now let's say an influx gradually. we have , uh, a reserve national team and from bobruisk, let's say a lot from brest, so we will decide. i think joint efforts together with the support of the state. i think new facilities will be built. and we still hope that in the near future we will get the ownership of the object, which will be valid only for paralympic athletes. thank you very much, and be sure to convey to the guys the wishes to show to the maximum everything they are capable of. thank you. thanks for the questions. the program replied nikolai shudeika general secretary of the paralympic committee of belarus results and analysis of the main events of this week in the informational analytical program atn. main broadcast. all projects of our tv channel are available on the website www.berus24.by, as well as in social networks. i'm sorry to you. all the best.

today olga shpilevskaya, chairman of the belarusian union of women and dmitry shevtsov, secretary general of the belarusian red cross society, are visiting our studio. today is an extremely pleasant occasion for a meeting. it seems that it is like with any other holidays, victory day, independence day, parental love and such a concept is eternal and children, probably, always need it. and how modern parents are now parents who are chasing a career by earning money are able to find time. and in general, let's take this very love, there is love. children, you can definitely chase this, you can not be at home for a career, even 24 hours a day, but you need to love the child unconditionally, because the child feels the parent's love very much, this does not mean that mom should hold his hand. there 24 hours a day. this means that he must understand that he is unconditional, but immersed in this parental love, then he will open up to his parents, and then he will respond to them in the same way, then he will feel protected, and therefore it

seems to me looking at modern conditions , despite the fact that we all run parental love, no one has canceled. even, maybe , it needs to be tripled, probably, just in this situation, when well, really our children need our love, like never before last year, and in belarus they introduced a new holiday, where they are their father, how much he is in demand and always. he says that mom is the main person in life, how important, in general, how much our society is ready for such a holiday. well, you know, if it was introduced, then society is ready, of course, for this holiday. i treat him absolutely calmly inertly. and there is well, good. yes, to be honest, somehow i’m busy with my workload, i even forget what holidays are, because mmm, thank god, but we don’t have that gender equality, that is, the degree to which they are trying to position it in the west, and therefore e we men are used to giving

a woman a holiday. therefore, when there is, when there is march 8, a holiday, when there is, uh, mother's day - this is a holiday in fact, when we always congratulate women not only on these holidays. but this is especially when you give flowers, congratulate your colleagues. this is probably more fun for real men than just, uh, celebrating father's day. i don't even know, i'll add. it's good that we don't have this gender equality, you said correctly, therefore, our women, but give love to men. and why do i mean that it was on the initiative of the belarusian connection of women, namely, we became the initiators so that we have such a holiday father's day. that is, he continues to want, as if, here, uh, something to give you thanks, i studied, in the end it turned out to be such a week of parental love care, which begins with the mother and ends with the fathers. it's actually, right because ah, there's no holiday. this does not mean that we

must be there. celebrate what to celebrate? yes, uh, that's right, you said it right. e, we have a very good, parental week, when mom starts and ends with dad, and we understand that a family in the republic of belarus is in fact, as it is written in the constitution, a union between a man and a woman. this is the most important society, well, the cell of society touched upon the topic of gender equality , inequality, traditional values ​​in the republic of belarus are certainly supported, but, nevertheless, all the same there is influence. yes, some other values. what do you think? hasn't such a stereotype shifted now, well, they used to bring up a boy, like cars there are tools. yes girls are dolls there, pink dishes for a boy in autumn have now shifted and is it good that it is shifting? here is the concept that a girl is not only a kitchen children yes a boy is not only prey, as is now with

this one. yes, i don’t know, it seems like nothing has shifted in my family. well, i have two. uh sons, so don't know how girls are now educate, but in any case, i have a very big difference of 10 years between children and that my first child played with boyish toys, and there with toy soldiers. and the same for the second one. we are the same son, despite the fact that the age of informatization has already stepped far. forward. they say it's impossible. that's how strictly to divide the gender role. nobody shares them. the children themselves choose. if he grows up in a normal family, then he probably chooses what to play with. if dad is dad, then the son, of course, he loves mom, but wants to be like dad, so he will play with cars and soldiers. i don’t know how to run with the guys down the street with a pistol or play some games on bicycles with a toy machine gun to knock down knees, that’s all

