in the owner's barn, they found a warehouse where more than 12 tons of barley, corn , mixed fodder and meal were stored without appropriate documents in another household in rechitsa belonging to this villager, they found another warehouse where almost 34 tons of various grains and mixed fodder were stored, investigators initiated criminal proceedings against two men cases on the facts of misappropriation or embezzlement committed by a group of persons on an especially large scale, the driver was arrested. big tour in the ninetieth season after 30 years on the historical stage of the bolshoi theater of russia opera and ballet artists from belarus will perform in moscow, headed by the artistic director of the theater, people's artist of the ussr valentin elizariev brought two performances on october 25-26, we will give the national opera of the sultan the wild hunt of king stakh 32 years ago to the historical detective, korotkevich. already applauded. moscow public is the time to repeat over the years. the

generation of artists has changed and the audience today in moscow will see the production of the chief director. anna motornaya from october 28-29, we will show the legendary nutcracker to the music of tchaikovsky in the new author's edition of 2020. valentina elizarev tickets for all performances are sold out. more information from my colleagues 15 hours, i say goodbye to you. all the best. hello greetings to everyone who is now

with us welcomes the guests of today's edition of the event a lot. so let's not waste time, let's get started. that's why on the eve of an interesting meeting between alexander lukashenko and alexander dugin, a famous russian philosopher, let's remember one of the fragments once, i remember too rudely, i will say giggling in russia some, as we are, i call them liberals when i said that the time will come. it was said up to a year or two ago, something in the nineteenth-twentieth year, when putin and i would have to stand back to back to shoot all the work. how it is? that what we see today and we are going today, therefore, we need to stay close to each other. you don't have to try. eh, somehow get around each other. no need. there is something to share here, like our common victory in the great patriotic war. everything is clear, roles. uh, distributed the story a long time ago and a person like you, analyzing events in the form of reality e, will do.

i think the right conclusions. and not only this is my interest, yes, the interests of belarus and russia are the interests of the russian belarusian people of all russians and belarusians, in general, this president does not have simple meetings, especially for those that take place in public. but andrey evgenievich what do you think about what happened and what was it about first of all? this meeting immediately came to my mind. uh, the wonderful roman bulgakov master and margarita, when you remember , played chess at woland's and there was such a phrase. it seemed that the best chess magazines in the world would give everything to print the course of this game like this. i am sure that the best political science philosophical ideological journals in the world would give a lot, if not everything, in order to publish, what were these 2 hours of conversation about, because alexander gelich, dugin it's not easy, there is a political scientist, a political strategist, even

a political analyst this is a philosopher who conceptually scientifically substantiated another conservative, yes right, but different way of civilization development. he didn't just take the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long review interviews with him, he explained the school of political realism in the usa, the engineer's brush explained who these people were? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will politics develop further here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. there, it was not by chance that during this interview it was said that yes, we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has, uh, a clear concept of ideology the future, but the slogan that can pick up people to lead it is not there yet, belarus is interesting, it’s important, because in fact, for the last quarter of a century we have been choosing a different social, sometimes we say

the socialist path of development, and we need scientific justification. we need a foundation that we will lay under our state building, while it is largely groping due to the position of the president, by the way, this is an important point. look, we and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko said that the necessary dialogue does not exist in that a form in which it would be enough to respond to the western dialogue formed and implemented every day. but what 's the difference? look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we see in the west, these new, let's say, globalist values ​​that break family values, which, well , even break common sense. and we see what tension is being created within society, and here, on the contrary, they are moving towards the fact that it is necessary to take the idea from the people themselves already further than it develop aleksey and as you see, you know, when we, uh, are now colliding in general in uh, in

matters of confrontation. oh well, some say the collective west is the collective east first. we uh should be talking about the opposition of just ideas. yes, and even uh, the theory of propaganda, uh, which is a book on propaganda that arose after the first world war. it clearly stated that the key war is not important in the war on the battlefield, the war in the information space. it's always war. ideas against ideas. and of course, now when a we a see an aggravation. uh, this fight is already uh, all the latent confrontations have turned into open ones, and the confrontation between us and the collective west, we need a single idea that united not just belarusians within ourselves. yes, it united a large space. this is space. uh, it should end not

only with russia, it should end, and then it should unite the entire eurasian space, plus e pull up e asia because otherwise the collective west with their e power with their financial economic opportunities, of course, can impose its surface. what idea with what now? if they don't fight, then they oppose each other. the fact of the matter is that if philosophers sit and try to work out the idea of ​​an idea, it is groped for by one confrontation. it remains to express it. yes, to return. to the collective west, the idea is simple. this is the idea of ​​uh, profit and uh, net profit and the withdrawal of net profit in all possible ways. what is our idea? here is the most. the main thing, now let's listen to the old original admirer of both belarus and your course. i think i never doubted it, and even in

