the treasury tone of brussels in all matters the alternative is similar to one exit of poland from the eu parliamentarians trade unions in belarus continue monitoring throughout the country to actively go on raids on shops in different regions began after the president signed a directive on the inadmissibility of price increases in the spotlight, not only large cities, but and trade in the village today in the geography of the vitebsk region, the capital again, the minsk region on the eve of the location for verification became and ratomka here is dominated by convenience stores , despite the small area the assortment is quite wide and most importantly, the prices did not change on october 6th. this applies to both public and network and private outlets. new information my colleagues at 15 o'clock on our air all the best. a project of

real heroes of our time nnye i am cool, charming, attract with a beautiful smile. we invite you to a computer game where everything is real muscle, but no, which one of you? i am helios as a superhero. i give people, e, light, warmth and hope, difficult trials and genuine emotions, in order to overcome those obstacles today, they need to use skills are not 100, but 200% heroes and the main chris, see the heroes project on our tv channel. we fell, we will not chop up the new day and

robin is music to our music. i'll crawl in the sun, in not timid hands, on the tips of our fingers, music on the stumps, tempting us to think and opening up thousands of roads before us, music can change color on kolki i'm flat look at us music inside our skin.

hello welcome everyone. who is with us now, extremely busy, anxious days, strikes on the crimean bridge, missile arrivals on critical infrastructure of ukraine, the statement of the polish leadership about the views of american nuclear weapons zelensky on preventive strikes. yes, in general, the nuclear topic has ceased to be a taboo and has firmly established itself in the political information flow in one franchise, just as the world has come to the point that we are already playing the nuclear topic. so for a starter, there is simply an open confrontation, then even more so a confrontation between the nuclear superpowers or the great powers, whatever you want to call it. well, listen, it's no secret. and we talked about it a lot they say, and what is going on is a struggle not between russia and ukraine, not even between russia and nato, but between russia and

the united states, these are the two largest nuclear powers, if the stakes are constantly rising, it is already a question of how to divide russia, how to weaken it? how to defeat, the question of nuclear weapons naturally arises, this is almost the most that happened exactly 60 exactly these october days 60 years ago during the caribbean crisis, but for now this rhetoric here we are, when we analyze we must see indicators, indicators of what is really about this is being spoken or not. look, everyone is talking about nuclear weapons, but russian officials don't talk about it at all. this time. whether these people believe in it or not, look, they say everything is russia. now, after the raisins , he will use nuclear weapons, while the american embassies continued to be in kiev. uh, the western embassy, ​​including the american advisory missions, and so on, it cost russia to strike with conventional weapons, that is, with missiles

, at the ukrainian infrastructure. immediately announced the removal of the embassy. what is it about says rhetoric escalates the escalation deliberately trying to provoke the military of the russian federation to these new steps for what, in order to have international pressure on ours, including the union state, and in order to continue to throw the ukrainian people into this bloody meat grinder key events, of course the last days that we are all discussing. this is a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, and he , too, threw off his masks with uh, mmm, that's according to the principle of who is our friend who is someone else's we saw how high-ranking western and diplomats and the leaders said how they reacted to this, in fact it was a terrorist attack, followed by strikes on the critical infrastructure of the kiva and other ukrainian cities. and now the experts immediately started talking about the fact that everything is a new level, firstly, do you agree that

this is some kind of new level of confrontation. and if yes, then what is the essence of this level, which went to the side of what you said about looking for from here is quite true. and in principle, this indicates the level of political thinking today. especially western. how next. that is, more tension, more misunderstandings, and more and more to leave. let's just say that some kind of reasonable policy for today is the policy of western states. she does not suffer from any prudence at all. they no longer suffer from this prudence. it 's only mentally some deviations go and the girls. not only that, i can say today that such things are already allowed. uh, yesterday, for example, it passed that he needed to remove two members of russia and china, respectively, brother, all of the security council. he, well, yes, ruined the whole international security system. now we still need to crawl through the secret ballot

, we must see who then to punish the speech by a pleasant representative of gazprom , the french representative, who led the meeting of the security council, simply did not allow this to be done. i mean, we just see. uh, comes with dressy ones. these are the political things that fully influence the military-political situation today. she escalates. i again use tactical nuclear weapons. this is not a very interesting topic, at least that the united states does not have tactical nuclear weapons in europe. there is the most low-power bomb, which is in the us nuclear warehouses of the us army, only this is one megaton, this is not a tactical nuclear weapon, but a tactical nuclear weapon is one and a half 10 kilotons, one and a half to tenths of what is available in this weapon e of the russian armed forces and that's all and therefore to bend this topic about the use of non-use, what

you scan and they try to even remember how not, russia will attack. well attacked created the principle of a special operation that allowed it to solve its security issues within the framework of some military operations. i would like to add that hmm the behavior of western countries. it is not just the unconscious conscious that we see this conscious escalation of the conflict in europe. the united states of america is extremely interested that this conflict not only last. not only longer, uh, the stakes in this conflict have risen, but so that as many european countries as possible, as many and as deep as possible, are mired in this conflict , moreover, the european union is already hearing voices understanding of this literally this week, a number of european officials said that how is it possible, against the backdrop of the energy crisis that is now happening in europe, that the united states of america is selling us four times more expensive gas that we used to

