in this show, participants and viewers are waiting for tricky questions fermented milk drink from mare's milk, what is it called? and why are you whispering, you are hiding something from me two one of your answers. nobody watched the simpsons, very cool. then. come up with a city and call it intuition, the main erudition. it will definitely come in handy here. so this is the abduction of europe. this is how it looks to you. well, in some pictures, of course, it looks better, but what we have is amazing. this is the correct answer. in case of an incorrect answer. have to go setting. think well before you say it, and one more element is the tower at 99.9, how the dna test will not work, watch the intellectual entertainment project tower on belarus 24 tv channel. with

what baggage did we approach the centenary, what is today the national library of belarus is the largest in the country, we are the leading scientific institution in the field of library science , bibliography, and also the scientific coordinating center for the public libraries of our country today the library is the largest information socio-cultural center in the first place. er, of course, this is the largest repository of knowledge we store today with over ten and a half million different kinds of documents. these are books, newspapers, magazines, maps, posters, abstracts and dissertations, and other documents in 80 languages ​​of the world. today, our users have 17 spacious reading rooms that are equipped for studying all types of

documents in terms of their technical equipment. today, the library is not inferior, uh, leading libraries. e mira, e our complex of technological systems includes both scanning equipment and restoration equipment equipment. e for publishing today we publish on the basis of the library. uh, our publishing center publishes, uh, two scientific collections. we also have our own uh, library light magazine, which is celebrating its twenty-sixth anniversary this year. well , of course, it is impossible not to talk about our socio-cultural component based on the library. we are hosting today more than 220 events of various levels every year we hold more than 30 art and more than 150 book exhibitions. uh, the exhibition complex of the library. today is located on 3.500 m², which allows us to exhibit. e more than 600 works of art. and today in

the library. e function e, a children's room in which you can bring your child. when working with literature several times a week, we hold various activities with children and libraries. even just a birthday. e with a child. here. well and, of course, we have, uh, a museum. museum of the book, where you can get acquainted with the most valuable editions of the roots, which are stored in the library funds. well, today the library is probably the only institution in the country that includes a sports and recreation complex. uh, this and uh, a gym, uh, an area of ​​200 m² of modern equipment and even a sauna. well, how many books of documents are in the collections of the national library than the rich. we have a total fund of about 10.5 million documents, of course, uh, the pearl of our collection is the collection of rare manuscripts of speared documents, which we have more than 90,000

items. uh, most uh, earlier manuscripts that are for the web. these are the discoverers of the true sunnah arabic manuscript, which dates back to the 14th century. e, the most interesting and valuable edition of the manuscript of belarusian origin is the secret mystery or aristotle the mole, which dates from the end of xv to the beginning of the sixteenth centuries. uh, we have a library. uh, the most valuable thing we can offer is 10 editions of the bible and francis. ambulances, which formed the basis of the belarusian book printing. well, we also have the first lifetime editions of the classics of belarusian literature, yanka kupal, jacob kolas maxim badanovich and others. digitalization of the internet is not lost. interest in the printed book. in your opinion. as it seems to you, there is less reading, in fact, interest is not lost. uh, just a paper and printed book. there are advantages and disadvantages to a printed book as well.

she say. it evokes great emotions. it is more interesting to work with her and she contributes deeper assimilation of information, but electronic publications. it is more compact. she has the possibility of additional work with text. and our research shows that with age, our readers still prefer a paper book. presented today, the national library in digital format has become more of these digital readers today. if you can call them that, of course, the library. today. it's not just printed documents, we provide access to more than, uh, 100 databases. domestic and global manufacturers. uh, also the library produces information resources from its own. it must be said that today readers have a choice e along with working with printed documents. he e has the ability to access hundreds. uh, we are looking for the titles of modern

newspaper magazines, uh scientific articles. here you can get acquainted with the full texts of textbooks. e scientific publications. uh, that and legal literature, practically uh, all kinds of documents. we are available in both printed and electronic format. everything begins with the origins and traditions of the memory of our ancestors. preservation of the culture of belarusian rituals and crafts but the world is changing. changes generations views and creativity does not stand still. when people realize the value of traditions and understand where to move on, art takes on new

bright colors. hello greetings to all who are now with us attack the guests of today's edition of the event lot. so let's not waste time, let's get started. that 's why on the eve of an interesting meeting between alexander lukashenko and alexander dugin, the famous russian philosopher. let's remember one of the fragments once i remember too roughly i will say giggling in russia, some said that the time will come. it was said up to a year or two ago, something in the nineteenth-twentieth year, when putin and i would have to stand back to back to shoot back the whole chest. how is it? that what we see today is exactly what

