eh, about which everyone likes to talk so much, we specially analyzed the legislation, especially on the eve of the referendum, by the way, eh hmm, this rule was already generally applied, and it was the last presidential election of the twentieth year. that is, this is not my personal innovation of some sort. well, at the same time, we received a flurry of criticism. although in some countries we observe that sometimes even places where a person can sit and think about the ballot and put a mark are not equipped with any booths at all. and this does not cause any international experts. eh, so to speak complaints. if it makes sense, in principle, to invite international observers to the new draft of the document. is there such a rule? in what cases do we refuse international observers? there are no such norms, e elections must be free and transparent. but we do not abandon the institution of observers, including international observers. now, if there is no refusal of international

observers in the updated document, then there is a norm for refusing to organize foreign polling stations, firstly, this again, not an innovation of the belarusian legislation. today there are a number of countries, so offhand, i can recall, uh, that do not form polling stations abroad, for example, turkey, uh, armenia, in my opinion, chile , a number of other states, and already at the referendum, you know that we did not form polling stations abroad. first, we do not have all countries abroad. there are our diplomatic processes where these sections could be organized. so, again, we looked at the number of voters who voted for the electoral company, let's say in the presidential elections. e, the twentieth year, and their number was approximately, which means 0.3% of all citizens inscribed on the list, but i do not rule out what can happen with the development of e, information technology, here we are seeing what is happening in the russian

federation here this process, for example, and e-voting the creation of an e- security system is a special platform, and for e-voting it is possible that by bringing together such technologies, you understand, issues will be settled and in the future, perhaps citizens will be able to vote no matter where they are at the time of the elections, these draft documents are final and no longer subject to adjustments, or after public discussions. still, some amendments can be rushed there today, speaking of public discussion. of course, we can talk about the fact that, perhaps, some constructive amendments can be found, and legislative acts can find a place in this bill. they are called upon to ensure that our, uh, active public can express its position. that is, just the same time, the the most indifferent belarusians to show their initiative, probably. thank you very much

please. hopelessness in english the new prime minister of great britain automatically becomes richer than the son who until july of this year held the post of minister of the treasury, after the leader of the house of commons for not mordon, as well as former prime minister boris johnson withdrew their candidacies. sunak remained the only candidate. he was supported by 193 conservative mps. by the way, well, for example, britain is the youngest in recent 200 years old now he is 42 years old. whether reishi will continue drawing the policy of his predecessors to support kiev it is not yet clear, but berlin and brussels have already announced their readiness to prepare a marshall plan for ukraine, the head of the european commission. ursula sanderlen promised kiev over the next year 1.5 billion euros per month of financial assistance the ministry of defense of the netherlands is ready to

provide ukraine with 500 million euros for military equipment. moreover, the tool will come from europe. this peace fund and such a policy causes dissatisfaction among ordinary europeans, especially in a situation of economic catastrophe , it would not be superfluous to remind the head of the european commission that she has no right to manage eu money alone, and germany lives in austerity mode, the government building only warms up to 17 °, and the country's foreign ministry refused hot water, the unstable economic situation in europe - this is a green light for crime in germany, the baltics and the countries of southern europe, a new dangerous type of crime, atm robbery using explosives, usually in bank branches, you can capture small sums and criminals are quickly found, but when an atm is blown up, the extraction is tens of thousands of euros, now gangs in europe

rob ten cash machines per night. and this is minsk, where the court today announced that the sentence to the former press secretary of the a1 company of 4 years for financing extremist activities, nikolai bredelev, was found guilty for providing money for the activities of an extremist group, after the verdict, the arrest on property was canceled. taking into account the presented state accusations evidence by the verdict of the minsk city court, the defendants were sentenced under article 361 with badge two to a sentence of imprisonment for a term of four years by serving a sentence in a correctional colony under general regime conditions, the sentence is now legally valid and has not entered into they will be checked within the prescribed time limits on appeal . bredelev’s court decision was acquitted under the article abuse of official power and

official powers the country’s agricultural enterprises are preparing for winter, special attention is paid to the conditions of keeping cows and safety fodder, the prosecutor's office, carefully controls the process this year more than 5,000 officials were brought to administrative disciplinary and material liability for concealing the loss of livestock, more than 360 criminal cases were initiated, and the course of inspections and rules to which farming is impossible without which nikolay's report from kentin, poor-quality grain processing as a result, the raw materials are spoiled, like the harvest this year, which is only necessary for the preparation of fodder for the economy, arevichi. approached irresponsibly, the raid of the prosecutor's office revealed 60 tons of unsuitable grain damage 1.000 rub. the problems of the enterprise did not end there. during the pre-investigation check , specialists revealed at least 60 tons

of spoiled grain in the amount of more than 120,000 kg of poor-quality feed. the laboratory confirmed that cows should not be given for damage to grain, the management of the farm will have to answer according to the law, according to the preliminary check, the crop was good, however, it could not be technologically processed and the material has now been transferred to the version for giving a criminal law assessment. the end of the heroes a fairy tale and taken under the control of the prosecutor's office of the region observance of technology at all stages of production is a task for farmers. any mistake can lead to sad consequences in the slavgorod region . the reason is the same mismanagement and substitution on earth. it would be worth keeping livestock transported with great danger. for 20 km, 230 heads of bychkov were taken to the farm for the whole daylight hours for tomorrow , they had to sort, outweigh and arrange according to weight standards. well. at night

that day before they had time to do this, at night a tragedy occurred from a crush under a mass of larger ones, and their weight reaches 300-400 kg , six one and a half year old bychkov died, the perpetrators paid the damage, and the prosecutor's office began to check the fact that this case took place in the presence of employees responsible for safety cattle on behalf of the prosecutor's office. currently . an audit is being carried out within the framework of the criminal procedure code. this issue is taken under special control. as practice shows, the causes of loss of livestock in 100% of cases are the same human factor, for each incident the prosecutor's office gives a legal assessment from the executive authorities of the state veterinary service. the prosecutor's office requires , first of all, to ensure the effective fulfillment of their immediate tasks and functions, maintaining the proper level of performance and labor discipline. all

identified violations in the field of animal husbandry are given by prosecutors a fundamental assessment of compliance with sanitary standards, discipline, and also work for the prospect of such an attitude towards this year, the economy adheres to its business for 50 years of october. here, more than 600 tons of corn grain were prepared to feed the cows, the volumes are much higher than last season , the temperature and humidity are normal. now it reaches the desired condition , everything is strictly according to technology. a balanced and varied diet keeps the animals clean, divided by age, and there are necessarily about 7,000 heads on the farm. this is a su-31, the head of the foot. here is a good enough density, and therefore give us the opportunity to have enough dairy garden. company.

