what's going on with you? mom is dying. i'm a doctor never say that the patient is hopeless. i'm nothing i'm katya and who are you, do you hear katya duc is from here? you know how read about me beloved. i used to be stronger and could drive all day long. and we'll go somewhere else with you. the dialect where you watch the melodrama bird on sunday on belarus 24 tv channel in our project we will show you unique

personalities, for example, 2 hours in paris and i know paris, that is, i will come there, i am absolutely calmly guided richer than man. but you see, i've got this collecting machine. maybe they break stereotypes by example and their own experience does not necessarily have to feel something to break something. eh, something here, as if to try on the tooth. they thought i had poo, in fact i have it in every issue. to buy a room apartment or build this model to break stereotypes, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. we didn’t crush the new day and

rob them to our music, i kai intradermal of us. i attacked sur at the sun at not timid hands at the tips of our fingers, the music on pkhne, making us think and opening thousands of roads before us, music can change color. pokulki, i desktop look music inside the skin

we will spend one day with incredible people. i like to watch when the combines go into the field, grind the bunker and pour it out into the car, you will see somewhere interesting. let's get

to know them with their hobbies and favorite work. we don’t have a problem, let’s work around the clock to grow this bread, see one day project on belarus 24 tv channel. removed from the city mitusni here is your face and your strength. true pirate cop. forgive

yourself. to get carried away and tear off a special one. she got wet and i told them. dermal croc and one not with nature wild watchdog yelnya belarus hello everyone. who is with us today are extremely eventful and disturbing days

strikes on the crimean bridge missile arrivals on the critical infrastructure of ukraine the statement of the polish leadership about the views of american nuclear weapons zelensky about preventive strikes. yes, and in general the nuclear topic has ceased to be taboo and firmly established itself in the political information flow in one frantsevich, how the world has come to the point that we are already playing the nuclear topic. so the starter is just a frank confrontation, then, especially the confrontation of nuclear superpowers or great powers, whatever you want to call it. well, listen, it's no secret. and we talked a lot about this, everyone is talking about it, and what is going on is a struggle not between russia and ukraine, not even between russia and nato, but between russia and the united states, these are the two largest nuclear powers, if the stakes are constantly are already rising, it comes to how to divide russia how to weaken it? how to defeat, the question of nuclear weapons naturally arises, this is almost the most that happened exactly 60 exactly these october days 60 years ago during the

caribbean crisis, but for now this is rhetoric, here we are, when we analyze we must see indicators, indicators of what is really about whether it is being discussed or not. look, everyone is talking about nuclear weapons, but russian officials don't talk about it at all. this time. whether believe in it in the west. look, they say everything russia here. now, after the raisins , he will use nuclear weapons, while the american embassies continued to be in kiev. uh, the western embassy, ​​including the american advisory mission and so on, cost russia to strike with conventional weapons, that is, missiles , at the ukrainian infrastructure. they immediately announced the withdrawal, in fact. what does it say rhetoric increases the escalation deliberately trying to provoke the military of the russian federation to these new steps for what in order to c international pressure on our including the union state, and in order

to continue to throw the ukrainian people into this bloody meat grinder, the key events, of course, of the last days that we are all discussing. this is a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge , and he, too, threw down his masks with, uh, uh, according to the principle of who is our friend and who is a stranger. followed by strikes on critical infrastructure in kiev and other ukrainian cities. and here are the experts immediately alexander ivanovich started talking about the fact that everything is a new level, firstly, do you agree that this is some kind of new level of confrontation. and if yes, then what is the essence of this level, which we have reached aside. well, what you said from here is quite true, and in principle, this indicates the level of political thinking today. especially western. how next. that is, more tension, more misunderstandings, and more and more to leave. let's just say that some

reasonable policy today is the policy of western states. she at all doesn't suffer from any prudence at all. they no longer suffer from this prudence. the kind only mentally any deviations go deviations. not only that, i can say today that such things are already allowed. uh, yesterday, for example, it passed that two members should be removed from russia, china, respectively, brother of the security council. he, well, yes, ruined the entire system of international security. now russia still needs by secret ballot to see who to punish later for himself by the speech of a pleasant representative of gazprom the french representative who chaired the meeting of the security council simply did not allow this to be done. i mean, we just see. uh, comes with dressy ones. these are the political things that fully influence the

military-political situation today. it escalates and again the use of tactical nuclear weapons. this is a rather interesting topic, if only because the united states does not have tactical nuclear weapons in europe. there is the most low-yield bomb, which is in the us nuclear warehouses of the us army, only this is one megaton. it's not tactical anymore nuclear weapons, and tactical nuclear weapons are one and a half to 10 kilotons, one and a half to ten kilotons, which these weapons of the russian armed forces have and that’s all, and therefore bend this topic about the use of non-use, what you scan and they even try to remember how not, russia will attack. well, he attacked. in principle, she created a special operation that allowed her to solve her security issues as part of some military operations. i would like to add that hmm the behavior of western