we are going today, therefore, we need to stay close to each other. you don't have to try. eh, somehow get around each other. no need. there is something to share like our common victory in the great patriotic war. everything is clear, roles. eh, the story was distributed a long time ago, and a person like you analyzing events in the form of reality, eh, will do. i think the correct conclusion. and not only this is my interest, but the interests of belarus and russia are the interests of the russian belarusian people of all russians and belarusians, in general, this president does not have simple meetings. especially those that take place in public. but andrey evgenievich what do you think about what happened and what was it about first of all, this meeting immediately came to mind. e, wonderful bulgakov's novel master margarita, when you remember, played chess at woland's and there was such a fra. why are chess magazines of

the world better, they would give everything to print the course of this game, so i’m sure that the best political science philosophical ideological magazines in the world would give a lot, if not everything, in order to publish, what were these 2 hours of talk. you see, alexander galich. dugin - it's not easy, there a political scientist is a political strategist, even a political analyst is a philosopher who conceptually and scientifically substantiated a different another conservative, yes right, but a different way of development of civilization. he did not take only the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long review interviews with him, he explained the school of political realism in the usa, the engineer's brush explained who these people were? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will politics develop further here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. after all, it

was not by chance that during this interview that yes, we have not formulated an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has a clear concept of the ideology of the future, but there is still no slogan that can pick up people to lead him along, belarus is interesting and important, since we are on in fact, for the last quarter of a century we have been choosing a different social, sometimes we will stipulate the socialist path of development. and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation to lay under our nation-building, as long as it is largely groped by position president, by the way, an important point. look at us and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko about this. they said that the necessary dialogue does not exist in the form in which it would be sufficient to respond to the western dialogue that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but what's the difference? look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we

see, probably in the west, these new, let's say, globalist values ​​that break family values ​​that, well, common sense even break. and we see what tension is being created within society, and here, on the contrary, they are moving towards the fact that it is necessary to take the idea from the people themselves to develop it further. alexey and how are you? you know, when we, uh, now collide in general in uh in matters of confrontation. oh well, some say the collective west is the collective east first. we uh should be talking about opposing just the idea, yes, and even uh, the theory of propaganda, uh, which is a book on propaganda that arose after the first world war. it clearly stated that the key war does not matter in a war on the battlefield or a war in the military information space, it is always a war of ideas against ideas. and of course, now when a we see an aggravation. eh, now

this fight already. eh, all the latent confrontations turned into open ones, and the confrontation between us and the collective west, we need a single idea that united not just belarusians within itself, but united a large space. this is space. uh, it should end not only in russia, it should end. and then it should unite everything the eurasian space, plus, uh, pull up asia because, otherwise, the collective west with their uh, power, with their financial and economic capabilities, of course, can impose its surface. what idea with what now? if they don’t fight, then they oppose each other. the fact of the matter is that if philosophers sit and try to develop an idea, an idea is groped for, that is, there is only one opposition left to express it. yes , to the collective west, the idea is simple. this is

the idea of ​​e profit and e, net profit and seizure parts of the profits in all possible ways. what is our idea? here is the most. the important thing is to listen. i am, uh, a longtime original fan, uh, of both belarus and your course. i think i never doubted it, and even in the most difficult times there were difficult times between our states. with all my heart, with all my heart, with all my capabilities , i supported you and supported the line that you brought out and did not allow your state to be plundered. you didn't make the same mistakes that you and we made in the 1990s. now we fix it with such difficulty. and i just sincerely bow before your authority, before your courage before yours, and by the convinced steadfastness of the salvation of the belarusian people, the belarusian statehood. and that means ourselves means ours. that means our union

state and today we are just like you said, uh, with a shoulder back in the back more than us , everyone else ended up somewhere either in neutral positions or in opposite positions, and here we are standing and defending our slavic russian belarusian idea together - how is that watch for yourself. this is the confrontation between the idea and the meanings that were spoken about. yesterday, i fully agree with the previous ones with my colleagues and the upcoming ones. but i would like to give, when you say that we are trying to find ideas, but remember, there was the soviet union, when in the sixties. uh, colonialism collapsed and many african countries came to us and why they supported us, yes, and now they began to support us, let's say , because they saw that this world is more just, therefore, of course, the word justice. it is somewhat abstract, so i agree with alexei. what else is needed to work, what do we

