which operational goods directly reached their consumer, the manufacturer is actively working on establishing logistics today , logistics has become more complicated, but at the same time it has increased, including the volume of one-time deliveries, if we used to supply a hat with a small automobile, perhaps by means of transport with a small tonnage, then today moving on to deliveries. uh, large containers. e, we are forming deliveries, e, deliveries already in the volume of several wagons of several cars about new markets and the promotion of our products were spoken on business briefing. the concern presented its export potential to representatives of the 26th diplomatic mission of the research and production holding of precision engineering. planar is celebrating its 60th anniversary. the staff of the enterprise was congratulated by the president of belarus alexander lukashenko planar is the only one in the country that develops and produces specialized equipment for the production of microelectronics. the holding has implemented a number of

innovative projects that have made it possible to introduce new technologies and expand production capabilities today the company's products are in demand not only in belarus but also abroad, many of its developments have no analogues in the whole world. items of eastern slavic life, samples of ancient weapons and musical instruments, symbols and relics of more than 15,000 students of minsk universities, students of secondary specialized educational institutions of the capital's schools, became spectators and participants of the exhibition project. the slavic world initiative is dedicated to the year of historical memory, its main goal is to draw the attention of the younger generation to the history, culture, traditions and customs of their ancestors, the authors of the project are enthusiasts from the republican association for the promotion of youth, we have good feedback from a grateful public. this project will certainly be scaled already, there are a number of interested universities and in gomel this is

vitebsk and also, well, within the framework of the opening of this exhibition took place. we have a round table and a decision was made. president of the international slavic academy after the exhibition projects in belarus to organize this project in the capital of the russian federation which are represented by these architects belarusian students studying their wonderful paintings and works. we are very grateful to the public organization for the promotion of youth for this wonderful exhibition. we learned a lot of new things for ourselves, took away and wonderful work that we had not seen before and got acquainted with new architects. thanks to this exhibition. we can remember our roots, our stances. where did we even come from interactive here half of the group acted. you could say it was very interesting. everything was included. all the same, there is an exhibition of the slavic world, not the first and not the only project of the youth organization. the association carries out active

work, involving more and more young women in social activities, focuses the attention of young people on the traditional system of values, makes it possible to realize creative ones. essentially today we will talk about alliances, blocs and organizations together with belarus in them. so we spent a busy international week, which alexander lukashenko spent mainly outside of belarus. first of all, it was the central asia but the last summit, which was the

cis summit, is already on the nose of the thirty-first anniversary of the commonwealth of independent states. at one time, this organization was even called the organization of such a cultural divorce of the soviet union. and after that, we now see, well, or a new renaissance and the emergence of a new status of the brilliant secretary of this organization. and the same time. we are talking about the fact that in the space, which includes our country belarus, there are several integration tracks to take the union state, this is probably the closest such integration form, when we are actually one side. well, for example, the russian group. howling a single grouping of troops also helps protect our skies and borders. now, at this time, after the euroses is coming, it includes countries in which, well, conditionally for us citizens. there are customs barriers there, that is, we can come to yerevan, bishkek, astana, and, in principle, we can not think about it. yes, do not think about the boundaries, after that comes. there is the cis, there is also the csto, and there is also the sco. and, in principle, the question arises like this. and

why so many, maybe it will happen some kind of unification, or there is some sense in singing if the meaning in everything that is happening is the realities that are broadcasting to us, e, the post-soviet space and, in general, the collapse of the bipolar world after the ninety-first year. that is, for example, belarus, we were the first to make the initiative of a union state. yes, we held a referendum, and moreover, in 1921 and 22 , the union state passed the maturity exam, and it demonstrated that it is functioning. well let's just see after february 24th. all the agreements that we so wanted to remove barriers to the transition to e, the ruble within the framework of the union state hmm import substitution. we got all this the second point - this, of course, we also have political support, which we saw in

august of the twentieth year, and the president, for example, in astana, said that there is no political support in the cis space, economic, as if there, like absolutely not everywhere, as they say. okay, let's remember the position of one state, which says that it is, as it were, it did not join the sanctions, but it implements sanctions against belarus russia and the eurasian economic union today are faced with the task of passing the exam too. the maturity of water, if only. let's see, kyrgyzstan tajikistan is an armenian question, too, we need to mature to pass exams, but uh at the dkb. even already in some ways, and passed the exam in kazakhstan , for example, maturity. well, the points are also saved in one word, if we look at the post-soviet space of russian-belarusian integration - this is a driver that has already patented itself other formats. they are still running, as

they say, which should all come. union yes , but everything else they have not yet reached any consensus. the most curious format - this is a show why? because the sco, how the organization was formed in general, is purely regional, such as only asian countries could join there. the main questions, in general, were initially this issue of security around afghanistan today due to the fact that belarus, among other things , has joined, well, applied for membership in the sco, firstly, the organization has ceased to be narrow regional second issues that, uh, she has on the agenda. it's not just questions. economics humanitarian sphere science education a whole large layer of questions and the third is the organization really works and has all the prospects to become such a centrifugal instrument of the collective

