here are the comments of the commander of this division, who said the following, if an attack is made on nato, then we are completely ready to cross the border of ukraine in general, if you read carefully , he spoke not only about the nato factor because, in principle, they have a wide enough corridor to invade and enter to ukraine and here the experts immediately undertook, uh, to assume what it was? it was carelessness of wording. eh, commander or still you need to read it in such a way that now no one will look back. they will not go to any fifth article, the charter on there, when they want. true a couple of days later, the white house made a statement that i quote the united states will not send its troops to ukraine despite the statements of individual commanders. introducing pavlovich who is lying, who to trust the commander or the white house or trust no one, considering what a complex information game is now being played in this case at a short distance at a short distance it is necessary, uh, listen. to the opinion

of official washington and not by expressing positions individual military commanders, that is, in the operational perspective. i do not see the likelihood that the united states of america will take a direct and not indirect part in this conflict, but in general you are absolutely right in that part that if a political decision of this kind is made to involve the introduction of a limited contingent of nato troops into the conflict ukraine, they will find a legal justification for their actions. here, including bypassing the fifth article of the installer, because , well, the practice that has developed earlier is shows that international treaties, in general, the international security architecture that took shape in the 20th century. she's bursting at the seams now. and basically, uh, everyone interprets. e international law and this system of agreement, various statutory documents are arbitrary, in essence. it is not the power of the right of force that is at work here, but for the time being uh, that means understanding the risks and threats here. involvement of direct involvement in the

conflict, of course, the white house will refrain from this. and what was it on the part of an individual commander? here uh of this division yes eagles, so, uh, it could mean an operation, uh , in order to find out, uh, opinions on this issue, that is, perhaps this is a thrown stone, yes, which was supposed to cause some kind of circles on the water, first of all in the russian information space, a reaction the russian side to probe, but it could just be a human factor. and even the military sometimes. although it is generally accepted that the military speak out exclusively on orders, and so on sometimes the military. uh, so this system is failing. so he could just express his own point of view, which does not correlate with the opinion of the center oleg alexandrovich agrees. well, in general. yes, i would like to add the following, that it seems to me that there could also be a game here, that is, a distribution of roles, where everyone performs his function, let's say that he really is a commander. e, speaks out, but in order to give. the white house

is bound by many many ties, that is, these remnants of international law and fear. well, maybe at this stage to make some kind of loud statement, while it sounds from the division commander. well, maybe not, uh, defiantly, but at this is a real signal. they could send. eh, through him and in this sense, i would not consider it now as some kind of personal private opinion rather. it seems to me that he was just instructed to express and bring it to light in this way. in general, the existing willingness to go. further than the us is going now. this is my guess. of course we have information. well, of course, i don’t know , of course, we simultaneously understand that, if the practical component already says that the exercises are going on and there are these paratroopers the americans, together with nato units, are conducting exercises and noticed some white stripes on these combat vehicles and said that there are similar ones, for example, tactical marks on ukrainian equipment, which means no no, or rather, does this mean

that nothing else is happening , like combat coordination in order to later transfer these same units somewhere in odessa, so here they multitask. yes, i also drew attention to these white armbands and to the actual combat coordination. uh, those could be indirect signs. hmm, that he is planning some kind of attacking operation, uh, including on the territory of ukraine well , of course, hiding behind and therefore providing the vanguard of ukrainian military personnel, but also note that their teaching is not of a defensive nature. they have all sorts of cases , all of which they are now working on, primarily of an attacking nature. and this says a lot, well, they work out both defensive and offensive operations. let's face it, and moreover, this is happening quite a long time ago, including in e, the territory bordering belarus with a military points of view. here are colleagues who wear shoulder straps. they say that the

study of a potential theater of operations is actually taking place on a rotational basis, that is, tens of thousands of military personnel of the united states of america are already of this kind. and training, uh, which allows you to generally act in an environment. e of our region have passed. well, in addition, i would note the following is not necessary. after all, the direct involvement of nato in the conflict, that is, under the flag of it, today russian sources they say that about 70,000 foreign mercenaries are fighting in the armed forces of ukraine , they are mainly called such strange ones as poland, great britain, turkey, for this reason, which means these units that are practicing offensive operations. in general, they can enter the territory of ukraine without a flag, and i will even pay attention to the fact that in the new version of the concept of national security prepared by the state psychological security council and experts at the moment. belarus we are hybrid threats. that is, when against e, the countries

