andrey

krivosheev, chairman of the board of belarusian journalists, general director of the minsk news agency i would like to talk about the quality of modern journalism. i would like to talk about how we withstand the information blows that fall on our heads and on the heads of our audience. what can we do, what do we want to do? and what should we do? hello , on the air, the program, say, do not be silent, the studios victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina are visiting. today we have andrey krivosheev good afternoon

andrey evgenievich you are also an executive were the director of the eurasia great dane festival, which was held in smolensk in early october. this year, a record number of applications for the festival were submitted from 12 countries of the world, and you are growing , but there was an occasion. i remain. for now , as the festival continues its work, the best films that we have selected for our , uh, final program. short sheet. we have already begun to show the so-called e in the regions of belarus in the cis countries, so life is full of festivals. continues in minsk there was a big screening we invited lawyers the investigators showed the film, the winner of our german colleague, who received the grand prix, the wilhelman house of keshulz, on the events in odessa with regard to growing up. let's grow, uh, the festival, although a small modest one must understand that this is a documentary not an artistic one.

it requires such a cinema requires a more intelligent intellectual viewer who is ready to come to the cinema and is ready to watch, sometimes very difficult documentary footage and tapes, and then still ready to discuss them and express their position and point of view. actually, this is what we do accent and uh, i am glad that uh in minsk more and more people uh become active participants in our festival program this year. here in minsk e cinema halls to the cinema, belarus, the first fifth hall, e plus in the museum of the history of the great patriotic war plus e satellite, belarus e, out of 17 such screenings of open tables , four people did not have enough space for us, these are indicators on the one hand. this, of course, is a problem for the organizers and me as an executive director, which we have not provided for everyone. uh, possibility comfortable participation. eh, on the other hand. this is

an indicator that the minsk audience is the minsk audience. in fact, it has such a high level of discussion culture and is ready to discuss the most complex topical historical topics that it goes to such shows and there is not enough space. and i was also at this festival. from year to year i notice that there is a constant audience, people who love this festival know and at one fine moment, when there was no interpreter from the hall next to the french lady, kind, volunteered to help us and calmly. we communicated thanks to her, that is, the class, but the public. we also had such an overarching task that with the help of this festival, let's say, we will try to inspire and train a little new leaders of public opinion, which are being formed in our public organizations. for them, it's an experience. hey, there's a room in front of you. you absolutely do not know what kind of audience it is. and what spheres do these or those people represent,

what are their political, civil and other religious views, and we invited such guys from white russia and from the belarusian republican youth union to speak moderators of these open screenings, i can say that many coped. this means that after some time we will have new leaders of public opinion who will be ready to formulate their thoughts brightly and medina to russia. although some of your speakers. i was present at the discussion of the belarus-history project. yes, they were embarrassed. this youth with popcorn. yes, that is, i mean the ministers of the church. not a single one you know who i'm talking about, he's like and do we need to do this at all, that is, he doubted, you're right. andrei that you need to dip into this every time, yes, belarus is a story, it's like an easy one. reading so this is a light documentary, in fact comics. about belarusian history animated beautiful short comics. yes, that's why the youth came who watches these comics. yes, they

came absolutely in this. uh, movie theater culture with popcorn, there's nothing wrong with that. eh, the main thing for me was that they asked questions, eh, and eh fathers to this, which represents just the historical direction of the work of our orthodox church and uh, festival director and producer of this big project. shekhovtsov. valery nikolaevich and me, uh, that is, it was a lively discussion. moreover, they sounded like such, as it were, fair questions there, that's why there is not enough of that era or why here and there and they finished. uh, you know, such provocative ones tried to, uh, push us into the sphere of such a skirmish into the field of a skirmish, so that we argue about some events in history, it's okay. we are ready to argue at all. uh, this is the advantage of belarus in that we can freely uh talk about any period of belarusian history, and by and large

. not for one of these periods. we will not be fatally ashamed. we didn’t do ethnocide, we didn’t carry it out on foreign territories. we did not commit, uh, crimes that are classified as genocide and the extermination of a people. we did not capture foreign lands, we liberated our own, we became, uh, both victims and winners in world wars, uh, so our history is rich in beautiful and in the year of historical memory. we must carry out such work in our neighbors, there are already extremely negative moments in history in particular may 2, 2014. in odessa, it is precisely the events of this day that e tells the film the winner, which you have already mentioned remember odessa by the german director wilhelm keshul's house. let's look at a small fragment - this is a crime that has not been investigated and will not be investigated until this government is replaced. i also knew some people from the fallen negatura vladimir

