now in mind, the events are completely unprepared, because there is a war near us. hmm. we have a danger on the external frontiers in this situation, self-rational is the centralization of power on the one hand, and on the other hand. we promised people that there would be a redistribution and the question would be what to do? what to do, you have already made a decision in a referendum, everything that is written in the constitution will be so and you will not see there that lukashenka will appoint something. you will not see this there. all the belarusian people's assembly is the highest body representative power, everything will be carried out exclusively by election, with the exception of people who will occupy places there ex officio. well, let's say the incumbent president is the prime minister, deputies of parliament, senators, who have already been elected by the people. but you will see this, this is a common lie and the tripology of everyone will be appointed by

president lukashenka, about 1,000 people will be enough, whom he coordinates and appoints. assembly members. so the president. now without vns, he personally appoints many of his people, why should he also appoint everyone else there, which prevents him from leaving everything as it is now to retain power. even if it will be a body directly in the national assembly, but all the same, as long as lukashenka remains the president, in fact it will be with him. but after that. this is a completely different conversation. and the most important thing from the question and answer is that it is still the centralization or decentralization of power right now. how much does centralization cost? igor no there is no decentralization and cannot be, as the president was the head of state, he will remain the people will elect the president. i would probably

be more of a supporter of the chinese version. i congratulated my friend comrade sitting pina on the victory, well done uh, the fight was. god forbid, but the professionals decided to be or not to be and secretly decided, perhaps, and we had to come to this, but i, uh, i am a supporter of this, but i felt and understood, i was mistaken, i was not mistaken, that, well, people ours is not yet ready to give its right to someone even trusted, uh, vnc individuals, avoid the president. well, it seems to me that there is no need to rush here. it can already, under the second president of the third, you will resolve this issue so that they do not again accuse me of doing this for myself again. everything will be dima more critical than ever. remember more democratic than ever with me. there are guesses what

the president had in mind, but for now i’ll keep my thoughts to myself. let’s talk better about the military component of the friday trip of the head of state, where alexander lukashenko got acquainted with domestic novelties of drones and means of suppressing enemy unmanned forces with regards to everything that is happening here and the deployment of a joint allied grouping regime. who from the meeting are the training grounds of everything that some call the military, i repeat. i understand very well and categorically support those who i am for world peace. i am also behind both hands, but i also understand that world peace has never been like this, and there never will be for the last six months, the words we hear. i am for world peace. it's not complete true, this phrase sounds more honest. i am for peace at home, or i am for peace near my home, or i am for peace in the whole world, otherwise somehow the world has not become close to me, let's personally take a cutoff,

the beginning of mine. autumn of the fourteenth in 8 years there was no peace in the whole world for sure. it's just that he was far from us, syria afghanistan africa latin america and so on, but the thesis. i for peace in the whole world was not relevant with us, because we had peace near us. why globalization is populism, everyone cares only about their own interests. and this is generally fine. i am also for world peace, but if war is inevitable, but there are options, where will the hegemons shoot, ukraine near us, taiwan syria or honduras with all due respect to the taiwanese with the syrians or honduras? i'd rather have the hegemons shoot from their territory. they are near my motherland. and the president met with the philosopher alexander dugin the other week. here it seems to me that she fragments to split up their conversation makes little sense. it needs to be heard and appreciated in its entirety. although not the whole conversation. even got into public space, but a couple of fragments still deserve special attention,

for example, a few weeks ago, one of the whites, who was so coincidentally, then quickly beaten in poland, tried to get me to talk. he is a national idea. i replied. that's right, as i think that all their talk about the national idea. it was pain and transfusion from empty to empty. it's just that these conversations, apparently, are not financed, but i'm not going to take part in this. i have no idea. what is the national idea belarus, i really just do not understand why it must be. as for me, the basis of the national idea of ​​any country, even belarus, even russia, even in germany, even god forgive me, in the usa there should be common sense and logic. what is the national idea of ​​france god knows what else god knows britain belgium switzerland and the rest. what is their national idea is all blah blah. but ideology is different. they talked about state ideology, ideology in general, and that we don’t have it in russia, all the more so.

it is too. truth. i was offered a sea of ​​ideas, which well with the proposal to the state i answer them all, because they do not fall on the heart of man. what kind of idea that can not master the masses, as the class said and does not fall on the heart, but this is not an idea and it cannot be a state idea. well , nothing has been done so far. unfortunately, i will continue to believe that tactically our ideology is described by one simple word justice i want to live in a country where it will be fair and honest, and in the same way it will be fair and honest if i not only want, but also do for this something, because if they do it alone, and the result of the investment of forces is a fair honest world will be distributed evenly between everyone and those who have invested the effort and those. who is just tel, then this will be unfair and dishonest, but at the same time you can say whatever and however

you like, as much as we have the strength. how much opposition from this liberal elite, we call it the sixth column, there is the fifth, which rages on the streets, says, down with putin, down with lukashenka gave russia well, down with everything. and there is a sixth column. here we are with her clashed to a much greater extent, their platform is the same as that of the fifth absolutely, pro-western hmm continuation of liberal reforms, the collapse of our states, but they do not say down with putin and say, long live putin long live putin, my support is excellent. everything is fine, but they do the same. this is the sixth column - this is the worst. you know how easy it is to call those whom dugin wrote down in the sixth column. pseudo-patriots, the democratic leader makes the most popular decision, and the leader of truth makes the most correct one. and if the leader understands that the decision is popular with the audience wrong he must he is obliged at any cost to make an unpopular but right decision, despite the

resistance of the wrong part of the audience. understand my words, as you please, but only there would be no war in belarus now and there is only one option. at first , my name is igor tur. that was my propaganda. so, the sugar beet harvesting season has already begun and our processing plants have already started. actually for processing. what forecasts do you make in this regard? will we sugar, is there enough sugar for everyone in our country there are four large sugar factories this year, we launched the factories earlier than last year, this is primarily

due to the prospects for the harvest and the need to have time to process the entire volume before the end of the current year this year we plan to receive. eh, the sugar crop is much larger than we received last year, about 20-25% is expected to increase in the collection of sweet root crops. what it's going to do is give us enough sugar to meet our needs. e republic belarus e, by the end of this year we expect to consume about 380.000 tons of sugar. this is taking into account the needs and industrial processing enterprises that use sugar. this is the need of our domestic market for home consumption purposes. we see that sahara today is a rather significant position. uh, each family and

the share of consumption and consumer basket. uh, a significant amount, so we plan to store up to 400,000 on sugar for storage next year to be able to sell during the off-season. well , we still have more sex harvest this year. uh, this year the export of sugar sugar, which we produce and will produce only this year, will be about 115-130.000, t, which we will ship in the period from september to december, this will allow us, uh, to pay off uh, beet producers to the end this year in full. uh, next year we will form 2 1/2 times more uh. e export potential for sugar than it was this year, taking into account how the price environment will develop. we for ourselves, we see the direction of sugar sales. first of all, this is the russian federation, this is the people's republic of china.