about 90% of extra-class milk is among the leaders of dairy production in the region. the rest is top notch . now the farm is preparing all our goals to increase the volume of feed to 40 centners per cow nikolay skein andrey yastrebov alexander murashkin and vasily fataliyev tv news agency. a planned autumn conscription is taking place in belarus, a solemn dispatch of 200 recruits to the army took place in the military commissariat of minsk on the first day. approximately 1,000 people have been sent to call up troops to join the ranks of the forces special operations, the minsk military commandant's office, as well as the 72nd joint training center. today we sent our youth to the special operations forces, the military commandant's office of the city of minsk and the base. khan serves the guys in the central bodies of the ministry of defense of the armed forces. everyone went willingly. i want to say that there are a lot of guys during the draft boards. i wrote to the airport for military

service under the contract and the predicted data that we will have more than 400 contract soldiers for the city will go to re-trained military service on contact according to the ministry of defense, it is planned to send approximately 10,000 people to the reserve in october-november, two hundred fighters, the ceremony of taking the military oath will take place on november 19 in the year of historical memory. we honor the heroes the remains of nineteen soldiers of the russian imperial army were reburied with honors in the postavy region in july 1914, the first world war began, and in the fall of 1915 the front stood on the postavy land, centuries later on the territory of the region trench trenches and fortifications have been preserved. uh, postavshchina there are several burials that are already marked, uh, which are accepted for uh, the burial place of the first world war, uh, which is registered with the state,

but there is still a lot of work to be done to restore all the rest of this to the russian army and in the year of the historical memory correctly remember all wars, not only the great patriotic war, we honor the memory of the fallen soldiers who died here, we drive up with our guys from the historical and cultural complex from the victory soldiers club who also according to the first world events of a century ago , reenactors recreated on the line of fortification by supplying a height near the village of duki . this is a feature film that tells about the fate of cardiologists in the center of the storyline, the socially active position of doctors who develop domestic medicine, the scenario was created with the help of consultations from health workers and commissioned by the ministry of culture. we have received in full funding for this film. hey, we 're really cool. now film crew and

director. i'm afraid it will fit, but we are on schedule and i really hope that in the spring we will see a film that i will be waiting for as moviegoers. so viewers that the film will then travel on tv channels and on platforms, no one chose prototypes. uh, either it's a throne, or something else, or i 'm asking. for example, no one asked me who would be the prototype prototype life dies, please, here is ostrovsky does his choice require or do they require a formal procedure, it seems to him that no life is saved often by everyday people and by people who, probably, in everyday life are the same ordinary people. well, which are marked here. with this opportunity, the international cast is being assisted, colleagues from russia have been invited, but nevertheless, the majority of the work will be done on the creation of the picture, belarusians under the guidance. film director. directed by alexander

efremov, the long-awaited premiere of factor buy, already this friday on belarusian, one 28 october. the belteria team of the radio company launches a telecasting show. in the largest vocal tv show in the country, in one evening we will hear 16 voices of popular songs and sharp comments from the mentor's star four. belarusian is exhausted, we have just begun, you understand and believe that if there are more seasons of the show factor buy, then there will be more best artists, like so, and the factor buy should come out of a variety of factors, you understand, this is both voice and timbre and image the bottom line is that finally we will make the x-factor the way it should have been. yes, because, and the british have always spoiled everything, there really will be a season full of surprises, full of surprises, we will do a real show, everything in this life is possible, and

everything depends primarily only on us, therefore, of course, i am extremely happy that i am here again, we you can’t imagine what a difficult flight it was for me, but as soon as the pavilion turned out to be left. who will be more convincing and get a ticket to the training camp ? the main events of this day. i say goodbye to this, and right now watch an exclusive interview with the philosopher alexander dugin, and the world agenda in relations between belarus and russia and our common future. stay with us. the united states of eurasia the world center of power is changing its residence the west is in the car. it's just that

right now it's trying to hold onto the right to be the only civilization in recent history to have the role of individuals in the role of leaders who are capable of throwing down a fair challenge. suddenly , here it is known in trouble - this is a way out for lukashenka and putin. there's a critical moment revealed the true meaning of the union on two issues is our historical existence of russia and, in this respect, belarus is the one who came to the aid of the brother of the training ground of the mental war and the collapsed blitz, as the west puts pressure on russia through belarus, you turned out to be just avant-gardes in belarus turned out to be russia only in its field that more advanced more adequate form, as well as the identity of the people of centuries of history, a look into the past. there can be no future very much talking about especially identities,

for example, the belarusian people with great respect for the existence of belarusians, composed including the grand duchy of lithuania is an integral part of the history of the belarusian people to keep the country in troubled times, the path to real independence through the storm of great perestroika. russia before the arrival of putin, before the start of his very carefully patriotic reforms, was simply able to be occupied by the west and therefore, while lukashenka is not from belarus, and belarus was a much exclusive interview, the philosopher alexander dugin was pelted by the radio company. watch right now. alexander dugin russian philosopher sociologist political scientist translator in general knows nine languages, including latin, ancient greek hebrew the leader of the international eurasian movement, the american publication

foren policy, included dugin in the top 100 global thinkers of the modern world. included in the list of the most influential intellectuals in russia honorary professor of the eurasian national and tehran university, senior research fellow, fudan university, shanghai hello alexander, thank you very much for taking the time to answer your questions. let me start by talking about your visit. republic of belarus by the president of our country alexander grigoryevich lukashenko when she spoke about the purpose of your visit. he said so in order to see with his own eyes how e lives, belarus, we understand that you have not been on the territory of our country for a very long time. but nonetheless. i will ask you this question. usually when tourists come down and they say that you are pure, of course, deeper, look at all these things and not for the first time in our country. and what have you just seen in

belarus? you know, m-m, i generally admire your country. i admire your people your a-a president. and the most important thing that caught my eye. it's not so much the cleanliness, which, of course, is a very pleasant surprise. how much justice. here in the belarusian society, a sense of justice was preserved, a sense of justice, as ethics, as some, uh, some orientation, which could be seen both among ordinary people and politicians. that is, this sense of justice, a sense of tact of feeling, balance, the absence of bright contrasts between, for example, rich and poor tranquility, which also testifies to balance, because this is already some kind of balance, and this balance of the belarusian society of the belarusian on yes, you

can see what is visible from the first, what is striking is striking. here is the balance. this is a certain absence, but of sharp contrasts and peaceful, and the creative and very open and kind mood of belarusians is called tolerant. now there is a bad word. i don't like to use uh, western words, with very dubious no, please. i'm just saying that i do n't like it at all. these are ambiguous terms. no, belarusians. rather open kind, and rooted in their culture. it's very nice. and a sense of justice. this is a very strong feeling, i think in the belarusian people. and that means that, uh, the contrasts between, for example, the poor and the rich. they smooth out the contrasts between the locals and visitors are also smoothed out. here are some. uh, some unity. what is the

harmony of belarusian life, which is very, very charming? i noticed this even in the first visa, you always visited belarus, but now i also have it again caught my eye. and this is the sense of fairness of balance. well, since you started talking about justice, then. i will ask this question, which i was going to ask a little later when you arrived, and the president stirred up your conversation there. uh, he made us return to our favorite topic in belarus - dialogues and the national idea. here in the twentieth year. i watched an excerpt from one of your interviews and says that, in principle, belarus has no ideology. i even have, uh, quote lukashenka built a sovereign state without ideology, as if with his own on their own, relying on their intuition rather than on any ideas. i literally tested you. uh, meanwhile, you said that she somehow got closer to formulating her national idea of ​​ideology. and what is this step we have taken in these

