conquer the market to see new models in action. we will be able to in the second half of next year, and this is not only an electric dump truck, but also a hybrid, more than 255,000 foreigners have already visited belarus without a visa , medical tourism is especially popular, and not only in regional centers. so residents of the baltic states and poland are interested in medical laboratory research dental services mri ultrasound in belarus selection of applicants for flights into space on the russian spacecraft soyuzms in belarus selected 20 people in october they will have to pass test in the russian cosmonaut training center named after gagarin, then the main candidate for flights, his understudy, will start training and preparing for a space expedition, the flight will become a landmark and will raise the prestige in belarus as a space power. watch the program of events on thursdays on our tv channel.

my name is igor tur. this is my propaganda

let's start, the past week in the belarusian media field, yes, in fact. it turned out to be, shall we say, ideological. although in the office in the meeting room of the palace of independence or here at the training ground in the brest region they talked about different things, but as for me it’s more a variety of forms, the content is a little different for many years, alexander lukashenko was not just a president there, but the person on whom it was customary to focus on the solution of absolutely all issues from macroeconomics to putting things in order firms are used to it. everyone is accustomed to citizens who today evaluate absolutely any event in the country with a position - whether lukashenka did or did not get used to it. i don't want to persuade. all little desire i have speak the majority. so i’ll say that they’re used to it, and many officials generally want to turn it around. the authorities, the current system of governing the country, in which, to put it bluntly, if the president gave

an order, it must be carried out. and if there was no order, then you can not do it. or you can report to the president so that he makes a decision and gives an order, and only then. see above the system for officials, of course, a very convenient grain to assume that alexander grigoryevich himself was used to such a role in conditions of relative calm everything worked well inside the country and outside, but it became the era of the redivision of the world, where the leader concentrated a huge number of strategic tasks and practice showed that we need to change and, as lukashenka said more than once, the task of the leader is to lead people, even if someone personally, changes are not very convenient, we have to feed our 10 million and 2 million guests who come to us. here the military has just received a report from the russians, who are now coming to us in awe. we did not expect, in general, humanly accepted

fed settled like this should be everywhere fate, ours is like that. another option is war, trust me. i can’t run after everyone and persuade everyone to do it, do it in good faith, everything else is mine. and we will never fight. it was a fragment of a meeting on the entire belarusian people's assembly and the restructuring of the country's governance system. to be honest, i don't understand people who don't quite understand what they are proposing. and what the president wants, as for me it has already been said 20 times, but i will try explain with another very vital example, but let's say debatable. unless i add that i have reason to believe that alexander grigoryevich watches propaganda, as well as in general closely follows the work of all his information fighters. so if someone

evaluates my next example negatively, then i am sure that my words will not surprise alexander grigoryevich. and i think he also thinks that the president of belarus, the guarantor of sovereignty and independence, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, alexander lukashenko, came to power in ninety-fourth and almost three decades successfully was and is the president of his task not to give up sovereignty to develop. well, he fulfilled the well-being of citizens and will fulfill it, but let's talk about the events of the ninety-fourth today, of course, about what kind of deputy lukashenka was, what kind of initiative i proposed and how i gained weight in society, both politically and humanly. is well known, but we are well aware of this, because alexander lukashenko then won, and having won in the ninety-fourth. kebe celik, history would be completely different about the candidate, who was and is well done, but we would have lost much less further vyacheslavkevich chairman of the council of ministers zenon poznyak

head of the strongest faction in the supreme council powerful forces and what is it really, really powerful leaders and both are bypassed by a hot young and sincere lukashenka, who was, of course, noticeable years before the first elections, but still no one for the time being considered him as a threat, but lukashenka, a year or two before the elections, a little-known ka managed to defeat for us, of course, this is good, but this is good. because the first president of belarus turned out to be what people seemed to be. that is exactly what he promised and fulfilled, that is, strong and bright rhetoric was followed by exactly the same strong and bright decisions and in the same direction. and now that same debatable thought for perception, but in general, the electoral system that we still have, in which a year or two before the elections some young and hot candidate. it can flash brightly to promise something to the electorate, not yet possessing a tool to keep promises. this