east as an alternative to the collective. let me then, and then the question arises, and the viability and the need to preserve the cis and the cult. soon we started talking about the summit that took place last week, really. well, there is something to say observations and from the fact that the business trip that was in kazakhstan really, probably, this summit was one of the most acute and substantive in recent times, because, well, heads of state. eh, obviously they had something to say, and this suggests that, yes, rather confirms the fact and the lack of media absence. as such, live broadcasts, then they shared, of course, some. such to you such fragments, what is called for the press, nevertheless. uh, at least from what we heard from the speech of alexander lukashenko the same. yes, uh, there really are a number of issues that, if not resolved, then in principle and, probably, it makes no sense to talk about the

existence of smg further in order. uh-huh even listing you opened our bilateral state program. i am the eu and the cis, in fact, honestly, according to the system, everything was born from the cis and this nature is wrong. this is his happening. sorry, but i told you that politicians journalists in the ninety- first year called this organization of organizations. here is simply a divorce of countries that were part of the soviet and systemically not systemic. not not interesting, really from the point of view. eh, as if a person of a specialist, how is it that i, as a citizen, an ordinary citizen , look and think, there is an alliance, there is a cis dkb , so if you let me say, i will continue everything, correctly. you say, but the point is that the cis emerged not only as a negative. that's how divorce education is negatively those who created it.

whatever they were. i don't like them, but they were wise people, they laid there the development of this organization. this the thesis is the development of the organization, which from itself was able to distinguish it, both at different stages and at times with clear, and not only the matter, of course, in the secretary general, but the development of the organization. at this stage, it required another reflection. i would not be surprised if other organizations appear, they all hypothetically grew out of the cis. let me say that you have not even begun work on this structure. this is more than authority, than competence to increase. the same night soup of judgments, because i myself will probably have to participate in the development of those provisions that are connected with this document. i think that we will be puzzled not by the name of the position of our head in the cis structure, but by the content of the powers that the executive

body will have, which will probably now be called the secretariat. this is probably what they thought about, but i'm not ready to tell you that these are considered countries that were on the tea list of the cis member states . yes, the heads of moldova really have something to do in chisinau this year? and? well, doesn't that mean the fact that after some time, maybe someone else will not be counted, the organization will be reduced, i don’t know to such a union state. we have suggestions and requests. talk to us at the level of observers and now, what you probably heard or didn’t hear about at the end of this last summit, we will begin, in particular, work on the institution of observation and partnership. yes, someone will come, someone will leave, we will work in the status that exists today, because we are open organizations. and in general, not some kind of block there you know on the basics of hard vladimir mikhailovich so you support? yes, that's what observation is. and here, for example, i will ask you

such a question that the cis has become an observer in the dkb. this is generally, as it were, for ordinary people to explain, but it didn’t. tell me again, this is a journalist's speculation. well , we listen and watch what journalists say. alena correctly said that many of the spoken words were behind closed doors . that is why our program is trying to open something, and so it did not become or did not become. at the moment the question is not yet completed in the consideration of countries, its study continues, but the idea, there is such an idea, there is such an idea from your point of view. what is this idea for ? you know, i would like to start clearly with what the cis has been and will be this structure that helped us. i would say to avoid such bloody events that we saw in the example of the collapse of the same yugoslavia in others. e regions. armenians listen to the azerbaijani conflict, the moldovan conflict, the georgian ukrainian conflict. this

is all the cis it seems to me that the principle that was laid down in the cis of ions is functioning here. i am i think you know, yes, this is multispeed integration. well, it would seem to me that the most important thing when we talk about all these regional things is organizations, after all, why are we doing all this, why are we uniting and structuring further? this , of course, is an increase in the standard of living of all the countries included there. well, in fairness, it must be said that in the first place in the cis and in other regional associations. well, the results in this part are modest in the cis for me, both from the point of view. eh, a citizen of belarus, a resident of minsk, the fact that that the capital is located here in minsk and for minsk - this is, in principle, very good. well, it’s like a symbolic step, firstly, because it’s good that we are talking about the fact that you can treat those people who signed

an agreement on cooperation with an independent state in different ways, but this is also symbolic from the point of view, at least a platform for negotiations or statements of one's own opinion. the cis should exist, as it is, for example, now many criticize it in different ways to put it to this organization. they say that she, in principle, does not solve anything. however, he has such a platform where each person can express purely polar points of view, the cis is still turning into such an organization for me as journalists. maybe i'm wrong about something? i would like to return to the summit with the ministry of internal affairs, uh, and emphasize such a rather important point. i think everyone noticed how the uh heads of state followed. uh, which is included in this union for the speech of our president. with what attention? e out of understanding what he says? i note the state in the status we are in the ministry of internal affairs in the status of an observer. yes, v at the same time, the united states is present in the hall, which

is also the united states is also in the observer stage, but uh, no, the word was not presented, not because it was not presented, because there was nothing to say to our president, they listened with an open mouth and absolutely true thesis. e aleksandrovich that if at this time i am political such here are the splits to me, by the way, returning to the theme of the beginning. here the hashtag was perestroika, world perestroika er. i think that the topic of perestroika was not quite correctly formulated for me as a communist. it's actually a red flag because now the formation of the new world is underway. well, the order of the new event and how our president correctly speaks in this political in this political realities. we can unite. i am not positioning the country yet. e, west, e, the center, which is , in fact, belarus, europe, asian countries, including our president, but he said that now is