are carried out aggressive e, armed provocations without indicating the source of aggression, that is, it is done by some rebels, some groups, private military companies. we consider these hybrid threats as top-priority, no one prevents ukraine from signing a contract with a private military company, especially since it is legal in ukraine , and the factor is the participation of foreigners in hostilities. and in general, bring these professionals there, and russia is now warning about the possibility of using a dirty bomb. we see, how the west dismisses formations. it seems like such an obviously false statement. that's what it's probably obvious. here let's. this sequence was followed, and today some countries are declaring terrorists to russia, but give me at least one example when russia really acted as a terrorist country bucha maybe, but the russian side requests. uh, the specific surname of the persons who died in the bucha, allegedly, and those killed by russian

soldiers, these surnames are not provided, we cross out. let's see ukraine obvious facts, the murder of darya dugin proof, in my opinion, does not require the crimean bridge, but we will not go into it now either. here in this situation, but it really happened and everyone understands perfectly well that the ukrainians did it. how is this not a terrorist attack, but today russia is saying that we can get an even more terrible problem of a dirty bomb, there is, uh, intelligence data about it, but no one wants to hear it, without it the threat is already global. this is a global threat to russia, and it will respond to this, of course, and this is actually reaction. this is a chain reaction that will lead to irreparable consequences for me. it is strange that both the united states of america and europe do not think, especially western europe, because in the case of application. god forbid this dirty bomb will be detonated, if it will also be a problem not

only for russia and ukraine, a dirty bomb, which is even worse than a nuclear one, as it is a tactical nuclear strike. here. well, you see, here is such a system around. well, the system. distrust non-acceptance of what the russians say. here is a game being played as for a nuclear bomb, then the radius of destruction, according to military experts again, will be 1500 km, with a high degree of probability the republic of poland will be affected and, accordingly, there is a threat and the spread of a radioactive cloud , including the republic of belarus, so we are generally concerned about the introduction into discourse the world's leading powers are likely to use nuclear weapons. whether it's a dirty bomb, a tactical nuclear weapon, or something else. let me remind you that this is literally. uh, gunner united states of america regular staff exercises were conducted, where the scenario of delivering nuclear strikes on the territory of russia was simulated, and i can say that an analysis of

previous exercises of this kind, at least the information that is in the public domain , shows that both during the cold war and not so long ago during the reign of barack obama, it means that the infliction of nuclear strikes on the territory of the russian radio was necessarily accompanied by the infliction of a nuclear strike on the republic of belarus as an element of the defense of the e of the soviet union important at that time, the belarusian soviet socialist republic and the republic of belarus, the current one, as it means e, the state e, which is part of the union state of russia and belarus, that is, we are again our military-strategic significance e, indicates to the americans the need to inflict fire damage and our country therefore, we categorically oppose the use of nuclear weapons. we have repeatedly proposed making europe a zone free of e, e missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. so, uh, nevertheless, unfortunately, they were not heard were not heard to add to what alexander was talking about the fact that now the rhetoric of the western

elites is no longer probabilities, but about plans, that is. uh, i'm talking about what they are already saying, as a fait accompli, a decision has been made russia is going to use ah, but it's only about the place and time, supposedly, by doing so they really introduce into people's consciousness the necessity and inevitability of using nuclear weapons, that is, such informational ideological preparation. that's understanding it russian permanent representative to the un vasily nebenzya has already made a statement that russia will regard the use of a dirty bomb by kiev as an act of nuclear terrorism, and so that we do not blur these formations from the other side. here you turn. we are with you, when we talk about the fact that there are some dirty deeds, and they come here, the united states of america, we understand that this is the main country that is now facing such threats. maybe, you shouldn't be surprised, after all. here is a completely fresh example of american scientists created a new strain. covid. super high lethality boston university scientists crossed one of the fragments and a microcon with the very

first virus from suffocation, and reached an ultra-high infectious lethality of 80%. hence the dirty bomb. uh, biological weapons in the form of a species are already american scientists. on this, the nobel laureate does not hide the fact that the covid came out of the test tube, and already how it spread further there. this is a matter of technology, as always, as the classics said, including marxism-leninism. yes always no such a crime that capital will not go to for the sake of 300%, and always, by any political actions, economic interests will be swallowed up. that's what the world will not swallow the information field. here the world swallows, for example, voters change the government all the time. here, look now, we were very happy that the italian voters changed completely for the first time in 100 years. everything, the government comes to the government on these

