[000:00:00;00] according to the international committee of the red cross, millions of people are literally razed to the ground in certain regions of the series, now 90% of syrians live in poverty, 2/3 depend on humanitarian aid, and more than half, that is, over 9 million, suffer from lack of food. according to the report commissions. un popular discontent, not only turned into a ten-year civil war, but also led to mass crimes. including genocide war crime crime against humanity, including genocide and numerous violations of international humanitarian law have accompanied the syrian conflict since it began in march 11. according to the report, the perpetrators go unpunished, that in the end your race was helped by the allies, and washington withdrew its troops from the country in 2018 officially defeated isis in fact, of course , lost

the arab spring provoked immediately. two hotbeds of conflict libya and syria, civil wars broke out in 2011 on both fronts at once, and the united states did not even change the methodology , the principle of action was the only one to overthrow, power and establish their regime as a public kazyu, libyan, moammar leader, gaddafi the us has shown how far they can go to achieve the same in syria and eliminate the bashar. assad failed, however fighting . the war did not end there. in the series, there are still about ten clans and parties according to the libyan scenario. still shooting and trying to take territory. and here is the igil? still in place. at least weakened. as you understand, the general welfare is again postponed indefinitely throughout. e of how these conflict continue in america has changed three administrations. and each had its own watering. that is, if obama is everything, well, in general , he supported uh, the trumps were very

indifferent to this and in general. she was trying to deal with the big us exodus from the middle east, except for a couple of hits. e missile on syria did not particularly undertake this attitude of this country. that's it with biden. ah, well, most likely trump's policy continues. although there are some attempts to get involved in this situation too. speaking in simple terms, they trampled the middle east and washed their hands hopes for a better youth, which were the core of the protests, did not materialize unemployment remains the highest in the world speech about the war-torn series libya yemen corruption also did not win, on the contrary, according to the world bank in the countries mentioned above , the situation only worsened admit it, albeit quite modestly. even the global american think tanks, 10 years after the upheavals of the arab spring, the council on foreign relations analyzed how the countries of the arab world developed before and

after the big upheavals, the conclusion turned out to be the disappointing process of democratic change has led to a significant decline in living standards virtually everywhere, while washington subjugated the countries of the third world in order to maintain global leadership, the state plunged into the abyss of chaos of poverty and devastation. the organization is considered to be one of the most powerful private structures for influencing us foreign policy, but natural analysts kept silent about the fact that the overseas curators of the arab spring about ordinary people and did not think that the doctrine of controlled chaos had completely different tasks to extract their benefits from destabilization and advance their interests take possession of the territory resources create new zones of influence no color revolution has yet improved the situation of those who succumbed to western bait and went out into the streets to break their old life. i hope this is clear now.

happily. one good evening good evening is hard to believe, but this is your first time on our project , usually if there are a lot of speakers to express their opinion on a wide range of issues, it is quite difficult without limitation. it's real for us. so, an economist, a political scientist, an analyst, and all this on a voluntary basis. here, considering your increased media coverage. many people think that you are on the payroll here at bt here. let's go straight. you participate in our program for free for public and media activities, you never received money and even refused

when some fees were offered, but i’m not interested then why does it exist or vadim barak is a small contradiction, we start broadcasting, nothing personal personal question therefore i will answer. as for sizes, i don't ask, i'm the lucky one. i have been running my own small business since i was young. it does not allow to have a fairly comfortable standard of living and not depend on any other sources of income. however, what is the advantage? i do n't have a boss, so i have a freer schedule. i can devote more time to my own health, personal life, communication with loved ones, sports, what i love, creativity, and communication with the media . therefore, this format suits me quite well and, uh, in general. i consider myself lucky in this context. that is, and most importantly, it allows you to say what you think, yes , this is very important. listen, very

many of our opponents, being on the payroll far away. uh, not ready to say what they think, because i will immediately cut the fee. nobody pays me, so my views are sincere. for myself, i have determined certain relations to the authorities in the country to the first person. and this is a sincere position. good. well, let's talk about your views from the president's confidant to the increase in points for the admission of a virgin. well, the truth is, let 's say this is such a difference. so you personally do not offend. this is a cliché that can sometimes be heard in relation to boletus, belarusian zhirinovsky first time and forever. i am a belarusian borovik, despite the fact that the surname, by the way, is also well-known, despite the fact that i was familiar with vladimir volfovich, we talked. i consider a smart person, by the way, speaking they talked when he did not allow himself to make wrong