fine. children should go through this and grow normally and actively, and it seems to me that it does n’t even matter what they play with. true, because boys grow up to be good cooks who are in the kitchen. well, it’s like the gods in the kitchen, who can cope with absolutely everything , it’s clear that now, as it were, in such an age of progress, when technology facilitates women’s share. yes, because we do not stand there do not clean. uh, yes, and the dishwasher, it will wash, so we have more free time. we can do some more. and maybe not typical before. this woman is doing some things, there is nothing wrong with it, no matter what children play, it is important how they grow up. now, for example, i am very happy that american cinema, like european animation, is especially leaving our market, and it’s good, because what they are now showing to children, when there transgender people appear to snow white or there, but there must be some kind of homosexual couple in any cartoon. i'm not talking about youth films or something else, it's something that affects the subcortex. yes, and no matter how we raise children when they are sitting in this. the

subcortex is affected and they consider it and they consider it to be normal, so, i don't want our children to think, this is normal. i want them to understand that we are traditional orthodox people and, uh, so that they absorb these good and kind cartoons that we you have always watched, yes, the same engine from romashkovo. well, wait, whatever, so, well, will we not again face criticism that we limit censorship, introduce and so on, for god's sake, let them criticize, if they want to criticize for this, let them criticize. i believe that this is not criticism, recognition 100% agree. and you know, uh, there should always be censorship, but only it should be reasonable censorship. yes , there is no need to reach the level of despotism. here it is impossible. i'm right. and only it is not so, but censorship must always be, because we now we understand that e part of the sites, thank god, are now developers, not only

the country as well. he starts to block, because, frankly, i'm scared when my child at 6-7 years old gets on the internet, and everything pops up, of course, violence and sex and drugs and everything pops up. now, thank god, this is being blocked, so censorship should always be due to censorship. normal children grow up as normal, respectable people. still does not limit by 100% here is such an aggressive propaganda western non-traditional family values. and what to do with it? this is the very example that we must set, how to limit and explain to the child that yes. it's there, but it's alien. we are parents and we must explain what is good and what is bad. remember, little son came to his father and asked the baby. what is good and what is bad, that is, we parents always play the role of those people who lay these life guidelines in our children, if parents really love their child, if he is an authority for him, then the opinion of the parent will be for him without conditionally, it

’s all the same, so that we don’t try to invest in it from the outside, he will still rely on the opinion of mom or dad, because he believes that they are they main in the family. yes, this is them. uh, those from whom they take an example, and therefore here are our correct conversations with them. hmm ban censorship. yes, but, probably, you need to endlessly talk with children, endlessly talk and endlessly explain to them, answer all their questions, endlessly explain. i want to say it emphasize the role of grandmothers, because now i understand for sure that i will be a good grandmother, because my mother was young, and it seems to me that i was not able to invest and explain everything, and now i’m already trying somewhere, there are adults 22 -year-old daughter to explain some things that i didn’t lay down and i for myself i’ve precisely determined that when i have grandchildren, i won’t regret not a second of time to explain to explain, but to show to convince, so that here are globally some values ​​to lay in them, which then no one will be able to say my mother, which, uh, when? i alone once

asked. i say, uh, mom, why are there grandchildren yes, there are my older brothers and sisters? i say why do you love them so much, we were constantly strict. she says i didn’t understand then how much you need to love, so everything comes with time from censorship - this does not mean a ban, er, that’s all. taboo this. no. we must, uh, tell the children since it exists, we must tell that there are some non-traditional, but the relationship between the sexes there and so on there this is not unnatural. this is the disease. it's a mental illness, really. and these are the things we have to say. and most importantly, because the child looks at the family, if the family has normal human family values, if in society, e, intolerance of this kind of perversion that exists yes, for god's sake, for god's sake, i always say about it, well.

