according to deputy minister of economy dmitry yaroshevich, the share in the russian market increased by a third to russia from 5.5 to almost eight percent, the maximum was around 11, and therefore we have room to grow, especially now that the markets have been liberated by many large companies, many enterprises have also succeeded to solve logistics issues, thereby they increase external sales to friendly countries. hmm alone exported food worth 5 billion us dollars, that is, not only could we, uh, solve the issue our food security. we also actively export food to other countries. well, i think that this is very important here, given the current situation in the world in general and food issues. we e only in one august, well data we have for the eighth month statistical exported goods worth 3-4 billion us dollars in august. only this more than in august last year, experts in russia at the beginning of the year amounted to 14 billion dollars, and trade turnover. weighed 27 billion

parliamentarians of trade unions of belarus continue price monitoring throughout the country began to actively raid stores in different regions after the president signed a directive on the inadmissibility of price increases in the spotlight, not only large cities, but also trade in the population today, but in the schedule of visits, vitebsk region, the capital and again, minsk region, and on the eve of the location for verification became. ratomka here is dominated by convenience stores, despite the small area, the assortment is quite wide and, most importantly, prices do not change on october 6th. this applies to both state and network and private outlets. the republican road train of memory continues its journey through iconic places. the participants of the patriotic project visited the historical complex in the agro-town, krasny bereg. here , during the war years, the germans organized a children's donor concentration camp in memory of the buzniks, flowers and a minute of silence, another important place in the settlement, the poklevsky goat estate,

which was built in the 19th century, a road train of memory united 30 young families from different parts of the country together. they discover our historical and cultural heritage in a new way. heritage is planned that the participants of the road train will visit all regions of belarus this year the project is timed. to the week of parental love. the finale of the action this friday, a french delicacy with provencal and burgundy sauce is preparing in the snail park in rodashkovichi. this is a new tourist attraction on the map of the minsk region. edible mollusks are bred right there on a special farm. in the pavilion, a microclimate that is comfortable for live shells is created with high humidity from the tropi. the air temperature on the farm is 14 species of snails, these are african and mediterranean molluscs are not bred on an industrial scale, as long as they provide exclusively guests of the park, by the way, french exotica with a belarusian flavor. many people liked it. i travel a lot, in principle, i have been to about 50 countries

all over the world and now one of the most popular destinations is belarus and i came here in order to find new interesting places, so that later in the russian audience, as i am engaged in producing, tell about what -something new directions new snail farm experiences. i think so. wow, i have never seen this in moscow, i have not seen this, in general, wherever i am in the world. i have not come across the fact that people are specialized in cultivating snails. the new tourist site is popular, up to 100 guests come here from belarusian and foreign tourists over the weekend. and this is not counting bus tours. therefore, we plan to expand. on the territory for family recreation

hello hello everyone. who is with us now? extremely eventful and disturbing days, strikes on the crimean bridge, missile arrivals on critical infrastructure of ukraine, the statement of the polish leadership about the views of american nuclear weapons zelensky on preventive strikes. yes, and in general, the nuclear topic has ceased to be a taboo and has firmly established itself in the political information flow in one frantsevich, as the world has come to the point that we are already playing the nuclear topic. so the starter is just a frank confrontation, then, especially the confrontation of nuclear superpowers or great powers, whatever you want to call it. well, listen, it's no secret. and we talked about it a lot they say, and what is going on is a struggle not between russia and ukraine, not even between russia and nato, but between russia and the united states, these are the two largest

nuclear powers, if the stakes are constantly rising, it is already a question of how to divide russia, how to weaken it? how to defeat, the question of nuclear weapons naturally arises, this is almost the most that happened exactly 60 exactly these october days 60 years ago during the caribbean crisis, but for now this is rhetoric, here we are, when we analyze we must see indicators, indicators of what is really about this is being spoken or not. look, everyone is talking about nuclear weapons, but russian officials don't talk about it at all. this time. whether believe in it in the west. look, they are all russia here. now, after the raisin, he will use nuclear weapons, while the american embassies, uh, the western embassy, ​​including the american advisory mission, and so on, continued to be in kiev as soon as russia launched a conventional weapon, that is, missiles, against ukrainian infrastructure. immediately announced the conclusion, according to

essence. what does this rhetoric mean, increases the escalation, deliberately trying to provoke the military of the russian federation into these new steps, for what, in order to see international pressure on our state, including the union state, and in order to continue throwing the ukrainian people into this bloody meat grinder key events, of course, of the last days, which we are all discussing. this is a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge , and he, too, threw down masks with e. diplomats and leaders have said how they reacted to what was essentially a terrorist attack followed by attacks on critical infrastructure in kiev and other ukrainian cities. and now the experts immediately started talking about the fact that everything is a new level, firstly, do you agree that this is some kind of new level of confrontation. and if so, what would be the essence of that level,

which went aside what you said to the press, that's pretty true. and in principle, this indicates the level of political thinking today. especially western. how next. that is, more tension, more misunderstandings, and more and more to leave. let's just say that some reasonable policy today is the policy of western states. she does not suffer from any prudence at all. they no longer suffer from this prudence. it's just some mental deviations going deviations. not only that, i can say today that such things are already allowed. uh, yesterday, for example, it passed that it was necessary for him to remove two members of russia, china, respectively, brother, all of the security council. he, well, yes, they ruined the entire system of international security. now russia still needs to crawl by secret ballot, they must see who