invest in the concept of justice, but, in principle, when we speak for justice. and so even our confectionery factory expressed, no matter how it was. uh, so to speak, a marketing ploy, but nevertheless for justice and therefore, uh, when, uh, mr. dugin says that uh, so we are expressing the idea and the two of us. e, together, that is, two countries e, not only the two of us, because look we are supported by african country. let's remember when the leader spoke, mm, united there, what is it called? in general, it unites all african countries, and he said that we will never support the united states and sent me this speech. and that means he will support everything that happens. here, uh, so to speak, what russia is doing and, uh, belarus, so you can’t say that we are just the two of us, of course, it all depends on how it goes, how the operation in ukraine goes, so many fear that if there is a loss, then there will be a loss at

them, so they kind of quieted down, but in fact, and there are not two of us there are more of us. i think that this is a meeting, in general it is significant, it reflects tectonic shifts in the russian elite. actually not so long ago. well , dugin was considered marginal liberals. that is, he was pushed aside, er, far to the periphery of it, so to speak about government radio television experts and so on. in general, uh, by and large. they giggled at him , gloated that he was a man from the past, that his ideas remained in the last century and died, and now it turned out that in reality now happening. well, let's say it can be said about the conduct of the behavior of russian society. well , one thing can be said that the liberal part of the russian elite is losing its positions. she , uh, had to show her true face. and someone, indeed, as dugin said, turned out to be on the other side of the front, someone

turned out to be neutral. and so, in general, the patriotic part is gaining strength and now it is choosing the russian power above. in fact , she has no choice. it must rely on patriotic forces. i would add here counter-interest the president expressed his interest in meeting with alexander gelch. and i would fantasize about the interest of dugin himself to meet with the belarusian leader and for the belarusian president. this is really the way out of our ideas of the belarusian position on the broad traditionalist russian society and conveying the meaning, and not only russian, because dugin has been translated, if i'm not mistaken, into 50 languages ​​of the world and his conservative view of the world is conservative in the right sense, that is, conservative development, and do not stagnate, but he in demand all over the world. and here is alexander gelievich in several interviews that i recorded with him. he talked about it, belarus is important. by the fact that it

is trying to apply and work out a great theory, a beautiful harmonious theory, in practice, that is, belarus is trying to build a society of social justice, a society for developing its sovereignty in absolutely hostile conditions, it is trying in practice, which is very important to work out great philosophical ideas concepts. moreover, it is also important to understand what opposes us. here is the barrel let it slip. but this is really a theory of racism, a theory of superiority, when it is declared from a high rostrum that the european union and the liberal world as a whole. this is a flowering garden. and the rest of the jungle, that is, the thought of us, is perceived as monkeys from the jungle. this is repetition. uh, this absolutely russian nazi. uh, ideologies, white man supremacy, that 's uh, white's burden. yes, this is

concentrated racism that lives in this liberal elite. and by the way, alexander is fighting against this racism, let's just go to the thesis irina vasilievna said that it is very important to understand that we are not alone today. yes, in close combat. we are back to back, but there are a number of states that are carefully watching and worrying about our victory. and i would like to turn, of course, to the castana, which was rich these days and meet the accents that were voiced. we will inevitably turn to them for a long time to come in the capital of kazakhstan. i remember hosting the sixth among the key figures of this forum are bilateral meetings with the presidents of kazakhstan, turkey, the prime minister of pakistan, and, of course, communication on the sidelines is often no less important than, uh, the negotiations themselves. with the aggravation of the situation along the perimeter, i would not want this escalation to happen if let's stop the war and

agree. here is irina vasilievna, if you look even earlier, not so long ago it was samarkand shanghai, cooperation is hiding now, this is the meeting. and uh, the formation of the same brix, we heard that with reference to the president of south africa saudi arabia expresses desire to join. it's already completely different. what is called a palette, but if we return to this asian format. can we say that a dynamically new world order with the center in asia is being formed right before our eyes, of course, and in addition, do not forget that when we say that and not only we say, and everyone says that globalization has ordered live long. uh, i want to say that she ordered to live long in the format, as she was understood, the united states which means today day. she will go completely different. format in the format of regionalization of large regional macro-regions and what is happening here is e scos. eh, so i was going to.