countries. it's just not unconscious. consciously what we see is a conscious escalation of the conflict in europe. the united states of america is extremely interested that this conflict not only last. for longer, not only, uh, the stakes in this conflict have been raised, but for as many european countries as possible, as many and as deep as possible to be mired in this conflict , moreover, voices are already heard in the european union understanding this literally this week, a number of officials with europe spoke about how it is so against the background of energy the crisis that is now happening in europe in the united states of america is selling us four times the price of gas that we used to buy. this is the first second promotion. these are the stakes, of course. hmm, it must be stated that the specialist. the military operation that russia is conducting has moved to a different phase, which means it’s completely different, not only from the personnel changes that took place in the ministry of defense of the russian federation, but also in russia’s tactics, the stakes have

been raised and mobilization has been carried out and secrets. there is no more than that, uh hmm there is more information effect. remember literally a week ago, and especially after the crimean bridge was blown up, how western and ukrainian propaganda said that russia was losing everything. look, we are already blowing up with impunity , the crimean bridge. on monday, the whole world saw that it turned out to be far, far away, to put it mildly, far from reality, moreover, european tabloids outraged very ukrainian propagandists by the fact that, firstly , they wrote the truth that the attacks on ukrainian infrastructure were a response to the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge and minister for foreign affairs. ukraine urgently tried. edit all the world's media what do you write? this is not so, but the world media, by the way, did not succumb. they kept writing it. this very effect is not kind of like rejoiced. but what did they create? say - here they made a mistake,

they all began to rejoice in writing on twitter there, how happy they are with the population, and they saw it, they created the first feeling that this is a terrorist attack and ukraine is behind it and russia has the right to a legitimate strike. it was the general feeling. eventually. now let's go to bed. here are the kulebs - in general, you represent the minister of foreign affairs as a disgrace. ukrainian sits in the hotel says, so who is there? uh, brainwashed. he says, i don’t know what’s going on in kiev at all, says the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine yes , it happened in general, then they began to rewind. this is all they say. here, they were so happy all the beginning of the brand were photographed and said, no, it's not us, because they looked at the mood of western citizens. they say so. you are right that you fucked up the infrastructure. and what did you want? you hit the bridge and you there will be an answer and, by the way, very important processes in the west are taking place by influential people. people like elon musk and not

only he alone began to say things, understanding the position of russia, understanding this argument. it is no longer marginal. there are retired politicians, some analysts of the second fifth category. this is a man who enjoys more authority than many european leaders put together. let's look at ukraine, it was all very indicative, because much more support was expected. she didn't get it. even biden when they talked and said that if you will then go complain that he gives weapons next time to allocate, but at the same time, let us have more, but let's get back to this and listen. and what kind of statements? the fact is that the white house makes extremely contradictory statements, it seems that one head, says one thing the second is completely different. on the one hand , they heard the united states is not looking for a conflict with russia and will not send troops to ukraine biden. he made it clear, this is very clear. the united states also does not want the conflict in ukraine to acquire a nuclear dimension; they see no reason for this

we heard, and immediately after that, the united states does not rule out anything on the issue of supplying tactical missiles to kiev. well, bolton, too, he got into such an informational mainstream. this is an ex -adviser to the president of the united states on national security, and putin made a statement as the president of russia is a key person for the russian army. this makes it one of the targets on our list. well, probably the icing on the cake. in this case, this is a statement made by nato before the speech. meetings with ministers of defense the stoltenberg alliance declares in general it takes off its masks and calls everything by its proper name . russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine will become a defeat for nato. this cannot be allowed, the united states is a direct participant in the conflict. it's not a secret. and what the secretary general said was clear a long time ago and not only the united states, but practically all the countries of the west, and the entire nato alliance - more than fifty-two

countries are now opponents of russia for the second moment, while yesterday a voice was heard from france where the minister of astral affairs of france said that we could not refuse contacts with russia should continue the dialogue , what is it to talk about? i support france’s case that the western elites are also divided, the united states of america , now raising this aggressive rhetoric and raising the stakes in the war, one of the goals is to force europe to continue to be united in order to act in the interests of the united states, but the interests in europe - well, not quite different. they are completely different. in this case, we are all talking about the elites about such global snakes, and the people yes, people who have long understood and disassembled, judging by the comments in uh, in social networks. they have been for a long time. well, they took their side, how they treat refugees from ukraine, yes, that is, against them, how much they are opposed, that is, people cannot understand

why military operations are of concern there russia ukraine does not care about the lives of citizens of european states and states and the united the citizens of the united states of america were left behind, that is, all the funds that were there when there was an emergency in florida, yes, then they said that there was no money for florida there was much less than the amount she ukraine , please, yes, yes, the threats to us are also growing. now we have to focus even more on that. and what, why do we differ. you already said what happened. some strange unhealthy intoxication in ukrainian society. warmed up, of course, but also by propaganda and the kiev regime. what did they start talking about? so it turned out to be the crimean bridge, or should we not make the crimean bridge 2-3, and so on, separated by a comma, the president of belarus has been collecting for a week. ah, the power block. eh, every moment makes out separately. we see that he keeps his finger on the pulse, and specifically about these