statements about belarus. in many values, uh, and political views, i do not coincide with him, so i respect his intellect, but our views are quite different regarding. uh, that's what you asked me about, uh from a confidant, firstly, a little bit of such a formulation of the question, as if i, from the status of a confidant of the president, left for discussion. firstly, i think that the activities that i conducted after the elections, namely, i had the honor to communicate with the head of state, to offer responsibility for calls for sanctions against belarus and there were other opportunities to voice a certain position , worked on documents that subsequently resulted in normative acts and

today such responsibility is introduced. and was awarded the gratitude of the head of state, so i hope and expect that the confidence of the president. i didn't lose. i am a confidant of the president not in the understanding of the electoral legislation, but i count on the fact that the president can trust me and can count on me regarding the subject itself. and this is very important. listen, as an experienced medical specialist, including in working with the mass consciousness, you understand that this is manipulation from a fairly long 13 -minute conversation with grigory azarenka, and extremist channels, but pulled out the context. deleted my disclaimer that i was exaggerating and tried out an uh short sentence. eh, shoot a clip and distribute it on the internet, all kinds of polls and nonsense. in fact, the question was very serious,

which i am raising, and now i will explain to you why we recently talked, er, full fedor petrovich, and in smolensk, he participated in certain discussions together with me. i was pleased when we exchanged views that we have a common position, we sympathize with each other and it ’s interesting for us, but these are the approaches that we bring to society. he is preaching. i speak out as a public figure, so here are the approaches that we outlined, namely, questions of morality, questions of how we come to the young audience today and how this affects the behavior of our young people, the president spoke about this at an open lesson and today we see new trends in the education system of licensing private preschool education. we see that today a very serious issue is being addressed to the issue of personnel training in the education system,

so i work for the country. i am responsible for my words and i don’t say anything just like that on the air, and if i sent a message on something. attention, so this topic deserves, from my point of view, closer attention, and speculation is the lot of the weak. let him speculate. and we, as they say, our caravan will go on , the most interesting thing is that in fact, even in this torn-out context, absolutely nothing at all. it definitely wasn't. this is my personal opinion, but at least for another moment, let's move on. this is what i like to suggest. here you are an officer and an officer, listen, there used to be a benefit for people who served when entering universities. here the boletus suggests you can fix it, listen, we have a problem today with your hands in schools. today we do not have enough young good teachers in certain disciplines. and what 's wrong if a guy? and if he goes through training in the ranks of the armed forces, we will train him as a

political scientist, there will be military training, and somewhere we will work with his intellect. then he will enter the appropriate educational an institution on benefits and a young one will come. a knowledgeable military department, and a person, will communicate with young people correctly, even if even our dear solovyov, having seen enough or heard enough about belarus, speak completely specifically, what needs to be urgently introduced into the e-e nvp to return to school. why slowly okay but for the sake of hype? we will not build the whole conversation. yes? i understand, great times do not choose already they live and die. let's therefore conduct our conversation today in different vectors and seriously. here on these weekends, many belarusians, well, first of all, the sword. yes, they saw military aircraft fighters over their heads, 31, in my opinion, yes, they arrived to reinforce the joint grouping of echelons, and so on, some of this

stressed others calmed down. how did you personally react? well, i worked at the dacha on a personal plot near minsk, they directly flew over me. i considered two types of fighters, perhaps the maneuvers were carried out by one type of fighter. maybe i made a mistake quite calmly, you need to understand that we have the appropriate agreements in within the union state. the conditions under which the deployment of a joint grouping of troops is carried out and what e-e means of technical support - this grouping is indicated. it may intensify today, the head of state clearly. he indicated that the situation was serious. it requires close attention of the power bloc of the allied state, this is due to the technical strengthening of our deployable grouping, so this is an absolutely normal phenomenon, it is better to preempt than, so to speak, then

act sacredly, so we worked for preemption. this is the correct position. that is, it does not bother you, it calms you down. it 's okay. that is, you understand, you don’t need to strain, you need to act in cold blood in, uh, emergency situations. today the situation is quite serious because of excessive nervousness. we will lose everything, so we must act calmly and in cold blood, realizing that we were still engaged in our armed forces, we signed the relevant agreements and at the moment the belarusian power bloc is in control of the situation in the country, therefore, we will make all necessary efforts in order to ensure a peaceful sky over belarus vladimir on the other hand, the formation of joint groupings. this is always a conversation about possible sabotage. well , naturally. here, probably, now there is a moment of people's work, whose service, as they say, is dangerous and difficult. here is for ordinary citizens. she is not visible. yes, counterterrorism measures. they must go unnoticed. it's okay

