families and shares of consumption and in the consumer basket e, essentially-volume, so next year we plan to store up to 400,000 tons of sugar for storage in order to be able to sell during the off-season. well, what about the college crop, after all, we have more exports this year this year, sugar, uh sugar, which we produce and will produce only this year will be about 115-130.000, t which we will ship to the period from september to december, this will allow us to, uh, pay off uh, manufacturers beets until the end of this year in full. uh, next year we will form 2.5 times more e. e export potential for sugar than it was this year, taking into account how the price situation will develop we see for ourselves the direction of sugar sales. first of all, this is the russian federation, this is the people's republic of china. these are countries. uh, east asia is tajikistan

uzbekistan kyrgyzstan that is, in fact, our traditional buyers, who have been forming a pool of buyers for a number of years belarusian sugar. now there is active work going on. it is understood how enterprises work in this direction, of course, today. as we continued to work, we continue to work with the countries of the european union of a separate position. uh, today deliveries are, uh, increasing and the share of e towards the european union is not maintained at about its, uh, ten to twelve percent. basically, these are oil and fat products that we load there. uh, today we are actively working with the russian federation to increase supplies. e in the direction. e russia's share. probably, if we take all the enterprises of the concern to unite and subtract

the total share, then it will be about 665%. well, in which markets do you want to gain a foothold today? you know, today we are actively trying to gain a foothold in the market of the people 's republic of china. if back in 2017 the share of e-supplies there did not exceed one percent, then according to the results of the past period of this year, eight months. today we are reaching a share, 7% - this is already such a volume that allows us to say that the market perceives this as enough hunting for our products. today we are competitive in this market. despite the fact that e it is quite global and is present in this market. uh, probably, almost all global manufacturers, respectively, uh, have to compete today not only in terms of quality, but also in terms of the cost of products, taking into account, again, logistics and remoteness. uh, we are today. hmm. we are getting out of a foothold in almost all e in all

countries of our e economic union. today we are actively working with friendly countries that are also interested in supply of our products and both in terms of export, we are also interested in the supply of imported e positions, which are critical for us and are not produced in the republic of belarus. e, due to its own, including natural e features of climates.

belarus is not private, forests are blocky rivers and lakes. nekronotaya nature from what is not maxim to tear from the neck and i'm not belarus - it's people. we open them for you. we bring the traditions of calmness and at the same time we change our views on the sound. and robinga, you are light, i am to the magolites.

belarusians are so formidable ali their poisonous one love of the people's earth belarus 20 shatyrs hello, i welcome everyone who is now with us . so let's not waste time, let's get started. that's why on the eve of an interesting meeting between alexander lukashenko and alexander dugin, a well-known russian philosopher, let's remember one of the fragments once. i remember too rudely , some in russia giggled, as we call them liberals, when i said that the time would come. until about

two years ago it was said that something in nineteen-twentieth year, when putin and i will have to stand back to back to shoot back all the works. how it is? that what we see today is exactly what we are going today, therefore, we need to stay close to each other. you don't have to try. eh, somehow get around each other. no need. there is something to share here, like our common victory in the great patriotic war. everything is clear, roles. eh, the story has been distributed for a long time uh and a person like you, analyzing events in the form of reality uh, will do. i think the correct conclusions. and this is not only my interest, but the interests of belarus and russia this is the interest of the russian belarusian people of all russians and belarusians, in general, this president does not have simple meetings. especially those that take place in public. but andrey

evgenievich what do you think about what happened and what was it about in the first place, you know , i immediately remembered this meeting. uh, the wonderful roman bulgakov master and margarita, when you remember, played chess at woland's and there was one like that. for what better, er, chess magazines of the world, would give everything to print the course of this game, so i'm sure that the best political science philosophical ideological journals of the world, would give a lot, if not everything, in order to publish what these 2 hours of conversation were about. see alexander gelevich. dugin it's not easy, there is a political scientist, a political strategist, even a political analyst is a philosopher who conceptually scientifically substantiated another conservative, yes, right, but other way of civilization development. he did not take only the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long review interviews with him, he explained - explained the school of political

realism in the usa kisenger explained who these people are? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will politics develop further here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. it was not by chance that during this interview it was said that yes, we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has, uh, a clear concept of the ideology of the future, but a slogan that can pick up there are no people to lead him yet, belarus is interesting and important, because we actually choose a different social one for the last quarter of a century, sometimes we will stipulate the socialist path of development. and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation that we will lay under our state building, while it is largely groping due to the position of the president, by the way, this is an important point. look , we and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko said that the necessary dialogue does not exist

