or for itself, all belarusian, all folk, it will be, uh, not someone's corporate interest. it will be interesting kind. how do you see it? well , firstly, it is very important for me that the whole belarusian people's assembly will be like this. the belarusian people's assembly has always said that it needs a stabilizer ; who could, in general, pull this stop and stop this train, which will strive somewhere into the abyss, if suddenly this happens, but you see, what unprecedented pressure on our country from various uh advantages, therefore it is very important that all these decisions will really be made, which are very important strategically important for our country, and this is a program of socio-economic development. and this is the concept of national security. etc. this will be accepted. that's how the whole world is. so it didn't work. so, uh, now the world needs not only stability, but also dynamics to fit in quickly in the process, that is, will it not turn into an ns into this, well

to the plant, this word is a balance, which, uh, will reduce, or rather, increase the time for making decisions on approval. and so on, that is, there will be no such overlays here. i hope that it will not be possible for him, toxic functions, he will determine the strategy, while tactics will still remain with the government for local authorities. it of course for this president. you see, dmitry, we, in this case, are no longer us, yes, but at one time we, as members of the constitutional commission, developed the provision for dividing everything belarusian national assembly. here uh. this was the result again. these are the wishes of the people, because the sixth all belarusian people's assembly in its operative part unanimously voted 2,500 delegates for giving this body a constitutional status. so, in general, on the dialogue platforms. people didn't mind. many welcomed the individual spoke out. here are fears similar to yours, but really in the provisions that are laid down in the functions of the entire belarusian people's assembly. uh, there is a

clear distinction with the functions of parliament government and heads of state. a number of powers of a strategic nature are transferred to him at one time, when the delyu of political reform appeared in the upper house of parliament, there were also doubts that this would slow down the decision-making process of the traitor, however. on the contrary, it gave them more balance. and uh, probably some higher degree of legal expertise. here, in this case, er, and political expertise. in this case, we are dealing with e, a similar solution, and i must say something else for us, this form is traditional. well, first of all. eh, these are really speech traditions, and secondly, eh, which existed in ancient e, forms of belarusian prototypes, probably, belarusian statehood. and secondly, uh, after all, we have always held all the belarusian people's meetings. they simply wore their decisions were of a public advisory nature. however, hmm was never ignored. here they approved the development program for five years

deserved reports, including the head of state. in this case, we created, probably, an additional tool for more effective management. of course. it's all in theory. the best criterion for testing theory is practice. uh, well, here is this set of bills, which will now be considered by the parliaments, all the belarusian people's assembly, civil society, and the electoral code for political parties. from my point of view, this is a political exoskeleton. not just a response to public requests, but variables about fairness, something that our colleagues talked about. this includes the implementation of the engagement strategy involvement, as opposed to strategy that's the elitism that we see in the west. we are implementing a strategy for involving people in political decision-making in the participation of political processes, with regard to details, if you answer questions in detail, will it be possible, that vns, in the composition, uh, that

will form, will it react so promptly to challenges, we do not know this no one now. he knows that we are going experimentally to modernize the optimization of our political system, but there will be constant the current presidium, which, in the event of any serious challenges, will, i hope, be able to respond promptly and adequately. therefore, this is our strength. well, thank you very much for participating in our program, we thank our guests, but we don’t say goodbye to the audience, the well-known russian publicist andrey fursov is in touch. so see you soon. we continue to keep in touch with us one of those thinkers who, a few years ago , saw the processes in their true light and warned the events of which we all became witnesses today. his speeches in the media and on internet sites are very popular. we are very glad to have another meeting with the historian publicist. andrey

fursov andrey ilyich hello, i will start with the main thing for many experts. today, the planning horizon rests on the threat of nuclear war nato right-wing audit of nuclear deterrence duda asks america to host an arsenal in poland zelensky demands preemptive strikes. russia warns of a dirty kiva bomb. the west is shrugging it off. here, as you see, will nuclear war come to a last world? well, i think that the chances of a nuclear world war, but they are not so great, but you should not pay attention to what duda zelensky says, these are all dwarfs, but political life. simply frivolous is frivolous people. it is important what we say and what hmm say our, so to speak, opponents, who until recently were called partners. and i think that, uh, enough mind on the

opposite side not to bring it up. uh, to a dangerous line and even here it's not that biden is not quite adequate, most likely, he suffers alzheimer's, besides him there are the military, and besides , there are masters who stand above them. nobody needs a nuclear war, and most likely, if people like zelensky go, they will try to do something. i think they should probably be pulled. although what we are entering has already entered the military era, and we entered back in syria but this is perfect. eh, absolutely absolutely right. but andrei ilyich is facing such a threat to the world. and i will clarify, not the western world, it is ready not just to observe the confrontation along the axis, russia nato but somehow you know to regroup, or something, because the west, through the mouth of a barrel, very clearly paints a gloomy picture for others - there is a wonderful garden. and that's the rest of the world. this is the jungle. well, in general, this

phrase is a barrel. well, firstly, she is russian, but she made me laugh. that's what's the matter in the fact that europe is now now the europeanization of ukraine by the cia ropa. it turns into the ukrainization of europe, it goes to the industrialization of europe, this am conflict in ukraine, it destroys the european middle class and destroys europe, this is from europe capitals are fleeing to united states i want to remind you that january 25th. uh, rent corporation. e, i prepared a document for the cia nsa and the hackers pulled it out and it is on the network this document is called, uh, january 25, 2022, and the weakening of america is the weakening of germany it is written in clear text that the situation in america is such that without material combined

