well, practice, that is, tournament so that people do not lose their skills, and young people can gain some experience. naturally, decisions were made to fill our national e, the calendars of our national championships with the maximum number of competitions with the involvement of the russian side. we invite them to our open our guys participate in russian competitions. well, the apogee is already these complex competitions in several sports, so we believe that this document carries a certain contribution to the fact that our guys will be able to continue to prepare, that is, video, perhaps now in competitions of a fairly high international level. they will be able to improve their sportsmanship. and i think that they will adequately represent our country in the future and morally support the two guys. absolutely right. because, well, i guess if i think everyone witnessed that, uh, what a really moral thing, there must have been such a blow to the non. for the guys for the athletes

, that's why it was really very difficult to survive all this, but seeing, so to speak, support for the state and, first of all, and public organizations. here, let's say, uh, in the continuation of the educational and sports process of the educational and training process of preparation, a number of documents were adopted regarding the material support of the children of the athletes. that is, right now, this should literally be given to the head of state for signature. decree 190, well edited. there will be a new edition of this decree. say, our open championships and our russian cups are written everywhere, and here just the summer winter games of the paralympians, according to the results of which the guys will also be presented to the state, perhaps awards and their countless titles to material finding. this is not our last time. that is why our signed agreement naturally contributed. then the state authorities

also treat this with understanding and do everything to ensure that our children feel like full-fledged members of our society in order to support the physical spirit of the children. we have enough in our country facilities where athletes with disabilities can train and whether they are evenly distributed throughout the country, or anyway, all roads still lead to the capital, in our opinion, of course, there are enough facilities. here are all the recently built sports facilities. they meet the highest international standards. regarding the provision of a barrier-free environment, that is, access for people with disabilities to physical education and sports, these facilities. here is minsk , of course. this last time built, minsk arena and let's say there is a cycling stadium, our national olympic stadium dinamo but if the beautiful bush is full and the pool there is a palace for water sports. the legal arena is a hockey stadium

and this is the canal our mushroom is there on the shore of the mujas. eh, good now, recently several objects have been built in gomel here. uh, in the regional centers, indeed, the infrastructure has been created in the district. of course, we are a little behind. you have to use all the facilities that have been built yet in the days of the soviet union, this is the 70-80s of construction, of course, at that time there were no regulatory documents for non-stationers, which, according to which it was necessary to ensure a barrier-free appearance, therefore we experience certain difficulties there, therefore we are already trying to create and decisions are being made in order to so that for further promotion and development of sports, it is already being created on the ground, for example, we have a good example in gomel created. it is called the gomel regional center of the olympic sole of the olympic paralympic training. here. with the help or with the support of the

regional committee of the gomel executive committee , this center was created and is functioning, but now they have the opportunity to gather compactly from all over the region, but also to provide already comprehensive, so to speak, training in several sports, we hope that over time such centers will develop and in other regional centers of bobruisk, we also have swimming facilities there, and the local authorities support and the regional committee supports us in swimming, a very good course has been created also did not think that we have a person in the district center. well, too, let's say such a middle-aged very such an active person coaches. rodion tits. he gathered around him more than twenty athletes there, and indeed now there is a gradual influx, let's say. we have, uh, a reserve national team or from belarus, let's say from brest a lot therefore. we will decide. i think, joint efforts together with the support of the state. i think new facilities will be built. and we still hope that in the near future we

we get the property object which will be valid only for paralympic athletes. thank you very much, and be sure to convey to the guys the wishes to show to the maximum everything they are capable of. thank you. thanks for the questions. the program was answered by nikolai shudeiko , secretary general of the paralympic committee of belarus, the results and analysis of the main events of this week in the atn informational analytical program. main broadcast. all projects of our tv channel are available on the website www.birus24.by, as well as in social networks. i'm sorry to you. all the best. enriching your erudition is not so difficult. for starters, you can refresh the school curriculum. i

know lev nikolai nikolaevich, then again i saw long hair and a beard, and at the end they began to consider him a little moved at the end of his life. yes, but they began to consider it a little moved. i remember this for sure, then try my luck in a team game and ask for time, but we are already ready. and you're ready so, but if your answer is wrong, you'll go and set the stone perfectly, we understand. so this is the abduction of europe and the main thing to remember is that the brain can in what year were the modern pentathlon competitions included in the olympics program? watch the intellectual show on belarus 24 tv channel. for a moment you want to stop running and see

how it rains. the leaves are moving, the sun is shining. and how our life is built from all these little things, i want to look at this world differently. and every day to discover something new and it's so interesting for us, because we do it with love. with love from belarus , the weekly socio-political talk show basically. today we will talk about alliances, blocs and organizations together with belarus in them. so we spent

a busy international week, which alexander lukashenko spent mainly outside of belarus. first of all, it was central asia, but the last summit, which was the cis summit, is already on the nose of the 31st anniversary of the commonwealth of independent states. at one time, this organization was even called the organization of such a cultural divorce of the soviet union. and after that, we now see, well, or a new renaissance and the emergence of the new status of the ingenious secretary of this organization is the same time. we are talking about the fact that in the space that our country belarus is a part of, there are several integration tracks to take the union state, this is probably the closest such integration form, when we are actually one side. well, for example, the russian group. howl, a single grouping of troops also helps to protect our skies and borders now at this time. after the euro-zest comes, it includes countries in which, well,