if it's professional, but a series of terrorist attacks has already been prevented. and you yourself saw probably that the price of someone else's life of belarusians, for some it is only 500 dollars. that same week, the delay of the gang of autohovich was set for a serious time, and again a plan of peromog arises. for 2 years people have not been taught anything. today, the relevant structures, uh, are doing very serious work. this is due not only to the use of technical means for conducting remote surveillance, both on the internet and working with mobile and other devices, but serious intelligence and operational work is being carried out, therefore, citizens, who are involved in such processes in terrorist activities,

anti-constitutional activities should understand that the harsh time will be the corresponding responsibility. that is why it is worth refraining from any illegal actions. sooner or later we will be able to bring to justice all persons who threaten our national security. and one more important aspect of the special services. the power block is working, but the vigilance of ordinary belarusians is very important today. you need to pay attention to what programs and what resources your children use today, where you are invited, what you are offered to do, how your life is assessed. if you see that some suspicious groups have appeared in your locality, or some activity that is not characteristic of this region is being carried out , you must immediately inform law enforcement agencies in the hands of belarusians. security. we must be responsible for the world that we

must value today and must preserve. logically. look, against belarus, in fact, a war has been unleashed for a long time, you can call quasi-hybrid there in different ways, whatever you like, informational, but the president’s rhetoric is obviously justified more than justified and justifies these measures to strengthen security, which are now being taken, the degree of tension does not subside at the borders. poland the baltics are being pumped up with troops and weapons are taking place on the territory of eastern europe now nine exercises with the combined forces of the nato bloc and on monday launched nuclear exercises in general. allegedly planned, so what are these plans in your opinion, i will explain. here are the first two aspect. first aspect if you want, present someone's plans. there is such a simple one.

analyst reception. you have to understand which side is most beneficial, i mean sar, if this country has the means to achieve this goal and the price that the side will pay for achieving this goal will be significantly lower than the result. we are with you today. we clearly understand that this process, which is unfolding at our borders. there are specific benesars. right now, for this, we must designate the subjects of all these processes. the first is the beneficiaries and initiators. it is the uk and the us they are the main beneficiaries. their task is to destabilize the european union even in the first place, because it was a competitor in terms of reserve currency. today, they have the opportunity to buy certain assets of a european-made company, transfer production to north america and, well, increase their influence. as they say, according to the principle of divide and power, even the preservation of the

european union as an international entity is in question. this is their task today successfully carried out. these are the initiators and indirect participants - the organizers. this, then, the procedure has direct participants. the russian federation as an independent entity and ukraine as an instrument means that in the hands of the metropolis, which is a strike force, using primarily human and resources to cause maximum damage to the russian federation, are there countries of the european union? which unfortunately is in a serious dependence and vulnerable position. the task of the united states of america is to draw them into this conflict of their the task of unleashing a war in europe is to expand the regional conflict and the next task is to weaken it. china will prevent

any serious formations on the eurasian continent. and to prevent the development of such organizations as, for example, the sco, that is, to restrain their development. therefore, this whole program of action of the anglo-saxons, unfortunately today, as i see it, is being implemented in many respects, and when our allies admire it. and how much damage and damage has been done to the infrastructure. in ukraine , the other side admires that. which one with damage it was caused by a settlement already under the control of the russian federation. either we rejoice, more precisely, we are not separate brilliant minds that e is falling , e, the standard of living in europe and it will freeze, but this is the anglo-saxon plan. that is, today it is being clearly implemented; they use contradictions within the framework. e international organizations. they use control, the international financial system. and today.

and if you ask the question what are the plans plans to make war in europe this plan is very clear they have implemented their first plan. and this special us military operation in europe, i spoke about this in january of this year. i said that we should not succumb to the provocation of the united states, how did he do it? china by the way, saying, china dragged into the war was the task of withdrawing china and russia this is the un security to weaken china to limit its economic development two aspects to close markets and solve microchips. china immediately about to sag. why is china behaving cautiously today? why didn’t china take it, because they understand, they won’t be able to carry it out, so to speak my. economic expansion, as soon as it receives sanctions from the americans and european european markets, so the situation is quite complicated today,

unfortunately, we were provoked. and even if we were forced, i'm talking about russia we are not directly participating in this operation to take part in this military operation. too bad we were led to this. think about it today, the two most powerful powers of the former soviet union, russia and the forty. millions of ukraine destroy mutually their own potential will be a huge demographic the failure of everything that is destroyed there will have to be restored, we have already been restrained and discarded in development. we have already suffered enormous economic damage. this has already taken place de facto already today russia's weakened positions will be in the dkb. today, the role of a number of other states in the region is being strengthened in turkey. this is a fact, we must reckon with this, the analysis should be correct, thank god that it makes me happy that we have already left, otherwise the cheers of patriotic statements on russian television have become a clearer analysis. this is the stuffing of the usa about 3 days - this is stuffing