then to punish for themselves the speech of the kupriyans of the representative of gazprom, the french representative, who chaired the meeting of the security council, simply did not allow this to be done. i mean, we just see. uh, comes with dressy ones . these are the political things that fully influence the military-political situation today. it escalates and again the use of tactical nuclear weapons. it a rather interesting topic, if only because the united states does not have tactical nuclear weapons in europe. there is the most low-power bomb, which is in the us nuclear warehouses of the us army, only this is one megane. this is not tactical nuclear weapons, but tactical nuclear weapons - this is one and a half to 10 kilos and a half 10 kg, which the russian armed forces have this weaponry and that's all, and therefore bend this topic about the use of non-use, what you scan and they even try to remember how

no, russia will attack. well attacked created the principle of the principles of special operation, which allowed it to solve its security issues within the framework of some military operations. i would like to add that the behavior of western countries. it is not just the unconscious conscious that we see it is the conscious escalation of the conflict in europe. the united states of america is extremely interested that this conflict not only last. not only longer, uh, the stakes in this conflict have been raised, but so that as many european countries as possible, as many and as deep as possible, are mired in this conflict, moreover, in the european union already voices of understanding of this are heard literally this week, a number of officials with europe said that how is it that against the backdrop of the energy crisis that is now happening in europe, the united states of america is selling us four times more expensive gas that we used to buy. this is the first second promotion. these rates, of course, must be

stated that they are special. the military operation that russia is conducting has moved to a different phase, which means that it is completely different, and this can be seen not only from the personnel changes that e happened in the ministry of defense of the russian federation but also in russian tactics e, the stakes were raised and mobilization was carried out and secrets. there is no more than that, uh hmm, there is also an informational effect here. remember just a week ago, and especially after the blowing up of the crimean bridge, how western and ukrainian propaganda said that russia was losing everything. look, we are already blowing up with impunity , the crimean bridge. on monday, the whole world saw that it was far, far away, to put it mildly, far from reality, more in addition, european tabloids outraged very ukrainian propagandists by the fact that, firstly , they wrote the truth that the attacks on the ukrainian infrastructure were responses to the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge and the minister of foreign

affairs. ukraine urgently tried. edit all the world's media what do you write? this is not so, but the world media, by the way, did not succumb. they kept writing it. this very effect is not kind of like rejoiced. but what did they create? sai- here they made a mistake, they all began to rejoice in writing on twitter there, how happy they are with the population and they saw it, they created the first feeling that it was the terrorist attacks that ukraine was behind and that russia had the right to a legitimate strike. it was the general mood. eventually. now let's go to bed. here are the kulebs - this is generally a disgrace, you know the minister of foreign affairs. ukraine sits in the hotel says, because someone blew up the bridge. he says, you are not in kiev at all, i don’t know what is happening, he says, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine yes, in general it was, then they began to rewind. this is all they say. here nis was so happy at the beginning of the brand being photographed and saying, no, it's not us, because they looked at the mood of western

citizens. they say so. you are right that you fucked up the infrastructure. and what do you want ? you hit the bridge and you will be answered and, by the way, very important processes are taking place in the west, influential people. people like elon musk and not only he alone began to say things, understanding the position of russia, understanding this argument. it is no longer marginal. there are some retired politicians analysts of the second fifth category - this is a person who enjoys more authority than many european leaders put together. ukraine's answer to this was already very indicative, because the ukrainians expected much more support. she didn't receive it. even biden, when they talked and said that if you then go complain that he says to select weapons next time, but at the same time, let's get back to this and listen. and what kind of statements? the fact is that the white house gives extremely contradictory

statements, a feeling that one head says one thing i'll try something completely different. on the one hand, they heard the united states is not looking for a conflict with russia and will not send troops to ukraine biden. he made it clear that this is very clear. the united states also does not want the conflict in ukraine to acquire a nuclear dimension. we heard no reasons for this, and immediately after that, the united states does not exclude anything in the issue of supplying tactical missiles to kiev. well , bolton, too, he got into such an informational mainstream. this is a former adviser to the president of the united states on national security, and putin made a statement as the president of russia is a key person for the russian army. this makes it one of the targets on our list. well , probably the icing on the cake. in this case, this is a statement made by nato before the speech. from a meeting with the defense ministers of the alliance, stoltenberg generally takes off his masks and calls everything by its proper name . russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine will become

a defeat for nato. this cannot be allowed, the united states is a direct participant in the conflict. it's not a secret. and what the secretary general said. nato was clear a long time ago and not only the united states, but practically all western countries, and the entire nato alliance - more than fifty-two countries are now opponents of russia for the second moment, while yesterday there was a voice with france where the french minister of affairs said that we we cannot refuse contacts with russia, we must continue the dialogue , what is it to talk about? i support the french case that the western elites are also divided, the united states of america is raising now this aggressive rhetoric and raising the stakes in the war, one of the goals is just to force europe to continue to be united in order to act in the interests of the united states, but interests in europe are, well, not quite different. they are completely different. in this case, we are all talking about the elites about such global snakes, and the people yes, people who have long

understood and disassembled, judging by the comments in uh, in social networks. they have been for a long time. well, they took their side, how do they treat refugees from ukraine, yes, that is, against them, how much they are tuned, that is, people cannot understand why military operations are of concern there russia ukraine does not care about the lives of citizens of european states and states and the united states of america citizens are left behind, that is, all the means that that's when there was an emergency in florida yes and then they talked about the fact that on the du flora there was no money much less than the amount it was for ukraine , please, yes, yes, the threats to us are growing. now we have to focus even more on that. and what, why do we differ. here you are already said what happened. some strange unhealthy intoxication in ukrainian society, warmed up, of course, but also by propaganda and, uh, by the kiev regime. what did they