2 years and what, in your opinion, can be a national idea, belarus is the protection of sovereignty - this is the protection of independence, maybe justice, maybe, uh, social justice, national idea, maybe eurasianism. well, not anti-globalism. well, this one is hardly too hard, i guess for people. you know, it seems to me that at the moment, at the moment, it is national. uh, the idea of ​​belarus is embodied in one person, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko, in your president, who embodies those aspects of the belarusian people of belarusian culture, which, in my opinion, are predominant and justice, of course. plays among them. eh, an important role, but such a final design is the ideology of the ideology of the eastern slavs, the ideology of peace, the ideology of balance, ideology, uh, harmony, ideology.

openness and friendliness are a little peasant , just as the slavs in their history were predominantly peasants, or there is nothing wrong with that, on the contrary, our 99% until the beginning of the 20th century in our population of the entire russian empire were peasants and belarusians and great russians and little russians. we are a peasant people. and what is wrong with this and the fact that, uh, belarus, despite its achievements in industry and engineering in other areas. all the same , this one retains this balanced psychology, and the east slavic peasants. this is surprising, because this is actually the key to both us giants and the key to little russians, only real authentic ones, and in this respect. eh, belarus has retained the key to the national identity of our common east slavic national identity, which includes belarusians or korrus and little russians, and a in this respect is white.

the russian society managed to keep the president as well, especially thanks to the very delicate attitude towards the identity of the president's own society, they managed to defend this. at what pressures from all parties to keep it as well today as just in my opinion. we stand. uh, here, belarus is standing. i already say we because we are so close that it is difficult for us. to distinguish between each other even or but to separate today we are on the verge of betraying this complex of intuitive values ​​of intuitive orientations, which are brightly reflected in alexander grigoryevich lukashenko and supported by the majority of belarusian society, to betray this character some more formalized not that to the ideology of netu e or the national idea of ​​belarus no, she just not complete. not not not completely, not in the most

distinct and distinct way, we formulate it, and it is very difficult, because when we try to reflect, these are the deep foundations of the people's being. we often resort to formal terms and immediately get past, because we take western concepts, which to our society in east slavic consumerism are any different, even any concept of a nation. this is the western concept of the concept of an individual person, the western concept of the concept of political power, even the very definition political is also western in many respects, because the west interprets politics in its own way, interprets a person in its own way, interprets the people. society is all part of western concepts to the windows, er, in the eastern slavs and belarusians and russians and, to a large extent, little russians. in general, these norms are very, very relative to the peoples of eurasia. here is the

thinnest one. it is very difficult to blunt this our national idea, our national ideology , because new terms are needed and it is very difficult to describe it. new approaches are needed new ideas are needed, and in order to break through to them, it is necessary to free ourselves from the pressure of the west, because the west has also changed through the 20th century and is changing now and every time at any of its levels of development. he dictates his values ​​to everyone else. go today, this is liberalism, individualism, which has become dolma. and this liberalism and individualism generally denies the ethics of the peoples of the collective history of the values ​​of the traditional tradition. all this does not exist at all, only individuals and, in fact, already post- human species exist. this is where it leads. west this is completely unacceptable to us. if we will, uh, operate with such terms. we will not formulate any of our national ideas. we will not be able to get any idea about our society, so there are such problems with the wording. here this national idea and in

and and in belarus well to formulate it is necessary to realize at first. and this is not so simple, but in order to realize it is necessary to get rid of this dominant influence of the west, because the west , on the basis of its own historical path of its historical experience formulated a number of values ​​that also change based on their changes. and then he broadcasts these values ​​to everyone else and imposes on them the one who does not fit. under them , he rewards and demonizes with the latest labels and excludes us belarusians and russian great russians in this situation. and by the way, little russians and ukrainians need to find, uh, develop their own language, even in politics , in order to formulate an idea, we need a language, and this language, to a large extent, which is broadcast to us from the west, it does not suit us, because there simply are no such terms. there is no term people. there simply is a society , there is an individual, there is a society, and there is such a people, in our russian slavic sense there is no concept. and for us, this is the main thing, because we do not see any. humanity between

the direct direct connection between humanity and the individual for the west, humanity - is a collection of individuals. but for us, not at all. for us to be it passes among the people, and the people for us. the most important thing from here, there is populism and belarusian and russian and ukrainian people. for us, this is a certain being, and of which we are a part, and its fate of the people is the dialogue of the people of one people with another, close or distant. this is what world history is made up of for us. so some german romantics thought, some european romantics, but this did not become the main line of development of social thought. everything has come to individualism to liberalism. we are just closer to this, to the romantic idea that the people, as the herders said, by the way, this is the thought of god, and that's when the thought of god is infinite, it is multidimensional. we cannot decipher only in rational pragmatic terms.

god has a thought about the belarusian people, and just as the thought of god is incomprehensible, so the belarusian people are incomprehensible. this, in my opinion, is the most difficult and the most difficult thing to understand is to decipher, to give it the correct form. the correct proportions are usually very difficult. why did we talk with alexandra grigorievich that they bring him a national idea almost every day? side or there in the basket? why because we didn't talk in such detail? why condemned, but i think i want to state my hypothesis, because we are projecting western criteria onto the belarusian people. eh, the individual's individual well-being comfort uh, social progress, and here it is necessary to take a different approach . i was just saying that the peoples of god's thought must be recognized. here, but hmm that thought of god a in beads and about russians about us great russians

about our people about our culture that we we carry to ourselves, which is revealed through us. and this is not easy, and in this regard, the national idea or the formulation of the national ideology is an absolutely subtle and subtle process and project some general and generally accepted ideas on us, which we most often take from the western political school. this is incorrect. that's why a and all these attempts end in failure. we are almost the same . here are all the attempts. here we outlined the russian national idea, people come and us, uh, bravo reports that she consists of getting out of a causal relationship, but uh, people first come up with an ideology and then plan to introduce it to the masses. and it should be the other way around. first, an ideology must, uh, be born and grow within. and it needs to be described and formulated that alexander grigoryevich lukashenko sees it this way and does not want to implement it. violence should be ordered