which is easier to say, i always say that this is still a mental disorder and illness, so it must be treated, including here, and who wants to imitate. well god for the sake of it, so you know, i always say that if there is a father or mother in the family, there they smoke beer, or other alcoholic beverages, then it will be very difficult for the child to tell that it is harmful and he will be convinced by the example of his beloved parents, that this is normal, so here we must understand that if there are normal relations in the family, if the parents love each other and love the child, then he will naturally understand that such things exist somewhere, but this is unnatural. that's all. well, they just have to correctly explain to the child what it is. like this since childhood? well, that's it, they said about the disease, because with regard to the accusation, it is really impossible to be completely intolerant of this, because we will now intimidate everyone and say so. well, you just can't do it. and even if you're like this, maybe a complete one, remember how violence is here. well

, it's easy for parents to understand that if we notice some things, well, we notice some inclinations. yes, you need to e not to say in time that a well is and is. it's good. so this is normal, and we will continue to live like this it is necessary to take this correctly to the disease in time to notice it and ask for the help of specialists in order to see how this thing can be straightened into normalcy under maximum conditions. you see, therefore, here both teachers and parents should also be very attentive to their children in order to understand some things in time to accept and understand what to do with it, not to give up, not to say that this is abnormal should stand. normally we are at all, yes, i don't see, yes, or at all there on in the west everyone lives like this and it is generally considered there, the cooler it is very popularized very aggressively insists on a normal society, but is literally pushed by everyone in any case, and they understand that now traditional family life is normal. you are no

longer values, so they go right through cartoons through teen movies, where it's all absolutely normal through uh, the policy that the child should choose the gender. who said that? it 's definitely something. sorry pervert and mentally a sick person, yes, here, or a group of people, here, so this is aggressively layered. we know why this is being done. yes, this is done to destroy entire civilizations of entire countries, including entire societies, so this is a long-term policy, so we should not get involved in this. we have normal human values. we talk a lot about them in the new constitution. it was written down and we discussed it with the whole society, thank god we accepted these things. to the whole team of our country. well, what is, of course, there is no need for any aggression towards these people. yes and absolutely not. and i always say that if it does not concern me, and he likes it, or for god's sake. if they are life, the most

important thing, yes, most importantly, do not layer. it is not necessary for me that the minority be absolutely aggressive. after all, i don’t tell on every corner, uh, about mine. eh, family values ​​don’t go with a poster, i don’t go there, i don’t talk about it, they don’t position it. they are at work nowhere, so live a normal life. your free time is your free time. and how do you feel better? this is how you live. most importantly, do not broadcast it to society and do not make yourself look like someone. yes, you don’t have to plant yourself into some kind of incomprehensible speaker, that since i’m like that, probably, everyone, uh, discriminate against god somewhere for the sake of live and work together with everyone. we have just talked about ideal families, where parents love each other, parents love children, but in belarus

there is only one problem of divorce, probably one of the most acute in family business, and in fact very often that very connection is breaking down when a child communicates with parents, yes, adults turn on different techniques, and manipulations, and so on. and how to resist, how to solve this problem? in general, is it possible to solve this problem, but in general, adults should understand that divorce and a child should understand that divorce is a process of depriving him of parental love, there are a lot of examples when people get divorced, but they still have excellent relationships with kids. and the father is in the family and the mother is in the family. yes they live together so there were circumstances, it happens in different ways. yes, or maybe it's for the best, because we remember when people often kept families. eh, well, as if for the sake of it being full-fledged and at that time they were beating each other there. they threw tantrums there and it’s not clear then where the child is morally, but it’s easier to grow up. is it good? yes? here it is important

that parents do. it is deliberately careful not to harm your children. and i will say that, for example, i also divorced very early, my child was 5 years old, but she was not only she's not a father or a mother, i never had a bad word about my father come out of my mustache, because, well, as if it was my decision and his decision that we were sort of breaking up, so here. it seems to me that it all depends on how wise adults are, how carefully they treat their child, how much they love him and how much they understand how important a child is, and to grow up exactly in the parental unfortunately, not everyone understands this, it may be needed on the state. i don't know any program. how is help. how to force a how to make a person happy? what law to write? what program to create? yes, people have different characters, they seem to live in such love, such a married couple gorgeous and a baby. they have a good everything afterwards. i found some kind of scythe on a stone, but they don’t get divorced right up to sawing the tv. yes , you are looking at these things. you understand that those people have become each other, just

