in other countries, which i started to vaccinate children in the first waves of vaccination, and began to vaccinate too. first from the age of 12. uh, then quickly expanded to many countries already from three years. some countries are starting and, uh, already practically there from two or infancy to vaccinate codes and this shows that children tolerate vaccination quite easily and hmm problems that arise after vaccination. no, how important is that same booster vaccination, they said today in it and how often it needs to be done, with regard to vaccination against blood, yes hmm and a booster dose is administered every six months, depending on the main course of vaccination after the first and second dose or after the next booster. that is, the present tense, while it remains so. uh, such a vaccination schedule, when will we vaccinate with a booster, but not every six months. what vaccine? will it be a

companion of the first component, or will it be a companion of the second component, or another vaccine that may appear on our market. today, there are russian and chinese vaccines on our market. i'm talking about comedy now. is there any plan to expand this list? it may be due to some others in the coming days, and we expect that it will enter the market. uh, the cuban vaccine collected plus and it will just be possible to use it too to carry out the exposed vaccine. removed from the city mitusni here is your karani and your strength is true, pirate cop. forgive

yourself. and tear off a special one. and when we get wet, tell the junction. skin croc and one not from nature. wild watchful own belarus over it

i

alexander semech director of the department of state lecture of labor of the ministry of labor and social protection today we will talk about the state of industrial injuries. hello this is the program say, don't be silent studio victoria popova and svetlana smolonskaya visiting. today we have alexander semechki

, an occupational safety specialist, and we will talk today about industrial injuries. hello, good afternoon alexander vladimirovich at colleagues. in us , youth recently read sad statistics for 8 months 22 years. the results of accidents at work following injured 1.089 people. and 101 died the most difficult situation in the agriculture industry housing and communal services. i know that you have what to add to these figures, there are already statistics for nine months. but first, add, if there is something, and tell me how you would comment on the data in general, if we talk about data for 9 months. that in the organizations of the republic for 9 months of this year, 1,252 people were injured at work, unfortunately, 112 of them died, which means that you correctly called the most traumatic types of activity in the republic this is industry. uh, agriculture and construction, well the figures are large total

injuries in the republic of uh in the twenty-second year compared to the same period of 21 years tends to decrease. but, unfortunately, yes, this year, following the results of nine months, there has been an increase in injuries, e.g. with a fatal outcome, if 94 people died in 9 months of the twenty-first year, then this year, as i said, 112 people, of course, this situation . well, it can't help but cause concern. let's explain right now to our viewers. what is the difference between an accident at work and a non-production accident, if we talk about large-scale in order for us to qualify an accident as a dishonest accident at work, we need three factors to coincide, a person, time, space is an employee. but speaking generally during working hours, he was injured on the territory of the enterprise, such an accident is an accident at work, respectively, it entails, as one of the consequences in the insurance payment for compulsory insurance against accidents at work, occupational

diseases. however, there is a situation when yes, an employee, yes, was injured during working hours on the territory of the organization, but such an accident will not be as far away as production. well, first of all, this is if the injury was received when the victim committed unlawful acts. well, he was stealing something from the workers. second, if the accident occurred during the commission of intentional actions to cause harm to one's health. well to unfortunately, there are cases of suicide attempted suicide. third. uh, when accidents are caused solely by the state of health, well, yes, the employee himself in the office died there from a heart attack from a stroke, and the fourth is when accidents are caused solely by the location of the victim. arise of alcoholic narcotic or toxic intoxication and the fifth situation, when an accident occurred when the employee did not fulfill his labor duties, or the instructions of the employer's official. well, for example a man, for example, brought from home to his wife to the factory, on his own initiative, went to the grinding machine, began to sharpen them, and at the same time

he was injured, all of these in all five situations. such accidents will be qualified. how unproductive. what is the difference in its legal status, it will be equated as an accident that occurred in everyday life, that is, no insurance payments, then a person will not receive compulsory insurance against industrial accidents about diseases in such situations. and tell me working time. here, let's say the path to work and the path will work. this is a working time or lunch break rule for investigating something accidental, cases of personal illness at work contains an exhaustive list, both in times of shaft and space, but answering your question. yes, uh under the accident rule. during working hours , during the time necessary for the employee to get to the workplace before the start of work and after the end of work to leave the workplace, this will also be included time for changing clothes putting in order personal protective equipment equipment and so on. in addition,

accidents that occur during the established breaks will be subject to the rules. this can be a break for rest and food, as well as a technological break and other breaks that are included or not included in the working corridor at work caught on the carpet fell broke the leg during working hours date, such an accident will be subject to investigation in accordance with the law , but the only thing then. as you asked, we will determine where she was going, if we chat to a friend, then maybe if the boss unequivocally such an accident would be qualified, as the performance is now, approximately all the data. i think that we have these figures that we voiced at the very beginning, and they correspond. reality or chiefs slope hide. come on, then, let's say this with a high degree of probability, and these figures are true. why is there a system built in the country that aims that's it for preventing a negligent employer from trying to cover up an industrial accident as soon as the