buy. this is the first second promotion. these rates, of course, must be stated that they are special. the military operation that russia is conducting has moved to a different phase, which means it’s completely different, this can be seen not only from the personnel changes that took place in the ministry of defense of the russian federations but also in russia's tactics, e, the stakes are raised and mobilization is carried out and secrets. there is no more than that, uh hmm, there is also an informational effect here. remember literally a week ago, and especially after the crimean bridge was blown up, how western and ukrainian propaganda said that russia was losing everything. look, we are already blowing up with impunity , the crimean bridge. on monday, the whole world saw that it turned out to be far, far away, to put it mildly, far from reality, moreover, the european tabloids were very outraged ukrainian propagandists by the fact that, firstly , they wrote the truth that the attacks on

the ukrainian infrastructure were a response to the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge and the minister of foreign affairs. ukraine urgently tried. edit all the world's media what do you write? this is not so, but the world media, by the way, did not succumb. they kept writing it. this very effect is not kind of like rejoiced. but what did they create? say - here they made a mistake, they all began to rejoice to write on twitter there, how happy they are with the population and they they saw this and created the first feeling that this is a terrorist attack and that ukraine is behind it and russia has the right to a legitimate strike. it was the general feeling. eventually. now let's go to bed. here are the kulebs - in general, you represent the minister of foreign affairs as a disgrace. ukraine sits in the hotel says, as someone blew his brain. he says, i do n’t know what’s going on in kiev at all, says the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine yes, it happened in general , then they began to rewind. this is all they say. here, they were so happy all the beginning of the brand were photographed and said, no

it's not us, because they looked at the mood of western citizens. they say so. you are right that you fucked up the infrastructure. and what do you want? you hit the bridge and you will be answered and, by the way, very important processes are taking place in the west, influential people. people like elon musk and not only he alone began to say things, understanding the position of russia, understanding this argument. it is no longer marginal. there are retired politicians, some analysts of the second fifth category. this is a person who enjoys more authority than many european leaders combined. let's see ukraine was a very revealing list, because the ukrainians expected much more support. she didn't get it. even biden, when they talked and said that if you then go complain that he says to select weapons next time, but at the same time, e, let's have more, but let's get back to this and

listen. and what kind of statements? the fact is that the white house makes extremely contradictory statements, it seems that one head, says one thing the second is completely different. here with one side heard the united states is not looking for a conflict with russia and will not send troops to ukraine biden. he made it clear that this is very clear. the united states also does not want the conflict in ukraine to acquire a nuclear dimension. we heard no reasons for this, and immediately after that , the united states does not exclude anything in the issue of supplying tactical missiles to kiev. well, bolton , too, he got into such an informational mainstream. this is an ex-adviser to the president of the united states on national security, and putin made a statement as the president of russia is a key person for the russian army. it makes it one of the targets on our list. well , probably the icing on the cake. in this case, this is a statement made by the nato camp before the speech. and meeting with the defense ministers of the alliance, stoltenberg generally takes off his masks and

calls everything by its proper name. russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine will be a defeat for nato ; this cannot be allowed to be a direct participant in the conflict. it's not a secret. and what the secretary general said. nato was clear a long time ago, and not only the united states, but practically all western countries, and the entire nato alliance - these are more than fifty-two countries that are now opponents of russia for the second moment, while yesterday a voice was heard from france where the minister of astral affairs of france said that we cannot refuse contacts with russia, we should continue the dialogue, what is it to talk about? i also support france's case that the western elites are also divided, the united states of america is now raising this aggressive rhetoric and raising the stakes in the war, one of the goals is to force europe to continue to be united in order to act in the interests of the united states, but interests in europe are well, not quite different. they are completely different. in this case, we are all talking about the elites about such global snakes, and the people yes

, people who have long understood and disassembled, judging by the comments in uh, in social networks. they have been for a long time. well, they took their side, how they treat refugees from ukraine, yes, that is, against them, how much they are opposed, that is, people cannot understand why military operations are concerned about russia there, ukraine does not care about the lives of citizens of european states and the citizens of the states and the united states of america were left behind, that is, all the means that when there was an emergency in florida, yes, then they said that there was no money on the doo flora much less than the amount it ukraine please. yes, yes, the threats to us are growing. now we have to focus even more on that. and what, why do we differ. you already said what happened. some strange unhealthy intoxication in ukrainian society. warmed up, of course, but also by propaganda and the

kiev regime. what did they start talking about? so it turned out to be the crimean bridge, or should we not make the crimean bridge 2-3, and so on, separated by a comma, the president of belarus has been collecting for a week. ah, the power block. eh, here each moment parses separately. we see that he keeps his finger on the pulse, and specifically about these intoxicated people, he also gave a completely clear signal. let's listen to a fragment, then we'll discuss it through informal channels. as far as it was, perhaps we were warned by him to strike at belarus from the territory of ukraine. well, as we stated let's make it so that it will be the crimean bridge, 2 my answer was just bring it to the president of ukraine and others. the insane, if they are still there, that the crimean bridge will seem like flowers to them. there is only they will touch