start talking about? so it turned out to be the crimean bridge, or should we not make the crimean bridge 2-3, and so on, separated by a comma, the president of belarus has been collecting for a week. ah, the power block. eh, here each moment parses separately. we see that he keeps his finger on the pulse, and specifically about these intoxicated people, he also gave a completely clear signal. let's listen to a fragment, then let's discuss it through informal channels. as far as it was, perhaps we were warned by him to strike at belarus from the territory of ukraine. well, as it was stated, we will make it so that it will be the crimean bridge, 2 my answer was just bring it to the president of ukraine and others. the insane, if they are still there, that the crimean bridge will seem like flowers to them. there is only they will touch with their dirty hands, at least one meter of our territory. i would like to comment on this

by the fact that these are today about the southern borders of belarus formed and clearly 15,000 work for the grouping of the armed forces of ukraine, only the armed forces of ukraine without cakes, without uh, the national guard and other armed forces and the same uh, the same border guards when although they say that in general, there are belarusian border guards, that the border guards stop, and the parties are already fled, and there go drunk to work out, firstly, all bridges are destroyed. on the main directions of access to belarus, moreover, almost the entire territory is mined, leaving two entrances and exits. and it's getting bigger militarization, again from the west why is it that today the original grouping of troops of the forces of e, numbering about 5,000 people, is already unfolding and unfolding, these are the belarusian and russian

armed forces that will stand on the western borders, because on the other side two-thirds of the ground forces . poland is already concentrated at the borders. belarus 2/3. this does not mean that 25,000 us troops are still stationed in poland yesterday, but zelensky's proposal before the heads of the g7 to invite international observers, as he said at the ukrainian belarusian border. here's some kind of design. well, you know, in my opinion, medvedev has already spoken about zelensky there. i don’t want to repeat the words, but this or this is already slipping some options on him , we are slipping you understand, this is one question in that he himself no longer has a clear mind for a solution. here, uh, the first one. i want to comment on two points president. why is the biggest risk right, about which we are talking now about the possibility of some kind of strikes against belarus, is the complete independence of the neighboring countries that us neither ukraine nor poland is surrounded by lithuania, the same,

unfortunately, to ask who, what these countries have, if it is necessary for the americans to throw them into the conflict zone, no one will now about zelensky's first application zelensky is absolutely not an independent figure of a guarantee of peace from zelensky is worth nothing, like any of his words that he said recently. did he say it himself, i doubt what the risk is? what troops does he invite in order to observe nato on the border of belarus? so for us, this for us, this is yet another concentration of nato troops on legal grounds on the territory of ukraine close to our border, and we will believe. and how many times we have been deceived over these 30 years, or and now we will take it and say. we believe, we believe that you, if you want, good goals are generally immune here, in general, at the word of a foreign foreign observer, we immediately understand how they will observe, which our citizens and the countries that surround us should clearly understand everything that we are doing now . here are the president's commands to strengthen the border along strengthening the grouping for the deployment

of the russian belarusian grouping, it’s just aimed at the world aimed at neutralizing the threats from them this lack of independence of these countries why so that those who actually make the decision see what consequences their rash actions can lead to, because the rules for preventing war are one, the stronger you are, the less likely it is that there will be a war with what you weaken to destroy? this, by the way, is the right president, holding one meeting after another in public, directing the generals, uh to a briefing with the public in labor collectives in general. so unusual for what it is done? this is the line of war prevention. these are the actions of creating an allied group. we show the enemy. first. we all know your plans. well, you understand that if the military people see that their plans are revealed, preventive actions are being taken, but why should they go on the rampage? they will suffer losses and not achieve, we see these plans as a result. we, uh,

convey clear, open information to society. right now, when somewhere russian society criticized the department of defense. why because the information was coming, uh, not in the way it should have been, and certain problems naturally arose in connection with this. here, it's just out in the open. uh, the top military leadership comes, uh, to collectives and talks to people. but i would be here. well, it’s not that e didn’t underestimate independence. uh, some of his line, which is carried out by poland, the same baltic states and ukraine . they are cunning. i don't know for sure, for example. application, which zelensky solemnly he signed in nato, he came up with it himself or was told to him, there are some moments there. he was also refused. and this was refused in general, and this could be predicted with regard to the invitation, the so-called observation mission or the international mission, as he said. well, this is one of the reasons for the advancement of the same polish troops. and here

one can argue about the concentration where they stand here, of course, because their main four formations are three mechanized divisions, it is the so-called armored 11 tank. they are constantly are moving. that is, the border of the southern state is getting closer. there is no border at all, so here they are, as the president said , he withdraws 100 km, for which, in fact, several battalions of regular polish troops are already in ukraine in one form or another, they simply don’t use a battalion. there we already see that in the course of hostilities on the fronts. soldiers show up. well, there they are on vacation, there the crew is completely british. therefore, they are moving like this, and now conditions are being created for input. with what is it dangerous in the share of the hot border of the hot border, and the ukrainian troops will be nato, that is, any clash. this is what our military was talking about, when these same taroboronists or border guards come out