system is not normal, because in the ninety- fourth, let's say, some other little-known candidate could clearly win, promise to force himself to believe, convince and win, and then do nothing of the promised and surrender the country for the sake of either tactical success or personal appeal and examples from the nineties when countries surrendered to someone who came. the populists had enough power, moreover, the surrender of the country was also rejoicing, because democracy allegedly came to them, they say. this is what we chose person. we are in power here, and then people lost power over their own country, you understand, and the problem with our electoral system today is that the second time we may not be lucky and a young candidate may come to power who will not be like lukashenka again. we are lucky that lukashenka turned out to be like that, but neither in 1994 nor in 2022 is it possible for anyone from the outside

to suddenly gain power over the whole country on the basis of promises and statements. this is not normal, in fact the entire belarusian people's assembly changes in the electoral system should solve this problem because of insuring us from the danger of legally gaining full power over the country by a populist politician and the flaws of electoral systems with universal suffrage best of all. it is lukashenka who knows because it was them that, thank god, he successfully used in ninety-four and took power, and now, solving the problems of today, the president is still thinking about how the same trick, but not for the sake of the country, like lukashenka in ninety-four, but just for myself from some other country some rogue or rogue did not turn, so that later it would not be excruciatingly painful for the aimlessly lived years. and while the strategy is busy, the head of state. all the rest are obliged to conscientiously fulfill their direct duties, i will say briefly if you do not

want to fight with weapons. fight in the field at the factory, and at the factory, our war does not go through ukraine. but through the economy, through us, at that meeting a lot was said about the moratorium on price increases, which has already ended and in which there was no talk of a total forever. there was no question of price freezes. if someone did not hear this speech, it was that they had accumulated so much fat. well, maybe that's so much, but he is this one, and you won't convince me that he doesn't exist. some people got scared, because you won’t create your fortune on prices anymore. in one of the previous programs, i spoke about the systemic and non-systemic decisions of the new chairmen of the district executive committees, if very briefly, when the city is not clean enough, there are two ways to eat

chaotically everyone in the name of the righteous revolution collect us saturdays look. it, of course, nobly beautiful and very ideologically, but wrong in essence. and there is another way to think over and create in the city such a system of restoring order by the forces of those services. who should be responsible for the cleanliness of the city, so that the townspeople go out in the morning, and the city is clean, like, on its own, without subbotniks without the name of the revolution, everyone is swept away and without everything else, the problem can be solved with heroic super-efforts, but the task of the manager is not to be a hero, but to create a system, in which any problem will be solved automatically and in an understandable way. rules, and then the problem will cease to appear at all. mass monitoring of prices, of course, looks very beautiful , selfless and patriotic, but it is not systemic. today, we don’t control this process at all, the deputies of the trade unions walk around in a crowd and the

state control committee went in crowds in crowds, no need, crowds go, we need to work out a system. and so far , those who were supposed to develop a system, because these are their immediate duties, prescribed, including in the job descriptions of managers, the system is not worked out by lukashenka and was forced to make a temporary non-systemic decision to ban price increases. that's all. with regards to the entire belarusian people's assembly, there was another fragment from the president's speech, which is very important, whether we are ready to work according to the new rules. are there enough measures to counteract attempts to disrupt the elections? and it’s not just getting ready to go out and wave in short skirts with flowers, you know what is good about the parallel work of journalists on the author’s program and in the presidential field so that for a subjective better understanding

of the president's theses. there is always the opportunity to ask him personally what i actually used on friday at the training ground in the brest region after yesterday's meeting in the palace of independence. the fact that almost such a pseudo-analyst, almost lukashenka will personally appoint all the members, evs, this, of course, is ridiculous, but subjectively there is some sound grain in this there is an assumption, because the entire belarusian people's assembly has a meeting. this is a necessary sound idea, but the times are difficult and subjective part of the belarusian society to redistribution. powers or even more to change the president right now in mind, the events are completely unprepared, because there is a war near us

