or after the next booster, that is, the present time, while it remains so. uh, such a vaccination schedule, when will we vaccinate with a booster, and every six months, regardless of which vaccine. whether it will be a satellite of the first component, or it will be a satellite of the second component, or another vaccine that may appear on our market today, there is a russian and chinese vaccine on our market. i'm talking about comedy now. is there any plan to expand this list? here , due to some others, maybe literally in the coming days, we expect that the market will come out. uh, the cuban vaccine was collecting plus and it will just be possible to use it too for a quick vaccine. every weekend can be turned into a little vacation. the main condition is new impressions, and better many new impressions together we will discover the amazing places of our country. this is

dobrovitov's village. here live our dobravite residents, who live in the hills. as you can see , we built our own houses here, let's plunge into history. this mirror is very old. he is over 100 years old during the war the germans wanted, like trophies to bring it out with a mirror, but something prevented them and let's share our first impressions. see in the program the route was built on the tv channel belarus 24.

hello, the club of editors on tv channels and belarus 1 and satellite tv channel belarus 24 will discuss the most important most interesting topics, the outgoing week is what is being discussed in the country and in the world. and right away i will introduce the guests who came to us here today at makarenko nine dmitry alexandrovich zhuk head of the holding sb belarus today marat markov e, head started the second national tv channel oleg romanov, chairman of the republican public association belaya rus petr petrovsky, political analysts and vadim borovik. political analyst. good evening. thank you very much for coming, but the most recent thing that is being discussed today is that which is present in all the news feeds today. the head of state inspected certain types of weapons that our army has. we’ve just been writing during the day, watching, literally reading together and discussing, but i propose to discuss it now.

well, firstly, from a common point of view, the president again said that we don't need any war . everyone should do his own thing. i need to escalate the situation, but we know who is escalating it, the one who has been spreading fakes for decades in our country. this is a foreign intelligence agency. foreign media are their belarusian accomplices, which, uh, many, fortunately, are not media in our country, but it was interesting, of course, to listen to look at the weapons that were presented to the head of state. i think that not everything was shown to us, but what what showed interesting two components of what i saw are tanks and drones, as for tanks. as i understand it, to be a tank , but they need to be modernized. we've been talking t-72. yes, the basic, uh, basic tank and all these types of weapons show themselves well in the conflict that we are seeing, uh, south of our country. the only thing that, of course, needs to be improved. as i understand it, there should be dynamic protection and

better optics and night vision devices and so on. well, here's an interesting quote. i wanted to represent the state. belarus has adjusted its approaches to equipping the troops, based on the experience of its russia in ukraine, the president told reporters about this. the head of state noted that earlier there were large-scale plans to equip troops worth billions of dollars until 2030, but when the special operation began, its realities showed the need to adjust approaches. maybe we can go very far by spending a lot of money, but not achieve results, which i would like to note alexander lukashenko and experience has shown that he prefers the military over simple, but modernized reliable technology. well, just about what we were talking about, because there are many cases when the most modern fancy tank with various options fails and the servicemen do not know what to do with them. generally. what is it like? i think it's a very important thing. well, the trouble is, uh, next door to us. but it’s really a sin to hide this misfortune, you need to

take advantage and learn from other people’s mistakes, because it’s better than, of course, learning from your own mistakes and the fact that we are now uh, correcting our plans for some armament. this is a very important thing, if you will, yes, military you start. let's start with the simple fact that the president defined this main message that you don't have to spend a lot of money in order to fight successfully yes, because in any case, it's clear that belarus is a small country, it is not as rich as the strongest in the world in everything and in at the same time, the quality of our weapons can and should be appropriate in order to inflict as i recall. if necessary, unacceptable damage. what is the enemy is? history itself says that countries often go when they do not have the opportunity to make very expensive weapons. they follow the path of mass character and simplicity; we recall the great patriotic war

, the t-34 tank. it was very simple, very massive. and most importantly for a tank, if we touched on this topic, it should be. which is repairable right on the battlefield, because tanks often get damaged, which can and should be repaired not in the factory, but directly on the front line , so the t-72 itself is of good quality developed, real in service with many countries of the world, including russia itself due to the new optics, which belarus has been perfectly able to do since the time of the soviet union, we had an excellent school in this regard and many visor engineers who graduated from the minsk vizru of the best military engineering school of the soviet union they are still working in this area, but believe me, they know it personally. it's like a graduate. naturally, the second point is that which concerns directly. obviously a means of communication. yes, means of targeting or pointing, and so on. that is this is all attachments, it is

untenable, because the modern war war in ukraine has shown. how should it be? how can it be? well, plus, after all, not only tanks, after all, today the president paid a lot of attention, including to other types of weapons and support, because about bayraktars, martyrs and so on, but now only as they say, not mine does not say what it really proved to be effective. eh, directly. and by the way, expensive bayraktars were criticized in pooh and on shahid worth 800 dollars, which destroys e, weapons worth several hundred thousand dollars, and in the case, maybe even millions. yes, this is obviously an effective weapon, but i would like to draw attention to one more point, see, uh, why i am talking about equipping one of the points that already exists now, uh, the president drew

attention directly to the media, including the provision of ordinary infantrymen namely, first-aid kits hmm when are we talking about? the safety of life is not only about the ability to fight, but the safety of life of each soldiers who are present in russia with harnesses of the problem appeared. you know what the question is. uh, there aren't enough medics for everyone. yes? naturally, they should not be there for every soldier in the medic. this means that the first-aid kit itself provided medical assistance in a timely manner. this is 90% of the survival rate of a soldier on the battlefield, and every soldier has the right and, rather, is obliged to provide proper medical care to his own in a timely manner. eh, colleague. in this case, it is guaranteed that the soldier will survive, that he will be taken to the domain, samba and so on. this means that everything should be provided for in the first aid kit, and pay attention to russia, let's speak frankly , it turned out to be not ready in this regard, because , uh, when they get on the battlefield. the first thing they take body armor from the enemy. yes, uh,

body armor and nato first aid kits as trophies and about that. he says, do not be shy, because a fool who understands that he is a fool. he's not stupid anymore. it seems to me that all parties to this conflict turned out to be unprepared by the ukrainian army, in fact, it no longer exists in the form in which she started a special military operation and was defeated. yes, yes, both those and those that it was a war or a special operation of the army, which had not fought for many years. he, that, you can just one figure as an example, it is typical. yes, there were a couple of hundred aircraft in the ukrainian army. yes, at the moment it has already been destroyed, there are more than 300, and they are still flying , it is clear that without the military assistance of the west, which accuses iran, belarus accuses anyone of complicity in participation, but at the same time they supply weapons like this without this military help, the war would have ended long ago. and you know marat, without which there would be no more effect. yes