the time for asia is new. yes, and here there was a very serious hidden hook, wait, only uh, the president of belarus spoke about this, in principle, all those who gathered at this samite. but just the same, they adhered to the theses that now the time has come for asia, otherwise they simply would not have come there, they would have a different position, it is obvious that there is an urgent need, and once the former ones are no longer allowed to communicate on other sites. why alone go to astana, for example, firstly, it is necessary to calmly perceive that the cis is going through different stages, of course, it is not true that peacefully developed in the blood. we have already bathed, and today we see on our borders slowly, but we have come to the point that we have bathed. to unfortunately. ah, but listen, you understand , uh, the collapse of the country is a divorce. and then families at each other, and here imagine 15 families, three immediately ran away and said that they were under occupation. moldova has always been in a situation where romania

has a great influence, azerbaijan and armenia have problems. that is, you understand. each of the republics had mutual claims, so to speak, which, uh, tried not to stick out during the meeting. heads of state, but somewhere in clares in bilateral relations. and you understand when you see some kind of unification and they want to extinguish this, uh, coal, which they are trying to revive. uh, the cooperation of our competitors use the principles of sharing and power there next. here you are voting in some community. if you will be two speakers to speak. here the pension will be, i say it, and we will win our guys without any problems, but petya can make such an option. he will meet with the 15th, uh, the participants of the meeting, he gave one from the third, he will take the fourth, he will threaten. and the voting will be very different from what you see in public policy. it's only uh the finish line, all politics is done under the table, so many problems of the cis are created

under the table of the cleaver, many countries are directly dependent on loans, they are under the strongest pressure, but what is the position of belarus the most sensible, the most reasonable position and the fact that we are the russian federation in our my sister was always told pragmatism and therefore practical benefit for the state. here is russia, and recently we met in smolensk. uh, so, uh with colleagues from russia i say, you must become a centripetal force. what was he talking about rahmon correctly said we want respect, if you want yourself, and respect your beloved wife, who will save you in death throes from cancer . otherwise, she will outlive the boat for you when you choose before. or do you want allies. you must create conditions and be a centripetal force, only the strong ones should surround you. yes, there will be a union. no, and here the russian federation made the mistake of a mistake. it is always more profitable to create favorable conditions than later in the nineties. there were government officials. unfortunately, it cannot be said that a

lot of good things that russia did were also not appreciated. that is, this is a mutual process, therefore, you understand, they played on these grievances, contradictions, that is, all stones cannot be thrown towards russia, but now our task is. what should be decided with you, so there is a real existential threat to the existence of the cis countries, only the economy of the population is destined for certainty and turn off the living labor force. and this territory should be developed and two options, or within the framework. here are the same as here, where a bunch there are even more contradictions than in the cis ten times. the main contradiction between china and russia is the vast uninhabited territory of pakistan and india. to tell you the truth, it will be very difficult to negotiate. but if we manage to build those concepts within the framework of these formations, when we will add to each other, take into account interests and will

not speak from a point of view. these are small nations. these peoples have more than e. well, that's basically it. well, it is necessary to cross oneself and some state of national centripetal forces or constantly and endless military operation. well, it's always expensive, it's always cheaper to create favorable conditions, it's harder to conquer anatoly sergeevich here we are, we have been talking a lot lately discussing the cis csto, in principle, any organizations that, uh, not everything is in order between uh, members, often, there are some conflicts, some support others behind the scenes or publicly, and in general, some oceans are constantly mixed up every time. we raise the question, if a couple of members of the organization, there are among themselves, unresolved issues, then can principle, the organization should continue to exist should everyone adhere to the same opinion or immediately take the side of one of the conflicting parties, and expel the other there, for example, is an excellent question. uh, it

echoes what has already been said. in continuation of the discussion, i will say that, of course, the cis of the 90s differs from the cis of the 2000s, the usual examples from the nineties. who was the general secretary in the nineties and sergei nikolaevich lev e, the current general secretary, this must always be kept in mind, because the secretariat is also included. he often depends on what kind of personnel work there, how they work in terms of your question such as hmm for example, border disputes. disputes about the regulation of borders, disputes about the protection of mountainous areas, various so-called climate agenda in the field of the environment. we often do not understand that there is a territorial dispute behind it, and such disputes will always be here. the answer is simple. if, for example, today we see that in this or that organization. there, the planned exercises are postponed. yes, at the level of such household. we we say, but in this or that state has not adopted a common position. they said, even forgive me to interrupt you, but this teaching is an

indestructible brotherhood and then there are speculations, and that i will answer you, that there was no consensus principle inherent in our organizations. do not be the principle of sovereignty laid down , he inserted a center. poor tendencies, they would be an order of magnitude stronger, that is, the fact that international organizations translate some kind of unsettled agreement, but into the diplomatic channel into the channel of negotiations, when one organization. whether she economically very developed. if it is militarily, it may be less developed, but it can transfer by consensus, for example, the same exercises or periodic settlement of mountainous territories or and so on. this allows the organization to be strengthened in a strategic perspective, that is, the cis here. well, as i say, yes, this organization is most likely about negotiations or some kind. the union is already lying, or yet it remains a union. i perfectly understand that the ninety-second third-fourth year. it

