good evening good evening, you lived in brussels for 8 years. why didn't the number eight become infinity, and why didn't you get seduced by european life, and did you return? i really lived for almost 8 years in total, based on the results of two long-term business trips. in fact, not everything in brussels is measured by comfort. and when you are

in the public service in the diplomatic service. this is no exception. a lot of things are considered for you in a different way - this is when you are trying to really change something to bring to the common good. that is why, probably, the motivation of those people who go to public service. she is not just stuffing her pocket of earning some money, but still some. uh, understanding your contribution to the common cause in the overall success and service imposes a number of restrictions, you also need to understand this, we are all, for example, bearers of secrets, diplomats, yes, that is, you know the proverb there, the less you know, the better you sleep, so actually at the beginning. especially it presses, uh, seriously enough on the head, but this is one moment the second moment of course this is what there are such concepts as duty, and love for the motherland and for me a person who is born. uh, in the mid-seventies - these are not empty concepts. they are filled with very serious content,

first of all, in the sense that i am not just me, this is not just an act of love of my parents, then of my own development. but i have a lot. we have a lot of society. there is a lot of state contribution to the fact that i became like this, yes, that is, i understand perfectly well that without millions of dead. i wouldn't was not in my parents, without that leap in development that my ancestors made in the second and third quarters of the 20th century. my parents would not have received higher education 20 years after the most empty war. they received higher education. they then gave it to me and a simple boy from the vitebsk outskirts was able to become a diplomat. finish the faculty of law of the belarusian state university, uh, and. eh, so i'm deeply convinced that this is understanding. e for a long time this society is a state this

collective image of the motherland. for me to betray to call the homeland e to in a row, all the more to harm discord, in fact it is worse than killing a person. i really did not want to answer your pretentious question, but it turned out as it is. you have no idea how important it is for me to hear this. i'm not kidding. let's have a little more sheep's values ​​then. you are not only a specialist in human rights, but you yourself have become a highly associated person in this area. yes. here is one phrase that human rights are a utopia; it tore the consciousness of many rights, and you personally consider yourself free man. but this is a very serious question. let me answer in parts, firstly, regarding the concept of human rights, belarus

has never denied the value of this concept unconditionally. this is the basis of the rule of law state , the concept of human rights determines the status of an individual person, the status of a citizen in his relations, both with another citizen and with the state. uh, the very concept of human rights is designed to protect a person from an administrative error from a judicial error from some kind of arbitrariness of officials, so it is very important to understand what i'm trying to convey here internally is that the work of human rights is to protect human rights to promote human rights. this is a daily work, in fact, of all our state bodies and authorities and the president and government and parliament and law enforcement agencies. they are all designed to provide us with you each individual person. the toolkit for us to feel protected in society is the basis of our equality with you

, whether in court or within the framework of administrative procedures, and must be measured in court. not the size, the purses of impossibility, the officials of a particular person or, uh, an administrative uh unit, but deeds and deeds, so i would very much like to sharpen this point here specifically in relation to. from what you mentioned that the concept of human rights is utopia i meant and i want to further explain here that utopia is, uh, the possibility of finding some criterion that equalizes all approaches to the subject of human rights at the international level. this is very important to understand, because in fact each society is the guarantor of a specific country. the secret state is the guarantor of our human rights and human rights cannot exist without duties. and this is the relationship of human rights and duties, then the

ratio of the common good and individual rights, the ratio or understanding of social justice, which underlies this distribution yes of the common good and individual rights. it is characteristic of every society, individually through the ages. new through the years crystallized and has an absolutely individual context for all states for all countries precisely in this. eh, the meaning is that the achievement of a certain single criterion. it is impossible to have an ideal. it is on paper, for example, the universal declaration of human rights, but no state can say that it has fulfilled it 100%. well, i want to finish the famous phrase. and who are the judges, so, as it were, in my opinion. er, the thesis that we need to shift the focus to work on human rights in the state, we ourselves should do it. this is very uh, clear clear message. we are doing this in e, in, and

