we got there, therefore, in the process of talking to us, we still have to join one of the respected interlocutors, but we will not waste time, because there is a lot of this topic. let's go in order, and i remember from the past through the csto, which is now still in the information flow. this phrase will be set on fire along the entire perimeter of russia; here we see belarus in the twentieth year. central asia, the south caucasus, of course, all our attention. now chained to trying. while i will formulate this way to try to resolve the conflict between armenia and azerbaijan is a long history. and the price is already thousands of lives. we have seen that at the recent ldkbe summit an agreement was reached that in the near future there will be a meeting of the leaders of armenia and azerbaijan, mediated by the president of the russian federation, this meeting took place in sochi on monday. there, and vladimir putin announced the following peace treaty between yerevan and baku yet. but there are prerequisites that indicate

that the path to a settlement between baku and yerevan found. here is vadim in your opinion. here it all looks like aside close to reconciliation. but how stable is it? and in this case, what are the factors that stabilize and de- stavilize what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan well, if we talk about armenia and azerbaijan, then we understand that as a result of the fact that russia has significantly concentrated its efforts today. on an official military operation, her position in the csto. they became less strong. this is an objective fact less strong turkey has strengthened its influence in the region is significant. on all issues of the middle east, turkey has slightly different views on the issues of the north caucasus. moreover , we see that this meeting took place. that the parties have almost come to some kind of compromise solution, but you need to understand

what is the most important nuance. eh, what will ours be for? how do we say push? uh, opponents, after all, what’s the nude, but you have to understand the fundamental problem, where the problem comes from, uh, because a dkb was formed after the collapse of the union and the countries came e in qualifying about dkb with different after all hmm problems with different views on development on the one hand. we had a common market. general defense policy. it fled us from the other side, each other country looked at a different development option. what do you think, looking at how pashinyan and aliyev behave even at this meeting in sochi, and hmm , the parties are determined to resolve this conflict after all at the negotiating table, or each of them holds some cards under sleep , relatively speaking, yes. in order to be at the right time the moment they play it is profitable to slip you understand one thing. you know, there is a nuance, it's still such

that you have broken up the union, but uh, the union has broken up, but the parties are all parties of the csto. they came. uh, russia, unfortunately, has not managed to become, in absolute terms , a centripetal force, uniting the csto in many ways in many respects its role. there, defining and decisive. this is the strongest state, the csto state, for example, yes, it is still specific today. let's remember the meeting of the president with the general secret of only abb, stanislav zayets, where, of course, topic, azerbaijan's armenia was central please end the war clearly. what ended up decided on the sides that they need the latter is the norm of the classic. uh, of course, it was russia who turned to russia. russia landed hundreds of people there, remember how russian border guards flew planes, as putin said, it is located on all sections of the border from turkey to iran there and between armenia and azerbaijan and so on. well, what else do you need? e, let them work in this direction. it was not

in vain that i said that there is a certain game going on. i understand, what game. why was the european union dragged in there, why is the osce being dragged there? well, why? well, it’s understandable, why would they do anything there, if there is already, uh, a mediator and another csto there, as if there is nothing else to do. and why is the west so full of intermediaries, do they really need to close this project called anti-russia, or are there any other goals in this regard? the west is not only now, uh, trying. here, learning to participate in this regulation and what we see today is a continuation of these programs, who were, uh, previously announced, but, as of today, we are paying closer attention to their initiatives, because we are asking a quite logical question. what did they come with?

do they really want to resolve this conflict in order or do they have some kind of additional, but additional motivation. eh, and unfortunately we have a negative answer to this question, because we see more of an additional hidden motivation. and as for the anti-e of the russian project, who want to shut it down? yes, they talk about it a lot, but i do not agree with you, in particular, that russia has weakened its position without russia , and the situation in the region would not have been resolved. that's what we are talking about weakening, what criteria we are guided by. this is a very, very difficult question. but will it be possible to close it, and if at all such plans for an anti-russian project? i think that for sure they are in theory, but their implementation in practice at any stage, especially today, it is very, very

difficult if you are getting stronger in the region, the player is the most powerful economy and military grouping, turkey is natural. you are getting weaker, but i say again, we do not mean that russia's role is decisive in the settlement of this conflict, it remains, and most importantly, it is a peacekeeping force in this region, for which it can be able to try on these e, the republic is the russian federation we pay tribute to russia but here, unfortunately. there is a fact that today certain positions of russia and forces are diverted. this is a fact and we will be thrown under the window. means, appropriate how do you say the nuances in order to foment this conflict, naturally, we must allow torture - and they will not be peacekeepers. they will stir up this conflict by talking about this premise, when viewed from a historical point of view, again this traditional policy. when they aspire to the west, these are the possible peace treaties, agreements that are unprofitable for them in every possible way to prevent their conclusions and kindle them. this is, uh, a wave of conflicts along the perimeter of the russian federation from