with their dirty hands, at least one meter of our territory. i would like to comment on this by the fact that today about the southern borders of belarus, 15,000 groups of the armed forces of ukraine have been formed and are clearly working, only the armed forces of ukraine without starts, without uh, the national guard and other armed formations and the same, uh, the same border guards when although they say that in general, there are belarusian border guards, that the border guards stop, and the parties have already fled, and drunks go there to work out, firstly, all bridges are destroyed. on the main directions of access to belarus, moreover, almost the entire territory was mined, two entrances and exits were left. and this is all increasing by militarization, again of the west. why is it that today the original grouping of troops of the forces of e is unfolding and unfolding,

numbering about 5,000 people, these are the belarusian and russian armed forces, which will stand on the western borders, because on the other side 2/3 of the polish ground forces are already concentrated at the borders. belarus 2/3. this does not mean that 25,000 us military personnel are still stationed in poland yesterday , but zelensky's proposal before the heads of j7 to invite international observers on the ukrainian belarusian border, as he said. here's some kind of design. well, you know, in my opinion, medvedev is there about zelensky has already spoken and i don’t want to repeat the words, but it was or. it’s already being slipped on him. they’re slipping it on him, you understand, this is one question that he himself no longer has , that there is no reasonable solution. here, uh, the first one. i want to comment on two points president. why is the biggest risk right, about which we are now talking about the possibility of strikes of some kind on belarus, this is the complete lack of independence of the neighboring countries that

surround us for days, ukraine or poland is not lithuania the same, unfortunately, to ask who, what of these countries, if it is necessary for the americans to throw them into the conflict zone, no one will now about zelensky’s first application zelensky is absolutely not an independent figure of the peace guarantee from zelensky is worth nothing, like any of his words that he said lately. did he say it himself, i doubt what the risk is? what kind of troops does he invite to observe on the border, belarus nato so for us this is for us another concentration of nato troops on legal grounds on the territory of ukraine close to our border, and we will believe. and how many times we have been deceived over these 30 years, or and now we will take it and say. we believe, we believe that you, if you want, good goals are generally immune here, in general, at the word of a foreign foreign observer, we immediately understand how they will observe, which our citizens and the countries that surround us should clearly understand everything that we are doing now . here are

the president’s commands to strengthen the border, to strengthen the grouping, to deploy the russian belarusian grouping, just the same, aimed at the world, aimed at so that this lack of independence of these countries is to neutralize the threats from them why so that those who actually make the decision see what consequences their rash actions can lead to, because the rules for preventing war are the same, the stronger you are, the less likely there will be a war with what you are if you get weaker, they will destroy, by the way, the president is right, holding one meeting after another publicly, sending generals, uh, to a briefing with the public in labor collectives in general. so unusual. and why is this being done? it war prevention line. these are the actions of creating an allied group. we show the enemy. first. we all know your plans. well, you understand that if the military people see that their plans are revealed , preventive actions are taken, but why should they climb on the horn? they will suffer

losses and not achieve, we see these plans as a result. we, uh, convey clear, open information to society. right now, when somewhere the russian society criticized the ministry of defense. why because the information was coming, uh, not in a way like this it should have been, and naturally certain problems arose in connection with this. here, it's just out in the open. uh, the top military leadership comes, uh, to collectives and talks to people. but i would n't underestimate e's independence here. uh, some line of his own, which is being pursued more. the same baltic states and ukraine they are cunning. i don't know for sure, for example. the application, which zelensky solemnly signed to nato, he himself came up with or was prompted to, there are some moments there. he was also denied and this was refused in general, and this could have been predicted with regard to the invitation, the so -called observation mission or the international mission, as he said. well, this is

one of the reasons for the advancement of the same polish troops. and here one can argue about the concentration where they stand here, of course, because their main four formations are three mechanized divisions, it is the so -called armored 11 tank. they are constantly moving, that is, getting closer to the borders of the southern state. all boundaries between states. not so they are here they are, as the president said he takes away for 100 km, for which, in fact, several battalions of regular polish troops are already in ukraine in one form or another, they simply don’t use a battalion. there we already see that in the course of hostilities on the fronts. soldiers show up. well, there they are on vacation in britain. therefore, they are moving like this, and now conditions are being created for the input. with what is it dangerous in the share of the hot border hot borders, and ukrainian will be nato troops, that is, any clash. that's

what our military was talking about, when these same taroboronists or border guards come out and aim at our side, it can lead to some kind of armed provocation, that is, they deliberately want to expose their european allies to the americans under attack, but there is one nuance that americans will not stand up for them in this case. now, if yes, now, if, for example, there was a provocation even on the belarusian lithuanian border. this is the fifth article of the nato charter without question. and if on ukrainian territory, then you are the poles and ukrainians understand. we ourselves will supply you with tactical ones. and so all these, and so these kms yes , for 300 km, which are a magnifying glass. and so on, but i myself agree wow, but i don’t believe at all that the united states will stand up for anyone in europe at all . they both sat overseas and will continue to supply weapons and spray them never this article five. it is necessary to create this joint grouping, because many of us see how they interpret. although the president look, and the day before again

generals lieutenant, minister of defense of belarus viktorovich is fucked. e, he clearly said that the task of the regional grouping of troops is purely defensive, and all the activities carried out at the moment are aimed at adequately responding to actions near our borders. well, it seems to me that as a person not a military man, yes, that is, from a different point of view. this is a normal situation in order, first of all, as already mentioned, to show that we are ready for any development of the situation and, on the other hand, well, to prevent panic among the population republic of belarus and the network is a panic. remember yesterday, yes, on all channels that it may be, a viral mailing from viber that strikes were inflicted on minsk, no one panicked, absolutely no one talked to. everyone smiled and said, well, of course, that is, we should not panic, but the polish side has already sounded good several times. uh, the president, in principle, he also touched on this topic, including, communicating with the military, these are the words of the duda that he said

