i remember this for sure, then try my luck in a team game and time has passed, and we are already ready. and you are already ready so, but if your answer turns out to be wrong, you will go and install, the third stone is fine, we understand. so this is the abduction of europe and most importantly, remember, you can soften your brain in different ways in which year the modern pentathlon competitions were included in the program of the olympic games olga 19 absolutely right, watch the intellectual show on belarus 24 tv channel. village name day to visit the owner of a real old village farmstead, when you show everyone is so surprised, they say, we know that at that time people were completely illiterate. and what

masterpieces did they make, how did they weave? there are a lot of exhibits here, which, well, they simply don’t remember why they and we didn’t know, why, together with nadezhda korsakov, we will refresh the priceless memories of childhood. and this is my favorite place. the most delicious memories of childhood. the sweetest is the chamber. our mother kept in the chamber jam, meat sausage, what was it like to find out which way to go? to fulfill the cherished dream of desire and to see the home of childhood, the desire to have my own home, did not leave me all my, as if this conscious adult life, of course, i would give to

my children. watch low poklonnaya on thursday on belarus 24 tv channel. i didn’t get together, it seems our dad really liked it. and get over to us to live why of all the men she chose vlad hair? eyes smile and not the reason that i live well. let's meet, we

need to talk. watch the tv series return my love from tuesday to friday on belarus 24 tv channel.

here it is impossible to write a script in one of the programs, the team won, which scored only one point for skillfully setting up the opposing team. don't look for justice here. it is not here, because you don’t know how the participants will answer

when it falls into the tower, what kind of flower it is, in order to win it is desirable to have not only knowledge, but also spatial thinking. mentally feel each other mentally feel each other friend, how does the advertising slogan sound, watch the tower intellectual entertainment project on our tv channel. it all starts with the origins and traditions, the memory of our ancestors, the preservation of the culture of belarusian rituals and crafts. but the world is changing. generations and views change, and

creativity does not stand still. when people realize the value of traditions and understand where to move on , art takes on new bright colors. good evening good evening, you lived in brussels for 8 years why didn’t the eight become infinity and why didn’t you get seduced european life and you are back? i

really lived for almost 8 years in total, following the results of two long-term business trips in brussels, in fact, not everything is measured by comfort. and when you are in the public service in the diplomatic service. this is no exception. a lot of things are considered differently for you. service is when you are trying to really change something and bring it to the common good. that is probably why the motivation of those people who go to public service. she's not just stuffing pocket of earning some money, but still some. uh, understanding your contribution to the common cause in the common, common success and service imposes a number of restrictions, you also need to understand this, we are all, for example, diplomats who are the bearers of secrets. yes, that is, you know the proverb there, the less you know, the better you sleep, so in fact at the beginning it especially presses, and it’s quite serious on the head, but this is one moment the second moment

definitely this is what there are such concepts as duty is love for the motherland and for me a person who born in the mid-seventies - these are not empty concepts. they are filled with very serious content, first of all, in the sense that i am not just me , this is not just an act of my beloved parents, then my own development. but i have a lot. we have a lot of society. there is a lot of state contribution to the fact that i became like this, yes, that is, i understand perfectly well that without millions of dead. i would not have been in my parents, without that leap in development that my ancestors made, in the second and third quarters of the 20th century. my parents would be 20 years later. after the most devastating war, they would not have received higher education. they received higher education. they then gave it to me and a simple boy from the vitebsk outskirts was able to become a diplomat.

from the faculty of law of the belarusian state university, uh, and. eh, so i'm deeply convinced that this is understanding. e for a long time this society is a state this collective image of the motherland. for me to betray the motherland call e to in a row. uh, even more so to harm discord, in fact it's worse, than to kill a man. i really did not want to answer pathetically to your question, but it turned out as it is. you have no idea how important it is for me to hear this. i'm not kidding. let's have a little more sheep's values ​​then. after all, you are not only a specialist in human rights, but you yourself have become highly associated persons in this field. yes here's one phrase that human rights - a utopia, she tore the minds of many truth, and you personally consider yourself a free man. well, this is a very serious