conditionally for us there are no customs citizens there customs barriers. that is, we can come to yerevan, bishkek, and astana, and, in principle, we don’t have to think about it. yes, do not think about the boundaries, after that comes. there is the cis, there is also the csto, there is also the shock, and in principle, the question arises like this. and why is there so much, maybe there will be some kind of unification, or is there any sense in singing, if the meaning in everything that is happening is the realities that broadcast us, e, the post-soviet space and, in general, the collapse of the bipolar world after the ninety- first of the year. that is, for example, belarus we the first made the initiative of the union state. yes, we held a referendum, and moreover, in the twenty- first twenty-second years, the union state passed the maturity test, and it demonstrated that it is functioning? well , let's just after the twenty-fourth of february all the agreements that we so wanted

to remove barriers to the transition to e-e ruble within the framework of the union state import substitution. we got all this the second point is, of course, we also have political support that we we saw in august 2020, and the president, for example, in astana, said that there is no economic support in the cis space, as it were, they seem to be decided not everywhere, as they say. well, let's remember the position of one state, which says that it does not seem to join the sanctions, but it implements sanctions against belarus , russia and the eurasian economic union today, the task is also to pass the exam. the maturity of water, if only. let's see, kyrgyzstan tajikistan is an armenian question too we need the maturity to pass the exams, but uh dkb. even already in something and well, an exam in kazakhstan, for example, for maturity. well, even

the points are saved in one word, if we look at the post-soviet space of russian-belarusian integration - this is a driver that, uh, patented itself already in other formats. they are still running, as they say, which should all come. union yes , but everything else they have not yet reached any consensus. the most curious format is the show. why because the sco, how the organization was formed in general purely regional, such as only asian countries could enter there. the main questions, in general, originally were of this question. security around afghanistan today is due to the fact that belarus, among other things , has joined, well, applied for membership in the sco, firstly, the organization has ceased to be a narrow regional organization; secondly, the issues that it has on the agenda are not only

security issues, the economy, the humanitarian sphere science education is a whole large layer of questions and the third is the organization really works and has all the prospects. become so centrifugal tool of the collective east, alternatives to the collective government then, and then the question arises, but the viability and the need to preserve the cis and the cult. soon we started talking about the summit that took place last week, really. well, there is something to say about such observations and from the fact that the business trip that was in kazakhstan really, probably, this summit was one of the most acute and substantive in recent times, because, well, heads of state. uh, clearly they had something to say, and that means yes. rather confirms the fact and the absence of the media, the absence, as such, of broadcasting. my then already shared, of course, some such

fragments, what is called for the press, however. uh, at least from what we heard from the speech of alexander lukashenko the same. yes, uh, there really are a number of issues that, if not resolved, then in principle and, probably, it makes no sense to talk about the existence of smg further in order. uh-huh, even the transfers with which you opened our program the bilateral state and the eu and the cis actually, honestly, according to systemically wrong. everything was born from the cis and this is the nature of its happening. sorry, but i told you that politicians journalists in the ninety-first year called this organization of organizations. here is simply a divorce of countries that were part of the soviet and systemically not systemically. not not interesting, really from the point of view. eh, as if a person is a specialist, as i, as a citizen, an ordinary citizen look and think, there is a union. there is the cis , there is the csto, so for me, if you let me

speak, i will continue everything, correctly. you say, but the point is that the cis emerged not only as a negative. that's how divorce education is negatively those who created it. whatever they were. i like them, but they were wise people, they laid there, the development of this organization. this thesis is the development of organizations, which the dkb was able to distinguish from itself and at different stages of the eurasian economic community and not only business. naturally in the secretary general, but the development of the organization. at this stage , it required another reflection. and i won't be surprised if there are other organizations they all grew up from the cis hypothetically. let me say that we have not even begun work on this structure is no different than complete. what is the competence to increase my value judgment, because i myself

will probably have to participate in the development of those provisions that are associated with this document. i think that we will be puzzled not by the name of the position of our head in the cis structure, but by the content of the powers that the executive body will have, which will probably now be called the secretariat. this is what they probably thought but i will not be ready to say that we do not read the countries that were, you know , the list of cis member countries, there was no speech about ukraine. uh, moldova yes, the leaders of moldova really have something to do in chisinau this year? and? well, doesn't this mean that after some time, maybe someone else will not be counted, the organization will be reduced. do not know up to such a union we have a proposal of a request. to talk at the level of observers with us and now here's what you probably heard or didn't hear as a result of this at the last summit, in particular, we will begin work on the institution of observation and partnership. yes, someone will come, someone will

leave, we will work in the status that exists today, because we are open organizations. and in general, you know not some kind of block there on the basic hard ones vladimir mikhailovich do you support it? yes, that's what observation is. and here, for example, i will ask you such a question that the cis has become an observer in the dkb. it's like for an ordinary person. explain it did not become. tell me again it's a journalist conjecture. well, we listen and watch what journalists say. alyona correctly said that many of these agreements were behind closed doors. that is why our program, we are trying to open something up. so it didn’t, or it didn’t. at the moment, the issue has not yet been completed in the consideration of countries , it is still being studied, but the idea, there is such an idea, there is such an idea from your point of view. what is this idea for? you know, i would like to see an inscription saying that the cis was and will be this structure that helped us. i

would say avoid these bloody events that we saw in the example of the collapse of the same yugoslavia in others. e regions. listen to armenians azerbaijani conflict, moldovan conflict, georgian ukrainian conflict. it's all the cis it seems to me here the principle that was laid down in the cis and it is functioning. i think you know, yes, this is integration at different speeds, but it would seem to me that the most important thing when we talk about all these regional things is organizations, after all, why are we doing all this, why are we uniting and structuring further? of course, this is an improvement in the standard of living. of all the countries included there, well, in fairness , it must be said that in the first place in the cis and in other regional associations. well, the results in this part are modest, but in the cis, for me, as from the point