uh, so what's going on here is this meeting, it shows that the configuration will be completely different. she will change. and what is typical, what will develop, and well as it shows. eh, statistics for us is developing at a very fast pace in asia a and, accordingly, asia has the greatest prospects. not even from a point of view. we will talk there, ideology. what ideology and etc. if you look at the economy, asia shows, well, an example, er, in development, it's not only china although china has a little bit. here , the pace is slowing down, mainly india, and all the neighboring countries have potential, even if today the pace may not be high enough. they have a very large potential, which is why we participate. here in these meetings in meetings we are, in general, a european state. we are in europe and by the way, this is the last meeting. uh, it's written in their bylaws that only an asian

state can become a member, then i think, how will we get there, but we are entering a union state, and through the union state we are very beautiful, we fit in, and many people laugh in this system that they say this is asians they say we are europeans and uh, so to speak, where are we going. we are going in the absolutely right direction, but because, apart from markets, and apart from that, what we will have and we now have. we are now cooperating with china sufficiently, but widely and deeply. this is our strategic partner that we will get more new partners that our markets need to expand, just yes, yes, i want to say that here we are, in general, ordinary people are watching our programs. these are not just markets, these are jobs , which means that jobs will remain . an asset both in our industry and in our agriculture. yes, uh, it means that the united states imposes sanctions

on e, china is connected with semiconductors in the transfer of certain technologies, but we must not forget that belarus was a republic during the soviet union, in which developed electronics, uh, we had good schools at that time. it is necessary to renew it is necessary to raise precisely this is the direction. you look at how many universities we have graduating specialists, e.g., related to electronics with programming. so this is a promising direction. we need to engage and maybe engage together. e with china uh-huh ah aleksey but uh hmm china after the congress will begin to change the configuration of e in asia, taking into account its scale in general, maybe even the global configuration or they here is a policy of cautious thoughtful development. they will continue, you know, if you read all the information that is now coming out, uh, about china, they are actually now

solving their internal problems. very strong in the first place, associated with uh, the decision-making system. and yes, we know that they have announced a campaign of the so-called tigers and flies to fight corruption at various levels. tigers are the highest composition. uh, flies are petty bribe-takers. yes, that is, in reality, we see that china is in preparation for a strong confrontation with the collective west, not even the united states of america with western corporations. he understands that at the beginning it is necessary to reorganize within himself for the struggle, so that there is no fifth, sixth and other columns. and this is what they are doing now with them, uh, quite a bit of time. they understand that at the end of 22 of the beginning of the twenty- third year, most likely about the distance from the global will go over to their side, everyone will already forget about ukraine, they will forget about russia

. most likely there will be not only taiwan , but an orientation towards forming any internal contradictions to cause protests within china, this is already being discussed. yes, the youth is pulling up, so and in reality, but the west and uh, american british corporations do not want to let go. uh, china in the free float before they are, as we have already discussed considered. china is like some kind of jungle where a enterprises should operate. there must be , uh, terrible ecology. uh, kids have to die of cancer and all. uh, the rest of them should be in the green economy, but now we see that over the past 10-15 years, china is doing in order to become an independent economic and financial player in the first place, and the west is trying to

prevent this regional, well, understandable for the collective west - this is such a collective. in general, the concept, but let's say regional opponents - who are they japan south korea yes, without uh, us support, these regional leaders do not know anything, that is, this is the united states and china, this is the main confrontation, that is, it is clear that the us will not fight openly. they will most likely pull up. oh, and japan will be pull up south korea australia uh, philippines perhaps yes, uh, confrontation, but uh , the subtlety of uh, chinese, perhaps wisdom is that china is proactive. they try to negotiate with everyone in advance. yes, not to confront, but to negotiate, and this tactics, uh, does not quite collide with the attempts of the west to impose a conflict, we are generally talking about these

new centers of power. they are not just necessary. they are already inevitable. because here andrey evgenievich remembered. now the barrel is really when the head of the european, diplomacy says that the eu is a wonderful garden all around. this is john or a barrel around in this jungle, you definitely see some enemies. you already know this is not a diplomat. this is rambo first blood, they say it with a smile, look at him the day before, he tried to justify himself and said that he did not want to offend anyone at all. ukraine is also the jungle, he told. yes, and the west also does not always happen, but as they say. the first impression cannot be made twice. well, here’s what’s getting worse, vladimir makeev, by the way, in astana, i want to remember this episode. he told an interesting correspondence that did not happen with one of his colleagues, as he said, vladimir makei and from one very distant country the size of belarus, i will quote means that this colleague wrote to our minister. as for the sanctions against belarus, russia, vladimir , it turns out that the third

secretary of the us embassy is under the most severe pressure on us, writing us instructions and forcing us to join one or another sanctions, forcing russia to take specific actions against belarus and other countries that support them are threatened that if you do not do so , your relatives will freeze your accounts in the united states. children will not be able to study in the united states of america. we even all your students left the usa, i myself am afraid that this is a gop-stop already with a barrel. it's just scary to say you don't have to drive. so far. maybe it's latin america let's look around the neighborhood. after all, we have recently observed the events in kazakhstan. after all, i think that their essence is that kazakhstan was shown their dependence on the west, because the main capital of the capitalists. let's just say that kazakhstan 's capital placed abroad is all exported there, not invested in the national economy, but exported there. in addition, the children of the highest elite of the