in the form in which it would be sufficient to respond to the western dialogue that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but what's the difference look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, not to create it from above, what we see, probably in the west, these new, let's say , globalist values ​​that break family values ​​that are, well, healthy even break the meaning. and we see what tension is being created within society, and here, on the contrary, they are moving towards the fact that it is necessary to take the idea from the people themselves to develop it further. alexey and how are you? you know, when we, uh, now collide in general in uh in matters of confrontation. yes, some people say the collective west with the collective east first. we uh should be talking about the opposition of just ideas. yes, and even uh, the theory of propaganda, uh, which is a book on propaganda that arose after the first world war. it was clearly stated there that the key war is unimportant in the war on the battlefield, the war

in the military information space. it 's always war. ideas against ideas. and of course, now when a we see an aggravation. uh, this fight is already uh, all latent confrontations have turned into open ones, and the confrontation between us and of the collective west, we need a single idea that united not just belarusians within itself. yes, it united a large space. this is space. uh, it must end not only with russia, it must end, and then it must unite and unite the entire eurasian space, plus e pull up e asia because, otherwise, the collective west with their e power with their financial and economic capabilities, of course, can impose their victory. what idea with what now? if they do not fight, then they oppose each

other, the fact of the matter is that if philosophers they sit and uh, try to develop an idea an idea, it is groped by one opposition, there remains to express it. yes, to return. to the collective west, the idea is simple. this is the idea of ​​uh, profit and uh, net profit and the withdrawal of parts of the profit in all possible ways. and here is our idea, this is the most important one now, a longtime original admirer, uh, of both belarus and your course. i think i never doubted it, and even in the most difficult times there were difficult times between our states . i am with all my heart with all my heart supported you with your capabilities, supported the line that you brought out and did not allow your state to be plundered. you did not make the mistakes that we made in the nineties and are now correcting with such difficulty. and i just sincerely

bow before your authority, before your courage before yours, and by convinced steadfastness, the salvation of the belarusian people of the belarusian statehood. and that means ourselves means ours. instu means our union in the state and today we are just like you said, shoulder to back in the back more not all the rest of us ended up somewhere either in neutral positions or in opposite positions, and here we stand and defend our slavic russian belarusian idea together - as you can see for yourself. this is the opposition of the idea of ​​meanings, about which they spoke. yesterday, i fully agree with the previous ones with my colleagues and the upcoming ones. but i would like to give, when you say that we are trying to find ideas, but remember, there was the soviet union, when in the sixties. uh, colonialism collapsed and a lot from african countries came to us and why they supported us, yes, and now they began to support us, let's say

, because they saw that this world is more just, therefore, of course, the word justice. it is so somewhat abstract, so i agree with alexei. what else is needed to work, what do we invest in the concept of justice, but, in principle, when we speak for justice. and so even our confectionery factory expressed, no matter how it was. uh, so to speak, a marketing ploy, but nevertheless for justice and therefore, uh, when, uh, mr. dugin says, uh, so we express both the idea and the two of us. e, together, that is, two countries e, not only the two of us, because look, african countries also support us. let's remember when the leader spoke, m-m, it is united there. what is the name of? the common one unites all african countries, and he said that we will never support, the united states sent me this speech. and that means he supports everything that happens. here, uh, so to speak, what

russia is doing and uh, belarus, so you can’t say that we are just the two of us, of course, it all depends on how it goes, how the operation in ukraine goes, so many fear that if there is a loss, then there will be a loss, and therefore they seem to have calmed down, but in fact, and there are not two of us. there are more of us. i think that this is a meeting, in general it is significant, it reflects tectonic shifts in the russian elite. actually not so long ago. well, dugin was considered marginal liberals. that is, he was pushed aside, er, far to the periphery of it, so to speak about government radio television experts and so on. in general, uh, by and large. they giggled at him, gloated that he was a man from the past, that his ideas remained in the last century and died, and now it turned out what is actually happening now. well, let's say it can be said about the conduct of the behavior of

russian society. well, one thing can be said that the liberal part of the russian elite is losing its positions. she, uh, had to show her true colors. and someone, indeed, as dugin said, turned out to be on the other side of the front, someone turned out to be neutral. and so, in general, the patriotic part is gaining strength and the power of the russian higher she chooses now. in fact, she has no choice. it must rely on patriotic forces. i would add a counter-interest here. the president expressed his interest in meeting with rice geich. and i would so fantasize about the interest of dugin himself to meet with the belarusian leader. e for the belarusian president is really the way out of our ideas of the belarusian position to the broad traditionalist russian society and conveying the meaning, and not only russian, because dugin has been translated, if i'm not mistaken, into 50 languages of the world and its conservative view of the world is

conservative in the right sense, that is, conservative development, not stagnation, and it is in demand all over the world. and here is alexander gelievich in several interviews that i recorded with him. he talked about it, belarus is important. by the fact that it is trying to apply and practice a great theory, a beautiful harmonious theory, that is, belarus is trying to build a society of social justice, a society for developing its sovereignty in absolutely hostile conditions, and it is trying in practice, which is very it is important to work out big philosophical ideas concepts. moreover, it is also important to understand what opposes us. here barrel let it slip. but this is really a theory of racism, a theory of superiority, when it is declared from a high rostrum that the european union is a liberal world as a whole, it is a flowering garden. and the rest of the jungle, that is, the thought of us, is perceived as monkeys