of view of a citizen of belarus, a resident of minsk , the fact that the capital is located here in minsk is very important, and for minsk - this, in principle, is very important. well, it’s like a symbolic step, firstly, because we are talking about it well, that you can treat those people who signed an agreement on cooperation with an independent state in different ways, but this is also symbolic from the point of view, at least a platform for negotiations or for expressing one's own opinion. the cis should exist, as it is, for example, now many criticize it in different ways to put it to this organization. they say that she, in principle, does not solve anything. however, it has such a platform where each person can express purely polar points of view while the cis is turning for me as such an organization as journalists. maybe i'm wrong about something? i'd like to go back to myself, that is, mia uh and emphasize such an important point. i think everyone noticed how uh the heads of state followed. e, which is included in this

union for the speech of our president. with what attention? e out of understanding what he says? i note the state in the status we are in the ministry of internal affairs in the status of an observer. yes, at the same time, the united states is present in the hall, which is also the united states is also in the observer stage, but, uh, the word was not presented, not because it was not presented, because there was nothing to say to our president, they listened open-mouthed and absolutely true thesis. e aleksandrovich that if at this time i am political such splits to me, by the way, returning to the topic and began. here the hashtag was perestroika, world perestroika er. i think that the topic of perestroika was not quite correctly formulated for me as a communist. this is generally the red flag of glebak, because now the formation of the new world is underway. well, the order of the new event and how our president correctly says in this

political in this political reality. we can unite. we i don't position now countries. uh, the west, uh, the center, which is essentially belarus, europe, asian countries, including our president, but he said that now is the time for asia is new. yes, and there was a very serious hitch. wait. i understand that the president of belarus spoke about this, in principle, to all those who gathered at this summit. but they just adhered to the theses that now the time has come for asia, otherwise they simply wouldn’t have come there, they have a different position, it’s obvious that there is an urgent need, but to communicate on other platforms times the former no longer give. why alone go to astana, for example, firstly, it is necessary to calmly perceive that the cis is going through different stages, of course, it is not true that peacefully developed in the blood. we have already bathed, and today we see it slowly on our borders, but we have come to the conclusion that we have redeemed, unfortunately, ah, but listen, you understand, uh, the collapse

of the country is a divorce. and then families at each other, and here imagine 15 families, three immediately ran away and said that they were under occupation. moldova has always been in a situation where a large romanian influence exerts, armenia azerbaijani and problems. that is, you understand. each of the republics had mutual claims, so to speak, which, uh, tried not to stick out during the meeting. heads of state, but somewhere in clares in bilateral relations. and you understand when they see some kind of unification and want to put out this, uh, coal, which they are trying to revive. uh, the cooperation of our competitors use the principles of sharing and power there. yes, you are voting in some community. if you will be two speakers protrude. here the pension will be, i say it, and we and our guys will win. no problem, but a pension can make that an option. he will meet with the 15th, uh, the participants of the meeting , he gave one from the third, he will take the fourth, he will

threaten. and the voting will be very different from what you see in public policy. it's just, uh, the finish line, all politics is done under the table, so many cis problems are created under the caluary table. many countries are directly dependent on loans, they are under the strongest pressure, but what is the position of belarus the most a sound, most reasonable position and the fact that we have always said pragmatism in our sister to the russian federation, which means practical benefit for the state. here is russia, and recently we met in smolensk. uh, so, uh with colleagues from russia i say, you must become a centripetal force. what rahmon was talking about is correct, we want respect, if you want yourself, and i respect her beloved wife who will save you from death cramps from cancer. otherwise, she will outlive the boat for you when you choose before. if you want allies, you must create conditions and be a centripetal force, only the strong ones should

surround you. yes, there will be a union. no, and here the russian federation made mistakes. it is always more profitable to create favorable conditions than later in the nineties. there were government, unfortunately, not russian. i also want to tell you that a lot. well, what he did was good. russia was also not valued. that is, this is a mutual process, so you understand, they played on these contradictory grievances, that is, all stones aside you can't leave russia, but now our task is. what do you need to decide. so there is a real existential threat to the existence of the cis countries below the economy of the population, they are destined to express and turn off certain living labor. and this territory should be developed and two options, or within the framework. here are the same as here, where a bunch of contradictions are even greater than in the cis ten times. the main contradiction between china and russia is the vast uninhabited territory of pakistan and india

. to tell you the truth, and very it will be difficult to negotiate. but if we manage to build those concepts within the framework of these formations, when we will add to each other, take into account interests and will not speak from a point of view. these are small nations. these peoples have more than e. well, that's basically it. well, it is necessary to transcend itself and some state of the national centripetal forces or constantly and endless military operation. well, it's always expensive, it's always cheaper to create favorable conditions, it's harder to win anatoly sergeevich here we are, we've been talking a lot lately while discussing the cis csto, in principle, any organizations that not everything is in order between, the members, often, there are some conflicts, some support others behind the scenes or publicly, and in general the oceans are constantly mixed up every time . we raise the question, if a couple of participants in the organization

have unresolved issues among themselves, then can the organization, in principle, continue to exist ? should everyone adhere to the same opinion or immediately take the side of one of the conflicting parties to the second one? like a great question? uh, it echoes what has already been said. in continuation of the discussion, i will say that, of course, the cis of the 90s differs from the cis of the 2000s, the usual examples from the nineties. who was the general secretary in the nineteenth years and sergey nikolaevich lev e, the current general secretary, this must always be kept in mind, because the secretariat is also included. it often depends on what personnel work there, how they work in terms of your issue such as hmm, for example, border disputes. regulatory controversy border disputes about protection, e mountainous areas, various so-called climate agenda in the field of the environment. we often do not understand that there is a territorial dispute behind it, and such disputes will