we are absolutely responsible for the implementation of such an instrument as the universal periodic review. e human rights under this by promchak. this is our voluntary commitment. we carry it out, receive recommendations, which are considered later and in accordance with our own understanding of these processes. internal development external development we take certain actions. i wanted to say how free i am. now questions. yes, now since the question is very complex, you you know, you can be free, probably, managing your own life within the framework of those rights that you have only with full, uh, understanding and awareness of your own responsibility and your own duties to the family to society to the state to any fellow citizens of my country, while these duties

and there should be no responsibility. restrictions that you perceive as unfair that is, this harmony within you regarding the fact that you have rights, there are duties, that they are harmonious and it suits you and there is your freedom, both internal and external, and in this sense, for example, i consider myself a free person in a particular society in a particular state with specific legal norms with a specific understanding of public consensus as to what is bad. what is good, we can argue and many will say that that's where the usa and switzerland freedom is more free. that is, there is less state. this is the main point. yes, accordingly, there is a feeling that, for example, there is more freedom in politics. what is more freedom in the right to walk down the street and shout down with the president? well, let's look at the context, and the context is quite simple. yes, they walk down the street shouting

down with the president, each state determines for itself how much this particular act carries, some risks or challenges for stability and for the development of society. let's look at brussels or washington or other countries in the west, these countries can exist without a president. these countries can exist without a government. we know the period when 2 years federal the belgian government was not formed, and nothing has changed there. for 150-200 years, it has already been established for them that the main elections, including in geopolitics. in economic policy, there has long been a consensus at the level of the elite at the level of the people, and they exist in this situation with a completely different content. here, look good. you say that there is less state than personal freedom, but the pandemic showed it to be completely opposite, it turned out that we had

much more freedom in this regard at that time demonstrated. yes, that is, the state did not dominate the personality as much as it was in the west, and moreover, quite specifically, we are the only thing that is somewhere with sweden. we reached a consensus in this regard. no, the point is that in fact, all these spheres, they are very mobile. yes, i say again, that is, uh, if you take, uh, a specific topic, that means public freedom in the field of a pandemic, yes, that is, yes, in the west, the path was chosen to vaccinate everyone there, for example, in european countries in most countries, that is, in this sense, as if freedom were not enough, because if you do not go this way, well, all your freedom was that you stay at home and without disturbing anyone you could not go to restaurants. yes, i couldn't go out. uh, on the street and so on, yes, but if you go back, here's to the topic that i touched on the possibilities. uh, belarus to act by the same methods. yes

, how would it happen in the west? i beg to differ with the apologists. this is more freedom at the current stage there, because we have you have different challenges. yeah, every walk down the street of our protesters is primarily about choice. from internal development and immediately after that , the question of the geopolitical orientation of our country immediately arises. therefore, at this stage, in my opinion, our thesis is that we need a strong state. absolutely justified for absolutely objective reasons, the question is whether the role of the state in belarus will evolve, i am sure that of course it will, but it will evolve in direct proportion growth. here is this public consciousness of ours, our protesters who disagree about their own responsibility to all citizens to society as a whole. they only

want to be heard in front of their like-minded people. well , well, yuryevich, maybe, after all, there are problems in the definition, as they say, did the details? yes , the opposition is very fond of the word will. in your opinion, what is the difference between will, freedom, well, and sovereignty, but freedom is definitely not lawlessness . essentially, the concept of freedom entered the discourse. all-russian east slavic western means schools and uh means the ability to independently exercise certain rights. yes, it means to bear the responsibility will. this word, which we once discussed with one of my russian colleagues, the ambassador of the russian federation, does not, in our opinion, have a direct translation in english with him. hmm, why? because