from the jungle. this is repetition. uh, this absolutely russian nazi. uh, ideologies, white man supremacy, that 's uh, white's burden. yes, this is racism concentrated lives in this liberal elite. and by the way, alexander is fighting against this racism, just in time for the thesis that irina vasilievna said that it is very important to understand that we are not alone today. yes, in close combat. we are back to back, but there are a number of states that are carefully watching and worrying about our victory. and i would like to turn, of course, to astana, which was rich these days and meet the accents that were voiced. we will inevitably contact them for a long time to come. the capital of kazakhstan i remember hosting the sixth summit meeting on the interaction of dimensional trust in asia alexander lukashenko became one of the key figures of this form. bilateral meetings with the presidents of kazakhstan and turkey, the prime minister of pakistan and, of course, communication on the

sidelines are often no less important than, uh, the negotiations themselves. with the aggravation of the situation along the perimeter, i would not want this escalation to happen if let's stop the war and agree. here is irina vasilievna, if you look even earlier, not so long ago it was samarkand shanghai, cooperation is hidden now this is the meeting. and uh, the formation of the same brix, we heard that, with reference to the president of south africa, saudi arabia, expresses a desire to join. it's already completely different. what is a palette. but if we return to this asian format. can we say that a dynamically new world order with a center is being formed right before our eyes, and in addition, do not forget that when we say that and not only we say, and everyone says that globalization has ordered a long live. uh, i want to say that she ordered to live long in the format, as she was understood,

the united states and that means today . she will go completely different. format in the format of regionalization of large regional macro-regions and what is happening here is e scos. eh, so i was going to. uh, so what's going on here is this meeting, it shows that the configuration will be completely different. she will change. and what is typical, what will develop, and well as it shows. uh, us statistics are developing very rapidly asia a and respectively oasia. the biggest prospects. not even from a point of view. we will talk there, ideology. what ideology and so on. if you look at the economy, asia shows, well, an example, er, in development, it's not only china although china has a little bit. here , the pace is slowing down, mainly india, and all the neighboring countries have potential, even if today the pace may not be high enough. they have a very large potential, which is why we participate. here in these

meetings in meetings we are, in general, european state. we are in europe and by the way, this is the last meeting. uh, it’s written in their charter that only an asian state can become a member, then i think, how will we get there, but we are part of a union state, and through the union state we fit in very nicely, and many people laugh into this system what the asians say here they say we are europeans and uh, so to speak, where are we going. we are going in the absolutely right direction, but because, apart from markets, and apart from that, what we will have and we now have. we now we are cooperating with china enough, but widely and deeply. this is our strategic partner that we will get more new partners that our markets will expand. yes, yes, i want to say that here we are, in general, ordinary people are watching our programs.

these are not just markets, these are jobs, which means that jobs will remain . the prospects for both our industry and our agriculture. yes, uh, so the united states is sanctioning uh. china on the transfer of certain technologies is associated with semiconductors, but do not forget that belarus - in the days of the soviet union it was a republic in which electronics developed, uh, we, uh, had good schools at that time. it is necessary to renew it is necessary to raise precisely this is the direction. you can see how many universities we have graduating specialists related to electronics with programming, that is, this is a promising direction. we need to engage and maybe engage together. e with china uh-huh and alexey but uh hmm china after the congress will begin to change the configuration of e in asia, given its scale in general, in general,

maybe even the world configuration or they are here a policy of cautious thoughtful development they will continue, you know, if you read all the information that is now coming out, uh, in china they are actually now solving their internal problems very strongly , first of all, related to uh, decision making system. and yes, we know that they have announced a campaign of the so-called tigers and flies to fight corruption at various levels . tigers are the highest composition. uh, flies are petty bribe-takers. yes, that is, in reality, we see that china is in conditions of preparation for a strong confrontation with the collective west, not even the united states of america with western corporations. he understands that at the beginning it is necessary to reorganize within himself for the struggle, so that there is no fifth, sixth and other columns. and this is what they are doing now with them, uh, quite a bit of time. they

understand that the end of 22, the beginning of the twenty- third year, most likely. the distance from the global will go over to their side, everyone will forget about ukraine, they will forget about russia orientation to uh form some kind of uh internal contradictions to provoke protests inside china is already being discussed. yes, the youth is pulling up, so and in reality, but the west and uh, american british corporations do not want to let go. uh, china in the free float before they are, as we have already discussed considered. china is like some kind of jungle where a enterprises should operate. there must be , uh, terrible ecology. uh, kids should be dying of cancer and the rest of them should be