always be here. the answer is simple. if, for example, today we see that in this or that organization. there, the planned exercises are postponed. yes, at the level of such household. we say, but in this or that state has not adopted a common position. well, even excuse me, i will interrupt you, but the teaching is an indestructible brotherhood and immediately speculation, yes, oh that i will answer you that if there were no principle of consensus embedded in our organizations. do not be the principle of sovereignty laid down , he inserted a center. poor tendencies, they would be an order of magnitude stronger, that is, the fact that international organizations translate some kind of unsettled agreement, but into the diplomatic channel into the channel of negotiations, when one organization. whether it is economically very strongly developed. if it is militarily, it may be less developed, but it can transfer by consensus, for example, those same exercises or periodical settlement of mountain areas or so

on. this allows the organization 's strategic perspective to be strengthened, that is, the cis here, well, as i say, yes, this organization is most likely about negotiations or some. the union is already lying, or yet it remains a union. i perfectly understand that in the ninety-second third-fourth year. it was a feeling of the former motherland and we all said the post-soviet space, the cis is now post-soviet, the space, the cis even for seventeen eighteen-year-old people, these names mean almost nothing. on and everyone understands that aha. there are our interests. he explains on his fingers, that's how they vote. well, look at the organization - is it beneficial or disadvantageous for you, and, uh, a group of countries, a coalition. for example, the anglo-saxons, who can force you to lead in this way. how do you benefit? well, you know, the vote on the russian operation. who voted the club against those who or could afford or afford or more depending on

one of their colleagues, if you remember yes on the weekend, here he gave an interview, quoting a text message from one of his colleagues, who said that it was just that the third secretary of the us embassy actually dictated how to eat and voted themselves strange. in some way, these are participating countries, that is, those that finance or supply weapons , or countries that are in complete economic political military dependence, you understand, that is, in general, in principle, if you look at the names of countries, their budgets are indebtedness. vyev, amvf is such a pocket company of the united states america, you can understand what the vote will be plus or minus four or five states. who kept you? why did they abstain too, if we look at the foreign trade of india, china, pakistan and other countries. they are also very dependent, including on these, so everything is not so bad. you know , rainbows. eh, tones, we can draw everything. unfortunately, everything is more complicated, but rightly vadim is

bad in the face. here we go in a good way. now we must decide to recognize the complexity of the international situation. the fact that the world is being redistributed, and as they say, some questions in the background introduce the question here what is the redistribution? where in what and for what? here we say yes, the post-soviet space, what is the very term in soviet terms, it was soviet, something was become post-soviet, that is, such retrograde retrospectively they no longer understand that you know, two are divorced. eh? the wife begins to divide the property there, not as it will not be divided. this is where the military action comes in. yes, the question arises, and where is the image of the future that's all of us. yes, i am a union state of russia belarus for me personally. and here is a good union state of russia, belarus, here is the ussr we understood that we are building communism. yes, that's a bright future there west liberal bourgeois

democracy human rights, gays, lesbians and so on, yes, the chinese today they say the community of common destiny is capitalism for the elect, and capitalism for our allies. well, conditionally yes, but what do we offer? this is the main problem today, so that the cis ceases to be. here is a draw point and not uh, it was associated only with some kind of humanitarian projects, but in memory of the great patriotic war, which, by the way, they are good at. for this, our task is to create an image, i understand i will. everything and strategies are precisely eurasian yes, integration is understandable talking about at the top of the superstructural structure of the world here is the understanding that the cis is not only discussions, but at summits, but colleagues should have come, every year we work not only in the humanitarian sphere and not only yes mention of memory and even in this summit, if you are the name of the papers, look there are a lot of breakthrough. i am in the past year told you, and another market that

did not exist. that is, well, this is capitalism, in general, that is, where we are going capitalism is the word, it's clear, but here are the documents. well, thousands of this will not tell you anything in ukraine, it has not yet come out of them, yes. do you always report that they work? even in ukraine today, many documents are not all far from ukraine, not all are for moldova but this is the western spectrum but if they would give me, well, no need, this is the time to give. i told you that organization is the presence of huge millions of people who cooperate with each other in different areas. every year, every hour , there are plans, there are no plans, and this is developing . this attitude, if not only of the economy, why then why did they keep it put an end? the union of belarus of russia should become this centrifugal motivating and uniting impetuous force, which in the future will act as a driver of union integration only

in our examples. well, the third is to speak, so we must look not to repeat. all is well. yes, that is, today we we show what a union state is. today russia well done and belarus well done. we supply each other with quality leverage. the pace so that we hear each other and our viewers also hear our opinion peter , look at what i want to tell all my colleagues, what does the zimmerskaya say? yes , bureaucrats come to the european union, they say, here you will have this, this, this, this, this is our image of the future there. uh, then the americans say, this is this, but we don't . and what are you, here we are talking, here we are we only fulfill the agreement. this is how we make such beautiful ones, you know from all the speeches of the presidents from all the speeches of

our president. i can bring you one word, which, in principle, forms how the present such future justice is not for every statehood. this is not to live out such a humanitarian concept and an effective socio-political model. we have already begun to do this. here we have fixed in our constitutions adherence to traditional values, respect for traditional confessions. this, by the way, this is very e centripetal force. in what context? i work with a foreign contingent, a lot of families from western europe and north america move to us because they do not want to raise children in sodomy. this is a plus. the only thing is that our socio-political model should be competitive in many ways, and ours is fairer in many ways. she, so to speak, uh, responds more to an interesting person, but loses in many ways and listen, we will say that we have built a successful model when we have