opposing antagonistic slogans. uh, to the government that was and what it repeats continues the former police. well, that is, you understand, that is, people vote. well this is in no way with us, when the people eh? has influence on political decision-making people vote they do nothing. for our viewers, what the tunes said first called zelensky and said that she would continue to provide full support, that is, instead of dealing with issues of energy supply inflation. she continues to continue pumping the weapon to the detriment. the actual population. frankly , we knew it. here's how it started ok. yes, and let's say, i warned my russian colleagues at one time that one should not be fascinated, so as not to be disappointed later , because at the level of discursive george meloni the abolition of the so-called civil partnership is one of the forms of legalization of

same-sex unions after a civil partnership, the usual legalization takes place after some time on the shelves and a lesson at the same time man walks with the most beautiful pure ones. and i don’t have time to win with promises and immediately change them i don’t want to delve into science, but the leading western political scientists who do not hesitate to assess the state of their society objectively say that the media say that democracy is participatory democracy, when a citizen participates in political processes have long been replaced by contemplative democracy by mediacracy. that is, for example, thomas meyer, says, uh, writes, or rather in his works. that is, in this case, a citizen he is a passive spectator to whom those images of the forest are imposed, and again he even votes for politicians, he votes only for those politicians who are offered by the media , who, again, for all their large numbers. ultimately owned by a few people or a company. this trend is very disturbing, because the voter times. e, over and over again

faced with this situation, when no one articulates his interests. naturally, he will look away from my point of view radically. well, who is not excluded, someone and someone in the uk, they didn’t ask voters at all , yes, literally in a matter of hours a new prime ministerial colleague was appointed. i think that here we need to pay attention to something else, to look for the reasons for this, it is clear that they are so deep. maybe, well, philosophical, maybe not quite for a short conversation as long as there is the power of capital in the world, everything will continue. how goes on. that's what, uh, he's talking about and they'll swallow and they'll buy and eliminate. uh, objectionable and so on until then as long as it will be here is this social economic political system based on the power of capital. we will have corrupt governments. we will have passive citizens who have been bought, intimidated, appeased by some. i don't know there entertainment and things like that and now, uh, that's the real problem. and it seems to me that now the war is going on along with other things it is for the fact that the

power of capital, either overthrow, or at least weaken and create sovereign states, or blocs of states that can live not under the rule of the dollar, not under power. vf and others structures that dictate their economic rules of the game and only in this situation we can why such desperate resistance? why, like a rat driven into a corner, they are ready to blow up their power with a bomb, power, how thanks to which they suck the juices from the whole world, they fatten on uh alexandrovich son, the question is even, if we take the purchase of vaccines, which was carried out by the chairman of the european commission, she purchased 10 doses, vaccines for each european worth more than 74 billion euros. we are talking here and we used to talk there in russia about some palaces. there is one palace, yes, medvedev or someone else, yes, an oligarch, uh, that means, and here uh, that means an amount comparable to the budget and twice the budget of the republic of belarus corruption component what dmitry

alexandrovich said about the component of human life they are ready destroy the population, because it becomes unprofitable is not a source of demand source. e making money. here i would add that here is for our viewers. but it is too primitive to consider this war. let's say, as a war between countries here, probably we are talking about a war of images of the future of mankind, and war - this takes place not only in the theater of ukrainian hostilities or some other international ones. uh, let's say external theaters. it is still taking place inside russia, and here are many oddities that we see in the process of this special military operation, which is difficult to explain from the point of view of formal logic. they are connected with this struggle. russia itself is now trying to cleanse itself of the very capital, oh which you spoke and it must be said that the party. eh, the defeatist party of defeat in russia is quite strong, and sometimes certain excesses that we

see are explained by the actions of this party. her influence is her attempts to reverse the situation, which, however, is actually under the slogans of a certain pragmatism. uh, freezing negotiations. in fact , things are leading in the long run to the defeat of russia. i hope the russian leadership understands this. let's take one more moment. this moment you started this topic really, a the events that took place in the uk, we have already discussed italy, you know briefly. let's go through some tags and try to understand, how fashionable it is now, here is this case. so the track left, having worked for 45 days and during these days. e runs, it seems, managed to turn everyone she could against herself, and a remarkable moment after the statement for the press, the journalists spent her outright laughing. in general, the ex-prime minister has become the heroine of numerous memes. here is one of them, the track is the most effective agent of russia, killed the queen, destroyed the economy and destroyed the conservative party. thank you for your service, comrade tras, and here is 36, sunnak. he came to