, and it should not be a scheme. it should not be some kind of artificial construction. it just seems to me that lukashenka is like a very deeply popular person, and the people's leader he waits and watches. how it grows this is a national idea, how it matures, how it takes on various forms. he is very sensitive to the life of his people. this is an amazing leader , an amazing leader, uh, who carefully listens to the secret to the secret life invisible on the surface, not coming out the secret life of his people, so i think he is popular and loved in belarus, he is attributed to the western paradigm, because the actions are completely different criteria. there, who are more successful, who are more dexterous people there spit on historical unity spit on culture. today, in general, it is practically eliminated. and m. poroshenko as

a people's leader, he is very careful about the values ​​of his people and his history, he listens to their secret passage secret secret motives. these are stories and often in our language in such a modern in the general western political language. they simply do not find the corresponding correct words and terms, therefore, it seems to me, lukashenka rejects the wrong ones, and the correct one has not yet matured. they are ripen. this is the belarusian idea, the russian idea, our common eurasian idea. it is maturing now, we have only now truly decided to free ourselves from those, hmm , artificial concepts that have been introduced by the individualistic liberals of our society for decades. today we are freeing ourselves from them and trying to find our belarusian and russian meanings in a very interesting way. uh, because when the belarusian nationalists, in particular, i don’t know if they are aware of this or not, they describe. uh, alexander dugina they

say that this give-ka, except russian the world is not interested in anything, meanwhile, you talk a lot about szabo identity, for example, the belarusian people with great respect, as far as i saw, they spoke about the history associated with the grand duchy of liszt. well, imagining how one of the cradles of belarus in general, but it seems to me that here in russia is the russian part of the russian elite, well, somehow with some kind of paste for this part of our history. uh, they relate. i have a question why. because there belarusian nationalists, including this story and others like it, raised it to the shield of anti-russia. or because after all, part of russia is afraid to see, just independent. here, as you know the reason, but firstly, i think that those people who represent me as narrow nationalists are absolutely wrong in general. they do not understand and do not know my work at all. i have here 23 volumes 24 volumes on amahi. there is such a big huge work. i gave it to alexander grigorievich and lukashenka. during

his visit on all the volumes where i describe, a variety of civilizations from the most important principles is not to impose any criteria. in general, not to say that i am a better civilization is lagging behind. this is bad this is good. uh, the russian world is only a part of this , uh, mosaic of peoples and cultures, and i'm interested in all of them and the russian world and the european iranian sibit african. uh, indie hindu chinese is all absolutely incredible incredible life worlds. and humanity is made up of humanity. that is, from humanity. these are some of these are all together a collection of different worlds. this is not one world, but many worlds, and in this respect, never for me. e, i i categorically reject all forms of nationalism and racism, that is, the setting of one culture over another, be it western eastern islamic christian great russian belarusian all cultures are not

measurable, we cannot measure them, just as it is impossible to measure the level of perfection of the present. here are living organisms, each of them is necessary, so i want to say that hmm, the search for a national idea or the search for the identity of one people. should never be directed against, but against the other, as regards, and on us in fact. i am i think that the belarusian nationalists and sometimes. we are russians. we misinterpret this part of our common east slavic history, firstly, but hmm we are great russians used to. uh, because we have a moscow-centric view. we are accustomed to consider this as different, as poland was more to you then, after the silt of unification and still a great prince.

lithuanian retained its independence. that is, we usually hmm got the impression that this is the west, that this is the west, and our brothers belarusians were under the rule of the alien and polish catholic strength is like that. well, in general, the great russian attitude towards this belarusian is stable, the nationalists, on the contrary , they want to oppose this, and hmm identity, incl. oppose the muscovite kingdom and represent our association. the subsequent one, such as violence against the belarusian identity, and you know, in my opinion, any extreme is in question, it is wrong. we must pay great attention to the peculiarities of the belarusian identity and the history of the grand duchy of lithuania and the place there. belarusians, who played a crucial role in this in this state. this is a very complex world. there were different eras, there were different periods, when there was a union, when there was a belarusian.

predatory was called independently when it came under the influence of poland, and nevertheless, the belarusian people retained a predominantly orthodox identity, the ancient russian one, this our common slavic one, and carried it through all the centuries, just as we carried our great russian identity through e, the mongol-tatar epochs , and the belarusians they also carried our the ancient deep east slavic identity through the lithuanian and then the polish catholic era, and everything influenced us, and we took some values, of course. it's the most important. we remained in the great russians. you remained in belarusians, little russians, remained little. and this is our core and we must treat this, our history, this organism with a huge degree of care, very, very careful, not trying to say we are part of poland there or we are part of the tatar world were the influence of different western and eastern both on you and on us. in persons

many different influences and in different historical periods we perceived them differently, treated them differently, partially absorbed, partially discarded , partially transformed. this is a very non-linear thing the life of the people. and so, in my opinion. there is a significant mistake of the great russians. that is, us, when we do not want to pay sufficient due attention to the identity of the belarusian people, the identity of the ukrainian people, when we try to say, well, these are the same russians. well, in part. yes , but partly no. and this is the need taking into account the identity of the belarusian ethnos of belarusian history, where the existence in the grand duchy of lithuania was influenced to a large extent not only in a bad way, and in allah and in a good way. it is impossible to separate. this is simply part of the historical existence of historical identity is impossible. it is identified with us big -haired from moscow well, you can’t go, you just need to accept. it is necessary to accept and if we do not

show enough, we are russians, you have enough attention and delicacy to the identity of belarusians. never ours the unification will not truly be complete. we must be careful with attention to the nuances of all the features of the belarusian people of the belarusian psychology of the belarusian history and the existence of belarusians, including the grand duchy of lithuania, this is an integral part of the history of the belarusian people, which, of course, influenced the identity, which laid down certain and certain features that we must respect to be considered as well as our existence in the horde e empire in the golden horde is also on us influenced. and that's not bad. and not good. it 's just that we are big russians such belarusians such small russians are the third and in order for us to really find that base of those boards. the form

that unites us all three east slavic peoples is something unified, plus , uh, rusyns, for example, another small group within this eastern slavdom. yes , we have one source - these are the east slavic tribes, but historically we moved away, converged, converged, that is, the eurasian superpower is not a single border of the administrative one capital. this is the only philosophy, view of life in this way eurasists. initially, this just differed from nationalism to eurasianism in that the unified system is not imposed on anyone. our eurasians trubetskoy savitsky by the way, they also came from western russia, soviet and, in particular, many others. and a. they were just talking about the fact that eurasianism is a flourishing complexity, as konstantin leontiev said. it is a completely independent mosaic of cultures. this is not just russification. not just uh, affirmation of all uh. not all differences within a single

great russian culture is nothing like this is the acceptance of all in a single inflorescence. that's what eurasianism is, we accept belarusians. not just as citizens of such neutral, but as a people with its own characteristics, we accept the eurasianism of the little russians, also with their own characteristics, their specific cultural linguistic historical differences, we accept not only the great russians, of course, but, there are also non-slavic people. and they also form part of this eurasian power. we must not russify them, we must not russify them, but deprive them of their own identity. on the contrary, we must include them in this inflorescence of culture. that's what eurasia is - blooming complexity. it can be said that the flourishing complexity of cultures, in the words of konstantin leontiev, and in this sense, eurasianism, on the contrary, is, if you like, anti- nationalism, nationalism suggest a narrow one, some kind of alignment is taken. and under it all

the rest line up. and the eurasianists. he says, yes, we do not need such unification. let's let a thousand flowers bloom. let thousands of ethnic groups and thousands of cultures be in as part of a single fraternal fraternal bloc civilizational field, and we can give different peoples different degrees, if you like, of autonomy, that is, they want more autonomy. more we will be strategically united, but each of us, each of the components of this eurasian flourishing complexity, will retain its originality, as soon as i can state that our opponents are accurate to the turn. it interprets everything and simply turns the meaning of it all upside down; i use what is natural, the layman does not have opportunity to delve deeper into these issues. plus, of course i think that the nationalists, by the way, are both russian and belarusian. well, we already see the ukrainian ones, this is in fact the very thing, but a wretched and primitive form of distortion of our identity, when we are dealing with nationalism