my point of view. it's quite obvious for this and it is necessary to draw the european union and others there, which means european structures that will never work to pay off this body of the azerbaijani conflict, because it is a priori beneficial to them, unlike the russian federation , and from my point of view, the russian federation has once again demonstrated its strong position the talks in sochi have yielded certain results, and i think that neither the people of azerbaijan nor the people of armenia are interested. in the continuation of this conflict. it is necessary to look for a normal peaceful way of regulation. just let's take a look, well, firstly, i wanted to indicate to the audience that a hygen has joined us. here is one franchise. we are just a mediator now we are talking to the strange west that we are now trying to impose and i quote my friendship, a specific example, the previous one on october 6 in prague at the summit of eu leaders agreed on deployment, but they agreed on the deployment of an observation mission in armenia. one of the authors of this project, macron, and a week later, he openly stated that the azerbaijanis had initiated the karabakh war and allegedly. in this to him

russia helped to weaken armenia, so they have a very clear position on what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan, said that it is just as clear, because, therefore , the macron’s statement to this was clearly about armenian . uh, judgments and experts. why was it needed? well, some people think that historical france supports armenia. i think it's not about the historical ones. eh moments. it 's uh, here are the experts. they said an attempt, on the one hand, to salt russia, he is a macron in the same the statement very sharply appreciated the negative, as he said, the role of the russian federation, therefore , regulation, as well. on the other hand, the macron is frantically trying to take the place of the main european politician. here he climbs into various situations. this is not only karabakh. here, there is, like he has statements to the balkans and his position on ukraine, he is trying to become such a locomotive as the main european politician. this is his priority task. we e it is quite, apparently, when the question arises. are

countries like france capable of guaranteeing peace. here you need to look at what president alexander lukashenko said, indeed in the post-soviet space there is only one scheme for resolving any conflicts of disputes and discussions when the two sides agree. even despite stereotypes of prejudice. some of them exist. all of them are members of the commonwealth of independent states, at least and only the russian federation has the strength, tools, knowledge and, most importantly, the interest to ensure a world of security there. because security in the south caucasus is in central asia this is the security of the national security of the russian federation for france and the united states, these territories. they are manipulative, they use them as a struggle for their influence in the world. here is the difference. and by the way, for some positions, despite the fact that they are competitors, but in this part, russian

interests even intersect with turkish ones. look, in response to macron’s remark, lead immediately stated that baku’s reaction was extremely sharp in general, and he said that france crossed out the whole story relations with azerbaijan as you can see, i think that here we are talking about to a greater extent. he was an emotional utterance and head of state. this includes the practice of a crisis situation. so it does not seem that, unlike the macron, aliyev will very quickly give up his words. naturally, the problem lies in the fact that there is no word for a solution, we can make an arbitrarily statement, but there is no simple solution today, but the question of the peace treaty, and which has been sounding like the last one for weeks and months. uh, he impossible in fact, therefore, they remain in the bottom line. only uh, loud statements. eh, there is. uh, the desire to find some kind of consensus to come to

some point, stabilizing and the belarusian position. it is precisely this that is not a peace treaty that must be signed. this is not possible today, but the fact is that the parties move to some kind of consensus, so that they, e, stabilize their interests. yes , we see the external position on september 18, when pelosi came to a. and she, firstly, she came to yerevan on the wave of the fact that a number of politicians in armenia made a statement that they couldn’t cope with the csto, that this was not a shooting pistol. and so, having arrived there, uh, brings what we are here to say in the us will support democracy in armenia in difficult times. we stand next to armenia when there is a struggle between democracy and autocracy armenia is the place where we can clearly see these contradictions, in general, when the americans say this, it sounds like a threat, because we are all in the world. we are used to the fact that if someone from washington or london shouts that we are going to defend democracy, expect a war in this region , the armenians understand this, because if the armenians are not

ready to resolve this conflict peacefully, then not the csto. neither russia nor belarus will be able to influence the fact that there is finally about the cst in yerevan. i remember when, uh, there were still here, when yerevan was preparing there, the eurasian economic union and then they said that here is the cst. doesn't protect us as it should. well, you know what's extremely uh such a masculine conversation that was out on friday on these dkb themselves. what did he say guys let's. this is how the position of russia and belarus differs from the position. we are not the west. that's such a fra. how did you drink? yes, we are ready to defend the president clearly said that you crawl there at all, well, in a little different words. but although he used to clobber us around the perimeter, that you are pretending to be something there. you know each other lived in the same country sit down and talk. yes, there are difficulties. what are you doing climbing these mountains savages don't even walk. what are you playing. why are you

playing this? what are you, what does the subshin want to hide behind the csto and blame it on the dcs? for what for the fact that from the eighteenth year he brought his country to a military defeat, because the situation is not that the dkb is not defended as it should be, but the situation is in the state of the armenian armed forces. and who led to this situation? a and. eh, there are many examples. uh, it means to indicate some were how they used the s300 complexes and many other things that were there during this war and the subsequent president opened up about this and said the second moment i and armenia pashinyan declare. well , azerbaijan is not a member of the dcb. so why are you behaving like that, but azerbaijan on february 22, in my opinion, well, exactly on february 22 signed with russia that the declaration was actually de facto, defining the status of azerbaijan as a union state, and the president said the same situation with us, listen, yes, the armenians are our allies . we wish you well. we wish the territorial integrity of