the most difficult times there were difficult times between our states. with all my heart, with all my heart, with all my capabilities , i supported you and supported the line that you brought out and did not allow your state to be plundered. you did not make the mistakes that we made in the nineties and are now correcting with such difficulty. and i just sincerely bow before your authority, before your courage, before your a-convinced stamina, salvation belarusian people of belarusian statehood. and that means ourselves means ours. unity means our union state, and today we are just like you said, shoulder to back in the back more than us , not everyone else ended up somewhere either in neutral positions or in opposite positions, and here we stand and defend our slavic russian belarusian idea together - it's like observing for yourself. this is the opposition of the

idea of ​​meanings, about which they spoke. yesterday, i fully agree with the previous ones with my colleagues and the upcoming ones. but i would like give when you say that we are trying to grope for ideas, but remember that the soviet union was in the sixties. uh, colonialism collapsed and a lot from african countries. when they came to us and why they supported us, yes, and now they began to support us, let's say , because they saw that this world is more just, therefore, of course, the word is justice. it is so somewhat abstract, so i agree with alexei. what else works out is necessary for us to invest in the concept of justice, but, in principle when we speak for justice. and so even our confectionery factory expressed, no matter how it was. e, so to speak, a marketing ploy, but nevertheless for justice and therefore, uh, when, uh, mr. dugin says that uh, so we express the idea and we are together uh, together, that is,

for the country e, not only the two of us , because look, african countries also support us. let's remember when the leader spoke, mm, united there, what is it called? in general, unites all african countries, and he said that we will never support, the united states sent me this speech. and that means he supports everything that happens. here, uh, so to speak, what russia is doing and, uh, belarus, so you can’t say that we are just the two of us, of course, it all depends on how it goes, how the operation in ukraine goes, so many fear that if there is a loss, then there will be a loss and that's why they seem to have calmed down, but in fact, there are not two of us. there are more of us. i think that this is a meeting, in general it is significant, it reflects tectonic shifts in the russian elite. actually not yet for a long time. well, dugin was considered marginal liberals. that is, he was moved, uh, far to the

periphery of it, so to speak, about government radio and television experts and so on. in general, uh, by and large. they giggled at him, gloated that he was a man from the past, that his ideas remained in the last century and died, and now it turned out what is actually happening now. well, let's say, so you can say by carrying out the command of russian society. well, one thing can be said that the liberal part of the russian elite is losing its position. she, uh, had to show your true face. and someone, indeed, as dugin said, turned out to be on the other side of the front, someone turned out to be neutral. and so, in general, the patriotic part is gaining strength and now it is choosing the russian higher power. in fact, she has no choice. it must rely on patriotic forces. i would add a counter interest here. the president said about her interest in meeting with rice gilch, and i would

fantasize about the interest of dugin himself to meet with the belarusian leader and for the belarusian president. it indeed, the outreach of our ideas of the belarusian position to the broad traditionalist russian society and conveying the meaning, and not only russian, because dugin has been translated, if i’m not mistaken, into 50 languages ​​​​of the world and his conservative view of the world is conservative in the right sense, that is, conservative development, and not stagnation, and it is in demand all over the world. and here is alexander gelievich in several interviews that i recorded with him. he talked about it, belarus is important. by the fact that she is trying to apply a great theory, a beautiful harmonious theory and to work out in practice, that is, belarus is trying to build a society of social justice, a society of development of its sovereignty in absolutely hostile conditions, just trying in practice, which is very

important to work out great philosophical ideas and concepts. moreover, it is also important to understand what opposes us. here barrel let it slip. but this is really a theory of racism, a theory of superiority, when it is declared from a high rostrum that the european union is a liberal world as a whole, it is a flowering garden. everything else is jungle thought you and i are perceived as monkeys from the jungle. this is repetition. uh, this absolutely russian nazi. uh, ideologies, white man supremacy, that 's uh, white's burden. yes, this is concentrated racism that lives in this liberal elite. and by the way, alexander is fighting against this racism, just in time for the thesis that irina vasilievna said that it is very important to understand that we are not alone today. yes, in close combat. we are back to back, but there are a number of states that are carefully watching and worrying about our

victory and i would like to turn, of course, to the castane, which was rich these days and to meet the accents that sounded. we will inevitably turn to them for a long time to come to the capital of kazakhstan. i remember hosting the sixth summit meeting on interaction of measures of trust in asia. alexander lukashenko became one of the key figures of this forum. bilateral meetings with the presidents of kazakhstan and turkey, the prime minister of pakistan and, of course, communication on the sidelines are often no less important than the negotiations themselves. with the aggravation of the situation perimeter. i would not want this escalation to happen, let's stop the war and come to an agreement. here is irina vasilievna, if you look even earlier, not so long ago it was samarkand shanghai sliding cooperation now is this meeting. and uh, the formation of the same brix, we heard that, with reference to the president of south africa, saudi arabia, expresses a desire to join. it's already completely