person enters the medical facility. if he says that he was injured at work, all healthcare organizations monthly, and such people who were injured at work inform the structural unit of the department of state labor inspection. all this information is verified. uh, if we are talking about the dead, then on a quarterly basis all health organizations, the department of state labor inspectorate and forensic experts of the state forensic examination committee holds top information on persons who died on the job. i think that there are such cases, and they are not few, when, uh, the employer says that the medical institution to his employee, what should he say? yes, they said absolutely correctly from my point of view, now, without the participation of the victim himself , it is impossible to hide an accident at work. well, a person must decide for himself. why is it about a similar situation with a salary in envelopes,

protecting your employer. eh man, uh, risk rudely, let's say our future. why yes the employer can say? let's say in the hospital that you got the injury at home, even somehow financially compensate for it. eh, what's the problem? uh, such a case, roughly speaking, will not be investigated as an accident at work. it will be hidden for 3-5 years. the injury that happened today. seems to be insignificant. it can lead to a deterioration in health, and then the employee will socially not protected, because it is unlikely that in 5 years this employer will remember his promises. and will this one still be hired at the same time, if the accident was investigated, as an accident at work, the relevant documents are drawn up. in a particular case, in production, the shelf life is 45 years, no matter how many years a person’s health deteriorates, when he gets the right to receive the fear of insurance has departed, in this case, i think we should talk about improving the culture of the employee himself, who legal. i mean a culture that should refuse to be able to refuse to its

employer in order to hide the fact of production, absolutely right people should, let's say so somewhere. it's even possible to show some courage to insist that the accident was why it's in his best interest in the first place, because , well, no one can say. what consequences will the injury bring, especially if we are talking about another brain injury and so on. okay, let's look at such a case here is the conclusion of the royal district in during the repair of the roof of one warehouse, and a worker fell and received a serious injury, the management had to take action against the perpetrators, but this was not done, that's how it is here. so, if uh leadership did not take action against persons, yes, apparently, who committed a violation of labor legislation on labor protection . e, resulting in injury to the employee in such a situation. this means that they do not comply with the requirements of decree no. 5 of directive no. 1, which contains requirements for unconditional prosecution in such a situation.

intervene department of state labor inspection. we punish the head of the organization. here is how you intervene. i'm interested. as you can effectively influence the director of a large enterprise, you can close and investigate. if this is the case for you in parts, we cannot demand the suspension of the equipment of the workshop, or uh sighted the enterprise, we are given the right to offer the manager. if we see that the sauce creates a real threat to life health. suspend. there, the equipment of the workshop or enterprise in its entirety, if within one days to the heads of the company, as you said, he does not agree with us, so we are going to court demanding the establishment of such a ban, which means from practice. in our country, thank god , this is an isolated case when leaders do not agree with our assessment. why because we do it very carefully only when there is a real threat to the life and health of workers. well, this is logical, because it is,

because if they don’t listen to you, and you go to court, but here a certain period of time passes and then dear. this is a certain period of time, the entire risk on then the head of the organization takes himself, and he must understand the possible consequences, because what they said, yes, the department is vested with the right to bring the head to administrative responsibility in the form of a fine, well, including due to violation of the requirement. labor protection. this is article 10-13 of the code of the republic of belarus on an administrative offense , the responsibility of the head there, well, is differentiated. it consists of three parts , part one is responsibility for violation. labor protection, which did not entail there are up to 20 basic units and part two, if this violation of the labor protection requirement published an injury to the employee, then the amount of the fine increases sharply to 50 basic units and still this is a very small amount. in my opinion, if we take into account that the person did not become, if the person did not become, then according to the results of

our special investigations, which are carried out by our state inspectors, all documents of special investigations, including goodbye, are sent to the investigative authorities committee. they already give if we are at the level of an administrative offense, they look at the level of criminal offenses and in the criminal code there is article 306 of the criminal code, which, if a violation committed by an official caused a serious injury or death of an employee, involves punishment . well, right up to the real decision of freedom why do people die in the workplace second after a road traffic accident? is the fall of the victims from a height, this is not a fenced opening - this performance of work in unequipped places to prevent this, again, compliance is necessary. uh, both managers and employees themselves of those labor protection requirements to which they are trained, this is access to the workplace only in permitted places. this is the installation of signal and protective

fences. this is the use of personal protective equipment. you said that the pre-trial proceedings with negligent. so to say, the directors do not practically reach, but there were such cases when it happened last year. yes, we had one in minsk region, one in the mogilev region. e thank you very much in both cases, the courts, stalin our side. that is, they recognized that the inspector's proposal to stop the operation of the equipment was absolutely justified, because there was a real risk of injury or death of workers. well , we repeat once again that in some cases we have a huge field. uh, the legal field in order to prosecute the leaders you said about it because if we say, well, there, if the pig, uh, the victim, well, everything is more or less clear. here's how to deal with the leaders here, after all, an individual approach to some kind of action or there is no exclusively legal field for them. no, no, of course, an individual approach, because in order to, well, in fact, this requires