sovereignty, armenia so that you finally resolve your problems, but also azerbaijan state close to us. so we will fight with him for what, but here is our peacekeeping task. why is alexander lukashenko called the main peacemaker? she post in the soviet space to achieve peace. and now, when such honest unpleasant words and unpleasant speaks, but these honest words are heard. this is a much more serious step towards peace. than some stupid macron declarations, or these hollow statements not bad squared sun. indeed, who, as the president said in this, and then we will definitely continue, please, in the end, the republic of belarus and i'm like the president. the decisions of azerbaijan, armenia and russia will reach a unanimous opinion, i will support this unanimous opinion without looking. excuse me if, maybe

i don't see it that way many miles from this theater of operations. but this is my impression of what is developing there on these borders. i already said so in comradely language, what are you guys fighting for ? why are you fighting in these mountains, 2,000 km high, killed three hundred people three hundred people died, where people do not live, where even these goats do not walk. what are you fighting, sit down, you both of you and agree. and let russia sanctify this treaty. well, you do not want any understand. here the game of this game cannot be, because the question of war and peace is being decided by the collective west. first of all, the anglo-saxons possess filigree art. divide and rule. listen. that's what i started with. and from one point of view

, our space was formed on the principles that unite us, but there were a lot of contradictions. first, there was a union state. soviet union borders were not normally established, you understand, between all the practical republics of central asia there are questions on establishing borders. and the caucasus armenia azerbaijan we are familiar with some american presidents who are bitter, which we need to admit first of all. uh, the aggravation of the situation along the entire perimeter of the russian federation along the entire perimeter. and today there is such a threat, and today they will use everything to set fire to several hot spots along the perimeter of the russian federation, the task is to stretch the forces of russia and destabilize the internal political situation in the country and as soon as they destabilize the situation in russia, uh, all the cis countries will fall. and the most important thing. i want to say this because it's important. it concerns us. what worries me most

now, i want to say in response to, let's say, hotheads, and now on russian television. i was invited to have channels where the topic is discussed, should belarus take direct part in a military special military operation, that is, send a contingent there, that is, they are already discussing it. this listen there are three categories of people who can advocate for it . the first is people, and the sucking has become mentally retarded, but we don’t touch them at all with a fool there’s nothing to talk about, the second is smart people, educated our people are patriots, but they are a little fanatic - they have such fanaticism fanaticism, it always interferes to think, you understand, that is, they are ready to throw everything into the furnace of war. war is not only strength and firepower. this is, first of all, the ability to think, the ability to think, and the economy, and the third is agents of influence, agents of deep implementations that undermine the situation in russia from within i want to make an ak again. for russia, first of

all, the main interest of these 208,000 m² is to preserve the zones of political economic stability. this is the most important thing and the first step towards the collapse of russia is that it will be very difficult for the government to make armed conflicts all night long to ensure stability on the perimeter. after all, more than once they talked about tajikistan, kyrgyzstan, except for armenia, azerbaijan, and pay attention to the moment. he was, of course, ironic when the president asked stanislav’s question did you sit too long in moscow and then he indicated that, in fact, 3 years is not enough for the secretary general of the state clinical hospital and now we understand why because in each of these areas there is a very serious situation in order to delve into it and specifically deal with it effectively the question needs time and complexity, among other things. quite right. here's another front. let's discuss it. look, as soon as we see calls in the west to go save democracy. here they are waking up. well cells like

whatever. they can be called here fedin declared the creation of an anti-war committee under the wing of khodorkovsky , for example, in russia it is not an absolutely new idea, but nevertheless, it is now being raised again now these anti-war committees of khodorkovsky freedom forums in russia kasparov and ours or already wrong, says our fugitives there it is most likely pro-polish. there, about the western tikhonovskoye with their offices before this guido venezuela, this front, yes, or the front line. here is vyacheslavchaya, what must be borne in mind here. that's what game is here it is conducted so that we also do not oversleep it, but absolutely. clear. what a game, when there are conflicts on the outer perimeter, there should be involved forces about the west yes , focused on supporting these western forces that are located inside the country. and this is a very dangerous thing. here is the fifth sixth column, some say, and their existence must be borne in mind that such things will happen as long as this tough confrontation between the west and the east is going on. yes, therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to them, but on the other hand, it is necessary to open and

well, what does it lead to that they hide behind these beautiful words, and there is democracy in the world and so on, but what is peace and democracy today - this is something when they give obama a prize for the war in iraq , that means the nobel prize for the world is a peacemaker yes, who completely ruined the country , destroyed it up into chaos, uh, and still they ca n’t figure it out there. these are the double standards. it is necessary to clearly and clearly show our society so that people can see what is behind these beautiful words, but this is information stuffing in order to to remind myself or really. here 's something to look forward to from these guys. uh something you can know what it is. what do you want to understand? this is such an attempt to create some kind of quasi-pseudo -legitimate government in exile, so that when the mess begins, it would be possible to give legitimacy to an external invasion, you know, such an organization was, a jamborina was called a jamburi. this is how the americans specifically created the cia when