was a feeling of the former motherland and we all said post soviet space space, the cis is now post-soviet space, the cis, even for 17-18 year old people, these names practically mean nothing. on and everyone understands that aha. there are our interests. he explains on his fingers, this is how water is voted. look at the organization - is it profitable or not profitable for you, and, uh, a group of countries, a coalition. for example , the anglo-saxons, who can force you to lead in this way. how do you benefit? well, you know , the vote on the russian operation. who voted the club against those who or could allow yourself or allow yourself or more depending on one of your colleagues, if you remember, yes, on the weekend, here he gave an interview, a text message was quoted from one of his colleagues, who said that simply the third secretary of the us embassy actually dictates how to eat and himself strange

voted. in what way are these participating countries, that is, financing or supplying weapons, or countries that are in complete economic political military dependence, you understand, that is, in general, in principle, if you look on the name of the countries of their budgets debt load. if you see, the amf is such a pocket company of the united states of america, then you can understand what the vote will be, plus or minus four or five states. who kept you? why did they abstain too, if we look at the foreign trade of india, china, pakistan and other countries. they are also very dependent, including on these, so everything is not so bad. you know, rainbows. uh, colors, we can draw everything. unfortunately, it's more difficult. well, that's right, vadim is bad in the face. here we go in a good way. now we must decide to recognize the complexity of the international situation. the fact that the redistribution of the world is taking place, and as they say, some questions in the background introduce the question here, what is the redivision? where in what and

for what? here we say yes, the post-soviet space, what is the very term in soviet terms, it was soviet, something was become post-soviet, that is, such retrograde retrospection does not understand that you know, two are divorced. eh? the wife begins to divide the property there, not as it will not be divided. this is where the military action comes in. yes, question arises in, and where is the image of the future that's all of us. yes, i have a union state of russia belarus for me personally. and here is a good union state of russia, belarus, here is the ussr we understood that we are building communism. yes, that's a bright future there west liberal bourgeois democracy human rights, gays, lesbians and so on, yes, the chinese today they say the community of a common destiny is capitalism for the elect, and capitalism for our allies is conditional. yes, what do we offer? this is the main problem today, so that the cis

ceases to be only with some humanitarian projects, but the memory of the great patriotic war, which, by the way, they are good at. for this, our task is to create an image, i understand i will. and the strategy is precisely jewish yes, it’s understandable to talk about at the top of the superstructural structure of the world here is the understanding that the cis is not only discussions, here at summits, but colleagues should have come, every year we work not only in the humanitarian sphere and not only yes at the mention of memory and even in this summit, if you are the name of the documents, look there are many breakthroughs. last year i told you about a different market that didn't exist. that is, well, this is capitalism in general, that is, where do we go in the word capitalism, clearly, here are the documents. well, thousands wo n’t tell you anything, but ukraine still hasn’t left them, yes. do you always report that they work? even in ukraine today,

many documents are not all far from ukraine, not all are for moldova but this is spectrum western but if they would give me, well, you don’t need to give this time, i told you that the organization is the presence of huge millions of people who cooperate with each other in different directions. every day, every year, every hour , there are plans, there are no plans, and this is developing . this attitude, if not only in the economy, then why did they keep it put an end to it? the union of belarus to russia should become this centrifugal motivating and uniting impetuous force, which in the future will act as a driver of union integration only in our examples. well, the third thing is to say, so we must repeat everything is fine. yes, that is, today we show what a union state is. today russia

well done and belarus well done. we supply each other with quality leverage. the pace so that we hear each other and our viewers also hear our opinion peter, look at what i want to tell all my colleagues, what does the zimmerskaya say? yes, bureaucrats come to the european union, they say, here you will have this, this, this, this, this is our image of the future there. uh, then the americans say, this is this, but we don't. and what are you, here we are talking, here we are performing at us only agreement. this is how we make such beautiful ones, you know from all the speeches of the presidents of the future, all the speeches of our president. i can bring you one word, which, in principle, forms how the present such a future with justice is not for every statehood. the object is not the general secretary,

we have already begun to propose such a humanitarian concept and an effective socio-political model. here both russia and belarus have fixed in the constitutions, adherence to traditional values ​​to traditional faiths respect. this, by the way speaking, it is a very e centripetal force. in what context? i work with a foreign contingent, there are a lot of families from western europe and north america moving to us because they don't want to raise their children in sonya. this is a plus. the only thing is that our socio-political model should be competitive in many ways, and ours is fairer in many ways. it is, so to speak, more in the interests of the person, but in many ways it loses and listen, we will say that we have built a successful model, when it will be our turn. you see, three gay pride parades are ready to be held in the european union, you know, they are ready to send their children at the age of 12. here is this table ripening and allow to install. if only to join it and join nato. that's when we create such a union. therefore, i know with

