why did the 18 dune surrender artillerymen not soups for shelling and the defensemen who were ready to surrender to the gasboys upon the arrival of semyonovich’s houses with the moron of the king with chic fireworks, comforts, powder, rockets would be baptized on pershenovita for such fun, kazimi meant ionez dated where for more ale yak lord flight range, iago’s head drank, and so on. and that to fire a rocket with a few dzhastok older gunpowder, burning out the cameras, and it leans back , the rocket becomes lighter and stretching out the imclives. here they are throwing us another camera and that’s all higher. maybe cosmos, who came to his birthplace on maru's bulbs, can hold out experiments. oleg king at vladislav's. he referred him to science. not for this people war with the turks. most jazz. give those you are the best of all kazimierz battles and sieges are not up to the house. only one

fact stood out to dosa semenovich. under his refusal without documents, he gave out to the soldiers, yaks and went to the front, muskets and children from the warehouse, and then tore off a cap for such arbitrariness, the bureaucrats covered the serpents of the wives. kazimir knows, went to ugoland and fucked up sex there duke leopold wilhelm with signs of the kind of rabsburg, and he was not only a warrior, ticked science with the rest of the lead and sauveshi was on minavita. the ghetto, and the simplest one is not particularly there, they completed the propanavalo friendly. why did semyonovich happily sit down at his amsterdam laboratory from a chimney with jasom and black smoke was coming out, and he himself won, and jasom of ore, his neighbor with a card. it is the worst of all our winds to let thousands have a 650 year monsterdame published a book. artis magnai artel. paradise, great bridge artery. pain for 300

on the sides, two hundred little ones by the table and a lot of them are hidden. what kind of yashin down was whispered from father to son with an anchor from black powder, one of his immediately bulging material yak crushed a smoke barrier on the battlefield, jim died caliber and wahoo had the core of this prince and sectioned off the missiles with the participants. shmat uvagena did not return him. there are 250 good olegs here. tsiolkovsky, here’s his sham, not according to vera, this is the soprano sensation of the yaku-17 stage, they could have thought of such a thing prince semenovich had a three-stage rocket refueling scheme. yes, not one of several variants of pain in zato and semenovich. he expressed the thought that missiles would be able to fly aiming without windy expanses. the fire flows out, spinning its power from the great turbidity, throwing a rocket at per pis. he is 300 gonde before

the launch of a piece plantain of the earth and the flight of a man near space, the great bridge of artillery, a book similar to a culinary one, and she propagated the recipes for a person’s pie over the forces of fire and stretch and neodylo, which from once became utter bestseller translations were not brought to offend 1651 in french 1676 in german 1729 in england english jet's orphans went to neural clocks were yak-navy kouts, so the emperors newton peter the first call napoleon bonaparte and wuxia are the pct public. and besides the least, i learned from semenovich’s book about our swimsuit, and away from the monarchy, roses are new on the streets of cities. and so she herself on the luah drops, news, steamed waves. show game baroda woody dances semenovich immediately thought about those. how would you say today?

how to pick up an interest gitoshow stubborn jazz people lyudmistil and a trigon teaser from other tommy the rest of the artillerymen, i'll tell you about such a nakhodka of mine and for which you will all go crazy. oh, oh, all our vedas are getting tired and she walks alone. many are less pissed. you replace them, the sensible tajirahtoved yourself the heat of the book for years, the heat of the alet, what kind of find you are, so no one has brought to the laboratory shortly before the release of the book. semenovich zhazdarusya mentioned handwritten outerza-inu. i think jim is the genie of them who said that the dead ones are to blame akh became a virara of unhurried experiments. there was also another version of casimir. these colleagues scored who the thieves were not aware of, semyonovich, who published the treatise, discovered both the killers and the ocean and knew only the best for this, many could hate him. oleg zimirma usually betrayed

professionally hidden slander, and he, on his barge, at once itchy rabble, the warriors become more and more greedy and razburalnye, i spit it out with someone to the left litvin. a nishakan thought came that the olives would become available to the mustache, and the paraton would appear and the zhor would not fight as a male, they pressed back the war pit failed, and letim could know that i was his book on tradition and moderate metah. just father her and they will live on the letter of all sorts of hack foot crocks of the conquered space to mention.