american intelligence, which was broadcast by russian federal channels. it was a huge mistake not to prepare. e reserves, starting such an operation, do not prepare the necessary reserves in order to strengthen, if necessary, understand, therefore, today we must clearly assess the situation, understand its danger and make very cold-blooded decisions. and one more important point. i have spoken about this more than once, so we met in the editors' club. until we can effectively, uh, create problems for the anglo-saxons. they will try us, uh, and now there are such attempts to put pressure on us further and further. this is a mutual settlement in national currencies attempt. uh, strengthen the role of the sco, which means avoiding savings in dollars, euros, and so on, a number of aspects in the agreements within the framework of guardianships, and so on, that is, it cannot be said that we are not inactive,

that the russian federation is helpless and inactive today on a number of aspects retaliatory measures, but so far they are not enough to become a turning point in the course of this confrontation and the situation is very dangerous. look here once. you have already touched. yes, that is, i agree with the message that it is not just necessary to analyze, but to use the opportunities that exist. and the possibilities. there is, of course, the president. designated uprising yes key phrase. the time has come for asia and it is very important not to miss this time. it's true, this is the week, she obviously gives the eastern vector yes, the congress of the communist party of china everyone was waiting for it. everyone was waiting for this ping to speak, and it showed that the leader of china is full of energy and, most importantly, he clearly understands the strategy that china should implement, that is, this is an application on world leadership and an alternative to the western

model of development, that is, the position of sympathy for taiwan clearly indicates opposition to the west. here's what to expect after this congress, in your opinion, russia and us here. the first thing i can tell you one hundred percent, do not expect hasty decisions from china, you know, sometimes, when communicating with russian colleagues. they have one quality that prevents, uh, from achieving their goals. they sometimes a-a do not put themselves in the place of the counterparty. sometimes they perceive this rhetoric that well, of course, will support us, of course, now they will take it together. we will go somewhere china has its own interests in the world as a whole our interests. russia , china and belarus coincide with our main interest. we want to build a more harmonious system of international relations. this is our main interest. uh, we are in favor of the concept of global leadership. the americans are in favor of the

concept of global dominance, that is, very global domination, that is, the metropolis and satellites. we offer leaders and strong partners nearby. it's over correct concept. the only thing that china today and we must clearly understand is that e does not have the ability to quickly maneuver. it's true, well, that is, we must clearly understand how fast ours are. partners in international dialogue are able to get involved in certain processes. first, china is very seriously tied to the eu and the us market, no matter how much we want it to be tied and the volume of trade is comparable even with russia, this is many times inferior to the volume of trade with the russian federation with the same united states, the european union, second, china's serious dependence on microchip microcircuits, even the fact that china makes it absolutely several generations and is not enough for an intensively developing economy, which means china, therefore, naturally,

they will bend their own line. they will strengthen their influence through the sco. they will take. uh, such a low-key position, where they will provide, well, some support to the russian federation and try not to aggravate their relations. as long as it is possible to extract interests from cooperation. e with the collective west. it's for them too a vital necessity, that is, quickly turn it off. yeah, such a vector is huge, and economic interaction is impossible in principle. this is an objective fact, therefore , expect that today china will join in some kind of intense phase of confrontation. no, because confrontation implies maneuvering, you understand, a military operation should not make the state weaker. you see, the essence of a military operation and any essence of any process. stas is stronger as a result. if you are a result of this or that operation

or this or that geopolitical decision become weaker and expose your own safety. some vulnerabilities. these are pointless actions. here in china it demonstrates. wisdom. i, uh, sympathize with the policy of china and they provoked him to whip it in this sheltered strip in taiwan, but listen, they ignored it. there were their tough statements by the americans, to some extent, they showed that today in this region, to one degree or another, they can all allow somewhere to behave not delicately. well , china ignored it, because they compared the losses from the escalation of economic yeah, but geopolitical losses with what they can still extract at the current stage of development from the fact that the situation will have a status quo. well, not prepare for this and possibly in the future, because they removed the issue of taiwan from the agenda. no, on the contrary. well, this was done during the pre-election campaign, it is necessary,

including pre-election rhetoric, but, nevertheless , this issue is acute for china and they will resolve this issue, but they will decide when they have enough strength to you will solve me with small losses for own economy and security. well , let's see, i'm the only thing i'm afraid of. these are provocations on the part of the states in order to initiate this separation themselves. taiwan of course, this is what they are doing. now a process will begin in europe somewhat uncontrollable, okay, if with the chinese elections everything is more or less clear, yes, then the situation with the midterm elections to the us congress, in my opinion, the biden voters, a little unstable charmed, have long become disappointed and have long been disappointed in the elections themselves does not pour. yes, here's what to expect elections on november 8, congress must be influenced. now listen to influence again. yes, and so they accused that the president intervened. we have become accustomed to the fact that our western