, this is a european western concept that was simply introduced to us and in order to destroy our traditional society, the russians, to push, to push our east slavic peoples. russian belarusians, ukrainians, other peoples, turkic peoples siberian peoples. we have never lived in nation-states. the nation-state was invented by the western europeans. we had an open open interaction, a dialogue of cultures. we never by color. well, we all have approximately the same skin color, but we have never set barriers on an ethnic basis. we lived where we wanted in the west of our powers. in the east on our power. we kept our ethnic customs. we supported them, we didn’t eradicate them, we didn’t eradicate them, and these concepts of nationalism come to us. just don't fit not great russian, not belarusian, but ukrainian, this is a form that distorts the existence of our peoples. this does not mean that we all have to.

by the way, the same this means that we must preserve and cultivate our differences, but only in dialogue in a symphony of mutual exchange. this applies to everyone, and here, for example, to an extreme or an ecstasy about russification, when everyone will only be a great russian, and everyone else they say. secondary, of course, other peoples can meet the excesses of nationalism. the same belarusian or maybe ukrainian or there, well, tatar, but if we ourselves are great russians, that is, we understand russian, and the mission that history has given us is to unite people around us, to unite cultures, not to impose our identity in any case to treat others with respect . here, then, in my opinion. a completely different one will emerge. the level of dialogue from others. i mean, not only belarusians, when i say not to impose, i speak western civilization, and recently from the mouth. uh, european elites, they just sound shameful. i have some statements

quote. there is such a minister of foreign affairs. e european union the barrel that you remember, probably, these statements that europe and the usa are flowers. europe is a blooming garden, and around this blooming garden the jungle, the jungle, sometimes steps on the garden. so you need to cut down the jungle. then he said that we are peoples from the west, the eu and the usa, we were the masters of the world blinky recently declared that we are the masters of the world, we lead it and we must keep these furrows of government. e in your hands. what's going on with the west and what are the the reasons for all this is the west against the east or it is the globalists against the anti-globalists, and that there is some kind of philosophical worldview behind it or behind it. uh, the banal desire to get to uh, the resource to the minerals of the east, you know, it's very deep. uh, a deep phenomenon called ethnocentrism. you are also a very interesting phenomenon. i wrote a big book. oh, mm ethnosociology

textbook and a lot of courses on this basis at moscow state university are still being read there, which i created , uh, related to ethnosociology. and so ethnocentrism is a concept inherent in any society. here, oddly enough, a small society is even a primitive indian tribe of perron in latin america, south america, which in general they don’t even have an account, that is, they don’t know how to count. and yet they believe that they are the center of the world. that is, this centrism is characteristic not only of large large and developed civilizations. well, it is characteristic of small tribes, but they not only think, they act, you know, yes, this ethnocentrism is generally a property human society. like this? well, good or bad. we put ourselves in the center , we believe that everything that is outside is worse than we are on the periphery, but in some cases this is the nature of such pride. civilizational and for the west it was typical. the west considered itself only a civilization of all the rest, idiots of all

tikars. even zoned the world for civilization barbarism and savagery in the 19th century in morgan's russian theory that the western world is a civilization around it of barbarism. this is where we get the zone, there are russian muslims chinese. this is a zone of barbarism. and there is more savagery. these are very undeveloped peoples, and they still see the world that way. this is when ethnocentrism is common to everyone, even here, as we said, the perahan tribe acquire such gigantic proportions. and when this nacentrism goes beyond it, it becomes completely unbearable absolute and imposes itself into an emotional one, turns into russian, that is, western for the west. and this is such russian ethnocentrism was characteristic. they are even greeks still ours, before senka they believed that those who do not speak barbarians in greek, that is, they do not speak, they have no language, there is some kind of mumbling. that

is, what he says, they were not understood, they did not recognize for others the right to be different, to be a language, and not simply believed that these were not greeks. and this is racism. eh, deeply rooted in western european culture. it is not peculiar to us, it is not peculiar at all. e in such hypertrophied, at least in the form of other people. and for the west, it is characteristic and today, when the west is faced with the rise of non-western already civilizations of the eastern uh in the eurasian our common chinese civilization of the islamic civilization of the indian civilization. the west is in agony. it's just that now he is trying to keep the right to be the only civilization and hand out labels. who is civilized, and who is not realized before the attack of new civilizations of new centers, that is, this is the gradation of russian civilization , barbarism and savagery. this is about different

civilizations. just different and our famous philosopher and historian danilevsky. uh, he's russian said that there is not only one civilization, but there are many of them and in this respect. the west refuses to recognize that there is specialization because of its limit. he calls us all savagery , barbarism, what is not like him, so they are trying to establish themselves as the only criterion of civilization. and we have our own east slavic civilization , there is islamic, there is indian chinese, and now we are talking about giving battle to this unipolar russian civilization in order to establish diversity and multipolar peace. this is the most important thing, this is now a field of struggle, with which it is struggling in life and blinkin , in fact, the modern west has become russian. he said for a long time that we are not racists. elegance we are for democracy for freedom, but in fact, this is a russian ethnocentric essence. the west

has now opened up like never before and is going against it, and our struggle is being waged for a multipolar world. we are not against western civilization, we are against the fact that western civilization has the only criterion and ability to judge. who is civilized, but that day, and you said it was always like that. that is, you think that this is another round of spirals and there will be more such rounds or this is the final battle not for life to death between these two e, poles. now there are not even two poles, but they are fighting, it was earlier that two bipolar ones were more difficult. yes, today there is one pole claiming all this globally. yes? this west is actually a new form of racism, western- centric racism. by the way, i conferred with glinkin from brzezinski. i imagine these are people. this is a new edition liberal democratic racists. it is they who believe that the sleeping democratic ideas of the modern west are universal and all of humanity must accept them, and those

who do not accept them have no right to exist. this is pure such nazism, liberal nazism and bzhizinsky thought so, that is, for them they say modern developed people are like us. and if they are somehow different, then they are just barbarians. and then everything is dynamic. they must be destroyed now, uh, but they are not only confronted today by any one civilization, not the second pole, as it was, for example, in soviet times today. eh, the west against all , he wants to impose on all civilizations and ours and chinese and hindu and islamic only their principles and rules, i refuse, not recognizing others. uh, civilizations refused to consider them civilizations at all. they speak of civilization not in the singular. and then exercising with yourself. we are fighting and defending diversity and our difference from them and the opportunity for the chinese to have their own criteria for civilization by the hindu muslim african