and aim in our direction, it can lead to some kind of armed provocation, that is, they deliberately want to expose their european allies to the americans under attack, but here there is one nuance that the americans for them in this case will not intercede. now, if yes, now, if, for example, there was even a provocation on the belarusian lithuanian border. this is the fifth article of the nato charter without question. and if on ukrainian territory, then it’s you poles and ukrainians who understand. we ourselves will supply you with tactical ones. and so all these, and so these kms yes , for 300 km, which are a magnifying glass. and so on, but themselves wow it's france still agree. but i don’t believe at all that the united states will stand up for anyone in europe at all. they both sat overseas and will continue to supply weapons and spray them never this article five. we need to create this joint grouping, because many of us see how they interpret. although the president look, and on the eve of the generals lieutenant, minister of defense of belarus viktor and ignache horseradish again. e,

clearly stated that the tasks of the regional grouping of troops are purely defensive, and all the activities carried out at the moment are aimed at adequately responding to actions near our borders. well, it seems to me that as a person not a military man, yes, that is, from another point of view, this is a normal situation in order to, first of all, as already mentioned show that we are ready for any development of the situation, and on the other hand, well, do not allow the panic among the population of the republic of belarus to visit this panic. remember yesterday, yes, on all channels, so that maybe there is a viral mailing from viber that the strikes were inflicted on minsk, no one panicked, absolutely no one talked to. all smiled says, well, of course. that is, we should not panic, but the polish side has already sounded good several times. hmm, the president, in principle , has already touched on this topic, including i communicate with the military, these are the words of duda, which i said at first i lamented, what can i say? we do not have nuclear weapons, nothing

foreshadows that we will soon have our own and why not negotiate with the americans so that their nuclear weapons end up on our territory. here's how you approach your question. on this remark, the poles again want someone else's hands. get yourself something again to snatch at the expense of someone who, without substituting himself, so that they will be given everything. they will again put forward the poles play their game they want to grow they want germany to mean egesmania confrontation nuclear weapons - this is an attribute of great activity, pushes germany aside and now the supply of nuclear weapons will make them the largest military power. here, as soon as we declared this lie to be debunked. this means that as soon as we announced that we had deployed a grouping, as soon as we said that we were deploying our grouping , words of occupation were immediately heard. the first thing people should know is grouping

is provided. not now. it is provided the union treaty, which was signed a long time ago and the second point they say about the occupation there are those where nato stands dozens of times more than ours. that is, it is not a payback for them. for decades, nato troops have been building bases for them, new ones are asking for more and more new bases in the foliage of their soldiers there are no three soldiers. everything else they expect. it's just an army. here are three four. so, how figuratively i say , and on the elevator, together with the general of the whole army , they go down, they all count on nato, and when we act as allies, us to be occupied, so who is occupied? you are occupied. you cannot make any decision on your own. you cannot defend your country. you can't piss and not enter, when the americans tell you, and you say, this is more. do you agree with these experts, then he says that at the moment poland is already so concentrated in western armaments that it has the ability to consider offensive concepts, even

regardless of where it still takes time, they do plan to expand their armed forces to 300,000 approximately three times. well, on average, the military budget of poland and the annual increase. they are purchasing not only the stipulated 6 billion dollars. can you imagine for the purchase of abrams tanks, they will even have k2. there are such south korean tanks to buy, poland is planning. it has been stated. here, it's all about haimaz. they say you know. how many hymer to buy 500 pieces of launchers. well, they haven't been around for a long time . basically, so many. and they still need to be produced. it's a few years they'll be do, but really. what is the goal for poland, we talked there in ukraine, so that poland alone, without the help of nato allies, can conduct military operations with limited goals, but on a regional scale. eh, doesn't it automatically do that. uh, poland, uh country, solid red line for eg

russian. let's do it in general this word is a red line, we will forget e well automatically turns into a threat, which is a threat, respectively, which forms with its own hands, see how can be invented. and out of the blue to inflate the escalation. so alexander ivanovich knows. in our doctrine, in our plans, there is such a term as the suwalki corridor. no, yes, and it does not make sense. well, in order to understand our northwest in kaliningrad, there is a space between them that separates up to 60 km, sometimes there is a little more from the baltic states and suddenly out of the blue. we do not conduct any exercises in this country, the poles with the baltics, with the support of the americans, just blow it like an incredible threat. they say that there is a need host an american military base. this is still when the trump began, let's call it fort of the ramp that base, duda there the knee, bowed or bowed before the trump, begging this base to place, no threat at all. there is

no concentration of troops. in this direction 10 years ago. is it really the first time every year when russia belarus conducts exercises? every year we discussed in this studio fakes in poland in lithuania that tomorrow we will attack lithuania tomorrow we will attack poland relations even with them sometimes did not have an anti-terrorist threat. sometimes they worked out the fairies right away, like this week tanks were tanks, but remember this fake bro again that allegedly belarus supplies you through the zosha to russia. tanks yes, russia has enough of its tanks. you are already convinced. you wrote that the shells ended one day russia bombed the shells. no, the second day is bombed by shells. no third day to bomb. they say it's over now. and today, an american expert wrote the truth, he says, you know, it turns out that russia even if there are no produce for half a year, they can bomb every day, and they produce the same thing about fakes about us teaching correctly. he was gawling good and will be when the topic of the suvar corridor

