and behi festival some basic messages. this is about what the festival means for our country for every person and for an actor for directors. and uh. in the same way, music was born very quickly for me. tickets for the film festival sessions, leaf fall are already on sale. everything changes very quickly , time passes unnoticed minutes days. we never have enough time to stop and think about those who are waiting for us at this very moment it is worth remembering those without whom it will be so lonely on this earth to say, you know, i miss dads, exactly

now, without delay, you need to say, i'm here, i'm nearby. appreciate the time you spend with your loved ones. georgievich good evening good evening, you lived in brussels for 8 years why didn't the figure eight become infinity, and why didn't european life seduce you and you returned? i

really lived for almost 8 years in total, based on the results of two long-term business trips. in fact, not everything in brussels is measured by comfort. and when you are in the public service in the diplomatic service. this is no exception. so many things service is considered differently for you - this is when you are trying to really change something to bring in the common good. that is probably why the motivation of those people who go to public service. she is not just stuffing her pocket of earning some money, but still some. uh, understanding your contribution to the common cause in the common, common success and service imposes a number of restrictions, you also need to understand this, we are all, for example, bearers of secrets, diplomats, yes, that is, you know the proverbs there, the less you know, the better you sleep, so really at the beginning. this is especially pressing, uh, on the head quite seriously, but this is one moment the second moment definitely this is something that there are such concepts as

duty, and love for the motherland and for me a person who, uh, was born in the mid-seventies - these are not empty concepts . they are filled with very serious content, first of all, in the sense that i am not just me, this is not just an act of love of my parents, then of my own development. but i have a lot. we eat a lot society. there is a lot of state contribution to the fact that i became like this, yes, that is, i understand perfectly well that without millions of dead. i would not have been in my parents, without that leap in development that my ancestors made in the second and third quarters of the 20th century. my parents would not have received higher education 20 years after the most empty war. they received higher education. they then gave it to me and a simple boy from the vitebsk outskirts was able to become a diplomat. cum law school

of the belarusian state university, uh and uh, so i am deeply convinced that this is an understanding. uh, for a long time this society of the state is this collective image of the motherland. for me, to betray my homeland, to call e to in a row, all the more to harm discord, in fact it is worse than killing a person. i really did not want to answer your pretentious question, but it turned out as it is. you have no idea how important it is for me to hear this. i'm not kidding. let's have a little more sheep's values ​​then. you are not only an expert in human rights, but have themselves become highly associated personas in the field. yes here's one phrase that human rights - a utopia, she tore the minds of many truth, and you personally consider yourself a free man. well, this is a very serious

question. let me answer in parts, firstly, regarding the concept of human rights, belarus has never denied the value of this concept unconditionally. this is the basis of the rule of law, the concept of human rights determines the status of an individual person, the status of a citizen. a-a in his relations, both with another citizen and with the state. uh, the very concept of human rights is meant to protect a person from an administrative error from a judicial error from some kind of arbitrariness of officials, so it is very important to understand what i am trying to convey here within the country that human rights work is to protect human rights to promote human rights . this is a daily work, in fact, all our state bodies and authorities and the president and government and parliament and law enforcement organs. they are all designed to provide us with you each individual person. the toolkit

for us to feel protected in society is the basis of our equality with you , whether in court or within the framework of administrative procedures, and in court they should be compared. not the size, the purses of impossibility, the officials of a particular person or, uh, administrative, uh unit, but deeds and deeds, so i would very much like to sharpen this point here specifically in relation to. e of what you mentioned that the concept of human rights is utopia i meant and want to further explain here that utopia is, uh, the possibility of finding some criterion that equalizes all approaches to the subject of human rights at the international level. this is very important to understand, because in fact each society is the guarantor of a particular country.