her place, it’s correct to say they came, in general, a surprisingly dizzying career since 2015, a person appears on the political arena. and suddenly such growth and many are already talking. what, but he will look like and at least, because smarter than a diplomat, a tanker, listraz, is certainly smarter. i hope that's it, but you need to understand what could be better for us, so that he, like a fox, would perform, of course, but i want to tell you, or something, rhinestone, that drawing is, in general, two winged birds, birds fly with them m-m father. yes, of course, but i want to tell you that, in principle, of course, today the sunk got into such a situation that something needs to be changed, of course, to put things in order, er, to do a general cleaning. the one that, in general, in this mess that the rhinestone has done. uh, this concerns the country's economy, and today, of course, his statement was also that he supports ukraine. well, of course, orchestra. here they

play not the last violin against the russian great britain. naturally, they support ukraine, but we must not forget that there is a people of their own attitude towards the people of the mari-tsa. here, look, we are talking about

rich british citizens to give up their assets in russia in order not to support the criminal regime, and then it turns out that his wife is, well , she has in the main fund of one of the large indian consulting companies, he has her included to this authorized capital of this company the head office of this company in moscow well, listen, well, why be a man with such a double bottom, and when a question is asked to him in the forehead. he says, well, you know that i'm on my own my wife is on her own, though we have a common money, you know, well, that is such a peculiar personality. let's see how it will unfold, that what we are talking about the people of britain in general is a vanishing little quantity. uh, now the peoples in europe have ceased to be a factor in politics at all, maybe they will become one again if they take to the streets there, yes, uh

they will remember their revolutionary past, there are the great french revolution, other revolutions, but yes, but now they are disappearing a little, if we talk about the prime minister, i think that in general it is necessary to pay less attention to those people who appear there, i will explain why britain has no friends. she has interests. this is one of the principles. e british politics. i will not follow my interests. british british litas, very tight-knit. these are several dozen families who have known each other for a long time. there centuries is in family ties and so on the factor of the british royal house. he is not needed. no need to evaluate. this is a primitive idea that the monarch in britain, er, rules, but rules, but does not rule and well reigns, but is incorrectly incorrect. uh, strong threads of social control or through the elite through the papal thrones and so on. all of it is preserved. and in this sense, we must take into account the fact that this is an elite. she will pursue her interests, and her

interest now is to prevent what we said above, e., the removal from power of the anglo-saxons, who are one of the major owners of world capital. after oleg glya sanovich, it is difficult for me to add something. i’m just uh, i’ll formulate the thought that i have repeatedly said, in the case of the uk with the west, in principle, but with the uk, first of all , the role of public policy for analyzing ongoing events does not seem to be an important factor in political leadership. it is not as relevant there as it is acceptable for our region. e britain is a state with a centuries-old tradition of shadow politics, a strategic decision even neo support for ukraine and when the ukrainian conflict was unleashed , it was not taken by johnson will implement this course is one of the elements of keeping the power of the city of london its influence.

this means that we have a financial oligarchy in the world and, in general , the processes of globalization. this theater of combat actions on the territory of ukraine ukraine is the territory of the war ukrainians, lanskoy in this situation in this war, so we can gloat, of course, this is a transport disaster, because well, she is a caricature character. it probably evoked certain negative emotions in all of us, but in fact, for the republic of belarus, the appearance of a bag there does not change anything, as far as a holey shoe is concerned. well, does anyone seriously believe that a person whose fortune, in my opinion, is more than 700 million pounds sterling, personally. these are not wives, came to the debate. well, you understand that this is all pr cheap pr uh, in the same context, when, for example, zelensky's wife told some american tabloid that she did not know that her husband was running for president and only when she saw his debate with poroshenko, she found clarification and indeed. here he goes to the presidency. she did not know

the quality of the show of politics continues, that is, well, with cheap pr and, uh, that means the thesis of a double day that she voiced. marina alexandrovna i want to remind uh, the famous photograph of sunanak on gas station, he was photographed in a budget electric car during the election campaign. after that after a while it turned out that he just borrowed asked someone from uh, so refueling there uh for photos. listen, this can only be fed relatively speaking, belarusian russian some kind of hipster hamster snowflakes of these presidents on bicycles eating shawarma. here, i will give you an example in moldova, now there is an absolutely pro-soros government there in power. all graduates of the foundation's program soros, and the former director of the program even heads the local intelligence agency. and so they recently decided to hold an offsite meeting of the government in one of the district centers in the city of ungheni. they went there by train, but they were followed by a