latin americans to americans, therefore, the struggle is now going on not between neither in a bipolar world, as it was in the 20th century, but between a unipolar world, which clings to all places and many polar ones, namely, a lot of polar measure. this is multipolarity. this is what distinguishes our era from the previous one, and now it’s just the highest stakes that are not just about nation states, the nation state is an invention of the modern west. they unified peoples and cultures through nation states in order to sooner or later come to e to modern globalism, that is, nationalism. this is just a stage of western nationalism beyond the stage of globalization. therefore, nationalism should be alien to us; it is the opposite of our historical tradition. we should not be nationalists in any sense, not belarusian, not russian or ukrainian. absolutely western chimera, we must build our civilization open on the basis of our values, observing. uh,

diversity, but different ethnic groups culture of ethnic groups. we must be open. we need to be truly inclusive imposing on anyone as nationalism its strict direct. uh, such a primitive value system, nationalism is our enemy. i want to say that we should give us how to solve this problem, as in your opinion, this forecast from you will conditionally say that peace on the entire planet will be achieved through peace or through war, which we very much decided. well, you know there is a similar saying. if you want peace, everything is ready for war, if we are not ready to protect our civilization of our value in any way, then they will simply be taken away from us. that is no one will give us. but, if we are truly strong and resolute, then i hope it will not come to a direct war. after all, what is happening, for example, in ukraine today, this is the result of a significant degree, and our underestimation of ours, and the strategies of the west and this, of

course, is the criminal practically nazi regime of kiev, but there is, uh, in the fact that it has gained a foothold in ukraine if we are our fault did not underestimate the threat. we did not do everything that we could do in those eras when we had relations with the same ukraine even more or less. eh, more or less decent. we did not protect those who thought otherwise than these kiev ultra-nationalists and westerners. and at the time when we had these opportunities. today we are not in the best position, that is, here we are talking about the fact that a war is the a worst solution to the situation, and it indicates that someone made a lot of mistakes. because if we didn't do everything to avoid straight. military clash, so we are also to blame, even if we are victims, we are still to blame for the fact that the war started i guess

that the stronger the more conscious, the deeper, the more powerful will be e, the representatives of this multipolar reality are thinner, building a system of alliances, alliances of mutual understanding among themselves. the kinder we will be to ourselves and to our brothers. how carefully. let's treat the differences that separate us, but do not oppose, the more chances we have to avoid a full real world war, because, of course, it acts as an aggressor. uh, first of all, the globalist west, but we must ask ourselves and us and the chinese and hindus. here are the supporters of the multipolar world and russians and belarusians. and we did everything, to avoid this, and we built a harmonious state, what is not. well, you see, here is the war, it really is, although of course, in this case, the west is the initiator of the war and the clash, but you

say that the west is the aggressor in this situation, and the ukrainian elite, in your opinion, are they traitors or they victims, of course, they are primarily traitors, but at the same time they are victims, because they are also victims of their own delusions. so they're reworking us. we great russians, you belarusians, and we must think and are responsible for ours. uh, we are carrying east slavic brothers, ukrainians, we cannot say, you are all nazis, you are all fascists, we will fight with you. it's it 's happening now, but it's not the best turn. we're responsible for it. and of course, uh, you really have to ask yourself if we did everything ourselves, to avoid this uh conflict, so i think that hmm in a little russian identity, it should be. wall belarusian identity, it must be taken into account for this ukrainian cruel question-western absolutely inhuman

nationalism. we had to oppose not our own and must and in the future should oppose not our own nationalism, but unity. with respect and taking into account their identity, we must also include them, not exclude them. i believe that nationalism in general is a very, uh, dangerous western delusion. we must affirm our identity as great russian belarusian and small-born and recognize this difference and only in such harmony in such fraternal unity. with respect for each other's differences. we we can truly build a harmonious state. but what is happening in ukraine , uh, this uh, real nazism, which the ukrainian elites have adopted, is a complete transition to the side of the globalist west, and everything. uh, any alternative to the instant ilona mask is worth it, only there was something critical to let go of a remark, he ended up on the site in for

destruction. it’s just that, of course, these are already extreme forms, and the responsibility of the ukrainian elites of ukrainian idiologists for all this is for the fact that they have turned ukraine of course, complete, but, but, in my opinion, even when we are now in war, we still need to understand our own mistakes and our own responsibility for what happened, we should have prevented this. if we allowed this, then we are to blame. in a sense, we ourselves, because it is still a murderous brother, and the war that is going on now in ukraine, we are destroying our own people. we are forced to do this. and although, of course, the fault lies mainly with the west and with these ultra-nationalist, essence of the matter about western ma. the exact elites who seized power in our native country in our own. probably our country. um, ukraine still

can't be held responsible, i like it, i'd like to see what you say, have we done everything, because, well, we still call you big brothers. still, russia is a huge country, we always look at him. e on you. here. you might like to dump on belarus for the last 30 years. here uh, almost, the trouble did not happen. uh, here it sometimes seems to me that in russia it’s a little frivolous treated the processes that took place in belarus, i can tell you. uh, what worked these decades. here i was the deputy for the year 2014-15. now i head a large holding. this is a very large company with more than a dozen regional channels with a large number of radio stations, the largest in the country, and i have received in all these years after the fourteenth year of the twentieth, but i do not know how many. well, maybe half a dozen. ah, delegations. well, she wound them up so weird. from the west from the british lords to the state department to the senate american is an international

organization. it was like a procession. i would compare it to the locust. it was a huge pressure. that's what i encountered, and they all spoke harder alone. they demanded, asked, persuaded, bribed and asked for only one thing. let's cancel everything russian they said in your holding. come on, you will no longer broadcast in russian. let's get you out of, uh, all fiction films are documentaries. uh, you have russian and soviet in your holding. there is a federal channel platform. give up on her. we promise you. eh, whatever you want. eh, you will have any content, just make such a decision, and i am sure that our state faced this at all levels, it was the refusal to do this that turned us into a dictatorial state, over which, well, it’s a sin to hide, including the russian elites, smile somewhere. why was the president's words not taken so seriously when he said that we are not only defending belarus . we are at the forefront of russia's defense

if now you are aware of this in russia. you know, but there are some differences here between, for example, the position of the patriotic eurasian and the positions of the russian elites that developed in the nineties, and, in general, to a large extent, preserved under putin. i think that we became a victim of a real occupation, that is, russia before the arrival of putin, before the start of his very careful patriotic reforms, she was simply in a state of occupation by the west and therefore there is no alkashenka, and belarus is not, and belarus was belarusian, and in the yeltsin era in the nineties we simply became under the floor, as it were, they bowed before the west, and belarus stood and was a reproach for our elites and hope for all these attacks for the patriots. yes, of course, that’s all, unfortunately, it didn’t end when we passed our pas. president, it seems to me, it began to come to an end literally just now only now, and our president really realized