resources. from the outside it cannot, and there are only two sources to endure. where to get these resources, china or the european union, but china is a subject of world politics, unlike the european union, which an inferior political body, and in addition, the chinese economy, but it is tied to the american one, therefore, and the conclusion was made, very very simple. i even i will even quote him. an increase in the flow of resources from europe to the united states can be expected if germany begins to experience a controlled economic crisis the pace of economic development of the european union almost without alternative depends on the state of the german economy, and then it says, and on whom does the german economy depend, it depends on russian resources and on french electricity the french, since they now have problems with achilles, they will be dealt with very simply . france has now become very dependent on the canadian australian. so to speak, fuel and

they can be put under pressure. and about uh german u german-russian economic ties, it was said, so i quote verbatim, the only suitable way to guarantee germany's refusal of russian energy. it is our limited action to involve both sides of the military conflict in ukraine. in this country will inevitably lead to response from russia, the russians will not only not be able to ignore the massive pressure of the ukrainian army on the unrecognized publics of donbass , but they can be declared an aggressor and impose a full package of sanctions against them, then putin can in response to impose counter-sanctions on energy supplies to europe, the damage caused to countries the eu will be comparable to the damage to the russian federation but for germany it will be even greater. here is one of the main reasons. uh, the mess that the anglo-saxons brewed on our border with the help of the ukronazis, so when barrel says that there is jungle around. well, maybe

jungle. but then europe is just a desert. my friends recently traveled through europe and say that they have never seen so many homeless people that they saw in france, austria and italy. well , maybe the main question, to which we were gradually approaching and i am sure that it is in one wording or another. it sounds not only there from the screens, but also when people get together trying to comprehend what is happening around now and the nuclear threat, and certainly heavy. dilemma, which is inevitable when fraternal peoples collide in a bloody struggle, led some to the utmost clarity. secondly, to horror. and here is the third one to such a deep inner experience , almost existential, almost so biblical, kama is coming, where are we going. and with that, of course. i'm sure, and everyone has a need to find answers to such a moral support, as we should live and see. the west hypnotizes with all its digital fear leading to

global zeroing, it is no longer even disguised. the culture of consumption on the other hand. here at the first check by the crisis. she sticks out at the seams. but there are those who live with the feeling that now everything will end, and we will live the old way, but will it be the old way. is it possible that it seems like they can think like that. here is andrey ilyich. i have a question like this. now, if you have an understanding of the image of the future from point a, we go to point b. what is point b supposed to be? it will not happen if we follow their scenario, but it should be, which we are still able to somehow form on one's own. well, there is, you know, in classical german philosophy there is the concept of due and existing, and one should not confuse them. well should what we would like is a socially just society. it is clear that, so to speak, in general, the legitimate image is understandable, but life is

arranged in a completely different way, and the moment that we are experiencing now is that the old world has broken. it's already broken for sure. and for many people. here, especially people of my generation and a little younger, who found the late soviet union with all the criticism of the late soviet union , it was a quiet life of confidence in the future . here is one of the features of the current life is that this confidence has become much less and you need to get used to it. in general, to say that the period of history that was after the end of world war ii and ended with the destruction of the soviet union, these 45 and 50 years. but it was a unique period. in history. it was a quiet life. eh, analogue. i see only two analogues. i see it after period after napoleonic in europe and er, the roman empire hmm in the

2nd century ad, such periods are very, very short. now we have entered a new period of breaking one system and the emergence of a new one. and this is a very hmm, so to speak, such a serious shock, and it requires two very simple simple things from people , for example, the will and the mind of the mind, in order to understand the situation and not panic and understand that, as before, there will be no more will to create to resist circumstances. and create on our space that we own north to create eurasia, the fraternal peoples of the slavic e, well, after all, other peoples who live on this territory are indigenous, but to create a society, well, the maximum possible social justice, in general, there is not a single 100% fair society , and any sociobiological anti-entropic form implies a hierarchy. and this

means a violation of social justice, but we know very well that in the same soviet union there was more social justice than in the capitalist edel, so here, based on of the period in which we live, uh, it should be about the fact that, uh, we must be ready for a very serious, but serious confrontation with the post-mortem west. he has a fire, but in this fire he is very dangerous, so here you need first of all internal. psychological mobilization and we need to live in such a way that later we would not be ashamed in front of our ancestors in front of our descendants. i often think about this: here is my father, who won the war and signed the reichstag. he left me and my generation. he left a powerful country that we leave our children. we screwed up. we, so to speak, uh, everything that has happened to us over the past 30 years,

we need to correct mistakes so that our children are not ashamed, so to speak, in front of us, so that they do not end up in an electronic concentration camp, so that they are not an object, but of this bet-fascism, you need to be prepared for the fact that we live in a strange world where the line between war and peace is generally erased now. and this is an incomprehensible situation. that is, in one in one part of the world, so to speak, there is a war, and somewhere nearby, somewhere , there is peace, and you need to be ready. you must be mobilized. that's when we are now talking about mobilization. for some reason, they only talk about military mobilization, no, military mobilization is a consequence, and the main thing is mobilization. psychological mobilization of the administrative apparatus of the civil sector and military mobilization. so to speak, in the end you cannot mobilize from the military if you are psychologically lax and believing that, well, another two or three months and that's it, and everything will return.