, i knew, but as i knew, i made out by may 9 they brought photographs to the elements. here he brought poems and photographs. i am an artist by profession. draw a rectangle with i talked to him and solve my photographs of these elements and literally in a couple of days they saw for what yes a man of my age. i don't understand at all. note. the most terrible thing in everything is that society, as if it does not notice, does not remember. this is how it is absolutely necessary to treat it somehow due to the fact that this propaganda is being silent and no one is telling the truth, no one is talking about it at all, as if it never happened. moreover, people still say they were

glad they were. this is such anger rises. here you want i don't know how to flip something. this is what society has been brought to, what happens and people are indifferent and absolutely. not counting other people when it happened. here is a woman asking when it happened that people were not considered people andrei but there were times of fascist stones, they burned belarusian villages. uh, more than nine and a half thousand such villages. they burned some of them together with the inhabitants of belarus, yes. this is a modern khatyn, and the most outrageous. i agree with this lady the most outrageous thing is that not only that no one is investigating. it is a terrible crime of burning people, and these are the tortures of finishing off people who have suffered, uh, inside the building. uh, just some kind of ritual

ritual such a cult of murder occurred before our eyes, but uh, i saw this reaction and all the doctors who deal with these know about it, that in kiev studios live, and the participants and the public rejoiced at the burning of their compatriots. there was a standing ovation when they said. what about these supposedly pro-russian colorados? uh, everyone was burned, uh, there was joy in the house of the trade union in odessa this says about. e neo-nazismo - this is xenophobia - this is neo-nazism. this is dehumanization. and this is a conscious act of terror against a significant part of its society, its citizens. that is, this is a purposeful intimidation, and then in the fourteenth year and all subsequent years, no one especially especially because of the so-called radicals who merged with the kiev regime. uh, in general embraces, no one

hid that odessa and mariupol there in the fourteenth year were needed in order to intimidate, uh, ukrainians who speak russian , but who profess their own. in my opinion the true tradition of the history of historical memory, which does not go to bandera. and to the wars, the liberators of the soviet army but they had to be intimidated so that they were resigned, so that they would not defend their rights. uh, so that they don’t dare to raise their voices, they don’t agree with this kiev junta, and according to all the studies, then this burning odessa was not the city in which they voted for the european vector. it has always remained true. yes, like ukraine. but like many cities in the east. yes, this is a tradition of the south-east of ukraine, which, of course,

tends to a greater extent to russia to large eurasian projects. eh, that's all. justified there is a turnover of people's well-being . e, in these regions they are tied precisely to e, east in the east. by the way, odessa is much more complicated, because it is a port city with a tradition, you know, both europe and asia are mixed up there, plus their own deep inner tradition and culture. not by chance. after all, this crime took place in odessa, that is, one of the most intelligent cities in ukraine, a city with a high culture, a sphere of tolerance with tolerance had to be brought to its knees. and it succeeded, but it's not the only worst thing that it's not the only crime. all uh, major events on which the modern myth and the kiev regime are based, and uh, the so-called heavenly

hundred killed on the maidan, the crime against journalists bloggers and freelancers has not been investigated, even according to ukrainian statistics. these are my colleagues from the national union of journalists of ukraine who live, but they give information that there are more than 35 journalists. only killed. over the past 8 years in ukraine although this statistics are incomplete. i think there already we are talking about a fifty. unfortunately for our dead colleagues, because they do not consider individual journalists because of journalists, this is especially the military correspondents who die on the front line, who work from the outside. e donbass pavel sheremet blown up in the center of kiev and climb elderberry. uh, just brutally shot, everyone in kiev, including the investigators of the prosecutors, knows who did it, but under the influence of these radicals and the crowd that stormed there, uh, raged near the court release the main suspects. well that's good october 18th human rights advice.

the un recognized that the armed forces of ukraine have committed at least two crimes against russian prisoners of war, is it worth it to hope that the west will still begin to see clearly, so to speak, but we already have it. uh, there were precedents when large international organizations, such as freedom chaos. there, reporters without borders published their reports, which were unpleasant for the kiev regime, and immediately a war of discredits began public organizations, and they began to retreat to take steps back to say that yes, they are all so clear. eh, in my opinion. so far it's more of a game so far this game including the game of un officials who can't help but notice the egregious crimes against humanity they're committing with the kiev regime because it's just, well, it's obvious on the internet. with all the censorship that is being built. uh, the so-called big digital hostings and portals still leak videos of torture, and