a procedural enforcement code. naturally, all circumstances are weighed. specifically, whether the actions of this or inaction of this official, it was the violation committed by him that caused either injury or death of the employee - this is established during a special investigation. moreover, without fail, because such an official. in case of disagreement with the conclusion of the state labor inspector, he has the right to appeal against it, including both through the chain of command of the department of the state labor inspectorate and in court. somewhere there are, well, we must do it properly and we rarely lose. such trials judges, the influence you have today is enough. yes, i believe that, well, let's say the administrative resource of the department. well now it's quite enough to, let's say, regulate the process. besides, yes, after all, at our request in accordance with the fifth decree. the employer is obliged to attract. uh, your department's disciplinary officer last year. he

named drivers among the most traumatic professions in our republic. this report is available on the department of labor website. e. here, if, and god forbid, drivers die, and further down the list, a person at work and his family are entitled to a life allowance, or how much as someone determines in general earlier compensation for damage caused to the health of an employee was carried out on the principles of the civil code, that is, the tortfeasor was obliged to compensate for the harm, and the scheme did not always work. because, well, at least the subjugator of harm, there may not be enough funds to ensure that, from january 1, 2004, mandatory insurance against accidents at work and occupational diseases is introduced in the republic of belarus. each of us is now automatically insured when entering into an employment relationship, that is, when we we get a job, we don’t need to run to belgosstrakh with some kind of certificate and talk. what are you looking at. i work there, that is, any employee who performs an employment relationship. we are insured automatically, it concerns. this applies to

employees. all forms. actually. never mind. you work for a government organization in a commercial organization. all these organizations are required to insure their employees. moreover , one of the principles of the implementation of this type of insurance. this is a guarantee, the victim is entitled to insurance coverage meaning. for example, some negligent organization did not register fears, and there for a year or two it didn’t even pay a fee at all. but if an employee of this organization gets injured, he will get it anyway. the right to insurance payments, and then there will be problems. how will belgostrakh collect the amount spent with such a negligent organization, that is, in any case. here you said the driver is unimportant. this driver profession does not matter. everyone is entitled to insurance benefits. here, uh, answering your question. like you said life is not here quite so, because if an employee is injured. well, god forbid yes, he was left without a hand, if the darkness to him, well, obviously in such a situation , the percentage of disability will be established. well

, indefinitely, because, well, our limbs do not grow back. yes, how many people will be alive, and he will receive the insurance indemnity, if we are talking about the case when a person died, then his dependents will receive the insurance indemnity. uh, well, exactly as much as they are hdmi well, a child is under the age of 18 if he studies there on a full-time basis graduating from an educational institution there, well, this is decree of the president of the republic of belarus number 530 on august 25, 200. years, that is, everything is spelled out there, that is, yes, in this regard, both the workers themselves and their families are now socially insured. god forbid from getting injured e, or from the loss of a breadwinner. and if i want to insure in addition to what belgosstrakh gives i have for it, then it’s not my question a little. but as far as i know, yes, uh, the stravita state company is doing additional types, please. if the person himself wants very often i know organizations in which funds allow additional insurance of their employees.

including from accidents at work the state. this is the type of our compulsory insurance. now, just in case , this minimum guarantees everything that is in excess - you need to understand the same thing that this is a minimum, and then, when some kind of tragedy happens, you should also count here especially. well, how would you compare your risks. yes, at work with that. uh, yes, very often we have, uh, people do not conclude any at all. under the contract in this situation yes one must be aware of the risk. oh yes, helping the employer. there, to avoid paying taxes from the deductions of the fund for social protection of the population, and so on, a person takes on the burden of risk, which, if god forbid, happens to prove in such a situation that an admission was actually made, as a rule, only in court . and this , well, requires both time and either legal knowledge, or resorting to the services of a lawyer. good? you have already said that drinking at

work or coming to work drunk. this is one of the reasons for, say, injuries and accidents at work, but it is not an industrial injury. what is the general percentage? no, there are accidents. yes, when that's exclusively e finding the state of alcoholic intoxication. well , for example, the watchman drank so much that death came from the island by etching with ethyl alcohol. this is not an industrial accident , it does not fall into the statistics. uh, what greetings you have numbers here from memory, in my opinion, for uh, in 2021. in our country, 13.8% of the dead were in a state of alcohol drunkenness, that is. well, firstly, you need to understand that not always being in a state of intoxication has a causal relationship with an accident . well, a man is walking along the territory of the construction site, but a brick falls on his head during the investigation, it was established that he was in a state of intoxication, it is obvious that if he was sober, well, this brick was a