some kind of natural enemies of the savages, and then the manipulation of the child begins. i won't give you a child. you won't see him at all. uh, at best, 2 hours there on the weekend you will do something better for someone, but the child will grow up, he will understand that he was artificially limited in his father's love. yes, the family broke up and used it, and then nothing good will come of it. maybe he will even say these things to his mother someday, so we must understand that you said it right. yes remain in everything people did not work out for you love, stay, just good friends. and most importantly, never manipulate a child, the child must understand that his mother loves him and loves him. and dad, sometimes families need the help of a competent psychologist, and talk to discuss so that they understand. k - this is a situation, even if the psychologist does not help save the marriage, in any case, he will make sure that these people remain good friends for a long time

and continue to communicate. even with other families there. i want all adults with you. just respect the rights of the child. we must understand that a child is not our property, not our toy, it is a person with his own rights and this person has. even if the little one has the right to so that he has the same mother's love and father's love. if you want your rights to be respected, when you get older, your children respect the rights of the child in this case, but then again there is a second side of the original justice, which is so developed in europe, which also tried to us, but hmm i won’t say what to impose , but to suggest we call it that way, as far as it is in demand with us, you know, well, i want to tell you hmm from my point of view, not a lawyer, i immediately say a doctor - this is nonsense. eh why? because, and in our country, uh, choice somewhat different way we have a state to protect the rights of the child. we have such a

concept as children left without parental care, who are taken care of by the state. children are in a socially dangerous position when the state knows that there are families that need to be reviewed and looked after by the social security police, teachers and doctors. all over the world. we are looking. yes, this is, probably, justice, when we take care of the whole world about a child. they are what dad or mom gave a belt to a child because he is not good, but you know used used. this is a very authoritative method. and i experienced a very short method of presenting information on myself. eh, the same sometimes. i don’t use this anymore, but, but i used it on children, you understand, there’s nothing wrong with that, because the child must understand that he did badly, he will be punished and it’s not necessary to beat him , but explain. yes, well, if

you need to take it by the ear, pat it there or there, figuratively speaking, that's the most important thing. we must understand that we will do it. and as a condemnation of that act, which he did not in order to beat him up, so that this child would be physically hurt, but, but we collide, especially in the united states and in europe, including mom and dad abused me, or there is a manipulation to understand when the child understands, that they don’t buy something for him, they don’t give him, and he starts. yes, and he begins to manipulate his parents. i will call now, i will say that you are beating me, the police will come and take me away. the child himself does not understand these things, but he does not return to this family anymore, and he went further through the reception families. so you tell me where this child is better in his natural family, where his mother gave birth? yes, where they

were connected together with the placenta by the umbilical cord. yes, where dad, together with childhood, did not sleep at night either, he helped raise this child. yes, he is somewhere, maybe there, either mom or dad went a little too far in terms of punishment or something else, or censure or a new family that just took this child like a kitten, how they will raise him there, what he will be raised by a child, then, uh, receives severe psychological trauma, which, among other things, are revealed in those facts when, then, at the age of eighteen, he comes to school and makes a colossal tragedy human victims. these are also the consequences of these things, deep psychological trauma, i agree in general, but as far as justice is concerned, there is such a moment. after all, they are withdrawn not only from uh, families that lead a social way of life. there is also the point of low-income families, that is, here imagine from the poor, families of perfectly healthy families whose children are taken away from good moms and dads for subsequent transfer to prosperous