colleagues constantly participate in our elections. directly financing certain political forces, working through special services , creating uh, certain uh, reconnaissance sabotage groups, even we, of course, proceed from the norms of international law and not everything we have to voice here on the air, but everything that the foreign service can do today intelligence of russia is the rubber that is in the us that public sector. all methods must be used in order to influence the outcome of the choice. the first and second should be used, including those means of influencing critical infrastructure facilities, which today we see a demonstration that they are doing this. as if you should never pull the blanket over yourself and admit who did what, but you need to influence and the next moment. today we see that, after all, the republicans in matters of financing a ukrainian company more restrained. well, at least the pre-

election rhetoric is more restrained, at least trump behaved more diligently, the future president, if today, from the point of view of national security issues, the position of the republicans is more beneficial. should do everything to the republicans. with this position they got the majority and with this position they reduced subsidies to the ukrainian economy. that's all we need to influence in the way that we can, if we cannot influence, well, then we must then tighten our belts and watch how your seditious speeches are said by this visonovich. to me really like. yes, apparently, i probably went to the same plane a long time ago, thank god yes, i love, well, we communicate with you because of and not on the air, and we are in many ways like-minded. actually. it was a huge omission, i agree that as soon as the heirs of the soviet union stopped working on the external circuit, which i also spoke about at the club. yes, we immediately got the problem at home,

of course we must understand. here you are absolutely right. when you let this or that contractor work in your field and create he has problems. he can nominate it to a greater extent, yes, today, well done , they began to work with international ones. with that system they are trying to knock out the main trump. but so far , i see very futile attempts so far, have not yet come. at the beginning of the journey, we said, at the beginning of the journey, to say with vain fears. at least opponents. we have already called such god yes, but we must move in the absolutely right direction. this is the main step. yes , because the economy is at the heart of everything. let's talk a little more about the forecast. that's for a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge. and this is the insane joy that the leadership of ukraine demonstrated without hiding. kulyaba boasted directly on the air, but they did it. we well , some citizens of ukraine, too, seemed to be lit up with this crazy joy, you can say russia is responsible for this harshly and

has been responsible for the past week, such actions may look like a coercive operation. to peace and negotiations, well, they think so in november the g20 themselves in fabulous bali yes, of course, fate may well be decided there, if not the world redistribution, then at least there will be a chance for negotiations. here's to your point of view. can we hope for the adequacy of the world community there? a very difficult situation, firstly, of course, russia is trying to strengthen its contractual position and, so to speak, is making more weighty arguments in order to incline the collective smell to negotiations. naturally, we understand that, unfortunately, ukraine will not make a decision on negotiations on its own. she needs to get washington's sanction and the position of the world community

will change, despite the fact that the g20 the decision will be on the negotiations to take the two countries. these are washington and london, and there will be some other consultation statements. and how is his opinion that only russia, the united states, and that’s all can agree. well, that's what i'm talking about, that is, there may be consultation statements on some issue of regional cooperation and some additional impact. even turkey can contribute something to some kind of negotiation process. cool down a bit the ardor of the politicians in the south, but, on the whole, agree. eh, only if it means so, the goodwill of the united states of america that for this to happen they must understand that the absence of negotiations for them can cause more damage more damage than the escalation of the conflict. today, obama spoke about this the other day, saying that escalation is dangerous,

because it can really lead. uh, there is a real threat to the confrontation pit. it cannot be ruled out, but for now, what should you understand from what the united states of america seeks many do not understand? many people think that they want to fight with someone some kind of capture territory directly with troops to moscow and the task is to destabilize the socio-political situation in russia to bring the situation to the times. so, here's the uh decay. union when there was no one even to press the button, in principle, you understand, that is, such economic instability should ripen, that is, the delay in this operation will still lead to curbing the economic development of russia, which means that already mobilized zinc hornbeams will go around. this will also put some pressure on the mood. in society. this prolongation of the conflict is the fatigue from this conflict. war weariness will, uh, mean to heat up the socio-political situation in russia, their