success anyway, yes, uh. sometimes drinking is one of the concomitant reasons, it is clear that a person no longer appreciates the danger, the wrong reaction, and so on. well what i said 13.8% of the dead. uh, last year were the state can not be called the main reason. no, i can give you an example. uh, that's in 2004. hmm, more precisely, it would be more correct to say in 2003, because march 11 , 2004 adopted the presidential directive number one, and some measures to strengthen public security discipline. well, with which, let's say, a large-scale struggle began. here with this bad phenomenon. here in 2003. in our country, 40% of the dead were in a state of alcohol unambiguously. she gives result. well, and, probably, if you deal with insured events, then if such an insured event, then this is also an individual approach, most often this is what we say. e, if the employee was

intoxicated. and this was one of the reasons. even if it is a concomitant accident at work. most likely, gross negligence will be seen in his actions. hmm, what will this lead to? well , the percentage will be deduced on the fingers, how much he is to blame for the accident and, accordingly, belgostrakh will reduce him by this percentage the amount of monthly insurance payments, and before we go on a break, alexandra vladimirovich, we will once again evaluate the risks. let's look at a short story literally and you will comment on it, the wasp that flew into the cab provoked an accident on the gomel highway and the traffic police told the details of the accident in the zhlobin region while the gas driver was distracted by an insect. after that, the van was on the side of the road, ran into a cable fence and overturned in an accident. the driver and passenger were injured and taken to the hospital. that's how the supervisory authority. you would here who was identified as the culprit, personally in the first place? yes, this is unequivocal, it turns out

an accident at work, because people were injured during working hours while driving. the transport of the tenant is obvious, while carrying it out it is obvious that it is not the fault of the tenant, not the fault. there are no victims. we have such uh in the region of 18% of deaths, when well, now we meet due to other reasons that do not depend on the will of the employer and the will of the victim this year, for example, well, one person died from lightning strike, for example. that is, it’s obvious that it’s not guilty here, it’s not an employee 18% of those, when it’s impossible to establish guilt, a typical accident is a typical accident, or when it’s well 18%, when it’s not hired, it’s not guilty it’s not guilty it’s not guilty, the victim still includes the unfortunate the case, for example, is common, and a traffic accident due to the fault of the driver is third-party organizations, that is, the driver of the enterprise did not violate anything, but because of a violation of traffic rules. let's just say the third side. he was injured, it is obvious that the victim was not to blame, and the employer also did not

allow any violations of the law. clear thank you very much. let's live today. i remember for a long time. we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. suggest guests we are in touch. on air say again, don't be silent, and our guest is alexander semechek, director of the state labor inspection department of the ministry of labor and social protection of belarus. please tell me who will investigate the accident, which happened to a citizen of the republic, belarus on the territory of another state. well, for example, with a trucker on a flight, if we are talking about the cis countries, then back in the ninety- fourth year, an agreement was signed by all state participants in the cis. said the traffic accident, and the investigation will be checked by the

labor inspectorate of the country in the territory that he was injured by the belarusian side will the documents of the investigation are recognized as similar if the russian will go there in transit, or will be sent on a business trip. e to the organization of the republic of belarus will happen to him here. injury investigation will be carried out by the department of state labor inspectorate under our law, the materials sent to the other side. uh, then and will be recognized, if the same accident occur outside. well , let's say the cis countries, then the investigation is carried out according to our legislation, well, by requesting the relevant documents from the police responsible for traffic safety of the side where the accident occurred, but in any situation. in any case, times. it was an employee who, during working hours, went to carry out assignments for employers. this will be an accident at work for us and, accordingly, the person will receive the right to those insurance payments, which we have already talked about in your practice

. our same drivers in other countries always know what to do. what certificates to collect e, certificates in such a situation, collecting either the department state labor inspectorate either to hire, that is, the worker himself, well at the time of injury. obviously, the person lying there in the hospital is still required and there is no punishment for himself, but in any case, on the basis of the conclusion of the competent authorities, we will call that the side where the injury occurred. there will still be an investigation and the key is to ensure that the employee is entitled to his insurance benefits. even if the carrier is some private company, it will not be possible to hush up anything that we said anyway as a result of reconciliation this accident will be calculated everything that will achieve in such a situation. this is plus an additional fine for concealing an accident on the track in our society. it seems to me that this is such an attitude towards inspectors or labor protection specialists, well, a little further ironic that these are people who read some boring instructions and ask to be

put in a magazine, they are chasing workers with this magazine. it is not known that they collect these signatures for some other duties. you could explain, after all, experts i agree that what you told me is not very common. yes, unfortunately, or vice versa, fortunately, everyone understands labor protection in medicine. yes, therefore , they look at the labor protection engineer with skepticism that i know everything, i can do everything. that's why you know there is such an anecdote that 70% of men phrase. yes, i wo n’t fix the intelligence myself, he’s already talking in the hospital, so you still probably shouldn’t take the labor protection engineer as a naz or a fly, it’s very bad if the briefing on labor protection in an organization is reduced simply to obtain signatures, general briefing. this is a pretty serious security measure. in theory, it should end with an oral questioning. that is, whether the employees understood or not, moreover, you will be surprised, but it is not the labor protection engineer who should instruct them