turn. you see, three gay pride parades are ready to be held in the european union, you know, they are ready to send their children at the age of 12. this is the stems of maturation and allow to adopt only the state to drink and join nato when we create such a union, so i know with our russian friends. how many argued in one giant leads. these are white growth channels. recently i saw the head of this channel and su. guys, when you approach foreign policy with a calculator, you come up with beautiful things, when you said zhirinovsky stop feeding the caucasus, who are now fighting, here the ossetian was the minister of the sad network. now he is smolensky, he says, our guys are already the third there, the third line went and the fathers were fighting, and some guys, including those from the capital , quickly bordered. whether you understand it or not, they couldn’t have such things, and the same thing could never be said about belarus that we feed someone like that, no one has ever fed belarus. we provided the highest quality geopolitical services. you know in the cis we supplied the highest quality products the best rural special equipment. and only

today. release what should be done? listen. let's not make these mistakes, because today we will solve the issues. we'll put things in order in the south, and tomorrow they'll start billing us again. this means that we must always take into account when the situation returns to normal, then no one is immune from the fact that, in principle, we will return to the old painful issues . was to do. why we had to swing the situation from this side? and today we are broken in this, well, a word of error. we heard, but do you need to explain it or not? that a bilateral union is a slightly different union, or there is no need to explain that bilateral relations are qualitatively completely different. this is not theory, practice. and now, where is the third one that will come to us. let's search, and we must be an example for the ingredients. here we are today, of course, you understand, we will pass a little, the cis will listen to the opinion of nikolai budin. he to

unfortunately, he could not come to our studio, but i wished to seem, i will ask the directors to give his comment and continue our discussion , these platforms will flow. smoothly flow into something new. right now , the shanghai cooperation organization is on a very serious rise, and it is the asian vector that was set. uh, many countries of the world. today it is really developing and we can say that in the north, in the near future , the eastern direction will be the most promising from the point of view of the future, so let's say the development of the political e, a component of the world political component, therefore more than 50 countries come, therefore the circle of participants is expanding, therefore the state listens to what it says, but it was the organizations that were the stages to this, so to speak, understanding. they

will continue to work and give a positive result. perhaps over time they will form into something new, but nothing happens right away, and politicians, including a new politician who want everything at once, need to know about it. mm read the classics a little figure it out on your own. well, if they can’t understand, then listen to smart people who can give good advice. mikhailovich , were you the consul of the shanghan? still, well, how would you have zero years, yes, when, uh , something existed, but, probably, of such a scale and such. uh, well, the scope, she has not yet acquired. at that moment, what was the sco, and what is this organization? suddenly so abruptly? well, what is it called, it attracted all the other countries of the world that it did not originally include. well , i'm looking at this emblem, reading, shanghai hadzoji. this is the shanghai

cooperation organization. but really, i was lucky to work in china for more than 16 years, of which 10 years in beijing in our embassy, ​​so i remember this time when we started working on getting into the sco somewhere in 2007, and then it was some kind of nonsense for the rest of the participants, like us. in this regional to get and yet already in 2010. we have achieved this, i want to say, not just, uh, we were both partners and observers. uh, well, this is already a story in its archives, you can raise it, they do not burn some of our partners in the cis from central asia hindered our entry there into the e-shanghai cooperation organization. i absolutely agree. here u with my colleagues. and the republic of belarus during these almost 12 years

here since 2010, year after year, has proved to everyone and first of all, of course, russia and the people's republic of china and the central asian countries that it has passed the exam. not everything has matured. just watch already. we have now become really already becoming members of the shanghai organization cooperation. this is a huge prospect. taking advantage of listening time, we have already taken up the chinese theme. i think on behalf of all our colleagues, we will congratulate everyone who loves, who knows, uh, china of course, on the greatest historical date, which today has already begun from sunday in beijing, this is the twentieth congress of the communist party yes. and this is truly a great event. eh,

the communist party of 90 million holds such a congress once every five years. we have no doubt that, well, the real tasks are defined. uh, real plans and literally. i think within in the next decade, of course, china will become the number one power, and it is already practically from the point of view of this, but returning all the same to our topic of the shanghai cooperation organization, i want to say, here we discussed on the sidelines what the shanghai cooperation organization could give if we will be a member of this colleague organization, understand what it means to be, so to speak, yes, an observer. well, for god's sake, you're present. well, you look at nothing in between. here is the most striking example i wanted to give you how successfully our sco was successfully used kazakh friends of the then president nazarbayev in 2013, having agreed on a

singing day of almost 100 million, so to speak, yes, a project to build such a powerful logistical bridge from kazakhstan to leningrad. this port is the most powerful chinese port. look, kazakhstan is a land power. it was built with the help of the chinese. uh, already nagging your port and now look at all the cargoes of central asia, i'm finishing going through kazakhstan there to china from china from this port. uh, kazakh wheat and so on. and so further along started and so on. here's what we need to do, look. you had a weekend too. so the communist party of grodno sent congratulations, a word of greeting, an appeal to the participants of the congress. see while peter spoke, but in the final senses. yes, that is, there is, and capitalism is communism in the soviet union. but the communist party of belarus . look at the communist party of china in essence. well, two

organizations came out of the same root, but there with the cpsu yes, well, from the cpsu or the vkpb. here as you like, but in fact, here e, china is formed, as the semantic idea of ​​capitalism and socialism, chinese specifics chinese specifics. here you are. uh, looking at this experience, some kind of remake for the belarusian communist party for myself absolutely, but colleagues want to go back to the previous question for the time being, to explain to our viewers. i'm very worried about what might happen. people in belarus have such an impression that in these geopolitical realities belarus begins to storm, that is, some kind of integration unions into all kinds of associations. we this is not. and this work will absolutely support my colleague. she systematically did this and only thanks to a multi-vector policy, for which at one time she was very much criticized. literally, in