cortege of government cars, in which they returned back to chisinau, journalists. let's go back on these trains let's go well, you understand everything, this circus surprises me what else is in the world, especially people in our latitudes. who really believe in it. and sincerely. and here, let's now talk about another international event. here the level of decision-making and public demonstration of what can be shown what cannot be completely different. this, of course, is the 20th congress that ended in beijing in general in china, not only in beijing. uh, we’re sitting pins, he remains at his post, goes further with a renewed team, especially to this inner circle that is in the standing committee on litter, how the pc is located, and the president of belarus, he noted congratulations, minsk extremely cherishes the iron brotherhood and all-weather friendship. with beijing, we really understand that this is strategic not only from the point of view of the economics of technology exchange from the point of view of national security. this is very important for us, but how, and how aleksandrovich we are a relatively small republic

received the status of an all-weather friend of huge china, which today, well, we see how important it is in the world but i think this is due to many factors, one of them - these are the ambitions of china as a world leader and being such, and he or wishing to become such and already becoming, and he takes into account the mistakes that the former hegelmon made, we can talk about this in the usa and he is no longer a moral nor, uh, political leader of the world, what are these mistakes of the usa neglecting the interests of other countries lack of real allies whose interests he would protect anyway. uh, in general, a disregard for everything except yourself. and so. uh, if china wants to be a leader, it must , uh, establish relationships with its partner allies that are respectful. profitable. and i think right here is one of one of the reasons, another one of the reasons. this is hmm

an opportunity to cooperate with a country that occupies a very strong geopolitical position in the russian continent, the center of europe. and we keep it here. yes, respectively, from here it is possible to establish all economic flows and political ties with the european eurasian countries. well, or, of course, it cannot be denied and the factor of personal relations cannot be overestimated. never because in politics personal relations e up to a certain level, but they are also a factor of human good friendly relations between sitipin and alexander lukashenko, he also plays a role. i would, i would answer, i would note this particular factor, including, because, unlike, say, the western world. here we have britain. uh, maybe there are some rough edges in our country in terms of political technology. we do not know how to manipulate public consciousness, as they do. they are our president pursuing his policy sincerely purposefully. we have a factor personalities in history. let's admit it objectively

, and how at one time peter i cut a window to europe, so lukashenko cut a window to china from the ninety-fifth year because these routes are white. president to beijing - this is the purposeful policy of the ninety-fifth year and, in fact, every 2 years. we are having a summit and high-level meeting with the chinese, and it is clear that in 1995, the fact that china would be the leader of the world economy was not so obvious to many. this is perfectly clear. we all remember attitude china chinese products. and how it has changed now gradually china is becoming and partnership with china is a certain kind. uh, a sign of quality, so the belarusian president, of course, he is here, uh, has solved a lot of important issues. well , for china, we are also interesting. we opened in a new one. in this capacity, including, again, after the destabilization of the situation in ukraine, ukraine objectively pursues an anti-chinese policy, an enterprise that the chinese acquired with borrowed money was confiscated. well, actually, many experts. they say that maidan 2014 was

directed not so much against russia in the long run. how many against china who planned to use the port infrastructure of ukraine for their e? the silk road economic belt projects have not yet ended the congress, and then the west, through the washington post, declares the rise of china is incompatible with the strategic interests of the united states and even less compatible with the rules-based world order. listen to the rules. they themselves came up with them, they do not comply, they change, during the game and others try and fail. it is the matter of time. uh. i doubt that china will take back taiwan militarily, at least in the short term. i don't think this is good. here, even then i will add oil to this fire, so that we will become completely aggravated, and we will understand. here, look commander of naval operations. us admiral michael gilda states. in my opinion. it should be a window of 2022 or 23. we must be ready to fight tonight to bring forth the deadliest forces. what can we do

he talks about how the united states should be ready to go to war from china over taiwan this year. and what? we, among other things, must do when the enemy’s intention is obvious to us and it is clear that he is waiting, we must come up with some kind of asymmetric response. china has two precedents for the return of its racing territories. macau is both unrelated to a military solution. i can tell you that in taiwan, a significant part of the society is the so-called unionists who support, uh, joining mainland china. by the way, when there was a visit by the notorious saw, she was not only greeted with applause, but there were also people who protested. it seems to me that the people's republic of china will stake on the development of such public sentiments. it seems to me like this, uh, it is unlikely that china will do what the states are so expecting from it, the states are waiting for it to get involved in the war, because they understand that, probably, from the point of view. here are the combat capabilities of the chinese army, who does not have such significant combat experience and the american army, which is constantly.