the tags above tactics are clear that at that time lukashenko did not yet have such a clearly built vertical line under which one could answer the west, no, we won’t withdraw and not fall under deafening fire, pressure is still a contract. on the withdrawal was signed in the ninety-third president lukashenko became in the ninety-fourth, but the procedure for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons. it ended only in 1996, of course, we don’t need nuclear weapons in order to keep everyone around in fear or god forbid to bang, but the whole joke is that then we promised. take him out of the country and you won’t have problems with us, only the young lukashenka fulfilled his part of the agreement, and the problem from the west did not decrease until now and pulled. and if we have nuclear weapons. we would have less problems from the west today and a position in response to the deployment of nuclear warheads at our borders. we will place the same ones at our place extremely fairly, i share the position of those who are in the

whole world, but i adequately understand that there has never been such a thing in the world and never will be on manifestation of strength. it is necessary to respond only with proportionate force, alas, but this is also justice. and on the basis of this experience of almost three decades, lukashenka allows himself to criticize his partners in public as well. i would even say partners allow him to criticize himself, for now, alas. you are forced to acknowledge the absence. in some cases, mutual support of principled national position. effective joint counteraction to sanctions pressure continues to be constrained. west, i also really like the words context and subtext, so i he simply added that alexander grigoryevich said this at the site in kazakhstan. although resisting economic pressure, no matter how important. it was strategically not in the first place today for the residents of the cis in the top for all ukraine and military confrontation, because this is a danger. here and now it is

hypothetically and real deaths, here and now. although, as for me, from western economic terrorism. if measures are not taken, much more people will suffer and die than from the conflict in ukraine, it will simply be stretched out in time, not so noticeably less loudly and with less evidence of causation. well , okay. did alexander lukashenko speak about ukraine, mainly because russian and american journalists are completely united in one desire to find out something from someone who is not directly involved in the conflict, but knows everything wishful thinking can be passed off. and, in general, we are not very worried. although it is not to be members. names are not god bless him. with all the consequences, of course, in ukraine, lukashenka spoke briefly and very frankly in nbc interview. it all depends on the united

states of america and great britain if you understand and agree that tomorrow we need to sit down at the table and agree. trust me within a week. we agreed whether ukraine was discussed at the summits in astana and in addition to the cis forum, there was also a summit meeting on interaction and confidence building measures in asia, which was held on thursday, i’m sure about ukraine there too but in a closed format without the press in general, all astana meetings differed greatly from previous business trips in the president by the fact that the negotiations closed from prying eyes were very many. this applies to both forums and bilateral ones. meetings it is categorically important what the presidents of belarus and turkey spoke about in astana, but journalists and meetings did not receive a single word, a word of direct speech was later commented on by the press secretary of the president, natalya eu, for example. china vice president of the people's republic of china in antishan today, the president had a substantive conversation, during which a lot of things were discussed

, and practically the issues of belarusian-chinese relations and in the future , a meeting between the presidents of belarus and the chairman the prc also had a brief conversation on the sidelines of the summit with the emir. qatar is again the control and revision of ongoing joint projects meeting with the prime minister of pakistan and during the recent negotiations in samarkand, mechanisms were identified. on the development of relations of this work, the trade economic commissions followed the meeting of foreign ministers in islamabad after the visit of the president of belarus to pakistan . however, the implementation of plans was slowed down immediately realizing this, the prime minister of pakistan proposed meet and have a short talk, and today we agreed again. we must speed up. everything planned will be implemented and in the near future the culmination of the great work done should be the visit of the presidents of pakistan to fundamental meetings. those were held today by the presidents of turkey and kazakhstan. the agenda with kazakhstan is extremely clear in our

relations. there are no problems. we had very intense negotiations with the president of turkey, and in the course of them, an offer suddenly arose to meet in the near future and continue the conversation in ankara of the president belarus offered turkish leader president today talked with colleagues from uzbekistan azerbaijan kyrgyzstan let's talk about something else. poroshenko and erdogan about something very important, for sure, whether they talked about joint measures to resolve the situation in ukraine, most likely. does he even know more about this press secretary? lukashenka i'm quite sure, why isn't it public then? as for me it's obvious, but just in case for the audience, he did not go public in the negotiations. we asked a direct question to the head. makeyu's mida within the closed format of all. yes, you can without fear, let's say so. i want to say that there will be some leaks, and i want to say that this or that issue is openly and frankly discussed at multilateral meetings. e

within the closed format. well, yesterday there were also bilateral contacts of the head of state, there were a lot of them, and i will supplement with all the information about what is happening as it is happening. why when and with whom most people will never know, because it must remain a secret until successful completion. moreover, those who say we we want to know everything we have. right the lord is with you, you will not know what to do with this truth, and how to live with it. just believe me, i will tell you from my own experience, do i know something from the information for a limited circle, people obviously. yes, i am a presidential journalist, and i have always strived to know what others do not know, but i did not take into account something in this aspiration. i will not complain now in any case, i repeat, the presidential pool. this is the best job in the world, but i did not teach that it is difficult to live with confidential information, i will explain. to meet, for example, alexander lukashenko with recep tayyip erdogan and let's say i

fly to work in istanbul and get access to information that is not for the general public. it 's great for understanding the work and understanding the situation, of course, but i'll be back. i will be invited to minsk as a friend to sit in a bar and talk about the meeting between lukashenka and erdogan, they say. what did they talk about, what will happen next, and all my friends will be interested in this conversation, but not to me, because they are discussing versions. and i know exactly how it was, but i can’t say about it i don’t have rights and do not consider it necessary. in the end, i'm not interested in them, because i'm not interested in the version when you know the facts, and they are not interested in me, because i am silent and do not show any interest in the discussion. but by the way, those who demand, we all want to know, you need to be grateful to lukashenka because the president says it like it is and believe me, he often gives the command. tell it to people when they bring him information for official use. war is on the world is busy

now uh, the problems are looking for an answer to the question. who guilty listen, then we'll figure out who 's to blame every day people are dying, let's stop the war and agree, and then we'll figure out who is right? who's guilty? this is probably a normal formula, and we started the process of negotiations, but it stopped. zelensky was forbidden to negotiate. who meet evgeniya my youngest goddaughter? i have three of them in total, and i also have a daughter and a wife. so i am surrounded by girls and in astana at the summit of the meeting on cooperation and confidence building measures in asia, i constantly thought about evgenia zhenechka almost as soon as i learned to speak at least somehow, i repeated to me come to me, it was impossible to speak and come to me turned into blue. i responded to igor or godfather to speak. it's difficult for her. so they began to call me even later, if not, it got a short form, sika so i became for eugene, i don’t mind sika, if only she was always so

happy when we met, why svm, yes, at the english conference - he is infraxon config, building mezhos in age or abbreviation sika a, sika is pronounced exactly like sika exactly the same as she calls me i confess i did not know evgeny and was not ready to hear from the presidents. zhenya at the word so i understand lukashenka very well when he says, for the sake of the future of our children, at 20 you can’t understand this. my name is igor tur. that was my propaganda.

what's going on with you? mom is dying. i'm a doctor never say that the patient is hopeless. i'm nothing i'm katya and who are you, do you hear katya duc is from here? you know how then magazines, read about me beloved. i wanted a tube of pieces, insidious oleg, and we'll go somewhere else with you. dialect where you look melodrama bird on sunday on belarus 24 tv channel? in our project we will show you