what steadfastness of courage and just wisdom is, and the belarusian leader, who understood the situation in which his country finds our country in much . better. after all, this was presented as a desire to hold on to power, but still much deeper and you know the russian patriots at some point in the nineties and even after the two thousandth , they often looked at lukashenka as their leader, as their mmm. she is like us. e its beacon e, identity protection protection of traditional values ​​protection of social justice, not trusting our cosmopolitan pro westerners or there, but, hmm, the situation is changing now, in my opinion, it has especially changed, of course, after the start of special military operations. well. after uh in the twentieth year of events in belarus, it has also changed quite a lot. uh,

changed, she first of all. i think, in principle, our president, that is, here, and vladimir vladimirovich, despite the pressure of lobbying, has some not particularly patriotic elites in his environment. he is clearly aware of the importance of lukashenka's belarus for us as the most fraternal, the closest, the most courageous one. uh, well, perhaps the most important country for russia , and since the twentieth year of belarus for russia, minsk for moscow has only been growing, a after starting yours. i still think, well, it just turned out that everything about what we were talking about for several decades turned out to be true, of course. that's why i say that, hmm, we didn't see, we didn't notice about our elite, such reserve people came to you from the outside and they are here at nine. for 7 years, the sixth column is a wonderful term, which, probably, brought it into use. and i led, uh, the sixth column. and and this is the sixth

column - this is the fifth column, those who oppose the russian state, and the sixth columns, which have the same views as the fifths, but are so formal. she supports very dangerously. this is the most, because it is the enemy within. and this is the sixth column and is responsible for the constant a-a criticism of lukashenka and belarus since the nineties and even during the putin period. thank god now its positions have weakened significantly, although they have not disappeared. but it turned out that lukashenka's position is the position of a person more likely to be for but our eurasian civilization is more responsible than many political figures in the entourage of our president. i think this is alexander nikolayevich lukashenko today. for vladimir vladimirovich putin, this is the main friend and support in this cree. that is, the situation and while it is exposed who is a friend. and who is the enemy, the representative of the west, chubais fled

the country shamefully, leaving behind billions of thefts, and lukashenka, whom the russian elite, of course, frankly, treated badly, turned out to be the most faithful and close friend in this critical practical situation. where is russia suddenly found out in trouble - this is lukashenka and about putin and i think that now a lot has changed in the relationship between moscow and minsk and we don’t even realize it yet. as far as because our truly cosmopolitan pro-western elites tried to present, and the unwillingness, for example, to carry out liberal reforms in minsk, as some, uh, dictatorial inclinations and the belarusian leader, and this was a concern for the people, because our oligarchs just led many to that deplorable state in which many branches of our industry and our science are located. give away the forms all reforms are right for western partners, sometimes our oligarchs or

even some responsible responsible political figures believe that belarus is the one who did not follow the path of total privatization of everything and plunder of peoples. all the same, they are, as if it were a minus in fact, although it was a lifesaver, because the president did not want one fine moment in quotation marks, as today we turned off the switches. we would be left with absolutely nothing. perhaps you were just the avant-garde and belarus turned out to be russia only in its field, or something, in a more advanced, more adequate form, and therefore now closeness and not just even an alliance, but kinship is such a spiritual political historical kinship. uh, great russians russians and belarusians. now this is the axis that is the axis of victory. this is not just one of the components of the strategic confrontation with the west, it is actually the axis of the future. and in general, i think that now, if we truly realized the scale and significance of alexander e, grigoryevich lukashenko, we would

in a different way, they simply looked at many things, because he is not only the belarusian leader, our common leader is, of course, we are the president of our paths, but the alliance, putin and lukashenko this is something more than the alliance of huge russia and powerful and relatively small belarus does not exist in historical unions hmm and so submission does not happen to the authority of lukashenka the great leader and belarus, which today finds itself in a very difficult situation, because this is pressure from the west on the very position of independence and sovereignty, which lukashenka simply strengthened at the cost of any efforts, but this will be further aggravated by an alliance with us, because lukashenka and although of course, belarus did not enter into a direct conflict, but the position is understandable, and the ukrainian nazis simply believe. uh, belarus enemies,

at least, and we, on the contrary, are aware of all russians, we create fraternal, love for uh and support, and belarus in this respect is determined by position, uh, clearly defined . i think that the role of belarus today for russia is huge, therefore it is not it’s just that some part is an independent whole and we understand it all, and we are with the deepest gratitude and incredible respect and love. she relate hmm to lukashenka and e. i think that there is a lot ahead of our e our states, we are standing now bobak. and aleksandrovich lukashenko repeatedly warned putin to putin that someday it would turn out that the moment had come. and it turns out, how many friends there were when we traded gas and oil, how many friends there were in russia, and now there is

nobody, and now here's your back. e hmm k back with the heroic wise deep seasoned belarusian people. we russians are now defending our right to historical existence. and i think that this moment is true and significant, and the leaders of belarus, the wisdom of his policy, courage, when he resisted not only the west and all the pressure, but we also had to here. here now yes and here it was necessary. e, and accordingly, i think that e belarus is the vanguard of all of us eastern slavs. now we must be united more than ever. uh, with this the only thing we have to do with great respect, especially we russians, because we are larger and therefore often pay enough attention to me for those who are in scale, as it were, in numbers. for example , or in a territory smaller than we are, this is an erroneous thing, this must be abandoned. this must be chewed up about yourself. this is an equal

partnership, a partnership of a large number of quantitative great russian people and a relatively small number of belarusian people - this is a partnership of equals, and this is friendship of equals, this and the common historical fate are completely equal, and it is very important for us to find these proportions proportions. i even think that belarusians are more ready for them. eh, than what we are and here and there it is necessary to show certain historical wisdom to understand that if a brother by m-m by stretches out his hand to you. it's not junior anymore, brother. it's just a brother, that's what the word junior senior should do. uh, and the emphasis on the word is essential, brother. the brother is not small, not less than the youngest, namely the brother extends his hand to you, a dear person in a critical situation. where are you? actually , you are in a very serious test, because russia is going through a very difficult, perhaps, the most uh, the most critical

moment in our history after the great patriotic war on two issues, our historical existence of russia and uh, belarus in this respect is hmm well, just those who came to the aid of a brother in a critical situation, i don’t remember evil, a what has happened between our countries over the past 30 years has been different and here is the one who is wiser than someone and the eldest, therefore in a sense, here is the eldest, but is in belarus so in this form your assessments of what happened in our twentieth century year and evaluation of the actions of the president, when tough enough, sometimes outrageous, as with a machine gun, they have changed. you somehow overshadowed, rethought since then, or you, then you already saw everything for you, then everything was clear. you know, e. many of us experienced a reassessment, but for me not, because from the very beginning i believed, respected and loved alexander

grigoryevich lukashenko, i knew that it was clear that this state was an attempt at a coup d'état of an institution. i understood how it works. uh, this is the western fifth column. i understand that belarusian nationalism is not nationalism, what is it an artificial form of globalists for the destruction of belarus, i understood perfectly well that this is extremism working for money for poland to the west, and that alexander grigoryevich lukashenko is a real patriot, a real fighter for his people. i realized that this is not nationalism against an internationalist. and this is the real belarusian people who fight with their enemies with their enemies, who managed to seduce the youth and managed to deceive certain segments of the creative class. e artists managed to instill in them completely false goals and false values. and of course for me, but what i am crossed in is personal heroism, lukashenka, who with his son went out to meet the buz and, uh, the crowd pumped up by

