the ideal guarantors and procyons of the poskewidge lead the first empire away in its enterprise for an 8-year portion day, but moreover, it opens a school for the children of the workers for the workers themselves. i'll be equators, getbuya bottles. and yes, the sennya standing in the city dotted with architecture create their snotty ensemble with the factory. it was understood, then all this new passing is the same, well, it picks up on the pen covered. i kiss this white. well, that 's how it hurts mirskaya thawed, i'm here, but everything that you are so yourself, in fact, nothing like and otryllivalsya then for homework. yes, one of them is the remnants, none of it is well dissolve some arthur

residue code of the city of kazakhstan is nothing, and this one shook the scale of the city. well, at home everything is not in the great city, dashing, the alignments are now 152 dollars there, that after the revolution the factory is nationalized by the deer, not repaired and not dismantled. i went to the fern plant, and then i ran out of the yakfactory, and it blew food and the ambassador of the war, the products were led to the entire soviet union, our sheets were written by almost all the schoolchildren of the ussr, and until now the factory is one of the most expensive city ​​enterprises.

good evening, you lived in brussels for 8 years. why didn't this number eight become infinity and why didn't you get seduced by european life and did you return? i really lived for almost 8 years in total, based on the results of two long-term business trips. in fact, not everything in brussels is measured by comfort. and when you are in the

public service in the diplomatic service - this is no exception. a lot of things are considered for you in a different way - this is when you really try something change bring to the common good that is probably why the motivation of those people who go to public service. she is not just stuffing her pocket of earning some money, but still some. uh, understanding your contribution to the common cause in the common, common success and service imposes a number of restrictions, you also need to understand this, we are all, for example, bearers of secrets, diplomats, yes, that is, you know the proverbs there, the less you know, the better you sleep , therefore, in fact, at the beginning it is especially pressing, and it’s enough for the head seriously, but this is one moment the second moment certainly this is what there are such concepts as duty, and love for the motherland and for me a person who is born. uh, in the mid-seventies - these are

not empty concepts. they are filled with very serious content, first of all, in the sense that i am not just me, this is not just an act of love of my parents, then of my own development. but i have a lot. we have a lot of society. there is a lot of state contribution to the fact that i became like this, yes, that is, i am fine i understand that without millions of dead. i would not have been in my parents, without that leap in development that my ancestors made in the second and third quarters of the 20th century. my parents would be 20 years later. after the most wasteland war, they would not have received higher education. they received higher education. they then gave it to me and a simple boy from the vitebsk outskirts was able to become a diplomat. to graduate from the faculty of law, uh, the belarusian state university, uh and uh, so i am deeply convinced that this is an understanding.

e for a long time this society the state is a collective image of the motherland. for me to betray my homeland to call e to in a row, and even more so to harm discord, in fact it is worse than killing a person. i really did not want to answer pathetically to your question, but it turned out as it is. you have no idea how important it is for me to hear this. i'm not kidding. let's have a little more sheep's values ​​then. after all, you are not only a specialist in human rights, but you yourself have become highly associated persons in this field. yes. here is one phrase that human rights - this utopia, it tore the minds of many truth, and you personally consider yourself a free man. but this is a very serious question. let me answer in parts, firstly, regarding the concept of human

rights, belarus has never denied the value of this concept unconditionally. this is the basis of the rule of law, the concept of human rights determines the status of an individual person, the status of a citizen. ah, in his relations, both with another citizen and with the state. uh, the very concept of human rights is designed to protect a person from administrative error from judicial error from some arbitrariness of officials, so it 's very important to understand what i'm trying to convey here domestically is that human rights work is to protect human rights to promote human rights. this is a daily work, in fact, of all our state bodies and authorities and the president and government and parliament and law enforcement agencies. they are all designed to provide us with you each individual person. toolkit to make us feel in protected society is the basis of our

equality with you. be it in court, be it within the framework of administrative procedures, and in court should be measured, not the size of impossibility wallets, the officials of a particular person or, uh, an administrative uh unit, but deeds and deeds, so this moment i would very much like to sharpen here specifically in relation to. from what you mentioned that the concept of human rights is a utopia i meant and i want to clarify here further that utopia is a possibility finding a criterion. equalizing all approaches to the subject of human rights at the international level, this is very important to understand, because in fact every society is a guarantor, a specific country, a specific state is the guarantor of our human rights. and uh, human rights cannot exist without duty. uh-huh and this

