at least the fact that in europe the united states does not have tactical nuclear weapons. there is the most low-power bomb, which is in the us nuclear warehouses of the us army, only this is one megane. this is not a tactical nuclear weapon, but a tactical nuclear weapon - this is one and a half 10 kt-10 klotons, which the russian armed forces have this weaponry and that’s all, and therefore bend this topic about the use of non-use, what you scan and they even try to remember how not -no, russia will attack, well attacked created the principle of a special operation that allowed it to within the framework of some military operations to resolve their security issues. i would like to add that hmm the behavior of western countries. it is not just the unconscious conscious that we see it is the conscious escalation of the conflict in europe. the united states of america is extremely interested that this

conflict not only last. not only longer, uh, the stakes in this conflict were raised, but so that as many european countries as possible, as many and as deep as possible in this conflict, moreover, in the european in the union, voices of understanding of this are already being heard literally this week, a number of officials with europe were talking about how, against the backdrop of the energy crisis that is now happening in europe, the united states of america is selling us four times more expensive gas that we used to buy. this is the first second promotion. these rates, of course, must be stated that they are special. the military operation that russia is conducting has moved to a different phase, which means that it is completely different, and this can be seen not only from the personnel changes that e happened in the ministry of defense of the russian federation but also in russian tactics e, the stakes were raised and mobilization was carried out and secrets. there is no more than that, uh hmm, there is also an informational effect here. remember literally a week ago, and especially after

the crimean bridge was blown up, how western and ukrainian propaganda said that russia was losing everything. look, we are already blowing up with impunity , the crimean bridge. on monday, the whole world saw that it was far, far away, to put it mildly, far from reality, more in addition, european tabloids outraged very ukrainian propagandists by the fact that, firstly , they wrote the truth that the attacks on the ukrainian infrastructure were a response to the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge and the minister of foreign affairs. ukraine urgently tried. edit all the world's media what do you write? this is not so, but the world media, by the way, did not succumb. they kept writing it. this very effect is not kind of like rejoiced. but what did they create? sai- here they made a mistake, they all began to rejoice in writing on twitter there, how happy they are with the population and they saw it created the first feeling that this is a

terrorist attack and ukraine is behind it and russia has the right to a legitimate strike. it was the general feeling. eventually. now let's go to bed. here are the kulebs - in general, you represent the minister of foreign affairs as a disgrace. ukraine sits in a hotel and says, because someone, uh, blew his brain. he says, i do n’t know what’s going on in kiev at all, says the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine yes, it happened in general , then they began to rewind. this is all they say. well, they were all so happy the beginning of the brand is photographed and says, no, it's not us, because they looked at the mood of western citizens. they say so. you are right that you fucked up the infrastructure. and what do you want? you hit the bridge and you will be answered and, by the way, very important processes are taking place in the west, influential people. people like elon musk and not only he alone began to say things, understanding the position of russia, understanding this argument. it is no longer marginal. there are retired politicians, some analysts of the second

fifth category. this is a person using more authority than many european leaders put together. let's see ukraine was very revealing, because much more support was expected. she didn't receive it. even biden, when they talked and said that if you then go complain that he says weapons, next time i will ask you to select, but at the same time, let's have more, but let's get back to this and listen. and what kind of statements? the fact is that the white house gives extremely contradictory statements, it seems that one head, says one thing. the second is completely different. on the one hand , they heard the united states is not looking for a conflict with russia and will not send troops to ukraine biden. he made it clear that this is very clear. the united states also does not want the conflict in ukraine to acquire a nuclear dimension. we heard no reasons for this, and immediately after that, the united states does not exclude anything in the issue of supplying tactical missiles to kiev. well, bolton, too, he got into