, look, we are discussing this. these military details are all correct, everything is great. and this must be done. responsiveness and controllability - this is what our country has and is provided for. it is this controllability of the speed of reaction due to the fact that we have an effective management system, which is headed by the president. he is also the head of the country. he is also the commander-in-chief and the fact that we quickly see the experience. unfortunately, a difficult and not very good experience, which is military in ukraine, but we refract it to ourselves, and the most important thing that we do ourselves is the drones themselves. well, we send tanks to the russians to modernize the defensive country that we defend ourselves, we do this in order to protect ourselves. as you said, we from sergeevich inflict unacceptable damage on those who dare to attack. yes, and this is the moment. we

also need to understand, if you like, these are our belarusian management models. the one that shows itself in a crisis situation is very effective to object to what mara said to you one moment, i'll just finish, yes, this thought. uh, why is the president, uh, noticed that he consciously and defiantly shows these issues that can be publicly dealt with publicly absolutely right, because there is nothing to hide here hmm , you just need a clear understanding here clear understanding. everyone should mind their own business, the president, as the guarantor of the security of the state. now it solves those issues, whether it is the economy, food, military equipment, those questions that are urgent at this particular moment in the first place. well, what is that? here's another moment on armament that dmitry absolutely correctly said, we do it ourselves. why it is important to do it yourself, i will give you an example : the turks wanted to buy systems from the americans.

why didn't any such complex type system agree? 400 or a system such as the patriot can be disabled remotely, it can even detonate the ammunition by the supplier country. turkey put conditions before the americans that they should give a completely autonomous system, the americans refused here russia well, at least the turks believe. uh, he provided them with such a system, that is, you see, turkey also buys weapons from nato. these are also security issues for the russian federation , so when we talk about the localization of production. we have these issues of our national security. we have certain agreements and count on our allies. naturally. this is an absolutely sound unified defense policy. but we must count on ourselves, and here the issue is ammunition. not only systems. eh, let the ammunition itself. what the president was talking about, that we should produce our own missiles. and another very important point, it resonates with

what dmitry was talking about the management system, but also the psychological preparation of society, the mobilization of society, is not already a process. you understand that, again, we do not throw stones at the russian federation in any case. we respect russia, but we must take into account the mistakes that have been committed. unfortunately, russian society is in the right context for this military operation . was not prepared. everything follows the process. if you are already starting this military operation, then you will be ready to reserve already for some additional forces that you must connect. if it doesn’t work out in a fairly short period, in what conditions this operation began, we say a lot that it was a preventive measure, because it became known that ukraine was being taken away. ukraine is going to express some critical opinion. we must still take into account. tv viewers that the heads of state still have more information. here you can be smart for a long time. yes, sometimes they make a decision e not always bringing certain information to the public. i think, sometimes i think they sometimes listen to us and smile. here, an important factor takes

place in the policy of the belarusian state. look at how the country reacts to us when we saw that some incomprehensible actions were taking place there in the north in the west in the south we did what we did we immediately reacted with information , we began to prepare, the appropriate structures so that they are both psychologically and technologically and managerially ready for various kinds of provocations, so that they can respond and protect the sovereignty of independence. and in this regard, our society today. here, communicating on dialogue platforms in the form of ordinary people, it is ready, and it understands very well that incomprehensible actions are happening on our southern borders. uh, beyond the southern borders on the western borders of some terrorist groups

are being formed, but this comrade is also the answer. you look how they wrap up there in kiev . that is, we played for a warning. now we have shown the drunken ukrainian military staggering from the other side of the border so, what else can you say, who rides on his feet . most importantly, we eliminated the effect of surprise. well, maybe, yes. so i would like to ask oleg alexandrovich himself you have a huge army of people. what is the mood, that people are already prepared, i don’t mean for war, prepared for what is happening around us right now? i would like literally 30 seconds to react to the ideas that colleagues spoke about and talk about another type of readiness of our country, scientific and technological readiness, on purpose, probably, an operation just like other local conflicts that have been in the world have shown that modern wars are high-tech wars and without a proper level of technology development in the country, it

is impossible to conduct them. and here again, the operation in ukraine what showed uh, this is the role. uh, high technologies in vetka in target designation of target guidance very often the calculation goes literally for minutes. and if not for seconds, that is, it is necessary to induce e, to reveal the parasite. eh, until the enemy left this or that point, and therefore these are the actions that have been carried out in our country for years and decades, namely the preservation of the scientific base of the technological base for the creation of our own satellite constellation for the development of dual-use technology. all this ensures our security today. it can be deployed in the direction of military security. as for the moral and psychological state of society, then about him, of course, you can and should judge, at least we don’t see panic, we don’t

talk about preparations for war, but nevertheless people give themselves something in the fact that it’s restless on the borders, which is possible, and provocations and and so on, but it seems to me that, in general, the society of vot exactly is not in a panic mood. eh, people, but understand the true causes of the processes that occur, those tasks that put e, different parties. ah, in this conflict, they understand that, in principle, these processes have their own logic. and if we're right if we use this logic, then our country may be out of the hot phase, which includes information that comes from us from our colleagues. people reach. as far as i understand it, but i think that this work needs to be done and it is necessary to intensify work with labor collectives from the youth youth environment. and now our experience shows that there is a request for this and to relax. in this sense, it is impossible, what they say? here we are, we work in the

media, but somewhere else this work is still not enough. these are next said about the war. and alexander lukashenko does not believe alexander's quotes from squirrels. perhaps, at the beginning of the third world war, but it emphasizes that everything must be feared and foreseen, well, who today can say that it does not break out? third world war? we are closer than ever to her. well, i don't believe that there will be a third world war, because the danger is that the third world war will lead to the destruction of everyone and everything. well, who wants to save today, the head of state summed up that belarus, uh, continues remain a donor of stability. there will always be any interview of the head of state . note. he always says that sooner or later we will sit down at the negotiating table . and then let's find in mind. let's start each other. uh, throw accusations. you need to sit down sooner or later at the negotiating table, the sooner the better and find they will need negotiations. yes