is the relationship of human rights and duties, the ratio of the common good and individual rights, the ratio or understanding of social justice, which underlies this distribution yes of the common good and individual rights. it is characteristic of every society, individually through the ages. through the years, the new has crystallized and has an absolutely individual context for all states for all countries precisely in this. eh, the meaning is that the achievement of a certain single criterion. it is impossible to have an ideal he on paper. for example, the universal declaration of human rights, but not a single state can say that it has complied with it 100%, well, i want to end with a famous phrase, and who are the judges, so, as it were, in my opinion view, er the thesis that we need to shift the focus to work on human rights in the state, we ourselves should do it. it's a very uh, clear message. we are doing this in e, in, and

we are absolutely responsible for the implementation of such a tool as the universal periodic review. e human rights within the framework of this human rights. this is our voluntary commitment. we carry it out and receive recommendations, which are considered later and in accordance with our own understanding of these processes. internal development external development we take certain actions. i wanted to say how free i am. now questions. yes, now, since the issue is very complex, you know you can be free, probably, managing your own life within the framework of those rights that you have only with full ah, understanding and awareness of your own responsibility and your own duties to, family to society to the state to any fellow citizens of my country, while these

duties and responsibilities should not be. restrictions that you perceive as unfair that is, this is harmony within you regarding the fact that you have rights, there are duties, that they are harmonious and it suits you and there is your freedom, both internal and external, and in this sense i, for example, i consider myself a free person in a specific society in a specific state with specific legal norms with a specific understanding of public consensus as to what is bad. what is good we can argue and many will say that's where the usa and switzerland freedom is more free. that is, there is less state. this is the main point. yes, accordingly, there is a feeling that, for example, in politics there is more freedom. what is more freedom in the right to walk down the street and shout down with the president. well, let's look at the context, and the context is quite simple. yes, they

walk down the street shouting down with the president, each state determines for itself how much this particular act is. here are some risks or challenges for stability and for the development of society. let's look at whether brussels on washington or on other countries, the west these countries can exist without the president. these countries can exist without a government. we know periods when the federal government of belgium was not formed for 2 years, and nothing has changed there. for 150-200 years, it has already been established for them that the main elections, including in geopolitics. in economic policy, there has long been a consensus at the level of the elite at the level of the people, and they exist in this situation in a completely different context. here, look good. you say that less state more personal freedom but the pandemic showed it was completely opposite , it turned out that we had much

more freedom in this regard during that period. yes, that is, the state did not dominate the personality as much as it was in the west, and moreover, well, quite specifically, we are the only thing that is somewhere with sweden. let's reach a consensus in this regard. no, the point is that, in fact, all these spheres are very mobile. yes, i say again, that is, uh, if you take, uh, specific topic, it means public freedom in the field of a pandemic, yes, that is, yes, in the west, the path was chosen for everyone to be vaccinated there, for example, in european countries in most countries, that is, in this sense, as if freedom were not enough, because if you don't go that route, well, your whole freedom was to stay at home and without disturbing anyone you couldn't go to restaurants. yes , i couldn't go out. uh, to the street and so on, yes, but if you go back, here's the topic that i touched on the possibilities of, uh, belarus act in the same way. yes, how would

it happen in the west? i beg to differ with the apologists. there is more freedom than this at the current stage, because we have completely different challenges. yeah, every walk down the street of our protesters is primarily about choice. ty of internal development, and immediately after this , the question of the geopolitical orientation of our country immediately arises. therefore, at this stage, in my opinion, our thesis is that we need a strong state. absolutely justified for absolutely objective reasons, the question is whether the role of the state in belarus will evolve, i am sure that it will, of course, but it will evolve in direct proportion to growth. this is the public consciousness of ours, our protesters who disagree about their own responsibility to all citizens

to the society as a whole. they only want to be heard in front of their like-minded people. well , well, yuryevich, maybe, after all, there are problems in the definition, they say, the devil is the details. yes opposition loves the word will very much. in your opinion, what is the difference between will, freedom, well, and sovereignty, but freedom is for sure. it's not infinity. the main thing, as a matter of fact, the concept of freedom has entered the discourse. all-russian east slavic western means schools and e means the ability to independently exercise certain rights. yes, it means not all duties will this word, which we once discussed with one of my russian colleagues, the ambassador of the russian federation, does not, in our opinion, have it with him.