in the green economy, but now we see that over the past 10-15 years, china has been doing everything to become an independent economic player, primarily a financial player, and the west is trying to prevent this regional, well, understandable for the collective west, this is such a collective concept, in general, but let’s say regional opponents - who are they japan south korea yes uh, without uh, us support, these regional leaders don’t know anything, let this be the united states and china this is the main confrontation, that is, it is clear that the united states will not openly fight. they are rather of all, they will pull up, and japan will pull up south korea australia, uh, philippines perhaps yes, uh, confrontation, but uh , the subtlety of uh, chinese, probably, wisdom lies in the fact that china is

proactive. they try to negotiate with everyone in advance. yes, not to go to the confrontation, but to negotiate, and this tactic is not quite, uh, calling with the attempts of the west to impose a conflict. in general, we are talking about these new centers of power. they are not just necessary. they are already inevitable, because andrey evgenievich mentioned. barrel now indeed, when the head of european diplomacy says that the eu is a wonderful garden all around. this wife or a barrel around in this jungle, one must see enemies, then you already know this is not a diplomat. this is rambo first blood, they say it with a smile, look at him the day before, he tried to justify himself and said that he did not want to offend anyone at all. ukraine is also the jungle, he tells. yes, and the west also does not always happen, but as they say. the first impression cannot be made twice. well, that's what is even aggravated, vladimir makeev, by the way, in astana i want to remember this episode. he told an interesting correspondence that he had with one of his colleagues, as he said, vladimir makei and from one very

distant country the size of belarus, i will quote means that this colleague wrote to our minister. as for the sanctions against belarus, russia, vladimir , it turns out that the third secretary of the us embassy is under the most severe pressure on us , forcing us to join one or another sanctions, forcing russia to take specific actions against belarus and other countries that support them are threatened that if you do not do so , your accounts, the united states will be frozen by your relatives. children will not be able to study in the united states of america. we even all your students left the usa, i myself am afraid that this is a gop-stop already with a barrel. it's just scary to say you don't have to drive. so far. maybe it's latin america let's look around the neighborhood. after all, we have recently observed the events in kazakhstan. after all, i think that their essence is that kazakhstan was shown their dependence

on the west, because the main capital of the capitalists. let's just say that kazakhstan 's capital placed abroad is all exported there, not invested in the national economy, but exported there. in addition, the children of the highest elite of the upper strata, kazakhstan study in the same way, therefore kazakhstan is very sensitive to pressure from the west, the same is true of kyrgyzstan and all the other countries of central asia, and even if we take the caucasus, then this is georgia armenia, that is we see that even we don’t have to travel far, and therefore and when we are surprised that our allies in the csto are not pursuing an allied policy. they are held joint exercises by the united states, in which the highest general is present and work out unknown. what options for action does this show, how great is the danger in general, how great is the danger? hidden, so to speak, for the time being by a threat, and you can

understand this plan, that while russia is busy in ukraine, while it is defending our western outpost from belarus, then in the caucasus it is preparing hot points in central asia and so on. that is, there are a lot of pitfalls here, and the policy should be very subtle, pragmatic, and at the same time, like the chinese, the policy should not be ahead of the curve. you have to listen very carefully. uh, european union and american diplomats. here is a colleague. e vladimir makei. e, secretary of state damn, said that the world can only be an american pak with an american, that is, the world can only be american dominance and power. and everything else chinese is bad for everyone. so, without power yet worse. what does this mean, that barrel perceives central europe, asia, latin africa? america is like the jungle and the united states is perceived as the jungle the european

union, it's just that there are monkeys of the first class. they are a little closer and their diet is a little more. that's it, all the difference, so uh china uh. by the way, i advise everyone, a translation into good english has already appeared of the speech of the chairman sitting pina very attentively. watch this performance. this is the highest aerobatics. uh, precisely internal concentration, when everything is not carried out just a performance. this is a systematic work on the bugs. china sees its vulnerabilities. that said about semiconductors. but china has already invested approximately $40 billion equivalent in the development of its chip production in order not to depend on china much. i launched this project eight years ago. uh, according to the essay, the way not to be left alone, not to be left in the ring. unfriendly states are building

infrastructure that stretches to belarus and serbia e, this is the aerobatics of the international politicians. i think e and participation in belarus in all meetings that link the eurasian space are aimed precisely at this. we have a deep vision of our development, and we do not rush about, as alexander gleevich dugin, by the way, also often talks about this. here is such a dashing liberalism, they say. we’ll buy everything up to such a cruel golden running center, up to the board of manners e yes, and we have a slender, logical policy built in the national interests. let's really continue, then. we started with her quite right with the idea of ​​meanings. here is diplomacy about how a new device is being formed, while it is a mess, because it still looks like chaos, and in general. this is how it will end, here in our space. uh, this big operation,