will is something wild, it's something siberian , it's something so taiga, yes, where there are no boundaries for the desire and actions of a person, and when a person lives e in society, well, you and i can ask ourselves a question. can a person be in society, is it a well-known philosophical can he go free in society? can he be free from society? where is the line where your freedom ends , the freedom of another person begins, respectively. eh, will will - this is this chaos. yes, especially. eh, such an analogy came to something, here the russian field and volya even rhyme and the freemen. yes, free will - in my opinion, these are very close concepts, yes, that is semantic this is what comes out of this. freedom is a very clear understanding of boundaries. yes , the fact that you can own your rights and

the obligations arising from this. will is the ideal. that is, you are in your soul in your heart, maybe, uh, free, yes, that is, absolutely. uh, because you dream of doing something incredible. it is actually, when you enter, so you get up in the morning and go to shave, you do it, because there are certain restrictions, and again i say. yes, you may not shave, but you understand what it is in some way will have an effect on your colleagues there, on the image of your television company and sovereignty - this is, strictly speaking, this is the freedom of the state. yes , well, if you take it more conceptually, these are the abilities of a particular state , through state institutions, to exercise the rule of power in specific territories, regardless of others. again, this is an ideal situation, because you and i know that

there are about 200 recognized unrecognized states on the planet. yes. that is, how would it be great hostel. here i live in the house. we have 180 apartments. here are partnerships where never once in 20 years has the assembly fully met, which is called upon to decide. so everything at home is the same. try to negotiate among 180 states. we agree. we have contracts. and these treaties create for us not only rights, that we should live here wonderfully there and all that, and use it, create duties, and precisely these duties. determine the freedom of action of a state on external arena and not only in the external arena. yes , because our obligations are on economic issues. here they determine our actions, including in the economy. let's go. let's touch on the topic of freemen of other states in relation to belarus of freemen. and let's just say how the packages of sanctions that have been adopted

against belarus. they generally fit into the concept of sovereignty, freedom and the concept of human rights sanctions, in fact, this is chaos. yes, this is a more valuable state-wide range of state-level sanctions. this is enough a banal tool over the past 20 years, and not just over the past 20 years, but now it's just that. almost everywhere and everything on the part of those states that believe that they can use their dominant economic position. paradoxically, the presence of nuclear weapons has brought us to this situation. yes, that is, nuclear deterrence made it impossible. uh, classic wars between large countries, instead there are economic sanctions, yes, which are quite understandable why they are found. that is, it is and none are selective. they are not smart, they are not

aimed at improving our rights or specific people in belarus, yes, that is, this is pressure on the government on the authorities in order to achieve some social protests against the backdrop of a deteriorating standard of living and, accordingly, to further undermine e the situation if it is shattered and make a speech to change the government, so there are no illusions. no. the west seeks only its own interests. e. e strategic geopolitical zone extensions influence, but to further move moscow's zone of influence away from them. eh, everything. everything is quite simple, that is, this is the term military carpet bombing, but it can already be used, then in this sense, if you say that this is a replacement for military actions that are impossible for actually economic

actions here, of course, partially. we see that war is still possible. and, in fact, it is. military conflicts have occurred throughout the existence of the united nations at various points between, among other things, two superpowers for years while the soviet union existed as if in korea as if in vietnam as in other places and afghanistan and so on, the same thing is happening in ukraine now 16 teams of the elite and they are all unique welcome to the game in the favorites only you are given the opportunity to complete the game and collect your hero matrix, who will take the main prize and give odds to the fireman. of these, it

will become better, they will show not in words, but in deeds, who are the heroes of our time and i have strong hands and a strong character. i don't stand a chance for anyone. i want to try yourself in fire rescue sports, because it is noble and interesting, watch the heroes on our tv channel in the sports and entertainment show, we continue to discover new cities and neighborhoods from this hill. orsha begins its report on its almost thousand-year history, breathtaking views and amazing energy, we show the author's routes and the most mysterious places, there really are numerous facts of healing the afflicted, direct confirmation of the main attractions and unique architectural monuments. monuments