different. what is a palette. but if we return to this asian format. can we say that dynamically new the world order centered in asia is unconditional, and in addition, do not forget that when we say that and not only we say, and everyone says that globalization is dead . and i want to say that she ordered to live in the format for a long time, as she was understood by the united states, which means today . it will go in a completely different format. the mothers of the generalization of large regional macro-regions and what is happening here is e scos. eh, so i was going to. uh, so what's going on happened here is this meeting here it shows that configuration will be completely different. she will change. and what is typical, what will develop, and well as it shows. eh, statistics for us is developing at a very fast pace in asia a and, accordingly, asia has the greatest

prospects. not even from a point of view. we will talk there, ideology. what ideology and so on. if you look at the economy, asia shows, well, an example, er, in development, it's not only china although china has a little bit. here the pace is slowing down, it is mainly india and all the nearby countries they have the potential exists, even if the current pace may not be high enough. they have a very large potential, which is why we participate. here in these meetings in meetings we are, in general, a european state. we are in europe by the way, this is the last meeting. eh, it’s written in their charter that only an asian state can become a member, then i think, but how will we get there, but we are part of a union state, and through a union state we fit very beautifully, fit in, and many they laugh that they say this is asians they say we are europeans and er, so to speak, where we are going. we are going in the absolutely right direction, but

because, apart from markets, and apart from that, what we will have and we now have. we are now cooperating with china sufficiently, but widely and deeply. this is our strategic partner, that we will get more new partners, that our markets will expand , we just need dashi yes, yes, i want to say that here we are, in general, simple people watch our programs. it's not just markets, it's jobs. so they will be kept jobs will be a prospect. and our industry and our agriculture. yes, uh, it means that the united states imposes sanctions on uh, china is connected with semiconductors in the transfer of certain technologies, but we must not forget that belarus was the republic in which electronics developed during the soviet union, uh, we have uh, at that time there were good schools. it is necessary to renew it is necessary to raise precisely this is the direction. you

look at how many universities we produce specialists, e.g., related to electronics with programming, that is, this promising direction. we need to engage and maybe engage together. e with china uh-huh and alexey but china after the congress will begin to change the configuration. e in asia, considering in general its scale in general, maybe even the world configuration, or they are here a policy of cautious thoughtful development. they will continue here. you know, if you read all the information that is now coming out, uh, in china, they are actually now solving their internal problems very strongly, first of all, related to, uh, the acceptance system solutions. and yes, we know that they have announced a campaign of the so-called tigers and flies to fight corruption at various levels. tigers are the highest composition. uh, flies are petty bribe-

takers. yes, that is, in reality, we see that china is in preparation for a strong confrontation with the collective west, not even the united states of america with western corporations. he understands that at the beginning it is necessary to reorganize within himself for the struggle, so that there is no fifth, sixth and other columns. and this is what they are doing now, uh, quite a bit of time. they understand that at the end of 22, the beginning of 23, most likely, the confrontation, uh, the global one will go over to their side, everyone will forget about ukraine, they will forget about russia, most likely there will be not only taiwan, but an orientation towards forming some sort of, uh, internal conflict to provoke protests within china is already being discussed. yes, the youth is catching up, so and in reality , uh west and uh, american british

corporations don't want to let go. uh, china in the free float before they like us already discussed considered. china is like some kind of jungle where a enterprises should operate. there should be. uh, terrible ecology, children must die of cancer and all. uh, the rest of them should be in the green economy, but now we see that over the past 10-15 years, china has been doing everything. in order to become an independent economic player, first of all, in a financial one, and the west is trying to prevent this regional, well, understandable for the collective west - this is such a collective one. you're generally a notion, but let's say regional opponents - this is who they have japan south korea yes, uh, without uh support from the united states, these regional leaders do not know anything, let this be the united states and china, this is the main confrontation, that is, it is clear that the united states

will not openly fight. they will most likely pull up. ah, japan will be pulled up by south korea australia, uh, philippines perhaps yes, but to confrontation, but uh , the subtlety of uh, chinese, probably, wisdom lies in the fact that china is proactive. they try to negotiate with everyone in advance. yes, do not go to the confrontation, but to negotiate. and it is. yeah uh not exactly uh, calling with the west trying to force a conflict. in general, we are talking about these new centers of power. they are not just necessary. they are already inevitable, because andrey evgenievich mentioned. now the barrel is really, when the head of european diplomacy says that the eu is a wonderful garden all around. this is john or and the barrel around in this jungle is seen necessarily by enemies, then you already know this is not a diplomat. it 's rambo first blood, they say it with a smile, look at him the day before

