states as the only country in the world. she applied it , created a precedent and is now actively using it to intimidate and achieve her goals, although nuclear blackmail has also gone, it is not only about the shelling of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant encouraged by the west. what threatens a nuclear catastrophe, but also about the statement of some high-ranking representatives of the leading nato states of the possibility and admissibility of using weapons of mass destruction of nuclear weapons against russia , foreign ministers of belarus vladimir makein also spoke about the threat of nuclear war at a high-level meeting of the general assembly. he is in the new assembly an unprecedented level of tension and mistrust, entailing

an increase in the risk of military confrontation to make nuclear weapons and the threat of their use almost as real as they were 70+ years ago traditions to the process of nuclear disarmament of a multilateral and irreversible nature, however, such a scenario is unlikely to suit the west from the usa america has long made it clear that it is interested in the world only according to its rules and with its orders. and if this requires unleashing a nuclear war, then the end justifies the means. we feel that right now we have the capacity, the effectiveness, to contain and respond to any contingency, and to do what president biden strongly emphasized today, that we will defend every inch of nato territory as history shows, it is rarely a question of protecting our territories, take colonization. the indians or the endless wars yugoslavia libya syria afghanistan every time the us

published scandals and conspiracies for political reasons and for their own benefit the states have always used force to intimidate and impose certain thinking on other countries, nothing has changed. and now they just changed their goal, and alexander lukashenko noted that we know about systematic deliveries to the united states and other nato countries, through the polish airfield, have weapons and military equipment there every day. about a dozen sometimes more american transport planes to the states want to weaken and remove love from the international arena of russia and its allies to get closer to their main competitor china at the same time to increase the dependence of the european union on the united states if you see the united states does not go towards the european union america will destroy, as the

secretary of state said usa anthony blinkin washington has already begun to work out preliminary steps in the event of the possibility of russia using nuclear weapons. what are these steps? of course, they kept silent, but one point from the nuclear doctrine of the states can put everything in its place. the document says that the united states needs to make sure that potential adversaries are fully aware of the consequences of the first use of nuclear weapons, but there is also a reason for the failure in afghanistan, the economic crisis and the unsuccessful middle east tour, all this made biden weak political a figure, not only among the population and the opposition, but also among the democratic allies, who are most likely to lose the early elections to the congress, therefore, biden decided to play a new caribbean crisis. true, with the exception that he must emerge victorious from it. that would be a compelling argument for his voters. however,

the us government doesn't count on one thing playing with fire most often results in a fire. yes, indeed, playing with fire most often leads to a fire and it is important to note. and that fear has disappeared from the public space, andrey vladimirovich, which accompanied the final phase of the cold war, andrei vladimirovich. do you think that an incremental exchange of nuclear strikes is likely today, because sometimes you open the media with caution in the morning and are afraid to read something there according to how the stakes are. now it is so high that you need to be very careful not to let the worst happen. you are asking a very difficult question, which is not easy to answer from one side. i can say with confidence that these nuclear threat, the united states of america uses as a means of psychological pressure. as

, uh, a serious tool or weapon of mental warfare against their opponents in this case, uh, the peoples of russia and belarus . and here is the discourse that they throw into this space. after all, it was originally built on the assumption that supposedly someone would use nuclear weapons and the united states would then definitely answer. it's already a construct. this is already a definite turnaround. and this is where you need to look. e truth, second point, i support the opinion about what is the most sane part of the american establishment. this is, uh, the army leadership, and they understand very well what nuclear war means. and then who, in your opinion, does not understand, er, and his team. i

think everyone understands. it's another matter how this argument is used. this argument is also used as a cover, this element must also be taken into account, because an act was committed according to seidel, uh, two or three lines of the nord stream were destroyed by international terrorism, in fact. nobody doubts that it was implemented in the interests of the united states of america but the fact itself. uh, this terrorism needs to be covered up, attention must be diverted from it. as a result, public attention is switched to the threat of nuclear war. yes, just because of the simple discussion of this topic, the likelihood of a nuclear war. rather, the possibility of it increases, but still i believe that it does not exceed 2-3%. yes thank you. here i

would also like to note that there is a paradox and it consists in the fact that the best way to control the escalation. it doesn't allow it. now you see sergey borisovich an opportunity for because, unlike the caribbean crisis, when it was very difficult to build a dialogue, now there are all public methods. yes, to provide it, but this does not happen opportunities for diplomatic dialogue. just no, unfortunately not on the line, moscow washington is not on the line. moscow kiev, uh, though fortunately, uh, closed channels of special communication have been preserved, both between political centers and moscow washington and between military departments. e russia and america, these channels work, but they work mainly so that the parties can warn each other. uh, that's it, that is, there is no dialogue. well, there is no condition for effective dialogue. that is, where we

could not exchange accusations and threats, reach some diplomatic result. there is nothing in this connection, uh, the conflict is a military conflict on the territory of ukraine. and now not only, but the territory of ukraine is on the rise. i believe that the likelihood of using tactical nuclear weapons. in this conflict has exceeded 70% and will be above 80% during the coming winter. i would like add to our air to our discussion alexei anatolyevich gromyk director of the institute of europe of the russian academy of sciences chairman of the association for foreign policy research named after andrey andreevich gromyko alexander hello, i am glad to greet you. hello, thank you for the invitation, i have repeatedly come across the opinion that although the threat of the use of nuclear weapons is prohibited by the un charter, a clear