task is to destabilize this situation and u take russia uh, v. the principle is to bring the situation to the point where the political leadership will no longer be able to make such decisions with minimal effort. flesh, by the way, speaking, and we should pay attention to it. i think that the liquidation of the first persons is being considered, who are they about it, how at least they have already begun to speak and the issue of liquidation of the first persons is being considered. well, look in your time polish. uh, leadership, almost everyone died in a plane crash. maybe it was an incident. and perhaps it was. look how the rhetoric of the government changed when it changed in many respects the position of poland poland completely fell under the united states again and who benefits right? yes, poland completely fell under the united states, so you understand, uh, the situation is very serious and until they see that escalation is not beneficial for them. they are will strengthen it, and they are now doing everything for this. we must always remember the politicians in the class, how russia cannot be defeated from the outside, it can only be bred from the

inside. well, therefore, let's hope that our actions are inside. they just correspond to the correct approach. well, look, on tuesday the president met with the russian philosopher dugin. a very interesting meeting a new term that i heard for myself the sixth column in russia is just what we are talking about, yes, the president called them liberals, and dugin noted that in belarus they didn't show up. that's why. listen, we also had fetuses. uh, glory. by god , the president has created an unprecedented system of internal control in belarus, that is, in the service of security. there is another security service. this is a quiet latent work, and in fact, all authorities in the country are very transparent to us and they see, so to speak, certain processes and anticipate, from the point of view of logistics, a more compact country. it’s easier to manage a smaller corruption component , which has a corruption

component, even a big business did not become. oligarchic, it is not associated with the withdrawal of capital from the authorities. uh, equates to especially large. here is the capital to the most serious crimes. it is not necessary to voice it, everyone understands it, and yet. belarus as a state, well, consequently, through the first person controls all financial flows in the country, control over the economy is control over the political system, therefore, in this regard, we have a cleaner model that is more fair because when the state controls the economy. this is the people after all who is lukashenka this is, uh, a collective people to whom delegated powers and, accordingly, since they have the opportunity to control economic and political processes through certain institutions, it means that the belarusian people control these processes in the country, glory. to god at the moment, we, in this regard, will say more

successfully, i know when i remember about success in the economy and about the absence of an oligarchy. one example is very indicative in its time, in my opinion, for risks. uh privatized in russia for 100 85 million dollars. in the twenty-first year alone, they received a net profit of five billion in the 21st alone. i'm not talking about the fact that it has been on a permanent basis for all 20 years. it’s good that we didn’t go through this, this is from the contrast , after all, m-th residents of certain regions of the standard of living of the infrastructure that was created for them, access to gas, communications to roads and the contrast, and how certain persons who received property for a pittance he lives, too, uh, destabilizes the situation and undermines confidence in the authorities. here it is very important that in this was not the case in belarus, the second question that was raised at the meeting of the president with the philosopher dugin. it is also a very

important issue for us. we have been approaching this issue in one form or another for 20 years, the president yesterday. this one more time. uh, marked yes belarusian ideology. that's how many copies were broken and how the president designated nothing better than marxism-leninism, for example, yes, we have it on our territory. yes, we are not the only ones, we have not created, mind you, new ideologies. they never showed up. nowhere liberalism europe has turned into totalitarianism, the conservatism of even catholic countries began to justify the planting of the lgbt ideology as mandatory. and nationalism, using the example of the baltic states or ukraine as a whole, has already become ordinary fascism. vladimir alexandrovich, why now no country in the world can boast of a new,

well-formulated and understandable ideology that is in demand among people. well, firstly, in order to understand these processes, any ideological concept is experiencing its birth. rise of the renaissance and dc decline. here is the western concept - this is the unshakable right of private property, the priority of individual rights over interesting ones, even sometimes the state. and that is the desire for monstkoy hedonism good existence. and he, in many ways, this concept is outdated, that is, and she had a renaissance, he had excellent means of delivery, ranging from control of the international e and information space to hollywood. and this concept was very pleasant, convenient digestible, but it was broken by the real one. here, yes, the rights of the individual, we saw how they can and same second be, limited

ownership. today we can use the example of russia's property of a number of other states of the world. this is now we are talking about russia, because many states of the world were subject to confiscation of property and assets, that is, elections. on the use of this right, if we are talking, uh, we are talking about a liberal idea with you, a conservative idea. well, listen, what a conservative idea of ​​a country where abortion was once banned, a country where some kind of adultery was unacceptable in in general. today we see that e facts of pedophilia. uh, in the parishes of the catholic church already, and the pope allows same-sex marriages, and blesses this, of course, there is no question of supporting it. one side. this can be envisaged as an adaptation of e -concepts to the modern stage, yes, adaptation, but this other concept levels out the concepts are not accepted. i'm working with a foreign contingent. i can say that a lot

of foreigners are ready to leave countries where these concepts of sodomy are being imposed concerning us. our concepts are really a ship, which does not have a specific course, where and why we are going. that's why we are where we are conducting a military operation with russia, this ship does not have a tailwind, you understand, it is not enough to formulate. so i said this to our russian colleagues that while conducting a military operation on your territory. we provide our own, uh, national security interests, clearly, but for this territory. this is incomprehensible. where next? what's next for the next year after the victory? for this, the concept must mature you see, alexander grigoryevich is right. what can not be taken? it is natural to write to the knee to some very smart educated person, and then, how to hammer in higher mathematics smart, this concept should evoke. it must lie on the soul of society