intoxicated people, he also gave a completely clear, uh, signal. let's listen to a fragment, then we'll discuss it through informal channels. as far as it was, perhaps we were warned by him to strike at belarus from the territory of ukraine. well, as it was stated, we will make it so that it will be the crimean bridge, 2 my answer was just bring it to the president of ukraine and others. the insane, if they are still there, that the crimean bridge will seem like flowers to them. there are only they will touch by their own citizens, at least to one meter of our territory. i wanted to comment on this by the fact that today, on the southern borders of belarus, 15,000 groups of the armed forces of ukraine have been formed and are clearly working, only the armed forces of ukraine without cakes, without uh, the national guard and other

armed forces and the same uh, the same border guards when although they say that in general, there are belarusian border guards there, that the border guards stop, and the parties have already fled, and drunks go there to work out, firstly, all bridges are destroyed. on the main directions of access to belarus, moreover, almost the entire territory was mined, two entrances and exits were left. and this is all being increased by militarization, again from the west. why is it that today the original grouping of troops of the forces of e, numbering about 5,000 people, is unfolding and unfolding, these are the belarusian and russian armed forces that will stand on the western borders, because on the other side 2/3 of the ground forces of poland are already concentrated at the borders. belarus 2/3. it doesn't talk about what else are 25,000 us troops in poland yesterday and zelensky’s proposal

to the heads of the g7 to invite international observers on the ukrainian belarusian border, as he said. here's something for the design. well, you know, in my opinion, medvedev already spoke about zelensky there and i don’t want to repeat the words, but it was or it’s already being slipped on him . you understand, this is one question, that he himself no longer has a reasonable solution. here, uh, the first one. i want to comment on two points president. why is the biggest one right? the risk, about which we are now talking about the possibility of some kind of strikes on belarus, is the complete lack of independence of the neighboring countries that surround us for days, ukraine or poland are not the same lithuania, unfortunately, asks who, what these countries have in case, if it is necessary for the americans to throw them into the conflict zone, no one will now about zelensky’s first application zelensky is absolutely not an independent figure of zelensky’s peace guarantee, like any word he has said lately. did he say it himself?

i'm not sure what the risk is. what kind of troops does he invite to observe on the border, belarus nato so for us, this is another concentration of nato troops on legal grounds on the territory of ukraine close to our border, and we will believe. and how many times we have been deceived over these 30 years, or and now we will take it and say. we believe, we believe that you, if you want, good goals are generally immune, in general, we immediately understand how they will observe, which should clearly understand our citizens and the countries that surround us everything that we are doing now. here are the president’s commands to strengthen the border to strengthen the grouping to deploy the russian belarusian grouping, it’s just aimed at the world aimed at leveling the threats from them this lack of independence of these countries why so that those who actually make the decision see what consequences they can lead to rash acts, because the rules for preventing

war are the same, the stronger you are, the less the probability that there will be a war the weaker you will be destroyed. by the way, the president is right, holding one meeting after another in public, directing the generals. e for a briefing with the public in labor collectives in general. so unusual. and why is this being done? this is the line of war prevention. these are the actions of creating an allied group. we show the enemy. first. we all know your plans. well, you understand that if the military people see that their plans are revealed , preventive actions are taken, but why would they jump on the rampage? they will suffer losses and not achieve, we see these plans as a result. we, uh, convey clear, open information to society. right now, when somewhere the russian society criticized the ministry of defense. why because the information was coming, uh, not in the way it should have been, and certain problems naturally arose in connection with this. here, it's just out in the open. uh, the top military

leadership comes, uh, to teams and talking to people. but i would n't underestimate e's independence here. uh, some its line, which is being pursued by more. the same baltic states and ukraine but they are not cunning. i don't know for sure, for example. the application, which zelensky solemnly signed to nato, he himself came up with or was prompted to, there are some moments there. he was also denied to him. and this was denied in general. uh, it could be predicted, as far as the invitation is concerned, the so-called observation mission or international mission, as he stated. well, this is one of the reasons for the advancement of the same polish troops. e here about the concentration, where they are standing here, one can argue, of course, because they have four main formations - these are three mechanized divisions, it is the so -called armored caliermen of the eleventh tank. they are constantly moving. that is , the border of the southern state is getting closer. all borders

between states. not so they are here they are, as the president said he takes away for 100 km, for which, in fact, several battalions of regular polish troops are already in ukraine in one form or another, they simply don’t use a battalion. in the same place, we already see that in the course of fighting on the fronts. soldiers show up. well, there they are on vacation in britain. therefore, they are moving like this, and now conditions are being created for the input. with what is it dangerous in the share of the hot border, the hot borders, and the ukrainian troops will be nato, that is, any clash. this is what our military men were talking about, when these same taroboronists or border guards come out and aim in our direction, it can lead to some kind of armed provocation, that is, they deliberately want to frame their european allies of the americans are under attack, and here there is one nuance that the americans will not intercede for them in this case. now, if yes,