russian wounded soldiers are killed bandaging the throat all this nightmare thrash that a normal person cannot and should not watch, uh, it falls out by the militants of the kiev regime themselves. yes, for braggadocio in order to intimidate someone out there from russian conscripts. maybe , uh, they brag about it, on this on this cult of violence, cruelty and blood. uh, the modern myth of modern ukraine has been built. unfortunately, i don't mean ukraine. e nations are not like a society, like a state of people who sing about bandera. well, yes, what are the main characters, uh, so you repeat them legacy well interesting cases of banderi. in one of the villages of the vilnitsa region, they decided to rename stepan bandera street vlaganska. it would seem that. well, a curious impulse, but it’s hard to

call the reasons for this sound in connection with russia’s aggression against ukraine, rename it. yes, in my opinion, settlements associated with the aggressor country or the history of the russian empire and the ussr, i just think that these are the inhabitants of this community. uh, they're just trying to fit in. uh, in the general context so well, they are cunning, by and large they are cunning. and yes, it's true that the vast majority of ukrainians are not fans of bandera about this. they say, even those sociological studies that there is no special faith, but they are as an indicator of what the authorities would like the customers of these social studies, even they say that bandera is not a hero for all of ukraine uh, just uh, brainwashing, total brainwashing new technologies which are currently being processed. oh, unfortunately, the ukrainians are being kicked out. here is such uh, blind without uh, futile rage depression

aggression. by the way, i personally observed this back in during the first maidan in 2004, the beginning of the fifth year, when such glazing appears in people's eyes. this is the level of outrageous manipulation propaganda. it breaks through the critical consciousness so much that it turns off this glass appears in the eyes and people cannot perceive any information, except for the information that has already been forced into them , forcibly massively squeezed in. the same thing is happening now. but you say that people's consciousness was already switched off there. and how did our audience react to your look, you showed the film of the dk mtz and there were law students, they spoke to the audience, in general, what kind of perception of this reality our public has for someone is a shock. uh, because many belarusians, although a few step back from this nightmare, because it does not fit in the head when the russians with the

ukrainians. uh, they're fighting. it just doesn't fit in a normal head. moreover, many have relatives in russia, in ukraine, and everything is intertwined with us. for someone. it's the shock someone is asserting in his positions, yes. these are indeed neo-nazis, but some cannot. someone denies to believe it to the last, so when the lights in the cinema turn on, i noticed it, then the lights in the cinema turn on and people sit and this internal protest is in them. well, no, well, it can't. here they saw. it was they who saw this refined nazism and still protest in them. well, no, it can't be, and they're trying to ask questions. here's to wilhelm e the director, that maybe you are something wrong, maybe there is a production somewhere, but you understand, uh, the mind of a normal person is not can come to terms with what is next to us. it's literally in the hundreds. uh, kilometers from belarus, nazis walk around, who zigue, who burn people, finish off women with bats,

throw them out of windows. well, it doesn’t fit in the head of belarus, uh, it’s lucky that we have this latest history, and we chose continuity from the soviet project and, of course, with the legacy. ah, the great victory, if it were not for this, we are really on the wave of this perestroika of breaking the soviet project of a general depression. could repeat the path of the baltic countries, or ukraine when and neo-nazi theories of practice, could infiltrate our consciousness as long as we have. i think, uh, this vaccine. uh, this immunity from neo-nazi, uh, practices and theories, but uh, you can’t relax, because ukraine has shown that as soon as the state collapses and as soon as the systemic objects begin to process the consciousness of huge masses of the population, it can be swayed into the bandera

neo-nazi collaborationist side. moreover, yes, ukrainian propaganda, this fake machine works in belarus and well to do this, it is enough to include youtube or some other video hosting there. or social networks to see all this paid mass advertising, when people in cinemas, by the way, talked about it, that it’s impossible to turn on a cartoon for your child, because within the framework of this cartoon there, for five minutes, they will show you three times, uh, the nazi ukrainian propaganda of these marchers howl about kiev there and that's it. you know the rest. how much money is in this loaves, yes, our colleagues, by the way, from public organizations from their journalists russia was considered somehow there was a figure of about $ 25 million a month only on individual social networks. that is, it is not taken. everything is impossible to count.