upper strata, kazakhstan study in the same way, therefore kazakhstan is very sensitive to pressure from the west, the same is true of kyrgyzstan and all the other countries of central asia, and even if we take the caucasus, then this is georgia armenia, that is we see that even we don’t have to travel far, and therefore and when we are surprised that our allies in the csto are not pursuing an allied policy. they are conducting joint exercises with the united states, in which top generals are present and work out unknown. what options for action this shows, how great the danger is in general, how great the danger is hidden, so to speak, for the time being, a threat, and one can understand this plan, that while russia is busy in ukraine for the time being. she defends our western outpost with belarus, then hot spots are preparing in the caucasus in central asia and so on. that is, there

are a lot of pitfalls here, and the policy should be very subtle, pragmatic, and at the same time, like the chinese, the policy is aimed at being ahead of the curve. yes, we should listen very carefully to european union and american diplomats. here is a colleague. e vladimir makei. uh, secretary of state blinkin. e, declared that the world can only be an american pak from an american, that is, in the world there can only be american dominance and power. and everything else chinese is bad for everyone. and it means that without power it is even worse. what does this mean, does barrel perceive e central europe asia africa lati? to america as the jungle and the united states is perceived as the jungle by the european union, it's just that there are first-class monkeys. they are a little closer and their diet is a little more. that's it, all the difference, so uh china uh. by the way, i advise everyone to have a

good english translation of president xi jinping's speech. very carefully. watch this performance. this is the highest aerobatics. eh, it's internal concentration. when e all are held, not just performances. this is a systematic work on the bugs. china sees its vulnerabilities. that said about semiconductors. but china has already invested approximately $40 billion equivalent in the development of its chip production in order not to depend on china much. i launched this project eight years ago. uh, according to the essay, the way not to be left alone, not to stay in the co. unfriendly states are building infrastructure that stretches to belarus and serbia uh, this is aerobatics in international politics. i think e and participation in belarus in all meetings that link the eurasian space are aimed precisely at

this. we have a deep vision of our development, and we do not rush about, as alexander dugin, by the way, also often talks about this. here is such a dashing liberalism, they say. we will buy everything up to such a cruel gold-chasing concentration. there , right down to the board, the mannerism e yes, and we have a slender, logical policy built in the national interests. let's really let's continue then. we started with her quite right with the idea of ​​meanings. here is diplomacy about how a new device is being formed, while this is a disorder, because it still resembles chaos, and in general , how it will end, here in our space. uh, this big operation, which is not limited, by the way, will only depend on how this new world order will be, but as far as our security is concerned. here is a more specific question. this is the regional group

union state. here we see that units are already actively deploying here, including the aviation component as military expert boris once again. here is how you see this step. well, as i said, this is a safety option. the thing is that there is one mechanized division. uh, in general, it cannot change the strategic situation , but it can reinforce the armed forces of belarus, which is now stretched all over. uh, so to speak, western perimeter western northwestern uh, we are like a balcony that hangs over strange nato and ukraine and if we take the number of our armed forces of real bayonets 45.000. if we take the length of the perimeter of this border, it is almost two and a half thousand there. we have three operational lines of command. this is northwestern western and now southwestern. and if we take our

45,000 and stretch it, we'll smear it. it will turn out that it is impossible to securely close it along this border, so now, of course, the main efforts are being made. uh, this is to the border and there the troops are covering behind the back of the border guards and so on. but uh, the president warned that this greatest danger from poland could be hidden, pushed back in time, but there is the greatest movement of troops of the group and so on, therefore, in order to fend off a possible breakthrough of some kind. uh danger with unexpected directions. we absolutely need these russian fair steps . how do you feel about the howl that rises from the south, the west, nato, that's even stoltenberg. president of belarus lukashenko says he should stop involving the republic in the conflict in ukraine country, or rather prostate organization, which occupied rather the entire western measures. that says that we should do

things differently. well, here, after all, the whole point is that these guys have very little knowledge of the contractual basis of our relations with the russian federation, and e. uh, the regional grouping is out of direct communication do not work in public. it is they who are well informed. this is a consequence of the union treaty and our documents in the field of military military-technical cooperation, which were adopted on the basis of the union treaty. and if we look history, then this grouping of teachings has been unfolding since 2009, and every 4 years this grouping is unfolding on our territory, its advancement to our territory is being worked out. combat coordination is being carried out here, mixed crews, belarusian-russian units of the unit there, and in general, everything ends with firing exercises and the return of these units home this time. part i suppose will be for a very long time. it