now, if, for example, there was a provocation even on the belarusian lithuanian border. this is the fifth article of the nato charter without question. and if on ukrainian territory, then it’s you poles and ukrainians who understand. we ourselves will supply you with tactical ones. and so all these, and so these kms yes , for 300 km, which are a magnifying glass. and so on, but i myself agree wow, but i just don’t believe at all that the usa is for someone in europe at all intercede. they both sat at home across the ocean, and will continue to supply weapons and dispose of them. and you yourself never need to create this joint grouping of article five, because many of us see how they interpret it. although the president look, and the day before, lieutenant general, minister of defense of belarus viktor ignaevich is fucked again. e, clearly stated that the tasks of the regional grouping of troops are purely defensive, and all the activities currently being carried out are aimed at adequately responding to actions near our borders. well me seems like a man is not a military man, yes, that is, in a different point of view. this is a normal

situation in order, first of all, as already mentioned, to show that we are ready for any development of the situation, and on the other hand, let's allow the population of the republic of belarus to panic, and the network is panic. remember yesterday, yes, on all channels that it may be, a viral mailing from viber that strikes were inflicted on minsk, no one panicked, absolutely no one talked to. all smiled says, well, of course, that is, we should not have panic, but more well the polish side has already been heard several times. uh, the president, in principle, he also touched on this topic, including, communicating with the military, these are the words of the duda that he said . at first, he lamented, what can i say? we do not have nuclear weapons, nothing foreshadows that we will soon have our own and why not negotiate with the americans so that their nuclear weapons end up on our territory. here's how you feel about it you answered called your own question. on this remark, the poles again want to get something else to tear at the expense of another person's hands.

someone who, without substituting himself, so that they would be given everything. they will again allocate their new ones, brothers, the poles play their game they want, but i want to say, these people want to. they want from germany, which means abdugizmania, opposition to nuclear weapons - this is an attribute of the great trees pushing germany aside, and the supply of nuclear weapons will make them the largest military power in europe, as soon as we declared this lie to be scouted. so, as soon as we announced that we had deployed about the grouping, how as soon as we said that we were deploying our grouping, they immediately distributed the words of occupation. the first thing people should know is grouping is provided. not now. it is provided for by the union treaty, which was signed a long time ago , and the second moment they talk about the occupation there, where nato stands dozens of times more than ours. that is, this is not an occupation for them, when they have troops for decades on atabases, they build

new ones, they ask for more and more new bases in the foliage of their soldiers. no, three soldiers is everything else they can count on. it's just now. here three four figuratively speaking, and on the elevator with the general. and the army is descending, they are all counting on nato rotan, and when we act, the allies have an occupation, so who is occupied? it is you who are occupied. you cannot make a single decision on your own . you cannot defend your country. you cannot not impose sanctions, when the americans tell you, and you say occupation , this is it. do you agree with these experts , then he says that at the moment poland has already concentrated so much in western weapons that it has the ability to consider offensive concepts even regardless of plans. still need time. they do plan to expand their armed forces to 300,000 about three times. well, on average , the military budget of poland and the annual increase. they are purchasing not only the stipulated

6 billion dollars. you imagine for the purchase, abrams tanks, they will even have k2 tanks and the south koreans plan to buy more. it has been stated. here, it 's all about hamers. they say you know. how much hummer to buy 500 pieces of launchers, but it's been a long time since they've been gone. basically, so many . and they still need to be produced. they will do this for several years, but really, what is the goal for poland, we talked there in ukraine, but for poland to be able to conduct, without the help of nato allies, military operations with limited goals, but on a regional scale. uh, doesn't it automatically do that, and poland, uh, is a country of a solid red line for, for example, russian. let's do it. that's the word, the red line, we'll forget. uh automatically turns into a threat that is, respectively, that you can come up with your own hands and inflate the escalation out of the blue. here

alexander ivanovich knows. in our doctrine , in our plans, what term is the suwalki corridor? no at all, yes, and it doesn't make sense. well, to understand, kaliningrad is our northwest between them there is a space that separates up to 60 km, sometimes a little more there. more from the baltics and suddenly, out of the blue, we do not conduct any exercises in this country, the poles with the baltic states with the support americans are being inflated as an incredible threat. they say that an american military base should be placed there. this is when trump started, let's call her fort-trump this base. duda there, kneeling or bowing to trump, begging this base to be placed, no threat at all. there is no concentration of troops. in this direction 10 years ago. is this the first time every year when russia belarus conducts exercises every year we discussed in this studio fakes in poland in lithuania that we will attack lithuania tomorrow tomorrow, we will attack poland, moreover, the ordinary

exercises that took place with us, which in general had nothing to do even with them, sometimes they did not have anti-terrorist threats. sometimes they worked out a fake right away, like tanks tanks this week. well, this fake bro again, remember that allegedly belarus supplies and through the burden to russia tanks yes, russia has enough of its tanks, you already wrote that the shells will run out one day russia bombed shells. no, the second day is bombed by shells. no third day to bomb. they say now will end. and today, an american expert wrote the truth, he says, you know, it turns out that russia, even if it doesn’t produce them for half a year, can bomb every day, and they produce the same thing about fakes about our teachings correctly, he blazed good and will, when the theme of the suvorov corridor appeared when the baltic states were accepted into nato, and before that there were no islamic corridor topics here . oh, well, first you created the problem, and then let's solve it. they are money all the time. here the russian tanks will go. after 2 hours already connect the civil area, belarus is a joint grouping. and uh, we