let's take a moment. let's break a reminder. we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe let's ask questions. suggest guests we are in touch. the first train loaded with belarusian peat left for china the delivery of the first batch of peat will play a big role in the development of trade cooperation will satisfy the constantly growing domestic demand in china on fertile soil and will increase the flow of export earnings to belarus, a novelty from the belarusian automobile plant. the first electric dump truck begins to conquer the market to see new models in action. we will be able to in the second half of next year. and this is not only an electric dump truck, but also a hybrid, more than 255,000 foreigners have already visited belarus without a visa, medical tourism is especially popular, and not only in regional centers. so residents of the baltic states and poland are interested in medical laboratory

research, dental services, mri and ultrasonography in belarus passed the selection of applicants for flights into space on the russian spacecraft soyuz in belarus, 20 people were selected already in october they will have to pass a test at the russian gagarin cosmonaut training center, then the main candidate for flights will be his backup, will begin training and prepare for a space expedition flight will become a landmark and will allow to raise the prestige in belarus as a space power, see the program of events on thursdays on our tv channel. each of them has his own story of acquaintance with belarus opal, i railway station and i hear that after 30 minutes the train from krasnodar minsk warsaw immediately remembered me my uncle in minsk and i don’t think about anything, i immediately order a ticket and get to the republic of belarus, it is here that they revealed their potential after the move, when they started

working, a decided, because they didn’t give a lot of opportunities, a lot of dancing and e was here the opportunity to gain experience and grow up, as artists, they were once foreigners, but now belarus is their second homeland in belarus to become successful businessmen. the first is the most. the main thing is to have animals. and when dancing on such scenes you feel that it is a great success, watch the project look at belarus on our tv channel. on

the air again, say the program, do not be silent. and today, our guest is the chairman of the belarusian union of journalists, the director general of the agency, minsk andrey krivosheev help for journalists. here is margarita simonyan. in particular, she diligently sorted out and continues to actually sort out various situations. e. here is the question . should it be journalists who do this, where are the vaunted human rights activists? unfortunately, most of the so-called human rights activists are simply agents of foreign influence, those whom our people aptly call sarasyats, who receive grants to discredit most often their own state, their own society, the traditions of their people. unfortunately. these are just fake companies that are making

money. well, listen, if, uh, it’s a funny situation, when there are such sarasy, uh, in the name of which there was a journalism support fund, there is a fund for the development of journalistic excellence there. e, advocated e. this means total censorship of russian and belarusian tv channels. that is, they have support for journalists in their title. invented a speech. there must be something like that in these passionate names, otherwise no one will give them money. i'm in the west and so are they advocated blocking censorship, closing the persecution of journalists, the development of sanctions lists, and so on and so forth, it is clear that this is a soloist. is this what journalists should be doing? in my opinion they should. and why, if a journalist has a reputation of authority, like margarita, much like vladimir rudolfovich, solovyov as our colleagues why shouldn't they do this,

people perceive them not just as leaders of public opinion and journalists. they perceive them as such a channel for broadcasting their position to power for people who make decisions and as citizens of their state, as people not indifferent, of course, journalists can, if they can, they should do this. this is the fourth power, in fact, yes, that is, this is what manifests itself. strictly speaking, this is the designation of journalism as the fourth power of journalists. as if lately, when journalists are called the fourth power, this is done with a purpose. to hang on us responsibility additionally and properties not characteristic of journalists to say, well, they are also the power of one of the branches of power, they say. here, let them pay for this, therefore , in my opinion, it will be necessary to be careful with this. i agree with andrei evgenievich, because at one fine moment it is perceived as serving me. this is already the fourth of the first three in

social networks and instant messengers , information has recently appeared, and allegedly military officers are to blame for some of the failures of the russian army. well , a number of such leaders of public opinion appeared, here, who literally began to peck their anchors, in your opinion. uh, it's their fault that they posted the video photo from the frontline question is very difficult and lies in the plane of ethics, yes and no. on the one hand, as journalists, uh, and as war correspondents, they must objectively cover the situation that is developing on this or that sector of the front, this is their mission responsibility, and also to their huge audience on the other hand. ah, as law-abiding citizens, all the more so now that martial law has been declared in these new regions of the russian federation. they need to match their content. e with those goals and objectives that set and

the civilian military administration and the security forces are just, uh, because any careless footage can reveal the location of the military personnel or the location of the medical center there, or whatever it is now. uh, a terrible tragedy in kherson when e journalists filmed an organized crossing across the dnieper and literally flew there a few hours later. ah, those famous chimeras. yes hummers. uh, high-precision artillery, people died, that is, journalists already have double responsibility for military correspondents, double responsibility. man is not only for himself and for uh, the reliability of the information that it broadcasts, but also for the fact that people can suffer because of the frames that uh, they broadcast, therefore yes and no. this is a very difficult ethical choice for every military correspondent, and just like the absolutely same difficult ethical choice that is described, by the way, in our classical literature, but should a