which, by the way, is not limited to just svo, will depend on how this new world order will be, but as far as our security is concerned. here is a more specific question. this is the regional grouping of the union state. here we see that we are already actively unfolding a unit is staying here, including the aviation component as a military expert , or i myself am afraid again. here is how you see this step. well, as i said, this is a safety option. the thing is that there is one mechanized division. uh, in general , it cannot change the strategic situation, but it can reinforce the armed forces of belarus, which is now stretched all over. so to say, the western perimeter , the western northwestern e, we are like a balcony that hangs over the strange nato and ukraine, and if we take the size of our armed forces real bayonets 45.000. if we take the length of the perimeter of this border, it is

almost two and a half thousand there. we have three operational lines of command. this is northwestern western and now southwestern. and if we take our 45,000 and stretch it, we'll smear it. it will turn out that it is impossible to securely close it along this border, so now, of course, the main efforts are being made. uh, this is to the border and there the troops are covering behind the back of the border guards and so on. but , uh, the president warned that the greatest the danger from poland is hidden, maybe pushed back in time, but there is the greatest movement of troops of the group and so on, therefore, in order to fend off a possible breakthrough of some kind. uh danger from an unexpected direction. we need these absolutely logically fair steps. how do you feel about the howl that rises from the south, the west, nato, that's even

stoltenberg. says the president of belarus lukashenko should stop involving the republic in the conflict in ukraine, a country, or rather a representative organization, which occupied rather the entire western measures. that says that we should do things differently. well, here, after all, the whole point is that these guys have very little knowledge of the contractual basis of our relations with the russian federation, and e. regional grouping is from the direct part knows everything does not work. they are well informed. this is a consequence of the union treaty and our documents in the field of military-military technical cooperation, which were adopted on the basis of the union treaty. and if we look at history, then this grouping of teachings unfolds with 2009 and every 4 years this group is deployed on our territory, its advancement to our territory is being worked out. combat

coordination is being carried out here, mixed crews, belarusian-russian units of the unit there, and in general, everything ends with firing exercises and the return of these units home this time. part i suppose will be for a very long time. we have your interests naturally something in our interests. after all, the preamble, what it unfolds. in the event of a threat of aggression in the event of a threat of aggression, that is, if two president decided to deploy this group, which means they recognize that the threat of aggression exists, that is, a purely defensive option does not depend on the events of zelensky’s proposal to call on the belarusian ukrainian border, some international observers. what is this, is this a threat? this is a provocation, this is how it is? well, i think it's an attempt. it means to obscure the situation that is developing on the border, after all. uh, ukraine has concentrated a very solid group of troops there. more than

20.000 some 30.000 if you take territorial troops of the border force, they built a powerful line of fortifications. they blew up the bridges, which they consider the most dangerous, they mined the roads, and in this situation, when they prepared for war and do a lot of things. well, let's just say reconnaissance of provocative actions against belarus to say that some supposedly peacekeepers are needed and observant. this is a mockery of common sense. there is one more point here, and the obvious strategic goal is yes. uh, sobering hot minds. uh, preventively. so prepare for the unexpected. uh, a possible strike on the territory of belarus, but i think that there are many more such , uh, implicit, but very important goals that the russian federation is pursuing first. well, offhand. what the military analysts are talking about is the fog of war, which is, uh, actually understanding how many russian troops there are, nine thousand of them. nine entered the territory of belarus

quite difficult and ukraine will be forced to concentrate part of the reserves, including in the chernihiv region, that is, not transferring them now to the most explosive kherson direction, the second is also not entirely, the obvious goal is the combat coordination of russian and belarusian units. the third is the mastery of those modern weapons that are now at the disposal of the russian federation and belarusian modern weapons include drones, which have been talked about for probably three years now at exhibitions of modern weapons, including in the russian federation . belarus turns out to have, among other things, unmanned attack helicopters western direction. look, the president of poland did not have time for duda to declare that at first he lamented that they did not have their own nuclear weapons, then he said there was a way out. and we will ask the americans to place their arsenal on our territory, and in that literally a couple of days a newspaper is speaking, the commonwealth publishes the results of a sociological survey. the study according to

which they say the majority of poles there 54% support this idea, there 29.5 against many abstained. do the poles really want this? you know it all depends on what questions you ask. if uh. if, yes, how to ask, if they asked you if you want more and russia launched a nuclear strike, then i think that of course everyone would answer no, because the deployment of any nuclear weapons on polish territory automatically makes, uh, these zones are plus uh, headquarters plus major cities, but targets for u targeting nuclear weapons. naturally, russia, yes or that, but nuclear weapons, which in the event of further confrontation can be deployed on the territory of belarus yes, and we won’t talk about this anymore once discussed that our aircraft are equipped with e, in principle, for modernized to carry nuclear weapons, so now for poland and the idea