it was the cold war. yes, the unification of uh, anti-soviet groups of rebel nicaragu angola, there uh latin america that is the same, they are trying. that's how the methods that were in the cold war are the methods that are now being created from pro-western ones. e politicians. yes, yes, our influence groups, because why are we going to hide that we don’t have the people of the russian federation left, there are no people left who are guided by, well, in russia, the same khodorkovsky, the same kasparov, yes, such people are in the minority, but do not exist, they become radicalized, they become embittered. and, of course, they will try the americans to stake on this , uh, to create centers of such influence abroad. i think these are just the first steps, and the next moment for these people, of course, is an attempt to remind ourselves, we see, what a fight is going on. here, between our fugitives in the camp, they were hardly stuffed there in august in this one bag, uh, an office,

tikhanovskaya, right? you know, here they have an office, probably they closed the door, and they still pushed the lettuce in there with their feet, he resisted the door, they locked it , put this bald dryer. so guard there with shooting. by the way, that's interesting. i recently heard this extremist here. he learned the belarusian language from him, did not know it, but he speaks belarusian with a polish accent. here walking it turned out there. yes, lieutenant colonel, he says, yushman, polish words slip constantly. this is how they were born. that's what they are some belarusian politicians. with them, this polish accent will always strike exactly the same way as these feigins and kasparov khodorkovskys, no matter how they they said what they think about the future of the russian people is their main topic, how to divide russia how to make russia weaken in the future and people see it, that is, people see our people. here we are talking, what is it now, when we meet in the republic. hey, when are we going to explain? they see that evil comes from these people. so they declared peace

and began to form military formations on the history of ukraine under their own type of command, then their command is not recognized. that is, they cannot reconcile with each other, the same khodorkovsky all the rest. well, who will trust them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? and read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to determine the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find parts to place a bet, what kind of money to pump there? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist groups cannot be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also using them for our russian related work. how much more we disagreed, i saw more subtle settings in dc, it seems to me, but the anti-russian rhetoric. it developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the leadership of the russian

federation, in particular, vladimir putin, and the waves that accompanied it in parallel were waves against russians in general and today . this is the narrow line against the government. e leadership of russia, it has already exhausted itself and needs look for new mechanisms of information work with the population. after all, even in our neighboring countries they said a long time ago that the russians should make a revolution at home, not sit here with us, but make a revolution at home and involve russians in this topic. e creations here are such already quite well-a-clearly delineated structures. it just indicates that the information that needs to be conveyed at this stage should be voiced by the russians, that is, the code that they should send should be the russian code . western, because the western no longer work absolutely agree with vadim of france than in not paying attention to it. you can't, because

it's not clear. at what stage it can go into another phase, it is impossible to feel it. uh, western diplomats have come to our kurapaty. yes, it didn’t become like yes, when we say partridges, i would generally suggest that this word be abandoned. this word was coined in winter. here, the tract where the mass grave is, you understand, and we continue this myth created there in the late eighties and poznyak did it on purpose, but don't care. he wanted those people who were shot and the nef would not give a damn. e. they constantly exaggerate these figures and why the kurapaty emphasize this word, because they strive. here, turn this into part of your biography, part of your political history for them, kurapaty, like the chernobyl way, this is not a memory of those who were shot and this is not a memory of the disaster at a nuclear power plant, this is a memory for the birth of the combat memory of their political youth, which could lead them to and then , what

we repeat this word all the time. we're working pouring water on their mill. no, no partridges. this invented name is excellent. i am very glad that you made this remark absolutely, and it is all the more complemented by absurdity and indignation on our part. that's why western diplomats came to this tract, i became oppositionists, in which western diplomats used to go there, the question arises. here we are constantly talking about what is going on, if this hybrid war is not open, it is knitted to us by the west and western diplomats come to this tract why at this time in order to send us some maj? some, you might think, why, at the same moment, when, for example, in italy, the fascist march is taking place, mussolini is remembered, no one comes to the italian embassy and talks about the trail and victims that reach for the name of mussolini. here's how to relate to the fact that western diplomats and ours may have some kind of

tolerance of incomprehensible humanity, when we look at it this way, well, with an understanding of this or how they look at the holy fools. that is why we allow us to be dealt with like this when they try to demonstrate something to our population and us on our territory or send some kind of message here, the message that they lay in these visits and so on. places like this. this is again pedaling the fact that the soviet union is negative, this is a totalitarian society, because it absolutely does not correspond from a scientific point of view absolutely. uh, so these things they play on this political situation, which is unfolding in the world, it is necessary to open this underwater one. they did not come there for people who died in a minute, but to make politics on the spot, once again show their accents. here the west says that the ussr soviet society is bad. why are you focusing on him , focusing on us. look how good we are, how we keep your memory of this tragedy. although they wanted to spit, as it was already told here. the first thing to do is to ignore them, they don't exist. there we are

inflating this topic, some handful of some came diplomats. they go everywhere, that they walk through the forest, they all went to the forest, and you and i are creating an informational occasion. who knows about this in belarus , today we are discussing the pot on national television. it means that they come down like a monument to the victory, and it gets to its knees, like merkel thumped on her knees in buchenwald, let us thump on her knees, for every folded belarusian child. they are reached through the forests. there is logic here, on the one hand, that it is not necessary to attach such importance to this, on the other hand, this representatives of official representatives of foreign states, and they declare the position of their states on our territory. we can't help but react to what civil society is reacting to. look, you see, not the state, until i saw it, maybe if i had missed the statement there mida yes, it probably will be. uh, let 's hope as well, but civil society reacts. after all, those who came there to protest against this parish. these are not just journalists, they are the leader