our russian friends. how many argued in 1 giant leads. these are white growth channels. recently i saw the head of this channel. and how much i say, guys. so when you approach foreign policy with a calculator, you come up with beautiful things, when you said zhirinovsky enough to feed the caucasus who is fighting now? here ossetian was the minister, he is sad ossetian now smolensky, he says, our guys are already the third there, the third line went and there were fathers fighting, and some guys , including the capital borders. whether you understand it or not, they couldn’t have such things, and the same thing could never be said about belarus that we feed someone like that, no one has ever fed belarus. we provided the highest quality geopolitical services. you know in the cis we supplied the highest quality products of the best rural special equipment. and you just have to do it. listen. let's not make these mistakes, because today we have resolved the issues in the south and put things in order. and tomorrow we will again begin to present accounts, we need to be counting when when the situation returns to normal, then no one is immune from

the fact that, in principle, we will return to the old painful issues. and there were no problems because of this. why did we have to download situation on this side? and today we are breaking up themselves to blame for this, well, a word of error. we heard, but do you need to explain it or not? that a bilateral union is a slightly different union, or there is no need to explain that bilateral relations are qualitatively completely different. this is not theory, practice. and now, where is the third one that will come to us. let's search, and we must be an example for the game to eat. here we are today, of course, you understand, we will pass the cis to the allied states a little. we have the sco ahead of us. let's. we now listen to the opinion of nikolai budin a. he, unfortunately, could not come to our studio, but he wished to speak. i'll ask the directors. give him a comment and we will continue our discussion, maybe these platforms. we will flow smoothly into something

new. right now, the shanghai cooperation organization is on a very serious rise, and it is the asian vector that was set. uh, many countries of the world. today it is really developing and we can say that in all likelihood in the near future it is in the eastern direction that it will be the most promising from the point of view of further, so to speak, the development of political e, a component of the world political component, therefore more than 50 fears come, therefore the circle of participants is expanding, therefore the state listens to what it says, but in stages to this, so to speak understanding were organizations. they will continue to work and give a positive result. perhaps over time. they transform into something new, but nothing happens immediately and about this is necessary. including new politicians who want everything at once m-m to read

the classics a little bit to figure it out on their own. well, if they can’t understand, then listen to smart people who can give good advice. mihajlovich you were a consul, right? still, well, how would you have zero years, yes, when, uh, something existed, but, probably, of such a scale and such. uh, well, the scope, she has not yet acquired. at that moment, what was the sco, and what is this organization? suddenly so abruptly? well, what is it called attracted all the other countries worlds that didn't fit me in the first place. well, i'm looking at this emblem. we read shanghai hadzoji. this is the shanghai cooperation organization. uh, really, i was lucky to have worked in china for more than 16 years, of which 10 years in beijing in our embassy, ​​so i remember this time when we started working on

getting into the sco, and so on, somewhere in 2007, and so on. . it was some kind of nonsense for the rest of the participants, like us. in this regional to get and yet already in 2010. we have achieved this, i want to say, not we were just partners and observers. uh, well, this is already a story on its archives can be raised, they do not burn. some of our partners in the cis with central asia slowed down our entry there in e. hmm to the shanghai cooperation organization. i absolutely agree. here u with my colleagues. and the republic of belarus during these almost 12 years here since 2010, year after year, proved to everyone, and first of all, of course, to russia and, of course, the people's republic of china and the central asian countries, that it did not pass the maturity exam. just

see already. we have now become really already becoming members of the shanghai cooperation organization. this is a huge prospect. taking advantage of listening time, we have already taken up the chinese theme. i think on behalf of all our colleagues, we will congratulate everyone who loves, who knows, uh, china of course on the greatest historical date, which has already begun today from sunday in beijing , this is the twentieth congress. communist party. china yes. and this is really a grandiose event. the 90 million party of communists holds such a congress every 5 years. we are not we doubt that real tasks will be determined. uh, real plans and literally think, over the next decade, of course,

china will become the number one power, and he is already practically in terms of. this is not always uh, but nevertheless, returning uh to our topic of the shanghai cooperation organization, i want to say, here we discussed, chickens, what he can give. the hai cooperation organization can give, if we are a member of this organization colleagues, understand what it means to be, so to speak, yes observer. well, for god's sake, you're present. well you look you don't interfere with anything. here is the most striking example i wanted to give you, how successfully our kazakh friends successfully used the sco by then president nazarbayev in 2013, agreeing on the day of singing almost 100 million, so to speak, yes, uh, a project to build such a powerful logistical bridge from kazakhstan to leningrad . this port is the most powerful chinese port. look, kazakhstan is a land power. it

was built with the help of the chinese. uh, in a swindle sniffing your port and now look at all the cargoes of central asia i end up going through kazakhstan there to china from china from this port. uh, kazakh wheat, and so forth goes on to east asia. that's what we need to do. you also had a weekend congress so the communist party of the city sent a congratulations word of greeting to the participants. see for now, but the final meanings. yes, that is, there is, and capitalism is communism in the soviet union. but the communist party of belarus . look at the communist party of china in essence. well, two organizations came out of the same root there with the cpsu yes, well, from the cpsu or vkpb. here, whatever you like, but in fact, here, uh, china has a formed, as a semantic idea of ​​capitalism and socialism, chinese