. we promised people that there would be a redistribution and the question would be what to do? what to do, you already decided in a referendum everything that is written in the constitution will be so and you will not see there that lukashenka will appoint something. you will not see this there. all the belarusian people's assembly is the highest body of representative power, everything will be carried out exclusively by election, with the exception of people who will occupy places there ex officio. well, let's say the incumbent president is the prime minister, deputies of parliament, senators, who have already been elected by the people. but you will see this, this is a common lie and the tripology will appoint everyone about 1,000 people are enough for president lukashenka, whom he coordinates and appoints. i added why a pseudo-analyst, like

lukashenka, creates a vns to keep power , this is nonsense, and now he will personally appoint the members of the assembly. so the president. now without vns, he personally appoints many of his people, why should he also appoint everyone else there, which prevents him from leaving everything as it is now to retain power. also, if it will be an elected body directly in the national assembly, but still lukashenka will be the president power, in fact, will be with him. but after that. this is a completely different conversation. and the most important thing from the question and answer is that it is still the centralization or decentralization of power right now. how much does centralization cost? igor has no decentralization and cannot be, as the president was the head of state, he will remain the people will elect the president. i would probably be more of a supporter of the chinese version. i congratulated my friend comrade to sit on the victory well done uh, the fight was. god forbid, but

the professionals decided to be or not to be and decided secretly decided. perhaps we should have come to this, but i, uh, i am a supporter of this, but i felt and understood, i was mistaken, i was not mistaken, that, well, our people are not yet ready to give their right to someone even trusted , uh, persons vns, avoid the president. well, it seems to me that there is no need to rush here. it can already, under the second president of the third, you will resolve this issue so that they do not again accuse me of doing this for myself again. everything will be more democratic than ever. remember democratically, than ever. i have some guesses what the president had in mind, but for now i’ll keep my thoughts to myself. let’s talk better about the military component of the friday trip of the head of state, where alexander lukashenko

got acquainted with domestic novelties of drones and means of suppressing enemy unmanned forces. with regard to everything that we have going on. this is the deployment of a joint allied grouping and the regime to one of the meeting, the training grounds and everything that some call the military. i will repeat. i understand very well and categorically support those who i am for world peace. i am also behind both hands, but i also understand that world peace has never been like this, and there never will be for the last six months, the words we hear. i am for world peace. this is not the full truth, more honestly - this phrase sounds. i am for peace at home, or i am for peace near my home, or i am for peace in the whole world, otherwise somehow the world has not become close to me, let's take a cut-off personally. the beginning of my work is autumn, the fourteenth in eight years there was certainly no peace in the world . he was just far away from us, syria afghanistan africa latin america and so on. well, the thesis, i was for peace in the whole world, was not

relevant with us, because we had peace near us. why globalization is populism, everyone cares only about their own interests and in general, it's normal. i am also for world peace, but if war is inevitable, but there are options, where will the hegemons shoot, ukraine near us, taiwan syria or honduras with all due respect to the taiwanese with the syrians or honduras? i'd rather have the hegemons shoot on their territory. they are near mine. motherland a week ago, the president met with the philosopher alexander dugin. it seems to me that it makes little sense to split up their conversation into these fragments. it needs to be heard and appreciated in its entirety. although not the whole conversation. i even got into the public space, but a couple of fragments still deserve special attention, for example, a few weeks ago, one of the fugitives, who was so coincidentally, then quickly beaten in poland, tried to get me to talk about the national idea. i replied. here, just like