journalist, uh, at certain moments of the battle , brothers take up arms, now, if he sees, that civilians may suffer, but nearby lies a machine gun in danger or itself in danger can he take a weapon in his hand, because according to such, uh, the most, most classic and extremely clean. ah, ethics. no, he shouldn't, he should raise his hands to indicate that he, uh, means a military commissar journalist . well, as professor streltsov said , not a zhorafa? a stringy situation, yes, yes, but on the other hand. and, if this is the only way to save your life or life. eh, a peaceful person next to you, maybe or not. this is a difficult choice that every journalist and, in general, every person makes within himself. we can argue about it discuss. let's, as our

president said, arguing and discussing this. after peace comes to the vast expanse. but after all, it seems to me that a journalist does not even have the right to be photographed holding a weapon in his hands, of course. but this is again according to the same standard ones, but i repeat. uh, it's one thing when it's bragging, and we have such roman protasevich. yes, he drowned for the fact that he was simply engaged in posturing on the front line, they say he didn’t shoot, he didn’t kill, he didn’t participate in anything, but in my opinion there is evidence. here photograph with weapons. and this is bahwa. what is this boyishness on the one hand, and on the other hand? well, if here is a random shot, uh, pulls you out, when you made this transition from purely journalistic ethics to these human ones, you picked up a weapon of fishing rods by a correspondent in order to protect a child there, close yourself there or, uh, repel a terrorist attack or an attack by an enemy

of that , who do you consider an enemy, it was just appreciated. difficult question, believe me, no, and there can be no unambiguous answer to it. well, i certainly internal censorship. here you are must turn on the head before publishing something and think not to harm, but on the other hand. and if these pictures of yours, a video sequence, your comment from the front line, where the situation is not the best, let's say for the russian group, if they reach the decision maker and help him faster and more quickly. uh, let's say declare from here the troops of the heavy direction or throw in reinforcements and save a lot more lives. i repeat, no, there is no single recipe and war is e and the fog of war. this is such a space of constant risk and choice of journalistic ethics, and the principles of journalism telegram channel are yellow

plums. now there is premium published just such information. that at once several overseas journalists with a solid audience on twitter complained that someone was trying to buy their loyalty? yes, i promise to generously pay for what they will push through, but about the ukrainian agenda, let's call it like this, chanting ukraine won, denigrating russia, eh. here they e refused these proposals 9% agreed. that is, suspicion is not groundless that i will not be just the opinion of my colleagues. here is wilhelm's house of keshulze and adrian baque, a french journalist and investigators, and many many others who say that yes, mainstream censorship has been established in their countries. how do they softly call it, when there are mainstream dominant media that either have temniks , or have a political task. they are put before them, or the founders give them a task, and

they carry only, uh, one propagandistic point of view. and everything else is marginalized and persecuted by the same adrianke declares that in france for his honest reporting from the front line. he faces up to 30 years. imprisonment like uh from a mini chick. and well, that's what it is. e, unfortunately, the emasculation of real journalism. in those countries that used to act or tried to act as teachers of freedom of speech for us and said that if there are no two points of view in a report, this means that it is not a report. well, the famous one is a democratic field. unfortunately, but andrei , well, you have been in journalism for a long time and there were times we built our relations with our european partners in different ways, when we could be useful to each other and learned from each other. yes, well, uh, what emotions are you experiencing right now that the world has become so polar,

that is, well, really two points of view, you can’t there. well, we are also intolerant of our opponents. i am on one side. uh, a feeling of satisfaction because everything that we talked about and warned the belarusian society about, it is now on the surface. now no one is hiding anything. no plans of your own. already they are talking about the need to bring in terrorist fighters on e, v. belarus those we are the people who before that showed how they take off their shoes before standing on the bench. you see, the same people, that is, less hypocrisy. uh, more truth on the one hand. it's good on the other hand, of course i have a disappointment because. uh, it turned out that well, there are no rules left. hmm, there are no agreements of decency in relationships, including with our, uh, western colleagues and, first of all, with our western colleagues, when people know

what they commit, uh, crimes against belarusian journalists. suppose they are included in the sanctions lists and continue to do so, trying to justify it with something. and more often just freezing and not trying. nothing can justify or explain this. on the one hand, yes, this is true, yes, this is the essence of the moment, uh, but on the other hand, how can a normal person relate to this, as your colleague , shafir, said that french journalists would like to come to the festival forum somewhere in russia wanted to come already and our moldovan colleagues for separating us forcibly and collectors and people among themselves. well, that is, that is politics. and when it ends, what will it lead to in 2020. i remember, in the studio of our colleagues, from the second national tv channel, there were people who at the same time were in their closed conferences, and they were discussing the murder of