, it must be accepted, and it must be efficient. there is a complication also about this. it is necessary to say that the russian federation and belarus have slightly different views on these processes. we often have these views. so they tried to grind, we try to explain and this is a more sober position, which hmm is possible, great russia with strong sovereign allies, and it will be a much stronger union than, uh, the incorporated state of this or that state, our concept is more sober, if this is the concept of the union, what we are demonstrating today, how we lend each other a shoulder today . uh, the last decades. i prevailed, then russia would have fewer problems in the dkb, there would have been fewer problems with central asia and it would have been easier on this one. uh, the allies would line up, uh, in line

to help. and when we saw a little today approaches in some way, uh, encouraging not quite healthy moods within certain national republics. this results in centrifugal rather than center impetuous forces. so here is our task. if we are talking about a union state, formulate a concept that will allow us to give the union state a centripetal force. i have said more than once during the period of trade wars in the period. e not quite healthy statements you give an example of the late zhirinovsky instagram enough to feed. the caucasus cannot be spoken of as national state such a statement. who is fighting today? who is efficient today? how could it be so insulting the peoples of russia is not permissible the same as we will not feed in belarus - this is an insult to russia no one will ever feed anyone, we must formulate this concept in such a way that we

complement each other. we are becoming stronger within the framework of the union state, and from the closest political military economic union between russia and belarus, the sovereignty of belarus is only strengthening, then a queue will line up for us. and you know what i want to tell you so, we will confirm that our concept is effective and our social political model is effective. when our regional and international structures are lined up, very understand, so far we have no queue. there is a question. as soon as their queue there will be lined up. so we formulated it and so we put it on proved that this concept of efficiency meant not only our foreign policy, the union state, its effectiveness and viability. yes. we are must remember, probably, and the internal component. and here you are even more right than i agree about belarus, and now i liked this day. uh, the seventeenth of national unity day is great.

they told a story. you see, the president is absolutely right. no need to go to the king of peas and remember where the borders were. today was a good expression. in fact, now it is and it is necessary, and with this it is necessary to account. yes , there is such a state, and you will reckon with it, no one ever has the right reproach the state for not having the right to the right of subjectivity by force. eh, less or more than the territory or year of formation of this or that state, if we begin to deal with such issues, then we will plunge the whole of europe and the whole world, all of humanity, into the forest of wars of contradictions and conflicts. this is an absolutely flawed position. she is unacceptable. she is anti-human and she is not again a concept that allows you to unite. you see, vladimir vladimirovich recently met with sendguchim, where did

he start the dialogue? the europeans don’t understand, that it is beneficial for them to work with the russian federation, that the americans artificially manipulate and still they will return to cooperation. and if he said and respect must respect respect rahmon knowingly worried about respect, dear president of tajikistan, that is, this is the respect that worthy russia requires respect. uh, vladimir vladimirovich once said that the americans at the negotiating table are very and therefore respectful. uh, are negotiating the appropriate procedures. uh, use, uh, then around the corner pats on the shoulder and says, do as we say and also exchanged for something that shows disrespect. naturally, the economic should be taken into account. uh, the influence of the state must be taken into account. but mutual respect is also a concept that allows countries to find a common language. here is ours, belarus, if we

talk about our ideology, they quietly formulate, uh, a national concept. you said we don't have anything. this is also wrong. after all, look at the constitution , we have fixed for certain approaches to the family attitude to religion attitude to the formation of authorities. that is, we have taken certain steps towards the formation of a national idea artificially, that's how the creation of a party cannot be created from the outside on sit down and say. here you will have three four parties. let's support them. none of them will go there. it will be artificially created organizations. also ideology. we have to suffer a little, but i see that today and here you probably agree with me that the leader's role in the formation of logit is a big one. the role of the leader who can formulate it, or through , uh, a group of people, through his mouth and lead himself to confirm, uh, the validity of the ideological doctrine with specific actions, a specific attitude. and so i hope that alexander grigorievich is with him.