he tried to justify himself and said that he did not mean to offend anyone at all. ukraine is also the jungle he said, yes, and the west does not always happen either, but as they say. the first impression cannot be made twice. well, here's what is getting worse, vladimir makeev, by the way, in astana. i want to remember, this is an episode. he told an interesting correspondence that did not happen with one of his colleagues, as he said vladimir makei from one very distant country the size of belarus i quote means that he wrote to our minister this colleague. as for the sanctions against belarus, russia, vladimir, it turns out that the third secretary of the us embassy is under the most severe pressure on us, writing us instructions, forcing us to join one or another sanctions, forcing russia and other countries that support them to take specific actions against belarus , which in the event if you do not do this , then your accounts in the united states will be frozen by your relatives. children will not be able to study in the united states of america we even sent all your students to the usa ourselves

i'm afraid that this is a gop-stop already with a barrel. it's just scary not to drive. so far. maybe it's latin america let's look around the neighborhood. after all, we have recently observed the events in kazakhstan. after all, i think that their essence is that kazakhstan was shown their dependence on the west, because the main capital of the capitalists. let's just say that kazakhstan 's capital placed abroad is all exported there, not invested in the national economy, but exported there. in addition, the children of the upper elite of the upper strata, kazakhstan, study in the same way, therefore, kazakhstan is very sensitive to pressure from the west, the same is true of kyrgyzstan and all other countries of central asia, and even if we take the caucasus, then this is georgia armenia, that is, we see that you don’t even need to travel far, and therefore and when

we are surprised that our allies in the csto are not pursuing an allied policy. they are held joint exercises by the united states, in which the highest general is present and work out unknown. what courses of action does this show, how great is the danger in general, how great is the danger of this hidden threat for the time being, so to speak, and one can understand this plan, that while russia is busy in ukraine for the time being. she defends our western outpost with belarus, then hot spots in central asia are being prepared in the caucasus, and so on. that is, there are a lot of pitfalls here, and the policy should be very subtle , pragmatic, and at the same time, like the chinese, it should be politically aimed at being ahead of the european union and american diplomats very carefully. here is a colleague. e vladimir makei. uh, secretary of state blinkin. uh, declared that the world can only be

an american pak with americano, that is, in the world there can only be american domination and power. and everything else chinese is bad for everyone. so, without power it is even worse. what does this mean, that barrel perceives central europe, asia, latin africa? america is like the jungle and the united states is perceived as the jungle the european union, it's just that there are monkeys of the first class. they are a little closer and their diet is a little more. that's it, all the difference, so uh china uh. i am by the way, i advise everyone to have a good english translation of president xi jinping's speech. very carefully. watch this performance. this is the highest aerobatics. eh, precisely internal concentration, when e everything is carried out, not just a performance. this is a systematic work on the bugs. china sees its vulnerabilities.

that said about semiconductors. but china has already invested, approximately 40 billion dollars in equivalent, in the development of its chip production in order not to depend on china much. there 8 years ago launched this project. e along the issyk path, so as not to be left alone, so as not to remain in the ring. unfriendly states are building infrastructure that stretches to belarus and serbia, uh, this is the acme of international politics. i think e and participation in belarus in all meetings that link the eurasian space are aimed precisely at this. we have a deep vision of our development, and we do not rush about, as alexander gleevich dugin, by the way, also often talks about this. here is such a dashing liberalism, they say. we'll buy everything before cruel golden running center. there , right down to the board, he has a mannered e yes, and we

have a slender, logical policy built in the national interests. let's really continue, then. we started with her quite right with the idea of ​​meanings. here is diplomacy about how a new device is being formed, this is a device, while it is a mess, because it still looks like chaos, and in general. this is how it will end, here in our space. uh, this is a big operation, which is not limited, by the way, only to will depend on how this new world order will be, but as far as our security is concerned. here is a more substantive question. this is the regional grouping of the union state. here we see that we are already actively deploying a unit here, including the aviation component as a military expert in islam, i'm afraid. again. here is how you see this step. well, as i said, this is a safety option. the thing is that one mechanized division. in general , it cannot change the strategic situation, but

it can reinforce the armed forces of belarus, which is now stretched all over. so to speak, to the western perimeter of the western northwestern e, we are like a balcony that hangs over the strange nato and ukraine, and if we take the number of our armed forces of real bayonets 45.000. if we take the length of the perimeter of this border, it is two, almost two and a half thousand. we have three operational lines of command. this is northwestern western and now southwestern. and if we take our 45.000 and stretch and smudge. it will turn out that it is impossible to securely close it along this border, so now, of course, the main efforts are being made. uh, this is to the border and there the troops are covering behind the back of the border guards and so on. but , uh, the president warned that the greatest