the leadership of the university, and they were sitting in the studio of the university, and broadcasting. well, well, that is, the son is fine. i know cases when congratulations were written with one hand, and in the other they dug a hole on the other side. this is an experience. they work for us you won't get past it anymore. uh hmm sorry though. yes, we were probably too naive were naive of the twentieth year. and we tried to smooth the corners. we tried, uh, to perceive ours. eh, colleagues' neighbors, as decent people as people with ideals. really. well, it's hard to understand differently when you're 20 years old, they talk about ideals. when they speak, they speak, and then once and for a moment all these ideals turn off and they turn you out of the dialogue or try to turn you off. well, while we are still not turned off, our journalists can visit sochi and media forums all of russia , for example, you were there, but among the participants.

here there were a lot of them. it is here and you , yes, help us andrey with a pen. well, what’s useful, what interesting things we managed to emphasize from this trip, in fact , this is the largest media forum of a journalist in europe, which is held by more than 1,000 participants of professional journalists and believe me, this is not held for the sake of even such beautiful photos that will remain in memory - this is e such a continuous weekly master class master class, uh, these are trainings. these are, uh, such brainstorming sessions on the most important uh problems that exist now both in federal, in our case, republican journalism and in regional journalism. in particular, we used the sochi forum to strengthen ties between regional media holdings of belarus and russia in order to exchange

the latest developments in the protection of journalists in content promotion, to find out who to cooperate with in order to promote content on major russian new platforms , we look there. with yub who is this does? what algorithms work there so that we have an opportunity, if suddenly one of us is finally pressed into the space of american or transnational hosting and portals, so that we can exist there and continue to develop there. well, that's exactly what we talked about with our russian colleagues. they are waiting. this is indicative of this, ivan mikhailovich chasemann says about what popularity, for example, the youtube channel and galaxy of the radio company has among the russian audience. for them, this is very important and necessary. and at we had a journalist from ukraine who said that ukrainian ukrainians. and

german the only thing e. we have now also raised this question at a media forum in sochi, how to finally fully engage in visiting, so that not only artie is there or partly a belt radio company there. the first channel of the belarusian radio e belta, was engaged in translating our content in the language there into polish into german into english and delivering our view on the situation there, so that large regional media holdings and the association of media holdings would do this, so that we do this in concert, including with our russian chinese eurasian colleagues, that is, that this is work. so well-groomed. how debugged. she is hostile. uh, the parties against us understand? we, too, must learn in this direction. and so we said something in russian and said the right things, but german-speaking fran as a speaker did not

reach the audience. and you, as the chairman of the belarusian union of journalists. we remember that you constantly stand up for the interests of the regional media for their development and already mentioned that at the forum, uh, they talked about hmm uniting uh in russia and belarus, and back in april they said that there is an initiative of a joint union of journalists of russia to act as founders of the regional press association, russia and belarus at what stage is it now, and agreements are being concluded? a server or a content exchange network that will function 24/7 and unite quite a lot of editions is still an expense, we are grateful that we are supported and natalya ivana kachanu of

the republic and the federation council of the russian federation are connected to this issue, but where we start we are looking for those interested in this association in belarus and russia, let's say. here is the news agency minsk, which i have the honor of woz. we u have concluded an agreement with uh, moscow colleagues. here the radio station says moscow and for a day of the birth of evening minsk, we plan to conclude such a large comprehensive agreement with evening moscow, a large media holding, which, like us, is not just a newspaper . she what gives you the right? what to exchange for exchange content, and do it on a regular basis uh-huh and what ’s more, order the content that you need here right now, for example, our colleagues in

yekaterinburg know that a big one is coming to them, a representative delegation of the city of minsk to conclude large agreements there for the supply of urban equipment for the construction of social infrastructure facilities for the agro-industrial complex there, for example, farms. on a turnkey basis or complexes, yes, on a turnkey basis, they say, listen, we would like to show how it looks before your arrival before the arrival of this delegation. how it works to prepare our audience for the arrival of distinguished guests from the city of minsk, they place an order with us. we are going to shoot, let's say on a small scale, mash, how are they produced there trolleybuses electric buses we are going to show, here is a typical project of a modern belarusian school with a swimming pool. yes, we show. here's what they bring you, well, plus a very important acquaintance of the chief editors. these are the large media holdings of the russian federation of belarus, when you have a personal