heard that the minister of defense said that in the near future we will receive more iskanders and s400s and, accordingly, more personnel on the belarusian trajectory have already completed a full course of training, this, well, is capable of sobering up those who now say so. enhance the military security of the allied state. naturally, including, belarus is just an increase in security, military security even today. yes, we kind of have polonaises, here, but the addition of iskander i s-400. by the way, uh with 400 works just as part of a training center where our servicemen were trained. he is working in combat training mode, maybe today he is the head of zelensky yerma when the president said dirty hands about grai. he first tweeted there, and then immediately deleted it, because it was explained to him that belarus had something to answer. the fact is that i am the dostaevsky regime that is afraid of the polonaise. there 's an interesting point. they hesitate. here they are performing. there are some of these all sorts

of arrests and other podolians there, yes, well, the belarusian army is weak, not combat-ready, and so on, they went to the azerbaijanis. they asked about the planets. they also have all said strong missiles. they mean that now they are most afraid of polonaises, because even in russia a whole legend is being created around our polonaises that this is some kind of superweapon, they are really afraid of them, but they are doing the right thing to be afraid, because in addition to polonaises we have launchers we have tornadoes. we have hurricanes. that is, what can strike, uh, irreparable and in personnel in manpower, that is, in the equipment of the group that they plan to concentrate. well, what are the states, and 300 km, that is, yes, here is an example of monotonous in different configurations, but , uh, a border grouping. we are guaranteed to destroy, no matter how they swagger. this is the second time. they do not set the goal of an invasion by a large

group now, because again they are talking about their successes in september there. but they understand that they cannot. well, even these 15.000 are not the kind of group that does not can parry. together, our group is an allied state, so they are betting on hybrid invasions of these plans. excuse me, the kgb revealed. this is putting pressure on the belarusian society. here, in the style of rights, the teacher demolished you, how bulak balakhovich acted to invade, arrange terror, seize some settlement and borders , let's talk about it, but, for starters, so that before we talk about this, we must lead the concept, which in in principle, already well- known, but our military. i think the audience paid attention to it. recently, this term is used more and more often. proxy war. we often say hybrid information war, proxying the war in short. the definition, in order to completely understand what it is about, is for an international conflict between two countries that are

trying to achieve their own goals with the help of hostilities taking place on the territory using the resources of a third country. under the guise of resolving an internal conflict. in this third country. there are more additional nuances. we stayed on them. this is when two countries are at war with the hands of a third party. for example, this is a classic. here it was after, and even simpler, so that it was still clear. that's when someone says that in order to establish democracy in this country, he sends troops there or supports terrorist attacks. here it is, here it is a hybrid, but a proxy. look how we in africa, for example, actually fought with the americans. yes, but with the hands of the angola of south africa, while even south africa was under sanctions, and south africa supplied weapons to them from under the counter yes in order for the e regime the proteids are not currently fighting, why then just in the case of a proxy war - this is a classic openly talking about it back in the west, that is. e america is at war with russia, ukraine is not the hands of ukraine and ukraine is a classic when the ussr is a proxy war.

sorry because the collective smell is at war here. not only the us so i wouldn't say it's a pure proxy war. here, in general, the whole west is the whole collective smell. and proxy and hybrid and information, and we go further, and then it lies in the fact that whatever you call it, but there are elements that well, it’s impossible, you know, when we are fascinated looking at what is happening in ukraine, we must not forget that 2020 was an element, proxying for wars, that covid confrontation and how we were pressured for having our own path during the correction. it was a proxy manifestation and what you are now looking at in poland. and you already referred to the head of the state security committee of tertel, who said that detachments are being trained on the territory of ukraine that are going to go in until they capture, there is a separate district center arrange. uh, provocations of sabotage are also

taking place on the part of poland, also taking place in the baltic states, so what is here, how do you see this situation. well actually. eh, here's the configuration, it's understandable. we saw that the escalation began even earlier. the radicalization of these whites, but you need to understand the real forces. they don't represent it. it's an information-propaganda veil, this cabinet, some retired one. e, traitor, traitor to the motherland, e, lieutenant colonel and so on. this is a cover. i've been good, commander. yeah uh who how differently called? yes, but the fact is, i was in lugansk. when back in the summer they were there in the lugansk direction, a group from this regiment of the kneelers was destroyed. there, some of them were simply torn apart completely, someone was even taken prisoner, but they have not been there since. so we must understand, they say, half-clinicalism. there are no regiments there, either in terms of numbers or in the order in which they are used. even

they are not even used in large numbers, because guys from the russian group and from the donbass really work on them. only they see them. they will be destroyed by their small groups, as part of individual units, the apu is used to work for us. femilnitsky created the center of khmelnitsky, uh, in my opinion, the eighth regiment of the special forces of ukraine, where these measures are being worked out for us . the main directorate of intelligence, which is headed by one of the most radical terrorist-minded representatives of the kiev regime, a young ambitious wolf such as kirill budanov. uh, these people are absolutely crazy a and they set a goal on holding. here is a full-fledged terrorist sabotage war against belarus. but we must clearly understand this and our leadership in this, they say, we see it. and we must also clearly understand that , by the way, the chairman of the kgb also talked about this a