lenin in the city is somewhat at least four, there is even such a riddle . would you like to spend one day at the mother and child center, our center stands at the origins of the life and health of our children, to see with your own eyes how doctors help children at the initial stage of their lives. in general, the operation itself saw, although in principle, of medium severity, but minus a kilogram, at least there is, you see such a little green eye. here i am talking now. yes, and it says in green it means in terms of decibels. you've found the conspiracy quite acceptable here. he is also a small child, a small scale 800. or maybe you would like to learn more about such a difficult and very important profession as a teacher. my

job is to teach and educate your children, show me, i hold a pencil. tasya show me how to hold a pencil. and this is your second life, your family, where there are no holidays. and where you have no right to make a mistake in the project one day, we will introduce you to the unique people of our country watch on belarus 24 tv channel. well , you held the post of deputy after breda at nato and, yes, the head of the international organization of the un system, yes, i headed the political body and the governing bodies of the united nations economic commission for europe well. here i would like to dwell a little on these organizations. yes , in more detail, let's start the dream a month ago at the seventy-

seventh session of the un assembly, uh, vladimir, your leader, spoke. yes, and he stated, uh, the gap between the current he and the rapidly growing diversity peace, that is, the loss of neutrality. and equality party, let's get straight. do we need such a united nations that today is increasingly dividing nations. maybe it has already taken the path of the league of nations, and it needs to be transformed, to put it mildly, and organized, right? you know, i will answer, right now i will say to your question that in my opinion. it is impossible to reform the un without reforming international relations. isn't this the same thing. they are absolutely not the same thing, because the united nations is just a reflection. yes, that is, as it were, the

status and level of relations between states, uh, in this large hostel, and the whole opinion is that it can and should resolve all issues by states. this is absolutely wrong opinion. it is a platform platform structure that is ideally designed to serve as a place of collaboration. the first is the simplest thing that we have, otherwise today it is an opportunity for the same minister or the president of the republic of belarus to come to stand on the podium and tell the whole world everyone who wants us hear. all that he thinks about the international situation or on a specific problem. well, let's agree that the fact that our political leaders will speak on belarusian television is far from everyone, and the political leaders of other countries heard this, the majority did not hear such a platform, that is, in this platform. yes, this is a

platform. well then, maybe a bit of a non- diplomatic question. yes, the special representative, he is from the united states in a blue eye declares that russian soldiers are given viagra so that they raped in ukraine, and women were raped, men and children of everyone, anyone, right away, they arise in my head. this is a flashback, but in the twentieth year and that's it. the same theme of violence sexual violence these batons in uh, condoms and so on. yes, i remember your interview with the french media yes, where you were already forced to fight off the topic of violence. sex shame fear yes words with the letter c they stand apart in advertising and marketing they are not used. here is whose submission at the un rostrum begins this terminology and such primitive manipulative actions. well, whoever hurts is talking about that

, this is the first thing that comes to mind, but if you answer seriously, then of course, this is a method of specific propaganda and is aimed at ensuring that there is a fashionable word now. yes, that is, dehumanization, there is the demonization of opponents, in fact. this is a very clear psychological technique when you hate a person, when you consider him a moral monster, it is easier to destroy him. and it's a tool that a special representative does. he e once again proves e, the theses that a wrote in his letter. our minister of foreign affairs addressed his colleagues right on the eve of the session of the un general assembly , where he outlined several problematic points and two main points. this is what he is actually doing now, and the role of the mouthpiece of the west and nato, yes,