of ​​​​deploying american nuclear weapons is such a very good business idea. imagine what huge resources will now be thrown into the infrastructure. yes. uh, some kind of nuclear weapon - it will be in the mines or it will be mobile, but in any case, it requires, uh, huge investments and poland's gdp for the next few, there will be just uh, catastrophic plants there for 5-7-10 years. they are will say, look what a polish economic miracle i am again. yes, of course, why is this being done in order to simultaneously weaken germany in the territory where these nuclear weapons are located, yes, and uh, transfer budgets from uh, slightly recalcitrant germany towards uh. poland yes, therefore, all this is more of a financial economic. and the question is, uh, they are trying to hide it under the guise. the russian threat, but in reality, uh,

the same polish elites, are trying to cash in on this. nato is now conducting these their large-scale exercises yes, in the north of uh europe, where it’s absolutely right there up to 60. there, the agency against nuclear weapons does not mean that this base of the royal uh, the air force is extremely brougel. yes, in the province of limburg. this is exactly the place where the us nuclear warhead is located, this information is officially refuted, but nevertheless, the further. it turns out that it’s not just that they fly there and with nato’s nuclear deterrence and defense, words that are incompatible there are always about attack. well , i must say that in general in nato doctrine it is written that in the event of a conflict, it means earlier the soviet union, and now carrier aircraft with russia. this means

that nato countries can be used to strike american nuclear bombs on the territory of the russian federation and its allies, that is, they say in peacetime. so they just train or imitate or throw blanks, but in the case of e, then the outbreak of a military conflict is legal. they can use these nuclear bombs, which are located in six places in europe, in order to to inflict a nuclear strike on the territory, it means russia and belarus well, there are no missiles, there are nuclear bombs. uh, they are simply proposed to be moved from germany, which is rustling, and there it arises, the protest of poland with pleasure, allegedly, allegedly. wants to accept them, indeed, the financial costs must be very large, because nuclear weapons must be stored in certain arsenals of storage, where the temperature is maintained, humidity and a number of security and

so on, that is, this is a huge investment, these structures must be resistant to damaging factors up to and including nuclear explosions in case it means if someone hits, so of course, uh, if hmm poland deploys those weapons. this is a very serious shift in the entire geostrategic situation in our region. we continue lately. the west has again become more active in the belarusian direction , great efforts are being made to expand sanctions on belarus, under which russia is the most active, lithuania estonia, but all this called for belarus to be regarded as a full-fledged ally of russia in fighting in ukraine and the minister of foreign affairs. estonian urnestr, insau stated that his country will steadily support the democratic efforts of the belarusian position of civil society and even expressed the latter about the fact that his country neighbors with belarus they say. it’s very scary, but apparently the minister doesn’t really understand with whom and what they are

next to, and with whom we don’t specially for him, we show a map, belarus estonia is not next to each other, relax and, as they say, study geography irina vasilyevna what there is one jungle everywhere they see the second he is completely afraid of the neighborhood with belarus, forgetting badly taught at school. what kind of politicians are these, this sixth american fleet is already representing the finishing sea, and terrible forces with such and you are absolutely right. and they say the same thing, and analysts say so. and moscow analysts. they say that the youth has come. and i even talked to students. i'm telling you, you are advocating that barrel never grow up. didn't grow up. i'm so holding up, yes, yes, the youth came, which is not frightened still the first did not see the war. uh, i was listening to some lady's story yesterday. e, she talked about how it is possible to make a preventive nuclear strike such a small striker. yes, then they will answer us.

well, then we will already enter, that is, some very strange people, history, they don’t know geography, they don’t know political science, they don’t know, and therefore, for today, these western elites are striving for war, this is true. you say it's scary who we're dealing with. at what level of sonism is it emphasized here? well this one is fine already. come on, finally the anti-hero of our time, barrel, so that without him we would do as quoted. if not, we would have to come up with such a western diplomat, but he 's giving out secrets. it must be urgently changed, because it constantly gives out. that's what they think, here are closed clubs, and he gives it all away. in this case, it is open information. he just voiced it, which means, uh, another 500 million euros will be allocated for the armament of ukraine, uh, i remembered that 500 million euros were allocated before, but the fundamental moment. from where they allocate for service to the war to the last ukrainian from the european peace fund. this is the whole cynicism aleksey that's what kind of people people or this with whom we are

dealing, we have discussed more than once in the framework of this program and on other journalistic platforms that, in principle, then, those who are now in power in the european union it doesn't matter if it's a fucking balti and poland or a in brussels as well. they, basically, all were trained in american schools and in those institutions that finance. that is, either by soros, or by other a-a funds subordinate to the state department, therefore, in reality, these are hired managers fully engaged in washington and london, but they act completely to the detriment of their people, and their european, and countries and uh, now uh, very uh, internal discontent has formed inside these european countries. we see there is discontent among the population, but there is also discontent among the local national capital, which