's in your interest, of course, it's in our interest. after all, the preamble, what it unfolds. in the event of a threat of aggression in in the event of a threat of aggression, that is, if the two presidents decided to deploy this group, it means that they recognize that the threat of aggression exists, that is, a purely defensive option does not depend on the event of zelensky’s proposal to call the belarusian ukrainian border, some international observers. what is this, is this a threat? this is a provocation, this is how it is? well, i think it's an attempt. it means to obscure the situation that is developing on the border, after all. uh, ukraine has concentrated a very solid group of troops there. more 20,000 some 30,000, if you take the territorial troops of the border force, they built a powerful line of fortifications. they blew up the bridges, which they consider the most dangerous, they mined the roads, and in

this situation, when they prepared for war and do a lot of things. well, let's just say reconnaissance of provocative actions against belarus to say that some supposedly peacekeepers are needed and observant. this is a mockery of common sense. there is one more point here, and the obvious strategic goal is yes. uh, sobering hot minds. uh, preventively. so prepare for the unexpected. eh, a possible strike on the territory of belarus, but i think that there are many more such implicit, but very important goals that the russian federation is pursuing first. well , offhand. what are the military analysts talking about, is it the fog of war, that is, uh, actually u understand how many russian troops there are 9.000? nine entered the territory of belarus quite difficult and ukraine will be forced to concentrate part of the reserves, including in chernihiv area, that is, without transferring them now to the most explosive kherson direction, the second is also not entirely, the obvious goal is the combat

coordination of russian and belarusian units. the third is the mastery of those modern weapons that are now at the disposal of the russian federation and belarusian modern weapons include drones, which have been talked about for probably three years now at exhibitions of modern weapons, including in the russian federation. belarus turns out to have, including drums unmanned helicopters western direction. look, the president of poland did not have time for duda to declare that at first he lamented that they did not have their own nuclear weapons, then he said there was a way out. and we will ask the americans to place their arsenal on our territory, and in just a couple of days a newspaper will speak, the commonwealth publishes the results of a sociological survey. the study according to which they claim the majority of poles there 54% support this idea, there 29 1/2 against many abstained. do the poles really want to know this? alexey, you know it all depends on what

questions to ask, if in uh, yes, how to ask, if they asked do you want more and russia launched a nuclear strike, then i think that of course everyone would the answer was no, because the deployment of any nuclear weapon on the territory of poland automatically makes uh, these zones plus uh, headquarters plus large cities targets for u targeting nuclear weapons. naturally, russia, yes. or that, but nuclear weapons, which in the event of further confrontation can be placed on territory of belarus yes, and we have already discussed this more than once that our aircraft are equipped with e, in principle, for modernized to carry nuclear weapons, so now for poland ae, the idea of ​​​​deploying american nuclear weapons. this is such a very good business idea. imagine what huge resources will now be thrown into the infrastructure. yes. uh, some kind of nuclear

weapon. it will be in the mines or it will be mobile, but in any case it requires, uh, huge investments and poland's gdp for the next few, there will be 5-7-10 years just uh, catastrophic plants. they will speak. see what is the word of the polish economic miracle. yes. naturally, why is this being done in order to simultaneously weaken germany on the territory where these nuclear weapons are located, yes, and transfer budgets from uh, slightly recalcitrant germany towards uh. poland yes, therefore, all this is more of a financial economic. and the question is, uh, they are trying to hide it under the guise. russian threats, but in reality, uh, the same polish elites are trying on this to cash in on nuclear, this topic should be promoted now it is necessary to conduct these large-scale exercises of its own. yes, in the north of uh europe, where it’s absolutely right there up to 60. there, the agency against nuclear

weapons does not mean that this is the base of the royal uh, air force klein brogel. yes, in the province of limburg. this is exactly the place where, but the us nuclear warhead is located, this information is officially refuted, but nevertheless, the further. it turns out that it’s not just that they fly there and the words are incompatible with nato’s nuclear deterrence and defense. it's always about the attack. well i must say that in general, the nato doctrine states that in the event of a conflict, it means before the soviet union. now carrier aircraft are with russia. this means that nato countries can be used to strike american nuclear bombs on the territory of the russian federation and its allies, that is, they say in peacetime. so they just train or imitate