. at first, he lamented, what can i say? not we have nuclear weapons, nothing portends that we will soon have our own and why not negotiate with the americans so that their nuclear weapons end up on our territory. here's how you feel about it you answered called your own question. at this remark, the poles again want to get something else to tear with someone else’s hands, at the expense of someone who, without substituting themselves, so that they will be given everything. they will again put forward the poles are playing their game, they want they want from germany, which means nuclear confrontation weapons are an attribute of the great wood, they pushed germany aside and now, with the supply of nuclear weapons, their largest military power will make their occupation say, as soon as we declared this lie, so that it would be reconnoitered. so, as soon as we announced that we were deploying, as soon as we

said that we were deploying our grouping, they immediately handed out the words to buy. and the first thing people should know is the grouping is provided. not now. it is provided for by the union treaty, which was signed long ago. and the second thing they say about the occupation is those where nato stands dozens of times more than ours. that is, this is not an occupation for them. when they have troops on atabases for decades, they build new ones, they ask for more and more new bases, there are no three soldiers in the foliage of their soldiers. all the rest. what do they expect. it's just more time. here are three four figuratively speaking, and on the elevator with the general. and the army is descending, they are all counting on nato rotan, and when we act, the allies will occupy us, so who is occupied? it is you who are occupied. you do not you can't make any decisions on your own . you cannot defend your country. you cannot not impose sanctions, when the americans tell you, and you say occupation. here it is necessary more here. do you agree with these experts, then he says that at the moment poland has already concentrated so much in western

weapons that it has the opportunity to consider offensive concepts even regardless of plans. they still need time. they do plan to expand their armed forces to 300.000 approximately three times. well, on average, the military budget of poland and the annual increase. they are purchasing not only the stipulated 6 billion dollars. you imagine for the purchase, abrams tanks, they will even have k2 tanks and south korean ones to buy, poland is planning. it has been stated. that's where everything about hymers and they say you know. how much hammer to buy 500 pieces of launchers. well, they haven't been around for a long time . basically, so many. and they still need to be produced. it's a few years they'll do but really what's the goal so that poland, here we are talking there in ukraine, and so that poland can alone , without the help of nato allies, conduct military operations with limited goals, but on a regional scale. uh, doesn’t it automatically do that, and poland, uh, a

country of a solid red line for, for example, russians in general. that’s the word red line, we’ll forget, yes, it automatically turns into a threat, which is, accordingly, which is one’s own hands, as you can think of and out of the blue to inflate the escalation. here is alexander ivanovich knows here in our doctrine in our plans what term is the suvalian corridor? no at all, yes, and it does not make sense. well, for you to understand, kaliningrad is our northwest between them there is a space that separates up to 60 km, sometimes a little more there. more from the baltics and suddenly, out of the blue, we are not conducting any exercises in this country, the poles with the baltic states, with the support of the americans , are inflating as an incredible threat. they say that an american military base should be placed there. this is when trump started, let's call her fort trump this base. duda there, kneeling or bowing to trump, begging this base to be placed,

no threat at all. there is no concentration of troops. in this direction 10 years ago. is it really the first time every year when russia belarus conducts exercises? every year we discussed in this studio fakes in poland in lithuania that we will attack lithuania tomorrow, we will attack poland, moreover, the ordinary exercises that took place with us, which have nothing to do with even to them sometimes did not have, and these terrorist threats. sometimes they worked out a fake right away, like tanks tanks this week. well, this fake bro again, remember that supposedly belarus delivers through the burden to russia tanks yes , russia has enough of its tanks, you already wrote that the shells will run out one day russia bombed shells. no, the second day is bombed by shells. no third day to bomb. they say it's over now. and today, an american expert wrote the truth, he says, you know about the box office. russia, even if it doesn’t produce them for half a year, can bomb every day, and they produce the same thing about fakes about us, the teachings are correct, he blazed good

and will be when the topic of the suvorov corridor appeared, when the baltics were taken over, and before that, there was no topic from the uaz in the corridor here oh well, well, you first created a problem, and then let's solve it, they are money all the time. here the russian tanks will go, in 2 hours they will join the leningrad region of the joint grouping. and uh, we heard that the minister of defense said that in the near future we will receive more iskanders and s400s and related personnel in belarusian territory has already completed a full course of study , this, well, is able to sober up those who are now let's say so. they will increase the military security of the allied state. naturally, including, belarus is just an increase in security, military security even today. yes, we kind of have polonaises, here, but the addition of iskander i s-400. by the way, it works with 400. just as part of a training center where our

