uh, with our fugitives in the camp they were hardly stuffed there in august in this one bag. uh, tikhanovskaya's office. yes, and you know, here they have an office, probably they closed the door, and they still stuffed it with their feet, lettuce, he resisted the door, they locked it , putting this bald sucker. so guarding there with shooting, by the way, is interesting. i recently listened to this extremist. he learned the belarusian language from him, did not know it, but he speaks. represent in belarusian with a polish accent. here go it turned out there. yes, lieutenant colonel, he says, yushman, polish words slip constantly. this is how they line up. that's what they are some belarusian politicians. they have this polish accent will all the time break through exactly the same way as these feigins and kasparov khodorkovskys, no matter how they declare, what they think about the future of the russian people is their main topic. how to divide russia how to make russia weaken in the future and people see it, that is, people see our people. here we are talking, what now, when is the meeting in the republic? when

we explain, they see that evil comes from these people. so they declared peace and began to form military formations on the territory of ukraine under their own type of command, then their command is not recognized. that is, they make up with each other there, the same khodorkovsky all the rest cannot. well, who will trust them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to determine the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find parts to place a bet, what kind of money to pump there? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist group cannot be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also using them for our russian related work. why did they agree? i, uh, would have seen more subtle settings here, it seems to me, but anti-russian rhetoric

developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the leadership of the russian federation, in particular vladimir putin, and the waves that accompanied it in parallel were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line against the government. for the leadership of russia, it has already exhausted itself and it is necessary to look for new mechanisms for information work with the population. indeed, even in our countries, the neighbors declared a long time ago that the russians should make a revolution at home, not sit here with us, but make a revolution at home and attract russians to this topic. creation here are such already quite uh, clearly defined structures. it just indicates that the information that needs to be conveyed at this stage should be voiced by the russians, that is, the code that they should send should be a russian code. not western, because western ones no longer work. er, i totally agree. with vadim frantsevich

, it is impossible not to pay attention to this, because it is not clear. at what stage it can go into another phase, it is impossible to feel it, and western diplomats came to our kurapaty. yes , that’s not how it all is, right? so, when we say grouse, i would generally suggest that this word should be abandoned, this word was invented in the winter. well , the tract where the masses understand, and we continue this myth created there in the late eighties and pozdnyak did it on purpose, but don't care. he wanted those people who were shot and the nef would not give a damn. e. they constantly exaggerate these figures and why do they emphasize this word kurapaty, because they strive. here, turn this into a part of your biography into a part of your political history for them, kurapaty, like the chernobyl way, this is not a memory of those who were shot and this is not a memory. the catastrophe

at the nuclear power plant is the memory of the origins of the combat memory of their political youth, which could lead them to power because we constantly repeat this word. we're working pouring water on their mill. no, no partridges. this invented name is wonderful. i am very glad that you made this remark absolutely, and it is all the more complemented by absurdity and outrage on our part. that's why western diplomats came to this tract, the oppositionists who used to go there are gone, western diplomats came, the question arises. here we are constantly talking about what is going on, if this hybrid war imposed on us by the west is not open and western diplomats come to this tract why at this time in order to send us some kind of message. what can you think of it? why is mussolini recalling the same moment, when, for example, in italy, a fascist march is taking place no one comes to the italian embassy and talks about the trail and the victims who reach out for the name of musalini. here's how to treat the fact that

western diplomats and ours may have some kind of tolerance of incomprehensible humanity, when we look at it this way, well, with an understanding of it, or how they look at holy fools. that is why we allow us to be treated like this, when they try to demonstrate something to our population and us on our territory or to send some message here, a message that they lay in these visits and so on. places like this. this is again pedaling the fact that the soviet union is negative, this is a totalitarian society, because it absolutely does not correspond from a scientific point of view absolutely. eh, so these things they play on the political situation that is unfolding in the world, it is necessary to open this underwater one. they came there, not to commemorate the people who died, but to make a policy on the spot once again to show their accents. here the west says that the ussr soviet society is bad. why are you on it focus on us. look how good we are, how we keep your memory of this tragedy. although they wanted to spit, as it

was already said here the rest, the first thing to do is to ignore them, they do not exist. there we are inflating this topic. some handful of some diplomats came. they go everywhere, that they walk through the forest, they all went to the forest, and you and i are creating an informational occasion. who knows about this in belarus , today we are discussing the pot on national television. uh, mean cum drop they come, uh, to the victory monument and get down to their knees. so merkel thumped on her knees buchenwald, let them thump on their knees, for each folded belarusian child. they are reached through the forest. there is logic here, on the one hand, that it is not necessary to attach such importance to this, on the other hand, these are representatives of official representatives of foreign states, and they declare the position of their sovereigns on our territory . we can't help but react to what civil society is reacting to. look see no state until they saw maybe if i had missed the statement there mida oh well, probably will. uh, let's hope so, but

civil society is responding. after all, those who came there to protest against this parish. these are not just journalists, they are the leader of public opinion. and our patriots, our people demand from these diplomats to stop such walking, that is, the people themselves demand. because if this goes unpunished, they will perceive it as a challenge to our national identity, our national memory, so of course we can't allow that. but what else pleases me is this reaction of diplomats - this is the reaction of some neighboring states. uh, a hysterical response to our historical politics. here are examples that the belarusian state. i assure you. i see, even the younger generation. i don't want to overestimate the tree. there's no knocking here, right? yes , but it is bearing fruit that we are changing the school course in history, that we taught chickens from the history of belarusian statehood. we have upgraded and now we are watching. how is the teaching of social science block universities. yes, uh, a year of historical memory