danger from poland is hidden, maybe pushed back in time, but there is the greatest movement of troops of the group and so on, therefore, in order to fend off a possible breakthrough. uh danger from an unexpected direction. we need here these are russia's absolutely fair step. how do you feel about the howl that rises from the south, the west, nato, that's even stoltenberg. says the president of belarus lukashenko should stop involving the republic in the conflict in ukraine, a country, or rather a representative organization, which has occupied, and all western measures. that says that we should do it differently. well, here, after all, the whole point is that these guys know very little about the contractual basis of our relations with the russian federation and e. uh, the regional grouping is from direct connection knows everything does not work. they are well informed. this is a consequence of the union

treaty and our documents in the field of military-military technical cooperation, which were adopted on the basis of the union treaty. and if we look at history, then this grouping of teachings has been unfolding since 2009, and every 4 years this grouping is unfolding on our territory and is being worked out by its advancement into our territory. here, combat coordination is carried out by mixed crews of the belarusian russian part of the unit and there. at in general, everything ends with firing exercises and the return of these parts home this time. part i believe will be for a very long time in your interests, naturally something in our interests. after all, the preamble, what it unfolds. in the event of a threat of aggression in the event of a threat of aggression, that is, if the two presidents decide to deploy this grouping, then they recognize that the threat of aggression exists, that is, the purely defensive option does not depend on the events of

zelensky’s proposal to call the belarusian ukrainian border, some international observers . what is this, is this a threat? this is a provocation, this is how it is? well, i think it's an attempt. it means to obscure the situation that is developing on the border, after all. uh, ukraine has concentrated a very solid group of troops there. more than 20,000, some 30,000, if we take the territorial troops of the border force, they built a powerful line of fortifications. they blew up the bridges, which they consider the most dangerous, they mined the roads, and in this situation, when they prepared for war and do a lot of things. well let's just say reconnaissance provocative actions against belarus to talk about the need for some supposedly peacekeepers and observation. this is a mockery of common sense. there is one more point here, and the obvious strategic goal is yes. uh, sobering hot minds. uh, preventively.

so prepare for the unexpected. uh, a possible strike on the territory of belarus, but i think that there are many more such , uh, implicit, but very important, their goals that the russian federation is pursuing first. well , offhand. what is the military talking about? analysts, this is the fog of war, that is, uh, actually u understand how many 9.000 russian military personnel are there? nine entered the territory of belarus quite difficult and ukraine will be forced to concentrate part of the reserves, including in the chernihiv region, that is, without transferring them now to the most explosive kherson direction, the second is also not quite, the obvious goal is the combat coordination of russian and belarusian units. the third is the mastery of those modern weapons that are now at the disposal of the russian federation and belarusian modern weapons include drones, which have been talked about for probably three years now at exhibitions of modern weapons, including in the russian federation. well, they felt a shortage, but

belarus, it turns out, also has unmanned attack helicopters western direction. look, the president of poland did not have time for duda to declare that at first he lamented that they did not have their own nuclear weapons, then he said there was a way out. and we will ask the americans to place their arsenal on our territory and literally a couple of days pass newspaper speech, commonwealth publishes the results of the sociological. the study according to which they say the majority of poles there 54% support this idea, there 29.5 against many abstained. do the poles really want to know this? it all depends on what questions you ask. if uh. if, yes, how to ask, if they asked you if you want more and russia launched a nuclear strike, then i think that of course everyone would answer no, because the deployment of any nuclear weapon on the territory of poland automatically makes uh, these zones plus e, headquarters plus major cities, and

targets for e guidance of nuclear weapons. naturally, russia yes or that, but nuclear weapons, which in the event of further confrontation can be deployed on the territory of belarus yes, and we have already discussed this more than once that our aircraft are equipped with e, in principle, for modernized to carry nuclear weapons, so now for poland uh, the idea of ​​stationing american nuclear weapons. this is such a very good business idea. imagine what huge resources. now they will be thrown in and into infrastructure. yes. uh, some kind of nuclear weapon. it will be in the mines or it will be mobile, but in any case it requires, uh, colossal investments and poland's gdp for the next few, there will be just uh, catastrophic growth there for 5-7-10 years. they will speak. see what is the word of the polish economic miracle. yes. naturally, why is this being done in order to simultaneously weaken germany on the territory that

hosts this nuclear weapon ? poland yes, that's why this e is more of a financial economic. and the question is, uh, they are trying to hide it under the guise. russian threat, but in reality, uh, the same polish elites are trying to cash in on this. nato is now conducting these large-scale exercises of theirs. yes, in the north of uh europe, where it’s absolutely right there up to 60 . the base of the royal e, the air force is extremely brougel. yes, in the province of limburg. this is exactly the place where, but the us nuclear warhead is officially this is refuted information, but