specifics with chinese specifics. here you are. uh, looking at this experience, some kind of pmt for myself for the belarusian communist party absolutely , but colleagues want to return bye to the previous question, to explain to our viewers and i am very worried that such an impression may arise. people from the inhabitants of belarus that in these geopolitical realities belarus begins to storm, that is, here in all sorts of associations, some kind of integration unions. you understand this is not. and this work absolutely. support your colleague. she was systematic, she made them them, and only thanks to a multi-vector policy, for which at one time they were very much criticized. literally, in the last six months of the year , under the conditions of the most powerful sanctions pressure, we were able to reformat and rebuild the logistics supply chains of belarusian products, and now we are not just climbing, but our economy is showing. eh, so

positive examples talking about cooperation and interaction between the cpb. and kppk. i want to say that together with the communist party of the russian federation, the cpc is our main partner. we are constantly checking our watches. and we have similar positions on the vision of building a strategy for the future, but here again, returning to the issue of the future. you know the strategies of the future, today we must stand today in order to build this future, but in order to expose, how to say our president correctly. how many together will only be reported, and china and asia today is not just not new, but the center of the strongola. they have always been the center of power in what today needs to be thought about today. and if we think today today, then we are the strategy in belarus of belarus but of today, because tomorrow may not come. first for this reason. wait, vadim, we are present at

different sites and the heads of the state travel. these time zones are changing and this crazy rhythm can withstand it just so that when this geopolitical transformation happens, belarus takes its place and i just occupied, but took my place, because many people argue why membership is there, firstly, i’ll tell you separately. listen from coal and began to deal with the european union. such an organization has grown. and already there it was soon likely to disintegrate. if the wrong ones are obeyed, you understand, but the question is different, by the way, yes, on the threshold, the americans are now solving all their issues and china is weakening both russia and the european union, and this, and now it’s time for organization. first. uh, it means absolutely practical. benefit because you are participating in a specific venue. provide your questions in the economic plane. that is, you agree on security issues, and you don’t stay on the sidelines, you understand, right? that is, you, uh, participate in global processes? that

is, right now there is a global redistribution of the world, it’s right that we should be members of these organizations in order to influence the processes and not to become yes, she is behind the courts and they also failed with their isolation sanctions, where is putin where lukashenka is isolated, dozens of leaders come to the forums meet on highest level. the population is most of the world, in any case, the leading leaders of the world. therefore, these organizations allow us to be full-fledged subjects of international law, influencing global processes in the world , and you rightly said they listen to our leaders and vladimir vladimirovich and alexander grigoryevich with an open mouth. here is this union state. anatoly sergeevich vyrok somehow got bored in our discussion. i listen very carefully. please share your thoughts. maybe i'll push you. but just the same, when we talk about the fact that belarus is now trying to beat him, or perhaps his place under the sun, it is obvious that this will be the eastern direction. here

which of the organizations do you think is paramount for our work on what to focus on? i think that taking into account the fact that today, as already mentioned , the most promising organization is moving to asia. still, the cis remains that south of the cis, which allows e-e to settle an agreement there within the framework of a free trade zone. e of central asia it allows the cis to cooperate to build e a link between integration associations in the cis and asian integration associations, for example, the same osian, for example, the same highway, but this is more about separatism. it's more of a political area. that is, today there is no such format in the world that we would say there is a bipolar world. yes, the soviet union, for example, was against such a wording. polar world was a non-alignment movement that worked for a multi-polar world that basically the united nations was moving toward, uh, 10 years ago. let's remember

what happened when china began to rise. analysts and scientists had all the questions. will the world become bipolar again , will the united states and china come to an agreement and then what will happen to the medium and small ones, and i will say even further from the states that have one diplomat sitting there in new york. i am with the americans, who have 500 diplomats or there are more sitting there, therefore answering your questions. i will say that this is the cis, yes the vector is shifting to the south and belarus, uh, must understand what it understands, in principle, this can be seen from those the positions it puts forward. uh, our our decision makers. uh, belarus should occupy a central place in these networks. yes, sometimes this transport. we see that kazakhstan is now coming forward under transport. it 's okay, belarus, for example, as you said about merit, belarus is traditionally one of such main e main outposts

there, well, outpost buffer. many different western language, but our drug prevention initiatives prevent human trafficking. here we take, for example, central position. yes, what the politicians are talking about, but what are the international work services talking about. just here in support of the previous thesis. yes, maybe such an acute problem, but i will translate into everyday language. yes , when they can come to you, uh, god forbid, but come home with a pistol that is not registered anywhere. yes, this discussion begins that they won’t come to you with a gun, just the same at the national level and further at the international multilateral level, because the problem of arms trafficking trafficking in human beings and e, and drugs are three such whales, as they are often called the world economy , it is almost impossible to solve them alone. therefore, belarus takes, er, central positions on certain issues and on other positions, belarus is working to gradually come out together with the countries of

central central asia - this is very important. we often forget about them, because we are, as it were, in the center of europe yes, we have the european union of the russian federation nearby, it is convenient for our business to trade, but central asia can be specified for understanding. yes, as you said for the layman. look, we are talking about the fact that the cis is to some extent an outdated organization somewhere. we say, i don't think so. many say, but you say that the cis is really for many, especially specialists. priority organization according to one principle in 31 years to work on the number of key documents that are already working and it’s impossible to just take it and turn it off and it turns out that this is different hmm stepwise integration. basically, it should just exist. well, i tell you the truth, these are not journalists, ordinary parents from science. from science, it lies in the fact that any multilateral agreement is always based on a network or system of bilateral agreements. the same is the same