understands what is going to happen next. ah, the politics of action. here e. hmm such characters. they will inevitably lead either to war or to total impoverishment, impoverishment and bankruptcy. e bank companies. we are already observing, and we are already observing the protests. that is, of course, while europe has, uh, two approaches, either uh, complete self-destruction, or still, uh, some element of the renaissance, but you need to understand that america and we american political technologists monitor the entire political social environment very well, and the environment in europe and any encroachments of any e, some alternative leaders. they immediately destroy media, destroy, and destroy, uh, physically. yes, if suddenly someone changes the line, therefore, we must admit that the us and

london are now such a new roman empire. e, which uh, is not acceptable at all, so that in the uh, subordinated territories, someone could, uh, rebel against uh, the metropolis. here we are talking about the fact that the west obviously and does not hide is already ready to fight to the last ukrainian. we can in this case, conflicts from the side move to any point. and we will substitute there. why, the vassals should die for that for those who direct them to this battle, and with slogans that, going to death welcomes you, they must necessarily express their readiness to protect other people's goals to perish. uh, i want to recall a fragment of the interview, which turned out to be very resonant for alexander lukashenko and the american channel nbc. here is one that touches on this topic. let's hear the world is busy now uh, the problems are looking for the answer to the question. listen to who is to blame, then we will figure it out, who is to blame are dying every day people, let's stop the war and agree, and then we will figure out

who is right? who is to blame and we started the negotiation process, but he has stopped. zelensky was forbidden to negotiate. who can guess from three times he is not independent, and today it’s right to throw fakes somewhere, it’s wrong to blame each other, the wrong way thousands of people die every day, including civilians who are not visible in anything. it's true, so let's stop this conflict the voice of common sense just yes, yes actually the interview. i think there are many sensible politicians and businessmen who are still left. in the united states in western europe, they should listen, because this the voice is not this is not this is not just the position of belarus this is the voice of common sense, which is equally comfortable and convenient. if you follow

it, it is a problem for any normal sovereign country. i agree that there is practically no sovereign policy left in the world; there is practically no one left that they can afford, either very rich and huge countries such as the usa, partly russia , china, partly india, brazil, or countries that have e, backbone and core. here are belarus with such such such such a country more cubes. such a country is venezuela such a country is iran, uh, israel, that is, people who have e, well, you can’t probably say that, well, eggs are just a rod. what about? uh, this conglomerate with irrigation, again i agree and and there was a good idea that for a period of peace and such a calm prosperity of the well-fed, good performers are needed, but as soon as the world starts to move, as soon as

borders begin to change, the interests of capital. uh, these good performers become just good gravediggers of the old system, because nothing but blind stupid execution of orders that he gives them there. uh, washington and either brussels or london, they can't do anything else . and they they are not imprisoned for this, this is scary. well, here is the situation. she is multifaceted. we are often very convenient, of course, to see an exceptional enemy, who is at some distance from you. here we remember, we already touched on the topic there, here is the fifth column. everything, of course, the sixth column. these are people who happen to be in their chest and say there we took lukashenka for putin there, depending on the context, and it seems, like they do, they say absolutely the right things, but in fact they do what destroys the state and interferes with embodiment. there the right idea of ​​developing the economy is mobilizing all the necessary resources of the internal forces for

the task. and there is, of course, direct opposition. these are the cells that are now unpacking the west, and we see how people are being detained in russia now who are trying to carry out, uh, terrorist acts are happening here. here are colleagues recently. ah, belter radio companies showed materials about that, the end were once again detained, and the young guys were completely, who were almost for 500 dollars. they were ready to do everything to start up. yes, that's what we can do here, how to counter this, that , well, the belarusian system gives answers. we are basically good. uh, dealt with this previous uh years. eh yes. now it's just a matter of personal choice, personal decency of these people, but the position of the president. belarus , as i understand it, has always been such that our, uh, managers, firstly, must be grounded in belarus that is their uh, money. their home, their children should not be abroad, and secondly, their internal personal

ambition in politics in the economy. there in business management should coincide with the general trend of the development of the belarusian state, there should be a gathering idea, which, of course, is centered by everyone. she worked well in the russian federation, it was different. i do n’t want to criticize our closest adviser now, but it was different and yes, their situation is more complicated, if only because in different periods there were different ideological attitudes, that is, the ideological attitude that we are going back with us, it means that we want to become the sixth economy in the world and have more goals for us. no, we want a european education system and the soviet one was bad. the russian sovereign is even worse, but there were periods. e, in particular. here. uh, the second chechen war, when yes, the internal concentration reached the other pole and they said that everyone who is not with us is