families, in general, the institution of the family is destroyed in this way. in my opinion. yes, when a child is not attached to a family, when he understands that he can grow up here and there and somewhere else, and these children who are not attached to a family, who do not have, but in the face of mom and dad, uh, people whom they trust unconditionally. yes, they become so very, but manipulated, because they do not have authorities. they have the authority of all the adults who raised them at one time or another. and in general they become without authority. and they then it lends itself very well to manipulation, so there is such a moment and at the same time. here, juvenile justice is good, but in the united states, in some states , the death penalty for minors is retained. they can go to jail for life. we don't have that. even, in principle, yes, so here, well, it seems to me that we have some of our traditional moments. i also say no lawyer. and as a person who looks from the outside, they need to be adhered to, we don’t need to plant something from the outside that, as it were, is traditional for us unacceptable. we talked about the fact that we are raising children who need it all over the world, we are helping the social intimate

state. but this is the trend for us to have many children, which has been for quite a long time. it is going on now or we are going to tears as europeans. this is the decline in the birth rate. in general, they have already talked a lot, probably about the fact that benefits support for families with many children are not in everyone, but in some cases it plays a completely different role. yes, that is, the opposite. i give birth, there 4-5 i will get an apartment, you must admit such cases, after all, there are also large families from big ones there , if the family understands that they can not save money in order to get q to buy an apartment, yes, they give birth to a third one there. the fourth child gets an apartment. yes, yes, it provides benefits to the state, and they understand that they have one problem. one of the most important problems has become smaller. they have blood over their heads. and what's wrong with that is absolutely normal understand? i myself am from a large

family. i am the fourth in my family. yes, it used to be absolutely normal and absolutely ordinary, but then it was the xx century. now the 21st century is urbanization, and it technologies are the internet and now, of course, stereotypes have changed. now. uh, all or a similar number of people have a career in the first place, therefore, according to statistics, we note that the first marriages became late for the first children became later. yes, there the birth of a second child already over 30 is far from it. yes, which has never happened before. and the level of education is completely different. and the ambitions are completely different and life dictates these things, therefore, naturally, one or two children, but nonetheless. we see, that absolutely sufficient families that have a business there or hold some responsible positions. and they have three four

children and five children already, three of them are not having many children , somehow they are gone. well, for me. this is a large three children - this is actually a great feat. and most importantly from the point of view. uh, statistics are not for popularization. it 's the other way around, already the development of a step forward. that is, there is already a replacement of generations, because two children is not reproduction. yes, it's just marking time. and one child is on the contrary, a rollback. yes, therefore. and we must , and the state do a lot. why not? this is how we encourage. yes , please express children. there are three, four five. there's as much as you want. how much health will allow you? and uh, desire, well, the state takes care of you and a lot of parental capital. there is children's capital, and uh, support for families and support for these children and those with many children, including the state, stimulate yes. uh, paternity leave, yes and uh,

maternity leave, including childcare there, can anyone and dad go and mom, that is, the state supports all these things and do not be shy about it, some say yes. for the sake of the apartment, we are such thank god and thank god, so i absolutely agree about the 21st century. in fact , in the twentieth century there was a cult of the child in the 21st century. unfortunately our youth. this cult of children is leaving. when we created families, we understood that the next step should be the appearance of a child. now young people are replacing children with cats and dogs. it 's true, why, because the child binds to the place the child does not give the opportunity to go somewhere freely to do what we want. well, somehow, all this is turning, that is, they feel the child, how these regrets. yes, to some of their, uh, family circumstances. and it has to go. we must change this, because in fact we are then going with you to the fact that our young people will stop giving birth altogether, therefore, the more benefits there are, the more we will talk

about this, the more specialists will talk in schools about that there is a cult of the family, there is a cult of children, that children are happiness and children. this is great, not children are obese. and what if you don’t have to be afraid while you don’t have a home, because many people are postponing. here i am, first there is housing, then a career. well, it doesn’t happen with housing and a career goes away, health goes somewhere, a woman’s native age. he walks strength in order to fully educate these children and give them the necessary attention, so everything is fine on time. thank you very much for a very interesting conversation. i hope that the week of parental love will allow us to once again look at our families and make the right decisions. thank you thank you

everything begins with the origins and traditions of the memory of our ancestors. preservation of the culture of belarusian rituals and crafts but the world is changing. changes generations views and creativity does not stand still. when people realize the value of traditions and understand where to move on, art takes on new bright colors.