question. let me answer in parts, first, regarding the concept of human rights, belarus has never denied the value of this concept unconditionally. this is the basis of the rule of law, the concept of human rights determines the status of an individual person, the status of a citizen. ah, in his relations, both with another citizen and with the state. uh, the very concept of human rights is designed to protect a person from an administrative error from a judicial error from some kind of arbitrariness of officials, so it is very important to understand what i am trying to convey here inside the country then that the work of human rights is to protect human rights to promote human rights. this is a daily work, in fact, of all our state bodies and authorities and the president and government and parliament and law enforcement agencies. they are all designed to provide us with you

each individual person. the tools to make us feel protected in society is the basis of our equality with you. be that in court, be it within the framework of administrative procedures, and in court they must be measured, not the size of wallets impossibilities, officials of some particular person or, uh, administrative uh unit, but deeds and deeds, so i would very much like to sharpen this point here specifically in relation to. from what you mentioned that the concept of human rights is utopia i meant and i want to further explain here that utopia is, uh, the possibility of finding some criterion that equalizes all approaches to the subject of human rights at the international level. this is very important to understand, because in fact each society is the guarantor of a specific country.

a particular state is the guarantor of our human rights and human rights cannot exist without duties. and this is the relationship of human rights and duties, then the ratio of the common good and individual rights, the ratio or understanding of social justice, which underlies this distribution yes of the common good and individual rights. it is characteristic of every society, individually through the ages. through the years, the new crystallized and has absolutely individual context for all states for all countries is precisely in this. e, the point is that the achievement of a certain single criterion is impossible, there is an ideal. it is on paper, for example, the universal declaration of human rights, but not a single state can say that it has fulfilled it 100%. well, i would like to end with the famous phrase, and who are the judges, so, in my

opinion. er, the thesis that we need to shift the focus to work on human rights in the state, we ourselves should do it. this is very uh, clear clear message. we are doing this in e, in, and we are absolutely responsible for the implementation of such an instrument as the universal periodic review. e human rights within the framework of this human rights. this is our voluntary commitment. we carry it out and receive recommendations that are considered later and considerations from our own understanding of these processes. internal development external development we take certain actions. i wanted to say how much i now questions. yes, now because the question is very complex, you know, you can be free, probably, managing your own life within the framework of those rights that you have only with full understanding and awareness of your own responsibility

and your own obligations to the family to society to the state to any fellow citizens of my country, while these duties and responsibilities should not be. restrictions that you perceive as unfair that is, this is the harmony within you regarding the fact that you have rights, there are duties, that they are harmonious and it suits you and there is your freedom, both internal and external, and in this sense, for example, i consider myself a free person in a particular society in a particular state with specific ones. uh, legal norms with a specific understanding of the public consensus as to what is bad. what is good, we can argue, many will say that that's where the usa or switzerland freedom is more free. that is, there is less state. this is the main point. yes, respectively, there is a feeling that, for example, in

politics there is more freedom what more freedom in the right to walk down the street and shout down with the president. well, let's look at the context, and the context is quite simple. yes, they walk down the street shouting down with the president, each state determines for itself how much this particular act is. still, there are risks or challenges for stability and for the development of society. let's look at brussels or washington or other countries in the west, these countries can exist without a president. these countries can exist without a government. we know periods when the federal government of belgium was not formed for 2 years, and nothing has changed there. for 150-200 years, it has already been established for them that the main elections, including in geopolitics. in economic policy, there has long been a consensus at the level of the elite at the level of the people, and they exist in this situation in a

completely different context. here, look good. you say that there is less state than personal freedom, but the pandemic has shown it to be completely opposite. it turned out that we have freedom in this regard. much more was demonstrated during that period. yes, that is, the state did not influence the individual as much as it was in the west, and moreover, quite specifically, we are only the only thing that is somewhere with sweden. let's reach a consensus in this regard. no, the point is that, in fact, all these spheres are very mobile. yes, i say again, that is, uh, if you take, uh, specific, here is the topic, then, but public freedom in the field of the pandemic, yes, that is, yes, in the west, the path was chosen to vaccinate everyone there, for example, in european countries in most countries, that is, in this sense, as if freedom were not enough, because if you do not go this way, well, all your freedom was that you stay at home and do not disturb anyone. you couldn't go to restaurants, you couldn't go out. uh, on the street and so on, yes, but if you