lot, and this can be seen as a political one, that no one has fled. and this is not their decision does not mean that the power in the country can be changed peacefully, let's not talk about it. no one in the open before this was not before there were disputes, maybe peacefully, maybe not visible now, huh? on command, the kgb chairman also spoke about this. they are fully manageable, including the creation of a joint headquarters - this is a team of the united states of america, of course. the chairman of the kgb talked a lot about this, that it was necessary to unite them. and this is the us team. despite the fact that he told how some of them, like those ladies there, have their own ambitions, share the money. they did not want to unite. but here's what we must clearly understand. the first is only the military way. they see terrorism as extremism and second. look at people openly talking about terrorism extremism, and the strange thing they are not only talking about, shut up don’t talk about it actively, this rhetoric is supported by the fugitives who are needed

to justify a possible terrorist attack on belarus they are carried out by western intelligence services. the face of these terrorist threats will be the fugitives, including some traitors who carry them out, that they must know that they will be the first to destroy. here they should at least think a little about themselves, they are those who are about it now openly, he says, this will be the legitimate goal of the belarusian special services in the event of such a development of events. they may be happy to think about themselves, someone will give them now, they will destroy them, in general there is some kind of evil oleg sergeevich in this. karma, i don’t know how it can be the worst thing that they are our belarusians there, let the man here be the eye of the man, pushed there to fight. it's fate, that's how it is. here, they are some kind of horugs form. you remember in february there was such a wave, there are also some of our all sorts of

elves, as they call it now in russia, they also ran, supposedly. we will have mobilization here now, they are making friends, what do you think it will be voluntary. it will be the same with the russian fugitives, they need banners. they need the vlasovites, they need bulak bulakhovich. they need those who understandably the main role will be played by western intelligence services. they perfectly represent the combat readiness of these fugitives in practice, but they need a banner for them we need a propaganda effect to put pressure on our country and to put pressure on belarus on russia, see what they are already openly declaring. first, terrorism is not just sabotage extremism. they are on foreign bayonets. they want to get at least some power. this is generally a prefix. here, take away her foreign partisans, yes. well , does anyone really believe that two white precincts and one opera hack into state security systems. this is done by the special services of our neighboring countries, which invest millions of dollars in this, and

two district police officers for 100 euros sits in varshavka, the hotel did not see, says that sergeevich did it let's say, let's directly test the word of the chairman. he named only one of the well, apart from the russian post-soviet, uh, special services that are not working against us now, is a massage. here are all the rest of the cia mi6. everything that is in europe is now working against us. and here he believes, the fugitive district police officer opened the system of the ministry of internal affairs, he could not correctly sort out alcoholics in the zavodskoy district file cabinet, so we need to to figure it out, this topic of partial mobilization appeared in russia. here, in belarus, too , no one even knows the system of mobilization of the belarusian armed forces. we don't have such a system. i don’t know if there are troops in the reserve service in the reserves. ah, we continue to discuss the global topic of national security. now, if earlier it sounded, as you know , some point from a documentary there, from

some concept, here is something that is written somewhere in a book, and now it is alive around us and we feel it on the tips fingers, so here is national security, far from being only now promoted by the term information war. this is not only, of course, military threats. well, this, of course, is also economic security. oh, by the way, in our concepts of national security, economic security is written down, the state of the economy, in which the protection of the national interests of the republic of belarus from internal and external threats is guaranteed. so we saw last week the president collected a large meeting with the economic bloc. uh, say that ask you if you've seen this, they won't do it, because they must have seen and definitely heard. it was tough the president, the guards, that laid bare the main questions, which is exactly how they sound. in a society in a popular way why ? because the issue, for example, rising prices is a favorite topic for any type of coulter to carry out, as they say now, an

information-psychological special operation for enemy propaganda in order to rock society, and so, powerful tasks stop price growth hmm prevent shortages remove intermediaries clearly define those responsible for the implementation of these tasks and so on, but yulia konstantinovna is not by chance the president. uh, it brings together practically in one meeting at one time and the composition coincides with the military threat to economic security. economic security. it is insecurity without the economic security of the state, no other development of another sphere of security can be mobilization, then the economic bloc, just this is finance, but one must also understand that with all these abrupt decisions, hmm, the questions are not for sellers, not for trade, which provides. with that, well, what do we need a question to those who organize this trade to the organizers who receive huge profits, which the

sellers themselves obviously do not go into the economy. they are the same consumers as we are. they come to the store in the same way and understand that prices have risen, so today, hmm, if you miss this moment, when people, uh, managers of retail chains, so let's say, yes, those who receives money as intermediaries who took advantage of the situation when we have a lot of other problems and take advantage of the situation by raising prices and thus making consumers shudder and not understand what is happening, of course, very often not accept prices. as such, not the goal itself. was this meeting. global president. i would like to point out that the times are different, remember how he said the pro-market that there was not and will not be, that if someone needs it here as a strong man, he will do whatever he wants in this one. addressed to the government to those involved in, let's say , regulation of this area, that now is the time to make decisions that are coming down from the situation, so the issue of prices, he is not the first not