of public opinion. and our patriots are our people they demand from these diplomats to stop such walking, that is, the people themselves demand. because if this goes unpunished, they will perceive it as a challenge to our national identity, our national memory, so of course we cannot allow this. but what else pleases me is this reaction of diplomats. this is the reaction of some neighboring states. and such a hysterical response to our historical policy with you. here are examples that the belarusian state. i assure you. here, i look, even i don’t want the younger generation to overestimate the tree, there’s no knocking here. yes, but it is bearing fruit that we are changing the school course in history, that we taught chickens from the history of belarusian statehood. we have upgraded and are still looking. how is the teaching of social science block universities. yes, uh, a year of historical memory, what we are doing to memorialize ours is that we are

dealing with negative moments and collaborators and the army of the region and everything that was here. it just causes terrible rejection, because we beat. eh, that's the worst. here in this is the rat, uh, rat essence of this pseudo-nationalism, implicated in some kind of pro-polish intentions. we are hitting such people there, we are destroying the basis of the ideology that lay, er, in the attempted coup d'état of the twentieth year. and naturally. we will we will speak the truth and stalinist repressions. we will speak the truth, but those who create these myths will not need the truth. ah, there are any pseudo-kurapatahs for us, that is, for us any sacrifices that were made, we mourn for them, moreover, the state recognized that the victims were innocent, but the state did it, and people are trying to pervert this memory, using their political interests, only with the truth to be careful, in the nineties they

forced us to tell the truth, and in our country every chekist was a criminal, you know or not, but many let's say the police showed some wild documents. ah, we continue our program, move on in more detail, let's talk about poland, which has already become such a permanent threat. and it no longer hides. e, secretary of state of the light of security of belarus on volfovich in an interview with osb belarus today said so, the political course. warsaw clearly indicates preparations for war. well, i would like to pay attention to the curious material that was published by the belgian portal modern diplomacy of modern diplomacy and we read in their plans about polish politicians quite specific quotes the right-wing justice party's plan to revive the republic of poland within the boundaries of historical lands. it seems that operations on the territory of the former ussr took shape long before the russian war, writes this portal, the authors of this article

believe that in the event of the seizure of territory. warsaw will try to hold a referendum to become part of poland at the request of the polish authorities. by that time, the vsu will already be broken, i pay attention to writing about it. belgian edition, and how realistic is the scenario olga i would pay attention first of all to the fact that this is more the opinion of polyakov and not the portal. just reprinted this article. yes, yes, that's it, uh, it's just a scenario of which there is one and scenarios for the development of the situation, of which there are many today, perhaps it see realism. i think two tracks should be watched here. these are the possibilities of the political track and the military track, if we are talking about the military track for poland in particular, then that’s all, and what, uh, spoke about, uh, the secretary of state, uh, belorussia volfovich and the security council and the numbers that were translated. they are completely in line with the situation.

this is true, but you need to see what is on the other side, but on the other side. after all , more, being a member of nato and, by her own assertion, an exemplary member of nato that's why. in any case, she will coordinate all her actions with her allies for her. this is extremely important, and this is a military track, as far as the political poland is a member of the european union and the legitimacy of its actions, obtaining some kind of permits is also extremely important for poland. but the position of poland is tough, uncompromising and unequivocal. it is very difficult to perceive in the european union, and for the colonization of poland, which warns a separate european politicians, it is. and that's what i printed. uh, belgian portal. we can consider, of course, from the point of view that this is how it could be in the direction of poland. well, maybe this is a warning for europe , uh, what plans are hatched by individual countries of this

moment. you understand, in order to talk about the fact that the mass of these complex factors, today it greatly hinders the speed of movement of a person for a second. i would like to point out what point, yes, we can talk about reality. realistically, well, look, in fact, poland has already taken a step towards creating another commonwealth. they also received special rights for their citizens on the territory of ukraine, which is like not a recreation, which means that this polish commonwealth had this first step, they already perceive it so polish in fact. yes , at first, as they created in 1569. they were focused on this by the polish elites to impose this colonization on these lands, which became part of the commonwealth and further systematically. methodically, from century to century, these things have been implemented and now on a new round in the twentieth year. they declared openly, that they need the same all of belarus , not only on the western eastern crosses. yes , they claim their own, but for our entire territory, and in ukraine they have an opportunity. they have already won themselves special rights and can enter into state

bodies. and this is good ground for , as they say, to come out of the shadows at the right time and make these lands part of the polish state . colleagues in the first place, what is happening, all this has long been described. predicted and it was all planned. listen to the country motivate them to take certain actions. think about the country suffered huge losses in the great patriotic war. for them, it was world war ii. they had a historical memory, but it was necessary to formulate such concepts in society that would allow them to perceive militarization normally. the second is to form an image of the enemy. to set up on the one hand against the russian federation, on the other hand, it is like occupiers, on the other hand, against germany, reparations to germany for this, the americans very competently threw the idea of ​​​​greater poland from the sea and they exploited this idea and are still exploiting it in order to motivate poland to this aggressive militaristic position.