western intelligence agencies, pine and steam, which could at any moment end the life of your leader, that is, his courage and his steadfastness him, a self- righteousness. this is already a true hero. it’s just that nothing has changed for me and that’s how i always imagined the video and e, but i was filled with the deepest feeling of respect for him. ah hmm just a great man and a small one of the belarusian people, the great leader is, and so wonderful and, of course, in order to keep it all. we must be very careful to treat this amazing person. many people say how much power it has, we need changes, but to see what is happening next to these changes in power, the prosperous country of ukraine has every chance of becoming a wonderful, oasis, the president

said, put our country in peace. i'll leave for the authorities, but break them and that's it. that's it he's holding he's holding for belarus, while the ukrainians went differently , their scenario is bloody hell, the beautiful ukrainian steppes have turned into some absolutely monstrous massacre, where everything is destroyed, where we are forced to destroy. uh, ukrainian industry, ukrainians, are forced to destroy or are not forced, but simply destroy their own citizens or our citizens. we are, in fact, historically one and this is, uh hmm, a bloody mess instead of prosperity. this is the result of western strategies. lukashenka realized that she shouldn’t give in to this, what to listen to? them it is impossible that it is necessary to move, but is. i follow my historical destiny and he won. look at the calm, strong, reliable

belarus and what is going on hmm on its borders , and i think that this is the merit of alexander grigoryevich lukashenko as a true leader of his people in the end. uh, victims questions. anyway, all these events always become ordinary people. here is a question from my observations. maybe give advice to people, uh, who, uh, want to overthrow the government, but they can’t uh, for sure to say in what they can shout it, who want changes, but not the ability to formulate. what should be these changes that idealize the west but have never been there in my life. uh, in my mind , these people seem to me to be victims of circumstances, victims of these technologies, for you to advise them on this. of course i think they are. i agree that they are victims, but you know, it's very important here that these are our people. i'm against demonization. i am

against the demonization of such opponents, it is young people who often become victims completely not conscious, but false strategies. she takes a chimera or a myth for reality. she doesn't know the price. hmm real no life, no death, infidelity, no betrayal. ah. geopolitical ideas are the historical ideas of young people, often very roughly they are greedy for all sorts of pro pictures on tags on memes on and those tools. yes, external to the surface of minutes on a fragmentary one, they can not build such a consistent narrative. order some picture they have no alignment and they become a victim manipulation is another matter that in the modern west it has succeeded so much in

manipulating, especially young people, seducing them, seducing them, pushing them into a variety of more-more diverse spheres of the fall of the moral birth of sin. up to the most radical forms that can strike the immature consciousness, that in this way they cling to them, they pull them up and they manipulate them and it is very, very difficult to fight this directly, it is very, very difficult, some alternative models because they are, well it's like the devil. he is sophisticated, he is diverse. he comes up with new and new strategies. ah, goodness remains the same it's simple it's eternal it may seem boring good in comparison, but evil is inventive in this respect too. i believe that this is a challenge for belarus and for russia we owe our traditional deep christian

values ​​to the values ​​of justice. we must learn to broadcast to this young generation. often we do it clumsily and do not do it at all, and then we are surprised that they become victims of the enemy because marriage actually turns them into tools. this is the most delicate thing. that's what we need ideology without ideology for. we won't make it. we need our own deep, intelligible sometimes complex and at the same time all understandable. for the vast majority. ideologies, thanks to this, we will be able to win the battle for youth otherwise , if we only turn to history, to the past, to veterans, to those values ​​that are characteristic of the older generation. it's like working for a while because that's sanity and traditional values. most healthy people still prevail, but with young people we must speak a different language. it seems to me that we have not fully developed this language, neither in

belarus nor in russia, and in fact, partly the fact that our youth becomes easy prey for the enemy - this is from e to blame for this. and we ourselves, we didn't delve into, uh, their views. we have not decoded them. we just hmm so maybe not being sensitive enough to their submissions. we them discarded and uh, became uh, made sacrifices to the enemy. and the enemy is already theirs, there is no emptiness there, if it were remembered completely, therefore in my opinion. uh, those who are the enemy, for example, a and putin well, we have quite a few of them, and lukashenka of belarus is also not enough. that's among the youth, but they still exist, it's some kind of existence. the percentage that is considered obsolete is different and can not be yes, yes, but we must fight for every soul. uh, because this is very important, that is, we should not

just suppress suppress. we have to criminal or absolutely such illegality. we must work with them and work more flexibly in this regard. it seems to me that neither moscow nor minsk is yet to show results. we need, uh, minsk as a follower, and sometimes moscow often, on the contrary, brings the situation to the extreme, all all permissiveness, and then are forced to resort to the most radical measures. that's very important all the same, but opponents or those, like who, whom they caught. this is the globalist, and the man and the hateful west are one of them. for- like a soul, like an apostle, s nets caught the souls of people, we need we need the souls of our youth, so that they return. to our values, so that they remember what is the motherland, what is tradition, what is belarus what is russia who are we what are the religious spiritual historical roots and the

more our people know our history understand our values ​​understand our traditions, the less chances for them to become victims of the enemy, but for this we ourselves must be so. we ourselves must know our own meanings. we ourselves must be truly belarusians and russians are precisely ideological people, russians are ideologically not only by blood, but by meanings by choice by value, just like belarusians, and this struggle for the new generation, from which it is recruited mainly, and the opposition in belarus and russia kind of. here the struggle for it is a challenge. if we ca n't be convincing enough, it will be very difficult in the future. yes, and now it’s not easy for us, and in the future it will not be easy at all, therefore. i think that, uh, that's what ideology is for, and this is ideology should be very, very inclusive. if you like, she must include, she must e have something to say, even to those who

are today by mistake today by mistake our opponents. after all, these are our children, our children, whom we did not raise up to, did not look at, did not explain to them. something did not pay due attention to them, we lost them and their wau was caught by our enemies and the enemies of the human race. this is a battle for our children. these are not some outsiders who come out to protests who want to demolish the government, these are our children, whom we they missed it with children too. despite all the strictness that they sometimes demand, you still need to act very delicately, very subtly, flexibly and efficiently. thanks a lot. thank you for this wonderful interview for these wonderful answers. thank you, please, thank you.

we follow the sports life of our country during a difficult period for the entire belarusian football , it is important, without arranging something to lament, to undertake the construction of such stadiums. this is an amazing phenomenon and the quality of football will increase transmission, please can more,

rather let us know how new heights are reached. we use them to possess the physical abilities of islam and help keep ourselves in shape, but after all, moderate physical activity helps to cope with many problems . removed from the city mitusni here is your face and your strength. truth perrot bones up to myself