, negotiations can only be forced as soon as one of the parties realizes that the damage from non-participation. uh, the negotiations would be disastrous. she's going to negotiate. or forced, or the parties understand that mutual damage will be a good program discussed the words of foreign minister makei, who said that after two meetings they were ready to sign an agreement. ukraine and russia did not come to them. they came to the next meeting. they said the ukrainian side said that we would return to sign, shook hands and didn’t and didn’t come anymore and just look at what we are talking about most often now, yes, we write articles on the air in the newspaper on social networks, what are we discussing? yes, at the level of experts at the level of some leaders. my opinion is that we are talking about the fact that we understand that we do not want war. yes, this is ours, if only there was no war. today, it acquires something else, not everyday, like a proverb, but a level, let's say. so they are able to consolidate society as a whole, not

some part of it as a whole. and what is the most important thing in our country. this is the desire to ensure that there is no war here and there is peace; it completely coincides with the aspiration of our leadership and state power, and here is this unification. these two forces gives a very good effect, in fact, because look, today we can say that the entire ukrainian society does not want to fight. and even more so the power. well, it’s unlikely that we can’t say the same about russia either, but in belarus this is a mentality formed, yes, by years of history, everything came together here, yes, it allows us in some way, huh? but to think about it and behave in such a way that we are not drawn, god forbid, into this military funnel of hot hostilities. well, if i may, yes, here's one moment that i liked. eh, about the ukrainians. uh, how do ukrainians feel about the war, and how do belarusians feel about the war? yes

, we can remember a specific figure, but 700,000 ukrainians passed through a, then 700,000, and the majority went there voluntarily, if not all of them specifically went to kill their fellow tribesmen really, because only because they consider it safe, because they shelled peaceful cities in first of all, for the moment, what concerns the belarusians. uh, i liked it there, uh, a quote from a girl on the facebook page who said about the fact that we do not want a war, but then our partisan methods will surely follow. well, in a free translation, yes, our partisan methods for someone will be discoveries to them. although they were always like this at the moment, i would like to pay attention to why we must consolidate society should, firstly, that the president is designated not be afraid to speak the truth and inform society about real threats. this is also a unifying factor. believe me.

from the special services there is a conditional mi-6 colonel or he knows perfectly well the cia that the president in belarus in the twentieth year absolutely won. this means that the vast majority of belarusians are for the president for a normal peaceful life. no need. us this rotten. west we were ready to trade, if you don't want to get by, but at the same time, this means that if they come here to spare us, they definitely won't. they spare their ukrainians, who allegedly were with them. they will not spare the poles why should they spare the belarusians in this? i'm just saying that if we are every one for 2 the illusion has not yet lost the year, and we constantly see every day against the background of the door that there are still such people. unfortunately, there are enough who believe that if you put an idiot as the head of the country or a clown, yes, general prosperity will immediately come. yes , bullshit, mares, understand. this i am already addressing to

those who watch this program, those who will come here, and we will definitely not be thinking. and we will only be thought by the president who has preserved this country today and that is why we will unite. we should already at least because to the instinct of self-preservation. uh-huh , this word worked well for me. this is a very important topic. listen, but, uh, unfortunately, our individual experts, uh, who are also present in belarus and uh, there are such active russian supporters. they comment on such military participation in belarus, they say that belarus should get involved, but i want to express the point of view that you are the main beneficiary of the fact that these 28,000 m² will be in the zone of socio-political stability and not participating in a military conflict - this is the russian federation and belarus for russia, this is even more beneficial, because what it

seeks in principle. for russia in ukraine , this is to remove a threat from its borders. yes, but to push back these, let's say, threatening, e, potential attacks from nato in belarus, this is 100% guaranteed, we are of high quality. we are covering the western borders of the russian federation, we are ensuring social and political stability here, while russia has the opportunity to use our territory within the framework of an agreement within the framework of an agreement of a union state. russia has the right to. uh, carry out appropriate manners. and we provide assistance in the rear, that is, belarus gives everything russian for the russian federation necessary for their military operation to be successful and for russia, first of all, for russia, any involvement of belarus in the conflict is not beneficial, therefore, i believe that the russian leadership . it is absolutely not interested. but western agents of influence and various politicians

are speculating on this topic, trying to undermine the peace of our society, because the president repeatedly said, calm down in your workplace, you want peace, work efficiently . do your job and there will be peace. you need to hear the president and understand that belarus is not planning to participate. here's just your thought, how would you bring vadim thank you e. it's just that nato is interested in creating a problem for russia near smolensk. yes, yes, as it is. and please tell me, uh. i've been thinking lately. here we are talking around these, there is a lot of reasoning, and dugin prompted this thought you probably saw him come, but we don’t think that he, too, probably talked about this, that here we are somewhere near this national idea now and, uh, we are spinning around. uh, idea and ideology. uh, our defenses, what is it? this is the defense of sovereignty. that

's enough. here it is, well, for sure, we are talking about this somewhere. yes, not a wise person, because a person who's here personally when i got acquainted with. i was a little shocked when a person translates automatically from eight languages, you see, he kicked out translators and says, you are not a philosophy, the main category is the correct category to translate the wrong meaning and for him here is the word identity. here you are belarusian. you are russian , you are ukrainian, you are latvian, or that is, the fields are very important . yes, this is not true of the category of the russian world, he is a follower of the eurasianist, where in our sick imagination there are slavs and germans. that is, he is maximally pluralistic in this regard, and you look, he understands

the essence of the west here is his andrey bernard levy when he was invited by dugin west to discuss why he was chosen? this is not a court philosopher, as many in the west think, this is a philosopher quite difficult for the russian authorities, because he is a philosopher who has his own opinion and can say impartial. and this was in 14-15. the departments were expelled. yes, in the end, despite the other side. you look how scrupulous he is about belarus. i remember when i talked to him, he told me directly. do you have that socio-economic the model that we dream about in russia, it was 2009, if it doesn’t fulfill, uh, memory, he understands belarus very very well in this respect, because he lacks belarusian belarus inside russia and the fact that the president belarus met with him. in my opinion. it generally

writes philosophers, as they say. yes, the ideology of the state is an ideology in general, a system. well, i'll finish. and uh, the president just wanted to see the image of the future to come over after the conflict. after that, where will we be, in what situation, what should we build in this system, ivan mikhailovich i would like to develop these ideas somewhat in conversation there as well. at least due to the fact that i saw the resident and alexander dugin, there was such a topic that the ideology is not and are not created by order, there were unsuccessful attempts in russia , uh, even under yeltsin. well, we had the development of the ideology of the belarusian statehood. i 'll tell you straight, she's not fully. eh, it came true. although many positions they are quite interested in constructive ones to be preserved and developed. but here, uh, and there such an idea was voiced that the ideology, they are born life. they must mature from the depths of society, and then it will become a force that will