the last six months of the year, under the conditions of the most powerful sanctions pressure, we were able to reformat and rebuild the logistics supply chains of belarusian products, and now we are not just climbing, but our economy is showing. uh, such positive examples of speaking, cooperation and interaction between the cpb. and kppk. i want to say that, together with the communist party of the russian federation, the cpc is our main partner, we constantly compare watches. and we have similar positions on the vision of building a strategy for the future, but here again, returning to the question. you know the future strategy of the future, today we must stand today in order to build this future, but in order to expose, how to say it correctly, our president will only report together, and china and asia today are not just not new, but the center of a strong . they have always been the center of power in what today needs to be thought about today. and if we will today think about today, then we are

the strategy of alexander belarus people's organization, but today, because tomorrow may not come. first for this reason. wait, vadim, we are present at different sites and heads of state travel , these time zones change. you endure this crazy rhythm just so that when this geopolitical transformation happens, belarus takes its place and just takes, and takes its place. that's why many argue why there is a membership, firstly, this is a separate ska-i will say separately. listen, from coal and steel began to deal with the european union grew up such an organization. and that there was already cravings that could soon disintegrate. if you don’t listen to those, you understand, but the question is different, by the way , but on the threshold. today the americans are depriving all their questions and china is weakening both russia and the european union, and now it’s time to

organize things. first. uh, it means absolutely practical benefit, because you are participating in a specific site. provide your questions in the economic plane. that is negotiating security issues, and you don't stay on the sidelines, you understand, right? that is, you, uh, participate in global processes? that is, now there is a global redistribution of the world, correctly, we should be members of these organizations in order to influence the processes and then yes to the backyards and they also failed with their isolation sanctions, where putin where lukashenka is isolated, dozens of leaders come to meet it at the highest level he population most of the world. in any case, the leading leaders of the world, therefore, here these organizations allow us to be full-fledged subjects of international law, influencing global processes in the world, and you rightly said they listen with an open mouth to our leaders and vladimir vladimirovich and alexander grigoryevich, now we are the movement of our faces of this union state. anatoly sergeevich, you somehow got bored in

our discussion, i listen carefully a lot. please share your thoughts. maybe i 'll push you. uh, just the same, when we talk about the fact that belarus is now trying to score, he scored, or something, his place under the sun it is obvious that this will be the east direction. here which of the organizations do you think is paramount for our work on what to focus on? i think that taking into account the fact that today, as already mentioned , the most promising organization is moving to asia. still, the cis remains that south of the cis, which allows e-e to settle an agreement there within the framework of a free trade zone. e of central asia it allows the cis to cooperate and build an e -connection between integration associations in the cis and asian integration associations, for example, the same osian, for example, the same highway, but this is more about separatism. it's more of a political area. that is, today there is no such format in the world that we would say there is a

bipolar world. yes, the soviet union, for example, was against such a wording. polar world was a non-alignment movement that worked for a multi-polar world that basically the united nations was moving toward, uh, 10 years ago. let's remember what happened when i started to rise, china all the analysts and scientists had all the questions. will the world become bipolar again, will the united states come to an agreement with china and then what will happen to medium and small ones, and i will say even further from the states that have one diplomat sitting there in new york. i am with the americans, who have 500 diplomats or there are more sitting there, therefore answering your questions. i'll say it's asng. uh, yes, the vector is shifting to the south and belarus, uh, must understand what it understands, in principle, this can be seen from the positions put forward by our decision makers. uh, belarus should

occupy a central place in these networks. yes, sometimes this transport. we see that kazakhstan is now moving forward in transport. it 's okay, belarus, for example, as you said about the barrier, belarus is traditionally one of such main e main outposts there, well, outpost boof. there are many different western formulations, but our initiatives in the field of preventing drug trafficking prevent people from being trafficked. here we occupy, for example, a central position. this is what politicians don't talk about, but what they talk about for a second, just in support of the previous thesis. yes, maybe such an acute problem, but i will translate into everyday language. yes , when they can come to you, uh, god forbid, but come home with a pistol that is not registered anywhere. yes, uh, this discussion begins that they won’t come to you with a gun, just the same at the national level and further at the international multilateral level, because the problem of arms trafficking is human trafficking and uh, and drugs are three such

whale, as they are often called the world economy , it is almost impossible to solve them alone. therefore, belarus takes central positions on certain issues, on other positions belarus is working to gradually come out together with the countries of central central asia, this is very important. we often forget about them, because we are, as it were, in the center of europe. yes, we have the european union of the russian federation nearby, it is convenient for our business to trade, but central asia can be understood. yes, as you said for the layman. look, we're talking about that the cis is to some extent obsolete organizations somewhere. we say, i don’t think so, many people say, but you say that the cis is really for many, especially specialists in a priority organization on one principle for 31 years to work on the number of key documents that are already working and just take it and it is impossible to turn it off and it turns out that this is different hmm stepwise integration.

basically, it should just exist. well, i tell you the truth, these are not journalists, ordinary parents of science. from science it is that any multilateral treaty is always based on a network or system of bilateral treaties. the same is the same , the wto is the same general trade agreement, they all grew out of the system of bilateral treaties. today, this system needs to be raised to a multilateral level and further disseminated with our colleagues. and this experience in every possible way i declare and rehabilitate. e. well, i would like to add a certain role of belarus here, let's remember how we were poisoned with fairy tales that belarus is important for china only as transit boor. yeah, we see how the restructuring of belarusian-chinese relations is going. we have now reached the highest level of partnership. this is an all-weather partnership after, by the way, how they officially applied for membership in the sco. this should also be borne in mind, but for china we are becoming. they are the same

project. look who's around us, right? lithuania, which is on the list and which travels to taiwan and develops anti-chinese separatism. the west, which stands next to us, we become a showcase for china, for russia, we the geostrategic direction of protecting moscow, that is, we are strategically important. if you want , we are for eurasia, this is germany for the west, then we become the cold war. if we endure , we will join this system, we will get what we wanted, we can add a little. yes. uh, once again i want to confirm this thesis that belarus has passed the maturity exam, maybe for hmm our tv viewers and with everyone this fact is known, but today it is already well known . yes, and for more than one year the economic belt