; well, consider this as a deputy, yes, director of labor protection. this person who should organize the process, that is, he believes that if organization. he believes that only an occupational safety engineer is responsible for labor protection in an organization, then we can safely say that work there is not organized in accordance with the requirements of the legislation, and such an organization is obviously not insured. god forbid from cases of death or injury to their employees. that is, it is not worth saving an organization on such a combat unit as an occupational safety specialist. it is definitely not worth saving, god forbid, if a person does not become the size of social harm, in general, well, you can’t measure it, but this is economic losses. these are hmm losses, prestige and so on, for example, here are western partners in order to work there with the west and so on. requirements are mandatory. yes, and certification of the quality system, including certification of the labor protection management system. why

because the firm that? well, he constantly admits in the event of an injury, it is obvious that something is wrong with the company, respectively, this company is unlikely to supply me with quality products, and so on. that is, in principle, this, well, lowers the rating of the company, including. competitive struggle, therefore, i would, well, not advise saving on the security service. here you are investigating. uh, the briefing was not properly conducted, who is to blame? uh, the person who was supposed to carry out this briefing, if we are talking about a primary job or a second one, then this is the head who suffered directly. let's show you a short story and then ask a question alexander zhuk 7 years old, as shinnik a position as a tire assembler, a place of work with a kgsha plant two years ago a new complex appeared here. it creates a rubber footwear for dump trucks. its diameter is 25-29 inches, the load capacity is up to 19 tons , thanks to modern equipment, alexander's work is now more mental than physical technique controls through the control panel

, the equipment is beautifully clean, but it is easier to work. well, new everything is here, as if everything is already thinking for you. the machine already thinks everything for you , automation has come to our factories. has the injury rate decreased due to this, yes, the injury rate has decreased, why? because, probably, the most effective way to prevent the impact of a hazardous production factor on a person is to make some distance between them to remove it. here you have given an example. yes, belshina is a large-size tire factory. eh, another such good example is, for example, what is happening to me now from this organization in the system of the ministry of forestry, when from a hand shaft and scaffolding they pass to machine felling , a person is already sitting in a cabin protected at a distance. that is, the case of the possibility that he will have here dangerous production fact. it is clear that the automation of the mechanization of the process reduces the

risk of injury, but it is an axiom in such a production that you can get minor sick leave, how should you hire in this case, well, minor damage to health. e, which did not entail disability in terms of the procedure for investigating particular cases such. this incident is called microtrauma. so let's say it. so it is investigated solely by the labor protection engineer by filling in the appropriate column in the register of accidents at work. so why is this being done? uh, the first one, because the safety officer needs to know that. well, the fact that a microtrauma could have been, and god forbid, an injury with a severe outcome, for example, a flying particle hit the forehead, this scratch hit the eye. this is already a serious injury, that is , an occupational safety specialist must know in order to take action, and the other side of the coin is an injury, which, again. yes, today did not even cause disability for one a day or more may subsequently e lead to

disability. e, there was a case from life when a piece of brick hit the head during loading operations, which means that he was not on the job. even for one day, an accident log was recorded after a year and a half, his eyesight began to fall. after 2.5 years. he was already a disabled person of the second group of sight in this case, the mreg gave the conclusion that most likely. this loss of vision is associated with that injury in this case, a person is drawn up an act of an accident at the production of a form n1 and he again has the right to apply to another fear, for obtaining insurance was recorded in this journal, then it would be very difficult, but 2 1/2 years later he proves in court that at such and such a time there was this a piece of brick was not good if the figures who remember, therefore, well, even here such a trifle, i would not advise you to return to the fact that our social

protection is first of all ourselves and we must. well, in general, to know some of your elementary bases. yes, amazing in theory. we we all know them when we go through the water briefing to us. it shows this, uh, in any labor protection instruction in the action in the emergency action section, it is mandatory that if you are injured or become a director, immediately, report this to your supervisor, that is, in theory. we all know this; the whole question is how we do it. i sprained my ankle on the stairs at work. i didn't think i could go and log this incident. it's true, it means they don't make up, the way you organize conducting instruction. wait. no, i ’m talking about the fact that i myself sat down, that i don’t know such elementary things that you need to go and in order to speak correctly in order to protect your rights, at least know the water. i have been working in the system of the ministry of labor with the protections themselves for more than twenty years. eh, in my opinion. the

legal culture of our citizens is on the rise. maybe not at the pace that we would like as employees of the ministry of social protection, but positive changes are evident in the faces of the employees. they know their rights better. and workers are brave enough to protect them and workers know where they need to go to protect their rights back in 2018 the ministry began to implement the concept of zero injuries, its essence is that uh hmm industrial injuries are not evil rocky not fate, that it can be preventable and avoidable, but at the same time at the beginning of the program and in the first part. we said that the figures we have here are inexorable statistics, it says the opposite, that the case of industrial injuries. they grow the concept does not work. so, well, first of all, since the age of eighteen. let's just say that the level of industrial injuries in our country is decreasing. i said that this year, even this year, our overall injury rate is decreasing.