military personnel were trained. he works in combat training mode, breaks into a chapter from zelensky yerma when the president said about dirty dirty hands. he first tweeted there, and then immediately deleted it, because it was explained to him that belarus had something to answer. the fact is that i am the dostaevsky regime that is afraid of the polonaise. there 's an interesting point. they hesitate. here they are performing. there are some of these all sorts of arrests and other podolians there, yes, well, the belarusian army is weak, not combat-ready, and so on, they went to the azerbaijanis. they asked about the planets. they also have all said strong missiles. they mean, polonaise is the most afraid of them now, because even in russia, a whole legend is being created around our polonaises that this is some kind of superweapon, they are really afraid of them, but they are doing the right thing to be afraid, because in addition to polonaises we have point launchers, we have tornadoes. we have hurricanes. that is, something that can strike, er, irreparable, both in personnel in manpower, that is, in

the equipment of the group that they plan to concentrate. well, what are the states, and 300 km, that is, yes, here is an example of monotonous in different configurations, but , uh, a border grouping. we guaranteed to destroy, no matter how they swagger. this is the second time. they also do not set the goal of an invasion by a large group now, because again they are talking about their successes there in september. but they understand that they cannot. well, even these 15,000 are not the group that can not parry. together, our group is an allied state, so they are betting on hybrid invasions of these plans. the ministry of defense and the kgb revealed this pressure on the belarusian society, in the style of rights, and you were demolished by a quarter or like bulak balakhovich acted to invade, arrange terror, seize some settlement and the borders, let's talk about it, but for starters, so that before we talk about it,

we must lead the concept, which, in principle, is already well known, but our military . i think the audience took notice. recently , more and more often used. here is the term proxy war. we often say hybrid information war, proxying the war in short. definition, in order to completely understand what it is about for an international conflict between two countries, who are trying to achieve their own goals with the help of hostilities taking place on the territory using the resources of a third country. under the guise of resolving an internal conflict. in this third country. there are more additional nuances. we dwell on them. this is when two countries are at war with the hands of a third party. for example, this is a classic. here it was after, and even simpler, so that it was still clear. that's when someone says that in order to establish democracy in this country, he sends troops there or supports terrorist attacks. it's opposite here it's a hybrid, but a proxy. here, look how we in africa, for example, actually fought with the americans. yes, but by the hands of angola of south africa there, even

south africa was under sanctions, and they were substituted weapons from south africa, yes, in order to prevent the current proteid regime from fighting. why then in the case of a proxy war - this is a classic openly talking about it back in the west, that is. u america is at war with russia ukraine is not the hands of ukraine and ukraine is a classic war when the ussr? sorry because the collective smell is at war here. not only the us so i wouldn't say it's a pure proxy war. here, in general, the whole west is the whole team. and a proxy and a hybrid and information cap. and we go further, and then it lies in the fact that whatever you call it, but there are elements that are impossible, you know, when we look spellbound at what is happening in ukraine, we must not forget that 2020 was an element , proxifying wars, what a covid confrontation and how they pressed us for

that we had our way during the corret. it was a proxy manifestation and what you are now looking at in poland. and you already referred to the head of the state security committee of tertel, who said that detachments are being trained on the territory of ukraine that are going to go in until they capture, there is a separate district arrange the center. ah, provocation. two versions are also happening on the other side of poland, also happening in the baltics, so what is here, how do you see this situation. well actually. eh, here's the configuration, it's understandable. we we saw that the escalation began even earlier. the radicalization of these whites, but you need to understand the real forces. they don't represent it. it's an information-propaganda veil, this cabinet, some retired one. e, traitor, traitor to the motherland, e, lieutenant colonel and so on. this is a cover. i've been good, commander. well, what is the name of what? yes, but

the fact is, i was in lugansk. when back in the summer they were there in the lugansk direction, a group from this regiment of the kneelers was destroyed. there's some just them there completely torn apart someone even took prisoner, but they have not been since then. this is what we need to understand. he says, polyclinic. there are no colonels there, either in terms of numbers or in the order in which they are used. even they are not even used in large numbers, because guys from the russian group and from the donbass really work on them as soon as they see them. they will be destroyed by their small groups. as part of individual units, the apu use panama. femilnitsky created the center of khmelnitsky and in my opinion, the eighth point of the special forces of ukraine where these activities are being worked out for us . the main directorate of intelligence, which is headed by one of the most radical terrorist-minded representatives of the kiev regime, a young ambitious wolf such as kirill budanov. uh, these people are

absolutely crazy, uh, and they set a goal to carry out. here is a full-fledged terrorist sabotage war against belarus. but we must clearly understand this, and our leadership, they say, we know about it. and we must also clearly understand what he said about this, by the way, too the chairman of the kgb very much. it can be seen political that no one is already a fugitive. and this is not their decision does not mean that the power in the country can be changed peacefully , let's not talk about it. no one in the open before this was not before there were disputes, maybe peaceful, maybe not visible now, huh? on command, the kgb chairman also spoke about this. they are fully manageable, including the creation of a joint headquarters - this is a team of the united states of america, of course. the chairman of the kgb talked a lot about this, that it was necessary be sure to combine them. and this is the us team. despite the fact that he told how some of them, like those ladies, have their own ambitions, share money, they did not want not to