, what we are doing, in addition to implementing ours , is that we are dealing with negative and collaborators and the regional army and everything that is here . eh, that's the worst. here in this rat, uh, rat essence of this pseudo-nationalism, implicated in some kind of pro-polish intentions. we hit such people there, we destroy the basis of the ideology that lay uh, in the attempted coup d'état of the twentieth year. and naturally. we will e we will speak the truth and stalinist repressions. we will speak the truth, but those who create these myths will not need the truth. and there we have any pseudo-kurapats, that is , we grieve for any victims that were made , especially since the state recognized that the victims were innocent, but the state did it, and people are trying to pervert this memory, using

their political interests, only with the truth be neat pump in the nineties forced to tell the truth, and in our country every chekist was a criminal, you know or not, and many policemen, so to speak, were shown separate great documents. and we continue our program, move on in more detail, let's talk about poland, which has already become such a permanent threat. and this one does not hide. e, state secretary of the light of security of belarus in alfovich in an interview with sb belarus today, and said the political course. warsaw clearly indicates preparations for war. well, i would like to draw attention to the curious material that was published by the belgian portal modern diplomos of modern diplomacy and we read in their plans about polish politicians quite specific quotes the right-wing justice party's plan to revive the republic of poland within the boundaries of historical lands. it seems

that operations on the territory of the former ussr took shape long before the russian war, writes this portal, the authors of this article believe that in the event of the seizure of the territory, warsaw will try to hold a referendum to become part of poland because the polish authorities will already be defeated by that time, i draw attention to writes about this. belgian edition, and how realistic is the scenario olga i would pay attention first of all to the fact that this is more the opinion of polyakov and not the portal. just reprinted this article. yes, yes, uh, and uh, this is just a scenario of which there is one and scenarios for the development of the situation, of which there are many today, it is possible to see it as realistic. i think two tracks should be watched here. these are the possibilities of a political track and a military track, if we are talking about a military track for poland in particular, then that’s all, otherwise, about what, e said. uh, secretary of state, uh in belarus in

alfovich and the security council and the numbers that were translated. they are completely in line with the situation. this is true, but you need to see what is on the other side, but on the other side. after all , more, being a member of nato and, according to her own statement, an exemplary member of nato, therefore, in any case, she will coordinate all her actions with her allies for her. this is extremely important, and this is a military track, as far as political poland is a member of the european union and the legitimacy of its actions, obtaining some kind of permits is also extremely important for poland. but the position of poland is tough, uncompromising and unequivocal. it is very difficult to perceive in the european union, and for the colonization of poland, which warns a separate european policy, it is. and that's what i printed. uh, belgian portal. we can consider, of course, from the point of view that this is how it could be in the direction of poland. well, maybe this is a warning for europe

, uh, what plans are hatched by individual countries of this moment. you understand, in order to talk about the fact that the mass of these complex factors, today it greatly hinders the speed of movement of humanity on the sly. i would like to point out what point, yes, we can talk about reality. realistically, well, look, after all, in fact, poland has already taken a step towards creating another commonwealth. they also received special rights for their citizens on the territory of ukraine, which is like not a recreation, which means that this polish commonwealth had this first step, they had it so the polish is already perceived in fact. yes , at first, as they created in 1569. they were focused on this by the polish elites to impose this colonization on these lands, which became part of the commonwealth and further systematically. methodically, from century to century, these things have been realized and now there is a new turn in the twentieth year. they declared openly, that they need the same whole of belarus , not only for the western eastern cross, yes , they claim their own, but for our entire territory, and in

ukraine they have an opportunity. they already have achieved special rights may enter into public bodies. and this is good ground for , as they say, to come out of the shadows at the right time and make these lands part of the polish state. colleagues in the first place, what is happening, all this has long been described. predicted and it was all planned. listen in order to motivate the country to take certain actions. here think the country had huge losses, and the great patriotic war for them it was the second world war. they were historical memory , but it was necessary to formulate in society such concepts that would allow them to perceive militarization normally. the second is to form the image of the enemy set up on the one hand against the russian federation, on the other hand, it’s like occupiers on the other hand against germany, reparations to germany for this, the americans very competently threw the idea of ​​​​great poland from the sea, to the sea and exploited this idea and still

exploit it for in order to motivate poland to this aggressive militaristic position. it was not just that the ideal infrastructure for the transfer of troops. it’s not just that money was pumped in there, and today poland no longer understands one thing, what these plans for greater poland are building. they are a tool and the first striking force that they want to send the old world does not want to fight. here, poland this is the next force behind ukraine, which will fight. the baltic states did not have enough resources to arrive; they create the conditions for the deployment of nato bass on their territory. but poland, from the point of view of the population of the depth of the territory, is ready for some concept to carry out military operations. she 's practically today. well, and an independent international subject, which can wage war without the participation of nato. if you look at the troops that are being concentrated in poland and at the technical support of these troops, then poland today can independently conduct an operation in regional conflicts, poland from my

point of view. again, this is a prime example of this policy, share the power of the anglo- saxon policy, which is carried out because the united states of great britain does not interested. everything in the strong european union, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the eternal enemy for the west - this means russia, those who are in alliance with it, and poland is just the perfect tool that allows you to keep both one and the other in good shape. and under the threat of some of these actions, they really won’t, but the fact remains that poland is the conductor of this anglo-saxon policy on the territory of continental europe and still belittled the importance of the polish politicians themselves and did not belittle their subjectivity. and we see that eastern european politicians, whether it be orban or e, means that the poles, regardless of what they stake on, they carry out their policy. enough on their own and, of course, the americans did not throw away the idea of ​​a great poland, it is a permanence, well, they exploited it. well, let's just say it straight out regardless. this was before the united states became a great power, this idea is present.