appeared, when the baltics were accepted as a sign, and before that the topic of the harsh corridor was not here oh well, well, you first created the problem, and then let's solve it. they are all the time russian tanks will go. after 2 hours they are already connected. leningrad region, a joint grouping and, after all, we heard that the minister of defense said that in the near future to we will receive more iskanders and s-400s and the corresponding personnel on belarusian territory have already completed a full course of training ; this, well, is capable of sobering up those who, let's say now. so it will increase the military security and the allied state. naturally, including belarus, this is simply an increase in the security of military security today. yes, we kind of have polonaises, here, but the addition of iskander i s-400. by the way, e has been working since four hundred just as part of a training center where our servicemen were trained. he works in combat training mode, breaks

into chapters from zelensky yerma when the president said the program and dirty hands. he first tweeted there, and then immediately deleted it, because it was explained to him that belarus had something to answer. the fact is that this kiev regime is afraid of the polonaise, they have an interesting moment there. they hesitate, here they come out. there, some of these arrest officers and others, gifts there, yes, well , the belarusian army, weak, not combat-ready, and so on, went to the azerbaijanis. they asked about polonaises. they also have everything said strong missiles. they mean, now most of all they are afraid of polonaises. i even see in russia around our polonaises a whole legend is being created that this is some kind of super-weapon, they are really afraid of them, but they do it right to be afraid, because in addition to polonaises we have point launchers, we have tornadoes. we have hurricanes. that is, something that can strike, er, irreparable, both in personnel in manpower, that is, in the equipment of the group that they plan to concentrate. well, what is the state, and 300 km. well it is, that is

cameras with yes, there are different in different configurations, but here is a border grouping. we are guaranteed to destroy, no matter how they swagger. this is the second time. they don't set goals. the invasion is now a large group, because again they are there talking about their successes in september. but they understand that they cannot. well, even these 15,000 are not the group that can not fight back. together our group is an allied state, so they are betting on a hybrid invasion. these plans were revealed by our ministry of defense and the kgb. this rendering pressure on the belarusian society. here, in the style of rights, a quarter demolished you, or how bulak balakhovich acted to invade, arrange terror to seize some settlement and we’ll talk about this topic, but for starters, so that before we talk about it, we must lead the concept that in principle, already

on hearing, but our military. i think the audience took notice. recently , more and more often used. here is the term proxy war. we often say hybrid information war, proxy war short. definition, so that you already completely understand what is at stake. for an international conflict between two countries that are trying to achieve their own goals through hostilities taking place on the territory using the resources of a third country. under the guise of resolving an internal conflict. in this third country. there are more additional nuances. we will stop at them. this, when two countries are waging war with the hands of a third party, for example, is a classic. it was easier after the correction. and even easier to was still clear. that's when someone says that in order to establish democracy in this country, he sends troops there or supports terrorist attacks, so here it is a hybrid, but a proxy. here, look how we in africa, for example, actually fought with the americans. yes, but by the hands of angola of south africa there, even south africa was under sanctions, and they supplied weapons to them from under the floor

. yes, in order to e regime oproteids are not now fighting, why then happened in the case here is a proxy war - this is a classic about it in open, they say back in the west, that is, but america is at war with russia, ukraine is not the hands of ukraine and ukraine is a classic, when the ussr fought a proxy war? sorry, because the collective west is fighting here, not only the united states, so i would not say some kind of pure proxy war. here. in general, the whole west, the entire collective, has already led both proxies and hybrid information into all types of war. and we go further, and then it is that whatever you call it, but if the elements that are well impossible, you know when when we fascinated look at what is happening in ukraine, we must not forget that 2020 was an element, proxying wars, that covid confrontation and how we were pressured for having our own way while it was a proxy manifestation and what you will now

see in poland. and you already referred to the head of the state security committee of tertel, who said that detachments are being prepared on the territory of ukraine, which are going to go up to the point of capturing there. a separate regional center to arrange e-provocations of sabotage too what is happening on the part of poland is also happening in the baltics, what is happening here, how do you see this situation. well actually. eh, here's the configuration, it's understandable. we saw that the escalation and radicalization of these whites began even earlier, but you need to understand the real forces. they do not represent this informational and propaganda veil, this cabinet, some retired one. e, traitor, traitor to the motherland, e, lieutenant colonel and so on. this is a cover. i've been a good team. well, who are called by different names. yes, but the thing is, i've been in lugansk when back in the summer, a

grouping from this regiment of kalinovites was destroyed there in the lugansk direction. there, some of them were simply torn apart completely, someone was even taken prisoner, but they have not been there since. this is what we need to understand. he says, polklinovsky, there is no half-pogon. whatever regiments, neither in terms of numbers nor in the order of their use, even they are not even used in large numbers, because guys from the russian group from donbass really work for them as soon as they see them. they will be destroyed by their ma- in small groups, as part of individual units of the armed forces, panamas are used by feminists, a center has been created in khmelnytsky and in my opinion, the eighth regiment of the special forces of ukraine, where these measures are being worked out, works for us. the main directorate of intelligence, which is headed by one of the most radical terrorist-minded representatives of the kiev regime, a young ambitious wolf such as kirill budanov. uh, these people are absolutely crazy, uh, and they set a goal to

carry out. here is a full-fledged terrorist sabotage war against belarus we must have a clear idea and our leadership about this, they say, we see we know. and we must also clearly understand that , by the way, the chairman of the kgb also talked about this a lot. it can be seen political that no one is already a fugitive. and it’s not their decision that doesn’t mean that the government in the country can be changed peacefully, no one talks about it anymore. no one has ever had this openly before, there were disputes, maybe peacefully, maybe not peacefully now. and this, on command, the chairman of the kgb also spoke about this. they are fully manageable, including the creation of a united headquarters - this is the team of the united states of america, they took, of course, the chairman of the kgb talked a lot about this, that it was necessary to unite them. and this is the us team. despite the fact that he told how some of them, how those ladies there have their own ambitions to share money and they did not want to unite. but here's what we must clearly understand. the first is only the military way. they