unite. but here's what we must clearly understand. the first is only the military way. they see terrorism as extremism and second. look at people openly talking about terrorism extremism, and the strange thing they are not only talking about, shut up do not talk about it actively, this rhetoric is supported by the fugitives who are needed in order to justify possible terrorist attacks on belarus are carried out by western intelligence services. the face of these terrorist threats will be fugitives, including some traitors who will carry them out, that they must know that they will be the first to destroy. so they should at least think a little about themselves. those who are open about this now say that this will be the legitimate goal of the belarusian special services in the event of such a development of events. they may be happy to think about themselves, someone will give now, they will destroy, in general there is some kind of evil oleg sergeevich in this, the irony is that these are people who are more

all they shout about the threat of mobilization they themselves have long been under arms, polish, ukrainian lithuanian well, such karma, i don’t know how it can be the worst thing that they are our belarusians there, even if there are 20 more people here. pushed there to fight. this is the fate of the case itself, it is. here, they form some kind of banners there, remember in february there was such a wave, there are also some of our all sorts of elves, as they call it now in russia, they also ran, supposedly. we will have mobilization here now, they will make friends, what do you think it will be voluntary. with russian fugitives will be the same, they need banners. they need the vlasovites, they need bulak bulakhovich. they need those who understandably the main role will be played by western intelligence services. they perfectly represent the combat readiness of these fugitives in practice, but they need the banner, they need a propaganda effect to put pressure on our country and to put pressure on belarus on russia, look what they are already openly declaring. first, terrorism is not just sabotage extremism. they are on

foreign bayonets. they want to get at least some power. this is generally already beyond the limit. here, take away her foreign partisans, yes. well , does anyone really believe that two fugitive precincts and one operative are hacking into state security systems. this is done by the special services of our neighboring countries, which invest millions of dollars in this, and two district police officers are sitting in a warsaw hotel for 100 euros. you didn’t see you say that sergeevich did it. let’s say, let’s directly test the word of the chairman. he named only one of the gbs. well, apart from the russian post-soviet, uh, special services that are not working against us now, this is a massage. here all other cia mi6. everything that is in europe is now working against us. and here he believes, a fugitive district police officer opened the system of the ministry of internal affairs, he was in a file cabinet in the zavodskoy district. i couldn't sort out alcoholics correctly , this topic appeared partially mobilization in russia. here in belarus there will also

be no one even knows the system of mobilization of the belarusian armed forces. we don't have such a system. do not know if there are reserve service troops in reserve. ah, we continue to discuss global topics of national security. now, if earlier it sounded, as you know , some point from the doctrine there, from some concept, here is something that is written somewhere in a book, and now it is alive around us and we feel it on our fingertips , so national security, not only now promoted by the term information war. this is not only, of course, military threats. well, this, of course, is also economic security. and by the way, in our concept of national security, economic security is written down, the state of the economy in which the protection of the national interests of the republic of belarus from internal and external threats is guaranteed. so we saw last week the president held a big meeting with the economic bloc. uh, say

that ask you if you've seen this, they won't do it, because they must have seen and definitely heard. it was tough the president, the guards, that laid bare the main questions, which is exactly how they sound. in a society of folk a. and why ? because the question, for example, the rise in prices is a favorite topic. for any type of coulter for carrying out, as it is now customary to say, an informational psychological special operation for enemy propaganda in order to rock society like this, and powerful tasks were voiced to stop the rise in prices hmm to prevent a shortage it's no coincidence that the president. uh, it brings together practically in one meeting at one time and the composition coincides with the military threat to economic security. economic security. she's insecure without there can be no other development of the economic security of the state in any other sphere of security, there is mobilization, then the economic bloc, just

this is finance, but we must also understand that with all these drastic decisions. mm, the questions are not for sellers, not for trade, which provides. with that, well, what do we need a question to those who organize this trade to the organizers who receive huge profits, which the sellers themselves obviously do not go into the economy. they are the same consumers as we are. they just come to the store and understand that prices have risen, so to date. if we miss this moment, when people and, well, the heads of retail chains, so to speak, those who receive money, as intermediaries who took advantage of the situation when we have a lot of other problems and take advantage of the situation raised prices and thus forced consumers wince and not understand what is happening, of course, take very often no prices. as such, not

the goal itself. was this meeting. global president. i would like to indicate that the times others remember how he prorynok said that there was no no and will not be, that if someone needs it, then, as a strong man, he will do whatever he wants in this. he appealed to the government to those who are involved in, say , regulating this area, that now is the time to make decisions that come down from the situation, so the issue of prices is not the first one that the president did not have time to hold a meeting, went fakes. by the way, from those who used to say that the fact that prices are rising is bad, as soon as the president held a meeting they kill the market economy, business is destroyed, not, but we are moving almost to war communism, but this is a lie. the truth is that you bought goods for a ruble abroad , delivered it to belarus, which means it cost 2 rubles. at work, one and a half rubles, not 10 rubles. after all, let's tell the truth in recent months that you have been observed coming to someone to buy, something to shop happiness does not matter that you hear a mysterious face. well, you