against us, another very important short message that sounded, and in astana hmm i i suggest listening to him, and he, in general, to some extent, will gather our conversation, because we somehow made some conclusions, understood? this is why the events that we are now observing and discussing, please, what we have been talking about for so long over the years has become a reality, a real hybrid war has been unleashed against all of us. and ukraine is just a pretext here, the plans of individual countries for revenge for the lost companies of the last century have been hatched for a long time, starting, as you know, from the first days after the victory in the great patriotic war, and maybe even earlier. today russia and belarus are at the forefront of economic and financial attacks, but i think everyone here understands that the true goals of western strategists are much wider to divide

the eurasian space into sectors of influence and use our countries. as raw materials and industrial precursors. we need to be prepared for a wide variety of provocations along the entire perimeter of the cis. a recent event in kazakhstan in uzbekistan. convincing and very instructive examples, but this is only the beginning. strength will be tested by everyone irina vasilievna how can we pass this strength test. i want to say a little bit step aside. that's when we're talking, and you've been talking about this estonian president before. yes, he spoke about civil society and they hope to blow up belarus, first of all from the inside, because they understand that we said that when the poles stand there, they are doing this, but the army has become more active and so

on, but they are still trying to blow it up from the inside. uh, that is, as it were, here we will prepare civil society, we, and they they say that we will prepare a civil society that flies from within. so i sometimes discussed with these guys, and they themselves come to a standstill. uh, when i say, well, okay. ah, so they won. you why do they need you if 8 billion people live this, what the president said, that they want to dismember it, moreover, if the people think that they will remain in this territory in a comfortable territory. uh, no matter how they evicted all siberia and forced to mine uranus with their hands, that is, i mean that and these people really come to a dead end, i say, if you are a programmer, you won’t need so many programs that you write, because the population is 8 billion. if they say that you need to destroy half, or even more. why do you have to stay and they also come to a standstill, therefore, when

they say that we need to endure us, probably we still need to change our work with youth. uh, so, well, what we said already when covering the first question on ideology propaganda should be more aggressive. we have some propaganda looser softer propaganda here, uh, alexey correctly said that there, if a point of view appears different from uh, so to speak, the mainstream, but they must be extinguished, uh, and so on. what appears, and here we need not just to arrest them and so on, but to tell what will happen to you. if it suddenly happens, then what are you striving for. i would argue here about both propaganda and its aggressiveness. eh, you know, after all, probably, i think the best example was the e soviet system, when they brought up a critically thinking smart

intelligent person. such a critically thinking person will never become a little baby and will not sip from this trough of grants. he will never betray his country, because he is aware of himself in the state and in society, therefore, it seems to me, it is precisely this critical perception that needs to be developed. reality and believe me, something went wrong with our youth, because the union was destroyed, including by the hands of the communists themselves and many of them. well, a significant part of them went, just the same, to funds with irrigation and became soros, because and this is hmm ideological again , returning to alexander gevich. this is an ideological contest. on the soviet side, it was emasculated by dogmatism. well, i’m not such an old person to remember it to the end, but even i caught the time when people came to me as a young pioneer in bryansk and spoke frank nonsense did not

answer my questions, children’s in many ways naive don’t follow the dogmas went by the ears. and i saw that people who tell me about communism or progressive socialism or restructuring. they don't believe in it themselves. they already had this one in their eyes. uh, wolf shine from close gain. this is not to be allowed. how can we, as the president said, will test everyone for strength, and we will not lose this strength, but go through it. what are you, as it is not paradoxical in this situation we need. to promote the image of the future, the image of the future belarus, it is necessary to put a program. what was the tragedy of the soviet union were unrealistic goals, because well, communism is an unrealistic goal, the way it described that, as they say, according to needs, work as you like, that is, they are taken by the state. yes, and if we

take a global scale uh-huh, so i think we need not only an ideology, but also an image of the future, a real image of the future, to show our guidelines. where are we going where belarus should grow, where it should develop. here are the chinese. here they draw their image of the future. they show where they are developing - their prospects are developing. i think that we also need to draw this real plan for the development of our state and along with how spoken with the suppression of the enemy. we must still strive for the ideal that we will build. alexei and as you can see, you know, i will say from the point of view, probably metal science. if strength is yes, then it happens at different levels, if you make cast iron hit it, it will, uh, crumble correctly. this is exactly about society, if you squeeze it hard, and then make it that we are at war with

the collective west, then we can, uh, inside uh, slam and collapse like the soviet union yes, but at the same time, but it’s necessary all the same here how china can quickly rebuild, that is, respond to any temperature regimes. yes, their conditions for fighting us have changed. we have rearranged so that they can no longer use their methods against us, but for this in the first place. naturally. the intelligentsia itself was correctly noted. yes, that is, the management staff must be adaptive, that is, constantly improve, and not be, you know, refined purely for their domestic needs , somewhere to build a bathhouse somewhere in the forest. uh, cut a log of firewood. that's when we let's move a little away from our farm thinking, into this belarusian one, but let's focus on these