unfortunately, the number of deaths has increased, which means that the concept of zero injuries, in principle, all these functions were performed in organizations earlier. they are just this time very comfortable. clearly and intelligibly even for a small organization in a structured, that is, roughly speaking at the end. well, here's a simple algorithm, what needs to be done, then the implementation of all these activities clearly helps to reduce injuries, but the problem. what is it, well, labor protection is such a reactive system. i mean, well, there is some temporary. luck is not allowed. here's something to do today. bach all tomorrow injury. no , firstly, not all organizations. they also joined this business voluntarily, and secondly, any concept, any labor protection management system, what we said, yes, it will fail if the participants in this labor protection management system themselves do not comply what is required of them here, let's say roughly offhand, almost 85, well, 80, let's say 85 p in different years,

accidents are caused in different ways either by the manager not fulfilling his duties, or by the employee violating these safety requirements, which he trained, that is, for us the first step. here in our country the concept of zero injuries, so that it has a visible effect. we need to somehow achieve self-preserving behavior for ourselves. to put it bluntly, in order to return the light bulb, we took a stepladder, they put a chair on a chair. here is even an elementary thing, yes, which we are all the time. yes, we have people do violate. at least that's it, if everyone just does it. here's what he needs, and then newer tools will start working. yes, here is a risk -oriented approach and so on, after all, it is not in vain that they say that labor protection rules are written in blood, because, well, this is very cynical. but after all, the experience of injury is summarized, the reasons are clarified in the rules , a ban is established that it is impossible to do this from these rules. they move into instructions on labor protection reaches the

employee. but this is a system when, well, let's say, we hit the tails. the current system. here is the occupational safety and health management that says, including the zero concept e, risk-oriented before how did he perform? you said that the case is voluntary to join the concept of zero injuries. this is a goodwill organization, but the obligation to comply with the mandatory requirements for labor protection is established by the law of the republic of belarus on labor protection and adopted by its development subordinate. now this is the duty of all employers, regardless of the form of ownership from departmental pecheniks. in your opinion. why the number of deaths has increased yet the number of road accidents has increased significantly. out of these 112 people, 29 died as a result of traffic accidents. a traffic accident is more. let's just say the sphere of road safety. that is, it is, well, not directly related to labor protection. that's one of the reasons, the second reason is that he called that

nine people who are in these 112 are people who worked without any kind of formalization of relations at all, it is clear that when we say that a person is allowed to perform such work. without formalizing the relationship, it is obvious that in such a situation no one is watching. does he have the qualifications of any training briefings testing knowledge on the protection of the body, for example, they cited. as i understand it, it's all accidental and such hired workers who saw it for the first time from excavators and climbed onto this roof on this roof in the same way in minsk yes, in august. i don’t know here either, probably they read that two people climbed to repair the roof of a kindergarten. the propane tank exploded. here they, too, were not in labor relations with the company that donated this blood. he's under investigation now. eh, obviously, what are these people? well, at least they don't know how to do this job safely. i occasionally see events in the press such as zero injury week.

it's like this for me. compare a day without a car there, something like that. you know denominative, well, practically none, usually at this time, uh, first of all. e. we say, there is an organization in some area, training seminars with leaders of occupational safety specialists. this is the activation of the work of mobile groups to provide practical assistance. this is an unscheduled briefing on labor protection with employees in order to once again remind them of safety requirements. i mean, well, it's not just stretching on the street and that's it. this is a sir set of events. and as a rule, such events are held under the auspices of regional executive committees for example, mogilev grodno region. there it is carried out in general at the level of the region, that is, it cannot be considered that it is simple, well, some kind of action in the rosformation is everything, that is, a rather serious complex. let's take a break for a while, i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. there you can subscribe to offer us guests and leave your comments. we're in touch. on the air

say again, do not be silent, and in our studio, the director of the department of the state labor inspectorate of the ministry of labor and social protection alexander semeevich, such a question, if there is a difference in the investigation of accidents at work in the republic of belarus and in the cis countries, of course. uh, if we say, for example, in the cis countries, uh, first of all , these are countries such as russia kazakhstan well , i just know the best of their legislation, a first of all, they have, uh, the rules of investigation are an element of the labor code and, accordingly, their actions apply only on the labor relations of the republic of belarus, the law on labor protection in the same degree protects both persons performing work under labor contracts and under civil law contracts, which have recently, well, been quite common, therefore, unlike, for example, the russian federation, we will conduct

an investigation. even if a citizen, performing work under a civil law contract, is injured, and he is again liable. on insurance, in addition, i believe that our rules in russia still exist. yes, how else, starting from such times, the commission conducts an investigation, which means the commission from my point of view vision, which blurs responsibility a little badly. here we have a special investigation of a particular case conducted by the state labor inspector of the department with the participation of a representative of the employer trade unions yes, but he is personally responsible for what he writes to conclude from my point of view, when we talk about personal responsibility. this is much better, because the commission is still something a little amorphous. well, i was kind of against it, but in general the whole commission voted for our inspector put his own the signature on the conclusion perfectly understands that if anything, it will be a predicate. i do. are you that our citizens are better protected? it's hard to say better or worse. i'm just talking about