the last to explain. here she is again a fake , the president did not have time to hold a meeting, they went fakes. by the way, from those who used to say that the fact that prices are rising - it's bad, as soon as the president held a meeting they kill the market economy, business is destroyed, not, but we are moving almost to war communism, but this is a lie. the truth is what you bought the goods for ruble delivered it abroad to belarus , which means it cost 2 rubles. at work , one and a half rubles, not 10 rubles. after all, let's tell the truth in recent months, that you were observed to come to someone to buy something, a private trader's shop, no matter what you hear a mysterious face. well, you see what is happening around the sanction, so the price is the same, and at the same time he wants to earn 10, this is what we are talking about. the president speaks of justice, no one destroys the market. nobody destroys business. we are talking about a decent game decent rules and the law second moment unless before the sanctions yes, supply chains for

some goods have changed, prices have risen, but perhaps for everything. excuse me, and some goods look like it was produced here, nothing has changed. do not catch your packages. no, pack it up. a friend from life i'll tell you about myself. here i have then a problem the big size of a leg or foot. i always buy shoes. well , i didn’t look on the internet for a long time, one store, like the price of me, but imported okay, but russian and belarusian. there are very popular belarusian manufacturers. why they raised prices in this online store and they doubled there, well, there by 60%. what kind of supply chains have changed here they say they are buying here somewhere on the territory of a union state. indeed, this is a speculative effect, however, it should be noted that with us now it is not just some kind of praise for them. it 's real. so we know these people are a very good economic bloc and we have, uh, uh, deputy chief of staff, who are supervised by both presidential aide and

economic ministers. these are really learned people who lay out the situation. they do not just explain, but manage the processes, and we have achieved certain results. the results, as the minister of economy said, yes, the threats that began with, uh, winter, spring, they had to be stopped in the summer. we have reached a certain plateau. now we are entering a small, but, nevertheless, growth in this situation, when the enemy expected to bring down our economy , this did not happen. a but the president drew attention to pricing and now we will connect with the military group. why, among other things, did we need russian troops here, what the enemy wants us to get into an arms race, put our entire economy armed for military needs, this will cause social dissatisfaction with our coalition interaction, as the military doctrine in its new edition of the end of the 21st year with the russian federation is written, it allows both russia and

us to save money . we also decided to create a southern operational command. not so, well, actually grouping to replace it. what is command? right now, any north pod to the west is two mechanized brigades. we need the rocket artillery brigade, we need the engineer regiment. well, approximately in this composition, this is additional expenses, creating a combined grouping. we save money and so in everything from the pricing of the purchase of raw materials to the sale of products entering new markets. here are the numbers. let's voice them. we have increased our volume in the russian market. we'll be peaking soon. our peak figures were in the late nineties 11% our share now we have reached eight. we have increased our presence in the chinese market and these are the tasks facing our products-manufacturer. and by the way, speaking of joining the shanghai organization cooperated cooperation. why caused such a hysteria among the fugitives? to be honest, i did not

expect all scos in our state militaries. here are the positive consequences, less attention was paid than that of the enemy, well, they themselves were frightened, because we are leaving no international isolation. to the largest markets see what is the market of india what is the market of china what is the market of iran the market of pakistan a. they are ready with us to cooperate with the dollar, they argued that the euro dollars would be russia and the belarusian ruble would collapse. what happened? and by the way, the price depends on the price. here we are again turning to europe means the dollar has fallen, why prices do not fall on some goods, we take spare parts a simple topic that they know, so some people on oil filters, who long ago fired the logistics of entrepreneurs through turkey and the united arab emirates wanted to earn 10 times. more. i remember in march. and when you ask. why does he say you know i want to insure risks i transfer risks, i want to earn 5:00-6-10 times more than before. there is not much time left for the global topic, but at least with such an important touch

, let's go through, let's see what else will happen, including from europe, so here's the most interesting thing - this is a week from the global. this is what the sixteenth of october. the 20th congress of the communist party will be held in china very serious expectations political scientists predict the third term of the sidepin earlier let me remind you that this was not the limit for the third term was removed in the eighteenth year. many westerners say that beijing's foreign policy pressure is growing. i will now quote one of the main fears. here is the largest us news site dohill thinks so i quote means, but think china is now aggressive. wait until it 's gone. twentieth party congress. the west should expect sid to seek to conquer taiwan, just as importantly, washington should expect the intensity of militancy after the convention to be higher than before. and that his ambitions will be directed against the us of their allies, the biden administration is likely to not ready for it. that's what the lawyers

are afraid to wait for back. now they are afraid of everything, especially a strong china and a growing china, because a strong china. and this is a united asia, these are colossal mm resources that will obviously not be directed to cooperation with the west. they will be directed to development cooperation with those states that are now trying to drive into isolation, including the russian federation, the republic of belarus and those countries in which, uh, in which, uh, the united states has long stubbornly tried to resist democracy, but nothing came of it, that is strong. they don't need china. we need why the anglo-saxons created auk, yes, the new military-political union is the usa canada great britain australia is just a counterweight. china, after all, mainly in order to, let's say, oppose the influence of the military, including the military-political economic china in this whole, let's say, endo-chinese zone