hello greetings to everyone who is now with us welcomes the guests of today's edition of the event a lot. so let's not waste any time, let's get started. that's why on the eve of an interesting meeting between alexander lukashenko and alexander dugin, a famous russian philosopher. let's remember one of the fragments once i remember too rudely i will say giggled there are some in russia, as we call them and i call them liberals. uh, when did i say the time would come? it was said up to a year or two ago, something in 1920, when

putin and i would have to stand back to back and shoot all of our friends. how it is? that what we see today is exactly what we are going today, therefore, we need to stay close to each other. you don't have to try. eh, somehow get around each other. no need. there is something to share here, like our common victory in the great patriotic war. everything is clear, roles. uh, distributed the story is long uh and a person like you, analyzing events in the form of realities uh, will do. i think the correct conclusions. and not only this is my interest. yes, interesting to belarus and russia is the interest of the russian belarusian people , all russians and belarusians, in general, this president does not have simple meetings. the court of these, what is going on publicly, but andrey evgenievich what do you think about what happened and what was it about in the first place, this meeting immediately came to mind. uh, wonderful roman bulgakov,

master margarita, when you remember playing woland has chess and there was such a phrase. it seemed that the best chess magazines in the world would give everything to print the course of this game like this. i am sure that the best political science philosophical ideological journals in the world would give a lot, if not everything, in order to publish what these 2 hours of conversation were about, after all, alexander gelievich. dugin - it's not easy, there a political scientist is a political strategist, even a political analyst is a philosopher who conceptually scientifically substantiated another conservative, yes, the right one, but a different way of development of civilization. he did not take only the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long review interviews with him, he explained the school of political realism in the usa, the engineer's brush explained who these people were? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will

politics develop further here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. there, after all, it was not by chance that during this interview it was said that yes , we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has, uh, a clear concept of the ideology of the future, but there is still no slogan that can pick up people to lead him, belarus is interesting and important, because we actually choose a different social one for the last quarter of a century, sometimes we will stipulate the socialist path development. and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation that we will lay under our state building, while it is largely groping due to the position of the president, by the way, this is an important point. look us and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko was told that the necessary dialogue does not exist in the form in which it would be enough to respond to the western ideology that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but what

's the difference? look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we see in the west, these new, let's say, globalist values ​​that break family values, which, well , even break common sense. and we see what tension is being created within society, and here, on the contrary, they go to what is needed the idea to take from the people themselves to develop it further alexei and how are you? you know, when we, uh, now collide in general in uh in matters of confrontation. oh well, some say the collective west is the collective east first. we uh should be talking about the opposition of just ideas. yes, and even uh, the theory of propaganda, uh, which is a book on propaganda that arose after the first world war. it was clearly stated there that the key war is unimportant in the war on the battlefield, the war in the military information space. it

always war. ideas against ideas. and of course, now when a we a see an aggravation. uh, this fight is already uh, all latent confrontations have turned into open ones, and the confrontation between us and the collective west, we need a single idea that unites not just belarusians within itself, but unites a large space. this is space. uh, it should end not only with russia, it should end. and then it should unite the entire eurasian space, plus, uh, pull up asia because, otherwise the collective west, with their uh, power, with their financial and economic possibilities, of course, can impose its surface. what idea with what now? if they don’t fight, then they oppose each other. the fact of the matter is that if philosophers sit and try to develop an

idea, an idea is groped for, that is, there is only one opposition left to express it. yes , to be true. to the collective west, the idea is simple. this is the idea of ​​uh, profit and uh, net profit and the withdrawal of net profit in all possible ways. what is our idea? here is the most. most importantly, now let's listen to a long-standing original fan of both belarus and your course. i think i never doubted it, and even in the most difficult times there were difficult times between our states. with all my heart, with all my heart, with all my capabilities, i supported you and supported the line that you brought out and did not allow your state to be plundered. you did not make the mistakes that we made in the nineties and are now correcting with such difficulty. and i just sincerely bow to your authority in front of your courage in front of yours, and convinced steadfastness in the salvation

of the belarusian people belarusian statehood. and that means ourselves means ours. that means our union belongs to the state , and today we are just like you said, uh, shoulder back in the back more than us, not everyone else ended up somewhere either in a neutral position or in the opposite position, and here we stand and defend our slavic russian belarusian idea together - it's like observing for yourself. this is the confrontation between the idea and the meanings that were spoken about. yesterday i i fully agree with the previous ones, my colleagues and i are with the upcoming ones. but i would like to give, when you say that we are trying to find ideas, but remember, there was the soviet union, when in the sixties. uh, colonialism collapsed and many african countries came to us and why they supported us, yes, and now they began to support us, let's say , because they saw that this world is more just, therefore, of