take possession of the masses and lead these masses along the path of upward development. and it seems to me that now we are just at that historical point when this idea is really already maturing. and we, perhaps , have not even fully reflected on this. and we have already created it and laid it down just to describe it, how many positions to realize the constitution, namely this, and traditionalism and conservatism are cleverly understood, protection from traditional family values historical memory, and national cultural identity is all that today, from my point of view, is quite. it can be the basis of our ideology, and i will say more, it can become an ideology that will become attractive to all the healthy forces in the world who, uh, who are simply horrified by the spiritual and other depravity that is being imposed on them in their countries. i'm talking about the loss of el, and the loss of the family, the loss of the homeland, and so on. and we, on the contrary, keep it. and now, uh, i think that now,

if our intellectuals should show their efforts, diligence, we can well create such an ideology that will shoot not only with us in a good way, but if we don’t ask for this, here are the values, this is the first reason for this, there is only one important thing, of course, yes, smart people philosophers cannot exist without them. eh, let 's just say moving forward. there are predictions in some, but in a conversation with others. another thought is that if this does not fall and is not accepted by people, then this ideology will have to go, then there will be no problems, then there will be no problems. do you understand? what do i want to say? here we recalled in the last program what the president said in no other program, there 5 10 2 years ago he dosed yes, he predicted somewhere else, but the most important

question that he asked himself and society. yes, where is our place in this new, changing or already changed world, and this meeting. it seems to me, but for the president it was interesting from the point of view of a possible answer to this question, where is our place for belarus of belarusians, in principle, a compact country of a small nation, yes, on a global scale. as we will see ourselves in 5-7, maybe 20 years? i bought called my undercoat posad international. but i would like to point out one important thing. here is the president when he was talking about prices. basically, he formulated this idea of ​​justice. but yes. it is they who were not born today in belarus, which is the nerve for belarus for the belarusian person of the belarusian state of the belarusian society, and our belarusian development model is too idealistic in the 21st century, which is very

important. uh, to others, then gave an interview small. yes, following the results of this meeting, and there he outlined this thing, which, perhaps , has not gone very well, yet. he himself admitted that the president very clearly shares and agreed with others that there is a russian idea, there is a belarusian idea, and we remember, yes, on september 17, the speech of the president. well , there was no belarus. previously, but now it exists, if it is necessary to reckon with it and it’s normal, when a country with which it is necessary to reckon with has its own idea, the most important thing that does not contradict the normal relationship countries among themselves. why is there russian and belarusian, and is this normal? because when i now indicate, why can we talk, while there is no idea and ideology. no, i just absolutely agree that the things laid down in the constitution that can and should be used are already a germ or bonds on which the belarusian ideology should be based. so we remember.

what was the nazi ideology of the ukrainian regime of the last 8 years, yes, ukraine under the soul, yes to the muscovite to the gilyak, who founded the speech that this is an ideology against confrontation absolutely. yes. most importantly, it may not even be minds. maybe not even the philosophers and ideologists who are there from the state. maybe even some kid who is 20 years old or younger there will even change, yes, but he will clearly formulate these bonds and be able to combine these bonds into digestible , understandable slogans accepted by society, which will become this basis, you know, because in my opinion there is not enough. sometimes just elementary things combine beautifully. if you remember, i would many, many times in this studio about the national idea of ​​ideology.

he said that i was very afraid of this moment when it would come, because it seemed to me that it could come only when there was some big trouble. uh, it can happen in the country practice shows. uh, what is it with our neighbors, uh, the ideology acquired it, it was formed in some ugly, in ugly hours. what is it because ukraine is russophobia? this is the extreme nationalism of the baltic states, russophobia is a struggle. i am very happy to support absolutely you. yes, this is your cool music, that these times have come hard times. we are approaching shaping to formulating our dialogue. and it is creative all the same, we are not, we are not talking about the fact that we are against someone in the belarusian word in the belarusian language there is a unique word humanism. yes? this is humanely humanistically decent. of course not, yes, in one word. can be translated. and you can translate descriptively , do it the way people will accept hmm, how they will accept it in

society, don’t do these two things against whom, firstly, marat and i talked literally the other day and we talked like this, like, we talked even before the broadcast . uh, i think this is, by the way, he came up with this idea. i absolutely agree with him. so i won't steal. here, and the essence of the question is that he says correctly that an understandable idea is understood, and it’s not even very important whether it will be a team or some group of people, authorities and other political scientists, but we have a leader who can then authoritatively voice this idea very important from whose mouth. it will be an idea to express your zone and you will formulate a person who can then bring this idea to the masses. we can we should take advantage of the historical moment and the second moment about the justice of many. here. uh, lukashenka thinks about something all justice. actually in the economy. there is no such term. uh, understanding that there is efficiency, profit and other things, listen. and

these are security issues. we are all in the same boat. and now the most dangerous revolutions are not those that were in the twentieth year. it was a bourgeois revolution. it was a revolution of people with unhealthy political ambitions, inspired by the secret services of foreign states. but when it comes to you, a social revolution based on social injustice, when some see that some have a rebellion. yes, and this is the moment, therefore this is the question of justice, lukashenka actually saves wealthy people, because if there are people who have something and quite good assets here in belarus. they will not bear the necessary social responsibility to the people. tomorrow they are with the people. here he is in this one emphasize that we have such successful people. this is not just an inflated bubble or oligarchs who accidentally took everything,

grabbed a television channel and became an accomplished person who did business on his own, and this is the essence of justice. if you want to know how to work, work platinology, please. but if you stole, if you deceived in such a context, how does it happen? especially in ukraine it was i gave an example. this is the circle in which i will give you an example. i would say, the man who was. here in ukraine so in the days of yanukovych, the prosecutor of the region came to him, and the main authority in the region by car and asked a question. who will you pay? you understand the state the country was in when the prosecutor arrives in the same car with authority and asks the question will you pay the thieves or the prosecutor's office the only moment, because i was quoted here. yes, i'm still concretizing, in fact. uh, the president doesn't just talk, can push the idea. we talked about, uh, we judge by aleksandrovich that we have a personality that can not only to formulate, but also to ensure yes