of the silk road, or we say yes, and the onion belt and way so, i want to say that somewhere in the weather, when the president of the people's republic of china announced the start of this grandiose program of a grandiose project, because china did not have a final decision. how to let this path from china go further through e, russia or kazakhstan and further, then either through belarus or through the baltic states or through ukraine, and literally in 2015, china made the final decision to let the entire flow and they did not lose through belarus , i must say, what shall we say again so passed the maturity exam, because we this time. well, firstly, we ensured absolutely 100% political stability, which is very important for business in the future. i wanted to say, look how we modernized the belarusian railways by purchasing new ones. uh, equipment, wagons, and so on and so forth. and now we, well, what do you say,

this is logistics, this is this. more is trying to turn the course towards china now. yes, yes, unlike the baltic states, the poles do not conduct this anti-chinese course, on the contrary, they came many times in the tenth years and spoke. well, so, let's get out the pig's mouth. there continuation. why then completely? look at the olympic games. uh, in beijing , we see that there are no stats there. we see no germany. but duda is there, yes, but they understand what china means, we must understand that we should not set our goals for china to be a transit country. our goal is to join the technological production industrial chains and the belarusian-chinese industrial park for this, and for this purpose, electric capacitors for medical various things have been created, which we jointly produce masvich engines there. if

so he says, yes it is, but import substitution and b we become needed, china and china is needed. moreover, we are also needed by russia in import substitution, thereby conjugating everything eurasian that this is a guarantee that god forbid that we have such a rebellion as in the twentieth year, because the main the goal was that the de-industrialization of belarus in order to completely clear this country of production and fill it with western goods. with such a partner as china, it will be extremely difficult. yes, and unlike the european union, we will survive. but the european su- today is facing the issue of industrialization. why because the americans want to take their industry and bring it to them in the fight against china we would n't talk to another organization like that today. if we touched on this in passing, let's talk about security about dc about this. that's probably where the questions are. eh, a lot has accumulated lately. and kohl

we see now the development of the situation. we understand that belarus and russia understand that our parenthesis relationships. in all spheres, there they are absolutely on a different level, but we are starting a union state, of course, the military sphere. naturally, we understand that, well, we are protected by, uh, our ally. we go hand in hand with each other there and in any case, we will fight back together, the question arises. why do we need the rest, if everything is so incomprehensible in the relationship, everything is so ambiguous between them, or maybe it’s just the same here on the dkb. it's time to make a point. well, this is generally the wrong approach. uh, firstly, i don't agree with the cis a little. unfortunately, our president said incorrectly that the organization has weakened, it is necessary to strengthen the economic and political component there, but the advantage of the cis is that this organization, in principle, expressed both the economic union and the union state and the csto. therefore, you understand the soil, this is the fertile soil that

gives birth, so the offset is possible. well, although here is the economic court of the cis what is it, maybe you need to read the documents, you understand, you need to read the documents of the economic court of the cis a nuclear power plant that works, yes, yes, but i’m just saying that vitya’s fertile mail is still growing, but if we take documents with you, then the powers of the cis bodies, unfortunately, are not the ones to help regarding the csto. you see, the main problem is contradictions, but i will explain to you why you are fighting? what do you think, for the territory? well, think of some territory is not enough, the farther from you, the farther away from you located. uh, military formations battle heads, how did the cuban missile crisis in the world placed missiles all there in the room. there is the caribbean sea, from there the turks started and we went there closer to the caribbean islands now berlin moscow is a treaty we will not be well aware that today, when we talk about global

security, the farther we have a security belt. we would have more allies in this region. kazakhstan would be with kazakhstan if then, unfortunately, individual politicians are not always appreciated. i’m not talking about my president of kazakhstan now. i’m talking about the political establishment, which today speaks impartially against russia, but then it played a decisive, decisive condensing british occupies the project. yes, especially energy ones, and therefore they express it, but this is wrong, therefore it really played its role in dkb. and by the way, uh, this is uh, after all, it was not easy to defend kazakhstan, because they wanted to set fire to central asia, central asia, it became the economy of kazakhstan in the larger economy of all the countries of central asia, you understand, if this country was approached, that is, you need to understand these processes, therefore, any expansion of some kind of geopolitical union of education or a military bloc is a, which means the distance of the threat from their own guns. therefore, we will

deal with this. another question plays on a contradiction. you understand, including today, what is ours. weakness they control the international financial system trading international arms trade in many ways control control international institutions that can impose sanctions understand, have you ever seen that you against the united states, someone waged sanctions any war unleashed. why spit voted not voted and we entered yes russia has imposed sanctions, but your sanctions are a mosquito bite to a certain extent. unfortunately, but see the hair, showed the european union today that they depend, including this equipment. the only problem. i want to say that today everyone understands everything that they are doing. russian federation at the moment, this is the plan of the united states of america. they did not want to weaken europe , weaken russia, destroy the slavs as much as possible. professionally and while you and i are not able to strike, but think about a blow, or a threat to strike,

as well as in geopolitical terms and fate. i'm in the campaign in the uk in washington and london, they will tilt us, and while we play second fiddle, you understand if you tilt, right? well, we are afraid of restricted trade. today you are forced to sell potash fertilizers cheaper than carriers. and it is true that one president told us about this and that in some situations countries do not support each other, and i still understand, yes, if we have the organization and organization of the cis - this is the union of equal partners, right, but sovereign, but sovereign, but equal, i emphasized equal, which, in principle, i understand that the problems of each can be the problems of the other. but after all, it doesn’t always work out, and so it is about dkb. relatively speaking, we started with the fact that the cis will become an observer on the cst. and for what hmm here is nothing discussion goes