course, the word justice. it is so somewhat abstract, so i agree with alexei. what else works out, what do we need we invest in the concept of justice, but, in principle, when we speak for justice. and so even our confectionery factory expressed, no matter how it was. a marketing ploy, so to speak, but nevertheless for justice and therefore, uh, when, uh, mr. dugin says that uh, so we express the idea and the two of us. e, together, that is, two countries e, not only the two of us, because look, african countries also support us. let's remember when the leader spoke, mm, united there, what is it called? in general, it unites all african countries, and it said that we will never support, the united states sent me this speech. and that means he will support everything that happens. here, uh, so to speak, what russia is doing and, uh, belarus, so you can’t say that we are just the two of us, of course, it all

depends on how it goes, how the operation in ukraine goes, so many fear that if there is a loss, then there will be a loss and that's why they seem to have calmed down, but in fact there are not two of us. there are more of us. i think that this is a meeting, in general it is iconic reflects tectonic shifts in the russian elite. actually not so long ago. well , dugin was considered marginal liberals. that is, he was pushed aside, uh, far to the periphery of it, so to speak about the government on radio television experts and so on. in general, uh, by and large. they giggled at him , gloated that he was a man from the past, that his ideas remained in the last century and died, and now it turned out what is actually happening now. well, let's say it can be said about the conduct of the behavior of russian society. well one thing can be said that the liberal part of the russian elite is losing its position. she

, uh, had to show her true face. and someone, indeed, as dugin said, turned out to be on the other side of the front, someone turned out to be neutral. and so, in general, the patriotic part is gaining strength and now it is choosing the russian higher power. in fact, he has no choice. it must rely on patriotic forces. i would add a counter-interest here. the president said that he was interested in meeting with rice gel, than and i would dream up so much on about the interest of e dugin himself to meet with the belarusian leader. e for the belarusian president is really the way out of our ideas of the belarusian position to the broad traditionalist russian society and conveying the meaning, and not only russian, because dugin has been translated, if i’m not mistaken, into 50 languages ​​​​of the world and his conservative view of the world is conservative in the right sense, then there is conservative development, not stagnation, and it is in demand

all over the world. but alexander gelievich and in several interviews that i wrote down. he talked about it, belarus is important. by the fact that it is trying to apply and work out a great theory, a beautiful harmonious theory, in practice, that is, belarus is trying to build a society of social justice, a society for developing its sovereignty in absolutely hostile conditions, it is trying in practice, which is very important to work out great philosophical ideas concepts. moreover, it is also important to understand what opposes us. here the barrel has spoken. but this is really a theory of racism, a theory of superiority, when declares from a high rostrum that the european union and the liberal world as a whole. this is a flowering garden. and the rest of the jungle, that is, the thought of us, is perceived as monkeys from the jungle. this is repetition. uh, this absolutely russian nazi. uh,

ideologies, white man supremacy, that 's uh, white's burden. yes, this is concentrated racism that lives in this liberal elite. and by the way, alexander is fighting against this racism, let's just go to the thesis that irina vasilievna said that it is very important to understand that we are not alone today. yes, in close combat. we are back to back, but there are a number of states that are carefully watching and worrying about our victory. and i would like to turn, of course, to the country that was rich these days and to meet the accents that were voiced. we will inevitably turn to them for a long time to come the capital of kazakhstan meetings with the presidents of kazakhstan, turkey, the prime minister of pakistan, and, of course, communication on the sidelines is often no less important than, uh,

the negotiations themselves. with the aggravation of the situation around the perimeter. i would not want this escalation to happen, let's stop the war and come to an agreement. here is irina vasilievna if you look even earlier, not so long ago it was samarkand now shanghai sliding cooperation now is this meeting. and uh, the formation of the same brix, we heard that, with reference to the president of south africa, saudi arabia, expresses a desire to join. it already completely different. what is a palette. but if we return to this asian format. can we say that a dynamically new world order with the center in asia is being formed right before our eyes, of course, and in addition, do not forget that when we say that and not only we say, and everyone says that globalization has ordered to live a long time. uh, i want to say that she ordered to live long in the format, as she was understood, the united states and that means today. she will go perfectly

different format. mothers of the generalization of large regional macro-regions and what is happening here is e scos. eh, so i was going to. uh, so what's going on here is this meeting, it shows that the configuration will be completely different. she will change. and what is typical, what will develop, and well as it shows. eh, statistics for us is developing at a very fast pace in asia a and, accordingly, asia has the greatest prospects. not even from a point of view. we will talk there, ideology. what ideology and so on. if we look at the economy, asia shows, well, an example of uh, in development, it's not only china although china has a little bit. here , the pace is slowing down, mainly india, and all the neighboring countries have potential, even if today the pace may not be high enough. they have a very large potential, which is why we participate. here in these meetings in meetings we are, in general, european.