it was not just that the ideal infrastructure for the transfer of troops was built there. it was not just that money was pumped in there, and today poland no longer understands one thing, that i will arrange these plans for greater poland. they are a tool and the first striking force that they want to send the old world does not want to fight. here, poland. this is the next force behind ukraine, which will fight near the baltic states. not enough resources. you've been there, they create conditions for the placement of ebosnat on their territory. and here is poland from the point of view of the population of the depths of the territory of readiness for some kind of concept to carry out military operations. she 's practically today. well, and an independent international subject, which can wage war without the participation of nato. if you look at the troops that are concentrating in poland and the technical support of these troops, then poland today can independently conduct regional conflicts, an operation, poland with my points of view. again, this is a vivid example of this divide, rule, anglo- saxon policy, which is carried out because

the united states of great britain is not interested. everything in the strong european union, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the eternal enemy for the west - this means russia, those who are in alliance with it, and poland is just the perfect tool that allows you to keep both one and the other in good shape. yes, and under the threat of some of these actions, they really will not, but the fact it remains a fact that poland is the conductor of this anglo-saxon policy on the territory of europe along the continental, they still came to the importance of the polish politicians themselves and did not belittle their subjectivity. and we see that eastern european politicians, whether orban or, means, the poles of independence, no matter what they stake on, they carry out their policy. quite independently, and, of course, the americans did not throw in the idea of ​​greater poland; they permanently exploited it. well, let's say it straight out regardless. this was before the us became great power. this idea is present in the polish establishment permanently and moreover, and no one formulates it like greater poland, it has

the name of the fourth speech of the commonwealth, it all revolves around it. this plan is from my point of view. he is not realistic. uh, why do we need to think of something for the poles what they want to do, perhaps he is somewhere there in some kind, so i don’t know the polish closets, there is the general staff or some kind of party headquarters. they are open about what they want to do. that is, they have a plan if you have plan mister fix fix, he says there is a plan, they have a plan, the fourth speech, sleep was voiced long ago by the kaczynski brothers, when and uh, the other was to live, that is, the creation of poland as uh, equal to uh, germany and france of european power for this here we think the americans are using poles a. warsaw think that i do not use the poles and these americans. yes, they use it to their advantage, that is, more should become equal of berlin and paris. the next moment is the creation of a chain of states dependent on poland from the baltic to black sea. and they take the caucasus there, for example, georgia, too, for this they do not need to

include territory. why don't i believe that they can hold such a referendum, it's the belgians. and by the way, speaking westerners do not fully understand our mentality. they now think russia held a referendum and poland will. well, in donetsk, who was in the donbass understands that there most of the people sympathize with russia, there are those who don’t support it, but a significant part sympathizes with what do you think in lviv, so here are the residents they will go and vote for poland. and even if they hold this referendum, the poles are a terrible dream for them to include in their state, there are 10 million, there are already several million ukrainians living with them, there are still 10 million refugees. millions of ukrainians, they directly declare. this will be the bongarization of poland , they are afraid of this. but the creation of a network of protectorates all these dependent puppet states. these are their goals, what vyacheslav viktorovich spoke about. this is an agreement. it's actually a protectorate agreement not much time remains, but we involuntarily come to this topic. and

the theme of global confrontation. here's a recent one. uh, valdai, vladimir putin said that we have come not to a systemic crisis, but to a doctrinal one . what does it mean, in principle, if we say in general terms that we all already understood that the system of international relations has broken down, but in order to build a new kind of world order is needed for everyone to answer the main question. under what conditions will we build it? well, this is, if the stepfather is a common word, yes, but krenality is also about values ​​and about meaning. in this case, it illustrates well who is such a spiritual enemy, not only modern russia, he himself outlined this circle much more widely we go there. that we are entering and so the other day, us congressman jamie raschen made an extremely russophobic statement, you think that he believes that he believes that russia should be completely destroyed, and at any cost. and this is how he calls his motives and i quote russia, an orthodox country professing traditional values, moscow the world center of anti-feminist anti-gay anti-

transgender hatred and at the same time practically on the same days in texas right on the street , satanists staged a ritual renunciation of baptism. an inverted cross was drawn on the forehead of the one who came, and then baptized peregyn to satan. well, it is quite obvious that the congressmen are spreading this action does not cause rejection. here comes the question. so what is this global battle for, which, if we split it up, it looks like armenia azerbaijan is in crisis ukraine is not enough there serbia and other other issues, but globally, this is what this confrontation looks like. here you are for yourself and here. here you need to understand that e is a collective west, but first of all, the anglo-saxons want to maintain global dominance. why not fight to maintain the ability to control the world to divide and rule. in this case, at the end, a group of countries arises, but i will include russia, china, india, and a number of other states. well, belarus, respectively, as

an ally of russia is natural, who want to build a more harmonious system of relations states, including just figure it out. this is understandable. they have already been formulated. there is the concept of global dominance and the concept of a global sheet. nobody is opposed to having leaders , you know, and also the same multipolar world, but the leader sees next to him strong independent subjects capable of expressing their position, which will be influenced by stronger ones, but expressing their position of the country that offers the concept of global dominance. they see next to them only the satellites of the metropolis and satel here see specifically. it is necessary to remove the orthodox country, which prevents gays from maintaining order. that is, look, here you just took something about what. we are now saying this is one of the pillars. these are spiritual approaches, so to speak, traditional values, this is one of the aspects. but this is a much more complex system. that is, traditional values ​​are fighting, the right attitude towards religion is more