or throw blanks, but in the case of e, then the outbreak of a military conflict is legal. they can use these nuclear bombs, which are located in six places in europe to in order to inflict a nuclear strike on the territory, it means russia and belarus well, there are no missiles, there are nuclear bombs. uh, they are simply proposed to be moved from germany, which is rustling, and there it arises, the protest of poland with pleasure, allegedly, allegedly. if he wants to accept them, indeed, the financial costs must be very large, because nuclear weapons must be stored in certain storage arsenals, where the temperature is maintained, humidity and the security option is a colossal investment these facilities should be resistant to damaging factors up to the factors of nuclear explosions in case if someone hits, so of course, uh, if hmm poland will place these weapons. this is

a very serious shift in the entire geostrategic situation in our region. we continue lately. the west has again become more active in the belarusian direction , great efforts are being made to expand the sanctions on belarus, under which russia is the most active lithuania estonia, but all this called for considering belarus as a full-fledged ally of russia in the hostilities in ukraine and the minister of foreign affairs. estonian urnestr, insau said that his country will steadily support democratic efforts belarusian position of civil society and even expressed the last thing about the fact that his country is neighboring in belarus, they say very scary, but apparently the minister does not really understand with whom and what they are adjacent, and with whom we don’t specially for him, we show a map, belarus estonia is not adjacent, relax and, as they say, learn geography irina vasilievna what is happening one jungle everywhere they see the second he

is completely afraid of the neighborhood with belarus, forgetting badly taught at school. what kind of politicians are these, this sixth american fleet is already entering the minsk sea, the minsk sea, and terrible forces with such and you are absolutely right. and they say the same thing, and analysts say so. and moscow analysts. they say that the youth has come. and i even talked to students. i'm telling you, you are advocating that barrel never grow up. didn't grow up. yes yes yes come young people who are not frightened have not yet seen the first war. uh, i was listening to some lady's story yesterday. eh, i was talking about the possibility of making a preventive nuclear strike, a small, small little gift, yes, then they will answer us. well then, we will already enter, that is, some very strange people of history, they don’t know geography, they don’t know political science, they don’t know, and therefore, today,

these western elites are striving for war. this is true. you say it's scary who we're dealing with. what is the level cynicism he emphasizes? well, this one is fine already. come on, the final anti-hero of our time is a barrel, so that without him we would do as quoted. if not, we would have to come up with such a western diplomat, but he 's giving out secrets. it must be urgently changed, because it constantly gives out. that's what they think, here are closed clubs, and he gives it all away. in this case, it is open information. he just voiced it, which means, uh, another 500 million euros will be allocated for the armament of ukraine, uh, i remembered that 500 million the euro was allocated before, but a fundamental point. from where ukrainians from the european peace fund allocate for weapons to the last. this is the whole cynicism aleksey that's what kind of people people or this with whom we are dealing, we have discussed more than once in the framework of this program and on other journalistic platforms that, in principle, then, those who are now in power in the european union

it doesn’t matter if it’s a fucking balti and poland or brussels, and they, basically, all were trained in american schools and in those institutions that finance. that is, either soros, or other funds subordinate to the state department, therefore, in reality, these are hired managers who are fully engaged in washington and london, but they act completely to the detriment of their people, and their european, and countries , and now, within these european countries , a very but internal discontent. we see there is discontent among the population, but there is also discontent among the local national capital, which understands what is going to happen next. ah, the politics of action. here e. hmm such characters. they are will inevitably lead, either to war or to total impoverishment, the impoverishment and bankruptcy

of the bank company. we are already seeing protests as well. we are already watching. that is, of course, while europe has, uh, two approaches, either uh, complete self-destruction, or still, uh, some element of the renaissance, but you need to understand that america and we american political technologists monitor the entire political social very well, and the environment in europe and any encroachments of any, uh, some alternative leaders. they immediately destroy media, destroy, and destroy, uh, physically. yes, if suddenly someone changes the line, so we must admit that the united states and london are now such a new roman empire. e, which is, is not acceptable at all, so that in the e, subordinated to its territories, someone could, e, rebel against the metropolis. here we are talking about the fact that the west obviously and

does not hide is already ready to fight to the last ukrainian. we can in this case, conflicts from the side move to any point. and we will substitute there. why, vassals must die for those who direct them to this battle, and with the slogans that those who go to death welcomes you, they must necessarily express their readiness to protect other people's goals to die. uh, i want to recall a fragment of the interview, which turned out to be very resonant for alexander lukashenko and the american channel nbc. here is one that touches on this topic. let's hear the world is busy now uh, the problems are looking for the answer to the question. listen to who is to blame, then we will figure it out, who is to blame are dying every day people, let's stop the war and agree, and then we will figure out who is right? who is to blame and we started the negotiation process, but it stopped. zelensky was forbidden to negotiate. who can guess from three times he is not