, to ensure that this ideology is implemented if it lies on the soul hmm because one thing is stuffing, and then the grass is not, and another thing when you have the strength, authority and support sufficient to make it really became 100% in demand. ugu and here i here now thought, and on justice. we have already begun to delve into the canopy a little bit, that's all the belarusian people's assembly. well, what is the injustice from the president of the trolley bus driver in one e-hall? yes, it is clear that the solution will be be taken collectively, but nonetheless british british parliament drivers of, uh, red double-decker buses sit and decide whether or not. here , justice is multidimensional, if we are talking about ourselves in the belarusian people's assembly. this is historical justice, but that is, but the actualization of those forms of democracy that have developed from our history have proven themselves. and we are talking about stripes not just do we understand, what if the

cathedrals and so on, that is, these forms of our e history were at some stage they were set aside. although, well, in soviet times there were congresses. uh, people's deputies, for example, and so on quite right, and now the belarusian people's assembly, which has been working since 1995, yes, but it did not have a constitutional status. now it has been given to him. this status and we are talking about the fact that we are moving in line with our history, that is, historical justice. we are talking about the social justice of the representation of all social groups of the strata of society, at the entire belarusian people's assembly. we are talking about legal justice on the subordination of public authorities to the people. as it is written in the constitution, thus, from my point of view, in the belarusian people's assembly. it fully meets both the principle of justice and the principle of the people of power, and therefore, it seems to me, this is a major acquisition of our state society that the entire belarusian people's assembly receives a

constitutional status and, uh, a new sound in our lion's share of representatives of the belarusian people's assemblies will be most what exactly, if deputies elected by the people, deputies are people representatives of the authorities and the civil region. yes, look, but remember how it used to be there 12-15 years ago. uh, the whole world in quotation marks laughed at the belarusian economic model. yes, what did you come up with there, it won’t work, you regulate prices there, why did they all come to the belarusian economic model today? yes , they use them. today we have the same thing, we can say about the belarusian political model. after all, we are doing this vns, that is, the people have already approved this constitution is valid. it is now being made into a law that will allow it to be implemented. this is the constitutional norm. maybe this is our belarusian political

model that will work in our society in our country. uh, she showed her effectiveness. it's in the ninety-fifth year . here's the meeting. the first saved the country. it was such a consolidating, stabilizing event in the political life of society, and then it turned out to develop. why shouldn't we use our own experience? after all, this is our experience. yes, you know, of course, they are all such good fellows. yes, of course, i'm sorry, and the president said today at the training ground there that there is no need to copy from anyone. he said this to the participants yesterday at the meeting. do it for yourself. for us for the country, these laws, you understand, they are good when in the comfort zone it is good when they are there, how many now there are 52 countries against russia. this same thing has been happening against us for 30 years only in a hybrid form. uh, and what do they blame the economy for, they carried away the economy, not the market starts the price of it is regulated is

limited to access to certain media to the venues and the state of you, not everyone is watching, not not a heterogeneous mass in one direction. and when they were pressed down, when they had problems with just energy sources that came from e russia, a special military operation began, what they did with prices froze , e, prices, what they did with objectionable media. not only did they close the fine, it introduces criminal liability, they are brought to justice for cooperation with e. so amy what they do, what they have in power. just try to open your mouth, what you need to establish peace is not just to support russia, the world needs to be established in the donbass , you will fly out like a cork, the right-wing leader of the italian party, who will probably become prime minister. she said that not a single person who has at least some doubts about the fact that, according to the policy that the european garden is pursuing, will never get into the new right-wing government in their life. you

quoted such a feeling of modern leader, or leader somewhere in the thirties of some european country. yes, this question immediately arises, yes, but this is the problem the problem of freedom in the west today is very, very deep, in this respect we are actually such an island, stability and real freedom when people remember when this coronavirus was, yes, everyone was forced there in the west, they almost wore gas masks on a daily basis, they rested, then these gay parades of imposing some incomprehensible values. people came here to rest and now people come here to relax. we have opened a visa-free regime for the baltic states for poland, people come. why are they resting, they are resting from this information dictatorship that is coming to them, that is, they say, you should have such a point

of view. you must react. so you must like it. and if you don't like it, then we'll put you somewhere in a certain gta. this is at best, therefore, in this respect, belarus is not just a source and an island of stability in eastern europe, we are also an island of freedom, i’m not afraid, i still think, here uh, half giggled. now after your words, but it will pass. wait a little more time has passed time has not yet been chuckled. i'll tell them. that's what's going on with my colleagues, friends of the polish sejm, who said they won't vote for sanctions. uh-huh it came to them, and he them, uh, deprived of their parliamentary immunity and i doubt it today. it's just that a criminal case is a more well-known dictatorial totalitarian country here for me not a surprise. by the way, if possible. here i am, uh, poland continued the topic a wonderful article appeared this week and money is political. e, there is such a publication, zelensky sold ukraine to the ruling ones and in poland

such a regime with belarus will not happen e write polish observers. hanna kramer uh, peace is trying to take away his so-called lands, that is, part of ukraine and belarus. to build his own empire. it is always interesting when they write it. uh, local political commentator and local journalists - this is for the tv viewers. for those who still doubt. we've been to poland, we know what they have sentiments about our protected lands. they sleep and see and do not hide it. well, here is what the ukrainian political elite will write. uh, piece by piece sold ukraine a letter so that warsaw would refute the interests of ukrainians in the international arena and provide financial military support. vso, well, we are talking about the fact that he put out sinking and any methods are good. as a result, zelensky passed a law according to which the poles will be the only foreigners. whose whose legal status will be similar to the citizens of ukraine is the main point, about which the polish ukrainian representatives are silent. this is that the citizens of poland

will be able not only to conduct business in ukraine without restrictions, but also to participate in the election campaign and work in government bodies, moreover, according to some reports , it is planned to integrate the law enforcement systems of both countries, what will be the last? the facts of the restoration of historical polish lands is when zelensky leaves the land, he sells the country in exchange for help. and if you mirror it, then it will turn out see how many almost 40 million new ukrainians appeared in ukraine and how much territory right up to germany you understand such a rule, the second part about belarus to belarus becomes a bone in the throat for piz members and what ruins all plans to create a maritime empire i think that the most important reason that the belarusians are on the side of moscow are the fact that in 2020 the polish secret services , under the leadership of president duda and prime minister marowiecki, tried to carry out a coup d'état. it is no secret in this country that the polish government

financed protests in minsk and other cities, as well as the belarusian position through the telegram messenger channel e, led the activities of terrorists, she writes in the article , in addition, in our country, the kachinsky gang created the so-called. banners of the goal of uniting belarusian nationalists for physical tactical special and other types of training for the active participation of the coup attempt in belarus, the aggressive action of law and justice forced the belarusians to form a joint regional grouping russian and belarusian troops and strengthen the nuclear regime in belarus well, the conclusion is that i can draw only one from this. uh, zelinsky is on trial for betraying the ukrainian people. well, duda-smoretsky, accomplices of terrorists , can draw these conclusions absolutely correctly, but first. you see, this idea from the sea, to the sea is absolutely impossible without occupation on the territory of belarus, which is why they tried in the twentieth year. work actively here. this was promised to them, a prize for action to the united states of america, and they are considering the option of either military means