, let's say, healthy attitude towards oneself. and this is very narrow. this is one of the aspects. this is great. it attracts, but still struggles, in general equitable distribution of international finance formation of new reserve currencies correct attitude to the use of force in the world, which today has no organization. today, the united states can go unpunished alexandrovich, it is absolutely right that we, well, first of all, the enemy must be understood. yes , and this track, well, you know, these are these satanists, because they have a moronic holiday this halloween . they are promoting halloween on halloween, yes, this reflects what they have, for example, candy was scattered from the hammers. can to cling to it endlessly. and they throw in all these pseudo-value ideology, as vadim rightly said, to cover up their real goals. today they have the same values. they may be traditional places themselves tomorrow, but the same tucker carlson is fighting there in america. he smashed this raskin for these statements and there are people in america who criticize such approaches and there

are quite a lot of them, but this does not make them less imperialists . they are from this, we know sometimes so iro carlson well, these are famous e commentator who is already 80 was assassinated. he will leave such a more conservative america to work, where is the focus? yes, in my opinion, it works, yes, that means, uh, and so he declares, but the question is these people, they become less american chauvinists from this. no, because they have a consensus on provision. as you said by this global dominance all over the world today they use one ideology, tomorrow they will use another. and behind this are the interests of transnational corporations. here we are from we are somehow ashamed of this word on the eve of november 7, but we have already forgotten the word imperialism, we are dealing with global american imperialism. that's good. i'll reformulate then look, let's go to a much higher level. well, on the wald,

putin said that there is, which means that there are systemic doctrinal crises. prior to that, at the twentieth congress, the eaten pin said very clearly that the task of the second century is to build this socialist global new reformatted state, given the importance and role of china in the modern world. we understand that we are talking about a much larger system, at least in the asian region. well, it was not by chance that alexander lukashenko and the dugins spoke about a just state. then we get the anglo-saxon world and some form of a new just state. in this case, how it goes, for example, like ours. uh, this is the process of building the entire belarusian people's assembly. i'm invested as a factor with uh, a fair state. that's how you do it? see here in this global confrontation. i am i can say unequivocally that certainly the world order that existed until recently. now we see its decoration, it is actually based on the unfair domination of one actual country, or there are transnational corporations that

control this country, but in fact it remains. so they imposed their development path on the rest of the world is another matter. now we are talking about the fact that there should be a lot of polarities, it is necessary to take into account the various interests that exist in the world. and this world must more fair to be arranged. and this is the message of justice. i think it is key, it is key for our history, if we are talking about the belarusian people for the slavic peoples. yes, in principle, for any normal people in the world who do not want degeneration. unfortunately, the fact remains that it prevails in the west to this day. these are the digger irrational values ​​that lead to the degeneration of this western society. something will change maybe it is so, but in fact it is this message, it is present and lies the foundation of these western values. if we are talking specifically about belarus, i, i have repeatedly repeated now, i can say that, in fact, if we look at belarus, this is the last sovereign state in europe that pursues its sovereign policy to defend its right to decide for ourselves. how can we live on this earth, with whom to be

in alliance, how to develop and the fact that we will have the entire belarusian people's assembly . yes, it means that now there is a discussion of the law. this is a very important element. preservation of justice in our society is a fulcrum that allows us to withstand this stormy geopolitical storm that is happening now, because the supreme people's council is a higher representative body that will unite both representatives of the judicial legislative executive and civil society. yes , that means all these 1200 delegates. they will represent the actual weight of the means of our society. and these are the functional decisions that are laid down in the russian national assembly ; i emphasize once again that it is a very important element in in the modern functioning of our belarusian state, the preservation of our state for the people has been our slogan for a long time. and this is not just a slogan. it is actually implemented. yes, of course, some people do not like some things, it is impossible for everyone to be satisfied, but the fact that we

have today the majority of the people. i am sure, especially after the twentieth year, i realized what we have, what we can lose and understand how it should be preserved, and just the same, the entire belarusian people's assembly is an important element of this preserving justice. there are two aspects here. this is, on the one hand. subjectivity, justice, since everyone perceives it in their own way, for this it is precisely the mechanisms that are formed, yes , the mechanisms that allow us to bring to a common denominator. that's the problem in the world, countries want justice, and there are no mechanisms to ensure justice, so one country interprets, that is, interests. one side interprets justice. we need new international mechanisms that will provide fair distribution of resources, financial flows, etc. many do not understand justice as some kind of spiritual concept. uh, the spiritual has no moral, justice. this is safety. so, many people do not understand this and should understand if there is an imbalance in society today. here is one group, but