independent, and today it’s right to throw fakes somewhere, it’s wrong to blame each other, the wrong way thousands of people die every day, including civilians who are not visible in anything. it's true, so let's stop this conflict the voice of common sense just yes, yes actually the interview. i think there are many sensible politicians and businessmen who are still left. in the united states in western europe must listen, because this voice is not this is not just the position of belarus. this is the voice of common sense, which is equally comfortable and convenient. if you follow it, it is a problem for any normal sovereign country. i agree that there is practically no sovereign policy left in the world; there is practically no one left that they can afford, either very rich and

huge countries such as the usa, partly russia , china, partly india, brazil, or countries that have e, backbone and core. here belarus such such such such such country still cubes. such a country is venezuela such a country is iran, uh, israel, that is, people who have e, well, you can’t probably say this in court. well, the eggs are just yes, the rod. what about? uh, this conglomerate with irrigation, again i agree, and there was a good idea that for a period of peace and such a calm benevolence of the well-fed, good performers are needed, but as soon as the world starts to move, as soon as borders begin to change, the interests of capital. uh, these good performers just become good gravediggers of the old system, because nothing but blind stupid execution

of orders that he gives them there. uh, washington and either brussels or london, they can't do anything else . and they they are not imprisoned for this, this is scary. well, here is the situation. she is multifaceted. we are often very convenient, of course, to see an exceptional enemy, who is at some distance from you. here we remember, we already touched on the topic there, here is the fifth column. everything, of course, the sixth column. these are people who happen to themselves in the chest and they say there we are for putin we are for lukashenka there , depending on the context, and it seems like they e, they say absolutely the right things, but in fact they do what destroys the state and prevents implementation. there the right idea of ​​developing the economy is mobilizing all the necessary resources of the internal forces for the task. and there is, of course, a direct confrontation - these are the cells that are being unpacked now. the west is what we see in russia now detaining people who are trying, uh, to carry out, uh, terrorist acts. we have colleagues here recently, a

belter radio companies showed materials about how they were once again detained, and very young guys who were almost 500 dollars. they were ready to do everything to start up. yes, that's what we can do here, how to counter this, that, well, the belarusian system gives answers. we are basically good. uh, dealt with this previous uh years. eh yes. now it's just a matter of personal choice , personal decency of these people, but the position of the president. belarus, as i understand it, has always been such that our e, managers, firstly, they must be grounded in belarus . that is, their, uh, money. their home, their children should not be abroad, and secondly, their internal personal ambition in politics in the economy. there in business management should coincide with the general trend of the development of the belarusian state, there should be a

gathering idea, which, of course, is centered by everyone. she worked well in the russian federation, it was different. i do n’t want to criticize our closest adviser now, but it was different and yes, their situation is more complicated, if only because in different periods there were different ideological attitudes, that is, the ideological attitude that we are going back with us, it means that we want to become the sixth economy in the world and have more goals for us. no, we want a european education system and the soviet one was bad. the russian sovereign is even worse, but there were periods. e, in particular. here, uh, the second chechen war, when yes, the internal concentration reached the other pole and they said that everyone who is not with us is against us, another very important short message that sounded, and in astana hmm i i suggest listening to him, and he, in general, to some extent, will gather our conversation, because we somehow made some conclusions, understood? this is why the events that

we are now observing and discussing, please, what we have been talking about for so long over the years has become a reality against all of us is connected with a real hybrid war. and ukraine is just a pretext here, the plans of individual countries for revenge for the lost companies of the last century have been hatched for a long time, starting, as you know, from the first days after the victory in the great patriotic war, and maybe even earlier. today russia and belarus are at the forefront of economic and financial attacks, but i think everyone here understands that the true goals of western strategists are much wider to divide the eurasian space into sectors of influence and use our countries. as raw materials and industrial precursors. you need to be prepared for the most diverse provocations along

the entire perimeter of the cis. recent events in kazakhstan in uzbekistan. convincing and very instructive examples, but this is only the beginning. strength will be tested by everyone irina vasilievna how can we pass this strength test a small step aside. that's when we're talking and you've been talking about this estonian president before. yes, he spoke about civil society there and they hope to blow it up, belarus, first of all from the inside, because they understand that we said that when the poles stand there, they do it like that, while the army has become more active and so on, but they are still trying to steal from the inside. uh, that is, as it were, here we will prepare a civil general , we, and they say, so that we will prepare civil society that flies from within. here i am