contact, when you have a trusting relationship, you will really send your material to your colleague and you will be sure and know that it will not be edited there and you will be sent your own material in response, which you you can post it. agreed editorial policy no one says that the russian colleagues will interfere in our affairs and in our editorial policy. and we in them we talk about the fact that on major topics where we should speak together, for example, here is the opposition to neo-nazism, theory in theory in practice. here we are negotiating and pursuing a coordinated editorial policy in practice. what does it mean? this means that we build a series of materials in any medium of video material video tutorials. uh, text publishing radio broadcasts joint and here we are over, let's say for two months, or even a year of historical memory, we are pursuing a coordinated

editorial policy, speaking as a united front, exposing fakes that relate to history and e, holding such bright media campaigns and actions and believe me, this has a much better impact on the audience than if we published separately a couple of articles our colleagues in yekaterinburg in moscow in the far east in sochi and in vitebsk gomel grodno issued one article each, when this is an agreed company, it has a much greater effect. well, there are good examples we already have similar projects. the same lim yes, here comes tretyakov they come to the festival, they work. uh, a successful project that was launched as a club of chief editors and experts of belarus russia friends. hey, sebras, this is a club. that's when the big media managers and journalists of belarus and russia met at the same table

and even asked each other sometimes, believe me, i was present at these meetings. and there, without cameras, without quoting each other, they asked very difficult questions. and why is it like this, belarus is represented in your media? why or there? and why did you run into russia there in your media resource on such and such a question, and this is the essence of your editorial policy, or do you defend someone's interests here with your publications, when the editors-in -chief sat in each other's eyes, you said everything. uh, so good joint projects have appeared that are still working there and russia, uh, 24 shows, uh, parade. yeah, uh, we're on independence day. and we're showing a lot more and more. uh, the content that is produced in russia, that 's it, it's honest, it's confidential honest relations to e, which are built

between editors-in-chief. essentially, indeed. whoever says what, but it is the editor-in -chief who determines the policy of the holding. quite right. we can't help but agree. and now let's take a short break. after a short pause, we will return to this studio, while subscribe to our telegram channel. tell them to be quiet. leave comments. offer us guests, and you look for all our issues on the youtube channel, belarus is one. on the air, say, don't be silent, and our guest is the general director of the agency, minsk news, as well as the chairman of the belarusian union of journalists. andrey krivosheev, we know that you don't like to brag. well, after all, almost a year ago you headed the minsk news agency, you already mentioned that you were preparing for big festivities, as the head of andrei evgenievich, that you brought something new and what you said you should definitely get rid of first , the most important thing, what we started to do. this, of course, is the notorious cross-media,

when the content we create e, scatters on all the sites in which we this and the radio air is active and streams. this and uh, newspaper publications for sure. only deeply analytical. these are social networks. this is telegram, this is youtube rutube and everything else where we broadcast and can broadcast. this is a children's swing magazine, that is, to let e news information content that we give life to live. uh, that must have been one of those key moments. uh, to which we, together with my team, had to learn to build all these flows of e -content, and new projects e, we, in fact, well, by 70 percent updated radio broadcasting. it was also a large and complex project. now we are preparing for the fact that, finally, we will have a new, but multifunctional portal,

minsk news.by. e, which will let us just e do. uh, radio broadcasting and full-fledged streams is a big and difficult job with uh, a team of journalists writing, uh, who needed to be taught. and somewhere i honestly admit and force to shoot. not just, uh, means seeing the news and describing the news. e skillfully, working with the word, but also shoot it, yes or congregate. yes? yes, yes, and i'll be honest the team was also initially not happy that, in addition to the fact that they work in the classic serious and most widely circulated newspaper there, for example, vecherny minsk city, and they are looking for, they should also work for the portal and on the radio and in social networks are familiar. well, to be honest, i went through this in a white radio company. when e remember, they

began to teach us how to edit our own stories, that is, or at least do pre-editing. it 's also and we also resisted and resisted talking. how so? we are creators here, for this there are specially trained directors, video engineers. e assistants who will collect. and here i wrote the text and it means that a big team came and the text was embodied in a television plot, but the time is different , the time is different. uh, more e what, it seems to me, we managed to do this after all, to introduce author's journalism in our media holding, when our chief editors, my deputies e, do not hesitate to go on air or give a column in the newspaper of their author's position. i already see the backlash. i see that people like dima isaichuk there, who beautifully now, in the space of youtube, it