invasion directly in the event of a weakening of the political regime and e in russia and destabilization. there, the situation is hoped that belarus will not have a nuclear zoning officer, if there is no one in russia to control the nuclear one. danchik they can enter here. that's why they're amassing troops. they don't want a direct confrontation. it is unprofitable for them. eh, actually, here's what's going on. we must understand with you, they are shaking the situation, exhausting russia, well, washington and london are doing poland using it so that later without directly carrying out clashes shake up the regime and, accordingly, already, uh, arrange below, between strife here in the region. this is what they are trying to achieve the second moment. poland is being deceived, poland was presented to them with such a beautiful candy wrapper. yes, but the filling is poisonous. this is the concept from maybe it's always like this americans are very good at selling some concept ideas. in fact, poland is being used. here they built a wonderful infrastructure in order to transfer troops, but it

is considered as a shock fist. primarily they understand that the old world does not always want to pour a mug, so to speak. and here you are, here you are, and therefore poland. unfortunately, their idea is mistaken, history has forgotten. this movement of borders always ends with the divisions of poland, poland is substituted, so they need to forget. this is what we wish peacefulness to the polish people of common sense. this poland is different things. yes, poland and from these ruling so-called party. here, i've been thinking for a very long time. but remember, here is balcerowicz, yes, why is he this carried out shock therapy and liquidated the polish economy, sold off the enterprise to foreigners. and, because the main task of the west was to create their own puppet forces to control poland when we say pis we say, but pis well, it's the americans. yes , when we say a civilian platform, and a civilian platform is brussels berlin paris someone that is, when we talk about poland, this is not a subject, but an object that

is used to incite. against, uh, their very interests. here, i will confirm your words. so, here you are approaching the shelf in the store. yes, and there are 200 different shampoos. wash away the different names, turn over and watch the proctor. n. gamble one company one firm. that is, when today you have counterparties in the form of a rival of these 52 states. basically. this is one firm controlled by the system. that's what for? that is why here i agree with dugin. here is the correct idea. he says that one cannot resist certain concepts without having one's own concept. it's very hard not to offer an idea. and you see, this is what you were talking about about these gay pride parades, there are no other devices there anymore, because the gay months, that is, the whole month should not be harder, every european at once belarusians. understood in a month from them. this is the beginning of the sale of a halyard of imitators on the shelves of children's stores, you understand, that is, what it has come to, that is, a month with them, that is, this asexual asexual, that is, complete no, then a man

of the world for which a man of the world, because a man of the world . don't sleepy your land because he's manageable. yes, any property. i'm a man of the world. and why should i fight for the enterprise to be under the control of my state? i konspolit i'm on with a laptop and how they like to talk with a laptop. you will leave all the agents of influence, because the cosmopolitan will not go to war, that now he will run the ugly georgian pass, the concept, including, it seems to me that this can be resisted successfully vladimir it seems to me that peter said a very important thing that we need to pay attention to and look from the point of view that this is for us, and we are a complete threat from this. why because you said that one party is american and the second platform is european, that we get the polish people and the polish army as a potential proxy soldier, which will be a proxy soldier today. ukrainian. tomorrow it may be a pole who does not really want to fight. well, he will have to force him to

his own political elites, with whom is he? to fight with whom the poles fought all the way with russia with the russians through the territory they went through our and this is what should concern us and excite us more than anything else. i also want to draw attention to the fact that we have not yet worked out e. this is the meaning of the difference between ukraine and belarus, why? for example, ukrainians quite easily accept this idea, and not just a capture. well, somewhere, maybe the capture will no longer be worse for ukrainians, probably the western lands, while belarus is categorically against it, and i see here one of the possible answers is that we have preserved historical memory and we, uh, in society. there is also an understanding that took place in the belarusian lands of the west. uh, until the thirty-nine year. especially in western belarus it is not necessary to go far. my grandmother lived for the so -called polish hour in my family. there is a good understanding of what processes took place in her village, in particular in western belarus as a whole. and this is the preservation of historical

memory through the obstruction of generations. through historical science, which gives knowledge that it was our president. he quite rightly said that it was, and scorching, and catholicism is for everyone. yes. this is the nazi of the belarusian people, the destruction of what we today call belarusianness, and until the thirty-ninth year, according to the results of the riga treaty, and earlier as part of the commonwealth, and now, this is our historical memory, the preservation of historical memory. now we are being given a very, uh, good service. well, the wrong word does not serve as a basis for a true understanding of what was and what could be, if western belarus somehow leaves belarus as a whole, it will not be like belarus as such, what is their historical memory of their textbooks. right now the textbooks in the east are schoolchildren. it says that the soviet union occupied. uh, ukraine mocked her, what could be? even if with ours, by the way, vadim said well that all the shampoo bottles on the shelf are

different, in fact, you open the usa there. damn it , uh, weeks, but glinka confirmed this week. in general, there is no need to make up what he said, saw, yes, uh, the world cannot be left without leadership. absolutely, that is, blinkin called for admitted that the us runs the world. and they try. uh, this is uh continue so that it is. let's listen. from our point of view, this is a competition for what will happen after the post-cold war period. whose values ​​will be reflected for the united states the choice is if we do not participate in the organization, if we do not occupy a leadership role, this means one of the two it is occupied by someone else, perhaps china is not in the key that fully coincides with our interests and values, or even worse, no one occupies then you get a vacuum, which can fill the negative elements with their headland, it is necessary to settle before , probably, with, synchronously, the speech

of the president in astana, where he said that the united states is not coping and the regulators failed in the 90s of the nineties, then the leading role. uh, the united states was perceived in general, well, quite positively in the world, because, well, it seemed that they really would provide progress for the implementation of these democratic values ​​and so on, but their mentality on the one hand messianic mentality. he says that we must be leaders, we must be the leading force, and on the other hand, the colonial, connected e with each other led to the fact that they squandered this symbolic capital of theirs in just a few decades of decades today, the united states for any normal person. this is a symbol of what the war of cynicism and double standards is one thing to stand at the head of the world to be the richest power, another thing to indicate to whom . see what the us is doing with the european union destroyed economic competitors.