see what is happening around the sanction, so the price is such, and at the same time he wants to earn 10, this is what we are talking about. the president talks about fairness no one destroys the market. nobody destroys business. we are talking about a decent game of decent rules and about the law, the second moment, perhaps before the sanctions. yes , the supply chains for some goods have changed, prices have risen, but perhaps for everything. excuse me and some goods. i look at how it was produced here, nothing has changed. do not catch your packages. no, pack it into another idea from life. here i will tell myself. here i have then a problem the big size of a leg or foot. i always buy shoes. well, i went for a long time i did not look at the internet one store, how the price of me, but imported okay, but russian and belarusian. there are very popular belarusian manufacturers. why did they raise the prices in this online store and they doubled there, well, there by 60%, what kind of supply chains have changed here

they say that they are buying here somewhere on the territory of the union state. indeed, this is a speculative effect, however, it should be noted that with us now it is not just some kind of praise for them. it 's real. so we know these people very we have a good economic bloc and we have, uh, and uh, deputy head of administration, who are supervised by both the assistant to the president and the ministers of economy. these are really learned people who lay out the situation. they do not just explain, but manage the processes, and we have achieved certain results. the results, as the minister of economy said, yes, the threats that began with, uh, winter, spring, they had to be stopped in the summer. we have reached a certain plateau. now we are entering a small, but nevertheless, growth in this situation, when the enemy expected to bring down our economy that did not happen. a but the president drew attention to pricing and now we will connect with the military group. why, among other things, did we need russian troops here, that the

enemy wants us to get into the arms race, put our entire economy under the e, armed for military needs, to cause social dissatisfaction with our coalition interaction, as the military doctrine is written in its new edition of the end of the xxi first year with the russian federation allows both russia and us to save money. we also had a decision was made to establish a southern operational command. not so, well, actually grouping to replace it. what is command? right now, any north pod in the west is two mechanized brigades. we need the rocket artillery brigade, we need the engineer regiment. well, approximately in this composition, this is additional expenses, creating a united group grouping. we save money so in everything from the pricing of the purchase of raw materials to the sale of products entering new markets, these are the numbers. let's voice them. we have increased our volume by

russian market. we'll be peaking soon. our peak figures were in the late nineties 11% our share now we have reached eight. we have increased our presence in the chinese market and these tasks are facing our manufacturers. and by the way, joining the shanghai organization. cooperate cooperation. why caused such a hysteria among the fugitives? to be honest, i did not expect all scos in our state militaries. here are the positive consequences, there was less attention than the enemy, well, they covered themselves and so on they got scared, because there was no international isolation we go out. to the largest markets see what is the market of india what is the market of china what is the market of iran the market of pakistan a. they are ready to cooperate with us with the dollar. they expected that dollars and euros would be russia and the belarusian ruble would collapse. what happened? and by the way, about the price it depends on the price. here we go again, it means the euro has fallen, the dollar has fallen, why prices do not fall on some goods, we take spare parts a simple topic that they know, so some

are on oil filters that a long time ago entrepreneurs built logistics through turkey. the united arab emirates wanted to earn 10 times. more. i remember in march. and when you ask. why does he say, you know the risks of their own i want to insure the risks i transfer i want to earn five six ten times more than before. there is not much time left for the global topic, but at least important ones, but it lives on with a stroke, let's see what else will happen, including from europe, so here's the most interesting thing - this is a week from the global one. this is what the sixteenth of october. china will host 20th congress of the communist party very serious expectations political scientists predict the third term of the seatpin earlier let me remind you that there was no such restriction on the third term was removed in the eighteenth year. many westerners say that beijing's foreign policy pressure is growing. i will now quote one of the main fears. here is the largest us affairs news site thinks so i quote means, but think china is now aggressive. wait

until it's gone. twentieth party congress. the west should expect sid to strive to conquer taiwan as importantly as that washington should expect that the intensity of militancy after the convention will be higher than before. and that his ambitions will be directed against the us and its allies, the biden administration is probably not ready for this. that's so what to expect to be afraid of back. they are now afraid of everything, especially a strong china and a rising china, because a strong china. and this is a united asia. these are colossal mmm resources that will obviously not be directed to cooperation with the west. they will be directed to development cooperation cooperation with those state, which are now trying to drive into isolation, including the russian federation, the republic of belarus and those countries that, in which the united states has long stubbornly tried to create a democracy, but nothing came of it, that is, they do not need a strong china. we need we need. i’ll add this here.

why did the anglo-saxons create an aux, yes, the new military-political union is the usa canada great britain australia, this is just a counterweight to china, mainly in order to, let ’s say, oppose influence and military- including military-political economic china in this entire e, let's say the indochinese zone to this day. in general, we can assume only one thing, that in this situation. they will not change, the leaders of the chinese will now formulate. uh, remember when the antipilus landed in taiwan everything was slippery. that's where the reaction is, why didn't they shoot down and well, people who understand say that well, not in the chinese tradition, yes, especially before the twentieth congress, wait for the 20th congress, and then it will be the answer to this autumn's political events. if extracted from war, these are the us elections and the 20th party congress. eh, here it is necessary to say directly that, of course,