tells the fifty-five-year history of the evening minsk and i see that a person likes it. he is not just a correspondent or columnist there, but a matter of the history of the newspaper. he is already a historian. he already passes the history of the city of minsk through himself and tells it in the space of youtube, that is, in fact, a digital tv and he likes it. and what do you think, this newspaper story, it's still not there. no, no, of course not all. if you find it, look for sure there are viral videos. we also recently discovered them in tiktok about how evening minsk is snapped up in the morning. uh, in the subway there, so we distribute such a large stack for free. yes it is our social ideological mission to distribute, uh, our newspaper for free and thank god that the founders support us in this, and the chain is going. here the subway opens. these people rush there and begin to disassemble this viral

video, it shows. uh, how much the serious newspaper evening minsk is in demand there, by the way, this is a newspaper. well, let's not hide it, probably, but then it’s the same. here it is dismantled in batches in order to sell it later. i did not know in suburban transport. by the way, about commercials and bloggers, our colleagues from the mgtrk have recently aired the world. uh, an interesting story, the first full-time blogger appeared at the minsk refrigerator production plant. let's see a small fragment always with makeup and even with ales belozorov's branded manicure. ready to stream at any moment for the sake of likes and views. why is a girl from the mogilev region studying in her third year at the technological university, she worked at the enterprise during the summer holidays, assembling refrigerators. i had to open the lid, lift the lid, then put the wires there to close up. uh, put the lid on with paste and lighten your rib with a screwdriver

. here, yes, yes, this is my operation in between work olesya recorded a video about assembling refrigerators about the life of factory workers a video about broken nails olesya shocked the audience his record broke the lunch menu in the factory canteen with more than 5 million views. olesya used to have half a million subscribers factory videos weekdays brought another 130,000 real fans. that's all no one forces without journalism without the union of courses and seminars. if you don’t want to take a closer look and offer cooperation , we will definitely offer, but uh, this is the same citizen journalism that can no longer be stopped. we used to be like this 10 years ago. so some shied away from civilian journalists, that is, e not professionals. and now this is normal. moreover, we are ready to support and develop it and already

we are doing this, by the way, instead of with the main department of ideological work on youth affairs of the minsk city executive committee with olga nikolaevna suitcase. what we are doing is helping people who have the ambition to become leaders of public opinion, that is, to come to you there on tv, in a newspaper , on the radio and broadcast. adjust their position to their own meanings, or uh, those who want to become bloggers teach them the right way from the point of view. uh, directing, in terms of framing, uh, teaching them how to use shoot videos with your gadgets shoot yourself uh become bloggers, that is, we are this mutual cooperation. they adopt elements of journalism from us. and we adopt elements of sincerity and immediacy of work from them in new videos. let andrey these examples from work bring you some kind of practical result and your, uh, holding the

area. we, too, congratulate you, join his festivities and all the better for the words that will be spoken again. i am sure, and in the address of your publication in your address personally, because thanks to your energy it is more ebullient, it all develops and it is very interesting to watch it. we are tatyana shcherbina victoria popova with you today about goodbye, goodbye. and now andrey krivosheev is speaking. dear colleagues dear minskers, i would like to congratulate you on the upcoming fiftieth anniversary of the city's main newspaper. uh, the most popular vecherniy minsk in these 5.5 decades, and the newspaper has come a long way from such a serious print publication to a full-fledged cross-media one. how fashionable is it now to say media but the main thing that remains in our newspaper is that it is made for minsk residents for the

garage, it should be convenient, comfortable and visual, and it should reflect the opinion and positions of our citizens. it should, uh, bring up the burning issues that concern you, and i'm sure and hopeful. uh, the fact that such a newspaper will be at least another 4.5 decades. uh, to serve your interests, and together with you we will celebrate it, well, a century.

would you like to spend one day in the center mother and child, our center stands at the origins of the life and health of our children, see with your own eyes, how doctors help children at the initial stage of their life. in general, we saw the operation ourselves, although in principle of moderate severity, but at a minus kilogram, at least there is, you see such a little green eye. here i am talking now. yes, and it says in green it means in terms of decibels. here is our conversation is quite acceptable. he is also a small baby ram 800. or maybe you would like to learn more about such a difficult and very important profession as a teacher. my job is to learn and educate your children. show me how to hold a pencil. and this is your second life, your family, where there are no

holidays and somewhere you have no right to make a mistake in the project one day, we will introduce you. watch you with the unique people of our country on belarus 24 tv channel.

threats and provocations in cyberspace, how to effectively deal with challenges are discussed in the palace of independence