articulation by the respective powers of the conditions and scope of the use of nuclear weapons, on the contrary, can serve the cause of peace, forcing international actors to still be more careful and whether it is correct to interpret the recent statements of vladimir putin through this prism. firstly, i would say that there is no such ban on the use of this or that offensive system in international law . there are nuclear doctrines of all countries five countries on the official so-called nuclear club and the nuclear doctrine is public or not public e nine, but countries that have today, but nuclear systems, and we know that in history, and

nuclear weapons are military uh, purposes used it was yesterday of the nagasaki family in august of the forty- fifth year. since then, there is no e in the doctrines, none of the countries of the official nuclear club has written anywhere that e is a strategic nuclear e-e weapon, but is aimed at winning e in an e conflict, er, everywhere the philosophy of this hmm means. the e of the military is to keep the enemy from attacking e, his side. we should not forget that in the arsenal of many e-e countries, russia is no exception here. uh, there are a large uh, number of tactical nuclear weapons. and

here it must be said that today the situation is in some ways directly opposite to what existed during the years of the cold war, and when, on a confidential basis, the advantages of the soviet union in europe were on the dates, and now we have the opposite picture. when in conventional weapons nato in europe has a multiple superiority over the conventional armed forces of our country , and it is no coincidence that in the folds in the central storage in russia is e, the largest and the arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons from nine countries, and in this regard, of course, on our map yes, and alexei anatolyevich, here we

would like to demonstrate with our viewers so that they understand the scale of the disposition of forces, the number of nuclear weapons in countries and, in fact, on how many and where, it may be be located in states that border on one or another enemy state and the situation that will be for us will depend. to ensure peace or war sergey borisovich how can you characterize the current situation that is developing? well here, colleague alexei gromyko correctly pointed out the difference, firstly, in conventional weapons , nato's multiple superiority in conventional weapons and armed forces over russia in europe. and besides, also on the difference between strategic nuclear weapons and tactical nuclear weapons, of course, speech. now we can talk about the use of tactical nuclear weapons. i would even

single out another such subspecies of a weapon on the battlefield. such field nuclear weapons, that is, these are, uh, mines and artillery shells. in nuclear version, they fly up to 50 km. the distance is applied directly on the front line or on the middle rear of this kind, huh? more soviet-era funds have been accumulated. uh, the firing of their delivery is uh howitzers and uh, large-caliber mortars underwent serious modernization in russia from the seventeenth to the twentieth year after at the training grounds. they have been tested multiple times enough. successfully, however, nuclear charges were not used. and this argument can become the last, decisive argument if, in the course of a conventional military conflict , a threat is really outlined, e.g.

serious defeat that will threaten the existence of the state or other vital interest, and i assume. this is not my recommendation. this is not my desire. in general, i am a pacifist by nature, but i predict that it can come to such arguments as tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield, and if we turn to the topic of signals, the resumption of nuclear tests, andrey vladimirovich, can be perceived, and comment on this statement by sergei borisovich, because you do not you are a pacifist defeatist. i completely exclude the possibility of russia using tactical nuclear weapons. it is not possible where , relatively speaking, russia will use such a tactical grain of weapons, in fact, on its own territory, and according to the people whom the president of russia called the fraternal people. this is

a typical american substitution. here is an american propaganda argument which, unfortunately, is replicated by certain circles in russia, i can say with confidence that russia is never the first to use nuclear weapons to gain tactical superiority. on the field fight. i am well aware that russia is confronted with the potential of nato and that in ukraine the main conflict is carried out with the support of e nato states and they share and intelligence information and supply weapons, nevertheless. even nato is trying not to escalate this conflict, because they are well aware that this is a road to nowhere . if there is

a threat, there will be a threat. eh, so let me remind you of what e said, in fact president of the russian federation he said that russia will protect e not only the state of its existence, but also its territory by all and available military means. it's an obvious formula that includes nuclear weapons, uh territory. russia has grown in recent days and hostilities are taking place in this newly annexed territory. that is, it is not just a threat to this territory. this is military action and an attempt to return these territories by force from those that have gone from ukraine to russia, which is not a direct reason, corresponding the president's statement. and he didn’t say at all that russia was going to swing. e with this, but with weapons for every reason and in any case, eh, but once again i want to say e without this argument. uh, you can get drawn into a

conflict of attrition, uh, which in the end will really threaten the existence of the russian state and its integrity , the resumption of nuclear testing. it can be taken as a signal whether this demonstrates the determination of any state, because this is also on the agenda. conversations there were enough. yes, i predict that russia is most likely in favor of withdrawing from the 1996 comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty and that nuclear weapons testing at the northern test sites will be resumed. uh , tactical nuclear weapons, because they haven't exploded yet, and, uh, there will be a desire to see how they work. here is the step. this is already a step of fairly close time from my point of view. how true. that's what you think the current generation of western leaders are.