a particular state is the guarantor of our human rights and human rights cannot exist without duties. and this is the relationship of human rights and duties, then the ratio of the common good and individual rights ratio or understanding of social justice, which underlies this distribution yes of the common good and individual rights. it is characteristic of every society, individually through the ages. through the years, the new has crystallized and has an absolutely individual context for all states for all countries precisely in this. eh, the meaning is that the achievement of a certain single criterion. it is impossible to have an ideal. it is on paper, for example, the universal declaration of human rights, but no state can say that it has fulfilled it is 100%, well, i want to end with the famous phrase, and who are the judges, so, as it were, in my opinion. er, the thesis that we need to

shift the focus to work on human rights in the state, we ourselves should do it. it's a very uh, clear message. we are doing this in e, in, and we are absolutely responsible for the implementation of such an instrument as the universal periodic review. e human rights within the framework of this human rights. this is our voluntary commitment. we carry it out, we receive recommendations, which are then considered and taken into account. with their own understanding of these processes. internal development external development we take certain actions. i wanted to say how free i am. now questions. yes, now, since the issue is very complex, you know you can be free, probably, managing your own life within the framework of those rights that you have only with full understanding and awareness of your own responsibility and

your own obligations to the family, to society, to the state, to any fellow citizens of my countries, while these responsibilities and there shouldn't be any responsibility. restrictions that you perceive as unfair that is, this is harmony within you regarding the fact that you have rights, there are duties, that they are harmonious and it suits you and there is your freedom, both internal and external, and in this sense i, for example, i consider myself a free person in a specific society in a specific state with specific ones. uh, legal norms with a specific understanding of the public consensus as to what is bad. what's happened well, we can argue and many will say that that's where the usa or switzerland freedom is more free. that is, there is less state. this is the main point. yes, accordingly, there is a feeling that, for example, in politics there is more freedom. what is more freedom in the

right to walk down the street and shout down with the president. well, let's look at the context, and the context is quite simple. yes, they walk down the street shouting down with the president, each state determines for itself how much this particular act is. that's it, here are some risks or challenges for stability for the development of society. let's look at brussels or washington or other countries in the west, these countries can exist without a president. these countries can exist without a government. we know periods when the federal government of belgium was not formed for 2 years, and nothing has changed there. for 150-200 years, it has already been established for them that the main elections, including in geopolitics in economic policy, there has long been a consensus at the level of the elite at the level of the people, and they exist in this situation with us completely different content. here, look good. you

say that there is less state than personal freedom, but the pandemic seemed to be completely opposite. it turned out that we had much more freedom in this regard during that period . yes, that is, the state did not dominate the individual as much as it was in the west, and moreover, quite specifically, we are the only thing that is somewhere with sweden. let's reach a consensus in this regard. no, the point is that, in fact, all these spheres are very mobile. yes, i say again, that is, uh, if to take, uh, a specific topic, that means, public freedom in the field of a pandemic, yes, that is, yes, in the west, the path was chosen for everyone to be vaccinated there, for example, in european countries in most countries, that is, in this sense, how would freedom be not enough, because if you do n't go that route, well, all your freedom was to stay at home and not disturb anyone. you couldn't go to restaurants, you couldn't go out. uh, on the street and so on, yes, but if you

go back, here's to the topic that i touched on the possibilities. uh, belarus act in the same way. yes, how would it happen in the west? i beg to differ with the apologists. there is more freedom than this at the current stage, because we have completely different challenges. yeah, every walk down the street of our protesters is primarily about choice. si internal development and immediately after this immediately raises the question of the geopolitical orientation of our country. therefore, at this stage, in my opinion, our thesis is that we need a strong state. absolutely justified for absolutely objective reasons, the question is whether the role of the state in belarus will evolve, i am sure that it will, of course, but it will evolve in direct proportion to growth. here is this public consciousness of ours, our

protesters who disagree about their own responsibility to all citizens to society as a whole. they only want to be heard in front of their like-minded people. well , well, yuryevich, maybe, after all, there are problems in the definition, the devil says the details. yes opposition loves the word will very much. in your opinion, what is the difference between will, freedom, well, and sovereignty, but freedom is for sure. it's not infinity. the main thing, as a matter of fact, the concept of freedom has entered the discourse. all-russian east slavic western means schools and means the ability to independently exercise certain rights. yes, it means to bear the responsibility will this word, which we once discussed with one of my russian

colleagues, the ambassador of the russian federation, does not, in our opinion, have a direct translation in english with him language hmm why because will is something wild is something siberian is something so taiga yes where there are no boundaries for the desire and actions of a person, and when a person lives, uh in society, but you and i can ask ourselves a question . can a person be in society, it is a well-known philosophical free in society. can he be free from society? where is the line where your freedom ends, the freedom of another person begins, respectively, uh will will - this is this lawlessness. yes, especially. uh, something came such an analogy, here the russian field and volya even rhyme and the freemen. yes, freemen, in