uh, there is appropriate authority and support in the coming years, but this national idea is still with the help of experts with the help of the community. you will crystallize the belarusian society and we will have it. in this show, participants and spectators are waiting for tricky questions fermented milk drink from mare milk, what is it called? and why are you whispering something from me is your answer. nobody watched the simpsons, very cool. then. come up with a city and call it

intuition, the main erudition. it will definitely come in handy here. so this is the abduction of europe. this is how it looks to you. well, in some pictures, of course, it looks better, but what we have is amazing. this is the correct answer. in case of an incorrect answer. we'll have to go to the setting. think well before you say it, and one more element is a 99.9 tower, how a dna test won’t work, watch the tower intellectually entertaining project on belarus 24 tv channel. leather hero maya , the children sculpt something there, not a repeated history of life and creativity of becoming, yes, but for me it was so natural, but blind me, but i i blinded you, but i stuck authority to the whole group. i instantly took off. and years is what beats them new. i'm bloody waiting to

realize my full potential when i'm pouring resin. in this silicone form, i myself can’t fully imagine what will happen with the reverse side, and and every time it's wow, it's delight and i want to do it. also, a well- known generation to give their lives without end to the right. with amazement, this is my son now. uh, it doesn’t even help me, i try to change the situation so that i help him, so that he is the director of the belarusian project about people. which ones they stumble with with their paddles, since i fell in love with this resin. i just live, i breathe, look after her on the tv channel. belarus on the 20th anniversary of the 100th anniversary, which in general today is the

national library of belarus, the largest in in the country, we are the leading scientific institution in the field of comedy bibliography and biography, as well as the scientific focal point for the public libraries of our country. today. the library is the largest informational socio-cultural center in the first place, of course. it is the largest repository of knowledge we store. no more than about 10.5 million different types of documents, these are books, newspapers, magazines. uh, maps, posters, abstracts and dissertations, uh, and other documents in eighty languages ​​of the world are at our disposal today. users 17 spacious e-reading rooms, which are equipped for the study of all types of documents according to their technical equipment. today the library is not inferior to , uh, the leading libraries. e mira, e our complex of technological systems

includes both scanning equipment and restoration equipment equipment. e for publishing today we publish on the basis of the library. uh, our publishing center publishes, uh, two scientific collections, we also have our own, uh, library light magazine, which is celebrating its 26th anniversary this year. and, of course, it is impossible not to talk about ours and the socio-cultural component at the base. libraries. we hold today more than 220 events of various levels every year we hold more than 30 art and more than 150 book exhibitions in the library exhibition complex. today is located on 3.500 m², which allows us to exhibit. er, over 600 artworks. and today in the library. uh function uh children's room where you can bring child, when working with literature several times a week we hold various activities with children and in the library. you

can even celebrate your birthday. e with a child. here. and, of course, we have, uh, a museum. book museum, where you can get acquainted with the most valuable publications that are stored in the library funds. well, today the library is probably the only institution in the country that includes and includes a sports and recreation complex. uh this and uh, gym area and 200 m² modern equipment and even a sauna. well, how many books of documents are in the collections of the national library, what is rich in the total fund of about ten and a half million documents, of course, er, the pearl of our collection is the fund of manuscripts of rare violin documents, which we have more than 90,000 items. eh, the most. uh, earlier the manuscript, which is the library. this is the discoverer of the true sunnah arab group, which adapts the 14th

century, the most interesting and valuable edition of the manuscript of belarusian origin is a secret secret or aristotle's brother, which dates from the end of xv to the beginning of the xvi centuries. uh, we have a library. uh, the most valuable thing we can offer is 10 editions of the bible and francis skoryn, which formed the basis of belarusian book printing. well, we also have the first lifetime edition of the classic of belarusian literature, yanka kupala yakub kolas maxim bogdanovich and other digitalization of the internet, interest in the printed book has not been lost. in your opinion. as it seems to you, there is less reading, in fact , an interesting one is lost. uh, just at the paper and printed book. there are advantages and disadvantages to a printed book as well. e, she, let's say, causes great emotions. it is more interesting to work with it and it contributes to a deeper assimilation of information, but electronic

publications. it is more compact. she has the possibility of additional work with text. and our research shows that e, with age, our readers still prefer to throw paper. presented today, the national library in digital format has become more of these digital readers today. if they can call, of course, a library. today. it is not only printed documents, we provide access to more than 100 databases of domestic and global manufacturers. uh, also the library produces information resources from its own. it must be said that today readers have a choice along with working with printed documents. he e has the ability to access hundreds. uh, we are looking for the titles of modern newspaper magazines, uh scientific articles. here you can get acquainted with the full texts of textbooks. e scientific publications. uh, that's legal literature is practically uh, all kinds of

documents. we are available in both