profiting. uh, let's say so rudely we use such a word exploiting another group, sooner or later happens. uh, the socio-political elephant and now the system is collapsing, but everyone is in the same boat and the boat is sinking, therefore, when lukashenka is worried that prices have gone up too sharply out of touch with reality. you see, a lot of people think. oh, he ran into a business, there is no question that he is worried about this business, too, because today you will destroy the consumer with these goals. tomorrow you consumers are not here. this is a completely different revolution. this is a revolution of well-fed, bourgeois, who were trained from the outside in intelligence. coups and revolutions are the most dangerous, and here this principle of justice preserves there to keep the balance in the country heard yes, she spoke about the discussion of doctrinal changes in two circles. it's wide and narrow. here, in a wide circle, what we are seeing now is that the masks are being torn off,

we are talking about the fact that there are no rules, everything is broken, everyone reveals some kind of secret desires , dirty deeds. yes, we revealed the cards of everyone laid out on the table. and what do we have in the narrow circle, and this was very noticeable from the speeches at the volodarsky circle. and in the narrow circle, we are tired of international law, which vladimir spoke about putin about whom we are talking, including the conclusion that we can draw. this is not a new world. we can not create it today, because you asked the correct question the core of the world, what will be the core of this new world, and create the core today under these conditions. it's just unrealistic that we ca n't. institute-tonic work that was done after the terrible conflict of the 20th century world war ii in order to launch some new mechanisms. we must use the good that we have, the right and justice, i disagree with you , injustice is insecurity. this is an opportunity for development. i we must move

forward, and safety. we can each provide for ourselves in our own cocoon, for example, for each in one cocoon. and secondly, all international mechanisms developed after the second world war are under the control of the united states and international financial systems. ion you understand these mechanisms as it is true, justice u transfer the philosophical into a real search, you understand philosophy, it has a practical dimension pleases how the discussion of the law is going on in the entire belarusian people's assembly. the first thing people perceive is almost non-existent, critical remarks are needed, this body is not needed. yes, it's easy to explain, but specific remarks are coming, but about that, uh, ours. people want the role of labor collectives to increase. they are more broadly than the authors of the law understand, civil society is our patriotic civil society, which has been formed since the twentieth year. they ask questions. and this destroys the myth created by enemy propaganda, a some kind of dictatorship, such democratic

processes and the discussion of the adoption of the constitution now, the discussion of the law of the ovns - it is very important and important now that the government hears the people, these are the comments that are being made. and i am sure that it will be so, which is introduced during the discussion of the law on the entire belarusian people's assembly. and we see how that's in the course of this discussion. yes, those comments that are made by the entire belarusian people's assembly. it gains legitimacy. the most important thing is the trust of the people. we are it we saw already in february 21, when it actually ended this difficult period and opened the page for a gradual political one. information from belarus but now this discussion once again emphasizes how mature our society is, it is taking steps towards the authorities and the authorities are taking steps towards the citizens. well, thank you very much for participating in this conversation. on the one hand, it turned out to be diverse, but on the other hand, one way or another, we moved on to the main thing - this creation, or

at least keeping it in the focus of our attention a just state providing security that will be exclusively local much global is nothing we really would like. thank you very much for today. the most pressing topics and questions how long does love actually live and why did scientists give it only 3 years, what interests people today and what do you want to bring up for discussion, psychologists came to the conclusion that we should fight with anger? no need to say hello to her inside you feel any emotion, any emotion it lasts well, if you believe following 11 seconds no. it is rather complex, it

consists of many feelings, there is gratitude for the attachment of tenderness, see the concept of neutralize on the belarus 24 tv channel in the program. probably your wife, she’s not afraid to walk around the city at night, she sleeps at night, a surge protector is a surge protector , as i always love my program something new you will endure so this is the most to show. here we show. oh, i have to go, and i can put it in, and then i won’t get it. i won't paste. no, i can't risk it. i'm the same head of work, watch good morning, belarus with svetlana borovskoy in new time on our tv channel. i

lost love, i will never forgive you for what happened, and where is vladik? i didn't want to come here ? i just have nowhere else to go. i risked everything for love, she stuck a knife in my heart and ran off to ride do you think it will help. you can pay to live as you want to live, as i decide you

don’t even care that your wife is, lover. you just like it or not? now we will live under one roof, as bequeathed, father watch the series return my love from tuesday to friday on belarus 24 tv channel.

valeria understands horses not really. and what does eugene think, in general, i answered yes, but in fact no. you wanted to deceive us elena as you answered the question, but i already doubt it. it is right to doubt. it is useful for a person with critical thinking. this is in this case, what influences the questions for schoolchildren, the answer, which

even adults will hardly give. oh, it’s not evening, it’s not evening, look at our tv channel. in what did our ancestors store real masculine products the craft of cooperage? our potato pancakes are not for nothing that we are called bulbash. myths and legends are nearby popular culture in all its glory, watch every week the project of fashion for culture on belarus 24 tv channel. everything changes very quickly time

goes by imperceptibly minutes days of the year we never have enough time to stop and think about those who are waiting for us at this moment it’s worth remembering those without whom we will be so lonely on this earth, it’s time to say you know mom, i miss or listen to dad right now is not postponing for later it is necessary to say. i'm here, i'm here appreciate the time spent with your loved ones.