go back, here's to the topic that i touched on the possibilities. uh, belarus to act by the same methods. yes, how would it happen in the west? i beg to differ with the apologists. this is more freedom at the current stage there, because we have you have different challenges. yeah, every walk down the street of our protesters is primarily about choice. internal development, and immediately after that , the question of the geopolitical orientation of our country immediately arises. therefore, at this stage, in my opinion, our thesis is that we need a strong state. absolutely justified for absolutely objective reasons, the question is, will the role of the state in belarus evolve, i am sure that, of course, it will evolve in direct proportion to growth. here

it is the public consciousness of ours, our protesters who disagree about their own responsibility to all citizens to society as a whole, and not just to their like-minded people, i want you to be heard. well , okay, maybe there are still problems in the definitions, he says he did the details. yes, the opposition is very fond of the word will. in your opinion, what is the difference between will, freedom, well, and sovereignty, but freedom is definitely not lawlessness. the main thing, as a matter of fact, the concept of freedom has entered the discourse. all-russian east slavic western means schools and uh means the ability to independently exercise certain rights. yes, it means to bear the responsibility will. this word, which

we once discussed with one of my russian colleagues, the ambassador of the russian federation, does not, in our opinion, have a direct translation in english with him . hmm, why? because will is something wild, it's something siberian, it's something so taiga, yes, where there are no boundaries for the desire and actions of a person, and when a person lives, uh, in society, but you and i can ask ourselves a question. can a person to be in society, it is a well-known philosophical free in society. can he be free from society? where is the line where your freedom ends, the freedom of another person begins, respectively. eh, will will - this is this chaos. yes, as it were, especially, uh, such an analogy came to something, here the russian field and will even rhyme and the freemen. yes, free will -

in my opinion, these are very close concepts, yes, that is, semantic, and it comes from this. freedom is a very clear understanding of boundaries. yes the fact that you can your rights and the obligations arising from this. will is the ideal. that is, you are in your soul in your heart, maybe, uh, free, yes, that is, absolutely. uh, because you dream of doing something incredible. it is actually, when you enter, so you get up in the morning and go to shave, you do it, because there are certain restrictions, and again i say. yes, you may not shave, but you understand that this will somehow have an effect on your colleagues there, on the image of your television company and sovereignty - this strictly speaking, this is the freedom of the state. yes , well, if you take it more conceptually, these are the abilities of a particular state

, through state institutions, to exercise the rule of power in specific territories, regardless of others. again, this is an ideal situation, because you and i know that there are about 200 recognized unrecognized states on the planet. yes. that is how it would be such a big hostel. here i live in the house. we have 180 apartments. here is a camaraderie where never once for 20 years, the assembly has not met in full, which is called upon to decide. so everything at home is the same. try to negotiate among 180 states. we agree. we have contracts. and these treaties create for us not only rights, that we should live here wonderfully there and all that, and use it, create duties, and precisely these duties. they determine the freedom of action of this or that state in the external arena and not only in the external arena. yes , because our economic obligations questions. here they determine our actions,

including in the economy. let's go. let's touch on the topic of freemen of other states in relation to belarus of freemen. here, let's go straight to the extent to which the packages of sanctions that have been adopted against belarus. they generally fit into the concept of sovereignty, freedom and the concept of human rights sanctions, in fact, this is chaos. yes, this is a more valuable state-wide range of state-level sanctions. this is a fairly commonplace tool for the last 20 years, and not only for the last 20 years, but now it's just that almost everywhere and all on the part of those states that believe that they can use their dominant economic position. paradoxically, the presence of nuclear weapons has brought us to this situation. yes, that is, nuclear deterrence made it impossible. uh, classic wars between large countries, instead

