oh, more from my point of view, again, this is a prime example of this divide, rule anglo-saxon policy that is carried out because the united states of great britain is not interested. everything in the strong european union, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the eternal enemy for the west - this means russia and those who are in alliance with it, and poland is just the perfect tool that allows you to keep both one and the other in good shape. yes, and under the threat of some of these actions, they really will not, but the fact it remains a fact that poland is the conductor of this anglo-saxon policy on the territory of continental europe, they came all the same to the importance of the polish politicians themselves and did not belittle their subjectivity. we see that eastern european politicians, whether orban or, uh, means poles , no matter what they bet on. they carry out the policy quite independently. and, of course, the americans did not throw away the idea of ​​greater poland; they permanently exploited it. well, let's say it straight out regardless. this was even before the us became a great power this idea. you are in the polish establishment permanently

and moreover, no one formulates it like the great one. poland, he has the name of the fourth speech of the commonwealth, it all revolves around this. this plan is from my point of view. he is not realistic. eh, why do we need to think of something for the poles what they want to do, perhaps he is somewhere there in some kind, so i don’t know the polish drawers, there is the general staff or some kind of party headquarters. they are open about what they want to do. that they have a plan, if you have a plan mister fix fix, says there is a plan, they have a plan, the fourth speech , germany and france european strength for this. so we think that the americans are using the poles. and in warsaw they think that i am not using the poles and these americans. yes, they use to their advantage, that is, more should become equal from berlin and with paris the next moment the creation of the chain. them away

poland states from the baltic to the black sea, and they take here the caucasus, for example, georgia, too, for this they do not need to include territories. why? so i don’t believe that they can hold such a referendum, it’s the belgians. and by the way, speaking westerners do not fully understand our mentality. they now think russia held a referendum and poland will. well, in donetsk, whoever was in the donbass understands that there most of the people sympathize with russia, there are those who do not support it, but a significant part sympathizes with what do you think in lviv like this here residents will go and vote for more. and even if they do, this referendum is a terrible dream for the poles to include in their state. there are 10 million ukrainians and there are already several million refugees living there, and another 10 million ukrainians. they directly state. this will be the bongarization of poland, and this is not what they are afraid of. but the creation of a network of protectorates all these dependent puppet states. these are their goals, what vyacheslav viktorovich spoke about. this is an agreement. it's actually

a protectorate agreement not much time remains, but we involuntarily come to this topic, and the topic of global confrontation. here on the recent ah. valdai, vladimir putin said that we have come not to a systemic crisis, but to a doctrinal one . what does it mean, in principle, if we say in general terms that we all already understood that the system of international relations has broken down, but in order to build a new kind of the world order needs everyone to answer the main question. under what conditions will we build it? well, this is, if you formulate the general general, yes, but after all doctrinality, it is also about values ​​and about meaning. in this case, it illustrates well who is such a spiritual enemy not only of modern russia, he himself outlined this circle much more widely and we definitely enter there, and so the other day us congressmen jamie raskin made an extremely russophobic statement, you think that belarusian is phobic. he believes that russia must be completely destroyed, and at any cost. here is how he is called in his motives and i quote. russia

is an orthodox country professing traditional values ​​moscow is the world center of anti-feminist anti-gay anti-transgender hatred and at the same time, almost on the same days in texas, right on the street, satanists staged a ritual renunciation of baptism. an inverted cross and then crossed feathers were painted on the forehead of those who came, hymns to satan. well , it is quite obvious that the congressmen are raskin. this action does not cause rejection. and here comes the question. so what is this global battle for, which, if we split it up, it looks like armenia azerbaijan is in crisis for ukraine there young. uh, serbia and other other issues, but globally. here's what that confrontation looks like. here you are, as for yourself, and here you need to understand that the collective west, but first of all, the anglo-sections want to maintain global dominance. for what is not fighting for the preservation of the ability to control the world to share, what to confront them in such a case in the end. this