see terrorism as extremism and second. look people are openly talking about extremism terrorism, and the strange ones they are not only talking about, shut up don't talk about it actively this rhetoric. let's say i'm translating fugitives needed in order to justify possible terrorist attacks on belarus, they are carried out by western intelligence services. and with the face of these terrorist threats , fugitives will pour in, including some traitors who will carry them out, that they must know that they will be the first to destroy. so they should at least think a little about themselves. those who are open about this now say that this will be the legitimate goal of the belarusian special services in the event of such a development of events. they may think too early anyone now. yes, in general, there is some kind of oleg sergeevich evil in this, the irony is that these are the people who scream the most about the threat of mobilization themselves have long been under arms, polish, ukrainian lithuanian well, such

karma, i don’t know how it is, maybe the worst got up, that they are our belarusians there, even if there are two people here, pushed there to fight. this is destiny. it's horrendous, it really is. here, they form some kind of horugs there, remember in february there was such a wave, there are also some of our all sorts of these elves, as they are now called in russia, also ran, allegedly. we will have mobilization here now, they will make friends, what do you think it will be voluntary. it will be the same with the russian fugitives, they need banners. they need the vlasovites, they need bulak bulakhovich. they need those who understandably the main role will be played by western intelligence services. they perfectly represent the combat readiness of these fugitives in practice, but they need the banner, they need a propaganda effect to put pressure on our country and to provide pressure on belarus, uh, on russia, look what they are already openly declaring. first, terrorism is not just sabotage extremism. they are on foreign bayonets. they want to get at least some power. this is generally a prefix.

here to introduce her foreign partisans yes. well , does anyone really believe that two fugitive precincts and one are hacking into state security systems. this is done by the special services of our neighboring countries, which invest millions of dollars in this, and two district police officers sit for 100 euros, the warsaw hotel. didn't see it was saying it did sergeevich let's say, let's directly test the word of the squatter. lube, he named only one of well, except for the russian post-soviet, er, special services that are not working against us now, this is a massage. here are all the rest of the cia mi6. everything that is in europe is now working against us. and we are sure here that the fugitive policeman hid the system of the ministry of internal affairs, he could not correctly sort out alcoholics in the zavodskoy district in a file cabinet , so it’s necessary that this topic of partial mobilization appeared in russia. here in belarus there will be no one does not even know the system of mobilization of the belarusian armed forces. we don't have such a system. do not

know if there are reserve service troops in reserve. ah, we continue to discuss the global topic of national security. now, if earlier it sounded, as you know, some kind of paragraph from uh, doctrine there from some kind of concept. here is something that is written somewhere in a book, and now it is alive around us and now we feel it on our fingertips. so here is national security, far away, not only the now hyped term informational war. this is not only, of course, military threats. well, this, of course, is also economic security. oh, by the way, in our concept of national security, this is how economic security is written, the state of the economy, in which the protection of the national interests of the republic of belarus from internal and external threats is guaranteed. so we saw last week the president held a big meeting with the economic bloc. uh, say that ask you if you've seen this one wo n't do it because you've probably seen it and

definitely heard. it was tough the president, the guards, that laid bare the main questions, which is exactly how they sound. in society according to the popular why? because the question, for example, rising prices is a favorite topic for any type of person to carry out, as they say now, an information-psychological special operation for enemy propaganda in order to rock society, and so, powerful tasks were voiced to stop growth prices hmm prevent shortages remove intermediaries clearly define who is responsible for fulfilling these tasks and so on, but it is no coincidence that yulia konstantinovna is the president. e, brings together practically in one meeting at one time and the composition coincides with the military threat to economic security. economic security. it is insecurity without the economic security of the state, no other development and other sphere of security can not be mobilized, then the economic bloc. just this is finance, but we must also understand that with all these

abrupt decisions, hmm, the questions are not for sellers, not for trade, which provides. with that, well that we need a question to those who organize this trade to the organizers who receive huge profits, which the sellers themselves do not obviously go into the economy. they are the same consumers, just like us , they also come to the store and understand that prices have risen, so today hmm, if you miss this moment, when people, uh, well, managers of retail chains, so let's say, yes, those who receive money, as intermediaries, who took advantage of the situation when we have a lot of other problems and will take advantage of the situation by raising prices and thus way made consumers flinch and do not understand what is happening, of course, take very often not the price. as such, not the goal. was this meeting. global president. i would like to point out that the times are different, remember how he was a pro-market said that

there was no no and there will not be, that if someone needs it, then, as a strong man, he will do whatever he wants in this one. i appealed to the government to those involved in, say , regulation of this area, that now is the time to make decisions that come from situation, so the issue of prices, he is not the first, not the last, the president did not have time to hold a meeting, they went fake. by the way, from those who used to say that the fact that prices are rising - it 's bad, as soon as the president held a meeting they kill the market economy, business is destroyed, not, but we are moving almost to war communism, but this is a lie. the truth is that you bought goods for a ruble abroad , delivered it to belarus, which means it cost 2 rubles. at work, one and a half rubles, not 10 rubles. after all, let's tell the truth in recent months, what has been observed you come to someone buy, something private shop no matter what you hear the face of the mysterious. well, you see what is happening around the sanction, so the price is such, and at the same time he wants to