that is, well, let's use the platform, yes, the current state. uh, it means that the influence of the west on the composition of the united nations has been brought to such a situation. uh what do most countries prefer uh? support the us or the west, not only in relation to russia for any questions. uh-huh, unfortunately, if they don't support them, then they simply abstain, that is, there are mechanisms that allow you not to express your position. and thanks to these mechanisms, if someone had set themselves the task of passing a resolution in the un today that the republic of belarus would be called a locomotive of the planet, the task would have been. that is, they would spend there, so we are very adequately aware of the added value of our participation in the un. and we are absolutely adequately aware of the practical value that we can derive. that is it

apart from the policy of your information. this is the first main point, yes, which we actively use, but the second point is very practical things. yes, that is, it is very wide. is it a network of special funds program institutions that help countries in development. this is the un development program and the un children's fund and the same un economic commission for europe and the world intellectual property organization, a number of others, and organizations including the same world health organization, which, according to has done a lot to the coronavirus, so that in the end, after all, the consolidation of the international community went in such a constructive way, yes, that is, and, uh, belarus actively involved. this is an experience. this is the experience of all these structures. they were created for what? yes? in order to cooperate in order to exchange best practices there. this work is

ongoing. we, as a country, use this to bring the best practices and methodologies, including managerial yes, but this is a method of excellence. this is one of the tools for improvement. he does not build hospitals and schools in belarus with our system. we've been through this for a long time, but he helps us tune our system well, three letters we've discussed. now let's discuss four letters nato is no secret that today is at our borders. well, they are increasingly accumulating their military contingents. yes, i don’t want to draw an analogy, but i remember well how diplomacy works, including the day before great patriotic war when this also happened. yes, there was a molotov-ribbentrop pact and its task was. if the school memory does not change. yes , all the same, precisely in order to

delay the war as much as possible and to minimize the possibility as much as possible. right now, this is the beginning of it. so i understand that the assessment of molotov’s personality changed at different times, but from laudatory conjectures, but today, what can our diplomacy offer today, that is, in fact, your department for minimizing the possibility of a military confrontation. but here i want to point out. the triad of our approaches, using folklore hmm, and if you don't want to feed someone else's soldier, then feed your own. and if you want peace, then get ready for war, and the third one who comes to us with a sword will mark and die, so in fact there are several aspects of the work of

diplomacy in this area, the first and unconditional is strengthening our defense capability. to do this, there are tools and a union state, our military-political alliance, a joint military the doctrine of the state of the union state of belarus of russia for this, there is an organization of a collective security treaty, which, with all the nuances, has proved its viability in kazakhstan and is now actively working on the situation in the armenian region of the azerbaijani border. and i think that this organization will continue to grow in the foreseeable future. we will see serious steps in this direction, belarus will chair this organization in 2023. and we plan to seriously work to ensure that this structure additionally actively contributed to our defense capability and security, in addition to.

strengthening our own defense capability with you. naturally, we are talking about confidence-building measures with our neighbors. it is difficult to talk about confidence-building measures now with some of our neighbors, but nevertheless they exist and we are implementing them both within the framework of the osce and within the framework of other international agreements. we are transparent. we invite both our partners and our partners in quotation marks to the exercise, a and we continue all the proper diplomatic work in international global forms and in the convention on disarmament and within the framework of the general assembly, where belarus is the traditional author. e resolution of his opposition to the development of new species. eh, a weapon of mass destruction, that's all, this is our image, therefore, when we talked for many years that belarus is ah, it is a regional security provider. in my opinion. this is an absolutely

responsible position. we continue to lead ourselves as well. now, if we imagine, purely hypothetically, that we would offer our country to nato as partner. that's right. we are ready to enter tomorrow. how quickly all claims and accusations of violating rights and freedoms in belarus would disappear, here are the clichés of the last dictatorship of europe well, and other tinsel that surrounds us now for many years, how quickly it would go away in your opinion, if we imagine the twentieth year, yes and imagine that the protests won. here we have already discussed with you what, in my opinion, is the result. uh, our country would naturally choose this, the liberal democratic path of development and, accordingly, we would have made a geopolitical u-turn with you. well , yes, that is, moreover, diametrically opposite neutral opposites. in my opinion. it would lead to the collapse of our colossal