the difference is that we are trying to ensure the safety and social protection of not only citizens working under labor contracts. well , according to the civil breeds contract. and this, taking into account the spread of the institution - in our country, in my opinion, in the region of 600,000 people a year in one form or another work under civil law contracts, i have in mind, well, a person, for example, can work at the main place under an employment contract, and somewhere, well, there in the evening or on vacation, earn extra money. that is, it is enough, well, affects a large number of citizens and of course, to ignore. such a layered population would be absolutely wrong. well, at the same time, we know that you often visit the russian federation and participate in international conferences to exchange experience. did you manage to peep something, uh, let's say positive and progressive from our neighbors, what can implement in supervisory activities in our country? yes, you know, here, the russians and the russian federation already have such a right

enshrined in law. we still say so use it. well, just getting started is the right of rendering. a warning, that is, the federal labor inspectorate, having received an appeal to a citizen, for example, that his rights have been violated there , it does not come out for verification. she simply writes a letter to the employer explaining that, based on the citizen's appeal. it looks like you violated the abc there, we invite you to voluntarily eliminate this and inform us. uh, so the russians have it written in the law. and if in such a situation the employer voluntarily eliminates the violation , informs the rostrud inspectorate of this, no administrative measures in the form of fines are taken against him. that is, well, prevention in its purest form. yes, the inspector did not have to go anywhere; there was no extra check on the rights of workers. restored by employers. not fined. well, everyone seems to be happy. here. in principle, i heard this form of work, and we are now thinking about how to incorporate it. well make one of the shapes

department work. i mean do. well, in practice, we are already making such timid attempts, but we have how to legalize it, because in reality the form that suits us too, taking into account the limited resources of a person, because the rights are restored, well , the employer, because he did not have to, then go to pay a fine. so i think this is such an interesting form of work, in any case, which, well, probably has the right to be introduced, and in our country these attempts should then be made more boldly. let's ask you a question if allow not only from injuries at work. well, for example, and the delay in salaries. what to do? how to look, hard -earned employers, if payments are delayed, if we are talking about wages , then definitely, yes, here you can safely say this phrase is under the constant control of the government of the executive committees of the ministry of labor. why are departments doing this? well, that is, these are not empty words. all organizations are tracked by large averages according to buildstat. this is the simplest

due to the well-established exchange between departments state labor inspectorate, social security fund, committee of the state committee. the unions help a lot. the ministry of tax collection is exchanging information, well, about such organizations that they are paid salaries. this means that the simplest thing can be done by a person who has not been paid a salary. well, the first thing is to contact the structural unit of the department of the state labor inspectorate. the addresses are on the site, that is, i mean that it is not necessary to write to minsk. you can correspond to the same department, which means the department state labor inspectorate within its competence. well the form can be chosen. this may be assigned a check of the required documents. in any case, the information will be verified by the employer and the employer will require the elimination of violations. well, if there is a violation will be brought to administrative responsibility. so the second way the employee has the right. e. so, if the employer gave him documents that have e hmm that there is a debt to apply to a notary to make a notary

entry, and then it becomes executive document, a person can go to enforcement agencies . well, the third way is a man. you can apply to the court to protect, let's say, your economic, how many months they are not paid or at all, which means that the salary is delayed even for one day compared to the established contract, or the collective agreement is already a violation. that is, in principle, a person on the second twenty-fifth should have paid a salary of 26 money in the account. no, he already has the right to collect to apply to the department. these are all forms. so actually any form. just uh, let me give you an example. just yesterday i found out from a neighbor's daughter that she worked as a waiter in the summer. today, october ends yet the restaurant has not paid. well, you said work. well, here's the first question. eh, in general, some kind of relationship was formalized. well , of course, i am sure and sure that it is not civil law. the fact is that if we are talking about a person who works under a

civil contract, this is no longer a salary. this is a reward. and here it is already foreclosure exclusively. in a judicial proceeding, because these are norms that fall out of the labor code and is regulated by civil labor code very often to us unfortunately, yes, people write. i worked under a civil law contract, but they don’t pay me a salary, and we begin to explain that it wasn’t your salary. and the reward there is a completely different mechanism man again. yes, concluding, now i am entering into some kind of contractual relationship with the organization, i must clearly understand whether he signs an employment contract or under a contract, or he signs a civil law contract and other relations. this means you can year to read. yes remuneration the fact is that, well, first of all, uh, we have not seen civil law in a row it does not say when remuneration is theoretically paid at all. i can write in the contract that you owe me. well, i don’t know, but to glue this newspaper table here. uh-huh, i sign

a certificate of completion with you, and in the gpd, theoretically, we can, if we agree to write about the remuneration paid within a year. after, for example, signing e, an act of work performed, from the point of view of the civil code, once in a party so agreed no violation. no, if an employee has a wage arrears, he can go to court within 3 months. uh, since the day he knew he was being violated. uh, the norm of a three-month period is set in the labor code of the republic of belarus, you will all consider one more case, let's say this is also a sore point. the employee wants to quit before the expiration of the contract by agreement of the parties, the employer does not want to let him go. how to be here. how to find a compromise, just look for a compromise. why because a fixed-term employment contract? ruby sides agreed. as an employer , i expect you to work for me for another 3 years . you suddenly come and say, i found a better interesting option.