earn 10, this is what we are talking about. the president speaks of justice, no one destroys the market. nobody destroys business. we are talking about a decent game of decent rules and about the law, the second moment, perhaps before the sanctions. yes , the supply chains for some goods have changed, prices have risen, but perhaps for everything. excuse me and some goods. i look at how it was produced here, nothing has changed. do not catch your packages. no, pack it in another, - he says - everything from life, i will tell you on myself. here i have then a problem the big size of a leg or foot. i always buy shoes. well , i went for a long time, i didn’t look at one store on the internet, how the price of me, but imported okay, but russian and belarusian. there are very popular belarusian manufacturers. why did they raise prices in this online store and they doubled there, well, there by 60%. what supply chains here have changed skin they claim to buy here somewhere on territory of the union state.

indeed, this is a speculative effect, however, it should be noted that with us now it is not just some kind of praise for them. it 's real. so we know these people are a very good economic bloc and we have, uh, deputy chief of staff, who are supervised by both the assistant to the president and the ministers of economy. these are really learned people who lay out the situation. they do not just explain, but manage the processes, and we have achieved certain results. results, as the minister of economy said, yes, here are the threats, which began with er, winter of spring, they had to be stopped in the summer. we have reached a certain plateau. now we are entering a small, but, nevertheless, growth in this situation, when the enemy expected to bring down our economy , this did not happen. a but the president drew attention to pricing. and now we will connect the connections with the military group. why, among other things, did we need russian troops here, that the enemy wants us to get into

the arms race, put under e, armed for military needs, our entire economy with this social discontent, our coalition interaction, as the military doctrine in its new edition of the end of the 21st year with the russian federation states, allows both russia and us to save money. in our country, it was decided to create the southern operational command, so yes, well, in fact, the grouping will replace it. what is command? right now, any north pod to the west is two mechanized brigades. we need the rocket artillery brigade, we need the engineer regiment. well , approximately in this composition it is additional expenses by creating a combined group grouping. we save money and so in everything from the pricing of the purchase of raw materials to the sale of products entering new markets. here are the numbers. let's voice them. we have increased our volume in the russian market. we'll be peaking soon. our peak figures were in the late nineties 11% our

share now we have reached eight. we have increased our presence in the chinese market and these tasks are facing our producers. and by the way, joining the shanghai cooperation organization, why caused such a hysteria among the fugitives? to be honest, i did not expect all scos in our state militaries . here are the positive consequences, there was less attention than the enemy, well, they themselves were frightened, because we are leaving no international isolation. but the biggest markets look what is the market of india what is the market of china what is the market of iran the market of pakistan a. they are ready to cooperate with us with the dollar. were they waiting for the euro to be russia and the belarusian ruble or collapse? what happened? and by the way, the prices are the prices for here again. we appeal, so the euro fell the dollar has fallen, why prices do not fall on some goods, we take spare parts a simple topic that they know, so some people on oil filters, who long ago fired the logistics of entrepreneurs through

turkey and the united arab emirates, wanted to earn 10 times. more. i remember in march. and when you ask. why does he say, you know the risks of their own i want to insure the risks i transfer i want to earn five six ten times more than before. there is not much time left for the global topic, but at least important ones that live at the expense of a stroke, let's go through, let's see what else will happen, including with europe, so here's the most interesting thing - this is a week from the global. this is what the sixteenth of october. the 20th congress of the communist party will be held in china very serious expectations political scientists predict the third term of the sidepin earlier let me remind you that this was not the limit for the third term was removed in the eighteenth year. many westerners say that beijing's foreign policy pressure is growing. i will now quote one of the main fears. here is the largest us news site dohill thinks so i quote means, but think china now aggressive. wait until it 's gone. twentieth party congress. the west should

expect sid to seek to conquer taiwan just as importantly, that washington should expect that the intensity of militancy after the convention will be higher than before and that its ambitions will be directed against the us of its allies, and the biden administration is probably not ready for this. so what to expect to be afraid of back, in the west, they are now afraid of everything, especially strong china and growing china because strong china and this is a united asia, this is colossal mmm resources that will be directed clearly not to cooperation with the west. they will be directed to development cooperation with those states that are now trying to drive into isolation, including the russian federation, the republic of belarus and those countries in which, uh, in which uh, the united states has long stubbornly tried to resist democracy, but nothing came of it. that is strong. they don't need china. we need this. i’ll add more here . why did the anglo-saxons create aus, yes, the new

military-political union is the usa canada uk australia is just a counterweight. china, after all, mainly in order to, let's say, oppose china's military-including military-political economic influence in this whole thing. uh, let's say the endo chinese zone and today . in general, we can assume only one thing, that in this situation. they will not change, the leaders of the chinese. not now the question will formulate. do you remember when antipilus landed in taiwan, everyone said, where is it, where is the reaction? why didn’t they shoot down and well, people who understand say that they are in chinese traditions. yes, especially before the 20th congress. wait for the 20th congress, and then the answer will be the answer of this fall 's political events. if we ignore the war. this is the us election and the twentieth party. eh, here it is necessary to say directly that, of course, there are certain political struggles in the chinese leadership. name it discussions somehow. otherwise, it is hidden, but this is a chinese