today we uh had a pleasure to hold a conference at the ministry of economics. the main theme for the industrialization of the european output. production capital output is the destruction of german french industry, that is, we are dealing with a real international geopolitical parasite. history of mankind. unfortunately. here we are looking at it does not teach cyclicity. nothing. look how much empire there was, right? and as soon as the empires broke away from reality , the roman empire was also due to the fact that too strong expansion, the inability to control them, they fell apart and the smartest step would be for the united states not to be, uh, the global uh observer of the world, yes, the metropolis, leave the global leader, but the leader, he knows how to see a number of strong ones, he knows how to delegate authority, he knows how to create. so zones where comfort is our concept. this is the difference between the concept of american this is the concept of global dominance and the

concept that the shanghai group proposes the concept of global foliage, that is, there are strong people nearby, but this did not happen in one. well, we want them to come to me. how many times did he say he doesn’t speak russian on his air. i say, can i decide, but i don’t say, but in the second year with ports, because at least they will speak russian at least in what, uh, they will. to behave as long as they can afford it , as long as they can divide and rule, using the contradictions within the shanghai group within the framework of those agreements that we even have within the framework of a union state within the framework of the eurasian union, the csto and so on. they are trying on at well, thank god within the framework of the union state. we do not have such contradictions that could someday break the alliance with russia for the whites, thank god, but now they are trying to stretch the broader structures and integration a little. what did lukashenka say, so many smiled at one

time, but there will be back-to-back meetings. he said this within the framework of the union state. we are already standing. ah and within dc spoke. you understand in due time, unfortunately, not everyone heard in time, therefore, you understand, here is our the concept of being more human, loving, yes more from a point of view. that's pragmatism, and yes, human-love, our concept will be great. uh, let's say the number of countries accepted, so this gives hope for that. that we have a chance that our concept will win this is the essence, because their concept of a person is hateful, this is the whole ideology that we are talking about, after all, they are talking about efficiency. today, the effectiveness lies in the fact that it reduces the population. that is why biolaboratories, which are already genetically looks who will be ill with viruses goes. i already talked about this on the air. automation of the means of production will be superfluous, the population will no longer need a particularly low-skilled workforce in certain areas, and today they are slowly introducing it. eh, generally in the public consciousness admissibility. you

blame the experiment. yes? uh, that in certain social groups, the possibility was discussed, uh, of killing people, including the use of their organs and others for the purposes, so to speak, of the survival of more significant social groups. do you understand what concepts they try out in society, so our concept is more human, loved more sensible and we have every chance if we learn. eh, to smooth over with slivore to make concessions to each other, you win in this fight, one moment i want to make a little positive for us. at least. ah. that's the moment when we realized e we are with our main ally, a first of all, our main ally. yes, i understood that we need to talk, but with the other side on equal terms, as soon as we finally came to this, then about what the president always said talk like equals we'll achieve more. we have begun to get a normal result of the union

state programs that are implemented by the trade for the people and even in these difficult conditions, when the whole world is rolling. sorry where are we? uh, here, as long as i feel fine, let's be direct. so in this regard, there is hope that since the americans started literally. they themselves put it this way, uh, feel like a hammer, and around only nails, yes, including the european union how do you say 500 million correctly? the man is nobody excite. here they are. once they started to feel like a hammer. all other nails. is there really any hope that this is a collapse? well, for them there is hope that the other side, that is, the asian region, will begin to understand. these kinds of mistakes are not allowed. they seem to me that they are here. sometimes i look at the european union, they repeat the mistakes of the soviet union, and this reassures me. here is the question of serbia, we know that serbia is fighting

hungary as best it can, although it is very difficult for it to be surrounded by energy carriers by sanctions and so on along with branches, and uh, boys and so on. well, he's already spoken quite harshly about this a few times, and here's his fresh speech about yes, he's free in europe, real european freedom, let's listen. no one threatens me like alexander, they openly threaten our entire country and its existence. i just want you to know this and this is the first time i'm saying it. it's so open nothing is enough. they say the problem is the refugees. no problems. let's stop the visa-free regime. we'll solve these problems, but it won't be enough. it it will not even be news that they demand sanctions, because they are hindered by the fact that there is one country that is clogged out of order and wants to have the right to free opinion. at the same time, it does not

threaten anyone and does not set foot on foreign land, but they were severely punished worse than iraq, afghanistan, because base kandahar was not separated from them. shoulder five or six days. now for them it serves as an occasion for us, like a moth to come out on all forms, and then with us will do. what russia is accused of and i repeat, if we imposed sanctions against russia tomorrow they would tell us for 3 days that we have become part of the european family of peoples, and then they would ask us to switch to the historical right side, and the true side of history is that what they indicate. yes, well, yes, everything is laid out. in general, it seems to me that here, uh, it can be noted. well, you know how hindsight is always smart, but it was clear even then. this today we have the fruit of the wrong historical city of the european choice. e. what is the attitude of the orthodox

slavic south slavic serbia has to the european union it was quite obvious that these countries would be there on second -class rights, which would always be pushed around in any situation. she does not place the cost here of her policy. so, in principle, today we see it. and when were we also convinced that we should go this way? we are speaking. and, if suddenly something is wrong, they will cut down everything for us. well here is the enterprise sale and so on, everyone was talking about. yes, no, it can't be. here we have a graphic image, in my opinion, inflation in countries. e of europe, if there is one, i ask, e, to display this graphics on the body, i want to be glad for our e, baltic. uh, the neighbors who sold their sovereignty for some gingerbread are now the main such russophobic belarusian force. so what, they got help from brussels, they helped their son, like they live on reserves on

some other grants and so on. well, soon 30% by the end of the year there will be more figures here. such old summer ones, because now i see more e in poland there is already inflation for september, i think it's over 17. a. secondly, the heating season has not begun, when it will begin there will be a question that inflation can go into a huge galloping form, because the price will increase, and the energy intensity of products increases, which means, uh, simply, uh, residents of the european union to face very, very strong challenges. we are stating the successful special military operations of the united states in europe. that is what they wanted. the european union did not, they achieved good results and are waiting for it. uh, when property is already flowing away, assets are flowing away states of the european union fall under even greater control of washington and now our

task is with you. here, the elections are already russia, we , uh, how to help, but russia has more resources than me, the elections in the usa must be influenced so that those forces come, the same republicans who say that they do not want to the extent that the operation is being funded now , the military in ukraine to finance this saint, that is, today we must be able to create problems, unfortunately, we ourselves state. today it is a fact that americans can, in order to create problems, must have opportunities to create. you know. perhaps if the party changes, which government in the states changes or their foreign policy does not change. we owe ourselves these problems. to create others that we don’t even have the right to voice on the air, and orban is so much heard now. but this is true, the last representatives of non-clown management in western europe, yes. well, there were adequate