nevertheless, the further. it turns out that it’s not just that they fly there and the words are incompatible with nato’s nuclear deterrence and defense. it's always about the attack. well , i must say that in general, in the nato doctrine, we prescribe that in the event of a conflict. so before the soviet union, these carrier planes were carried by persia. this means that nato countries can be used to strike american nuclear bombs on the territory of the russian federation and its allies, that is, they say in peacetime. so they are just they train or imitate or throw blanks, but in the case of e, then the outbreak of a military conflict is legal. they can use these nuclear bombs, which are located in six places in europe, in order to inflict a nuclear strike on the territory, which means russia and belarus. well, there are no missiles, there are nuclear bombs. uh, they are simply proposed to be

moved from germany, which rustles there and arises, protests are more than that with pleasure, allegedly, allegedly. wants to accept them, indeed the financial costs must be very large, because nuclear ammunition should be stored in certain storage arsenals where temperature is maintained, humidity and security option is a colossal investment these structures should be resistant to damaging factors up to nuclear explosion factors in case , if someone hits, so, of course, uh, if hmm poland places it's a weapon. this is a very serious shift in the entire geostrategic situation in our region. we continue lately. the west has again become more active in the belarusian direction , great efforts are being made to in order to expand the sanctions on belarus, under which russia is the most active

lithuania estonia, but all this called for belarus to be regarded as a full-fledged ally of russia in the hostilities in ukraine, and the minister of foreign affairs of estonia urma s reinsalu said that his country will steadily support democratic efforts society and even expressed the latter about the fact that his country is adjacent to belarus they say. very scary, but apparently the minister does not really understand with whom and what they neighbors, and with whom not especially for him. we show the map, belarus and estonia do not coexist, relax and, as they say, study geography irina vasilyevna what happens is one jungle everywhere they see the second he is completely afraid of the neighborhood with belarus, forgetting badly taught at school. what kind of politicians are these, this sixth american fleet enters the minsk sea. the minsk sea, yes, terrible forces with such and you are absolutely right. and they say the same thing, and analysts say so. and moscow analysts. they say that the youth has come. and i i even spoke to students. i'm telling you,

you are advocating that barrel never grow up. didn't grow up. you're so holding up, huh? yes , the youth came, who were not the first to see the war, who were not frightened. uh, i was listening to some lady's story yesterday. eh, she was talking about the possibility of a preventive nuclear strike, and a small striker went off. yes, here, then we will answer. well then, we will already enter, that is, some very strange people of history, they don’t know geography, they don’t know political science, they don’t know , and therefore, for today, these here the western elites are striving for war, this is true. you say it's scary, with whom we are dealing, and here is the level of cynicism, it is emphasized. well, this one is fine already. come on, finally, the anti-hero of our time is a barrel, so that we would do without him as we quoted, if it weren’t, we would have to come up with such a western diplomat, but he ’s giving out secrets. it must be urgently changed, because it constantly gives out. here's

what they think, here are closed clubs, and he gives it all away, but in this case, it's open information. he just voiced it, which means, and another 500 million euros will be allocated for the armament of ukraine, uh, i remembered that 500 million euros were allocated before, but a fundamental point. from where they allocate for service to the war to the last ukrainian from the european peace fund. this is the whole cynicism aleksey that's what kind of people people or this with whom we are dealing, we have discussed more than once in the framework of this program and on other journalistic platforms that, in principle, then, those who are now in power in the european union it doesn't matter if it's a fucking balti and poland or a in brussels a. they, basically, all were trained in american schools and in those institutions that finance. that is, either by soros or other a-a funds subordinate to the state department, therefore, in reality, these are hired managers fully engaged in

washington and london, but they act completely to the detriment of their people, and their european, and countries and uh, now uh, inside these european countries formed a very e, internal discontent. we see there is discontent among the population, but there is also discontent among the local national capital, which understands what e further is. ah, the politics of action. here are such characters, they will inevitably lead either to war or to total impoverishment, impoverishment and bankruptcy. e bank companies. we are already observing, and we are already observing the protests. that is, of course, while europe has, uh, two approaches, either uh, complete self -destruction, or still, uh, some element of the renaissance, but you need to understand that america and we american

political technologists monitor the entire political social very well, and the environment in europe and any encroachments of any e, some alternative leaders. they immediately destroy media, destroy, and destroy. eh, physical. yes, if suddenly someone changes the line, so we must admit that the united states and london are now such a new roman empire. e, which is, is not acceptable at all, so that in the e, subordinated to its territories, someone could, e, rebel against the metropolis. here we are talking about the fact that the west obviously and does not hide is already ready to fight to the last ukrainian. we can in this case, conflicts from the side move to any point. that and we will substitute there. why, the vassals must die for that for those who direct them to this, and the battle, and with the slogans that those who go to death welcomes you, they must necessarily express their readiness to protect other people's goals to die. uh, i