socio-economic model. and in fact, it would lead to the loss of that state, as we understand it in its current form, because to destroy the ties that we have been building with russia for 30 years and be at a level many times lower than the situation in ukraine in 2014, because that ukraine's ties with russia were at that time significantly less intense to lose the premium market to lose, and lending opportunities mutual interaction. e with russia to lose that level of trust and, accordingly, energy prices. this is a huge huge loss. it would be a disaster for you and me when the state and for the majority of the inhabitants of this country. so what do you really want to emphasize? imagine now

what we will say tomorrow. accept us and they will accept us, well, they will most likely accept what remains of us. yes, but they will be happy. yes but conceptually, i want to say that the west, uh, lives peacefully and exists with a number of countries where well, not weekly, but very regularly, they cut off heads, where the word is democracy. e, that is, not present, not that in the constitution a in general in the political discussion of these countries. it’s just that these states represent, e, a certain political or economic significance, as if for the united states as for the european union, therefore, of course, if at some stage we began to position ourselves as the fruit of e interests. uh, mean west then, i think that it would be very little for the state and our neighbors, including to remember some moments of our internal order in practice, belarus is the price for the west

in that we are the shortest and most equipped road, a straight line without mountains with 600 km of wonderful concrete between the western border belarus and the borders of the russian federation that is, this is an absolute clear geopolitical factor, and this space is the space that is the asset that the western elite is looking for in terms of promoting their interests to the east to weaken belarus means to weaken russia to weaken russia to weaken. belarus means weakening china, which is why the west has very clear, simple interests of its own here, which is why they supported and registered the 2020 protests. first. if the protests won, they

would have their own puppet government and a second one. the protests did not win, but they counted on the fact that these protests would seriously weaken our ability to withstand their impact and, accordingly, create a zone of turbulence for our russian allies. calculated miscalculated. it's good. here is e quiet and loud diplomacy. yes, the concept, in general, is known in one of the interviews. you used the first adjective in relation to our country. yes, we do not endlessly call on the carpet even those representatives of embassies, which it might not hurt to call on much more often. yes, we do not make loud statements about the violation of the rights of european citizens. even when, well, they are crippled by european lyceums, what you were talking about, yes, this is really it. in general, then today is the work of our diplomats and let's get straight.

how many active belarusian embassies are there now and how much. everything, this amount is reasonable. well in regards to quiet or loud diplomacy, huh? here, uh, there is a confusion of the concepts yes of everyday perception, what is diplomacy and diplomacy of practice, and e, it is clear that something quiet is embedded in the traditional such perception of the word diplomacy, something not public, some intimacy. there are methods of negotiations. uh, this is definitely a significant part of this work. and believe me, that it continues both here and abroad. e. well, that's why it's quiet, yes, it's to achieve, uh, that means the desired solutions, uh, by appropriate methods. yes, they take out of the hut, what is called, but also believe that we call on the carpet and not only call on the carpet. it's simple, of course, we

all watched the tass movie, and it's authorized to declare it, and there it's all here, yes, that is, well, that's it, it's somewhat different, that's not always, yes, and they don't always tell the press about it. yes, and a lot of things happen, but we know how to be loud when necessary. we are not looking for it we are in this sense, we adhere to the classical school, and we react when necessary we react quite seriously we react severely. uh, and caustic, you can evaluate in different ways, this or that style is a matter of adequacy in a particular situation. and therefore, of course, the current diplomacy has this element of politicization. uh, when press secretaries are forced to express themselves very, succinctly, let's call it that, or when from the un rostrum we have to call a spade a