, the wto is the same general trade agreement, they all grew out of the system of bilateral treaties. today, this system needs to be raised to a multilateral level and further disseminated with our colleagues. and this experience in every possible way i declare and rehabilitate. e. well, i would like to add a certain role, belarus here. let's remember how we were poisoned with fairy tales that belarus is important for china only as a transit country. yeah, we see how the restructuring of belarusian-chinese relations is going. we have now reached the highest level of partnership. this is an all-weather partnership after, by the way, how they officially applied for membership in the sco. this should also be borne in mind, but for china we are becoming. they are the same project. look who's around us, right? lithuania, which is on the list and which travels to taiwan and develops anti-chinese separatism the west, which stands next to us, we

become a showcase for china for russia, we are a geostrategic direction of protecting moscow, that is, we are strategically important. if you want , we are for eurasia, this is germany for the west, then we become the cold war. if we endure , we will join this system, we will get what we wanted, we can add a little. yes. uh, once again i want to confirm this thesis that belarus has passed the maturity exam, maybe for hmm our tv viewers and with everyone this fact is known, but uh, today it is already on hearing. yes, and not one year the economic belt of the silk road. and yes, and the bow belt and the way, so , i want to say that somewhere in the weather, when the president of the people's republic of china announced the start of this grandiose program of a grandiose project, after all, china did not have a final

decision. how to start this route from china further through e, russia or kazakhstan and further, then either through belarus or through the baltic states or through ukraine, and literally in 2015, china made the final decision to let the entire flow go and did not fail it is through belarus and it is not necessary to say that we will say so again we passed the exam for maturity, because by this time we have. well , first of all, we absolutely ensured that percentage of political stability, which is for business. this is very important next. i wanted to say, look how we modernized the belarusian railways by purchasing new equipment, wagons, and so on and so forth. and now we, well, what do you say, this is logistics, this is more trying to head for china now , yes, yes, unlike the baltic states, the poles here this anti-chinese course is not carried out, on the contrary, they came many times in the 10s and

spoke. well, so, let's go, there 's a continuation of the pig's mouth. why then completely? look at the olympic games. uh, in beijing, we see that there are no stats there. we see no germany. and duda is there. yes, but they do not know what china means, we must understand that we should not set our goals for china to be a transit country. we are our goal to join the technological production industrial chains and the belarusian-chinese industrial park for this is what electrocapacitors are created for medical various things that we produce together there masvich engines. if he says so, yes it is, but import substitution and b we become needed, china and china is needed. moreover, we are also needed by russia in import substitution, thereby conjugating everything eurasian that this is a

guarantee that god forbid that we have such a rebellion as in the twentieth year, because the main the goal was that the deindustrialization of belarus in order to completely clear this country of production and fill with western goods. with such a partner as china, it will be extremely difficult to do this. yes, and unlike the european union we will survive, but the european union today is facing the issue of industrialization. why is it that the americans want to take their industry and bring it to themselves in the fight against china we are talking about another organization. we didn't talk like that today. if we touched on this in passing, let's talk about security. that's probably where the questions are. eh, a lot has accumulated lately and kohl we see now development of the situation. we understand that belarus and russia understand that our relations are beyond the brackets. in all spheres, there they are absolutely on a different level, but we are starting a union state, of course, the military sphere. naturally, we understand that, well, we are protected by, uh, our ally. we go hand in

hand with each other there and in any case, we will fight back together, the question arises. why do we need the rest, if everything is so incomprehensible in the relationship, between everything is so ambiguous, uh, maybe, just the same here on the dkb. it's time to put point. well, this is generally the wrong approach. uh, first of all, i explain a little bit i disagree. unfortunately, our president said incorrectly that the organization has weakened, it is necessary to strengthen the economic and political component there, but plus the cis is that of this organization. in principle, both the economic union and the union state and the csto expressed themselves as crosses. therefore, this is the soil , you understand, this is the fertile soil that gives birth, so the offset is possible. well, although here is the economic court of the cis what is it, maybe you need to read the documents, you understand, you need to read the documents the economic court of the cis has grown an economic nuclear power plant that works yes, yes, but i’m just

saying that vitya’s fertile mail is still growing, but if we take documents with you, then the powers of the cis bodies, unfortunately, are not the ones to help regarding the csto. you see, the main problem is contradictions, but i will explain to you why you are fighting? what do you think, for the territory here you think there is little territory, the farther from you, the farther from you located. uh, military formations battle heads, how the caribbean crisis began in the world placed missiles all there remember, there is the caribbean sea, from there the turks started, and we went there closer to the caribbean islands now berlin moscow is a treaty we will not go down in history. you understand that today, when we talk about global security, the further we have a security belt. we would have more allies in this region. kazakhstan would be with kazakhstan if then, unfortunately, individual politicians are not always appreciated. i’m not talking about my president of kazakhstan now. i’m