i think that all their talk about the national idea. it was the pain of its transfusion from empty to empty. it's just that these conversations, apparently, are financed by someone, but i'm not going to take part in this. i have no idea what the national idea of ​​belarus is, i really just don’t understand why it must be. as for me, the basis of the national idea of ​​any country, even belarus, even russia, even in germany, even god forgive me, in the usa there should be common sense and logic. what the hell is the national idea of ​​france? what is their national the idea is all blah blah. but ideology is different. they talked about state ideology, ideology in general, and that we don’t have it in russia, all the more so. this is also true. i was offered a sea of ​​ideas that, uh, well, with the proposal to the state, i answered them all, because they do not fall on the heart

of a person. what kind of idea that cannot master the masses, as the classic said and does not fall on the heart, but this is not an idea and it cannot be a state idea, but so far nothing has been rummaged. unfortunately, i kept counting that tactically our ideology is described in one simple word justice i want to live in a country where it will be fair and honest , and in the same way it will be fair and honest if i not only want, but also do something for this, because if they do it alone , and the result of the investment of forces a fair honest world will be distributed evenly between everyone and those who have invested efforts and those. who is just tel, then this will be unfair and dishonest, but at the same time you can say whatever and however you like, as much as we have the strength. how much opposition from this liberal elite, we call it the sixth column, there is a fifth column that rages in the streets, says, down with

putin, down with lukashenka, down with russia well, down with everything. and there is a sixth column. here we are faced with him to a much greater extent, their platform is the same as that of the fifth absolutely pro-western continuation of liberal reforms. the collapse of our state, but they do not say down with putin and says, long live putin long live putin, my support is excellent. everything is good, but they do same. this is the sixth column - this is the worst. you know how easy it is to call those whom dugin wrote down in the sixth column. pseudo-patriots, the democratic leader makes the most popular decision, and the leader of truth makes the most correct one. and if the leader understands that the decision is popular with the audience. wrong, he must, at any cost, make an unpopular, but right decision, despite the resistance of the wrong part of the audience. understand my words as you please, but only there would be no war in belarus now and

no, only one option. at first my name is igor tour. it was my propaganda , sewing complete harmony with myself in the vacuole light. we are in the most beautiful place, the belarusian woodlands. the places here are unique not only by nature, but also by the gifts of nature, people come here from the drill. i, like blueberries , see such cranberries, a childhood home, the desire to have my own home, and my whole, as it were, this conscious adult life , i certainly have for my children. low bows

, people who report to visit, share a step, there were no hens, no goats, and now built sheds started farming. and now we are like real villagers. my whole life came with bees. i listen love. they understand me, although the sludge is also an approach to have an individual policy on belarus 204 tv channel. here it is impossible to write a script in one of the programs, the team that scored only one point won, but masterfully set up the opposing team. don't look for justice here. she is not here, because you don’t know how the participants will answer and when the tower falls, what kind of tulip flower is this? you have time to think, i don't

tulip tulip polar star. no, ask, i say, in order to win it is desirable to have not only knowledge, but also spatial thinking. who is the author of the answers. we mentally feel each other mentally we feel each other, how does the advertising slogan sound, watch the intellectual entertainment project tower on our tv channel. would you like to spend one day at the mother and child center, our center stands at the origins of the life and health of our children, to see with your own eyes how doctors help children at the initial stage of their lives. generally, the operation itself was seen, although in principle, of medium severity, but at a minus kilogram, at least there is such a green eye. here i am talking now. yes, and it says in green it means in terms of decibels. here is our conversation is quite acceptable. he

is also a small child 800. or maybe you would like to know more about such a difficult and very important profession as a teacher, my job. and educate your children danila show me how to hold a pencil. tasya , show me, she's holding a pencil. ah. this is your second life, your family, where there are no days off holidays. and where you have no right to make a mistake in the project one day, we will introduce you to the unique people of our country, watch on belarus 24 tv channel.

hello live news with you in the studio lyudmila kozak, watch in this evening edition transshipment of their cargo through the caspian sea in the government delegation is visiting the russian region.