the first. you can agree on the second option. yes, you can demand termination of the contract, for example, if there is respect. cause well, for example, here is the explanation of the prisoners of the equal court recognizes the move to another area for a good reason. but then if the parties did not agree, the next instance voluntarily. well, it's just a trial. why because this agreement of the parties implies that the two parties have agreed? uh, for some reason early to break through the relationship, that is, here already, well, no intervention of supervisory authorities is initially excluded. if, for example, the employer did not fulfill some of his duties there, then the employee simply quits not by agreement of the parties, but demands termination of the contract due to the employer's failure to fulfill his obligations under the law. we would work on labor protection. here, the department is competent to establish such a fact . state labor inspectorate, trade unions, or the court, the agreement of the parties is an exclusively contractual process, which requires that the

two parties come to an agreement usually. yes, the employer is not just like that, well, extremely rarely, sometimes the director of the petty tyrant will not let go. what is it usually about? wait. yes , give me a find, therefore, well, it’s clear, if suddenly it comes, this morning the worker is so all tomorrow. i want to quit , it’s clear that the director may be against it, but you are on the side of the employer, and we are always on the side of the employee. let's do it, and the department uh exercise supervision compliance with labor legislation on labor protection, we are clearly not an institution to protect the rights of the employer. uh, the main function , after all, is just we are talking about overseeing violations of labor legislation on labor protection, and most often we still violate them carefully, so one of the functions of the department of this restoration is violated, i feel most often most often unequivocally. uh, the former guessed that you are prone to professional deformation paid attention

for shortcomings in our studio. but yes. you have had to deal with a work injury yourself since a work injury. no, i, apparently, managed to get all my injuries in my school years. that's where i broke my hands and got burns, so at work, thank god, no, although let's say my work, i started praying to engineers as a young man, but in labor protection, how they came, well, my father worked in the hereditary site asra in labor protection back in soviet times, when trade unions were engaged in this. well, so this is somehow for me. well, somewhere a little bit, probably hereditarily. and why do you love this profession, in my opinion, but in the old testament it is said who saved from one person. saved the world, well, i still think that our inspectors do their daily work. well , at least not significantly. yes, let it not be so, the injury reduction curve that we wanted. well, what it is. i believe that our inspectors are also responsible for the service. well, probably to some extent. maybe my contribution also affects this,

probably the most yes, that's terrible, what can be it god forbid yes, that's present at the funeral. here, speaking, here we are talking about a person who died at work, if you draw a portrait, as a rule, a man is 44-45 years old. that is, it is obvious. yes, someone's son, someone's husband, someone's father. well, if we were able to ensure that all our employees came to work today. healthy left healthy, then, i think it's great. it's worth working for. thank you for this conversation very much new interesting and useful. we learned from you today. i hope that for our viewers conversation was also helpful we are svetlana smolonskaya. victoria popova say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now alexander semechek is speaking, summing up everything that has been said. i would like to say once again that, first of all, our safety depends on us, in order for us to return from work healthy and alive , something colossal is not required.

knows how and what she is trained in thank you i wish you all happiness, and most importantly health. we follow the sports life of our country during a difficult period for the entire belarusian football, it is important not to be satisfied with the moaning of something to undertake the construction of such stadiums. this is an amazing phenomenon and the quality of football will increase transmission, please

let us know more, more precisely how new heights are reached. physical abilities and self-control and help to keep yourself in shape, but after all, moderate physical activity helps to cope with many problems. million sports tips check each one and use it better don't miss all the latest sports projects on our tv channel. what you can do while traveling, see the sights and feel the spirit of history in the 19th century, it was the most famous building in the city . a hairdresser worked here through the wall from it there was a sausage shop and a local doctor nearby. he was taking a patient to try his hand at pottery, dangerous newcomer. says that the clay is very useful for the hands, there will be no wrinkles on

hands. that is, the face will not be very good. yes, if we are a pot, and of course, a tasty meal . well, the fish is ready, we get it? let's beauty everything, masha, let's go tasting, my favorite pastimes, what you and i. well done dmitry, we caught it ourselves, cooked it ourselves, and we'll eat it ourselves. to catch all this and even more, watch the program the route is built on our tv channel. this is the pulse movement. breathing is the rhythm of life. fashion illustration is the art of conveying fashion ideas in visual form honey, is that a dinner spoon

? new theatrical forms copyright reading classical works searching for sacred meaning we are in a new place every week, watch the fashion for culture project on wednesdays on belarus 24 tv channel.

live main news at noon with you pavel lazoveko. hello