want to recall a fragment of the interview, which turned out to be very resonant for alexander lukashenko and the american channel nbc. here is one that touches on this topic. let's hear the world is busy now uh, the problems are looking for the answer to the question. listen to who is to blame, then we will figure out who is to blame every day people die let's stop the war and agree, and then we'll figure out who is right? who is to blame and we started the negotiation process, but it stopped. zelensky was forbidden to negotiate. who can guess from three times he is not independent, and today it’s right to throw fakes somewhere, it’s wrong to blame each other, the wrong way thousands of people die every day, including civilians who are not visible in anything. it's true, so let's stop this conflict the voice of common sense just yes, yes

actually the interview. i think many sensible politicians and businessmen who still remain. in the united states in western europe, e must be heeded, because this voice is not this is not. this is not just the position of belarus. it is the voice of common sense, which is equally comfortable and convenient. if you follow it, it is a problem for any normal sovereign country. i agree that there is practically no sovereign policy left in the world, there is practically no left that they can afford, or very rich and huge countries such as the usa there russia china in part, india in part brazil, or countries that have e, backbone and core. here are belarus with such such such such a country is still cubes. such a country is venezuela such a country is iran, uh, israel, that is, people who have e, well, you can’t probably say that, well,

eggs are just a rod. what about? uh, this conglomerate of seros, again, i agree, and there was a good idea that for a period of peace and such a calm benevolence of the well-fed, good performers are needed, but as soon as the world comes to movement, as soon as the boundaries, the interests of capital begin to change. uh, these good performers become just good gravediggers of the old system, because nothing but uh blind stupid execution, the orders that they give. uh, washington and either brussels or london, they can't do anything else . and they they are not imprisoned for this, this is scary. well, here is the situation. she is multifaceted. it is often very convenient, of course, to see only the enemy, who is at some distance from you. here we remember we already touched on the topic there, here is the fifth column. everything, of course, the sixth

column. these are people who happen into their chests and say there we are for putin, we took lukashenka there, depending on the context, and it seems like they e, they say absolutely the right things, but in fact they do what destroys the state and interferes with implementation. there the right idea of ​​developing the economy is mobilizing all the necessary resources of the internal forces for the task. and there is, of course, a direct confrontation - these are the cells that are being unpacked now. west, we see how people are being detained in russia now, who are trying to, well, carry out, uh, terrorist attacks. colleagues have been going on with us recently. ah, the squirrels of the radio company showed materials about how they were once again detained, and the young ones were just guys who were almost 500 dollars. they were ready to do everything to start up. yes, that's what we can do here, how to counter this, that, well, the belarusian system gives answers. we are basically good.

uh, dealt with this previous uh years. eh yes. now it's just a matter of personal choice , personal decency of these people, but the position presidential belarus, as far as i understand it, has always been such that our, uh, managers, firstly, must be grounded in belarus . that is, their, uh, money. their home, their children should not be abroad, and secondly, their internal personal ambition in politics in the economy. there, in business, management should coincide with the general trend of the development of the belarusian state, a gathering idea, which, of course, centered everyone worked well in the russian federation, was different. i would not want to criticize our closest adviser now, but it was different, and yes, their situation is more complicated, if only due to the fact that in different periods there were different ideological attitudes, that is, the ideological attitude that we are going

backwards with us, which means that there we want to become the sixth economy in the world and more goals for us. no, we want a european education system and the soviet one was bad. the russian sovereign is even worse, but there were periods. e, in particular. here. uh, the second chechen war, when yes, the internal concentration reached the other pole and they said that everything is everyone who he is not with us against us is another very important short message that sounded, but in astana did you understand the conclusions? this is why the events that we are now observing and discussing, please, what we have been talking about for so long over the years has become a reality against all of us is connected with a real hybrid war. and ukraine here is just a pretext, a pretext, the plans of individual countries for revenge for the lost

companies of the last century were hatched for a long time, starting, as is known, from the first days after the victory in the great patriotic war, and maybe even earlier. today russia and belarus are at the forefront of economic and financial attacks, but i think everyone here understands that the true goals of western strategists are much wider to divide the eurasian space into sectors of influence and use our countries. as raw materials and industrial appendages. you need to be prepared for the most diverse provocations along the entire perimeter of the cis, a recent event in kazakhstan in uzbekistan convincing and very instructive examples, but this is only the beginning of strength will test everyone for strength irina vasilievna will test everyone how

we can pass this test of strength. i want to say a little bit step aside. that's when we're talking, and you've been talking about this estonian president before. yes, he said there about civil society and they hope to blow up belarus, first of all from the inside, because they understand that we were talking about when the poles are standing there, they are doing this, and the army has become more active and so on, but they still trying to blow up from the inside. uh, that is, as it were, we will prepare civil society and we, and they say that we will prepare a civil society that flies from within. so i sometimes discussed with these guys, and they themselves come to a standstill. uh, when i say, well, okay. ah, so they won. why do they why? you, if 8 billion people live in this, what the president was talking about, that they want to dismember it, moreover, if the people think that they will remain in this territory in a