there is a certain political struggle in the chinese leadership. name it discussions somehow. otherwise, it is hidden, but this is a chinese tradition. she has always been there, but what the americans have done now for the first time in many years, they tried artificially, putting pressure on china, to intervene in this struggle. and here, for example, visiting entilos. they tried to show what they see, but the leader is allegedly weak in china, that is, with these provocations to destabilize the situation in e. in china itself, provoke some kind of public discontent. ah, and perhaps even a split in the chinese leadership. there have never been so many publications of some kind of fiction somewhere justified by various contradictions that now exist in beijing, probably, in the west there has never been, as they are now for this congress. uh, the attention is riveted, unbelievable but really gray hair. for a long time they wondered what tactics he would choose; he chose the right tactics of no escalation. as it is written from the side of china no very much calmly measured, he brings the situation to the

twentieth congress. he needs to secure his political positions within the chinese leadership. but after that we will see a really definite line already, based on the support of the communist party. i would like to add that in general, uh, china has never done any escalation in the world , unlike those who accuse it of this, just the anglo-saxons, they they constantly tried to excavate around china, both at sea and on land, and and the leader, which means that china made some kind of decision on taiwan to exacerbate this situation somewhere. this is the first second e, most importantly, we must look from the point of view of belarus, it is beneficial for us that china be stable and strong, this is in our interests. i am convinced that after this congress it will become even more stable and even stronger, but i do not expect militant rhetoric from china after this congress is held, china will pursue the same policy and

tactics in defense of its national interests, but in chinese it is means calmly thoughtfully and using a proverb. most a terrible weapon is not an aian rocket, so they will quietly move the best war, the one that was not all this or not on the river bank conversation around the main such thesis on security. i suggest a small one. listen to the meetings with alexander lukashenko's security bloc right now, we will adequately respond to any opponent. we have been preparing for this for decades. if necessary, we will answer. god forbid of course according to legend, if you are our intelligence and the military and civilian committee of state security, something will not be missed and will not call, so we must

know everything that happens near our borders, without escalating the situation. i want you to understand. if you want peace, you must always prepare for war all your life, and everything is good. it will be good. therefore, in order to prevent any collisions and manifestations. we military people must have plans in advance to counter all kinds of scoundrels who are trying to drag us into a fight. we are not they should be allowed to drag us into the war. this is our main task. there should be no war on the territory of belarus, everything is clearly this task for the military, but for all of us, for the belarusians. here are the tasks. this is what is required of us. here is the current situation oleg sergeevich

you know, i know very well now the mood of people, because people are worried when i drive. this is fine. people are tense. they see what is happening around the country. here. i want to address them and listened attentively to the meeting with the president. he's got two thoughts that need, i think, to convey to each person. first, don't panic. do not be afraid. here, in order for everything to be calm in our country, there are two aspects for me. the first unity of the country is truly unity. let's now discard all these disputes, we are belarusians. we have a president. let's unite and be everyone . this is the second aspect to do your own thing at your workplace and not panic. if we are united. i have always been convinced of my country. we can only destroy ourselves no one it will not be destroyed, nor by the military through sanctions. everyone has already seen this, probably, and they know it, therefore, they have a bet that someday they will try to destroy it from the inside, so, if we are united, we will go about

our every business, and the military knows their business and the army. we will support now. i hope these conversations are over. remember to cut the army to remove the kgb mvd cut twice. well, what did we have now, if we had reduced it, and remember, this is all a small professional army of a couple of thousand and we don’t need anything more. and that what we are now we spoke in a hurry. uh, mobilization would be carried out. no, we have been doing this for 30 years, so our special services are strong, so put it aside. this is the stupidity of being united and doing this and not panicking. our guys want to sow panic, everyone opens this destructive telegram channel. panic. mobilization tomorrow. tomorrow is war. no need to panic, the intelligence services have done their job. thank you, you know, i still remember. e! 2010, when we worked out the last version of the concept of national security. we will say so after all. hmm, they took it on occasion. some circles wrote that we have military threats. no. there is only a source of military threat. here is today. here the head of state said that it was time to move away from

these weak-willed, let's say. so there is a shortage of definitions. there is a military threat. and today. i would say that it is necessary to more clearly spell out the concept of national security in the new edition, so that the emphasis on security sounds tougher and recommendations for minimizing the neutralization of these threats sound concrete indicating the specific states that originate. and why not. why should we leave? he also told the president that there is no need to leave something, write directly, as you understand. it seems to me that consolidation is our main thing, we need to unite. and most importantly, the main thing is really not to panic and just work, everyone in their place, work and ensure a normal life inside the country, and we have a border, as we understand it, with locks, and we must be sure. what uh? if god forbid, the president says something happens, we will give a worthy answer, but we must work and preserve our state

the way we want to see and develop it. thank you for giving the president an example of how to act in this situation - it is a cold mind to maintain not complacency, but calmness. uh, clear balanced decisions are required to act as a team. this is very important what strong belarusians have always been. we call it in different ways there it is loka, but this important point is trust and solidarity with our armed forces, if the knowledge that we belarusians and our task is to protect this corner of the earth, which has always already established itself as a corner of the world of stability, and this is in our power. and, of course , to believe in our allies of the russian federation, and i think that this is the guarantee that we will pass with dignity. the path to an extremely difficult environment for the whole world. thank you very much for participating in our program for today.

we loved running barefoot here.