such an informational mainstream. this is an ex -adviser to the president of the united states on national security, and putin made a statement as the president of russia is a key person for the russian army. this makes it one of the targets on our list. well, probably the icing on the cake. in this case, this is a statement made by nato before the speech. from a meeting with the ministers of defense of the alliance, stoltenberg declares in general that he takes off his masks and everything is called by its proper name . russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine will become a defeat for nato. this cannot be allowed, the united states is a direct participant in the conflict. it's not a secret. and what the general said secretary. nato was clear a long time ago and not only the united states, but practically all western countries and the entire nato alliance - more than 52 countries are now opponents of russia for the second moment, while yesterday there was a voice with france where the french foreign minister said that we cannot to refuse

contacts with russia should continue the dialogue , what is it to talk about? i also support france's case that the western elites are also divided, the united states of america is now raising this aggressive rhetoric and raising stakes in the war, one of the goals is just to force europe to continue to be united in order to act in the interests of the united states, but interests in europe are, well, not quite different. they are completely different. in this case, we are all talking about the elites about such global snakes, and the people yes, people who have long understood and disassembled, judging by the comments in uh, in social networks. they have been for a long time. well, they took their side, how they treat refugees from ukraine, yes, that is, against them, how much they are inclined, that is, people cannot understand why military operations are of concern to russia there , ukraine does not care about the lives of citizens of european states and states and the united states

of america, citizens were left behind, that is, all the means that when there was an emergency in florida, yes, then they said that on the flora of du money was not found much less than the amount it ukraine please. yes, yes, the threats to us are growing. now we have to focus even more on that. and what, why do we differ. you already said what happened. some strange unhealthy intoxication in ukrainian society, warmed up, of course, by propaganda and the kiev regime. what did they start talking about? so it turned out to be the crimean bridge, or should we not make the crimean bridge 2-3, and so on, separated by a comma, the president of belarus has been collecting for a week. ah, the power block. eh, here each moment parses separately. we see that he keeps his finger on the pulse, and specifically about these intoxicated people, he also gave a completely clear signal. let's listen to a fragment, then we'll discuss it over informal

channels. as far as it was, perhaps we were warned by him to strike at belarus from the territory of ukraine. well, as it was stated, we will make it so that it will be the crimean bridge, 2 my answer was just bring it to the president of ukraine and others. the insane, if they are still there, that the crimean bridge will seem like flowers to them. there is only they will touch with their dirty hands, at least one meter of our territory. i would like to comment on this by the fact that today these about the southern borders of belarus have been formed and are clearly working 15.000 grouping of the armed forces of ukraine only the armed forces of ukraine without cakes, without uh, the national guard and other armed forces and the same uh, the same border guards when although they say that in general, there are belarusian border guards, that the border guards are from

that, uh, side have already fled and there go drunk to work out, firstly, all bridges are destroyed. on the main directions of access to belarus, moreover, almost the entire territory was mined, two entrances and exits were left. and this is all increased by militarization, again why is it that today the original grouping of troops of the forces of e, numbering about 5,000 people, is already unfolding and unfolding, these are the belarusian and russian armed forces that will stand on the western borders, because on the other side 2/3 of the ground forces of poland are already concentrated at the borders. belarus 2/3. this does not mean that 25,000 us troops are still stationed in poland yesterday , but zelensky's proposal before the heads of j7 to invite international as he said observers in ukrainian belarusian border. here's some kind of design. well,

you know, in my opinion, there medvedev has already spoken about zelensky and i don’t want to repeat the words, but it was or. they are already slipping some options on him, we are slipping you understand, this is one question that he himself no longer has reasonable decision. here, uh, the first one. i want to comment on two points president. why is the right the biggest risk, about which we are talking now, the possibility of some kind of strikes against belarus, this is the floor. they are the independence of the neighboring countries, which us days surround, ukraine or poland is not the same lithuania, unfortunately, to ask who, what these countries have in case it is necessary for the americans to throw them into the conflict zone, no one will now about zelensky's first application zelensky is absolutely not an independent figure of guarantee peace from zelensky is worth nothing, like any of his words that he said recently. did he say it himself, i doubt what the risk is? what troops does he invite in order to observe nato on the border of belarus? so for us, this for us, another concentration.