spade very impartially. this is part of modern e-diplomacy. regarding the system that we now have in our foreign institutions, there are 70 of them, if memory serves me, we are represented in 57 countries. this means that three-quarters of these foreign institutions are located in states with which we are not just cooperating, with which we are cooperating, we are probably developing relations on an equal basis, therefore, from the point of view of the tasks of our diplomats. in these states, in fact, nothing has changed. this is a traditional task. uh, making friends in the political leadership of these countries, and for ensuring the conditions for solving our main economic task of our interest in increasing exports. that is, including for reorientation, these countries are unconditionally determined. that is, this is the creation of additional opportunities, if you want, and already to replace those opportunities that have fallen, which are closed to us

due to the fact that, well, not carpet. dosages thank god but the economic sanctions imposed by western countries and closed for us a number of traditional opportunities back 1/3. on this stage is very significantly reduced in terms of personnel , the main goals of work in western countries of our foreign institutions are consular functions, that is, it is to assist our citizens in the realization of their rights, and any, whether there, on a power of attorney, will be to receive a passport to assist in any difficult life situations. uh, and uh, of course, where there are opportunities to maintain economic interaction. believe interest. uh, business is not completely dead western business to our country. loss of multi-billion dollar turnover. with us

did not pass for them. imperceptibly and taking into account all the economic factors that await europe in the near future, especially given the current current friction with russia, yes. e. i think that western business understands what it has lost, and it understands that brussels will not have an endless opportunity to recoup the national government. them. the way out is the antics that they allow themselves, if modestly noted. e actions of the lithuanian government, how e antics they are considered comparable to the benefits of good-neighbourly cooperation with the state of 10 million e population, then well, this is their responsibility to the actual quite a bit. yes, now a topic

that is heard, which is being discussed, and then let's say what karpenko said, the chairman of the cec , among other things, he announced that voting at foreign polling stations will be abolished in the next elections. well, it caused a certain. it's a rush. we don’t have it abroad with ours in the first place, who fled, so how much is the belarusian know-ha and what role, especially in quantitatively, these very voices from abroad played? this is not belarusian know-how, there are a number of countries that, in the same way, do not create polling stations abroad from european countries, the family does not change memory - these are albania and montenegro and cyprus and turkey in such a far abroad, this is chile and a number of other countries . uh-huh . and there are a number of countries that allow

voting, but only for very select categories. there, for example, as a diplomat abroad, so this is by no means belarusian know-how and uh, we we simply proceed from, uh, an understanding of the challenges that we faced primarily as a result of the coronavirus, if we take the quantitative composition of those who voted, then this is not even a percentage of the electors. this is a percentage. uh, therefore, to the assertion that this could somehow affect the results of the republican vote. or there uh, local elections. uh, absolutely groundless, we will consider yes fluent arithmetic error. well, this is mine. that is, i did not think that this is absolutely not only your thesis. this is my deep conviction. if you remember, i he also spoke in geneva from the rostrum from all the figures, yes, which are supported on the internet. this

is actually, this is also quite a practical thing. e. this is the head of state, the government, parliament practically does not need the internet to communicate, but with voters with people. if we look at where our fugitive oppositionists exist. yes, they exist on the internet. you know this is the universe yes, that's why the numbers that support them there, which means they are supported, are their subscribers minus civil servants like me, who are interested in their means of discourses, and minus all underage tourists, who always show journalists the true support that they do not have. that is, at best , several tens of thousands of people, and certainly in our society in our state there is room for development for improvement, but there should not be a situation where a minority is some kind

of extreme minority that exists in this virtual enclave and imposes its own development agenda. this means that the majority, even if it is a silent majority, and we ourselves know that revolutions are made by a very small number of extremist people, 2,000 are enough to achieve a lot. actually. we ourselves must understand this danger very well and control this process. uh, precisely the development of these extremist movements. and i think that this is the work of the law enforcement system. she is going in the absolutely right direction last. unfortunately, the latter is about a philosophical question. with belarus from notes and bananas republic yes, that's what you said in an interview with the western. media 13 years ago. it seems to me that today you are more and more.