talking about the political establishment, which today speaks impartially about russia but she then played a decisive decisive licensing of the british takes the project. yes, especially energy ones, and therefore they express it, but this is wrong, therefore it really played its role about dkb. and by the way, they defended it. it’s not easy, kazakhstan, after all, they wanted to set central asia on fire central asia, it became kazakhstan’s regiment in the larger economy of all central asian countries, you understand, if this country were approached, that is, you need to understand these processes, therefore, any expansion of some kind of geopolitical union of education or a military bloc is a, which means the distance of the threat from their own guns. therefore, we will deal with this. another question plays on a contradiction. you understand, including today, what is ours. weakness they control the international financial system trading international arms trade in many ways control control international institutions that can impose sanctions understand, have you ever seen that you

against the united states, someone waged sanctions any war unleashed. why spit vote ain't voted and we led san da russia has imposed sanctions, but your sanctions are a mosquito bite to a certain extent. unfortunately, but see the hair, showed the european union today that they depend, including this equipment. the only problem. i want to say that today everyone understands everything that they are doing. russian federation at the moment, this is the plan of the united states of america. they did not want to weaken europe , weaken russia, destroy the slavs as much as possible. professionally and while you and i are not able to strike, but think about a blow, or a threat to strike, as well as in geopolitical terms and fate. i'm in the campaign in the uk in washington and london, they will tilt us, and while we play second fiddle, you understand, if you tilt, yes, but they limited

trade. today you are forced to sell potash fertilizers cheaper than carriers, we are losing markets. and it’s true that one president told us about this and that in some situations countries do not support each other, and i still understand, yes, if we have an organization and an organization of the cis - this is the union of equal partners, right, but sovereign, but sovereign, but equal, i emphasized equal that , in principle, i understand that the problems of each can be the problems of another . but after all, it doesn’t always work out, and so it does with jacob. relatively speaking, we started with the fact that the cis will become an observer on the cst. and for what? hmm, nothing, the discussion continues with us, please, here are the details, ask here ku. the question is the level of real threats. for them themselves and for their peoples. see what's what. come on, it's an organization. let me

make a deal. uh-huh that's when this block will become , uh, really strong and able to respond to nato. the main problem is the point of turbulence, which the us has in its policies and methods. they are proxies of conflicts around russia, china, new ones will be created and somewhere it will be drawn in, and so, while we all mean the leaders of the countries that are members of the csto and, first of all, the cis countries, the leaders here are only their power. uh, so to speak, let's say strong-willed a political decision will not be able to unite in such a bloc that can really counter the challenged threats until we are in the bars. well, look, this needs to be eaten by the president. january of this year showed that, in principle, countries can unite in the face of adversity absolutely calmly in kazakhstan, they calmed down. no matter how we are not politicians, and we do not know. how did this happen, but in any case, the troops were brought in and

the situation calmed down, but the situation is now on the kyrgyz-tajik border, the situation is armenia shows azerbaijan that the csto may not be so much dialectic of contradictions over national and narrowly national. yes, here is the tajik kyrgyz border. what is the problem? are there any scattered villages? yes, why change territories water? just a struggle for water, these have water, these do not have water. turn off the water and that's it, but the main problems. what is the organization, has not yet become a tool for solving this issue. and why, because again returning to my thesis, there is no image of the future. and what can to be an image of the future, american geopolitics at the beginning of the 20th century fully said that the natural eurasian borders were the unification of all of eurasia into a natural e, a geopolitical bloc with the solution of internal

economic political security, it turns out the borders of the russian empire at the beginning of the seventeenth year, brest, which is desired aloud, we say the cis there brothers, let's face this issue, of course. you know that we have this issue, actually registered. how to solve it when ask yourself a question like a smart person. and what is up to now so far this has not been resolved, so the way, and russia, finding an opportunity, enters. that, the warring countries call for it, and in this case, you also know, tajikistan, kyrgyzstan, and the existing peacekeeping mechanism does not start, because they don’t even want to sign it. but still. let's not fantasize about launching the mechanism of countries that have not shown their interest to the end. in this launch, the silent mechanism does everything, therefore, we use it to a new state. why , when this new state, as you say, the attraction is there. yes i do to say this about the military attractiveness of the economic will not happen. then we will become

generally all in common. well, it looks like in some new single format, in my opinion, we want to say to our discussion that, probably, we should not have illusions and say that a is the case for all participating countries. no matter what kind of association there should be a common goal, everyone must live there soul in soul and understand each other, everyone looks after their own interests. well, however, as in life, but most importantly, now to understand that sometimes. protecting your own interests it is impossible without common protection. well , belarus should appear in any organization that will somehow relate to peace in our country, and the more active we are there , the more we will really live in peace. this is

a panorama of the live broadcast of the main events, thursday, october 20, i will tell you sergey lugovsky hello from big politics to the urgent, the meeting of independence today spoke on the topical issues of our life , the president once again emphasized the system.