comfortable territory. uh, no matter how they evicted they didn’t force everyone to mine siberia and uranium with their hands, that is, i mean, these people really come to a dead end, i say if you are a programmer, you won’t need so many programs that you write, because the population is 8 billion. if they talk about that you need to destroy half, or even more. why do you have to stay and they , too, are in a stupor - they come, therefore, when they say that we need to endure us, probably we still need to change e work with youth. uh, so, well, what we said already when covering the first question on ideology propaganda should be more aggressive. we have some kind of propaganda, looser , softer propaganda here. ah, alex was right. what is there if a point of view appears different from, uh, the mainstream, so to speak, but they must be put out, uh, and so on, what appears, and here we need

not just to arrest there, and so on, but to tell what will happen to you . if it suddenly happens, then what are you striving for. well, i would argue here about propaganda and about its aggressiveness. eh, you know, after all, probably, it seems to me the best example was the e soviet system, when they brought up a critically thinking intelligent intelligent person. such a critically thinking person will never become a little baby and will not sip from this trough of grants. he will never betray his country, because he is aware of himself in the state and in society, therefore, it seems to me, it is precisely this critical perception of reality that needs to be developed. and believe me. the youth team something went wrong, because the union was destroyed, including by the hands of the communists themselves and many of them. well, significant some of them went, just the same, to the funds of soros and became soros, because but this

is hmm ideological again, returning to alexander gevich. this ideological competition of the soviet side was emasculated by dogmatism. well, i’m not such an old person to remember it to the end, but even i caught a time when people came to me as a young pioneer in bryansk and spoke outright nonsense, they didn’t answer my questions, children’s in many ways naive, don’t follow the dogmas went by the ears. and i saw that people who they tell me about communism or progressive socialism or perestroika. they don't believe in it themselves. they already had this one in their eyes. uh, wolf shine from close gain. this is not to be allowed. how can we, as the president said, will test everyone for strength, and we will not lose this strength, but lose it, which, paradoxically in this situation , is necessary for us. a

positive program is necessary to propagate the image of the future, the image of the future belarus. what was the tragedy of the soviet union were unrealistic goals, because well, communism is an unrealistic goal, the way it was described, that, as they say, everyone should work according to their needs, as they please, that is, people in the taken state. yes, and if we take a global scale. well, that's why i think we need more than just ideology. uh, well, the image of the future is the real image of the future to show our guidelines. where are we going? what should belarus grow into, where should it develop. here are the chinese. here they draw their image of the future. they show where they are developing - their prospects are developing. i am i think that we also need to draw this real plan for the development of our state and , as they say, along with the suppression of the enemy. we must still strive for the ideal

that we will build. alexei and as you can see, you know, i will say from the point of view, probably metal science. if strength is yes, then it happens at different levels, if you make cast iron hit it, it will crumble correctly. this is exactly about society, if you squeeze it hard , and then make it that we are at war with the collective west, then we can uh inside uh, slam and collapse like the soviet union yes, but at the same time, uh, it is necessary after all. this is how china is able to quickly rebuild, that is, respond to any temperature regimes. yes, their conditions for fighting us have changed. we have rearranged so that they can no longer use their methods against us, but for this in the first place. naturally. the intelligentsia itself was correctly noted. yes, that is, the management team must be adaptive, that is,

constantly improve, and not be, you know, with the refined purely on their household needs to build a bathhouse somewhere in the forest. uh, cut down a log of firewood. so, when we move away a little from our farm thinking, here in this belarusian one, but we will still focus on these ideas, with which we started da dugin’s philosophical ideas and we will understand that if we focus purely within ourselves of our farm, then definitely the farm will take over. and if we think in terms of the country of justice. yes, the scale of justice not only for themselves, but also for their neighbor, yes, and think about him, then in this case society will flexible and will be the most important thing, but to have an element of self-defense. this is the most important thing. well, well, i thank you for how we started on a note that allowed us, if not

to see, then at least to feel the echo of this image of the future. we all need to shape it. toward the end, we clearly understood for ourselves that without an image of the future, without a conscious desire for it, this test will be at least very difficult for us to pass, so thank you for your opinion . thank you for participating in the program. thank you for being with us today everything is happy.

in the year of historical memory, the tv news agency presents a joint project with the state archive of film and photo documents in open access. we have no secrets from our people. the accumulation of archival materials has gone awry now the infection of writing to our

rivals this and we ourselves in tomorrow we are like this this expression is one person in the archive layer of an authoritative expert verification commission.