there are economic sanctions, yes, which are quite understandable why they are found. that is, it is and no electoral. they are not smart, they are not aimed at improving our rights with you or specific people in belarus, yes, that is, this is pressure on the government on the authorities in order to achieve some social protests against the background of deteriorating living standards and, accordingly, by internal hands and internal means, additionally calculate this situation if it is shattered and speak to a change of government, therefore there are no illusions here. no. the west seeks only its own interests. e. e strategic geopolitical expansions of the zone of influence, and further move the zone of influence of moscow away from them. eh, everything. it's quite simple,

there is a military carpet bombing term, but it can already be used, then in this sense, if you say that this is a replacement for military actions that are impossible for actually economic actions here, of course, partially. we see that war is still possible. and, in fact, it is. military conflicts took place throughout the existence of the united nations at different points between, among other things, the two superpowers for years while the soviet union existed, like in korea, like in vietnam, like in other places and afghanistan and so on, the same thing is happening now in ukraine well, you held the position, yes, deputy spread to nato and the eu, yes, and the head of an international organization of the un system, i, yes, headed

the political body and the governing bodies of the european economic united nations commission is good. here i would like to dwell a little on these organizations. yes , in more detail, let's start the dream a month ago at the seventy- seventh session of the un assembly, uh, vladimir, your leader, spoke. yes, and he stated, uh, gap between the current he and the rapidly growing diversity of the world, that is, the loss of neutrality. and equality party, let's get straight. do we need such a united nations that today is increasingly dividing nations. maybe it has already taken the path of the league of nations, and it needs to be transformed, to put it mildly, to reorganize, right? you know, i will answer, right now i will say to your question that in my opinion. it is impossible to reform the un without

reforming international relations. isn't this the same thing. this is absolutely not the same thing, because the united nations is just a reflection. yes, that is, as it were, the status and level of relations between states here , uh, in this hostel, a big giver of the opinion that he can and should resolve all issues. this is public. this is absolutely wrong opinion. it is a platform platform structure that is ideally designed to serve as a place of collaboration. the first is the simplest thing we have, otherwise today it is an opportunity for the same minister or the president of the republic belarus to come standing on the podium, he will tell the whole world everyone who wants to hear us. all that he thinks about the international situation or on a specific problem. well, let's agree that from the fact that our political leaders will speak on

belarusian television, not everyone, but the political leaders of other countries, heard the majority, did not hear such a platform. that is, we are talking playground. yes, this is a platform. well then, maybe a little non-diplomatic questions. yes, the special representative, he is from the usa on with a blue eye declares that viagra is given to russian soldiers in order for them to rape in ukraine, and women, men and children of anyone, anyone, immediately appear in my head. this is a flashback. yes, uh, in the twentieth year and that's it. the same theme of violence sexual violence these batons in uh, condoms and so on. yes, i remember your interview with the french media yes, where you were already forced to fight off the topic of violence. sex shame fear yes words with the letter c they stand apart in advertising and marketing they are not used.

that's whose presentation on the un rostrum begins this terminology and such primitive manipulative actions. well, whoever hurts is talking about that , this is the first thing that comes to mind, but if you answer seriously, then of course this method is specific and propaganda and is aimed at ensuring that e is now a fashionable word. yes, that is, dehumanization, there is the demonization of the enemy, in fact. this is a very clear psychological technique when you hate a person, when you consider him a moral monster, it is easier to destroy him. this tool is that it makes a special representative. he e once again proves, e, the theses that a wrote in his letter. our foreign minister addressed his colleagues just the day before. all-all means the un general

assembly where he outlined several problematic points and two main points. this is what he is actually doing now, and the role of the mouthpiece of the west and nato, yes, that is, well, let's be a platform, yes, the current one. eh, condition. uh, it means that the influence of the west on the composition of the united nations has been brought to such a situation. oh that the majority countries prefer e? support the us or the west not only in relation to russia on any issues. yeah , unfortunately, if they don't support them, they simply abstain, that is, there are mechanisms that allow you not to express your position. and thanks to these mechanisms, if someone sets a task, here he is to pass a resolution today that the republic of belarus will be called the locomotive of the planet task.