group of countries has arisen, but i will include russia china india and a number of other states. well, belarus, respectively, as an ally of russia, it is natural who want build a more harmonious system of relations between states. let's just figure it out. it understands two concepts. again, they have already been formulated. there is the concept of global dominance and the concept of a global sheet. nobody is opposed to having leaders, you know, and also the same multipolar world, but the leader sees next to him strong independent subjects capable of expressing their position, which will be influenced by stronger ones, but expressing their position of the country that offers the concept of global dominance. they see next to them only metropolitan satets and satellite status. specifically. see. it is necessary to remove the orthodox country, which interferes with gays, that is, the position. here you just took something about it. we are now saying this is one of the pillars. these are spiritual approaches, so to speak, traditional values ​​are from aspects, but this is a

much more complex system, that is, no, traditional values ​​are fighting, the right attitude towards religion is more, let's say, healthy attitude towards oneself. and this is very narrow, this is one of the aspects. this is great. it's attractive, but fighting the fair distribution of international finance the formation of new reserve currencies the correct attitude to the use of force in the world, which today has no organization. today, the united states can hold with impunity one alexandrovich there is absolutely right that we are, well, first of all , you need to understand the enemy. yes, and this track, well, you know, these are satanists, because they have a moronic holiday this halloween. they are promoting halloween. yes, this reflects what they have they have, for example, candies from the hammers more scattered. we can cling to this endlessly, and they throw in all these pseudo-value ideology, as one rightly said, to cover up their true goals. they don't have any value. they may be traditional places themselves tomorrow, but there is a struggle going on in america. tucker carlson he

smashed this raskin for these statements and there are people in america who criticize such approaches and there are quite a lot of them, but they do not become less imperialists from this. they are from this, we know sometimes carlson's tuckers. well, these are famous uh commentator who is already 80 was assassinated. he will leave such a more conservative america to work, where is the focus? yes, in my opinion, it works, yes, that means, uh, and here he declares, but the question is these people, because of this they become less american chauvinists. no, because they have a consensus on provision. as you said, global domination all over the world today they use one ideology, tomorrow they will use a different ideology, and behind this are the interests of transnational corporations. here we are somehow embarrassed by this word on the eve of the seventh of november, but we have already forgotten the word imperialism , we are dealing with global american imperialism. here, uh, and so we

're going to reformulate, then look we're going to a much higher level. well, at valdey, putin said that there is a system of driving a crenal crisis. prior to this, at the twentieth congress, seat ping said very clearly that the task of the second century is to build this socialist global new reformatted state, given the importance and role of china in the modern world. we understand that we are talking about a much larger system, at least in the asian region. well, alexander lukashenko and dugin did not accidentally talk about a just state, then we get the anglo-saxon world and some form of a new just state. in this case, how it goes, for example, like ours. uh, this process of building the entire belarusian people's assembly is being invested as a factor with uh, a fair state. that's how you are, is it? see here in this global confrontation. i am i can say, this is unequivocal, that the world order that has existed until recently is unconditional. now we see its decoration , it is actually based on the unfair

domination of one actual country or there are transnational corporations that run this country, but in fact it remains. so they imposed their development path on the rest of the world is another matter. now we are talking about the fact that there should be a lot of polarities, it is necessary to take into account the various interests that exist in the world. and this world must more fair to be arranged. and this is the message of justice. i think it is key, it is key for our history, if we are talking about the belarusian people for the slavic peoples. yes, in principle, for any normal people in the world who do not want degeneration. unfortunately, the fact remains that it prevails back in the west to this day. these are the diggenerative values ​​that lead to the degeneration of this western society. maybe something will change. maybe it is so, but in fact this is the message he present and underpinning these western values. if we are talking specifically yelling, i, uh, repeated it repeatedly. now i can say that virtually all of them, if we look at belarus, this is the last one. on a state in europe that

pursues its sovereign policy to defend its right to decide for ourselves. how can we live on this earth? with whom to be in alliance? how to develop and the fact that we will have the entire belarusian people's assembly formed. yes, it means that the law is being discussed now - this is a very important element the preservation of justice in our society from a fulcrum that allows us to withstand this stormy geopolitical storm that is happening now, because the supreme people's council is the highest representative body that will unite both representatives of the judicial legislative executive and civil society. yes , that means all these 1200 delegates. they will represent in fact the weight of the means of our society. and these are the functional decisions that are laid down in the all-belarusian people's assembly. he emphasized once again that it is very important elements, modern e functioning of our belarusian state. preservation of our state for the people. this slogan. we have been for a long time and this is not just a slogan. it is implemented after