representatives, yes, what i liked is that there are leaders there, whether there are strass. yes, as they say, you are not a joke, well, some say 44 days is a beautiful figure. she's great, really. you see, an interesting situation is happening, and this is the second case in recent times when an e-clown leaves politics. well , it means losing his post. the first one lasted about three years. if we are talking about johnson. yes, but he really is him and even his appearance. although it is believed that he was much smarter by an order of magnitude once, and she always tried to raise the price of someone. she tried to imitate the church, or she tried. plant, naturally, with her tank trips and manners to russia, but the question is, maybe we are a parade of uh , these clown rockfalls. uh, or

clone attacks, we will see further, because what is real now is what they say, uh, the lithuanian president is what the estonian minister of foreign affairs says about putin. and what they really do is these areas of terrorists. after all, all these things are what the scholtsy still, as they say, hold on to. really holding up. although completely. uh, germany from this pedestal on which he stood for decades. she is not cast out exclusively by his policies. and maybe this moment, it's coming now. i hope, and maybe the winter in this regard will give such uh, it will become catalysts. yes, but i would like to point out one thing to remember, let me be accused there. in that i pull an owl on the globe, but 2 years ago, two years ago with belarus, they wanted to do the same, they wanted to put a clown at the head. and

in reality, we would go through these stages now, and maybe even by accelerated methods, because about ukraine already as an example only the league of europe sergeyevich, according to the plans , you were not alive then your relatives dear you are very dear to me, by the way, demons, but the question is that. uh, don't think that this cup would have changed, because one way or another, one way or another, ukraine, what is happening is the loss of territory, already the collapse of the economy. long lost hundreds of thousands of people in the literal sense of the word. this is the fate of fate. we should have had 2 years ago. we had to become anti-russian, and this would have happened in that case and we would have started to fight already in this case, if the clone became the head or became the head of state, thank god that this did not happen. people, unfortunately, and

i have added it here you are predicting in belarus. i agree. so moreover, for five years i have just been sitting here. we predicted all this for ukraine simply until today, up to the smallest child. they giggled, hear, we were stars with you at all in the zamahar garbage dumps. we now let our headlines stand up with our forecasts , laugh in a sentence from what was said mara sergeevich uh, two words literally said that, uh, it means not the president, and here is the scum sergeyevich of clowns, then they change the procurators, who return the emperor. that is, these are fully controlled territories, therefore not presidents are procurators appointed by the metropolis. you know, it wouldn't be as funny as bitter why. because, unfortunately, western politics is so arranged, what decides it even these clowns put them on purpose to ward off people's hatred, but decides who are some gray corridors . there are lobbyists and they look here,

how long uh the uk party is in power. it's from the end of the 2000s. yes there, uh, how many prime ministers have changed? yes, and the party in power is washing its hands of everything, everything is fine. although the economy is going down. people are suffering and unemployment is rising. uh, devaluation is the lowest rate. there for 50 for 60 years. uh, pounds sterling, and no one is responsible. here is a lie that is a real system of political evasion of responsibility. we should give a standing ovation, really. here is the key word responsibility. yes, lukashenka is responsible for the fact that he makes before us before the people before himself. yes, he never relieved himself of this responsibility, and in principle, he does not seek to delegate it strongly, right? yes, we are right there.

the governors received additional powers, but they still bear responsibility for key aspects of the country's life support. and here the role of the individual in history, the role of the leader, is more important than ever to us, what they tried to instill in the last 25-30 years after the collapse of the soviet union that this is the democratic form, and we called it as the collective responsibility, that is, irresponsibility, the most universal model is not true if there is a person who copes and if there is a person who succeeds. this means that this person should be in control, but change managers, as in firms i do for what in order to yes at the end of our program. so you talked about the role of the individual. first, i will read the news to you, and then there

listen to an excerpt from the speech of a well- known person president of belarus scandal remember 2021 is about fonderlainen i corresponded with the head of the fizer regarding the purchase of a vaccine, instead of 15 50 euros. at the same time , she should have bought there for 19.50 details told this week. uh, quotes, from his e- tweet. this is clearly ursula von, as there, on a non- childish scale, she bought 4.6 billion dos covid vaccines from the phizer corporation from pharm corporation for 71 billion euros. this is 10 to vaccines for each citizen. the eu captures the spirit of that scale, well, it's clear, she's a gynecologist and the head of some kind of european commission, and now a representative of a large pharmacy, bright and bold.

the woman is not afraid of anything. europeans are at a loss. how much of this astronomical amount of euro dough, two smart people got the gynecologist of the prime minister of the european union , along with a spruce husband, who, by coincidence, works in a pharmacological company, not a cleaning lady. yes, here it is necessary to add not the first generation. the pedal is not the first generation. it’s a wonderful deal, how many billions are there. let’s listen to a fragment of alexander grigoryevich’s speech corona-psychosis literally tore the country’s europe into shreds instead of uniting efforts acted spontaneously chaotically tried to survive and escape one by one and spit on this european union and euro-atlantic unity. today, the coronavirus has become a controlled phenomenon for more than two years, and i tell you in this a while ago that it will have its own

billionaire penises all over the world, this is already a fact. significantly increased the state markedly increased the gap between the very rich and the rest of the population. the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. according to the davos forum, the largest profits were received by owners of the production of the it industry and pharmacology. now these are connected businesses , in other words, they drove everyone home. dali gadgets have replaced the reality of the meters of the universe, and are stuffed with drugs. is it the mafia that will give up trillions of its profits, and therefore it will continue to foment panic, and vaccines will become an element of big politics in the west, real vaccine wars have unfolded, the satellite recognizes that the xenopharma is wary at the same time,

imposing its own product, such as phase. but in fact they divide the markets and sort people. such is colonialism, the division into uh, those who have the right to life, who do not, but in this topic, uh, once again, uh, it seemed important to me, i remember this topic of huge corruption very well, although i was still then just a high school student how the soviet union collapsed, opposed what the soviet union was like a corrupt , rotten nomenklatura there, corroded by an honest state. uh, a europe where the bureaucracy is honest, where business simply would like to, yes, they can't give, give bribes and the like. well, this is one of destructive historical myths that were imposed, admittedly, they were imposed on soviet people, then on post-soviet people. today we see. eh, it is completely different that e corruption and other social pathologies in the

west in europe, america, they are an institution with a double light. simply and even in quotation marks learn to unwind learn no, but i mean that the scale is simple. years ago, a large and norwegian company organized an international event, which wanted to participate in this, went to the belarusian the same company and offered this part to refuse to participate in the auction so that the norwegians would double the price, earn themselves and share with the belarusians was e, you were shocked, to be honest, from the actions of our private european ones. e.