to this day. in general, we can assume only one thing, that in this situation. they will not change, the leaders are chinese, in general, now it’s literally a question will formulate. do you remember when, probably, unripe landed in taiwan, everyone said, where is that, where is the reaction, why didn’t they shoot down and well, people who understand say that it is in chinese tradition. yes, especially before the 20th congress, wait until the 20th congress, and then there will be an answer for the n- leads of this autumn's political event. if we extract from the war, these are the elections in the usa and the 20th party. eh, here it is necessary to say directly that, of course, there is a certain political struggle in the chinese leadership. name it discussions somehow. otherwise, it is hidden, but this is a chinese tradition. she has always been there, but what the americans have done now for the first time in many years, they tried artificially, putting pressure on china, to intervene in this struggle. and here, for example, visiting entilos. they tried to show what they see, but the leader is allegedly

weak in china, that is, with these provocations to destabilize the situation in e. in china itself, provoke some kind of public discontent a and perhaps even a split in the chinese leadership. so many publications of some inventions somewhere justified various the contradictions that now exist in beijing have probably never been in the west, as they are now for this congress. uh, attention riveted, incredible but really sitimpin. for a long time they wondered what tactics he would choose; he chose the right tactics of no escalation. as it is written from the side of china no, very calmly weighed e he brings the situation to the twentieth congress. he needs to secure his political positions within the chinese leadership. but after that we will see a really defined line, relying on the support of the communist party, he wanted to add that in general, uh, china has never done any escalation in the world,

unlike those who accuse it of just the same anglo-saxons, they constantly tried to escalate around china, uh, both at sea and on land and this does not mean leader. in china , he made some decision on taiwan in order to exacerbate this situation somewhere. this is the first second, most importantly, we must look from the point of view of belarus, it is beneficial for us that china be stable and strong in our interests. i am convinced that after this congress it will become even more stable and even stronger, but i do not expect militant rhetoric from china after this congress is held, china will pursue the same policy and tactics in defense of its national interests, but in chinese it is means calmly thoughtfully and using a proverb. the most terrible weapon is not a rocket. and ivan, so they will slowly move, the best war. the one that was not susie or not on the river bank, wait until the end

as, there may be conclusions. we are in today how to address. he's talking about the main such thesis on security. i offer a small fragment of the meeting. slimb block alexander lukashenko listen right now, we will adequately respond to any opponent. we have been preparing for this for decades. if necessary, we will answer. god forbid, of course, a faithful condition. if you are our intelligence and the military and civilian committee of state security, something will not be missed and will not call, so we must know everything that happens near our borders, without escalating the situation. i want you to understand. if if you want peace, you must always prepare for war all your life, and everything is good. this will be good. therefore, in order to prevent any

collisions and manifestations. we military people must have plans in advance to counter all kinds of scoundrels who are trying to drag us into a fight. we must not let them drag us into war. this is our main task. there should be no war on the territory, belarus everything is clearly this task for the military, but for all of us, this is for the belarusians. here are the tasks. that's what they demand from us, the current situation is easier. you know, i i know the mood of people very well now, because i go through people. it 's okay. people are tense. they see what is happening around the country. here. i want to address them and listened attentively to the meeting with the president. there are two such thoughts that , it seems to me, must be conveyed to every person. first, don't panic. no need to be afraid. here, in order for

everything to be calm in our country, there are two aspects for me. the first unity of the country is truly unity. let's now discard all these disputes, we are belarusians. we have the president. let's unite and be everyone . this is the second aspect to do your own thing at your workplace and not panic. if we are united, i have always been convinced of my country. we can only destroy it ourselves, no one will destroy it, not by sanctions, this has already been convinced, probably everyone knows it there, therefore, they have a bet that someday they will try to destroy it from the inside, now, if we are united, we will do our own business, and the military knows their business and the army. we will support now. hope these conversations are over. remember reduce the army to remove the kgb mvd cut twice. well, what did we have now, if we had reduced it, and remember, this is all a small professional army of a couple of thousand and we don’t need anything more. and that what we now we spoke in a hurry. uh, mobilization would be carried out. no, we have been doing this for 30 years,

so our special services are strong, so put it aside. this is the stupidity of being united and doing this and not panicking. our guys want to sow panic, everyone opens something some destructive telegram channel. panic. mobilization tomorrow. tomorrow is war. no need to panic, the intelligence services have done their job. thank you. you know, i remember, uh, 2010, when we worked out the last option. from national security, we will say so, after all. hmm, they went on about some circles and wrote that we have military threats. no. there is only a source of military threat. here is today. here the head of state said that it was time to move away from these weak, let's say, definitions dofinitions, there is a military threat. and today. i would say that the new version of the national security concept should be more clearly spelled out so that the emphasis on security will sound tougher and recommendations for minimizing the neutralization of these threats.