tradition. so it has always been present, but what the americans have done now for the first time in many years, they tried artificially, putting pressure on china to intervene in this fight. and here, for example, is a visiting antipilo. they tried to show what they see, but the leader is allegedly weak in china, that is, with these provocations to destabilize the situation in e. in china itself, provoke some kind of public discontent a and perhaps even a split in the chinese leadership. there have never been so many publications of some inventions somewhere justified by various contradictions that now exist in beijing, probably, in the west there has never been, as they are now for this congress. uh, attention riveted, incredible but really sitimpin. here for a long time they wondered what tactics he would choose; he chose the right tactics of no escalation. as it is written from the side of china no very calmly weighed e he brings the situation to the twentieth congress. he needs to secure his

political positions within the chinese leadership. but after that we will see a really already defined line, based on the support of the communist party. he wanted to add that in general, uh, china never escalates in the world, unlike those who accuse it of this, just the anglo-saxons, they constantly escalate around china they tried to do, uh, both at sea and on land, and this does not mean leader. in china , he made some decision on taiwan in order to exacerbate this situation somewhere. this is the first second e, most importantly, we must look from the point of view of belarus, it is beneficial for us that china be stable and strong, this is in our interests. i am convinced that after this congress it will become even more stable and even stronger, but i do not expect militant rhetoric from china after this congress is held, china will pursue the same policy and tactics of defending its national interests, but in chinese it means calmly

thoughtfully and using a saying. the most terrible weapon is not the an rocket, so they will slowly move, the best war is the one that was not in fact or not on the river bank, wait for the last time in quality, there may be conclusions. today we are in , uh, as it were, a conversation around the main such thesis on security. i offer a small fragment of the meeting. with a block, alexander lukashenko , listen right now, we will adequately respond to any opponent. we didn't prepare for this alone. ten years. if necessary, we will answer. god forbid, of course, the conditions are betrayed, if our intelligence and the military and civilian committee of state security does not miss something and does not call, therefore we must know everything that happens near our borders, without escalating the

situation. i want you to understand. if you want peace, you must always prepare for war all your life, and everything is good. this will be good. therefore, in order to prevent any collisions and manifestations. we military people must have plans in advance to counter all kinds of scoundrels, who are trying to drag us into a fight. we must not let them drag us into war. this is our main task. there should be no war on the territory of belarus, everything is clear, this task is for the military, but for all of us, this is for the belarusians. here are the tasks. this is what is required of us. here is the current situation oleg sergeevich you know, i know very well now the mood of people, because people are

worried when i drive. this is fine. people are tense. they see what is happening around the country. here. i want to address them and listened carefully meeting with the president. there are two such thoughts that, it seems to me, must be conveyed to every person. first, don't panic. do not be afraid. here, in order for everything to be calm in our country, there are two aspects for me. the first unity of the country is truly unity. let's now discard all these disputes, we are belarusians. we have a president. let's unite and be everyone . this is the second aspect to do your own thing at your workplace and not panic. if we are united, i have always been convinced of my country. we can only destroy it ourselves, no one will destroy it, not by military means, not by sanctions. this has already been confirmed, probably, by everyone there. they know this. therefore, they have a bet that someday they will try to destroy from the inside, so if we are united, we will do our every business, and the military knows its business and the army. we will support now. i hope these conversations are

over. remember reduce the army to remove the kgb mvd cut twice. well, what did we have now, if we had reduced, and remember, this is all a small professional army of a couple thousands and more we do not need anything. and that what we now we spoke in a hurry. uh, mobilization would be carried out. no, we have been doing this for 30 years, so we ended up in the special service , so put aside this stupidity of being united and doing our own and not panicking. our guys want to sow panic, everyone opens this destructive telegram channel. panic. mobilization tomorrow. tomorrow is war. no need to panic intelligence agencies do their job. thank you, you know, i still remember. e! 2010, when we worked out the latest version of the concept of national security. we will say so after all. hmm , they took it on occasion. some circles wrote that we have a military threat. no, there is only a source of military threat. here is today. here the head of state said that it is time to move away from these weak, let's say, definitions of deficits, there is a military threat. and today

. i would say that it is necessary to spell out the national security concept in the new edition more clearly so that the emphasis on security sounds tougher and recommendations for minimizing the neutralization of these threats sounded specifically as an indication of the specific state that emanates. and why not. why should we leave? he also told the president that there is no need to leave something, write directly, as it is. you see, julia konstantin well, it seems to me that consolidation is our main thing, we need to unite. and most importantly, the main thing is really not to panic and just work, everyone in their place, work and ensure a normal life inside the country, and we have a border, as we understand it, locked up, and we should be are you sure what? if, god forbid, the president says, something happens, we will give a decent answer, but we must work and preserve our state the way we want to see it and develop it. thank you for the

president giving an example of how to act in this situation - it is a cold mind to maintain not complacency, but calmness. uh, clear balanced decisions are required to act as a team. this is very important what strong belarusians have always been. we call it in different ways there it is loka, but this important point is trust and solidarity with our armed forces, if the knowledge that we are belarusians and our task is to protect this corner of the earth, which has always already established itself as a corner of the world of stability, and this is in our power. and, of course, to believe in our allies of the russian federation, and i think that this is the guarantee that we will pass with dignity. the path to an extremely difficult environment for the whole world. thank you very much for participating in our program for today.

panorama in the studio of ekaterina tikhomirova and the main events of this day are on air science, agrarian theme and philosophical conversation about modernity several meetings at once in the palace of independence details after a few minutes a barrier from one's own will.