the fact, yes, of course, some people do not like some things, it is impossible for everyone to be satisfied, but what we have today. well, most of the people. i am sure, especially after the twentieth year, i realized what we have, what we can lose and understand how it should be preserved, and just the same, that's all the belarusian the popular assembly is an important element of this preservation of justice. there are two aspects here. this is, on the one hand. subjectivity, justice, since everyone perceives it in their own way, for this it is precisely the mechanisms that are formed, yes, the mechanisms that allow us to bring to a common denominator. that's the problem in the world, the weird ones want justice, and there are no mechanisms to ensure justice , so one country interprets, that is, interests. one country interprets justice. we need new mechanisms international, which will ensure a fair distribution of resources of financial flows, and so on and so forth. many do not understand , they think justice is some kind of spiritual concept. eh, spirits have no morals. this is security, many do not understand this, they must

understand that if today there is an imbalance in society, here is one group, but it is called uh, let's say rudely, we use this word exploiting another group, sooner or later it happens. uh, socio-political breakdown, and the co-system is destroyed, but everyone is in the same boat and the boat is sinking, therefore, when lukashenka is worried that prices have gone up too sharply out of touch with reality. you see, a lot of people think. oh, he ran into a business, there is no question that he is worried about this business, too, because today you will destroy the consumer with these goals. tomorrow you consumers are not here. this is a completely different revolution. this is a revolution, the holy bourgeois, who were trained from the outside in social upheavals and the most dangerous revolutions in intelligence, and here this principle of justice preserves the balance there heard yes spoke all the same about the discussion of the doctrinal changes. uh, in two circles, this is a

wide and narrow one, in a wide circle, what we see now is masks being torn off. we are talking about the fact that there are no rules, everything is broken, everyone reveals some kind of secret desires, dirty deeds. yes, we revealed the cards of everyone laid out on the table. and what do we have in the narrow circle and it was very noticeable from the speeches at the volodarsky circle and in the narrow circle we have a charter, we have international law, which vladimir putin spoke about, which we are talking about we are including the conclusion that we can draw this is not a new world. we cannot create it today, because the new world. you asked the right question the core, what will be the core of this new world, and to create the core today under these conditions. it is simply unrealistic that we will not be able to carry out the titanic work that was done after the terrible conflict of the 20th century of the second world war in order to launch some new mechanisms. we must use the good that we have. right and justice i don't

i agree with you that justice is insecurity. this is an opportunity for development. we must move forward, and safety. we can each provide for ourselves in our own cocoon, we cannot provide for ourselves in one cocoon. and secondly, all international mechanisms developed after the second world war are under the control of the united states and international financial systems. ion understand these mechanisms. it is true justice to transfer the philosophical to the real search, you understand philosophy, it has and practically changes pleases, as the discussion goes law of the entire belarusian people's assembly. first of all, people, the idea is perceived almost non-existent, critical remarks are needed, this body is not needed. yes, it's easy to explain, but specific remarks are coming. uh, about that, uh, our people want uh to increase the role of work collectives. they understand the civil society of our patriotic civil society, which has been formed since the twentieth year, more widely than the authors of the law. they are behind. questions and this destroys the myth created by

enemy propaganda, and for some dictatorship that democratic processes and the discussion of the adoption of the constitution now, the discussion of the law of the ovns - it is very important and important now that the government hears the people, these are the comments that are being made. and i am sure that it will be so, which is introduced during the discussion of the law on the all-belarusian people's assembly. and we see how, during this discussion, even those comments that are made by the entire belarusian people's assembly. it gains legitimacy. the most important thing is the trust of the people. we saw this already in february 21, when it actually ended this difficult period and opened a page of gradual political transformation in belarus. but now this discussion once again emphasizes how mature our society is, it is taking steps towards the authorities and the authorities are taking steps towards the citizens. well, thank you very much for participating in this. he talks