my opinion, these are very close concepts, yes, that is, they are semantic and it comes from this. freedom is a very clear understanding of boundaries. yes , the fact that you can own your rights and the obligations arising from this. will is the ideal. that is, you are in your soul in your heart, maybe, uh, free, yes, that is, absolutely. uh, because you dream of doing something incredible. it is in fact, when you enter, so in the morning you get up and go shave you do it, because there are certain restrictions and again i say. yes, you may not shave, but you understand that this will somehow have an effect on your colleagues there, on the image of your television company and sovereignty - this is actually the freedom of the state. yes , well, if you take it more conceptually, these are the abilities of a particular state , through state institutions, to exercise the

rule of power in specific territories, regardless of others. again, this is perfect. situation, because you and i know that there are about 200 recognized unrecognized states on the planet. yes. that is, how would it be such a big hostel. here i live in the house. we have 180 apartments m. that is, partnerships where the assembly has never fully met in 20 years, which is called upon to decide. so everything at home is the same. try to negotiate among 180 states. we agree. we have contracts. and these treaties create not only rights for us. we should live here wonderfully there and all this and to use it create duties and precisely these duties. they determine the freedom of action of this or that state in the external arena and not only in the external arena. yes, because our obligations are on economic issues. here they determine our actions, including in

the economy. let's go. let's touch on the topic of freemen of other states in relation to belarus of freemen. and let's just say to what extent the packages of sanctions that have been adopted against belarus do they generally fit into the concept sovereignty freedom and the concept of human rights sanctions, in fact, this is chaos. yes, this is a more valuable state-wide range of state -level sanctions. this is a rather banal tool over the past 20 years, and not just over the past 20 years, but now it's just like that. almost everywhere and all on the part of those states that believe that they can use their dominant economic position. paradoxically, the presence of nuclear weapons has brought us to this situation. yes, that is, nuclear deterrence made it impossible. uh, classic wars between large countries, instead there are

economic sanctions, yes, which are quite understandable why they are found. that is, it is and no electoral. they are not smart, they are not aimed at improving our rights or specific people in belarus, yes, that is, this is pressure on the government on the authorities in order to achieve some social protests against the backdrop of a deteriorating standard of living and , accordingly, to further undermine e situation if she cranky and carry on a speech shift government, so there are no illusions. no. the west seeks only its own interests. e. e strategic geopolitical expansions of the zone of influence, and further move the zone of influence of moscow away from them. eh, everything. everything is quite simple, that is, this is the term military carpet bombing, but

it can already be used, then in this sense, if you say that this is a replacement for military actions that are impossible for actually economic actions here, of course, partially. we see that war is still possible. and, in fact, it is. military conflicts took place throughout the existence of the united nations at different points between, among other things, the two superpowers for years while the soviet union existed, like in korea, like vietnam, like in other places and afghanistan and so on, the same thing is happening now in ukraine

unique econography and unusual architectural solution the shape of our dome is very unique. it is made of two domes in the form of a knight's helmet, interesting facts from art experts and on icons like iconography depict the most holy theotokos who does not compress the baby to her, but he hugs his mother by the neck. and, of course, in this touching tenderness, there are also tragic notes of the help of god's word, the healing power of ziran prayer, a visible holy image with bodily eyes. we ascend to the heavenly world with spiritual eyes, often through the holy icons, god gives people his help, routes through the prayerful and holy places of belarus and novogrudok and regions. and this all gives

us the opportunity to turn again to our history. without history. in principle, we cannot now, as a people, so it's great that we are returning to the origins of our nation. watch spiritual, educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. ether 24/7 is a project in which there is a place for a brief overview of important topics of the outgoing week. let's not forget about the unique rituals and original culture of belarus. in addition, we'll take a walk with our guides and learn a couple of unusual belarusian words. we will cut off pershag, bread, bread, cut off, and you and do not forget to gratefully appreciate the work of people who make bread - we raised it for you, we are

telling. most importantly, watch the broadcast 24/7 every friday night.