on with us, please. here are the details ask the disk. the question is the level of real threats. for themselves and for them peoples. see what's what. come on, it's an organization. let me make a deal. uh-huh that's when this block will become, uh, really strong and able to respond to nato. the main problem is the point of turbulence, which is the us of its policy and methodology. they are proxies of conflicts around russia, china , new ones will be created and there will be a hotbed somewhere, it will be drawn in, and so, while we all mean the leaders of the countries that are members of the csto and, first of all, the cis countries, the leaders here are only by their power. eh, so to speak let's say, by a strong-willed political decision, they won't be able to unite into such a bloc that can really counter the challenging threats until then we'll be in the bars. well

, look, you need to listen to the president. january of this year showed that, in principle, countries can unite in the face of adversity absolutely calmly in kazakhstan, they calmed down. no matter how we are not politicians, and we do not know. how did this happen, but in any case, the troops were brought in and the situation calmed down, but the situation is now on the kyrgyz-tajik border, the situation is armenia shows azerbaijan that the csto may not be so much dialectic of contradictions over national and narrowly national. yes, here is the tajik kyrgyz border. what is the problem? are there any scattered villages? yes, why swap territories water is just a struggle for water. these have water, these don't have water. turn off the water and that's it, but the main problems. what is the organization, has not yet become a tool for solving this issue. and why, because again returning to my

thesis, there is no image of the future. and what can to be an image of the future, american geopolitics at the beginning of the 20th century fully said that the natural eurasian borders were the unification of all of eurasia into a natural, geopolitical bloc with the decision of the internal economic political borders of the russian empire at the beginning of the seventeenth year of arrival, which is desired. and we say aloud the cis there are brothers, let's solve this issue, of course. do you know that we have this issue, is it actually spelled out, how to solve it? then, ask yourself a question like a smart person. why hasn't this been resolved so far? way. finding an opportunity for russia to intervene between the warring countries, they call for it, and in this case, too, you know, tajikistan, kyrgyzstan, and the existing peacekeeping mechanism does not start, because they don’t even want to sign. but still. let's not fantasize about launching the mechanism of countries that have

not fully shown their interest in this launch of the mechanism and doing everything, therefore, everything is in a new state. why, when this new state, as you say, the attraction is there. yeah, i can't say enough about the military appeal, maybe economic will not happen. then we will become generally common to all, but it seems that in some new format, in my opinion, our discussion would like to say that, probably, we should not harbor illusions and say that all participating countries have. no matter what kind of association there should be a common goal, everyone should live there soul in soul and understand each other, all dishes here have their own interests. well, however, as in life, but now understand that sometimes the protection of your own interests. it is impossible without general protection. well, belarus should appear in any organization, which will in some way concern peace in our country, and the more active we are there, the more truly we will live in peace.

we suggest you go on a full-fledged excursion, in our country the power and independence were built in the 11th century by the polotsk prince. this is the first stone temple on the territory of belarus to get acquainted with the best guides our wolf.

exotic trees still grow here in the ancient park, planted in the days of aristocrats in kuzhenetsky. and visit the most unusual castles-estates. and now i will ask the operator to show us the opposite bank of the dnieper, this catholic costume of st. joseph the betrothed was built on the site of a dominican church in the early 19th century. travel with us to belarus on the 24th of the project of real heroes of our time, chosen charmers to attract beautiful smiles, we invite you to a computer game where everything is real, who has stronger and not only muscles, but also nerves. which of

you? i will continue the week of you as a superhero. i give people light, warmth and hope, difficult trials and genuine emotions, so that overcome all obstacles. today, they need to use their skills not by 100, but by 200 percent, see the hero project on our tv channel. we used to love running barefoot here. here we received the very first. it was my grandmother who taught me the knowledge and skills of diligence about the advice of dobrynya people. i love woodworking. this is my kind of hobby, it’s practically here, when i have free time, i’m right away this wonderful land of polissya perhaps in every village or

city there is a place that people are proud of, about which i want to talk about a pearl our ancestral home is a chapel, a family tomb, azheshka, look, a project of polish on belarus 204 tv channel in this show, participants and viewers are waiting for tricky questions fermented milk drink made from mare's milk, what is it called? and why are you whispering, you are hiding something from me about your answer. nobody watched the simpsons, very cool. then. come up with a city and call it intuition, the main erudition. it will definitely come in handy here. so this is the abduction of europe. this is how it looks to you. well, in some pictures, it certainly looks better. but what we have is what we have, amazing this is

the correct answer. in case of an incorrect answer. we have to go to the construction site. think well before you say it, and one more element is the tower at 99.9, how the dna test will not work, watch the intellectual entertainment project tower on belarus 24 tv channel. baby what is happening to you, mom, i'm dying? i doctors never say that the patient is hopeless? i'm nothing i'm katya and who are you, do you hear katya and you know how to read ? yes, then take the magazines. come on , i used to be stronger than i could drive all day dangle. we'll go with you. dialect where

do you watch the melodrama bird on sunday on belarus 24 tv channel? away from the bustle of the city. here are your roots and your strength. go ahead to come to yourself. slow down and enjoy the moment, and the direction will tell the verses. every step

unity with nature its own wild ancient yelnya inspires belarus it is important that people make a decision on which government agencies will rely. this was emphasized by the president of belarus alexander lukashenko, discussing with the participants of the big meeting, the formation of the entire belarusian national meeting in february at the referendum belarusians. determined the path of further development of the country. now you need to approach the task of building an appropriate legal foundation, the necessary bills developed